Ebook Family Medicine Principles and Practice Paul M Paulman Editor Online PDF All Chapter
Ebook Family Medicine Principles and Practice Paul M Paulman Editor Online PDF All Chapter
Ebook Family Medicine Principles and Practice Paul M Paulman Editor Online PDF All Chapter
https://ebookmeta.com/product/principles-and-practice-of-stress-
management-fourth-edition-paul-m-lehrer/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/principles-and-practice-of-
hospital-medicine-sylvia-c-mckean/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/social-emergency-medicine-
principles-and-practice-1st-edition-harrison-j-alter-preeti-
dalawari-kelly-m-doran-maria-c-raven/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/davidsons-principles-and-practice-
of-medicine-24th-edition-stuart-ralston/
Obstetrics in Family Medicine A Practical Guide 3rd
Edition Paul Lyons Nathan Mclaughlin
https://ebookmeta.com/product/obstetrics-in-family-medicine-a-
practical-guide-3rd-edition-paul-lyons-nathan-mclaughlin/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/social-emergency-medicine-
principles-and-practice-harrison-j-alter-editor-preeti-dalawari-
editor-kelly-m-doran-editor-maria-c-raven-editor/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/primary-mathematics-3a-hoerst/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/delisa-s-physical-medicine-and-
rehabilitation-principles-and-practice-6th-edition-walter-r-
frontera-editor-in-chief/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/davidsons-principles-and-practice-
of-medicine-23rd-edition-ian-d-penman-bschons-md-frcpe-editor/
Paul M. Paulman
Robert B. Taylor
Audrey A. Paulman
Laeth S. Nasir
Editors
Family
Medicine
Principles and Practice
Eighth Edition
Family Medicine
Paul M. Paulman • Robert B. Taylor •
Audrey A. Paulman • Laeth S. Nasir
Editors
Family Medicine
Principles and Practice
Eighth Edition
This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
“Thanks to all family physicians and others who provide primary
care to their patients; without you, there would be no reason to
publish this book.”
Preface to the Eighth Edition
Stay well.
For the editors,
Omaha, USA Paul M. Paulman
December 2021 Lead Editor
vii
Preface to the First Edition
ix
x Preface to the First Edition
The editor expresses appreciation to the 128 contributing authors and to the
four associate editors: John L. Buckingham, E. P. Donatelle, William E. Jacott,
and Melville G. Rosen. Also gratefully acknowledged is the cooperation of the
American Academy of Family Physicians, The American Board of Family
Practice, the College of Family Physicians of Canada, and the Society of
Teachers of Family Medicine. My family – Anita, Diana, and Sharon – shared
in the preparation of this book, as did literally hundreds of other persons too
numerous to list individually, and to whom the editors, authors, and readers are
indebted.
R.B.T
Acknowledgments
We dedicate this book to all the workers who labored to keep us healthy, fed,
and safe during the COVID-19 pandemic. There will never be adequate
recognition or rewards for these incredible men and women; nevertheless,
we’d like to add our thanks.
We have many more people to thank: Dr. Robert Taylor has continued to
inspire us in his role as founder of this series of reference books; his advice and
counsel have been invaluable.
Saskia Ellis, our production manager, provided a steady, consistent guiding
hand throughout the production process. When it seemed that we had reached
insurmountable roadblocks, Saskia was there to let us know how much
progress we had made and how we weren’t THAT far behind schedule. We
appreciate your work, Saskia!
Sylvia Blago has also been inspirational for us and has helped us keep our
eye on the prize. Having worked with Sylvia on previous projects, we have had
great production experiences and she did not disappoint during this project.
Thank you, Sylvia.
Our chapter authors came through with great material, while also caring for
their patients and keeping themselves and their families safe from the virus. We
are in your debt.
Personal thanks to Dr. Audrey Paulman and Dr. Laeth Nasir, volume
editors, for their great efforts to recruit chapter authors and overcome any
and all problems in order to bring this book to publication. We look forward to
future editions of this reference book from Dr. Laeth Nasir and his team. Future
editions of this book will be outstanding.
xi
Contents
Volume 1
6 Clinical Prevention . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
Roger J. Zoorob, Maria C. Mejia, and Robert S. Levine
7 Health Promotion and Wellness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95
Jennifer Dalrymple, Kristen Dimas, Rose Anne Illes, and
Tyler Spradling
8 Health Care of the International Traveler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107
Timothy Herrick
xiii
xiv Contents
67 Headache . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 875
D. Garcia and Faraz Ghoddusi
68 Epilepsy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 889
Shailendra Saxena, Sanjay Singh, Ram Sankaraneni, and
Kanishk Makhija
69 Cerebrovascular Disease . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 905
Kamal C. Wagle and Cristina S. Ivan
70 Movement Disorders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 923
Douglas J. Inciarte and Diego R. Torres-Russotto
xviii Contents
Volume 2
79 Hypertension . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1043
Kenyon Railey, Mallory Mc Clester Brown, and
Anthony J. Viera
80 Ischemic Heart Disease . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1055
Devdutta G. Sangvai, Ashley M. Rietz, and Anthony J. Viera
81 Cardiac Arrhythmias . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1065
Cecilia Gutierrez and Esmat Hatamy
82 Valvular Heart Disease . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1087
Sophia Malary Carter, Wendy Bocaille, and
Santos Reyes-Alonso
83 Heart Failure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1101
Sandra Chaparro and Michael Rivera-Rodríguez
84 Cardiovascular Emergencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1117
Andrea Maritato and Francesco Leanza
Contents xix
xxiii
xxiv Contributors
Wendy Bocaille West Kendal Baptist Hospital FIU Family Medicine Resi-
dency Program, Miami, FL, USA
Louisa Foster The Center for Mindful Living, Omaha, NE, USA
D. Garcia 96th Medical Group, Eglin Air Force Base, FL, USA
Faraz Ghoddusi 9th Medical Group, Beale Air Force Base, Beale AFB, CA,
USA
Erin Wendt David Grant Family Medicine Residency Program, David Grant
Medical Center, Fairfield, CA, USA
Ryan West Nellis Family Medicine Residency, Nellis AFB, Las Vegas, NV,
USA
xxxviii Contributors
xxxix
xl Abbreviations
Contents
A Short History of the Specialty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Family Medicine as a Social Movement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Family Medicine as a Defense of General Practice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Family Medicine as a Reform Movement Within Medicine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
The Evolution of Family Medicine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Family Medicine in the United States in 2020 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Family Medicine and General Practice Around the World . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Academic Principles of Family Medicine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Access . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Continuity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Comprehensiveness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Care Coordination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Contextual Care . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Current Challenges and Future Practice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
The Unsustainable Cost of Health Care . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Commercialization of Medicine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Sustaining Family Medicine as a Desirable Specialty Choice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
J. W. Saultz (*)
Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health and
Science University, Portland, OR, USA
e-mail: saultz@ohsu.edu
R. B. Taylor
Department of Family and Community Medicine, Eastern
Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA
Oregon Health Science University, Portland, OR, USA
e-mail: taylorr@ohsu.edu
P. M. Paulman
Department of Family Medicine, University of Nebraska
Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
e-mail: ppaulman@unmc.edu
In its early years, the specialty of family medicine was being challenged. Rapid population growth
had originated within the lifetimes of its practi- and accelerating medical specialization following
tioners. As family medicine celebrates its 50th World War II precipitated a decline in access to
anniversary, the founding generation has retired, primary health care at the community level in the
and today’s family physicians (FPs) are providing United States. Although a handful of general prac-
care in a very different world. Few are in solo tice residencies were established in the 1950s,
practice. Many are employed in integrated health generalist training was inadequate in both quality
systems. and most use electronic information sys- and capacity. In response, the American public
tems to document care and communicate with and farsighted health policy planners decried the
patients. Since its beginning in 1969, family med- fragmentation of American medicine and called
icine has become one of medicine’s largest and for the creation of a physician who specialized
most successful specialties. And yet many of its in primary health care. Three influential reports,
current members are unfamiliar with the inspiring all published in 1966, made the case for what
story of how the specialty began. For this reason, eventually became family medicine. These
this book begins with an overview of the reports have historically been referred to by the
specialty’s origin, evolution, and current status. names of their chairmen: the Folsom report, the
The goal of this chapter is not simply to preserve Millis report, and the Willard report.
a record of the past but also to explain how family The Folsom report was a report of a national
medicine came to be the way it is, to delineate commission on community health services and
lessons learned by its first two generations of was sponsored by the American Public Health
leaders, and to provide a context for building the Association and the National Health Council [1].
discipline’s future. This commission’s 4-year investigation produced
14 recommendations. The most pertinent to the
evolving specialty of family practice was a task
A Short History of the Specialty force report entitled The Changing Role of the
Personal Physician, which concluded that all
Family medicine in the United States evolved Americans should have “personal physicians” to
from general practice, which was the dominant ensure the integration and continuity of their
force in health care until the mid-twentieth medical services. The report emphasized the
century. The story of how this happened can be importance of preventive medicine, the use of
told in at least three ways, and each of these community resources, and the importance of
creation stories offers insight into the specialty’s caring for the patient in a continuity context.
traditions and values. The second report was from the Citizens’ Com-
mission on Graduate Medical Education, which
was sponsored by the American Medical Associa-
Family Medicine as a Social Movement tion [2]. This commission focused on graduate
medical education. Specifically, it suggested that
Family practice arose as a specialty during the “primary physicians” be trained to replace the
1960s – the time of the Vietnam War, the civil dwindling number of general practitioners. The
rights movement, and widespread social unrest – a Millis report specifically addressed the importance
time not unlike today when the wisdom of experts of comprehensive clinical skills, continuity of care,
1 Family Medicine: Fifty Years of Caring for America 5
coordination of services, and preventive services to Declining numbers threatened the ability of gen-
be provided by these new primary physicians. eral practitioners to obtain and retain hospital
The third report was from the Committee on privileges and undermined their prestige and
Education for Family Practice, which was spon- political influence within the profession. While
sored by the Council on Medical Education of the first creation story is fundamentally a story
the American Medical Association (AMA) and of social activism, there is also a side of the story
was charged to review AMA policy regarding that was about preserving a way of life for those
the future of general practice [3]. The Willard practicing in community.
report specifically called for a new kind of spe- Four early decisions helped shape the future of
cialist in family practice and even specified the the new specialty, and all were about enhancing
outline of a training program for “family physi- the quality and prestige of the field. A specialty
cians.” It also recommended the establishment certifying board – the American Board of Family
of a certifying board in family practice. Practice – was created in 1969. Three-year
Dr. Willard was the dean of medicine at the residency training programs were established in
University of Kentucky. At that time, the chair- contrast to the prior norm of a single year of
man of the department of medicine at that med- internship for general practitioners. Mandatory
ical school was Edmund Pellegrino. Because of recertification was pioneered by the ABFP, and
his experience with general practice residents in all US board-certified family physicians still must
the 1950s, Dr. Pellegrino chose to appoint two undergo periodic recertification. Most other spe-
general practitioners to the full-time faculty in cialties have since established similar require-
the department of medicine [4]. One of these ments. Finally, mandatory continuing medical
individuals – Nicholas J. Pisacano – was an education was required by both the American
idealistic and scholarly general practitioner who Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) and the
was already one of the most outspoken advo- American Board of Family Practice.
cates for certification in the field. When the The new specialty began with 15 residency
American Board of Family Practice ultimately training programs, most converted from the few
achieved recognition as a certified specialty existing general practice programs. Federal grant
board, it was Dr. Pisacano who became its programs supported new departments of family
founding executive director. medicine in medical schools, and clinical depart-
With the support of the American Academy ments of family practice were formed in commu-
of General Practice (AAGP) and US general nity hospitals across America. From 1969 until
practitioners, family practice became the 20th today, the family medicine movement has contin-
American medical specialty in 1969. The story ued to gain momentum, with solid gains in student
of these three influential reports provides the recruitment, more residents in training, increased
first of family medicine’s creation stories – a numbers of board-certified FPs in practice, and
story focused on needs identified by public family physicians in leadership positions in clini-
policy-makers during a time of social unrest cal medicine and academia.
and reform.
specialty name should change from family prac- also embraced the need for improvements in pop-
tice to family medicine and organizations like the ulation outcomes as measured by electronic health
American Board of Family Medicine changed data, with accountability lying with practice orga-
their names accordingly. The most important rec- nizations. In 2014, another specialty-wide strate-
ommendations of the FFM all related to a pro- gic planning effort was undertaken. This project,
posed new model of clinical care that eventually called Family Medicine for America’s Health,
came to be known as the patient-centered medical eventually recommended an expansion of the
home (PCMH) [9]. At its heart, the PCMH called PCMH model to fully integrate mental health
for an evolution from the one-on-one doctor and population health into the primary care
patient relationship to a notion of team-based system [10]. Today, practices throughout the
care in which family medicine practices were country are struggling to make these recommen-
asked to create and empower teams of providers dations a reality. But this enhanced PCMH model
to share responsibility for their patients. Systems adds even more costs to the primary care system,
were devised to certify practices as PCMHs and, and it remains to be seen if reimbursement reform
by the end of the decade, electronic information will support such systems in the long term.
and communication systems became require- Throughout its history, family medicine has
ments for PCMH designation. Although some of struggled to attract a sufficient number of new
the initial cost of these electronic health records family physicians even as more and more respon-
was supported by the federal government, their sibility has fallen to the primary care system.
ongoing cost led to practice expenses that could By 2020, the number of medical schools and the
not easily be borne by the revenues generated number of graduating medical students have
from primary care practice alone. This further grown substantially, but family medicine still
catalyzed consolidation of practices into larger struggles with the inescapable reality that there
and larger groups and, in many cases, to practice are not enough family physicians to care for the
networks owned and supported by hospital-based American people. So a gap widens between fam-
systems. ily medicine ideals and the pressing realities of
Following the great recession of 2008, cost family physicians’ day to day work.
containment efforts had again failed to limit In 1987 Pellegrino [11] commented: “The birth
continuing increases in health-care spending and of Family Practice two decades ago, and its devel-
large delivery systems managed to increase reve- opment as a genuine specialty within the bodies of
nues even as the overall economy lagged. But as both medical practice and academia is surely one
cost pressure increased on these systems, the need of the most remarkable stories in contemporary
for larger and more effective primary care systems medical history.” Now 50 years old, the specialty
became apparent. While large delivery systems remains one of the shining accomplishments of
supported growth in primary care, they generally twentieth-century medicine. Family medicine was
opposed increasing reimbursement for these ser- born in an era of social change to protect and
vices, preferring instead to move hospital and professionalize general practice and to reform
specialty profits into primary care investments. American medicine. The need for the discipline
Under such conditions, more and more family has never been more apparent than it is today.
physicians became employees of large health sys-
tems and medicine evolved from loosely linked
small businesses to influential and sometimes Family Medicine in the United States
monopolistic corporate entities. in 2020
As the decade of the 2010s ends, family med-
icine again stands at crossroads. On the one hand, In 2018, there were 985,000 licensed physicians
its values remain rooted in the one-on-one doctor- in the United States [12] of which 139,000
patient relationship with personal accountability were professionally active FPs [13]. There are
resting on the physician. But the discipline has 131,000 members of the AAFP [14] and 92,000
8 J. W. Saultz et al.
diplomates certified by the ABFM [15]. The spe- of National Colleges, Academies, and Academic
cialty had 679 accredited residency programs with Associations of General Practitioners/Family
13,924 residents in training during the 2019–2020 Physicians (WONCA). More commonly known
academic years making it the largest specialty as the World Organization of Family Doctors,
in terms of programs and the second largest in WONCA is comprised of 118 member organiza-
terms of resident enrollment [16]. Family medi- tions in 131 countries, with membership of about
cine is well-established in nearly all of the nation’s 500,000 family doctors worldwide [20]. WONCA
medical schools, and there are required courses advocates for family medicine internationally and
and established research programs throughout hosts regional meetings in seven regions around
the country. In 2015, 6738 faculty members in the world. Some countries have retained the title
134 academic departments of family medicine general practitioner while others have adopted the
published 3002 peer-reviewed scientific papers name family physician, but around the world, the
and federal research funding supported over half core principles of the discipline are pretty much
of this work [17]. the same. Much of WONCA’s international work
The specialty has been undeniably successful has referenced the Alma-Ata Declaration of 1978
as measured by these accomplishments. And yet which was adopted by the World Health Organi-
there are concerning trends. Most of what is zation and defines the international importance of
known about the clinical work of family physi- primary care. Alma-Ata stands as one of the most
cians is based on studies of ABFM diplomates, important statements of public health principle of
admittedly a subset of all family physicians. But the twentieth century, and this work has catalyzed
evidence from the ABFM suggests steep declines the development of family medicine in most of the
in the number of family physicians delivering countries in the world with special emphasis on
maternity care, caring for hospitalized patients, developing countries.
and caring for children, and these changes have The nature of day-by-day practice in family
begun to impact the availability of basic health medicine varies from country to country.
services, particularly in rural and under-served In some areas, such as the United States and
communities that are most likely to be served by Canada, family physicians often have an active
family physicians [18]. Burnout and career dissat- role in hospital care. In other settings, such as in
isfaction are major problems among physicians the United Kingdom and Latin America, family
overall, and studies estimate that over half of the medicine is chiefly office-based, often supple-
nation’s family physicians describe themselves as mented by home care. But family physician and
burned out. Although there has been rapid growth general practitioners around the globe deliver care
in the number of residency programs, family med- based on shared academic principles.
icine attracted only 12.6% of US allopathic and
osteopathic medical school seniors in 2018 [19].
Even more concerning, striking racial and geo- Academic Principles of Family
graphic disparities in health status have widened Medicine
even though more Americans than ever have
health insurance coverage. As proud as family The official definition of family medicine is:
physicians justifiably are, the true promise of Family medicine is the medical specialty which
family medicine remains unachieved in America. provides continuing, comprehensive health care
for the individual and family. It is a specialty in
breadth that integrates the biological, clinical and
behavioral sciences. The scope of family medicine
Family Medicine and General Practice encompasses all ages, both sexes, each organ
Around the World system and every disease entity. [21]
The international group uniting family medicine This definition focuses on family medicine as a
and general practice is the World Organization specialty of medicine and not on family medicine
1 Family Medicine: Fifty Years of Caring for America 9
as an academic discipline. From the specialty’s while other physician groups (general internal
early days, some authors have considered family medicine and general pediatrics) and other pro-
medicine to be the name of the academic discipline fessionals (nurse practitioners and physician
on which the specialty is based and have discrim- assistants) deliver primary care, the study of how
inated between an academic discipline and a med- primary care is optimized has largely become the
ical specialty. Now that the specialty name is also domain of scholars in family medicine. Impor-
family medicine, the distinction might be a moot tantly, the term “scholars of family medicine” is
point. Nevertheless, the specialty’s 50-year history not limited to family physicians. Departments of
has produced a body of scholarly work that is family medicine now contain faculty members
uncontestably unique and important, and this with backgrounds in over a dozen fields including
body of work represents an academically rigorous the social and behavioral sciences, health eco-
intellectual field. Although this chapter will not nomics, public health, statistics, nursing, and
attempt to list them all (in fear of offending by communications in addition to medicine.
omission), there are currently at least 20 English The scholarly development of family medicine
language family medicine journals worldwide as is exemplified by the work of Barbara Starfield,
well as hundreds of books and thousands of schol- a pediatrician and health services researcher who
arly publications in clinical and health policy spent her career studying the core elements of
journals [22]. So, while the earliest scholarship in primary care from a health policy perspective [25,
the field was focused on describing what family 26]. Starfield first demonstrated that primary care is
physicians do, the field has now broadened to the strongly associated with better health outcomes
study of how practice outcomes can be optimized. and lower health costs after examining data from
Although there continues to be considerable debate nations around the world. These same associations
about the precise definition and content of family were present when her team examined data com-
medicine as an area of study, family medicine as an paring American states and local communities.
academic field is best defined as the study of how Starfield then became interested in distilling pri-
best to deliver efficient and affordable primary care mary care to its core elements as a way of measur-
to populations and communities [23]. ing its effectiveness in improving population health
Primary care is a term derived from the public outcomes. Based on this work as well as the work
health literature and refers to first-contact health of many others, the academic principles central to
services delivered at the community level, in con- primary care’s positive impact on public health
trast to secondary care (care delivered by specialty constitute family medicine’s core academic princi-
consultants and in community hospitals) and ter- ples. These are access, continuity, comprehensive-
tiary care (care delivered in specialized academic ness, care coordination, and contextual care [23].
settings). The most uniformly accepted definition
of primary care was published after extensive
study by the National Academy of Sciences Access
Institute of Medicine in 1996:
Most of the care delivered by family physicians is
Primary care is the provision of integrated, first-contact care with patients who choose when
accessible health care services by clinicians who and how to access that care as opposed to being
are accountable for addressing a large majority of
referred by another clinician. Access to care
personal health care needs, developing a sustained
partnership with patients, and practicing in the encompasses the study of how patients make
context of family and community. [24] these choices. Family physicians need to under-
stand how barriers to access limit the patient’s
Nearly all family physicians provide primary care, ability to get the care he or she needs. Also impor-
but historically they have also provided services tant, however, is the study of why some patients
such as maternity and hospital care that would overuse health care and how to manage and mod-
be characterized as secondary care. Furthermore, ify access. Understanding access to care includes
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
Se soutavi seljässä delfiinein, sen lempeä lainehet laulaa,
ja kanssa Vellamon impyein, hän aikojen aalloilla kaulaa. Siis
viritä virtesi, nuori mies! Voi, pian se riittyvi rinnan lies, ja
vanhuus jo sauvoilla hoippuen saa. Suo kantelos kajahtaa!
Hiihtäjän virsiä
Hiihtäjän hyräily.
1898.
Laulu onnesta.
1898
Orvon laulu.
Jos voisin laulaa kuin lintu laulaa, tai lailla honkien huoju
vain kun metsän äänillä puhua voisin, kun purona pulppuisin,
käkenä soisin, niin näinpä, näinpä sois' laulu hiihtäjän ladulta
ain':
1899.
Iltatunnelma.
1898.
Hautalaulu.
1898.
Älä usko, mit' ihmiset sanovat, älä kysele heiltä mua, mut
kysy mun kuolleelta äidiltään, joka lienevi lähellä sua. Mua
ihmiset ei nähneet, ne näki mun varjoni vain, minä itse
kaukana kuljin ja kaukaa viestit sain. Herra, varjele järkeni
valo!
1898.
Kuoleman renkinä.
1898.
Rauhattoman rukous.
1898.
1899.
Mua pelottaa.
Sydämeni talvi.
Huurtehessa on honkapuut,
hyyteessä ikkunalaudat.
Ihmiset takkahan tuijottaa,
hiljaa hiiliä liikuttaa —
liikkuvi muistojen haudat.
1899.
Metsän kosija
(1898).
I.
Yksin hiihtäjä.
Tellervo.