Complaint - Unlawful Detainer
Complaint - Unlawful Detainer
Complaint - Unlawful Detainer
x-------------------------------x
COMPLAINT
PLAINTIFF, by counsel, and unto this Honorable Court, most respectfully
allege: THAT
1. Plaintiff is of legal age, Filipino, with residence and postal address at David St.,
Purok 5, Rosario, Santiago City where she may be served notices and other court
processes;
2. Respondent is of legal age, Filipino, with residence and postal address at House
No. 97, Metroville Subdivision, Rosario, Santiago City;
3. Plaintiff is the absolute owner and lessor of that certain apartment situated in
Metroville Subdivision, Rosario, Santiago City and now leased and occupied by
the respondent;
4. Pursuant to the lease contract (Exhibit A) executed by the plaintiff and the
respondent dated October 28, 2022, the respondent is obliged to pay a monthly
rental payment of P10,000.00 to the plaintiff;
5. A stipulation in the said lease contract provides that in case of default by the lessee
of the payment of the rent such as when the checks are dishonored, the plaintiff at
its option may terminate the said contract and eject the lessee;
6. On September 1, 2023, the plaintiff tried to encash BPI Check No. 25613
corresponding to the rental payment for the month of August but the same was
dishonored due to insufficiency of funds;
7. On the same day, plaintiff informed the respondent that the latter’s check was
dishonored and demanded that formed be paid in cash instead but the respondent
failed to do so;
8. On September 2, 2023, plaintiff again went to the respondent and demanded for
the payment of the dishonored check and for respondent to vacate the premises but
respondent failed to tender payment and refused to vacate the premises;
9. On September 11, 2023, plaintiff, with assistance of a counsel, sent a formal
demand letter (Exhibit B) to the respondent giving him ten (10) days to make his
rental payment and vacate the premises;
11.On September 25, 2023, at the expiration of the ten-day grace period given by the
plaintiff, the respondent still has not made his payment and consistently refused to
vacate the apartments;
12. Until now, respondent still refuses to vacate and restore possession and pay his
rentals;
13. Thus, respondent is unlawfully withholding possession of the subject apartment
from the plaintiff despite last and final demand, to the damage and prejudice of the
plaintiff;
14. Before filing this complaint, the dispute has been referred to the Lupong
Tagapamayapa of Rosario, Santiago City but the respondent failed to appear,
hence, no amicable settlement was made (Exhibit C).
PRAYER
WHEREFORE, premises considered, it is most respectfully prayed of this
Honorable Court that after due notice and hearing, judgment be rendered in favor
of Plaintiff:
1. For the restitution of the abovementioned apartment;
2. For the payment of TWENTY THOUSAND PESOS (P20,000.00), Philippine
currency, representing the arrears of rent now overdue;
3. To pay the cost of the suit
Other reliefs just and equitable under the premises are likewise prayed for.
Rosario, Santiago City Philippines, December 12, 2023.
__________________
(Sgd.) Malou D. Paloloko