Textbook Energetic Materials Advanced Processing Technologies For Next Generation Materials 1St Edition Mark J Mezger Ed Ebook All Chapter PDF
Textbook Energetic Materials Advanced Processing Technologies For Next Generation Materials 1St Edition Mark J Mezger Ed Ebook All Chapter PDF
Textbook Energetic Materials Advanced Processing Technologies For Next Generation Materials 1St Edition Mark J Mezger Ed Ebook All Chapter PDF
https://textbookfull.com/product/advanced-processing-and-
manufacturing-technologies-for-nanostructured-and-
multifunctional-materials-iii-issue-8-1st-edition-tatsuki-ohji/
https://textbookfull.com/product/materials-and-processes-for-
next-generation-lithography-1st-edition-alex-robinson-and-
richard-lawson-eds/
https://textbookfull.com/product/mesoporous-materials-for-
advanced-energy-storage-and-conversion-technologies-1st-edition-
jiang/
https://textbookfull.com/product/mesoporous-materials-for-
advanced-energy-storage-and-conversion-technologies-1st-edition-
san-ping-jiang/
https://textbookfull.com/product/mesoporous-materials-for-
advanced-energy-storage-and-conversion-technologies-1st-edition-
san-ping-jiang-2/
https://textbookfull.com/product/mechanics-for-materials-and-
technologies-altenbach/
https://textbookfull.com/product/next-generation-dna-led-
technologies-1st-edition-sharada-avadhanam/
https://textbookfull.com/product/textile-materials-for-
lightweight-constructions-technologies-methods-materials-
properties-1st-edition-chokri-cherif-eds/
Energetic Materials
Energetic Materials
Advanced Processing Technologies
for Next-Generation Materials
Edited by
Mark J. Mezger
Kay J. Tindle
Michelle Pantoya
Lori J. Groven
Dilhan M. Kalyon
CRC Press
Taylor & Francis Group
6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 300
Boca Raton, FL 33487-2742
This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. Reasonable efforts
have been made to publish reliable data and information, but the author and publisher cannot assume
responsibility for the validity of all materials or the consequences of their use. The authors and publishers
have attempted to trace the copyright holders of all material reproduced in this publication and apologize to
copyright holders if permission to publish in this form has not been obtained. If any copyright material has
not been acknowledged please write and let us know so we may rectify in any future reprint.
Except as permitted under U.S. Copyright Law, no part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced, transmit-
ted, or utilized in any form by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented,
including photocopying, microfilming, and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system,
without written permission from the publishers.
For permission to photocopy or use material electronically from this work, please access www.copyright.
com (http://www.copyright.com/) or contact the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. (CCC), 222 Rosewood
Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, 978-750-8400. CCC is a not-for-profit organization that provides licenses and
registration for a variety of users. For organizations that have been granted a photocopy license by the CCC,
a separate system of payment has been arranged.
Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used
only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe.
Names: Mezger, Mark J., editor. | Tindle, Kay J., editor. | Pantoya,
Michelle, editor. | Groven, Lori J., editor. | Kalyon, Dilhan M., editor.
Title: Energetic materials : advanced processing technologies for
next-generation materials / [edited by] Mark J. Mezger, Kay J. Tindle,
Michelle Pantoya, Lori J. Groven and Dilhan M. Kalyon.
Other titles: Energetic materials (CRC Press)
Description: Boca Raton : Taylor & Francis, CRC Press, 2017. | Includes
bibliographical references and index.
Identifiers: LCCN 2016059724 | ISBN 9781138032507 (hardback : acid-free paper)
| ISBN 9781315166865 (electronic)
Subjects: LCSH: Explosives. | Chemical processes.
Classification: LCC TP271 .E54 2017 | DDC 662/.2--dc23
LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2016059724
v
vi Contents
ix
x Preface
Kay J. Tindle currently serves as the senior director for the Research Development
Team in the Office of the Vice President for Research at Texas Tech University,
Lubbock, Texas. She earned her BA in teaching English as a foreign language from
Oklahoma Christian University, Edmond, Oklahoma, her MEd in adult and higher
education from the University of Central Oklahoma, Edmond, Oklahoma and her
Ph.D. in higher education research from Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas. Her
research focuses on multidisciplinary teams as mechanisms of accountability, com-
munication practices and innovations among multidisciplinary teams, and women
leaders in higher education.
xi
xii Editors
xiii
xiv Contributors
Ronald J. White
Center for Advanced Mineral and
Metallurgical Processing (CAMP)
and
Department of Materials Science
Montana Tech of the University
of Montana
Butte, Montana
Introduction
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ENERGETIC MATERIALS DOMAIN
Scope
The Department of Defense (DoD) Energetic Materials (EM) mission encompasses
the entire life cycle of the products. As depicted in Figure I.1, the life cycle of prod-
ucts within the DoD is broken out in discrete sections, taking technology from con-
cepts investigated in the laboratory through development to production, operational
sustainment, and removal from service.
Depending on the service and system under consideration, the life cycle ele-
ments of a product are managed by different organizations. In the specific case for
EMs, there is no overarching plan for the complete life cycle between the managing
organizations.
productS
The EM products associated with DoD weapon systems are explosives, gun propel-
lants, rocket propellants, and pyrotechnics. Explosives are generally used for terminal
effects in firing trains and warhead main charges, whereas gun and rocket propel-
lants are used for the propulsion systems of munitions and missiles. Pyrotechnics are
utilized for several purposes: to generate visible light, smoke as obscurants, and heat
as anti-aircraft decoys. Each of these products has its own type of reaction, which
occurs in microseconds in the case of explosives, or in several minutes as in the case
of pyrotechnics.
For each material, the output and its corresponding sensitivity to reaction from
various stimuli are critical to handling safety and weapon system survivability.
For explosives, the goal is to maximize energy output in terms of Gurney energy
(an explosive’s ability to accelerate metal) or its brisance (an explosive’s ability to
move earth), while minimizing its sensitivity to impact, friction, heat, and electro-
static shocks. Gun propellants are different from explosives in that the material devel-
opment seeks to create compounds that maximize a specific impulse (Isp) during
burning with minimal flame temperatures. Gun propellant formulators also have to
be concerned with material sensitivity to external stimuli in order to maximize safety
in service during the product’s usable life. Rocket propellants also try to maximize
xvii
xviii Introduction
burning characteristics while minimizing their smoke signature along with material
sensitivity concerns.
The processing, storage, and handling of these materials are also uniquely differ-
ent. Certain materials cannot be stored and/or processed in close proximity due to
safety compatibility concerns. This is true not only in case of primary and secondary
explosives, but also with explosives and some pyrotechnic or propellant ingredients.
As a result of these material incompatibilities, safety protocols and material allow-
ances for processing have to be strictly regulated.
MiSSion
The DoD is always looking to identify and employ the best technology that will
provide warfighters with the most effective weaponry possible. To accomplish this
mission, the energetics community within the DoD must monitor advanced technol-
ogy developments nationally and internationally to identify the best technologies to
address issues with military systems. Once unique and innovative technologies are
identified, it is up to the people in the service laboratories to coordinate and facilitate
the linkage between technology providers and people who understand military sys-
tems to realize creative solutions for the warfighter.
congreSS
The House Armed Services Committee in the 2009 Defense Authorization Act
directed the Secretary of Defense to assess the current state of—and future advances
Introduction xix
reSponSe to congreSS
In response to the 2009 congressional directive, the Department of Defense, Office
of Research and Engineering (DDR&E) conducted a Life Cycle assessment of EMs
as depicted in Figure I.1. A key point from this study is outlined as follows:
are not readily interchangeable. To date, there are relatively few industrial and aca-
demic performers that exist in the EM area largely because it is nearly exclusively a
DoD need. The resulting consequence of this is that the DoD laboratories developed
all of the currently fielded tactical and strategic propulsion systems that are produced
by DoD contractors. Advances in EMs tied to achieving specific objectives and solu-
tions will almost surely result from in-house competencies.
Future weapon systems that are based on advanced EM will provide longer stand-
off distances, shorter times to target, greater weapon versatility, and greater effec-
tiveness with smaller payloads. We do need not only new and better EMs, but also a
cost-effective and efficient means to deliver them to the warfighter.
Investment
Higher performance Reduced sensitivity
d
d
i
se
h
o
fe
re
a
n
m
Te evel
Te emo
rc
/
p asi
la per
su eve
te sea
c n
ch op
a
ht
s c olo
n
y
Sy bs lop
st,
o
Sy unc atio
Ba chn rch
Re rove bilit
no stra
te d
gy
y
ol men
ste h ns
te yste me
og t
lo tio
gy n
m m nt
FIGURE I.2 Life cycle capability gaps, NGEM valley of death.
xxi
xxii
Purpose of the program is to design, install, and prove out advanced process lines for legacy and next generation energetic materials.
• The motivation for this program stems from PEO ammunition’s desire to have energetic materials that are easy to load and easy to manufacture.
• Future materials with disruptive advances cannot be easily produced in the current NTIB. These materials will require modern manufacturing processes in order for the
warfighter to utilize their benefits.
• The APPL capability needs to extend to legacy materials in order to enable and streamline product changeovers as process technologies change in the future with the ability to
go back to traditional materials if needed.
• The Army is currently considering making a large investment for the modernization of Holston and Radford AAPs. This provides an opportunity to incorporate the latest
materials manufacturing processes.
Purpose of this thrust area is to develop process Purpose of this thrust area is to develop Purpose of this thrust area is to develop process
technologies that reduce or eliminate manned manufacturing processes for bulk energetics that technologies that have traditionally been batch
operations associated with the integration of incorporate production technologies from other oriented and transition to continuous ones.
energetics into armament systems. industries that are utilizing nano scale and/or
nano structured components. • The motivation for this thrust is improved safety
• The motivation for this thrust is improved safety and reliability and ease of product changeover.
and reliability and ease of product changeover. • Motivation for this thrust is based on sensitivity
results of nano nitramines. These materials • Continuous processes utilize smaller quantities
• The integration of energetics with electronics have the same energy output of RDX or HMX of materials while in operation which can
and other components to enable highly with half of the observed sensitivity. substantially reduce hazards in operations and
specialized munitions and effects. reduce operational safety arcs.
• Mixing nano scale materials using traditional
• Provide a means to rapidly prototype or mixing processes is difficult at best due to high
remotely manufacture small quantities of viscosities.
sophisticated munition items.
Introduction
Each thrust area attempts to look at processes associated with different aspects
of EM product development. The next-generation LAP is concerned with molding,
forming, and shaping, and the interfaces associated with the assembly of EM sub-
components into their intended applications. Flexible agile ingredient and formula-
tion processing is concerned with converting materials made from batch processes
to continuous ones where product flexibility and agile capacity can be maximized.
The nanoenergetics area looks to bring the manufacturing technology from other
industries and adopt them for use with EMs. Of particular interest in this area is
the processing and coating of nano-organic materials while giving consideration
to the hazards associated with the reactivity of small particles.
Many of the processes for EMs are utilized by other industries. In order to adapt
these processes for use with EMs, it is critical that all of the fate and transport phe-
nomena associated with material production be understood. This starts with the
development of robust process models that take into account the reactive nature of
EMs. The successful completion of this modernization effort will produce several
process models for solubility, chemical solubility, chemical and reaction kinetics,
rheological behavior effecting process flows, crystallization, physical properties, and
terminal effects. Once these models are developed and validated, compound cre-
ation, processing, and terminal effects simulations can be conducted. Such simula-
tions should significantly reduce the development cycle times and testing required to
fully qualify new EMs for weapons use, accelerate their transition to the NTIB and
ultimate military fielding. The development of the requisite science and manufactur-
ing technologies associated with EM is the subject of Section I. Establishment of the
partnerships by forming the NEMI and the long-established National Armaments
Consortium is the subject of Section II.
OVERVIEW
Section i: critical Science and technologieS
in the liFe cycle oF energetic MaterialS
are presented along with some typical experimental methods. These models include
ab initio and molecular dynamics-based models for the polymorph prediction in
conjunction with various solvent and antisolvent systems and the dynamic material
and energy balance equations, solved in conjunction with population balance models
for the prediction of the number density of crystals as a function of time and size as
functions of the nucleation and growth kinetics for the particles.
solution-based coating methods are the important determinants of the ultimate prop-
erties of energetic particles. Various methods were developed and are available for
the quantitative characterization of the degree of mixedness (mixing indices) of
energetic formulations principally relying on X-ray diffraction or energy-dispersive
X-ray methods. Such mixing indices can differentiate between poor and better mix-
ing conditions and can be correlated with various types of ballistic and other proper-
ties of energetic formulations. Since the 1990s, comprehensive three-dimensional
(3D) finite element method-based solutions have been available that can be used in
conjunction with the determination of Poincaré sections and Lyapunov exponents for
the prediction of scale and intensity of segregation of the ingredients contained in
energetic formulations. A combination of the numerical simulation and experimental
characterization methods can provide better control and optimization of the mixing
operations, thus improving the quality of energetic formulations. Alternatively, EM
can be mixed and coated using solvent or solvent-free methods. Surface properties
of EMs have been studied using experimental and numerical simulation methods to
predict solvent-free mixing behaviors. Actual coating conditions can be identified
using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive X-Rays (EDX).
Energetic formulations can be placed in a casing upon mixing, and the loading pro-
cess is generally performed through casting, extruding, or pressing. The dynamics
of the loading are closely related to the microstructures of the final form, which
includes porosity, surface area, defects, and uniformity. All of these characteristics
will have an impact on the performance of the EMs.
the extrusion process and the formation of extrudate shape distortions emerging out
of the die are the important aspects and can be elucidated using time-dependent
computational source codes in conjunction with detailed rheological behavior of the
energetic formulation.
Section ii: the national technology and induStrial BaSe oF the Future
Chapter 11: Transition from Laboratory Innovation
to Production and Military Fielding
The responsibility of the DoD is the security of our country. The DoD mission
depends on our military and civilian personnel and equipment being in the right
place, at the right time, with the right capabilities, and in the right quantities to pro-
tect our national interests. This has never been more important as the United States
fights terrorists who plan and carry out attacks outside of the traditional boundaries
of the battlefield. This chapter outlines the DoD’s comprehensive strategic plan and
identifies the avenues for readers to learn more about current R&D initiatives among
the federal agencies. Of the many R&D areas of interest to the government and
industry, nanotechnology and additive manufacturing of both EMs and non-EMs are
a priority. This chapter discusses the DoD’s interest in EM research and the undeni-
able need for the transformation of traditional energetic manufacturing processes
and materials into more flexible and agile processes and materials through 2D and
3D printing of energetics and systems. There is a significant need for new technolo-
gies and equipment, which could make possible such transformation with the field
of EM.