Some Issues Regarding The People of Innovation
Some Issues Regarding The People of Innovation
Some Issues Regarding The People of Innovation
Al-Aqeedah
Some issues regarding the people of bida’
Introduction
In the Name of Allah the Most Beneficent the Most Merciful.
All success on the Day of Judgment is dependent upon the slave’s fulfilment of the two
testimonies: Lā ilāha illa Allāh, Muhammadu Rasūlullāh. Therefore it is extremely important to
study the meaning of these two and what they necessitate and demand from the slave in
order for him not to be negligent in these.
As we have learned from the rights and conditions of Lā ilāha illa Allāh is that the slave must
leave the major shirk by not worshipping tāghūt, he must hate shirk, declare takfīr upon
whoever worships tāghūt and hate and disassociate himself from these people.
Likewise from the rights and conditions of Muhammadu Rasūlullāh is that the slave must
leave any form of bida’ (innovation in religion) by following the Messenger of Allah
(sallAllāhu alayhi wa sallam) in everything that he came with, he must hate bida’, declare tabdī’1
upon whoever adopts a bid’ah and hate and disassociate himself from these people.
The reason for this is that the person who adopts a bid’ah is a person who has not found
sufficiency in the Messenger of Allah (sallAllāhu alayhi wa sallam) and he has deviated from
his (sallAllāhu alayhi wa sallam) teachings and his manhaj. The salaf would regard as a major
thing if a person turns away from the words of the Messenger (sallAllāhu alayhi wa sallam)
for the words of someone else among the Sahābah (radiAllāhu ‘anhum), then how about the
one who turns away from his (sallAllāhu alayhi wa sallam) words for intellect, philosophy,
lust and desires?!
Imam Ahmad – rahimahullāh – narrated from Ibn ’Abbās (radiAllāhu ’anhu) that he said:
“I see that they will be destroyed. I say: ‘The Prophet (sallAllāhu alayhi wa sallam) said (it is
allowed)’, and he says: ‘Abū Bakr and ‘Umar forbade it.’” (Musnad Imām Ahmad)
So by the permission of Allah we seek to clarify how the salaf would perform the rights and
conditions of the testimony of Muhammadu Rasūlullāh, by not giving anything priority over
the Sunnah, and completing the barā’ah (disassociation) from the people of bida’, hating them
and warning against them, all as a protection of the Sunnah and out of love and respect for
the religion and its Divine sources; Al-Qurān and As-Sunnah.
2
Some issues regarding the people of bida’
‘Abdur-Rahmān ibn Muljim (died 40 after hijrah) who was from the Khawārij and he
was the killer of ‘Alī ibn Abū Tālib (radiAllahu ‘anhu).
َََُّث،ََوهو َمع َذلك َي قرَ َسورةَ َاق رَ َِبسمَ َربكَ َالَّذي َخلقََإَل َآخرها،َ َاَّلل َبن َجعف ٍَر َقطع َيديه َورجليه َوكحلت َعي ناه
َّ َإ ََّنَعبد:َوقد َقيل
ََّ َو.ٍََُثََّق َ لوهَُثَََّرقوهَفَق وصَّرة،ََُثََّقطَعواَلسانه.ََاَّللَفيها
َاَّلل َّ َإّنََخشىََنََتَّرَعل َّيَساعةٌََلََذكر:ََوقال،َجاءواَلي قطعواَلسانهَفجزع
. ََعلم
“And it was verily said: Verily ‘Abdullāh ibn Ja’far cut off his two hands and two feet, and kuhl was
applied to his eyes. And he along with this recited the sūrah: ‘Read in the Name of your Lord who
created’, until its ending. Then they came to cut out his tongue so he became afraid and said: ‘I am
scared that an hour will pass me by in which I do not mention Allah’. Then they cut off his tongue.
Then they killed him and burned him in a pediment. And Allah knows best.” (Al-Bidāyah wan-
Nihāyah vol. 7)
Al-Hasan ibn Sālih ibn Haī (died 169 after hijrah) who was among the tābi’īn known
for great fear of Allāh, worship and narration of hadīth. He fell in the bid’ah of the
Khawārij and he would not pray the Jumu’ah (i.e. the Friday prayer) behind the
oppressive ruler.
3
Some issues regarding the people of bida’
”’Abdullāh ibn Imām Ahmad ibn Hanbal (said): I heard Abū Ma’mar say: ’We were with Wakī’, and
when he narrated hadīth from Hasan ibn Sālih we would withhold our hands and not write. So he
said: ‘What is it with you that you do not write the hadith of Hasan?’ So my brother said to him with
his hand like this – i.e. that he would consider the sword (allowed against Muslims) – so Wakī’ became
quiet.” (As-Siyar)
And:
ََماَرَي َه،ًََجالسَهَعشرينَسنة،ََىَالسيف
َّ َوي ر،َلوََلَيولدَ َاْلسنَبنَصالحٍََكانَخ ًَياَلهَ;َيْتكَاْلمعة: َوقالَََْحدَبنَيونسَالَيبوع َُّي
. َوَلَذكرَالدُّن يا،ََالسماء
َّ رفعَرَسهَإَل
”And Ahmad ibn Yūnus Al-Barbū’ī said: ’If Al-Hasan ibn Sālih was not born it would be better for
him. He leaves the Jumu’ah and he considers the sword. I have sat with him for twenty years and I
have never seen him raise his head to the heaven (i.e. complaint) nor would he mention dunyā.” (As-
Siyar)
And:
َيَي وم َُّ قالََالمز: َََعنَََْحد َبن َُم َّم ٍد َالب غدادي،ََالساج َُّي
َُّ َدخلََالثَّور:َ َسعتَََِب َن عي ٍَم َي قول: َََظنُّهَََِب َبك ٍر َاْلث رم-َي شيخنا َّ وقالََزكرََّّي
. َف َح َّولَإَلَساري ٍةََخرى،َََوَخذَن عليه.ََن عوذَِب ََّّللَمنَخشوعَالنفاق:ََف قال،ََفإذاَاْلسنَبنَصالحٍََيصلي،َاْلمعةَمنَالبابَالقبلي
”And Zakariyyā As-Sājī said, from Ahmad ibn Muhammad Al-Baghdādī (who said): Our Shaykh
Al-Mizzī – I think it is Abū Bakr Al-Athram – said: I heard Abū Nu’aym say: ‘Ath-Thawrī entered
on the day of Jumu’ah from the door of Al-Qiblī, when Al-Hasan ibn Sālih was there praying. So he
said: ‘We seek refuge with Allāh from the hypocritical khushu’.’ Then he took his two sandals and he
went to sit at another pole.” (As-Siyar)
Al-Hārith Al-Muhāsabī (died 243 after hijrah) who had many books regarding zuhd
and even books in which he answered to the Mu’tazilah and the Rāfidah. But he
spoke some words of philosophy so the salaf left him and it is narrated that only 4
people attended his funeral.
ََهذهَكَبَبد ٍعَوضَلَل ٍت،َََإ ََّّيكَوهذهَالكَب:ََف قال،ََوسئلَعنََالمحاسِبَ َوكَبه،َي َّ شهدتَََِبَزرعة: َقالََسعيدَبنَعم ٍروَالَبذع َُّي
ََّ َالراز
! . َاوسَ؟َماََسرعَالنَّاسَإَلَالبدع ََّ َهلَب لغكمََ ََّن َمال ًكا َوالثَّور،ًََعليكَِبْلثرََتدَغن ية.
َ يَواْلوزاع ََّيَصنَّفواَفَاْلطراتَوالوس
“Sa’īd ibn ‘Amr Al-Bardha’ī said: I witnesses Abu Zar’ah Ar-Rāzī when he was asked about Al-
Muhāsabī and his books. So he said: ‘Beware against these books. These are the books of bida’ and
4
Some issues regarding the people of bida’
misguidances. Stick to the athar and you will find it sufficient. Has it ever reached you that Mālik,
Ath-Thawrī and Al-Awzā’ī wrote books about al-khatarat2 and al-wasawis3? How fast are people to
fall in bida’.” (As-Siyar)
”I sat with Qatādah when ’Amr ibn ’Ubayd4 was mentioned, so he spoke ill of him, and discredited
him. So I said to him: ‘O Abū Al-Khattāb, I verily see that the scholars they speak ill of each other.’
So he said: ‘O Ahwal, do you not see that a man if he becomes invents an innovation, then it should
be mentioned, so people can take heed.’”(Al-Kamil fi Du’afā Ar-Rijāl)
ََعرفوا:ََف قَال،َإ َّنَهذاَي َكلَّمَفَالقدرََعِنَإب راهيمَبنََبََيَي: َََق لتََلسفيانَبنَعي ي نة:ََقال،َََث ناََبوَجعف ٍرَاْل َّذاء:ََسعتَََبَ َي قول
َََوسلواَربَّكمَالعافية،َالنَّاسَبدعَه
”I heard my father say: From Abū Ja’far Al-Hadhdhā who said: I said to Sufyān ibn ‘Uyaynah: ‘Verily
this man speaks about Al-Qadr, I mean Ibrāhīm ibn Abū Yahyā.’ So he said: ‘Make the people aware
of his bid’ah, and ask your Lord for good health.”(Al-’Ilal wa Marifah Ar-Rijāl)
5
Some issues regarding the people of bida’
”Abū Turāb An-Nakhshabī came to my father, so my father began to say: ’Fulān is da’īf, fulān is
trustworthy.’ So Abū Turāb said: ’O Shaykh, do not backbite the scholars.’ So he (i.e. Ahmad) turned
to him and said to him: ’Woe to you, this is nasīhah, this is not backbiting.’”(Tabaqāt Al-Hanābilah)
”And we have verily found more than one among the leaders from the tābi’īn who verily spoke (ill)
about men, among them are: Al-Hasan Al-Basrī and Tāwūs who both spoke about Ma’bad Al-Juhanī.
And Sa’īd ibn Jubayr spoke regarding Talq ibn Habīb. And Ibrāhīm An-Nakh’ī and ‘Āmir Ash-Sha’nī
spoke regarding Al-Hārith Al-A’war. And likewise was it narrated from Ayyūb As-Sikhtiyānī,
‘Abdullāh ibn ‘Awn, Sulaymān At-Taymī, Shu’bah ibn Al-Hajjāj, Sufyān Ath-Thawrī, Mālik ibn
Anas, Al-Awza’ī, ‘Abdullāh ibn Al-Mubārak, Yahyā ibn Sa’īd Al-Qattān, Wakī’ ibn Al-Jarrāh,
Abdur-Rahmān ibn Mahdī and others than them from the people of knowledge, that they spoke about
men and discredited (them). And verily what made them to do this in our opinion – and Allāh knows
best – is the well-wishing for the Muslims. It is not thought regarding them that they wanted to
defame people or discredit them. In our opinion what they wanted was to clarify the weakness in these
people in order for them to be known. Because some of those whom they described as weak (in
narration) were people of innovation, and some of them were accused in hadīth (of lying) and some of
them were people of ghaflah and much mistakes. So these leaders wanted to clarify their situations
out of fear for the religion, and as an affirmation. Because the testimony in religion is more deserving
of being established than the testimony regarding the rights and the wealth.”(Kitāb Al-’Ilal)
6
Some issues regarding the people of bida’
Ibn ’Umar (radiAllahu ’anhu) said regarding the people who did not believe in al-Qadar
(Divine Decree):
“If you met those people then inform them that I am free from them and they are free from me.” (Sahīh
Muslim)
This bara’ah (disassociation, being free from) is interpreted with the meanings found in the
following quotes:
“And Abū Qilābah said – and he met more than one of the companions of the Messenger of Allāh
(sallAllāhu alayhi wa sallam): ‘Do not sit with the people of hawā5.’ Or he said: ‘(Do not sit with) the
people of disputes, because I verily don’t feel secure from them submerging you in their misguidance
or that they will make some of that which you already know doubtful for you.’ (As-Sunnah by
‘Abdullāh)
5Hawā: Lust, desire, mishuidance. The people of hawā are those who believe in something that contradicts the
guidance of the Messenger (sallAllāhu alayhi wa sallam), from the innovations, opinions, misguidances etc.
7
Some issues regarding the people of bida’
“And two men from the people of hawā entered upon Muhammad ibn Sīrīn and said: ’O Abū Bakr,
we will narrate a hadith to you.’ He said: ‘No’. They said: ‘Then we will recite a verse from the Book
of Allāh – the Mighty and Majestic – for you.’ He said: ‘No. Either you will get up away from me, or
I will get up (away from you).’ He said: So the two men got up and went out. So some of the people
said: ‘O Abū Bakr, what would it harm you if they recited a verse from the Book of Allāh the Mighty
and Majestic.’ So Muhammad ibn Sīrīn said: ‘I verily fear that they would recite a verse for me, and
they would distort it and that would be established in my heart.’” (As-Sunnah by ‘Abdullāh)
“And a man from the people of bida' (innovation) said to Ayyūb As-Sakhtiyānī: ‘O Abū Bakr, I want
to ask you about a word.’ So he turned away while he said with his hand: ‘No, and not even half of a
word.’” (As-Sunnah by ‘Abdullāh)
“And Ibn Tāwūs said to one of his sons while a man from the people of bida' was speaking: ‘O my
son. Put your two fingers in your ears so you cannot hear what he is saying.’ Then he said: ’Squeeze,
squeeze.’” (As-Sunnah by ‘Abdullāh)
8
Some issues regarding the people of bida’
“My father narrated to me from ‘Aswad ibn ‘Āmir, from Ja’far ibn Ziyād, i.e. Al-Ahmar, from
Hamzah Az-Zayyāt, from Abū Al-Mukhtār who said: ’Dhar6 complained over Sa’īd ibn Jubayr to
Abū Al-Baktarī At-Ta’i and said: ’I passed him by and greeted him, but he did not return my
greeting.’ So Abū Al-Baktarī mentioned this to Sa’īd ibn Jubayr, so Sa’īd said: ’Verily this man
follows a new religion every day. No by Allāh, I will never speak to him.” (As-Sunnah by
‘Abdullāh)
”My father narrated to me, from Ismā’īl, from Ayyūb who said: Sa’īd ibn Jubayr said without anyone
asking him or anyone mentioning it to him: ’Do not sit with Talq’, i.e. because he has the opinion of
Al-Murjiah.” (As-Sunnah by ‘Abdullāh)
6. Criticizing whoever would sit with them or defends them and even accusing the one
who does for having the same religion as them:
ََدعوَنَمن:َماَتقولونَفَالرجلَُيالسََهلَالسنةَوخيالطهم؛َفإذاَذكرََهلَالبدعَقال:كنتَعندََرطأةَبنَاملنذرَفقالَبعضََهلَاجمللس
ًََفقدمتَعلىَاْلوزاعيَوكانَكشَّافا،َفأنكرتَذلكَمنَقولََرطأة:َقال،"َ"هوَمنهمََلَيلبسَعليكمََمره:ذكرهمََلَتذكروهم؟َفقالََرطأة
ََوقالَاْلوزاعي."!َومَّتََيذرواَإذاََلَيشادَبذكرهم؟،َهذاَينهيَعنَذكرهم،َوالقولَماَقال،َ"صدقََرطأة:َفقال،!َلذهَاْلشياءَإذاَبلغَه
((.َوَلفََنهَعلىَغَيَرَيهَفَلَتصدقه،َ((إذاَرَيَهَميشيَمعَصاَبَبدعة:رْحهَهللا
“I was with Artaah ibn Al-Mundhir when some people from the gathering said: ‘What do you say
about a man who sits with the people of Sunnah and mixes with them, but when the people of bida’
are mentioned he says: ‘Leave us from mentioning them, do not mention them’?’ So Artaah said: ‘He
is from them (i.e. the people of bida’), do not be confused regarding him.’ He said: ‘So I disliked this
from the words of Artaah. Then I came to Al-Awzā’ī, and he was a pathfinder for these things if they
reached him. So he said: ‘Artaah has spoken the truth. And the (correct) opinion is what he said. That
person forbids to mention them. Then when will they be warned if he doesn’t speak out mentioning
them?’ And Al-Awzā’ī – rahimahullāh – said: ‘If you see him walking with an innovator and he
9
Some issues regarding the people of bida’
swears that he does not hold the same opinions as him, then do not believe him.’” (Tārikh Dimashq
by Ibn ’Asākir)
”Abū Bakr ibn Abū Shaybah narrated to me, from Ishāq ibn Mansūr As-Salūlī, from Mansūr ibn
Abū Al-Aswad, from Al-’Amash, from Habīb who said: ’I was with Sa’īd ibn Jubayr in a masjid when
we mentioned Dhar in our conversation, so he spoke ill of him. So I said: ’O Abū ’Abdullāh. Verily
he only speaks good words about you when he mentions you.’ So he said: ‘Do you not see that he is
misguided renewing his religion every day.’” (As-Sunnah by ‘Abdullāh)
And this is truly the sign of ikhlās (sincerity) in this issue and that it is exclusively done for
the sake of Allah the Exalted.
َََّي َمعشر:َاَّلل َبن َالمبارك ٍَ ََسعت َعل َّي َبن َاْلسن َبن َشق،َوُم َّمد َبن َعبد َالعزيز َبن ََب َرزمة،َدَّثِن ََبوَعمر
َّ َقال َرج ٌل َلعبد:َيَقول،يق
»ََ«رمي َِنَِب ًوىَمنَاْلهواء:َقال،المرجئَة
”Abū ‘Umar narrated to me, from Muhamad ibn Abdul-’Azīz ibn Abū Rimzah who said that he
heard ‘Alī ibn Al-Hasan ibn Shaqīq say: ’A man said to ‘Abdullāh ibn Al-Mubārak: ’O people of
Murjiah.’ So he said: ’Are you accusing me of a misguidance among the misguidances?’” (As-
Sunnah by ‘Abdullāh)
10
Some issues regarding the people of bida’
”Suwayd narrated to me, from Muhammad ibn Harb Al-Abrash, from Abū Bakr ibn Abū Maryam,
from Yazīd ibn Shurayh, from Abū Idrīs Al-Khawlānī that he used to say: ’That I see a fire in the
corner of the masjid spreading is more beloved to me than seeing a bid’ah which is not changed.’”
(As-Sunnah by ‘Abdullāh)
َيم
ٌ َور ََّر َّ ىَاَّللََنَي َوبَعليَهمََۚإ َّن
ٌ َاَّللَغف َّ وآخرونَاعْتفواَبذنوِبمَخلطواَعم ًَلَصاْلًاَوآخرَسيئًاَعس
“And other who acknowledged their mistakes. They mixed some good deeds with other
bad deeds. Perhaps Allah will forgive them. Verily Allah is Forgiving and Most Merciful.”
(At-Tawbah 9:102)
“’Abdullāh ibn Ahmad narrated to us and said: My father narrated to me and said: Hushaym
narrated to us and said: Ismā’īl ibn Sālim narrated to us, from Abū Idrīs – and one time he said Al-
Azdī – who said: ‘Some people among the zanādiqah who apostatized from Islām was brought to ‘Alī
(ibn Abū Tālib). Then he asked them (regarding their kufr) but they rejected (having performed it),
and the evidences of righteous people (i.e. witnesses) was established against them.’ He said: ‘So he
killed them and did not ask them to repent.’ He said: ‘And a man who used to be Christian and then
11
Some issues regarding the people of bida’
embraces Islām, and then again left Islām was brought to him.’ He said: ‘So he asked him (regarding
his kufr) and he acknowledged what he had done. Then he asked him to repent and he left him.’ So it
was said to him: ‘Why did he ask him to repent when he did not ask those (zanādiqah) to repent?’ He
said: ‘This man acknowledged what he had done, but these did not acknowledge even when the
evidences was established against them. So due to this he did not ask them to repent.’” (Ahl Al-Milal
war-Riddah by Al-Khallāl hadīth no. 135)
“And Ahmad said in the narration of Al-Marrūdhī regarding a man against whom it is witnessed
that he has a bid’ah and then he rejects this that he does not have a tawbah. Verily the tawbah is for
the one who acknowledges.”
2. Rectifying what he has caused of damage and clarifying this for the people by showing
his tawbah and previous bida’.
َََلَيقبلَهللاَذلكَمنهَََّتَيظهرَالَوبة:َفقال،َوَنهََتبَمنَزلَه،َكانتَلهَزلة،كرَْلبَعبدَهللاََْحدَبنََنبلَرجل َمنََهلَالعلم
ٌ ذ
ََُث،َفإذاَظهرَذلكَمنهََينئذَتقبل،َورجعَعنه،َوَنهََتبَإَلَهللاَتعاَلَمنَمقالَه،َوليعلمنََنهَقالَمقالَهَكيتَوكيت،والرجوعَعنَمقالَه
]53/1ََ[ذيلَطبقاتَاْلنابلة.)}تَلََبوَعبدَاَّللَ{إَلََّاَالذينََتبواَوَصلحواَوب يَّ نوا
“A man from the people of knowledge who had a mistake was mentioned to Abū ‘Abdullāh Ahmad
ibn Hanbal, and that the man had repented from his mistake. So he said: ‘Allah will not accept that
from him until he openly declares his repentance and that he has taken back what he used to say. And
it must verily be known that he said such and such saying (i.e. the mistake) and that he has repented
from that to Allāh from his saying and taken it back. Then if this becomes clear from him then it is
accepted.’ Then Abū ‘Abdullāh recited: “Except those who repent and correct themselves and
clarify. (Al-Baqarah 2:160)” (Dhayl Tabaqāt Al-Hanābilah 1/53)
12
Some issues regarding the people of bida’
3. That his effort in showing his tawbah is equal to the effort he put in his bida’, and if
he had more than one bida’ to show the tawbah for each one.
ََفأَن:َفقالَالرجل،َإذاَخرجتَمنَعندي؛َفَلَتعدَإِل:َفقال،َنعم:ََنتَذاكَاْلهمي؟َقال:َفقالَله،كناَعندَابنَاملباركَإذَجاءهَرجل
ََلَََّتَيظهرَمنَتوبَكَمثلَالذيَظهرَمنَبدعَك:َقال،َتئب
”We were with Ibn Al-Mubārak when a man came to him. So he said to him: ‘Are you that Jahmī?’
He said: ‘Yes’. So he said: ‘When you leave me, then do not come back to me.’ So the man said: ‘But
I am repenting.’ He said: ’No. Not until you show from your tawbah what you have shown from your
bid’ah.’” (Al-Ibānah Al-Kubrā 1/147-148)
If he was a mubtadi’ not speaking publicly about his bida’ then there is no need for him to
publicly declare this. But if he was outspoken in his bida’ then he must speak the truth and
clarify in the same places where he has spoken falsehood and called to it.
َ،َ َيَِب َّكة َّ إنَلقيتَََِبَعبد: ٍَََف قالَِلََاْلسنََبنَصالح،ََردتَاْل َّج: َََعنََزافرَبنَسليمان،َوقالََالعَلءَبنَعم ٍروَاْلنف َُّي
ََّ َاَّللَسفيانَالثَّور
َّ َإ َّن ََخاكََاْلسن َبن َصالحٍََي قرَ َعَليك:َ َف قلت،َ ََف لقيتََسفيانََف َالطَّوا.َ َََن َعلىَاْلمر َاْل َّول:َ َوقل،َ َالسَلم
َ،َ َالسَلم َّ فأقره َمِن
ََفماَِبلَاْلمعةَ؟:َ قال. ََََنَعلىَاْلمرَاْل َّول:َوي قول
ََف قال،َََجاءّنََسفَيان:َ َقال،َََعنََخ ََّلد َبن َيزيد،ََ عب يد َبن َيعيش. ََبزعمه،َ َوَل َي راهاَخلف ََئ َّمة َاْلور،َ َكان َيْتك َاْلمعة:َ ق لت
. ََُثََّقامَفذهب.ََيْتكَاْلمعة،َاْلسنَبنَصالحٍََمعَماََسعَمنَالعلمَوف قه:
“’Alā ibn ‘Amr Al-Hanafī said, from Zāfir ibn Sulaymān (who said): ‘I wanted to perform hajj, so
Al-Hasan ibn Sālih7 said to me: If you meet Abū ‘Abdullāh Sufyān Ath-Thawrī in Makkah then give
him my greetings, and say that I am one the first issue (i.e. I changed my opinion regarding the
sword).’ So I met Sufyān in Tawāf and said: ‘Verily your brother Al-Hasan ibn Sālih is giving you
his greetings and he says: I am on the first issue.’ So he said: ‘And what about (the issue of) al-
Jumu’ah?’
I said: He used to leave the Jumu’ah, and would not consider it to be prayed behind the oppressive
rulers, according to his claim. ‘Ubayd ibn Ya’īsh (narrated) from Khallād ibn Yazīd who said: ‘Sufyān
7The man from the tābi’īn which have been mentioned earlier in this text. He was a man of knowledge but he
fell in the bid’ah of allowing the sword against the Muslims and not prayer the Jumu’ah behind a sinning Imām.
13
Some issues regarding the people of bida’
came to me and said: ‘Al-Hasan ibn Sālih along with everything that he has heard of the knowledge
and what he has understood leaves (praying) the Jumu’ah.’ Then he got up and left.”
4. That he disassociates from the people of bida’ which he previously agreed with.
Note: The mubtadi’ thinks that he is upon haqq while he is adopting some or more aspects in
his religion which contradict the Qurān and the Sunnah according to the understanding of
the salaf. It is therefore necessary that he acknowledges that he was mistaken, clarify his
mistake and openly shows his tawbah in order to prove that he now knows that he was not
upon haqq before and that his previous opinions were unacceptable according to the Shar’
(Islamic Law). This serves as a rectifier of himself along with the people he has infected with
his bida’ and as a protection of the religion. The people today who ascribe to Islām and
commit shirk at the same time and openly show their shirk are required to go through the
same steps as the innovator due to the similarity between their situations. These mushrikūn
ascribing themselves to Islām also think that their misguidance is a part of Islām and
perhaps they invite towards it, and therefore they must acknowledge that they have been
mushrikūn, openly declare their tawbah, disassociate from the people of shirk and invite
towards Tawhīd where they have invited towards shirk.
May the peace and abundant blessings be upon our Prophet Muhammad, his family and
companions, and whoever follows them in goodness until the Day of Judgment.
Abū Hājar
14