PDF Lactic Acid Bacteria Bioengineering and Industrial Applications Wei Chen Ebook Full Chapter
PDF Lactic Acid Bacteria Bioengineering and Industrial Applications Wei Chen Ebook Full Chapter
PDF Lactic Acid Bacteria Bioengineering and Industrial Applications Wei Chen Ebook Full Chapter
https://textbookfull.com/product/lactic-acid-bacteria-methods-
and-protocols-makoto-kanauchi/
https://textbookfull.com/product/lactic-acid-bacteria-
microbiological-and-functional-aspects-fifth-edition-ouwehand/
https://textbookfull.com/product/lactic-acid-bacteria-a-
functional-approach-1st-edition-marcela-albuquerque-cavalcanti-
de-albuquerque-editor/
https://textbookfull.com/product/acetic-acid-bacteria-
fundamentals-and-food-applications-1st-edition-ilkin-yucel-
sengun/
Lactic Acid in the Food Industry 1st Edition Sara M.
Ameen
https://textbookfull.com/product/lactic-acid-in-the-food-
industry-1st-edition-sara-m-ameen/
https://textbookfull.com/product/industrial-revolution-4-0-tech-
giants-and-digitized-societies-tai-wei-lim/
https://textbookfull.com/product/studies-on-green-synthetic-
reactions-based-on-formic-acid-from-biomass-ming-chen-fu/
https://textbookfull.com/product/current-developments-in-
biotechnology-and-bioengineering-biological-treatment-of-
industrial-effluents-1st-edition-duu-jong-lee/
https://textbookfull.com/product/current-developments-in-
biotechnology-and-bioengineering-production-isolation-and-
purification-of-industrial-products-1st-edition-ashok-pandey/
Wei Chen Editor
Lactic Acid
Bacteria
Bioengineering and Industrial
Applications
Lactic Acid Bacteria
Wei Chen
Editor
The print edition is not for sale in The Mainland of China. Customers from The Mainland of
China please order the print book from: Science Press.
This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
The registered company address is: 152 Beach Road, #21-01/04 Gateway East, Singapore 189721,
Singapore
Contents
v
Chapter 1
Lactic Acid Bacteria and γ-Aminobutyric
Acid and Diacetyl
S. Wang (*)
Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China
e-mail: wangshunhe@jiangnan.edu.cn
P. Chen
Shaanxi Radio & TV University, Xi’an, China
H. Dang
Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an, China
Many studies in recent years have reported the physiological function of GABA,
including delaying senescence of nerve cells, lowering blood pressure, repairing the
skin, treating mental illnesses, and regulating cardiac arrhythmia and hormone
secretion (He Xipu et al. 2007). Scientists from all around the world studied the
synthesis technology and its related product. GABA could be produced by chemical
synthesis, plant enrichment, and microbiological fermentation. Sawai et al. (2001)
researched that the content of GABA in tea could be enhanced through a variable
anaerobic-aerobic process. Meanwhile, it also could be produced by controlling the
germination condition of brown rice and rice germ. Xia Jiang et al. reported that
Lactobacillus brevis CGMCCNO.1306 was isolated from unpasteurized raw milk
and the capacity of GABA was 76.36 g/L after the mutation breeding (Xia Jiang
2006; Xia Jiang et al. 2006).
The chemical formula is C4H9NO2 and molar mass is 103.120 g/mol. It appears as a
white microcrystalline powder, easily soluble in water, slightly soluble in ethanol,
and insoluble in cold ethanol, benzene, and ether. The dissociation constant of
pKCOOH and pKNH3 were 4.03 and 10.56, respectively. GABA has no optical
rotation, the melting point was 203~204°C. Its products of decomposition were pyr-
rolidone and water (Chen Lilong and Shi 2010). In most part, GABA exists in the
form of amidogen with positive charge or carboxyl with negative charge. The state
of GABA determined its molecular conformation. In the gaseous state, the molecu-
lar conformation is highly folded due to the electrostatic interaction of two charged
groups; in solid state, the molecular conformation is extended due to the intermo-
lecular interaction between the two groups. When in liquid state, molecular confor-
mations exist in both states. The various conformations of GABA are combined
with different receptor proteins, which play significant physiological functions.
ation reaction. Nomura et al. (1998) reported that the content of GABA was 383 mg/
kg in cheese, in which a strain of Lactococcus lactis 01–7 with high GABA was
isolated. Komatsuzaki et al. (2005) researched that a strain of Lactobacillus paraca-
sei NFRI7415 with high GABA was isolated from traditional fermented food and
the capacity of GABA was 302 mmol/L. Xu Jianjun et al. (2002) isolated a strain of
Lactococcus lactis with high GABA for the first time interiorly, and the amount of
GABA in the fermentation broth was 250 mg/100 ml, which was fermented in 25 L
tank for 72 h. It could be used in the development of yogurt or as an ingredient in
other foods. Cui Xiaojun et al. (2005) also reported the screening and fermentation
conditions of high GABA-producing Lactobacillus, and the capacity of GABA was
5.4 g/L in the fermentation broth. Xia Jiang et al. (2006) isolated a strain of
Lactococcus lactis hjxi-01, and the maximum accumulation concentration of GABA
was 7 g/L in the medium containing 5% L-sodium glutamate (Xia Jiang 2006). And
on this basis, the initial strain was mutagenized by ultraviolet rays and radiation.
Finally, a high-yield mutant hjxj-80,119 was obtained, which was passed on for 12
consecutive generations and had stable genetic characters. Compared with the origi-
nal strain hjxj-01, the average yield increased by 142.9%, and the average product
was 17 g/L. Using neural network and particle swarm optimization algorithm, the
researchers optimized the fermentation conditions of lactic acid bacteria in the
shake flask, and the accumulated amounts of GABA was 33.4 g/L. After the optimi-
zation of indirect fermentation conditions, the concentration of GABA reached
107.5 g/L. Siragusa et al. (2007) isolated 12 different species of lactic acid bacteria
with high GABA from 22 kinds of Italian cheese. Five species of Lactobacillus,
including Lactobacillus casei PF6, Lactobacillus bulgaricus PR1, Lactococcus lac-
tis PU1, Lactobacillus plantarum C48, and short lactic acid bacteria PM17, had
strong ability to synthesize GABA. And the result of PCR acquired the glutamate
decarboxylase gene. The homology was analyzed by amino acid analyzer with
85%~99%. Ji Linli et al. (2008) isolated nine strains of lactic acid bacteria with high
GABA from traditional fermented milk. The strains WH11–1 and M10–4-3 were
identified as Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis through their traditional morphologi-
cal, physiological, biochemical, and chemical characteristics and 16S rDNA gene
identification. Fan et al. (2012) isolated Lactobacillus brevis CGMCC1306 with
high glutamate decarboxylase active from fresh and unpasteurized milk and further
analyzed the glutamate decarboxylase, which provided a basis for an approach that
could use glutamate decarboxylase and high-density culture to produce GABA in
the future. Xian Qianlong (2013) isolated 14 strains of lactic acid bacteria produc-
ing GABA, and two strains, including QL-14 (0.39 g/L) and QL-20 (0.584 g/L), had
relatively high GABA content. Through morphological features, physiological and
biochemical experiment, and 16S rDNA gene identification, strains of QL-14 and
QL-20 were identified as Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus casei,
respectively.
4 S. Wang et al.
The current research about function of γ-aminobutyric acid mainly focus on the
treatment and improvement of the nervous system disease, high blood pressure,
liver function, and renal function, the impact on the physiology and reproduction,
and many other aspects.
Leventhal et al. (2003) researched that GABA could make the brain of aged macaque
in peak form, while as the growth of age, the brain GABA would reduce gradually.
Macaque visual function was similar with human, which would be deteriorated with
the increase of age. When brain in peak form, macaque could choose signal to
respond. Lack of GABA could lead to the degeneration of nerve cell in macaque,
and that would decline the ability of visual selection. Compared with younger
macaque, after injecting GABA and its agonist in an aging macaque, visual cortex
cells could be a greater degree to restore the ability of visual stimulus orientation
and directional selectivity, making the “senescence” cells show the characteristics
of being “young.”
Leventhal et al. (2003) studied the effects of electrophoretic application of
GABA by using multibarreled microelectrodes, and the agonist and antagonist of
GABA A-type receptor were used in individual V1 cells in old monkeys. Compared
with old monkeys, GABA A-type receptor antagonist played an important role in
neuronal responses in young monkeys, which indicated the degradation of GABA-
mediated inhibition with the increasing monkey age. On the other side, the treat-
ment of GABA resulted in improved visual function. The treated cells in area V1 of
old animals displayed the special characteristic of young cells.
High blood pressure is a common human disease and a major risk factor for coro-
nary heart disease, stroke, or other cardiac-cerebral vascular diseases. According to
statistics, cardiac-cerebral vascular diseases, which were caused by high blood pres-
sure, caused about more than 12 million deaths yearly. Takahashi et al. (1959) first
reported the effect of GABA on the cardiovascular system, which found that GABA
had the strongest effect on cardiovascular activity in the γ-amino acid group. Later,
they also confirmed that 10 mg/kg GABA could reduce blood pressure and cause
bradycardia in rabbit, dog, and cat experiments. But its effect could be prevented by
resecting sympathetic nerve or blocking ganglion. In addition, this effect didn’t
need the vagus nerve, aortic nerve, and sinus nerve. Therefore, GABA might regu-
late blood pressure and heart rate by interacting central nervous system. Antonaccio
and Taylor (1977) injected 3~1000 g/kg GABA into the encephalocoele of anesthe-
tized cats, which decreased the blood pressure and heart rate with a dose-effect
1 Lactic Acid Bacteria and γ-Aminobutyric Acid and Diacetyl 5
relationship. It confirmed that GABA adjusted blood pressure and heart rate by
central nervous system for the first time. Kazami et al. (2002) also reported that
compound flavor containing GABA could significantly reduce the blood pressure of
patients with mild hypertension, which reduced systolic blood pressure by 6 mmHg
and diastolic blood pressure by 4 mmHg. The blood pressure of the normal group
remained unchanged, and no adverse reactions were observed. Hayakawa et al.
(2004) reported that GABA-enriched skim milk fermented by lactic acid bacteria
was fed to normal rat with spontaneous hypertension. The result showed that the
GABA-enriched milk had significantly lowered the blood pressure. Further study
found that the fermented milk didn’t contain antihypertensive peptides and the func-
tional component for lowering the blood pressure was GABA, which was similar to
the antihypertensive active ingredient in Astragalus membranaceus and manyinflo-
rescenced sweetvetch root.
The main inhibitory neurotransmitter in the brain was γ-aminobutyric acid. And it
could participate in the secretion regulation of anterior pituitary hormone at the
level of the hypothalamus or pituitary, which indirectly affected the function of the
ovary, oviduct, male gonads, and accessory organs and was closely related to the
movement of sperm and the production of steroid hormones. Murashima and Kato
(1986) found that the capacity of GABA in the tubal mucosa of rats was ten times
higher than that in the brain, and the concentration of GABA decreased in a gradient
from the oviduct fimbria to the connection of uterine and oviduct. Meanwhile,
research also showed that GABA is present in the male gonads and accessory
organs. GABA receptor was found on the surface of sperm membrane, suggesting
that GABA was related to sperm function. Roldan et al. (1994) reported that GABA
could significantly induce acrosome reaction in capacitated spermatozoa of mice
and human and had significant dose-effect relationship. Progesterone had promot-
ing effect to the reaction. Bian Shuling et al. (2002) reported that GABA could
increase the sperm acrosin activity and significantly increased Na+−k+-ATPase and
superoxide dismutase activity in normal and positive antisperm antibody (AsAb)
men and found that GABA could increase the sperm acrosin activity and signifi-
cantly increased Na+/K+-ATPase and superoxide dismutase activity, so it has impor-
tant theoretical significance and broad application outlooks in reproductive
physiology.
GABA was the most important inhibitory neurotransmitter in the central nervous
system of mammal, shellfish and certain parasitic worms and mediated over 40% of
inhibitory nerve conduction. The abnormality of GABA induced various nervous
system diseases, including excitotoxic reaction, epilepsy, insomnia, etc. (Mombereau
6 S. Wang et al.
et al. 2004). Since Tower first proposed that the occurrence of epilepsy was related
to GABA in the brain in the early 1960s, a large number of studies had shown that
the content of GABA in the spinal fluid of patients with epilepsy was significantly
lower than that of normal people and the extent of the decline was related to the type
of seizure. Many research showed that the content of GABA in the spinal fluid of
epileptic patients was significantly lower than that of normal people, and the decline
level was related with the type of epilepsy (Song Wei et al. 2008). GABA was a
special biochemical drug to treat intractable epilepsy. Experimental epilepsy could
be induced by GABA inhibitors, such as allylglycine, GABA A-type receptor, and
receptor antagonists, while GABA receptor agonist had anticonvulsive and antiepi-
leptic effects (Usuki et al. 2007). Okada et al. (2000) used GABA rice germ food
orally and found that it had the role of sedation, promoting sleep and resistance to
anxiety, and the total improvement rate of woman menopause syndrome and early
mental disorders was 75% in the elderly.
1 mmHg = 133.322 Pa
the flavor of soybean fermentation food, and the glutamic acid and its sodium salt
could be used to synthesize GABA, which provided a new idea for future research
on increasing GABA content and enhancing the function of soybean fermentation
food (Geng Jingzhang 2012).
Diacetyl is the key aroma of many fermented dairy products and also produces
unpleasant odor in wine and lemon juice (Jordan and Cogan 1988). The microorgan-
ism used to produce diacetyl was mainly Lactobacillus which could use citric acid.
Metabolism of citric acid by lactic acid bacteria was shown in Fig. 1.1. As was well
1 Lactic Acid Bacteria and γ-Aminobutyric Acid and Diacetyl 9
known, the two features of lactose fermentation and lactic acid production were
important to lactic acid bacteria in dairy products. And screening the strain that
could use citric acid to produce diacetyl was an important industry characteristic in
production of dairy products (Ma Guihua 1989; Borts 1963; Rodríguez et al. 2012).
Lactic acid bacteria which were able to take advantage of citric acid to produce
acetoin could be used to produce diacetyl. Therefore, lactic acid bacteria that pro-
duced diacetyl included Leuconostoc dextranicum, Leuconostoc citreum,
Streptococcus lactis, and some Bacterium lacticum (Yang Jiebin et al. 1996).
Citric acid was one of the most important substrates in the generation of diacetyl
by Lactobacillus. Citric acid was transferred into the cell by enzymes and then lysed
into acetic acid and oxaloacetic acid by lyase. Oxaloacetic acid was decomposed
into CO2 and pyruvic acid, while the process of pyruvate to diacetyl had not been
clearly explained (Hemme and Foucaud-Scheunemann 2004; Mcsweeney and
Sousa 2000). It is currently believed to be in two ways: The first was proposed by
Speckman and Collins (1968). It illustrated that active acetaldehyde was synthe-
sized from pyruvate and pyrithiamine, then condensed with acetyl-CoA, and split
into diacetyl by diacetyl synthetase. However, so far there was no direct evidence of
diacetyl synthetase. The second was proposed by Deman. The active acetaldehyde
was condensed with other pyruvate to form α-acetolactic acid by its synthetase
(Monnet et al. 1994), and then α-acetolactic acid was oxidized to form diacetyl
(Cogan et al. 1981). When in hypoxia, the outcome was 3-hydroxy-2-butanone and
then reduced to 2,3-butanediol with no obvious smell. Both of 3-hydroxy-2-
butanone and diacetyl had fragrant smell. The process of oxidative decarboxylation
had been supported by the data of biochemistry, genetics, and nuclear magnetic
resonance (Marth and Steele 1998). Diacetyl could be reduced by reductase to acet-
10 S. Wang et al.
oin (Cogan et al. 1981; Seitz et al. 1963). The catalytic activity of the enzyme had
great difference between different species or strains and, to a certain extent, was
affected by pH. Alpha-acetolactic acid was converted to acetoin by its decarboxyl-
ase. O’Sullivan et al. (2001) had successfully separated and purified the α-acetolactic
acid decarboxylase in Leuconostoc, determined the amino acid sequence, and con-
firmed the existence of the oxidative decarboxylation.
The metabolic pathways of diacetyl by lactic acid bacteria were mainly citric acid
metabolic and glycolytic pathways. Many Lactobacillus, especially Lactococcus,
could use lactose and citric acid to produce pyruvate and synthesize diacetyl
(Fig. 1.2). During the production of diacetyl from lactose, the excessive pyruvate
was used to synthesize α-acetolactic acid by its synthetase, and then diacetyl was
generated by oxidative decarboxylation reaction under the acidic condition. Diacetyl
was very unstable and could be reduced by reductase to acetoin. In the metabolic
pathways of citric acid to diacetyl, pyruvate and α-acetolactic acid were the most
important intermediates. Citric acid was lysed into oxaloacetic acid by lyase and
synthesizes to α-acetolactic acid from oxaloacetic acid directly or produced to pyru-
vate by decarboxylic reaction. Moreover, pyruvate decarboxylation reaction gener-
ated active acetaldehyde, which could be used with pyruvate to synthesize
α-acetolactic acid by its synthetase. And then diacetyl was generated by oxidative
decarboxylation reaction. Alpha-acetolactic acid was converted to acetoin by its
decarboxylase. Because of the low content of citric acid in milk, in general, diacetyl
was generated by glycolytic pathway in the fermented milk (Aymes et al. 1999;
Hugenholtz 1993; Curic et al. 1999).
During the process of glucose metabolism in Lactococcus, pyruvate was dehy-
drogenized by lactic dehydrogenase, became lactic acid, and transformed to acetyl
CoA by pyruvate dehydrogenase and formate lyase. Furthermore, acetyl CoA
became ethanol and acetaldehyde. Pyruvate was synthesized to α-acetolactic acid
Under aerobic conditions, the inactivation of pyruvate formate lyase led to the conver-
sion of pyruvate into acetic acid and CO2 by pyruvate dehydrogenase. Finally, excess
pyruvate was able to produce α-acetolactic acid by its synthase, and the reaction had
other important implications, because α-acetolactic acid was the precursor of diacetyl.
These alternative pathways of pyruvate metabolism were greatly influenced by
environmental conditions, and mutant strains that could not produce lactic dehydro-
genase must use excess pyruvate to produce other terminal products. Under certain
conditions, excess pyruvate might be converted to other products in cells, especially
flavor substance, such as diacetyl. Diacetyl was usually produced from citric acid,
but if the right conditions were established or the cells were generally modified,
cells that did not ferment citric acid could use lactose to form diacetyl. For example,
the overexpression of NADH oxidase in Lactococcus resulted in the reduction of
lactic acid from pyruvate while forming the precursor α-acetolactic acid of diacetyl
(Felipe et al. 1998). Studies had also found that glycometabolism of Lactobacillus
could be manipulated by changes in the concentration of pyruvate, an intermediate
product of metabolic engineering.
The yield and stability of diacetyl were affected by many external factors in the
fermentation of Lactococcus, such as the type and proportion of carbon and nitro-
gen sources in the culture medium, growth temperature, pH, oxygen, and so on.
Studies have found that under aerobic conditions, the yield of diacetyl was much
higher than that under anaerobic conditions (Curic et al. 1999). Under aerobic con-
ditions, the supplementation of citric acid in the medium could increase the yield of
diacetyl. The reason might be that under aerobic conditions, oxygen acted as an
electron receptor to promote the production of diacetyl during the process of the
formation through decarboxylation of α-acetolactic acid. And the supplementation
of citric acid led to further accumulation of pyruvate, resulting in the increased pro-
duction of diacetyl (Levata-Jovanovic and Sandine 1996). Therefore, in the fermen-
tation industry, in order to prevent the reduction reaction of diacetyl to form acetoin,
making fermentation dairy products lose their required flavor, the method of adding
citric acid or sodium citrate was often used to strengthen the milk to guarantee the
synthesis of diacetyl with constant and high yield. When it had achieved the desired
acidity and flavor, the product would be immediately cooled to inhibit the activity
of diacetyl reductase and decrease its damage to the diacetyl. In addition, it should
prevent the contamination of psychrophilic bacteria with high diacetyl reductase
activity. Optimization of culture conditions could improve the diacetyl production
capacity of Lactococcus to some extent but at the same time might affect the
1 Lactic Acid Bacteria and γ-Aminobutyric Acid and Diacetyl 15
proportion of other nutrients in the fermentation products and might produce some
harmful substances (Yang and Wang 1996).
The yield of diacetyl in yogurt fermentation was closely related to the activity of
several key enzymes, including the citrate lyase, oxaloacetic decarboxylase, α-acetyl
synthase, NADH oxidase, α-acetolactate decarboxylase, diacetyl reductase, and so
on. These enzymes could be inactivated or overexpressed by using molecular biol-
ogy technology, which could increase the accumulation of the intermediate product
pyruvate, α-acetolactic acid, change the metabolic pathway of diacetyl, and increase
the yield of diacetyl. In order to change the metabolic pathway of α-acetolactic acid
to acetoin, some domestic and foreign scholars had focused on the screening and
construction of some strains with α-acetolactic acid decarboxylase deficiency.
Aymes et al. (1999) used random mutagenesis to screen the subspecies of
Lactococcus lactis butanedione with α-acetolactic acid decarboxylase deficiency,
and under anaerobic conditions, the yield of diacetyl was much higher than that
of the wild strain. In order to increase the yield of the diacetyl in streptococcus
thermophiles, Monnet and Corrieu (2007) used the method of directional mutation
to select the Streptococcus thermophilus with α-acetolactic acid decarboxylase defi-
ciency in the medium containing ketobutyric acid, leucine, isoleucine. Under the
microaerobic conditions, the yield of diacetyl in mutant strain was nearly 3 times
higher than that of the wild strain. On the basis of screening and construction of the
strain with α-acetolactic acid decarboxylase deficiency, some researchers overex-
pressed the key genes which regulated the production of diacetyl, and further
attempts were made to improve the yield of diacetyl by means of joint regulation.
Hugenholtz et al. (1993) found that the overexpression of nox gene regulating
NADH oxidase under aerobic conditions significantly increased the content of
diacetyl in the Lactococcus lactis with α-acetolactic acid decarboxylase deficiency.
At present, the gene regulation and metabolism of diacetyl in most studies focused
on the regulation of some key genes such as glycolysis, citric acid metabolic path-
way. With detailed studies, more new products should be produced that meet the
demands of consumers.
by interfering with the use of arginine by reacting with the arginine-binding protein
of gram-negative bacteria.
Diacetyl was considered to be one of the most important ingredients in the flavor
of dairy products, as well as an important flavor in butter, cream, cheese, and many
nondairy products that require milk flavor (Hugenholtz et al. 2000). Most
Lactobacillus such as Lactococcus lactis, Streptococcus lactis, and Streptococcus
thermophilus could produce diacetyl (Aymes et al. 1999). However, diacetyl was
the main factor affecting the maturation period of beer flavor in beer fermentation.
When the content exceeded the threshold (0.15 × 10–6), it would produce an
unpleasant sour beer taste (Bartowsky and Henschke 2004).
References
Felipe FLD, Kleerebezem M, Vos WMD et al (1998) Cofactor engineering: a novel approach
to metabolic engineering in Lactococcus lactis by controlled expression of NADH oxidase.
J Bacteriol 180:3804–3808
Cui Xiaojun, Jiang Bo, Feng Biao (2005) Optimization of fermentation conditions for GABA
(γ-aminobutyric acid) production by lactobacillus SK005. Food Res Dev 26:64–69
Garrigues C, Loubiere P, Lindley ND et al (1997) Control of the shift from homolactic acid to
mixed-acid fermentation in Lactococcus lactis: predominant role of the NADH/NAD+ ratio.
J Bacteriol 179:5282
Gasson MJ, Benson K, Swindell S et al (1996) Metabolic engineering of the Lactococcus lactis
diacetyl pathway. Dairy Sci Technol 76:33–40
Geng Jingzhang (2012) Research on use of gamma-amino butyric acid (GABA) in food industry.
Beverage Ind 15:11–14
Godon JJ, Delorme C, Bardowski J et al (1993) Gene inactivation in Lactococcus lactis: branched-
chain amino acid biosynthesis. J Bacteriol 175:4383–4390
Goupil N, Corthier G, Ehrlich SD et al (1996) Imbalance of leucine flux in Lactococcus lac-
tis and its use for the isolation of diacetyl-overproducing strains. Appl Environ Microbiol
62:2636–2640
Guo Zheng (1998) Research of Butanedione synthesis technology. Zhejiang Chem Ind 2:22–23
Han Guangdian (1978) Handbook of organic preparation chemistry. Chemical Industry Press, Bei
Jing
Hayakawa K, Kimura M, Kasaha K et al (2004) Effect of a gamma-aminobutyric acid-enriched
dairy product on the blood pressure of spontaneously hypertensive and normotensive Wistar-
Kyoto rats. Br J Nutr 92:411–417
He Xipu, Zhang Min, Li Junfang et al (2007) The physiological function of γ -aminobutyric acid
and the general research about γ -aminobutyric acid. J Guangxi Univ Nat Sci Ed 32:464–466
Hemme D, Foucaud-Scheunemann C (2004) Leuconostoc, characteristics, use in dairy technology
and prospects in functional foods. Int Dairy J 14:467–494
Hua Chaoli, Zhao Zheng (2004) Studies on a nes ketone flavor yogurt co-fermented by Lactobacillus
helveticus and Streptococcus diacetylactis. Zhonggue Rupin Gongye 32:17–20
Huang YH, Zheng HF, Liu XL, Wang X et al (2005) Studies of the variation of GABA and Glu in
Gabaron tea process. Food Sci 26:117–120
Hugenholtz J (1993) Citrate metabolism in lactic acid bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev 12:165–178
Hugenholtz J, Kleerebezem M, Starrenburg M et al (2000) Lactococcus lactis as a cell factory for
high-level diacetyl production. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:4112–4114
Jay JM, Loessner MJ, Golden DA (1992) Modern food microbiology. Chapman & Hall, New York
Ji Linli (2008) The screening and identification of LAB strains isolated from traditional dairy
products with γ-amino butyric acid producing and optimizing their fermentation conditions.
Inner Mongolia agricultural university, Hu He Hao Te
Jordan KN, Cogan TM (1988) Production of acetolactate by Streptococcus diacetylactis and
Leuconostoc spp. J Dairy Res 55:227–238
Kazami D, Ogura N, Fukuchi T et al (2002) Antihypertensive effect of Japanese taste season-
ing containing γ-amino butyric acid on mildly hypertensive and high-normal blood pressure.
Nippon Shokuhin Kagaku Kogaku Kaishi 49:409–415
Komatsuzaki N, Shima J, Kawamoto S et al (2005) Production of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) by
Lactobacillus paracasei isolated from traditional fermented foods. Food Microbiol 22:497–504
Krajnc D, Neff N, Hadjiconstantinou M (1996) Glutamate, glutamine and glutamine synthetase in
the neonatal rat brain following hypoxia. Brain Res 707:134–137
Krnjević K, Schwartz S (1966) Is gamma-aminobutyric acid an inhibitory transmitter? Nature
211:1372–1374
Levata-Jovanovic M, Sandine WE (1996) Citrate utilization and diacetyl production by various
strains of Leuconostoc mesenteroides ssp. Cremoris 1. J Dairy Sci 79:1928–1935
Leventhal AG, Wang Y, Pu M et al (2003) GABA and its agonists improved visual cortical function
in senescent monkeys. Science 300:812–815
18 S. Wang et al.
Liu Fang, Wang Yutang, Huo Guicheng (2006) Screening and identification of S. Thermophiles
producing diacetyl. J Dairy Sci Technol 29:272–275
Ma Guihua (1989) Lactobacillus and human health. Food Herald:10–12
Marth EH, Steele JL (1998) Applied dairy microbiology. Marcel Dekker, New York
Marugg JD, Goelling D, Stahl U et al (1994) Identification and characterization of the alpha-
acetolactate synthase gene from Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis biovar. Diacetylactis. Appl
Environ Microbiol 60:1390–1394
Mcsweeney PLH, Sousa MJ (2000) Biochemical pathways for the production of flavour com-
pounds in cheeses during ripening: a review. Lait 80:293–324
Meng Xiangchen (2009) Lactic acid Bacteria and dairy starter culture. Science Press, Bei Jing
Mombereau C, Kaupmann K, Froestl W et al (2004) Genetic and pharmacological evidence of a
role for GABA (B) receptors in the modulation of anxiety-and antidepressant-like behavior.
Neuropsychopharmacology 29:1050–1062
Monnet C, Corrieu G (2007) Selection and properties of alpha-acetolactate decarboxylase-deficient
spontaneous mutants of Streptococcus thermophilus. Food Microbiol 24:601–606
Monnet C, Schmilt P, Divies C (1994) Diacetyl production in milk by an α-acetolactic acid accu-
mulating strain of Lactococcus lactis ssp. lactis biovar. Diacetylactis. J Dairy Sci 77:2916–2924
Monnet C, Schmitt P, Divies C (1997) Development and use of a screening procedure for produc-
tion of alpha-acetolactate by Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis biovar. Diacetylactis strains. Appl
Environ Microbiol 63:793–795
Murashima YL, Kato T (1986) Distribution of gamma-aminobutyric acid and glutamate decarbox-
ylase in the layers of rat oviduct. J Neurochem 46:166–172
Nomura M, Kimoto H, Someya Y et al (1998) Production of gamma-aminobutyric acid by cheese
starters during cheese ripening. J Dairy Sci 81:1486–1491
O’Sullivan SM, Condon S, Cogan TM et al (2001) Purification and characterisation of acetolactate
decarboxylase from Leuconostoc lactis NCW1. FEMS Microbiol Lett 194:245–249
Okada T, Sugishita T, Murakami T et al (2000) Effect of the defatted rice germ enriched with
GABA for sleeplessness, depression, autonomic disorder by oral administration. J Jpn Soc
Food Sci Technol Nippon Shokuhin Kagaku Kogaku Kaishi 47:596–560
Roberts E, Frankel S (1950) Gamma-aminobutyric acid in brain: its formation from glutamic acid.
J Biol Chem 187:55–63
Rodríguez A, Martínez B, Suárez J (2012) Dairy starter cultures. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Roldan ER, Murase T, Shi QX (1994) Exocytosis in spermatozoa in response to progesterone and
zona pellucida. Science 266:1578–1581
Sawai Y, Yamaguchi Y, Miyama D et al (2001) Cycling treatment of anaerobic and aerobic incuba-
tion increases the content of gamma-aminobutyric acid in tea shoots. Amino Acids 20:331–334
Seitz EW, Sandine WE, Elliker PR et al (1963) Distribution of diacetyl reductase among bacteria.
J Dairy Sci 46:186–189
Siragusa S, Angelis MD, Cagno RD et al (2007) Synthesis of gamma-aminobutyric acid by lactic
acid bacteria isolated from a variety of Italian cheeses. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:7283–7290
Snoep JL, Mj TDM, Starrenburg MJ et al (1992) Isolation, characterization, and physiological role
of the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex and alpha-acetolactate synthase of Lactococcus lactis
subsp. lactis biovar. Diacetylactis. J Bacteriol 174:4838–4841
Song Huanlu (2002) The primary study on Diacetyl biosynthesis by lactic acid Bacteria. Food
Ferment Ind 28:47–50
Song Wei, Ma Xia, Zhang Bailin (2008) Physiological benefits and fortifications of γ-Aminobutyric
Acid in dairy products. J Dairy Sci Technol 31:297–302
Speckman RA, Collins EB (1968) Separation of diacetyl, acetoin, and 2, 3-butylene glycol by
salting-out chromatography. Anal Biochem 22:154–160
Takahashi H, Tiba M, Yamazaki T et al (1959) On the site of action of gamma-aminobutyric acid
on blood pressure. Jpn J Physiol 8:378–390
Udenfriend S (1950) Identification of gamma-aminobutyric acid in brain by the isotope derivative
method. J Biol Chem 187:65–69
1 Lactic Acid Bacteria and γ-Aminobutyric Acid and Diacetyl 19
Usuki S, Ito Y, Morikawa K et al (2007) Effect of pre-germinated brown rice intake on diabetic
neuropathy in streptozotocin- induced diabetic rats. Nutr Metab 4:25
Wang Zhen (1992) Dictionary of chemical technology. Chemical Industry Press, Bei Jing
Xia Jiang (2006) Breeding of γ-aminobutyric acid-producing lactobacillus and optimization of
fermentation conditions. Zhejiang University, Hang Zhou
Xia Jiang, Mei Lehe, Huang Jun et al (2006) Screening and mutagenesis of Lactobacillus brevis
for biosynthesis of γ-aminobutyric acid. J Nucl Agric Sci 20:379–382
Xian Qianlong (2013) Selection of γ-aminobutyric acid-producing lactic acid Bacteria and the
development of functional yoghurt. Guangxi University of Technology, Liu Zhou
Xie Haiyan, Yin Dulin (2000) Catalytic oxidation of Butan-2-one to Diacetyl. Hunan Chem Ind
30:22–23
Xu Jianjun, Jiang Bo, Xu Shiying (2002) Screening of lactic acid Bacteria for biosynthesis of
γ-amino butyric acid. Food Sci Technol:7–8
Yang Jiebin, Guo Xinghua, Zhang Chi et al (1996) Lactic acid Bacteria: biological basis and appli-
cation. China Light Industry Press, Bei Jing
Yang Lijie, Wang Junhu (2004) Genetic manipulation of the pathway for diacetyl metabolism in
Lactococcus lactis. Zhonggue Rupin Gongye 32:24–29
Yang LJ, Wang JH (1996) Genetic manipulation of the pathway for diacetyl metabolism in
Lactococcus lactis. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:2641–2643
Yu Peng, Zhang Lanwei, Xu Qian et al (2006) Screening mutagenized Lactococcus Lactis subsp.
lactis Biovar Diacetyl strains overproducing Diacetyl. J Dairy Sci Technol 29:218–220
Zheng Yingfu, Han Zhenrong, Zhao Chunhai (2005) A review on improving diacetyl formation in
Lactococcus lactis. China Biotechnol 25:186–189
Chapter 2
Lactic Acid Bacteria and Conjugated Fatty
Acids
2.1 Introduction
Conjugated fatty acid (CFA) refers to a group of positional and geometric isomers
of polyunsaturated fatty acid possessing conjugated double bonds. Conjugated dou-
ble bonds, conjugated triple bonds, and conjugated quadruple bonds are the typical
conjugated fatty acid forms, in which conjugated octadecadienoic acid and conju-
gated octadecatrienoic acid are most common isomers, such as conjugated linoleic
acid (CLA), conjugated linolenic acid (CLNA), and conjugated steariconic acid
CSA (Yang et al. 2015).
Conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) is a generic term of octadecadienoic acid with con-
jugated double bonds, referring to a group positional and geometric isomer of lin-
oleic acid (LA), in which each conjugated double bond exists in two types, cis (c)
and trans (t). In theory, according to the position of double bonds, 54 isomers of
CLA could be synthesized; however, until now, only 28 isomers have been identi-
fied, including conjugated double bond on C7,C9, C8,C10, C9, C11, C10,C12, C11, and
C13. c9, t11-CLA (rumenic acid) was the most abundant CLA isomer, followed by
t10,c12-CLA (Andrade et al. 2012).
CLA has attracted much attention due to its physiological effects, such as anti-
inflammation, anticancer, reduction of atherosclerosis, anti-obesity, amelioration of
diabetes, promotion of bone growth, and immune regulation. As reported, the bio-
logical function was isomer-dependent, in which c9,t11-CLA and t10,c12-CLA
were recognized as the CLA isomers with best physiological effects (Fig. 2.1). The
major physiological functions of c9,t11-CLA were anti-cancer, anti-inflammation,
and immune regulation, whereas t10,c12-CLA has significant benefits on anti-
obesity and regulation of lipid metabolism. Additionally, t9,t11-CLA was reported
with anti-inflammation function (Yang et al. 2015).
CLA naturally occurs in ruminant milk and issues; therefore, ruminant dairy and
meat products are the main source of CLA in the daily diet, in which c9, t11-CLA
comprised of 80–90% fatty acid of the total dairy lipids and t10,c12-CLA comprised
of only 1% of total dairy lipids. Moreover, other CLA isomers, such as t7,c9-CLA,
c8,t10-CLA, t10,c12-CLA, and t11,c13-CLA, could be detected in the milk (Jensen
2002). In ruminant animals, two major sources of CLA were reported: (1) CLA was
mainly produced as one of the intermediates by some ruminant bacteria in the pro-
cess of catalyzing LA into stearic acid (C18:0), and (2) numerous researches have
reported that c9,t11-CLA could be generated by Δ9-dehydrogenase in the mammary
gland with vaccenic acid (t11-C18:1) as substrate. Many studies on the CLA-
producing mechanism in ruminant bacteria have been carried out (Kepler et al. 1966,
1971; Kepler and Tove 1967; Polan et al. 1964; Rosenfeld and Tove 1971) that LA
could be quickly transformed into CLA by linoleic acid isomerase in ruminant bac-
teria and then transferred into vaccenic acid at a slower rate. After vaccenic acid was
accumulated to a certain level, it would be further transformed to stearic acid. Other
studies have demonstrated that some vaccenic acid in ruminant animals could be
absorbed and then transported to other tissues. Vaccenic acid in the mammary bland
could be further transferred into CLA through catalyzing by Δ9-dehydrogenase
(Bauman et al. 2001). It has been identified that CLA generated from this process
could comprise of 60–70% of total CLA in the milk (Corl et al. 2001).
2 Lactic Acid Bacteria and Conjugated Fatty Acids 23
Conjugated linolenic acid (CLNA) was one of the derivates from linolenic acid
(LNA, C18:3) with conjugated double bonds, comprising of different isomers
(Fig. 2.2). CLNA was firstly discovered in the nineteenth century; however, it was
not attracted much attention due to rare awareness of its physiological effects. Till
1987, Nuteren and Christ-Hazelhof firstly identified the biological activity of CLNA
when they studied the inhibitory effect of fatty acids derived from plant seeds on the
synthesis of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) (Nugteren and Christ 1987). Later, anti-
cancer and anti-obesity activities of naturally CLNA from bifidobacteria were
reported by other researchers (Coakley et al. 2009; Hennessy et al. 2012; Destaillats
et al. 2005.) The bifidobacterial CLNA isomers analyzed included c9,t11,c15-
CLNA, t9,t11,c15-CLNA, c9,t11,c13-CLNA, c9,t11,t13-CLNA, c6,c9,t11-CLNA,
and c6,t9,t11-CLNA.
CLNA was widely distributed in nature, such as milk and ruminant meet. In
addition, CLNA occurs in some plant seeds, for instance, pomegranate seeds, tung
oil seeds, momordica charantia seeds, calendula seeds, etc. The CLNA isomers
derived from plant seeds consist of many kinds of isomers, and thus proper
Fig. 2.2 Structure of α-linolenic acid, γ- linolenic acid, and conjugated linolenic acids
24 W. Chen et al.
separation methods would be key factors to obtain the pure isomers (Smith Jr.
1971). Recently, supercritical CO2 fluid extraction and low-temperature-crystalliza-
tion methods have been applied to separate CLNA. However, recent separation
methods could not address the commercial requirements due to the limited amount
of food grade plants.
Despite CLA and CLNA, another conjugated fatty acid is conjugated stearidonic
acid (CSA). CSA has been identified to possess many physiological activities, such
as anti-tumor, antiatherosclerosis, and hypoglycemic activity. Besides, CSA could
be applied in lipid peroxidation to evaluate the antioxidant agents. The identified
isomers of CSA include c6,c9,t11,c15-CSA, c6,t9,t11,c15-CSA, c9,t11,t13,c15-
CSA, and t9,t11,t13,c15-CSA (Fig. 2.3) (Hennessy et al. 2012).
Microbial CFA producers have been studied for decades, which started in 1960s.
Kepler et al. (1966, 1970, 1971), Kepler and Tove (1967) originally found that
Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens, one of the ruminant bacteria, could convert LA to
CLA. Then a variety of microbes showed the property of CLA production, espe-
cially that lactic acid bacteria could generate c9,t11-CLA and t9,t11-CLA. With the
increase of research of CLA production in lactic acid bacteria, CLNA, CSA, and
2 Lactic Acid Bacteria and Conjugated Fatty Acids 25
other CFA were found in lactic acid bacteria metabolites. Lactic acid bacteria with
CFA production ability include Lactobacillus (L. plantarum, L. acidophilus, L.
casei, L. reuteri, L. fermentum, L. bulgaricus, L. rhamnosus), Bifidobacterium (B.
breve, B. longum, B. animalis subsp. lactis), Lactococcus lactis, Streptococcus ther-
mophiles, etc.
Lactobacillus was widely reported with CFA production ability, especially CLA
production, which consisted of almost each species of lactobacilli (Table 2.1).
L. plantarum was the most widely studied strain among lactobacilli with CLA-
production ability. In 2002, Kishino et al. screened many lactic acid bacteria strains
with CLA-production ability, including Lactobacillus, Enterococcus, Pediococcus,
and Propionibacterium (Kishino et al. 2002), in which L. plantarum AKU1009a
was the strain with the best CLA-generation ability. Further study demonstrated that
L. plantarum AKU1009a could even transform ricinoleic acid into CLA directly.
Interestingly, the washed cells of this strain could catalyze α-linolenic acid into
c9,t11,c15-CLNA and t9,t11,c15-CLNA with a 40% of total conversion rate.
Comparatively, it has a better ability of CLNA from γ-linolenic acid with a conver-
sion rate up to 68%. CSA could be produced from stearidonic acid into c6,c9,t11,c15-
CSA and c6,t9,t11,c15-CSA by the strain (Kishino et al. 2010). The concentration
of ricinoleic acid utilized by the washed cells of L. plantarum JCM1551 was up to
2400 mg/L with c9,t11-CLA and t9,t11-CLA as the main isomers (Andrade et al.
2012). L. plantarum NCUL005 has also been reported to produce CLA with final
concentration of 623 mg/L growing in MRS medium in the presence of free LA
(Andrade et al. 2012). Furthermore, growing and washed cells of L. plantarum
ZS2058 could both transform free LA into CLA with conversion rate as 54.3% and
46.75%, respectively (Yang et al. 2017).
Except growing cells in the MRS medium or washed cells in the proper reaction
solution, the strains added into the fermentis medium including sunflower oils or
soymilk could also be used as the CLA producers (Li et al. 2012). VSL3# was the
most widely used probiotics including eight strains, and studies have reported that
all the eight strains could produce CLA, in which the conversion rate of L. planta-
rum strain was about 60% with c9, t11-CLA and t9,t11-CLA as the main isomers
(Ewaschuk et al. 2006).
Furthermore, the CLA production mechanism by lactobacilli was also identified.
Shimizu et al. firstly found that LA was firstly transformed into 10-hydroxy-cis-12
octadecenic acid and 10-hydroxy-trans-12-octadecenic acid, and then these two
intermediates were both transferred into CLA (Ogawa et al. 2001). Further analysis
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
. . . . .
The following thoughtful description of the action appeared in the German
wireless communiqué next morning:
“Our light forces in an enterprise off the English coast put to flight a vastly
superior strength of armed merchant cruisers escorted by destroyers. English fleet
on coming to the rescue was compelled to withdraw, and our forces returned to
harbour without further molestation.”
Every man to his own trade.
THE NAVY-THAT-FLIES[A]
The Royal Naval Air Service found itself “over the other side” about the time that
the shells of the British monitors began feeling for the hidden batteries of the
Boche behind the Belgian coast.
“I can’t see where they’re pitching,” said the Navy-that-Floats, referring to the
shells of the monitors bursting twelve miles away. “What about spotting for us, old
son?”
“That will I do,” replied the Navy-that-Flies. “And more also. But I shall have
to wear khaki, because it’s done, out here; by everybody apparently. Even the
newspaper reporters wear khaki. Also I must have the right machines and lots of
’em.”
“Wear anything you like,” replied the Navy-that-Floats, “as long as you can
help us to hit these shore batteries. Only—because you wear khaki and see life,
don’t forget you’re still the same old Navy as it was in the beginning, is now, and
ever shall be.”
The Navy-that-Flies added “Amen,” and said that it wouldn’t forget. It garbed
itself in khaki, but retained the ring and curl on the sleeve, and the naval cap (with
the eagle’s wings in place of the crown and anchor in the badge), plus a khaki cap-
cover. Wherever its squadrons were based they rigged a flagstaff and flew the
White Ensign at the peak. They erected wooden huts and painted them service
grey, labelling them “Mess-deck,” “Wardroom,” “Gunroom,” etc., as the case
might be.
They divided the flights into port and starboard watches, and solemnly asked
leave to “go ashore” for recreation. Those who strayed from the same stern paths of
discipline suffered the same punishments as the Navy-that-Floats. And at the
conclusion of each day’s work the wardroom dined, and drank to their King,
sitting, according to the custom and tradition of the naval service.
They filled in shell-holes and levelled the ground for aerodromes, they ran up
hangars and excavated dug-outs—whither they retired in a strong, silent rush (the
expression is theirs), when the apprehensive Boche attempted to curtail their
activity with bombs.
And by degrees the right machines came along. The Navy-that-Flies swung
itself into them critically, flung them about in the air three miles high, testing and
measuring their capabilities. Then they fought them, crashed them, improved on
them till they were righter still, and finally proceeded (to quote another of their
expressions) to “put the wind up Old Man Boche” in a way that helped the Navy-
that-Floats enormously.
But apart from spotting duties, which were necessarily intermittent, the
R.N.A.S. undertook a photographic reconnaissance of the entire Belgian coast from
Nieuport to the Dutch frontier. The work in progress at Ostend and Zeebrugge, the
activities of submarines and destroyers inside the basins; locks, quays, and gun-
emplacements, and the results of bombs dropped thereon the night before, were all
faithfully recorded by these aerial cameras. The negatives were developed and
printed, the resultant bird-pictures enlarged, studied through stereoscopic lenses,
and finally given to the monitors “for information and guidance.” Since it is not
given to everyone to recognise the entrance to a dug-out or a group of searchlights
as they appear from a height of 20,000 feet, the photographs were embellished with
explanatory notes for the benefit of anyone unaccustomed to such unfamiliar
aspects of creation.
The Germans claim to be a modest people. They were as busy as beavers, and
they resented these importunate photographers with all the fervour that springs
from true modesty. Their anti-aircraft guns plastered the intruders with bursting
shrapnel, and from every coast aerodrome Boche machines rose like a cloud of
angry hornets to give battle. Yet day after day fresh plates find their way to the
developing trays, and a comparison between the official reports of the flight—
couched in a laconic terseness of phrase that is good to read—and the amazing
results obtained gives perhaps the truest measure of the work performed by these
very gallant gentlemen.
Not a spadeful of earth can be turned over, nor a trowel of cement added to a
bastion along the coast, but a note appears a day or two later upon the long chart
which adorns the record office of this particular squadron. A crumpled escorting
machine may have come down out of the clouds, eddying like a withered leaf, to
crash somewhere behind the German line; there may be somewhere near the shore
a broken boy in goggles and leather lying amid the wreckage of his last flight. Such
is the price paid for a few more dots added in red ink to a couple of feet of chart.
But as long as the photographic machine returns with the camera intact, the price is
paid ungrudgingly.
The work of these photographic recorders, pilot and observer alike, differs from
all other forms of war flying. Their sole duty is to take photographs, not haphazard,
but of a given objective. This necessitates steering a perfectly steady course
regardless of all distractions such as bursting “Archies” and angry “Albatross”
fighters. They leave the fighting to their escorts, and their fate to Providence. The
observer, peering earthwards through his view-finder, steers the pilot by means of
reins until he sights the line on which the desired series of photographs are to be
taken: once over this, the pilot flies the machine on an undeviating course, and the
observer proceeds to take photographs. When all the plates have been exposed,
they turn round and return home with what remain of the escort. On occasions the
escort have vanished, either earthwards or in savage pursuit of resentful though
faint-hearted Boches; this is when the homing photographers’ moments are apt to
become crowded with incident.
One such adventure deserves to be recorded. It happened about 12,000 feet
above mother-earth: the official reports, typed in triplicate, covered some dozen
lines; the actual events, an equal number of minutes; but the story is one that
should live through eternity.
“While exposing six plates” (says the official report of this youthful Recording
Angel) “observed five H.A.’s cruising.” (“H.A.” stands for Hostile Aeroplane.)
“Not having seen escort since turning inland, pilot prepared to return. Enemy
separated, one taking up position above tail and one ahead. The other three glided
towards us on port side” (observe the Navy speaking), “firing as they came.
“The two diving machines fired over one hundred rounds, hitting pilot in
shoulder.” As a matter of sober fact, the bullet entered his shoulder from above and
behind, breaking his left collar bone, and emerged just above his heart, tearing a
jagged rent down his breast. Both his feet, furthermore, pierced by bullets, but the
observer was not concerned with petty detail.
“Observer held fire until H.A. diving on tail was within five yards.”
Here it might be mentioned that the machines were hurtling through space at a
speed in the region of one hundred miles an hour. The pilot of the “H.A.,” having
swooped to within speaking distance, pushed up his goggles and laughed
triumphantly as he took his sight for the shot that was to end the fight. But the
observer had his own idea of how the fight should end.
“Then shot one tray into pilot’s face,” he says, with curt relish, and watched him
stall, sideslip, and go spinning earthward in a trail of smoke.
He turned his attention to his own pilot. The British machine was barely under
control, but as the observer rose in his seat to investigate, the foremost gun fired,
and the aggressor ahead went out of control and dived nose-first in helpless spirals.
Suspecting that his mate was badly wounded in spite of this achievement, the
observer swung one leg over the side of the fuselage and climbed on to the wing—
figure for a minute the air pressure on his body during this gymnastic feat—until
he was beside the pilot. Faint and drenched with blood, the latter had nevertheless
got his machine back into complete control.
“Get back, you ass,” he said, through white lips, in response to inquiries as to
how he felt. The ass got back the way he came, and looked round for the remainder
of the “H.A.’s.” These, however, appeared to have lost stomach for further fighting,
and fled. The riddled machine returned home at one hundred knots, while the
observer, having nothing better to do, continued to take photographs. “The pilot,
though wounded, made a perfect landing.” Thus the report concludes.
The Navy-that-Flies had been in France some time before the Army heard very
much about its doings. This was not so much the fault of the Army as the outcome
of the taciturn silence in which the Navy-that-Flies set to work. It had been bidden
to observe the traditions of the silent Navy, and it observed them, forbearing even
to publish the number of Boche machines it accounted for day by day.
But there came a time when its light could no longer be hid under a bushel.
“Hullo,” said the generals and others concerned with the affairs of the entrenched
Army, speaking among themselves, “what about it?” They consulted the Army-
that-Flies.
Now the Army-that-Flies had been confronted in the early days of the war with
perhaps the toughest proposition that was ever faced by mortals of even their
imperturbable courage. In numerical inferiority to the enemy it had been called
upon to maintain a ceaseless photographic reconnaissance far behind the enemy’s
trenches; to spot for the guns of the Army along a suddenly extended front: to
“keep the wind up” the Boche so that for every ten of our machines that crossed the
German lines, barely one of his would dare to cross ours. This is called aerial
supremacy, and they established and maintained it with fewer and worse machines
than they care to talk about to-day.
“Of course we know all about these naval Johnnies,” said the Army-that-Flies.
“They’d steal grey paint from their dying grandmothers, and they fear nothing in
the heavens above, nor the earth beneath, nor in the waters under the earth. They
are complaining that things are getting a bit dull along the coast.... We might show
them a thing or two if they cared to join up with us for a while.”
“Let’s ask them,” said the Army.
So the Navy-that-Flies was invited “to co-operate with the Royal Flying Corps
on such portions of the line where its experience of escort work and offensive
patrols would prove of the greatest value.” Or words to that effect.
The Navy-that-Flies accepted the invitation with suppressed exultation, and
detailed certain squadrons of fighters. It admits having selected picked pilots,
because there was the credit of the old Navy to consider. Each squadron was
entrusted to the care of a seasoned veteran of fully twenty-five summers, and of the
flight leaders there was one that had even turned twenty-one. In short the Navy-
that-Flies was sending of its best; and its worst was very good indeed.
They flew away from the coast and the sea, and their motor transport rumbled
through the empty plains of France, till they closed upon the fringe of the
entrenched army. Here perched above the surrounding country on some plateau or
hill-side, with the ceaseless murmur of the guns in their ears, each of the squadrons
rigged its flagstaff and hoisted the White Ensign, set up the grey-painted huts and
the ship’s bell that divided the day into ship-watches, slung their hammocks, and
announced that they were ready to “co-operate” with anybody or anything.
The Army-that-Flies laughed at the ship’s bell and the rest of the naval
shibboleth, but it took the visitors to its heart. With hands deep in the pockets of its
“slacks” and pipe in mouth it came over and examined the fighting machines of the
Navy-that-Flies and the “doo-hickies” thereof, and it said things under its breath.
The Navy-that-Flies did not waste much time looking about it. One fire-eater
setting off to explore the country some thirty miles behind the German lines came
upon a school of “Quirks.” Quirks, it may be explained for the benefit of bipeds,
are young Boche aviators in an embryonic stage. From the convenient ambush of a
cloud he watched their antics for a while, as they flopped about above their
aerodrome; and then, descending like a thunderbolt, he tumbled three over,
scattered the remainder and returned to make his report. The squadron listened
gravely to the story and concluded that the Golden Age had dawned.
But sterner work lay ahead, and a fair sample of it is contained in the report of
another young gentleman who went scouting singlehanded over the German lines
what time the “gentlemen of England” were, if not abed, cracking the first of their
breakfast eggs.
He was attacked by two single-seated “Albatross” machines and a Halberstadt
fighter. Into the engine of the latter he emptied a tray of cartridges, with the result
that it immediately went spinning down; to make assurance doubly sure he fired
another fifty rounds into the whirling wreck as it fell.
By this time a veritable hornet’s nest appears to have risen about his ears; three
more “Albatross” machines whirred to the attack, and in his subsequent report he
notes with artistic enjoyment that the head of one pilot precisely filled the ring of
his sight. This eye for detail enabled him to recall the fact that he actually saw three
bullets strike the pilot’s head, with the not surprising result that the would-be-
avenger heeled over and sped to the ground.
By this time he had been driven down to a height of 200 feet above German-
occupied territory, and, having lost sight of the remainder of his aggressors, he
decided to return home at that height.
As was to be expected, his adventures were by no means terminated by this
decision. An astonished company of German cavalry drew rein and peppered him
with rifle-shots as he whisked over the tops of their lances. Five minutes later
another “Albatross” attacked him.
He rocked the machine in giddy sweeps until within fifty yards of his opponent,
and side-looped over him (this, remember, at 200 feet from the ground), fired a
short burst and drove the Hun off for a moment while he regained equilibrium.
Then once more the enemy swooped upon him.
From this point onwards the reader may be warned against vertigo. The pilot’s
own version, the bald official report of the affair, requires no embellishment or
comment, though the latter is not easy to suppress.
“These operations,” he states, “were repeated several times with a slight
variation in the way I looped over him (flying against a head wind). When he was
about 150 yards behind me, I looped straight over him, and coming out of the loop
dived at him and fired a good long burst. I saw nearly all the bullets go into the
pilot’s back, just on the edge of the cockpit. He immediately dived straight into the
ground.
“I then went over the German trenches filled with soldiers, and was fired on by
machine guns, rifles, and small field guns, in or out” (Ye Gods and Little Fishes!)
“of range. There were many shells bursting in and about the German trenches.”
The report concluded with estimates of the strength of various bodies of
infantry and cavalry, movements of convoy and artillery noticed during the
intervals between aerial somersaults. The pilot landed at the first aerodrome he saw
—adding, in explanation of such an irregular proceeding, that his machine was
badly shot about.
The squadrons co-operating with the R.F.C. commenced by faithfully recording
all aerial combats in which their machines were engaged. But after a while such
events became too commonplace to chronicle. They fought from dawn to dusk,
generally a day’s journey for a horse behind the German lines. They fought at
altitudes at which in spring a thermometer registered 50° of frost, returning with
petrol tanks frozen, and hands and feet and ears swollen by frost-nip. One squadron
had a hundred decisive fights in a month (omitting skirmishes), and accounted for
twenty-five Boche machines. Its log (unofficially termed “Game-book”) contained
such entries as the following: “Four machines went up: managed to bag five Huns
before breakfast.”
For the first time in their lives the pilots got all the fighting they wanted, and
revelled in it gluttonously. They grew fine-drawn, with the accentuated brilliancy
of eye common to men in perfect condition living at the highest tension. They met
Winged Death hourly in the blue loneliness above the clouds; the rustle of his sable
wings became a sound familiar as the drone of their own engines, so that all terror
of the Destroyer passed out of their souls—if indeed it had ever entered there.
And Death in his turn grew merciful, amazed. At least this is the only
explanation to offer for certain tales that are told along the Front, where the White
Ensign flies.
But hear for yourselves and judge.
A Naval pilot—a Canadian, by the way—attacked a single-seater “Albatross”
scout at 8,000 feet above the German lines. He disposed of him after a short
engagement, and was then attacked by seven others who drove him down to 3,000
feet and shot his machine to pieces. He plunged to the ground and crashed amid the
wreck of his machine a couple of hundred yards behind the Canadian lines,
breaking a leg and dislocating a shoulder. A furious bombardment from German
heavy artillery was in progress at the time, and he crawled into a shell-hole, where
he remained from 9 a.m. until 4 p.m. Fire then having slackened, a party from the
trenches went in search of his body with a view to burying it, and found him
conscious and cheerful, though very thirsty.
The Navy-that-Flies is witness that I lie not.
As far as bombing operations are concerned, the Navy-that-Flies confines its
attentions principally to the German bases along the Belgian coast, and any lurking
submarines or vagrant destroyers observed in the vicinity. Bombing is carried out
by both aeroplanes and seaplanes, and differs from other forms of war flying in that
it is principally performed at night.
The function of the bombing machine is to reach its given objective in as short a
time as possible, without provoking more “scraps” on the way than are inevitable,
to “deliver the goods,” and, if not brought down by anti-aircraft fire, to return with
all speed. They are not primarily fighters, and when laden with bombs are not
theoretically a match for a hostile fighting machine with unfettered manœuvring
powers.
Engine-trouble or loss of stability over enemy territory means almost infallible
capture or death for the pilot of a bombing aeroplane. Yet in cases of disablement,
rather than come down on the ground and suffer themselves or their machine to be
taken prisoner, it is their gallant tradition to try to struggle out to sea. Here they
stand about as much chance of life as a pheasant winged above a lake, but the
machine sinks before German hands can touch it.
Now it happened that on one such occasion the descent into the sea of a
bombing machine was observed by two French flying boats which were out on
patrol. The distressed machine was still within range of the shore batteries, and the
Boches, smarting under the effect of the bombs she had succeeded in dropping,
were retaliating in the most approved Germanic manner by plastering the helpless
machine with shrapnel as she slowly sank.
The two French flying boats sped to the rescue and alighted in the water beside
the wrecked British machine. One embarked the observer, who was wounded, and,
in spite of redoubled fire from the shore, succeeded in returning safely. The other
French flying-boat actually embarked the remaining occupants of the bombing
machine, but was hit as it rose from the water and fell disabled. The French pilot,
seeing a Boche seaplane approaching, and a bevy of small craft in-shore coming
out against them, scribbled a message to say that his venture had failed; he found
time to add, however, with true Gallic dauntlessness of spirit, “Vive la France!”
This missive he fastened to the leg of his carrier pigeon, and succeeded in releasing
it before rescuers and rescued were taken prisoners.
From time to time curt official announcements of successful bomb-raids upon
German destroyer and submarine bases appear in the press. It may be that the
Naval honours or casualties lists are swelled thereby. But no one who has not stood
in the wind that blows across the bombers’ aerodrome at night, in those last tense
moments before the start, can form any idea of the conditions under which these
grim laurels are earned.
One by one the leather-clad pilots conclude their final survey and climb up into
their machines. They adjust goggles and gloves: there is a warning “Stand clear!”
and the darkness fills with roaring sound as No. 1 starts his engine. For a moment
longer he sits in the utter isolation of darkness and the deafening noise of his own
engine. No further sounds can reach him; not another order nor the valedictory
“Good luck!” from those whose lot it is to only stand and wait. He settles himself
comfortably and fingers the familiar levers and throttle; then with a jerk the
bomber starts along the uneven ground, gathers way, and rising, speeds droning
into the darkness like a gigantic cockchafer. A moment later No. 2 follows, then
another, and another. The night swallows them, and the sound of their engines dies
away.
A couple of hours later in one of the grey-painted huts that fringe the aerodrome
a telephone bell jangles. The squadron commander picks up the receiver and holds
converse with a tiny metallic voice that sounds very far away; the conversation
ends, he puts on his cap and goes out into the darkness; a few minutes later a
sudden row of lights across the aerodrome makes bright pin-pricks in the darkness.
From far away in the air comes the hum of an engine growing momentarily louder.
It grows louder and clearer as the homing machine circles overhead and finally
comes to earth with a rushing wind and the scramble of men’s feet invisible.
The pilot climbs stiffly out of his seat, pushing up his goggles, and puckers his
eyes in the light of the lanterns as he fumbles for his cigarette case. “Got ’em,” he
says laconically. “Seaplane sheds on the mole. Time for another trip?”
There is time, it appears. He drinks hot coffee while the armourers snap a fresh
supply of bombs into the holders and test the release gear. He answers questions
curtly and his replies are very much to the point.
Their “Archies” are shooting well, and they’ve got a lot more searchlights at
work than they had last time. Rather warm work while it lasted. He thinks No. 1
was hit and brought down in flames. No. 2 seemed to have engine trouble this side
of our lines on the way back. No. 3 ought to be along soon. And while he gulps his
coffee and grunts monosyllables there is a whirring overhead and No. 3 returns,
loudly demanding a fresh supply of bombs with which to put an artistic finish to a
row of blazing oil-tanks.
They climb into their machines again and lean back resting, while the finishing
touches (which sometimes come between life and death) are put to the machines
and their deadly freight. Then once more they soar up into the night.
Dawn is breaking when No. 4 returns, tired-eyed, and more monosyllabic than
ever. It came off all right, but No. 3 had seemed to lose control and slid down the
beam of a searchlight with shells and balls of red fire (some new stunt, he
supposed) bursting all about her. However, she got her bombs off first, and touched
up something that sent a flame 200 feet into the air. He himself bombed a group of
searchlights that were annoying him, and some trucks in a railway siding. The
speaker has an ugly shrapnel wound in the thigh and observes with grave humour
that his boots are full of blood—this is a Navy joke, by the way. Also that he could
do with a drink.
But it came off all right.
Now the seaplanes, who undertake much the same sort of job, keep pigs, and
contemplate their stern mission with an extinguishable and fathomless sense of
humour. This may be accounted for by the fact that in life and death they are more
in touch with the native element of the Navy-that-Floats and share much of its
light-heartedness in consequence.
Aerial gymnastics are not in their line. They fight when they must, and the
straightest shot wins. If hit, unless hopelessly out of control, they take to the water
like a wounded duck. If the damage is beyond temporary repair they sit on the
surface and pray for the dawn and a tow from a friendly destroyer.
No aerial adventure is ever recounted (and the array of medal ribbons round
their mess table is witness to the quality of these blindfold flights) without its
humorous aspect well-nigh obliterating all else. One who fought a Zeppelin single-
handed with a Webley-Scott pistol and imprecations found himself immortalised
only in the pages of a magazine of Puck-like humour they publish (Fate and funds
permitting) monthly. Another, disabled on the water off an enemy’s port, succeeded
in getting his engine going as the crew of an armed trawler were leaning over the
bows with boat-hooks to secure him. He rose from the water beneath their
outstretched hands, and recalled with breathless merriment nothing but the
astonishment on their Teutonic faces. A third, similarly disabled, was approached
on the surface by a German submarine. He raked her deck with his Lewis gun and
kept her at bay—by the simple expedient of picking off every head that appeared
above her conning-tower—until she wearied of the sport and withdrew. From a
seaplane point of view it was a pretty jest.
At the conclusion of a day’s aerial fighting on the Somme front a certain officer
of the Navy-that-Flies was asked how he felt about it.
“Wa-al ...” he drawled, and paused, groping in his mind for metaphor. “It’s jest
like stealing candy from a kid.”
Making all allowances for poetic licence, this is a very fair illustration of the
spirit in which the Navy-that-Flies went about the business. On the other hand
there were a few who took a graver view of their responsibilities.
Among the possessions of one of the naval squadrons co-operating with the
Army-that-Flies along the front is a foolscap manuscript notebook bearing the
superscription Notes on Aerial Fighting. The youthful author of these notes will
never handle either pen or “joy-stick” again, but he has left behind him a document
that is, in its way, one of the epics of war literature. It has since been printed (in
expurgated form), and has doubtless found its way into textbooks and treatises on
the subject. But to be appreciated to the full it should be read in the original round,
rather boyish handwriting, within hearing of the continuous murmur of the British
guns and the drone of a scouting fighter passing overhead.
It contains ten commandments, which, for a variety of reasons, need not be
recapitulated here. But the introduction epitomises the spirit of them all:
“The man who gets most Huns in his lifetime is the man who observes these
commandments and fights with his head. The others either get killed or get nerves
in a very short time and the country does not get the full benefit of having trained
them.”
The commandments conclude with the following exhortation: “A very pleasant
(sic) help in time of trouble is to put yourself in the enemy’s place and view the
situation from his point of view. If you feel frightened before an attack, just think
how frightened he must be!”
The Navy-that-Floats possesses for its “pleasant help” an awesome volume of
some 946 pages (not counting Addenda), entitled The King’s Regulations and
Admiralty Instructions. Yet in all its pages there is not one clause which can
compare with this brave sentence: for this is youth speaking to youth, for the
guidance and comfort of his soul.
Now in one of the squadrons of the Navy-that-Flies there are three flight
leaders, and the sum total of their ages is fifty-nine. The youngest, whatever his
birth certificate may testify, looks something under sixteen. Of him it is related that
in his early youth, having brought down a hostile machine within the British lines
and captured the two occupants (with Iron Crosses complete), he approached a
certain general, demanding transport for his prisoners—covering them the while
with an automatic pistol.
“Transport?” said the general. “Where d’you want to take them?”
“To my squadron headquarters,” was the grave reply. “I’d like to keep ’em for a
bit. I’d like the others to see ’em.”
“Damn it,” replied the General, “they ain’t canaries. Certainly not. Send ’em to
the cages with the rest of the prisoners.”
The victor flew sorrowfully homewards, and on arrival gave it as his opinion
that professional jealousy was the ruination of the Junior Service....
They are not given to talking over-much of their achievements in the hearing of
a stranger within their gates. The second youngest of the trio admitted,
contemplating his cow-hide boots, to have “done-in” twelve hostile machines in
single combat—and lapsed into agonised silence.
“Of course,” said the third, coming to the rescue of a comrade in palpable
distress, “N., the star Frenchman, is the fellow to talk if you want to hear some
good yarns.” The speaker had the grave, sweet face of a mediæval knight, and the
owner of the cow-hide boots shot him a swift glance of gratitude.
“He’s done-in fifty Huns,” he confirmed, nodding.
It was on the following day, as it happened, that Fate introduced the Frenchman
to the Stranger within the Gates of the Navy-that-Flies. The flying man landed on
one of the aerodromes of the Navy-that-Flies, a florid-faced young man, chubby
and blue-eyed. The squadron strolled out to greet him with ready hospitality and
hero-worship.
“Bon jour, N.,” said the squadron commander. “How goes it?”
The famous French fighting pilot swung himself out of his machine and pulled
off his gauntlet. He wore, in addition to the regulation flying helmet, a bright-blue
muffler wound with many turns round the lower part of his face, and a soiled
aquascutum with a row of medal-ribbons reaching half-way across his breast. The
wind fluttered its skirts, disclosing a pair of tight red breeches above top-boots of a
light yellow. As an additional protection against the cold his feet were encased in
fur moccasins. He greeted the Navy-that-Flies in rapid French and threw their
ranks into some disorder.
“Translate, George,” said the squadron commander.
“He says he’s on sick leave,” explained one of the hosts. “He’s just flying to
keep his eye in. He scuppered five Boches last week.”
“Si,” said the Frenchman, nodding, and held up his hand with outstretched
fingers, “Cinq!”
“Good on you, old sport,” said the squadron commander. They shook hands
again, and the remainder clustered rather curiously round the sinister machine with
the black skull and cross-bones adorning its fusilage.
“Makes one sort of sorry for the Hun, doesn’t it?” said one musingly.
“George,” said another, “ask him what that doo-hickie on the muzzle of his
gun’s for.” He indicated a detail on the mounting.
The Frenchman explained at some length, and the interpreter interpreted.
“Bon!” said the squadron commander.
“Oui,” said the Frenchman, “tres bon! You ’ave not eet—cette—comment dites
vous?—doo-hickie? No?”
“No,” was the reply, “mais nous blooming well allons——”
The Frenchman presently climbed back into his machine and took his departure.
The squadron commander summoned his chief armourer, and for a while deep
called to deep.
“He’s a red-hot lad, that Frenchman,” said the squadron commander, when the
chief armourer had gone. “I fancy he only came down to let us see that doo-hickie
of his on his gun. You ought to hear some of his yarns, though.”
The Stranger within the Gates of the Navy-that-Flies gazed after the aerial
speck against the blue of heaven, and his soul was glad within him, because it was
all the purest Navy.
“That’s all right,” he said. “But what I should like to know is, what the deuce is
a doo-hickie?”
“A doo-hickie?” replied the squadron commander. “A doo-hickie? H’m’m.
George, how would you describe a doo-hickie?”
The officer appealed to puffed his pipe in silence for a moment. “Well,” he said
at length, “you know more or less what a gadget’s like?”
“Yes.”
“And a gilguy?”
“Yes.”
“Well, a doo-hickie is something like that, only smaller as a rule.”
There was a silence. Then the squadron commander leaned forward and flicked
a speck of fluff off the shoulder of the Stranger within their Gates.
“There you are!” he exclaimed triumphantly—“that’s a doo-hickie!”
“Have a drink, anyway,” said the officer who answered to the name of George,
soothingly.
The Stranger within the Gates of the Navy-that-Flies had the drink, and from
then onwards forbore to ask any more questions.
But he still sometimes wonders what the functions of a doo-hickie might be.
CHAPTER IV
“LEST WE FORGET”
I. H.M.S. “Shark”
H.M.S. Shark, under the command of Commander Loftus W. Jones, went into
action about 5.45 p.m. on May 31st, 1916 with a complement of ninety-one
officers and men; of that number only six saw June 1st dawn.
In spite of the soul-shaking experience through which they passed, these six
men have remembered sufficient details of the action to enable the following
record to be pieced together. Many stirring acts of gallantry and self-sacrifice, and
much of interest to the relatives and friends of those who were lost, must inevitably
be lacking from this narrative. But the evidence shows such supreme human
courage and devotion to duty in the face of death, that, incomplete as it is, the story
remains one of the most glorious in the annals of the Navy.
At two o’clock on the afternoon of May 31st the Shark and three other
destroyers, Acasta, Ophelia, and Christopher, were acting as a submarine screen to
the Third Battle Cruiser Squadron, with the light cruisers Chester and Canterbury
in company. The force was steaming on a southerly course in advance of the
British Battle Fleet, which was engaged in one of its periodical sweeps of the North
Sea.
This advance squadron was under the command of Rear-Admiral the Hon.
Horace A. L. Hood, C.B., M.V.O., D.S.O., flying his flag in Invincible.
The main Battle Cruiser Fleet and the Fifth Battle Squadron were considerably
farther to the southward, and at 2.20 p.m. the light cruisers attached to this force
signalled by wireless the first intimation that the enemy’s fleet was at sea.
Subsequent reports confirmed this, and acting on the information contained in
these intercepted messages, Rear-Admiral Hood ordered the ship’s companies to
“Action Stations,” and shaped course to intercept the advancing enemy.
At 3.48 p.m. the Battle Cruiser Fleet and the Fifth Battle Squadron engaged the
German Main Fleet and turned north with the object of drawing the enemy towards
the British Battle Fleet. It must be remembered that at this point the enemy was
presumably in complete ignorance of the approach of the British Main Fleet. The
weather was hazy, with very little wind and patches of mist that reduced the
visibility to an extent that varied from one to eight miles.
At 4.4 p.m. Rear-Admiral Hood received orders from Admiral Sir John Jellicoe,
Commander-in-Chief, to proceed at full speed with his squadron and reinforce the
Battle Cruiser Fleet; the Third Battle Cruiser Squadron altered course as necessary,
and an hour and a half later the first sounds of firing reached them out of the mists
ahead.
The first faint intermittent murmur of sound increased momentarily as the two
forces converged, and at 5.40 p.m. the haze on the starboard bow was pierced by
flashes of gunfire; a few minutes later a force of German light cruisers and
destroyers became visible, heavily engaged with an unseen opponent to the
westward.
Fire was immediately opened and Rear-Admiral Hood turned to starboard,
bringing the enemy on to the port bow of his squadron. Three light cruisers, a
flotilla leader, and ten destroyers were now visible, the latter apparently turning to
launch a torpedo attack upon the Third Battle Cruiser Squadron. The four
destroyers who had hitherto been disposed in two subdivisions, one on each bow of
the Invincible, were thereupon ordered to attack the enemy. Led by Commander
Loftus Jones in the Shark, the division swung round, and hurled itself at the
German force, opening fire with every gun that would bear.
In the meanwhile the enemy opened a heavy though ill-directed fire on the
battle cruisers. A large proportion of the salvos were falling short, and the British
destroyers had in consequence to advance through a barrage of fire which
surrounded them on all sides with columns of water and bursting shell.
In spite of their numerical superiority, the German destroyers turned away in the
face of this determined onslaught, and Commander Loftus Jones, satisfied that the
intended torpedo attack on Rear-Admiral Hood’s squadron had been frustrated, and
having fired two of his three torpedoes, turned sixteen points to regain his position
on the bow of the Invincible. The remaining three destroyers followed in his wake.
Three German battle cruisers had then appeared out of the mist in support of the
enemy light cruisers, and the gallant division, with Shark at their head, turned
under a concentrated deluge of shells from the entire German force.
A fragment of a projectile struck the Shark’s wheel, shattering it, and wounding
the coxswain, Petty Officer Griffin, on the right hand. The captain immediately
ordered the after wheel to be manned and followed the coxswain down the ladder
to the shell-torn upper-deck to con the ship from aft. The yeoman of signals, Petty
Officer Banham, who up to this point had been the third occupant of the bridge,
hurried after the captain.
The enemy were now using shrapnel, and the captain was wounded in the thigh
and face as he reached the bottom of the ladder. He stumbled aft, endeavouring to
staunch the flow of blood with his hands, to find on reaching the engine-room
hatchway that a shell had burst inside the engine-room, and the main engines and
steering gear were completely disabled. The coxswain had been struck at the same
time as the captain, and dropped insensible from a wound in the head. The
foremost gun, under the command of Sub-Lieutenant Vance, had been blown away,
and only one survivor of its crew lay badly wounded amid the wreckage.
The Shark was then lying with disabled engines helpless under a heavy fire, and
Lieutenant-Commander John O. Barren, who commanded the Acasta, and had been
second in the line, gallantly brought his destroyer between the Shark and the
enemy’s fire, and signalled to ask if he could be of any assistance. The captain of
the Shark was then aft, cheering and encouraging the crews of the midship and
after guns. The yeoman of signals, who remained at his side, read the signal and
reported it to the captain, who replied, “No. Tell him to look after himself and not
get sunk over us.”
The yeoman of signals accordingly semaphored Commander Jones’s last signal
to the division under his orders, and the Acasta followed in the wake of the other
two boats which were rejoining the battle cruisers.
It is probable that at this juncture Rear-Admiral Hood sighted the British Battle
Cruiser Fleet, which he had been ordered to reinforce, and proceeded to carry out
his orders. The Third Battle Cruiser Squadron vanished into the mist, and the
enemy closed in upon the Shark, which lay rolling helplessly in the swell, blazing
defiance from her after and midship guns.
The after gun was almost immediately put out of action and its crew killed and
wounded. Amid a hail of shrapnel bullets and flying splinters the spare torpedo was
hoisted off the rack, and, under the directions of the captain, was being launched
into the tube, when it was struck by a shell and burst with a violent explosion,
causing heavy casualties.
Only one gun, the midship one, now remained in action. The ship was settling
down by the bows and every moment she shuddered with the impact of a fresh hit.
The riven upper-deck was a shambles, and the dead, mingled with shattered
wreckage, were blown hither and thither by the blast of exploding shell. Projectiles,
pitching short, flung great columns of water into the air, or passed screaming
overhead; the upper-works were riddled by splinters from bursting salvos.
One by one the wounded crawled brokenly into the lee of the casings and
funnels in pitiful attempts to find shelter; among them knelt the devoted figure of
the surgeon (Surgeon-Probationer Robert Walker, R.N.V.R.), endeavouring single-
handed to cope with his gallant, hopeless task. When last seen he was bandaging a
man who had lost a hand when the torpedo exploded. He was then himself severely
wounded, and was apparently shortly afterwards killed.