Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Towards A General Theory of Jewish Education - Seymour Fox

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Towards a General Theory of Jewish Education

Seymour Fox (1973)

THESIS

All previous analyses of Jewish educational reform fail to deal with the fundamental and most
urgent problem: The lack of a defined purpose for Jewish education.

Serious philosophical deliberation about the purpose of Jewish education is needed as a prior
and necessary condition to be able to tackle questions about curriculum, personnel, structure,
and financing.

CRITIQUE

Lacking a guiding philosophy that would enable it to pick and choose among subjects
competing for the limited time available, the Jewish school finds itself virtually paralyzed.

1. Curricula and methods of teacher training bear little resemblance to what the
leadership of the given movement, school, or institution claims to be central in its conception
of education. Purposes of Jewish education generally regarded as essential but largely absent
from Jewish education include character development, the role of Halacha, and its
applicability in practical situations, the State of Israel, philosophy and theology, and the
Holocaust.

2. Means and techniques have largely been imported indiscriminately from general
education without attention to their applicability to Jewish education.

3. Current curricula are based on models of the cheder and the yeshiva, modified in
the light of reduced instruction time. Additionally, the contemporary school attempts to teach
subjects (such as prayer, "synagogue skills," and Jewish observances) that were formally
handled within the domain of the family or outside of the school environment (who are no
longer equipped for the task).

CHANGE PROCESS

We must arrive at some kind of a consensus as to the basic ideas for the curriculum of
the Jewish school (and even within this consensus, alternative and competing curricula will
be developed to attain the same goals). This deliberation will enable us to discover, invent,
and import means that are likely to lead to the goals we have agreed upon.

We will have to invest a good deal of money and energy in social-science research to
accompany our investigation of the goals and content of Jewish education. Almost no
information concerning the attitudes, reactions, and commitments of students in Jewish
schools is available to the educator, and we know even less about the parents and the family.
We do not know the answers to such questions as: What would happen if schools
"succeeded?" Would parents then engage in subtle sabotage?
The necessary discussion on the goals and curriculum of the Jewish school cannot be
undertaken by the present leadership of Jewish education. We will need the expertise of
scholars in the field of Judaica in a partnership with educators and social scientists.

CONCLUSION

Jewish education can have a significant impact on the future of Jewish life in the United
States only if it is prepared to establish, through serious deliberation, philosophies of
education to guide the creation of new programs and practices.

These programs must be based on a sound analysis of both the reality and potential of Jewish
life.

A new kind of personnel will have to be recruited, from the ranks of Jewish scholarship and
the social sciences, to assume positions of leadership in Jewish education. Their task will be
to develop ideas that will inspire talented Jewish students, in turn, to consider a career in
Jewish education.

These new sources of energy must inevitably infuse new ideas into the curriculum,
teacher training, and the structure of education itself.

To accomplish all this will require large allocations of funds – but funding agencies will be
able to base their decisions on competing visions of the future.

You might also like