Revision File Thesis
Revision File Thesis
Revision File Thesis
A Thesis
Presented to the
Tagbilaran City
In Partial Fulfillment
MAJOR IN MATHEMATICS
APRIL 2024
ii
APPROVAL SHEET
THESIS COMMITTEE
-----------------------------------------------------------
PANEL OF EXAMINERS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
individuals who shared their time and effort. From the very
of this research.
Math teachers who have given their consent for the full
study.
- The Researchers
v
DEDICATION
- The Researchers
vi
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TITLE PAGE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i
APPROVAL SHEET . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iii
DEDICATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v
TABLE OF CONTENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vi
CHAPTER PAGE
INTRODUCTION
Rationale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Related Literature . . . . . . . . . . . 2
THE PROBLEM
Statement of Hypothesis . . . . . . . . 19
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Research Design . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
Research Instruments . . . . . . . . . 23
Statistical Treatment . . . . . . . . . 25
DEFINITION OF TERMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
vii
REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
CURRICULUM VITAE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
Chapter 1
INTRODUCTION
Rationale
components.
primary.
Literature Background
meaningful contexts.
2 of Article VIII.
Educational Development
Theory of Conceptual Decree of 1972 Section 5
Understanding (f)
- Kilpatrick,
Swafford, and
Findell (2001) Batas Pambansa Blg. 232
“Education Act of 1982”
Variation Theory of
Learning Code of Ethics for
- Marton and Tsui Professional Teachers,
(2004) Section 2 of Article
VIII
presumed.
2001)
linked, they are easier to retain and apply, and they can be
conceptual comprehension.
Booth, 1997)
various variables.
information is presented.
Legal Bases
10
students.
learners are his and foremost concern and shall handle each
learning approaches.
productive citizens.
learn. These are the reasons why students are eager to learn
teaching approach.
Math Model'. Despite its name, the Singapore bar model (like
is more relevant.
mathematics.
(Evans, L. 2023)
2016-2017.
groups.
18
THE PROBLEM
following questions:
groups?
learning practices?
Statement of Hypotheses
difference in the:
tests in Mathematics.
20
Math Method.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
21
Design
all groups.
Table 1
Mean Difference of the Pupils’ Mathematics Final Grade in
Grade Four of the Experimental and Control Group
Instruments
test test papers were of the same content. The items were
derived from primary math books and some sources that are
Specification.
24
mathematical knowledge.
25
Statistical Treatment
statistical treatment.
Scores Description
24-30 Excellent
12-17 Good
6-11 Fair
0-5 Poor
x 1−x 2
t=
√
2 2
s1 + s2
+
n1 n2
where:
t = computed t-value
2
s1= variance of score of the first group
2
s2 = variance of score of the second group
D−μ D
t=
SD
√n
where:
t = computed t-value
n = number of respondents
27
DEFINITION OF TERMS
learning by doing.
28
subject.
REFERENCE LIST
CURRICULUM
33
VITAE
PERSONAL BACKGROUND
Email: scl.castrodes@gmail.com
Age: 23
Sex: Female
Citizenship: Filipino
No. of Sibling/s: 2
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
PERSONAL BACKGROUND
Email: lopenachristine@gmail.com
Age: 21
Sex: Female
Citizenship: Filipino
No. of Sibling/s: 2
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
PERSONAL BACKGROUND
Email: nyljan20@gmail.com
Age: 21
Sex: Male
Citizenship : Filipino
No. of Sibling/s: 3
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
Primary : Tagbilaran City Central Elementary School
Poblacion II, Tagbilaran City, Bohol
2009 to 2010