The Boston Tea Party (Article) - Khan Academy
The Boston Tea Party (Article) - Khan Academy
The Boston Tea Party (Article) - Khan Academy
Google Classroom
After Parliament passed the Tea Act, American colonists reacted with a tea party
of their own.
Overview
The Boston Tea Party, which involved the willful destruction of 342
crates of British tea, proved a significant development on the path to the
American Revolution.
The Boston Tea Party, which occurred on December 16, 1773 and was
known to contemporaries as the Destruction of the Tea, was a direct
response to British taxation policies in the North American colonies.
The British response to the Boston Tea Party was to impose even more
stringent policies on the Massachusetts colony. The Coercive Acts levied
fines for the destroyed tea, sent British troops to Boston, and rewrote the
colonial charter of Massachusetts, giving broadly expanded powers to the
royally appointed governor.
When the British Prime Minister, Lord North, proposed the Tea Act in May
1773, he was not even thinking of the North American colonies, but rather of
the East India Company, which had assumed control over India. In
exchange for the power to appoint its governors, North loaned the company
£1.5 million—the equivalent of about $270 million today. North also granted
the company a monopoly on the right to sell tea in the North American
colonies.
Thomas Malton the Younger, London headquarters of the British East India Company, undated. Image
credit: Yale Center for British Art
Nathaniel Currier, print depicting the Boston Tea Party, 1846. Image credit: Wikimedia Commons
Paul Revere carried the news of the destruction of the tea to New York, which
in turn refused to allow the British ships to unload. In Philadelphia, as well,
townspeople gathered to turn the British ships away from harbor. In
Charleston, the ship was docked, but customs officials seized the cargo.
How important do you think the Boston Tea Party was in the ultimate outbreak
of war between Britain and its North American colonies?
Why do you think the British refused to back down in the face of opposition to
its policies?