Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

2023 9 29 47431 Order 06-Oct-2023

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

1

ITEM NO.29 COURT NO.9 SECTION XV

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 38962/2023

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19-05-2023


in DBCSAW No. 568/2022 19-05-2023 in DBCSAW No. 530/2022 19-05-2023
in DBCSAW No. 531/2022 passed by the High Court Of Judicature For
Rajasthan At Jaipur)

VISHNU DATT SAINI & ORS. Petitioner(s)


VERSUS

THE RAJASTHAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION & ORS. Respondent(s)

( IA No.198146/2023-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA


No.198147/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT
and IA No.198145/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA
No.198150/2023-PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..) )

Date : 06-10-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY


HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KAROL

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Puneet Jain, Adv.


Ms. Christi Jain, AOR
Mr. Vigyan Shah, Adv.
Mr. Yogit Kamat, Adv.
Mr. Mann Arora, Adv.
Mr. Akriti Sharma, Adv.
Ms. Shruti Singh, Adv.
Mr. Akshit Gupta, Adv.

For Respondent(s) Mr. Rajshekhar Rao, Sr. Adv.


Mr. Yuvraj Samant, Adv.
Ms. Neha Amola, Adv.
Ms. Meherunissa Anand Jaitley, Adv.
Mr. Yashraj Samant, Adv.
Mr. Pritish Narayan Ray, Adv.
Mr. Rajesh Singh Chauhan, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following


Signature Not Verified
O R D E R
Digitally signed by
Jayant Kumar Arora
Date: 2023.10.09

Permission to file Special Leave Petition is granted.


18:13:26 IST
Reason:

Delay condoned.
2

Mr. Puneet Jain, learned counsel would refer to the selection

procedure prescribed in the advertisement by the Rajasthan Public

Service Commission for appointment of Veterinary Officer and also

the Rule 19 of the Rajasthan Animal Husbandry Service Rules, 1963

to argue that the sequence of the selection process notified by the

Rules and the advertisement, was not adhered to. To be specific,

the counsel submits that on the basis of screening test done which

contains 40 marks, the qualified candidates were shortlisted for

interview and the marks to be awarded for the academic

qualifications were given a play in the selection, only thereafter.

Issue notice, returnable in four weeks.

The Rajasthan Public Service Commission is represented by Mr.

Rajshekar Rao, learned Senior Counsel. He submits that at present

the interview of the shortlisted candidates are continuing.

Taking note of the above, the interviews are not interdicted.

However appointment should not be made without the leave of the

Court.

[DEEPAK JOSHI] [KAMLESH RAWAT]


COURT MASTER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

You might also like