Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 29 views

    Unit 3 Peer Review Editing Vincent 1

    Uploaded by

    api-743597225

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Unit 3 Peer Review Editing Vincent 1

    Uploaded by

    api-743597225
    29 views2 pages

    Original Title

    unit 3 peer review editing vincent 1

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    29 views2 pages

    Unit 3 Peer Review Editing Vincent 1

    Uploaded by

    api-743597225

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 2

    Unit 3 Peer Review: Editing, Vincent

    1. How is the essay organized? Does each paragraph contain one and only one main idea that
    connects to the thesis? Does this organization help move the ideas forward? Tell the author if
    the organization works or offer organization ideas.
    The essay is organized into distinct sections, with each paragraph generally containing one
    main idea that connects to the thesis. However, some paragraphs could benefit from clearer
    organization and tighter connection to the thesis. Overall, the organization works but could be
    improved for better coherence and flow.

    2. Where could the author use stronger transitions to strengthen connections between his/her
    points?
    The author could use stronger transitions between paragraphs to strengthen connections
    between points, particularly between sections discussing different rhetorical strategies used in
    the article.

    3. Does the author have any fragments, comma splices, or run-ons? If so, mark them in the text.
    If you know the rule, then go ahead and offer advice to the author. If you do not know the rule,
    then simply mention that something seems off.
    The essay is well-structured and free of fragments, comma splices, or run-ons.

    4. Where could the author use more detail to further illustrate his/her claim? Indicate these
    places in the text.
    The author could use more detail to further illustrate their claim in sections discussing specific
    examples of AI applications in network engineering and case studies.

    5. Are the style and tone of the essay appropriate for the audience?
    Yes, the style and tone of the essay are appropriate for the audience.

    6. Are the sentences and word choices varied? Does the author use strong, active verbs and
    solid, descriptive nouns? Indicate where the author could strengthen the verbs and nouns.
    Yes, the essay demonstrates varied sentences and word choices. The author generally uses
    strong, active verbs and solid, descriptive nouns. However, there are areas where the author
    could strengthen verbs and nouns to enhance clarity and impact.

    7. Is the author too repetitive or present too much information? In other words, does the essay
    overwhelm you as a reader because there is too much information or underwhelm you because
    there is too little information?
    The author strikes a balance in providing sufficient information without overwhelming the reader.

    8. Is the essay confusing because information has been omitted and/or too much information is
    assumed to be known by the readers?
    No, the essay is not confusing due to omitted information or assuming too much prior
    knowledge by the readers.
    9. Is the essay in the correct MLA format?
    yes this essay is in the correct MLA format

    10. Indicate in the text the author’s strengths and weaknesses.


    Strengths:
    - The author demonstrates a strong understanding of rhetorical analysis and effectively applies it
    to the peer-reviewed article.
    - Clear organization helps guide the reader through the analysis.
    - The essay maintains a professional tone suitable for the subject matter.

    Weaknesses:
    - Some paragraphs lack detailed examples or evidence to support the analysis.
    - Transitions between paragraphs could be smoother to improve the flow of ideas.
    - The discussion of potential rhetorical fallacies feels somewhat disconnected from the main
    argument.

    11. What are two or three revision suggestions you have for the writer?
    1. Provide more detailed examples and evidence to support the analysis, particularly in
    discussing specific AI applications in network engineering.
    2. Improve transitions between paragraphs for smoother flow and coherence.
    3. Ensure that all discussions, including potential rhetorical fallacies, are closely tied to and
    support the main argument.

    You might also like