Pov Graph
Pov Graph
Pov Graph
The term poverty can be considered to have a cluster of different overlapping meanings
depending on the subject area or discourse . In the Poverty and Social Exclusion (PSE) Survey
both poverty and social exclusion have been measured using a range of different definitions and
techniques so that the results can be usefully compared with other work and a better scientific
consensus developed .
ABSOLUTE POVERTY
Absolute poverty is defined as a situation were the resources of individuals or families are
inadequate to provide his basic needs of life such as food , shelter , clothing etc.
RELATIVE POVERTY
Relative poverty is defined as a position of individual household compared with the
average income in the country such as poverty line set at one half of the mean income or at the
40% of the distribution and which often varies with the level of average income .
The people / households with a high income and a high standard of living are not
poor. However, to other groups of peoples /households that are not poor can also be identified
in a cross . Sectional (one point in time) survey as on the PSE Survey.
This group is not poor and if their income remains high their standard of
living will rise – they will rise out of poverty. This group is in the opposite situation to the
previous group. This situation can arise when the income of someone which is poor suddenly
increases ( due to getting a job). However, it takes time before they are able to buy the things that
they need to increase their standard of living. Income can both rise and fall faster than standard
of living.
A cross sectional “poverty survey can provide some limited but useful
information on the dynamics of poverty since it is possible not only to identify the ‘poor’ and the
‘not poor’ but also those likely to be sinking into poverty ( that is , people/ households with a low
income but high standard of living “). Living in poverty is, by definition, an extremely
unpleasant situation so it is not surprising that people go to considerable lengths to avoid it and
try hard to escape from poverty once they have sunk into it . Therefore, a cross-sectional poverty
is larger than the group escaping from poverty.
Finally, poor people focus on assets rather than income and link their lack of
physical, human, social and environmental assets to their vulnerability and
exposure to risk.
The concept of domestic decentralisation took its shape with a view to better
administration and development prospective, and for quick rural development and corporation of
rural development and co-operation of rural people. State government does not posses adequate
wisdom of local affairs and problems. From this view democratic decentralisation can constitute
a significant contribution to the theory and practices of nation building activities in the
developing area. Panchayath are also predictable to pay an important role in planning and
implementing various development programmes.
After independence of India has continually implemented development
interventions with the objective of improving the social and economic condition of the people.
Now it is strongly felt that an effective Panchayath Raj System can bring about rapid and
integrated development through people participation. To bring about these intended goals the
Government of India has implemented many anti poverty programmes in the state, such as:
Sufficient provisins have been made for their implementation through the
panchayathi institutions. But this programmes could not bear the desired result due to
inconsistency between scheme aim, poor quality of asset creation lack of resources and
manipulation of the records.
TYPES OF POVERTY
Situational Poverty
It is generally caused by a sudden crisis or loss and is often temporary.
Events
Of causing situational poverty include environmental disasters, divorce , or severe health
problems.
Generational Poverty
Absolute Poverty
It involves the scarcity of necessities such as shelter, running water and food.
Families
Who lives in absolute poverty tend to focus on day to day survival.
Uraban poverty
Rural Poverty
It occurs in non metropolitan areas with population below 50,000. The rural
poverty rate is growing and has exceed the urban rate every year.
EFFECT OF POVERTY
Poverty involves a complex array of risk factors that adversely affect the
population in a multitude of way . The four primary risk factors affecting families
living
In poverty are :
Cognitive lags
Climatic factors
Demographic factors
Peronal causes
Economic causes
Social causes
,’
Climatic factors
Climatic conditions constitute an important causes of poverty. The hot climate reduces the
capacity of people especially the ruralises to work for which production severally suffers
frequent flood , famine
Earth quake and cyclone cause, heavy damage to agriculture.More over absence of timely
rain,affect
Agricultural production
Demographic factors
The following demographic factors accountable for poverty in rural areas.
1. Rapid growth of population
Size of family has significant being on rural poverty. The larger the size of
Family, the lower is the per capita income and the lower in the standard of living.
Personal causes
Lack of motivation
Idleness
Most of the rural people are lazy, dull and reluctant to work. Hence they rot in
poverty.
Economic causes
Low agricultural productivity
Poverty and real income are very much interrelated . Increase in real
income leads to reduction of the magnitude of poverty. So far as agricultural sector is
concerned , the farmers
Even today are following the traditional method of cultivation. Hence there is low
agricutural
Productivity resulting in rutral poverty.
Social causes
Education
Caste system
Caste system has always be responsible for rural poverty . The
subordination
Of low caste people by the high caste people by the high caste people caused the
poverty
Of the farmer. Due to rigid caste system, the low caste people could not participate in the
gameof economic progress.
The joint family system provides social security to its members. Some people
take
Advantage of it . They live upon the income of others ,they become idles. Their normal
rountine of life consists in eating, sleeping and be getting children. In this way poverty gets
aggreated through joint family system.
Social custo
Poverty Alleviation
The govt of India was taken up various measures to surmount the problem of povert.
Poverty alleviation programmes comprising of wage employment programmes, rural housing
schemes and public distribution system have been initiated from time to time . Some were
moderately successful in addressing the issue of poverty where as others suffered from major
flaws in their implementation.
MGNREGA (2000)
The main aim of this type of programmes was developed of rural areas .
This was only given to BPL families and fund was to be spending for individual
beneficiary schemes forSC,ST, and 3 % for the establishment of barriers free
infrastructure for disabled people.
0
Wage Employment programmes
Meaning
A wage is a monitory compensation ( or remuneration , personal
expenses, labour ) paid by an employer to an employee in exchange for work
done.
Payment may be calculated as a fixed amount for each task completed ( a task wage
or piece rate) or at any hourly or daily rate , or based on an easily measured quantity
of work done.
MGNREGA
Funding
Unemployment Allowance
If an applicant not provided employment with in fifteen days of receipt of his l her
application shall be entittled to a daily unemployment allowance. In the case of advance
applications , employment should be provided from the date that the employment has been
sought or within 15 days of the date of application which ever is later.
Deendayal
Upadhyaya 2015 Rural Provide
Grameen Development employment
Kaushalya through skill
training
programmes
Indira Awaas
Yojana Rural housing Provide
1985 financial
assistance to
rural poor for
constructing
their houses
The Indira Gandhi National Old Age Pension Scheme (IGNOAPS ) is a non
contributory
old age pension scheme . That covers Indians who are 60 years and above and
live below
the poverty line . The pension scheme is part of the National Social Assistance
Programme
( NSAP ) that launched by the ministry of rural developing in August 1995 . All
INGOAPS
Beneficiaries aged 60 – 79 recevies a monthly pension of Rs . 200 . Those 80
years and
above receives a monthly pension amount of Rs . 500 . Any individual year or
holder should
be eligible for old age pension ; for women , eligibility to be years or older . APL /
BPL criteria
should not be for exclusion .
History
Article 41 of the Indian constitution directs the state to
provide public assistance to its citizens in the case unempolyment , old age ,
sickness and disablement
and in other case of underserved want within the limit of its economic , capacity
and dvelopment.
1995 : The NSAP IS launched with the aim of providing social assistance
to
destitute.
2009 : The NSAP IS expanded to include the Indira Gandhi National Widow
Pension Scheme (IGNWPS) .
2012 : Monthly Pension under IGNOAPS increased from 200 to 300 age limit
changed to 40 -79 and 18 -79 years respectively .
COMPONENTS
The national assistance programme consist of five sub schemes they are :
Table no . 2 .2
Components of old age pension schemes.
Annapurna
Senior citizen 10 kg of free rice
Recent studies of NSAP Show that the social pension schemes are
performing reasonably well and levels of leakage are low and
transactable, 2014 study by the national
burequ of economic research conclude that the Indian government should
increase the
pension amount to lower the risk of poverty among the elderly and work to
expand the
inclusion of the most vulnerable group .
Pension Schemes
National Old Age Pension Scheme
Widow Pension Scheme
Pension to the physically challenged persons.
Pension to unmarried woman above 50 years
Pension to the mentally challenged persons.
Agriculture labour pension .
In the rural parts of the countries, it is seen that maximum people do not have
proper
roof over their head . They do not have suitable houses to live and to nurture their families. The
maximum percentage of rural population does not have adequate financial strength to build
houses
of their own. Moreover they also do not get the home loan facilities that most of the urban
population
enjoys, Banks are not ready to give them housing loans as they do not have strong assets or
guarantee
for loan approval . so in the case , the central and state govt take initiative for reducing these
situations.
The prime ministers flagship of rural housing scheme called Pradhan Mantri
Awaas Yojana
Gramin under the scheme financial assistance is provided for construction pucca house
to all house
Less and house holds living in dilapidated house. The cost of house shared between
centre and state.
In a recent announcement made by the cental government there is a talk of
implementation of
Awaas scheme for the rural population . This implementation of housing developments
in the
rural areas of the nation will be done under the name of Gramin Awaas Yojana . This
new leg of the
main policy Pradhan Mantri Awaas Yojana called the gramin in dedicated only for the
rural masses.
The details of PMAY.
Providing assistance for construction of houses in rural areas over the period
years from 2016 -2017 to 2018 -2019 .
parts of the country. Almost all states and union territories are being targeted
for the
project work . As per records of the ministry of housing GOVT OF INDIA , the govt
analysed
In the rural parts of the countries , it is seen that the maximum people
do not
have suitable houses to live and to nurture their families . The maximum
percentage of
rural population does not have financial strength to build houses of their own .
EMS Housing Scheme
Data’s Details
Project
duration 2016 – 2019
No.of 1 crore
constructed.
Mode of Socio
beneficiary economic
identification and caste
census of
2011
Main National
borrowing Bank for
agency Agriculture
Development
(NABARD)
Labour Mahatma
allocation Gandhi
body for National
building Rural
pucca Employment
houses
Guarantee
ACT
IAY is the flagship rural housing scheme which is being implemented by the
Goverenment of India with an aim of providing shelter to the poor below poverty line . The
Government of India with an aim of providing shelter to the poor below poverty line . The
Government of India has decided that allocation of funds under IAY (Indira Awaas Yogana) will
be on the basis of poverty ratio and housing shortage . The Ministry of Rural Development in
India looks after the rural development and takes care of the rural needs . IAY is one of the many
programmes of the Ministry Ruralv Development . IAY deals with the housing issue and
promises to provide shelter to shelterless . It fulfills the housing need of poor rural people who
are living below the poverty line (BPL) .
Indira Awaas Yojana came in 1985 – 86 as an part of the Rural Landless Employment
Guarantee Programme (RLEGP ) . It was launched to provide uniformity in the policy of rural
housing . There were schemes even before IAY but some schemes used to provide the complete
housing and others used to provide the complete housing and others used to bear just the cost of
construction . IAY continued to be a sub scheme of Jawahar Rozgar Yojana .
Objectives
The objective of IAY is primarily to help construction of new dwelling units as well as
conversion of un serviceable kutcha houses in to pucca / semi - pucca by members of
SC / ST , rural poor below the poverty line by expanding them grant in -aid.
Scope
Funding
IAY is a centrally sponsored scheme funded on cost sharing basis between the Govt of India and
the states in the ratio of 75 : 25 respectively .
Table.3.1…..
Allocation and utilization for wage employment programme…
Programmes 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
MGNREGA Allocation 200000 250000 291230 336950
Utilisation 200000 223000 289120 328310
(100%) (89.2%) (99.2%) (97.4%)
Agricultural loan Allocation 540620 823900 191650 150000
Utilisation 530200 823000 191650 111620
(98%) (99.8%) (100%) (74.4%)
MGNREGA
400000
350000
300000
250000 Allocation
Utilisation
200000
150000
100000
50000
0
2013 -14 2014 - 15 2015 -16 2016 -17
AGRICULTURAL LOAN
900000
800000
700000
600000
Allocation
500000 Utilisation
400000
300000
200000
100000
0
2013 -14 2014 -15 2015-16 2016-17
Table No… 3.2
Allocation and utilization of fund under social security programmes ….
Social security schemes 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Library Allocation 10000 80000 28400 50000
Utilisation 10000 80000 28400 50000
(100%) (100%) (100%) (100%)
Hospital Allocation 13500 15000 12000 13500
Utilisation 13500 15000 12000 13500
(100%) (100%) (100)% (100)%
School Allocation 75000 82450 76920 85350
Utilisation 75000 82450 76920 85350
(100%) (100%) (100%) (100%)
Anganavadi Allocation 80000 86400 86400 88000
Utilisation 80000 86400 86400 88000
(100%) (100%) (100%) (100%)
LIBRARY
90000
80000
70000
60000
Allocation
50000 Utilisation
40000
30000
20000
10000
0
2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
HOSPITAL
16000
14000
12000
10000 Allocati0n
Utilisation
8000
6000
4000
2000
0
2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
SCHOOL
88000
86000
84000
82000
80000 Allocation
Utilisation
78000
76000
74000
72000
70000
68000
2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
ANGANAVADI
90000
88000
86000
Allocation
84000 Utilisation
82000
80000
78000
76000
2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Table.3.3….
Fund allocation and utilization of Rural Housing schemes…..
Programmes 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
EMS Housing Allocation 5270200 2440000 3874845 6553185
schemes
Utilisation 5270200 2440000 3874845 6553185
(100%) (100%) (100%) (100%)
IAY Allocation 1302500 2267230 3214300 2050000
Utilisation 1302500 2267230 3214300 2050000
(100%) (100%) (100%) (100%)
3000000
2500000
Allocation
2000000 Utilisation
1500000
1000000
500000
0
2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Table 3.4…..
Allocation and fund utilization of Old Age Pension schemes………….
Programmes 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Old age pension Allocation 94600 125360 11840 232600
schemes
Utilisation 94600 125360 11840 232600
(100%) (100%) (100%) (100%)
200000
150000 Allocation
Utilisation
100000
50000
0
2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Table3.5………..
Total Expenditure Statement….
Particulars 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Revenue reciepts 7511420 6087980 7869265 9435685
Revenue 6846300 5896800 7796400 9428420
expenditure
Balance amount 665120 191180 72865 7286
Percentage of 91.14% 96.8% 99% 99.9%
utilisation
EXPENDITUREAND RECEIPTS
Revenue Receipts Revenue Expenditure Column1
9435685
9428420
7869265
7796400
7511420
6846300
6087980
5896800
PART 2
Table 3.6……
Category No. of respondents Percentage
Below 25 5 10
25-35 9 18
35-45 15 30
Above 45 21 42
50 100
AGE OF RESPONDENTS
Below 25 25-35 35-45 Above 45
10%
18%
42%
30%
Table 3.7
Qualification wise classification
Qualification No. of respondents Percentage
SSLC 27 54
Plus two 10 20
Graduate 13 26
Post graduate 0 0
Total 50 100
QUALIFCATION OF RESPONDENTS
SSLC Plus two Graduate Post graduate
26%
54%
20%
Table 3.8………
Occupation No. of responents Percentage
Agriculture 24 48
Coolie 11 22
Profession 0 0
Others 15 30
Total 50 100
OCCUPATION
Agriculture Coolie Profession Others
30%
48%
22%
Table 3.9………..
Monthly Income wise classification…………
Monthly Income No.of respondents Percentage
Below 3000 18 36
3000-5000 12 24
5000-7000 20 40
Above 7000 0 0
Total 50 100
MONTHLY INCOME
Below 3000 3000-5000 5000-7000 above 7000
36%
40%
24%
Table.3.10……….
Awareness about programmes.
Awareness No of respondents Percentage
Aware 20 40
Not aware 30 60
Total 50 100
AWARENESS
Aware Not aware
40%
60%
Table 3.11…..
Conducting awareness programmes by the LSG………..
Category No. of respondents Percentage
Yes 18 36
No 32 64
Total 50 100
AWARENESS PROGRAMMES
Yes No
36%
64%
Table 3.12………
Source of Awareness……………
Source No.of respondents Percentage
Gramasabha 25 50
Advertisement 3 6
Newspaper 15 30
Officers 7 14
Total 50 100
SOURCE OF AWARENESS
Gramasabha Advetisement Newspaper Officers Total
25%
50%
3%
7% 15%
Table 3.13…………
Benificiaries list……….
Benefit No. of respondents Percentage
Yes 38 76
No 12 24
Total 50 100
BENEFICIARIES LIST
Yes No
24%
76%
Table 3.14…….
Most preferred programmes………….
Programme No. of respondents Percentage
Wage employment 9 18
programme
Social security programme 12 24
Rural husing programmes 24 48
Old age pension scheme 5 10
Total 50 100
PREFERRED PROGRAMMES
Wage employment programme social security programme
Rural housing programmes old age pension scheme
10% 18%
24%
48%
Table 3.15…
Changes in standard of living
Change No. of respondents Percentage
Increase 30 60
Not increase 20 40
Total 50 100
40%
60%
Table 3.16………
56%
24%
Table 3.17…………
Are you a beneficiary of more than one programme?……..
Category No. of respondents Percentage
Yes 50 100
No 0 0
Total 50 100
Benificiary of
more than one programme
Yes No
100%
Table 3.18……….
Most beneficial programme…………….
Programme No.of respondents Percentage
Wage employment 15 30
programme
Social security programmes 11 22
Rural housing schemes 16 32
Old age pension schemes 8 16
Total 50 100
35%
37%
25%
Table 3.19………
Do you receive any training programe?..........
Category No.of respondents Percentage
Yes 10 20
No 40 80
Total 50 100
BENEFICIARIES OF TRAINING
PROGRAMMES
Yes No
20%
80%
Table.3.20………
Is there any Improvement in economic condition of your panchayath after the implementation of
these programmes?..........
Category No.of respondents Percentage
Yes 30 60
No 20 40
Total 50 100
40%
60%
Table 3.21………
Opinion about the poverty alleviation programmes…………
Opinion No. of respondents percentage
Highly satisfied 0 0
Satisfied 22 44
Not satisfied 28 56
Total 50 100
44%
56%
INTERVIEW SCHEDULE
1.Name :
3.Age : Below 25
25-35
35-45
Above 45
4. No of members in the family :
5.Education : Below 25
Plus two
Graduate
PG
6. Occupation : Agriculture
Business
Profession
Others
7. No of children’s schooling in the family :
3000-5000
5000-7000
Above 7000
No
10. Whether proper awareness programmes conducted by Local Self Government : Yes
No
11. Sources of these awareness programmes: Gramasabha
Newspaper
Advertisement
Officers
No
13. To which of the following programmes you are benefited:
Yes
No
15.How much changes affected in your standard of living?
No change
Some extent
Great extent
16.Are you a beneficiary of more than one programme?
Yes
No
17.Which programme is most beneficial for you?
Yes
No
19.Do you feel any change in economic condition in your panchayath after implementing these
programmes?
Yes
No
20.Opinion about the following
Improving the quality of life
Highly satisfied
Satisfied
Not satisfied