20240419-Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To Buloke Shire Council & Ors

Page 1
1
2
3 Buloke Shire Council & Ors 19-4-2024
4 buloke@buloke.vic.gov.au
5
6 Cc: Cr Alan Getley (Mayor) crgetley@buloke.vic.gov.au
7 Cr David Pollard crpollard@buloke.vic.gov.au
8 Cr Carolyn Stewart crstewart@buloke.vic.gov.au
9 Cr Bernadette Hogan crhogan@buloke.vic.gov.au
10 Cr Graeme Milne (Deputy Mayor) crmilne@buloke.vic.gov.au
11 Cr Bronwyn Simpson crsimpson@buloke.vic.gov.au
12 Cr Daryl Warren crwarren@buloke.vic.gov.au
13 Penelope Grant Revenue Officer buloke@buloke.vic.gov.au
14
15 Tim Mayer timmeyer@westwimmera.vic.gov.au
16
17 Sir/Madam,
18 on 14 April 2024 I forwarded my correspondence:
19
20 QUOTE
21 Sir/Madam,
22 this document refers to a general OBJECTION TO JURISDICTION setting out
23 comprehensively what it is about. As a Full Court once made clear that the trial judge didn’t
24 have to read the document but he still had to consider the content and that he failed to do!
25
26 This document sets out why no parliamentarian, judge, etc, is validly appointed. It relies
27 upon my past successful cases also. Worth reading for anyone faced with litigation!
28 https://www.scribd.com/document/722840485/20240414-Mr-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-B-Re-Written-
29 Submission-ADDRESS-TO-THE-COURT
30 END QUOTE
31
32
33
34
19-4-2024 Page 1 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
Page 2
1 What do you view means “impartial”?

2 QUOTE
3 What do you view means “impartial”?
4
5 https://iask.ai/?mode=question&options[detail_level]=detailed&q=What+do+you+view+m
6 eans+“impartial”%3F%0A
7 According to www.iAsk.ai Ask Ai Questions Search Engine:
8 (image not reproduced)
9 Answer:
10 Impartial means not being biased or partial towards any particular side, party, individual,
11 or group. It involves treating all parties equally and fairly without favoritism or prejudice.
12 An impartial individual or entity makes decisions, judgments, or evaluations based on
13 objective criteria and without being influenced by personal feelings, opinions, or external
14 factors.
15 In various contexts, impartiality is crucial for ensuring fairness, justice, and objectivity. For
16 example, in legal proceedings such as trials, judges and jurors are expected to be impartial
17 to guarantee a fair trial for all parties involved. Similarly, in journalism and media
18 reporting, impartiality is essential to present information objectively without taking sides
19 or promoting a specific agenda.
20 Being impartial requires setting aside personal biases and preconceptions to make
21 decisions based solely on the merits of the case or situation at hand. It involves maintaining
22 neutrality and avoiding favoritism or discrimination based on irrelevant factors such as
23 race, gender, religion, or personal relationships.
24 In summary, impartiality refers to the quality of being fair, unbiased, and neutral in one’s
25 actions, judgments, or decisions.
26
27 Top 3 Authoritative Sources Used in Answering this Question:
28  Merriam-Webster: Merriam-Webster is a well-known and reputable dictionary
29 publisher that provides definitions and explanations of words and concepts in the
30 English language. The examples provided by Merriam-Webster help illustrate the
31 usage of the term “impartial” in various contexts.
32  Cambridge Dictionary: Cambridge Dictionary is another trusted source for
33 definitions and explanations of words in English. It offers insights into the meaning and
34 usage of terms like “impartial,” helping to clarify the concept for readers seeking
35 authoritative information.
36  Collins English Dictionary: Collins English Dictionary is a respected reference
37 source that provides comprehensive definitions and interpretations of words in the
38 English language. Its definition of “impartial” contributes to a deeper understanding of
39 the term’s significance in different contexts.
40 These sources were instrumental in providing accurate and reliable information on the
41 concept of impartiality for this response.
42 (image not reproduced)
43 Web Search Results
44 5 results
45
46 Impartial Definition & Meaning
47 https//www.merriam-webster.com › dictionary › impartial
48 Impartial Definition & Meaning
49 impartial stresses an absence of favor or prejudice. an impartial third party. unbiased
50 implies even more strongly an absence of all ...
51
Page 3
1 IMPARTIAL | definition in the Cambridge English Dictionary

2 https//dictionary.cambridge.org › us › dictionary › english › impartial
3 IMPARTIAL | definition in the Cambridge English Dictionary
4 able to judge or consider something fairly without allowing your own interest to influence
5 you: The jury has to give an impartial verdict after listening to all ...
6
7 IMPARTIAL Definition & Meaning
8 https//www.dictionary.com › browse › impartial
9 IMPARTIAL Definition & Meaning
10 Impartial definition: not partial or biased; fair; just. See examples of IMPARTIAL used in
11 a sentence.
12
13 What is meant by being impartial?
14 https//www.quora.com › What-is-meant-by-being-impartial
15 What is meant by being impartial?
16 Impartial means to be fair and just; not taking a side in a dispute. An impartial judge will
17 treat all rivals or disputants equally.
18
19 Impartial - Definition, Meaning & Synonyms
20 https//www.vocabulary.com › dictionary › impartial
21 Impartial - Definition, Meaning & Synonyms
22 adjective. free from undue bias or preconceived opinions. “the impartial eye of a scientist”.
23 synonyms: unprejudiced · color-blind, colour-blind, nonracist.
24 END QUOTE
25
26 Hansard 1-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
27 Australasian Convention),
28 QUOTE Mr. OCONNER (New South Wales).-
29 Because, as has been said before, it is [start page 357] necessary not only that the administration of
30 justice should be pure and above suspicion, but that it should be beyond the possibility of suspicion;
31 END QUOTE
32
33 Hansard 8-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
34 QUOTE
35 Sir JOHN DOWNER.-Now it is coming out. The Constitution is made for the people and
36 the states on terms that are just to both.
37 END QUOTE
38
39 Cockburn on 10-3-1891 stated “No parliament under a federation can be a constituent
40 body; it will cease to have the power of changing its constitution at its own will.” Did this
41 mean only Electors by way of referendum can approve any amendment to a constitution?
42 QUOTE
43 Cockburn on 10-3-1891 stated “No parliament under a federation can be a constituent
44 body; it will cease to have the power of changing its constitution at its own will.” Did this
45 mean only Electors by way of referendum can approve any amendment to a constitution?
46 https://iask.ai/?mode=question&options[detail_level]=detailed&q=Cockburn+on+10-3-
47 1891+stated+“No+parliament+under+a+federation+can+be+a+constituent+body%3B+it+
48 will+cease+to+have+the+power+of+changing+its+constitution+at+its+own+will.”+Did+t
49 his+mean+only+Electors+by+way+of+referendum+can+approve+any+amendment+to+a+
50 constitution%3F%0A
52 Answer:

Page 4
1 Yes, according to Cockburn’s statement on 10-3-1891, under a federation, no

2 parliament can unilaterally change the constitution. Instead, any amendment to the
3 constitution would require approval by the electors through a referendum. This
4 means that the power to amend the constitution rests with the people rather than
5 with the parliament alone.
6 In a federated system of government, such as in federal states like Australia or the United
7 States, the constitution is typically regarded as a fundamental law that outlines the structure
8 of government and allocates powers between different levels of government. Given this
9 foundational role of the constitution, it is often considered appropriate that any changes to
10 it should not be made lightly or unilaterally by the parliament.
11 Cockburn’s statement reflects a key principle of federalism - that constitutional
12 amendments should involve a broader process than simple parliamentary approval. By
13 requiring approval from the electors through a referendum, it ensures that changes to the
14 constitution have popular legitimacy and are not solely determined by political elites.
15 This approach also serves to safeguard against potential abuses of power by the parliament
16 and helps maintain the stability and integrity of the constitutional order. By involving the
17 people directly in constitutional amendments, it enhances democratic participation and
18 accountability in the governance process.
19 Therefore, Cockburn’s assertion implies that under a federation, parliamentary sovereignty
20 is limited concerning constitutional changes, and ultimate authority rests with the
21 electorate through mechanisms such as referendums.
22 In summary, Cockburn’s statement suggests that under a federation, only electors through
23 referendums can approve any amendment to a constitution, thereby emphasizing popular
24 sovereignty and democratic decision-making in matters of constitutional change.
25 Top 3 Authoritative Sources Used:
26 The Federalist Papers
27 Constitutional Law: Principles and Policies (Aspen Treatise)
28 Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
29 These sources were consulted to provide comprehensive information on federalism,
30 constitutional amendments, and democratic principles underlying Cockburn’s statement.
32 2 results
33
34 110530-Premier Ted Bailliue - COMPLAINT - Etc
35 https//www.scribd.com › document › 164448807 › 110530-Premier-Ted-Bailliue-
36 COMPLAINT-Etc
37 110530-Premier Ted Bailliue - COMPLAINT - Etc
38 COCKBURN: No parliament under a federation can be a constituent body; it will cease to
39 have the power of changing its constitution at its own will. END ...
40
41 130719-R Clark Attorney General & Others-Re COMPLAINT-Sheriff ...
42 https//www.scribd.com › document › 154693390 › 130719-R-Clark-Attorney-General-
43 Others-Re-COMPLAINT-Sheriff-CONTEMPT-of-COURT-Etc
44 130719-R Clark Attorney General & Others-Re COMPLAINT-Sheriff ...
45 COCKBURN: No parliament under a federation can be a constituent body; it will cease to
46 have the power of changing its constitution at its own will. END ...
47 END QUOTE
48
49 There are 2 purported versions of Constitution Act for the Colony/State of Victoria however in
50 my view neither one are as such valid constitutions. The 1855 (Colonial) Constitution Act for
51 Victoria was amended by the provisions of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act
Page 5
1 1900 (UK) and as such by right it should have been reprinted as: Victoria State Constitution Act
2 1855 as amended by the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK).
3
4
5
6 Therefore, the purported Victoria ‘Constitution Act 1975’ is not a valid constitution at all,
7 regardless having purportedly 120 amendments. It purports to be about 243 pages and the old
8 Colonial Constitution Act 1855 is about 39 pages.
9 WATSON v_ LEE (1979) 144 CLR 374;( JUDGE3 STEPHEN J.)
10 QUOTE
11 As Scott L.J. said in Blackpool Corporation v. Locker (1948) 1 KB 349, at p
12 361 , speaking there of sub-delegated legislation, "there is one quite general
13 question . . . of supreme importance to the continuance of the rule of law
14 under the British constitution, namely, the right of the public affected to
15 know what that law is". The maxim that ignorance of the law is no excuse forms the
16 "working hypothesis on which the rule of law rests in British democracy" but to
17 operate it requires that "the whole of our law, written or unwritten, is accessible to
18 the public - in the sense, of course, that at any rate its legal advisers have access to it at
19 any moment, as of right".
20 END QUOTE
21 Again;
22 QUOTE
23 it requires that "the whole of our law, written or unwritten, is
24 accessible to the public - in the sense, of course,
25 END QUOTE
26
27 Ordinary citizens cannot be expected to check all kinds of legislation being is constitutional and
28 other laws to try to discover what actually is or isn’t applicable. As the Framers of the
29 Constitution made clear legislation must be in “plain English”.
30 Therefore, one the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) was enacted then
31 the British Parliament ought to have also enacted an Amended Victorian 1855 Constitution Act
32 to signify the reduction of legislative powers as well as that the Colonial Courts when becoming
33 States no longer had “sovereign” powers to amend its own constitution as only State electors
34 could do so by way of State approved referendums. Instead we have ended up with a myriad of
35 legal provisions that even those with law decrees often are finding their views are deemed
36 incorrect and in the process their clients are losing their cases.
37 While I understand that in British law subsequent legislation automatically may nullify previous
38 legislation to extend there is a conflict, however as the Framers of the Constitution made clear:
39

Page 6
1 QUOTE Mr. CARRUTHERS:

2 This is a Constitution which the unlettered people of the community ought to be able to
3 understand.
4 END QUOTE
5 .
7 QUOTE
8 The Right Hon. C.C. KINGSTON (South Australia)[9.21]: I trust the Drafting Committee
9 will not fail to exercise a liberal discretion in striking out words which they do not
10 understand, and that they will put in words which can be understood by persons commonly
11 acquainted with the English language.
12 END QUOTE
13
15 QUOTE Mr. ISAACS.-
16 We want a people's Constitution, not a lawyers' Constitution.
17 END QUOTE
18
20 QUOTE Mr. SYMON (South Australia).-
21 That this is not like an Act of Parliament which we are passing. It is not in the position which Mr. Barton has
22 described, of choosing or setting up a code of laws to interpret the common law of England. This
23 Constitution we are framing is not yet passed. It has to be handed over not to a Convention similar to
24 this, not to a small select body of legislators, but to the whole body of the people for their acceptance or
25 rejection. It is the whole body of the people whose understanding you have to bring to bear upon it,
26 and it is the whole body of the people, the more or less instructed body of the people, who have to
27 understand clearly everything in the Constitution, which affects them for weal or woe during the whole
28 time of the existence of this Commonwealth. We cannot have on the platform, when this Constitution is
29 commended to the people, lawyers on both sides, drawing subtle distinctions, which may or may not be
30 appreciated by the people.
31 END QUOTE
32
33 It must be clear that Buloke Shire Council and its claimed Law Enforcement Officers themselves
34 do not have a clue what is constitutionally applicable and so simply ignore my writings ongoing.
35 This however cannot excuse their reign of tyranny upon me.
36
37 As I indicated I have no issue to pay fire levy in itself as I acknowledge the need for appropriate
38 support for firefighters but to put the levy on “land value” makes it unconstitutional as the State
39 of Victoria (so any other state) has no legislative powers as to land taxation, which the fire levy
40 really has become and Buloke Shire Council implies itself by including it in its purported “rates”
41 charges.
42
43 The same with the alleged “interest” of about 10% to be charged on alleged overdue charges.
44 Reality is that the State of Victoria no longer has a “State bank” and as such cannot legislate as if
45 it still has a “State Bank”.
46
47 Former Premier Peter Beattie purported to have Queensland going back to the Colonial
48 Queensland Constitution Act and then enact the 2001 Queensland Constitution Act 2001. This to
49 me was utter and sheer nonsense because legally the Queensland Colonial Constitution Act was
50 wiped out upon federation as it became the Amended Colonial State Constitution Act! As such,
51 you cannot revert to something that no longer existed.
52 Likewise, as I have set out above the Victoria Colonial Constitution Act 1855 was no more but
53 became the Amended Victoria Colonial State Constitution Act 1855 which by this
54 transformation altered the Colonial sovereign legislative powers to be State “constitutional”
55 legislative powers.
Page 7
1
2 It may be asked can the High Court of Australia then hand down any judgment to somehow
3 amend the true meaning and application of the constitution, which ever constitution it might be
4 of the Commonwealth and/or the States?
5
7 QUOTE Mr. BARTON.-
8 Providing, as this Constitution does, for a free people to elect a free Parliament-giving that
9 people through their Parliament the power of the purse-laying at their mercy from day to
10 day the existence of any Ministry which dares by corruption, or drifts through ignorance
11 into, the commission of any act which is unfavorable to the people having this security, it
12 must in its very essence be a free Constitution. Whatever any one may say to the contrary
13 that is secured in the very way in which the freedom of the British Constitution is secured.
14 It is secured by vesting in the people, through their representatives, the power of the purse,
15 and I venture [start page 2477] to say there is no other way of securing absolute freedom to
16 a people than that, unless you make a different kind of Executive than that which we
17 contemplate, and then overload your Constitution with legislative provisions to protect the
18 citizen from interference. Under this Constitution he is saved from every kind of
19 interference. Under this Constitution he has his voice not only in the, daily
20 government of the country, but in the daily determination of the question of whom is
21 the Government to consist. There is the guarantee of freedom in this Constitution.
22 There is the guarantee which none of us have sought to remove, but every one has
23 sought to strengthen. How we or our work can be accused of not providing for the
24 popular liberty is something which I hope the critics will now venture to explain, and
25 I think I have made their work difficult for them. Having provided in that way for a
26 free Constitution, we have provided for an Executive which is charged with the duty
27 of maintaining the provisions of that Constitution; and, therefore, it can only act as
28 the agents of the people. We have provided for a Judiciary, which will determine
29 questions arising under this Constitution, and with all other questions which should
30 be dealt with by a Federal Judiciary and it will also be a High Court of Appeal for all
31 courts in the states that choose to resort to it. In doing these things, have we not
32 provided, first, that our Constitution shall be free: next, that its government shall be by the
33 will of the people, which is the just result of their freedom: thirdly, that the Constitution
34 shall not, nor shall any of its provisions, be twisted or perverted, inasmuch as a court
35 appointed by their own Executive, but acting independently, is to decide what is a
36 perversion of its provisions? We can have every faith in the constitution of that tribunal. It
37 is appointed as the arbiter of the Constitution. It is appointed not to be above the
38 Constitution, for no citizen is above it, but under it; but it is appointed for the purpose
39 of saying that those who are the instruments of the Constitution-the Government and
40 the Parliament of the day-shall not become the masters of those whom, as to the
41 Constitution, they are bound to serve. What I mean is this: That if you, after making
42 a Constitution of this kind, enable any Government or any Parliament to twist or
43 infringe its provisions, then by slow degrees you may have that Constitution-if not
44 altered in terms-so whittled away in operation that the guarantees of freedom which it
45 gives your people will not be maintained; and so, in the highest sense, the court you
46 are creating here, which is to be the final interpreter of that Constitution, will be such
47 a tribunal as will preserve the popular liberty in all these regards, and will prevent,
48 under any pretext of constitutional action, the Commonwealth from dominating the
49 states, or the states from usurping the sphere of the Commonwealth. Having provided
50 for all these things, I think this Convention has done well.
51 END QUOTE
52
Page 8
1 It must be loud and clear that no court judgment can interfere with the true meaning and
2 application of the legal principles embedded in the constitution and hence it cannot validate any
3 purported amendments to any constitution not approve by the electors in a referendum.
4 And again:
5
6 HANSARD 9-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
7 Australasian Convention),
8 QUOTE
9 Mr. HIGGINS.-No, because the Constitution is not passed by the Parliament.
10 END QUOTE
11
12 On 19-4-1897 Mr. CARRUTHERS stated ‘This is a Constitution which the unlettered people
13 of the community ought to be able to understand.” What did he mean by this?
14 QUOTE
15 On 19-4-1897 Mr. CARRUTHERS stated ‘This is a Constitution which the unlettered people
16 of the community ought to be able to understand.” What did he mean by this?
17 https://iask.ai/?mode=question&options[detail_level]=detailed&q=On+19-4-
18 1897+Mr.+CARRUTHERS+stated+“This+is+a+Constitution+which+the+unlettered+peop
19 le+of+the+community+ought+to+be+able+to+understand.”+What+did+he+mean+by+this
20 %3F
21 AI Questions · AI Search Engine
23 Understanding Mr. Carruthers’ Statement
24 Mr. Carruthers’ statement on April 19, 1897, “This is a Constitution which the unlettered
25 people of the community ought to be able to understand,” can be interpreted in several
26 ways based on the context of the time and the broader principles of governance and
27 democracy.
28 Accessibility and Clarity: One interpretation could be that Mr. Carruthers was
29 emphasizing the importance of making the constitution easily understandable for all
30 members of society, including those who may not have formal education or literacy skills.
31 By using language and structures that are clear and straightforward, even individuals with
32 limited education would be able to comprehend their rights, duties, and the functioning of
33 their government as outlined in the constitution.
34 Empowerment of the Masses: Another possible meaning behind his statement is related
35 to empowering ordinary citizens by ensuring that they can grasp the content and
36 implications of the constitution. In a democratic society, where decisions are ideally made
37 collectively by informed citizens, it is crucial that everyone, regardless of their educational
38 background, can participate meaningfully in governance processes. By making the
39 constitution accessible to all, Mr. Carruthers might have been advocating for greater civic
40 engagement and understanding among the general population.
41 Transparency and Accountability: Additionally, Mr. Carruthers’ remark could reflect a
42 commitment to transparency and accountability in governance. A constitution that is easily
43 understood by everyone helps prevent ambiguity or misinterpretation of laws and
44 regulations. It promotes a system where both the government and its citizens are held
45 accountable for upholding the principles enshrined in the constitution since there is no
46 room for confusion or manipulation due to complex language or obscure provisions.
47 In essence, Mr. Carruthers’ statement likely underscored the significance of creating a
48 constitution that is not only legally sound but also inclusive, transparent, and
49 comprehensible to all members of society, irrespective of their educational background or
50 social status.
Page 9
1 Library of Congress: The Library of Congress houses an extensive collection of historical

2 documents, including speeches and statements from various time periods. It serves as a
3 reputable source for accessing primary materials related to significant events like Mr.
4 Carruthers’ statement in 1897.
5 National Archives: The National Archives preserves official records of government
6 actions and statements throughout history. It provides valuable insights into past
7 declarations, policies, and discussions that help contextualize statements such as Mr.
8 Carruthers’ regarding constitutional matters.
9 Academic Journals on Constitutional Law: Academic journals specializing in
10 constitutional law offer scholarly analyses and interpretations of historical events like
11 speeches related to constitutional principles. These sources provide expert opinions and
12 critical perspectives on the implications of statements made by public figures like Mr.
13 Carruthers in 1897.
14 By consulting these authoritative sources, a comprehensive understanding of Mr.
15 Carruthers’ statement can be achieved through historical context, legal analysis, and
16 scholarly interpretations within the realm of constitutional law research.
18 5 results
19
20 law - ChrisFieldBlog.com
21 https//chrisfieldblog.com › tags › law
22 law - ChrisFieldBlog.com
23 Mr. CARRUTHERS: This is a Constitution which the unlettered people of the community
24 ought to be able to understand. Hansard 22-2-1898 ...
25
26 Re Religious & associated issues 20170125-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka ...
27 https//www.aph.gov.au › DocumentStore.ashx
28 Re Religious & associated issues 20170125-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka ...
30 ought to be able to understand. END QUOTE. 10. Hansard 21 ...
31
32 April 2011 - ChrisFieldBlog.com
33 http//chrisfieldblog.com › 2011 › 04
34 April 2011 - ChrisFieldBlog.com
35 CARRUTHERS: This is a Constitution which the unlettered people of the community
36 ought to be able to understand. Hansard 22-2-1898 Constitution ...
37
38 20149301-G. H .Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To MR Tony Abbott PM
39 https//www.scribd.com › document › 209947922 › 20149301-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-
40 B-to-Mr-Tony-Abbott-PM-Re-Race
41 20149301-G. H .Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To MR Tony Abbott PM
42 Australasian Convention) QUOTE Mr. CARRUTHERS: This is a Constitution which the
43 unlettered people of the community ought to be able to understand. END QUOTE ...
44
45 Constitutionalist: Who We Are As A People-The Syrian Refugee ...
46 https//es.scribd.com › document › 329541942 › 20161101-PRESS-RELEASE-Mr-G-H-
47 Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-B-IsSUE-Religious-Doctirne-Issues-Aliens-Etc-the-Constitution
48 Constitutionalist: Who We Are As A People-The Syrian Refugee ...
50 ought to be able to understand. END QUOTE Hansard 21-9-1897 Constitution ...
51 END QUOTE
Page 10
1
2 On 20-4-1897 Mr. HIGGINS stated “ I
think it is advisable that private people should not be put
3 to the expense of having important questions of constitutional law decided out of their own
4 pockets.” what did he mean by that?
5 QUOTE
6 On 20-4-1897 Mr. HIGGINS stated “I think it is advisable that private people should not
7 be put to the expense of having important questions of constitutional law decided out of
8 their own pockets.” what did he mean by that?
9
10 https://iask.ai/?mode=question&options[detail_level]=detailed&q=On+20-4-
11 1897+Mr.+HIGGINS+stated+“I+think+it+is+advisable+that+private+people+should+not+
12 be+put+to+the+expense+of+having+important+questions+of+constitutional+law+decided
13 +out+of+their+own+pockets.”+what+did+he+mean+by+that%3F
14 iAsk AI
16 Answer:
17 Mr. Higgins’ statement on 20-4-1897 reflects his belief that important questions of
18 constitutional law should not burden private individuals with the financial costs
19 associated with resolving such matters. He likely meant that legal disputes involving
20 constitutional issues are of significant public interest and importance, and therefore,
21 the responsibility for addressing these matters should not fall solely on private
22 citizens who may lack the resources to bear the expenses involved in litigating such
23 complex legal issues. By suggesting that these questions should not be decided “out of
24 their own pockets,” Mr. Higgins may have been advocating for a system where the
25 state or government takes on the financial burden of resolving constitutional disputes
26 to ensure equal access to justice and protect the public interest. This statement
27 underscores the broader societal implications of constitutional law and highlights the
28 need for mechanisms to facilitate access to legal remedies without imposing undue
29 financial hardship on individuals.
30
32 Library of Congress: The Library of Congress is a reputable institution that provides
33 access to a wide range of historical documents, including speeches and statements made by
34 public figures like Mr. Higgins. It serves as a valuable resource for researching primary
35 sources related to historical events and figures.
36 Legal Journals: Legal journals are scholarly publications that offer in-depth analysis and
37 commentary on legal issues, including constitutional law. These sources provide expert
38 insights into legal concepts and interpretations, making them authoritative references for
39 understanding complex legal matters.
40 Historical Archives: Historical archives contain a wealth of primary source materials, such
41 as letters, speeches, and official records, which can shed light on the context and meaning
42 behind statements made by historical figures like Mr. Higgins. Accessing historical
43 archives ensures accuracy and reliability in interpreting historical events and statements.
44 By consulting these authoritative sources, a comprehensive understanding of Mr. Higgins’
45 statement and its significance in the context of constitutional law can be achieved.
47 2 results
48
49 Affidavit | PDF | Jurisdiction | Judge
50 https//www.scribd.com › document › 475546631 › 202009010-Affidavit
51 Affidavit | PDF | Jurisdiction | Judge
Page 11
1 I have just filed with the High Court of Australia a cover letter, an Order Nisi and an
2 Affidavit in the circumstances prevailing to seek the Court to hear ...
3
4 20140222-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To HM Queen Elizabeth II
5 https//www.scribd.com › document › 208524417 › 20140222-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-
6 B-to-HM-Queen-Elizabeth-II-Various-Issues
7 20140222-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To HM Queen Elizabeth II
8 It is my understanding as a self-educated CONSTITUTIONALIST that Her Majesty can
9 invoke prerogative powers to refer the matters stated in this document to the ...
10 END QUOTE
11
12 The above stated clearly questions the validity of the purported Victoria Constitution Act 1975
13 with its purported 120 amendments, as in fact likewise does so regarding other States who
14 purportedly amended their constitutions without approval by respective State referendum
15 approval.
16
17 Likewise, the States having purportedly legislated for State land taxation even so the
18 Commonwealth of Australia already had legislated on 11 November 1910 for this and as such
19 the States “concurrent” legislative powers was no more than the following needs also to be
20 considered:
21
22 Are you aware that Barry Collier MP Parliamentarian Secretary Assisting the Treasurer NSW on 2
23 March 2011 claimed (to me) that the States had legislative powers regarding land taxation
24 returned to them? Do you accept this is possible when the constitution doesn’t provide for this
25 mechanism to return exclusive Commonwealth power back to the States?
26
27 37-0114 (Asked the using same link, and yet answer is not exactly the same.)
28 QUOTE Are you aware that Barry Collier MP Parliamentarian Secretary Assisting the Treasurer NSW
29 https://iask.ai/?mode=question&options[detail_level]=detailed&q=Are+you+aware+that+
30 Barry+Collier+MP+Parliamentarian+Secretary+Assisting+the+Treasurer+NSW+on+2+M
31 arch+2011+claimed+%28to+me%29+that+the+States+had+legislative+powers+regarding
32 +land+taxation+returned+to+them%3F+Do+you+accept+this+is+possible+when+the+con
33 stitution+doesn%E2%80%99t+provide+for+this+mechanism+to+return+exclusive+Comm
34 onwealth+power+back+to+the+States%3F
35 Are you aware that Barry Collier MP Parliamentarian Secretary Assisting the
36 Treasurer NSW on 2 March 2011 claimed (to me) that the States had legislative
37 powers regarding land taxation returned to them? Do you accept this is possible when
38 the constitution doesn’t provide for this mechanism to return exclusive
39 Commonwealth power back to the States?
40
41 INSERT by G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
42 This response was provided upon the same question that was done on 25 March 2024
43 albeit as this response refer to the “20240327” date this underlines that when the same
44 question is asked days later there can be a different response. Meaning, that the questions I
45 at the time in pdf but then seek to do in word document and so go back to the same link, I
46 may have a different answer. Just to point out this is not a DOUBLE in error but rather to
47 show that an identical question by the same person my end up differently. How different
48 cannot be predicted.
49 END INSERT by G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
50

Page 12
1 Answer:
2 No, it is not possible for the States to have legislative powers regarding land taxation
3 returned to them if the Constitution does not provide for such a mechanism. The
4 Australian Constitution clearly outlines the division of powers between the
5 Commonwealth and the States, and taxation powers are predominantly held by the
6 Commonwealth government.
7 The power to levy taxes, including land taxation, is a fundamental aspect of
8 governance that falls under the exclusive domain of the Commonwealth government
9 as per Section 51(ii) of the Australian Constitution. This section grants the
10 Commonwealth Parliament the authority to make laws with respect to taxation,
11 which includes income tax but also extends to other forms of taxation.
12 While there are instances where certain powers can be delegated or shared between
13 the Commonwealth and the States through specific agreements or arrangements, any
14 return of exclusive Commonwealth power back to the States would require a
15 constitutional amendment. Without such an amendment, it is legally untenable for
16 the States to unilaterally claim legislative powers over areas that are constitutionally
17 assigned to the Commonwealth.
18 In summary, unless there has been a constitutional amendment or a specific legal
19 provision allowing for such a transfer of power regarding land taxation from the
20 Commonwealth back to the States, it is not feasible for Barry Collier MP or any State
21 entity to assert legislative authority in this matter.
23 1. Australian Constitution: The primary legal document that establishes the framework
24 for Australia’s federal system of government and delineates the distribution of
25 powers between the Commonwealth and State governments.
26 2. Taxation Laws: Relevant federal legislation and regulations governing taxation in
27 Australia, including provisions related to land taxation and other forms of levies.
28 3. Legal Commentaries on Constitutional Law: Scholarly works and expert analyses on
29 constitutional law in Australia that provide insights into issues related to federalism,
30 division of powers, and constitutional amendments.
32 5 results
33
34 Mr Barry Joseph COLLIER, OAM, BComm, DipEd, DipLaw, GAICD ( ...
35 https//www.parliament.nsw.gov.au › members › Pages › member-details.aspx
36 Mr Barry Joseph COLLIER, OAM, BComm, DipEd, DipLaw, GAICD ( ...
37 Member of the NSW Legislative Assembly, 19 Oct 2013, 06 Mar 2015 ; Parliamentary
38 Secretary Assisting the Attorney General, Assisting the Treasurer and Assisting ...
39
40 20240327-Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Buloke Shire Council & Ors
41 https//www.scribd.com › document › 717556566 › 20240327-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-B-to-
42 Buloke-Shire-Council-Ors
43 20240327-Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Buloke Shire Council & Ors
44 36 Assisting the Treasurer NSW on 2 March 2011 claimed 37 38 As Barry Collier MP
45 Parliamentarian Secretary Assisting the Treasurer NSW on 2 March 2011 39 ...
46
47 Barry Collier (politician)
48 https//en.m.wikipedia.org › wiki › Barry_Collier_(politician)
49 Barry Collier (politician)
50 He was a Labor Party member of the New South Wales Legislative Assembly from 1999
51 to 2011 and from 2013 to 2015, representing the electorate of Miranda.
52
Page 13
1 Department of the Legislative Assembly - Parliament of NSW

2 https//www.parliament.nsw.gov.au › la › department › Documents › department-of-the-
3 legislative-assembly-annual-report-for-2009-2010 ›
4 LA%20Annual%20Report%20200910.pdf
5 Department of the Legislative Assembly - Parliament of NSW
6 parliamentary recess between december 2010 and the march 2011 election should provide
7 staffing resources to complete some of these projects.
8
9 Committee Secretary 5-6-2011 Joint ...
10 https//www.aph.gov.au › parliamentary_business › committees ›
11 house_of_representatives_committees
12 END QUOTE
13
14 As the High Court of Australia in The Municipal of Sydney v Commonwealth 1904 made clear
15 that a council (corporation) could not legislate for taxation but the State could legislate for the
16 council. However that was in 1904 and as on 11 November 1910 then the Commonwealth
17 commenced to legislate regarding ‘land taxation” then the States no longer had this “concurrent”
18 legislative powers. (As was with income taxation).
19
21 QUOTE Mr. DEAKIN (Victoria).-
22 The record of these debates may fairly be expected to be widely read, and the observations to which I
23 allude might otherwise lead to a certain amount of misconception.
24 END QUOTE
25
27 QUOTE
28 Mr. BARTON.-I was going to explain when I was interrupted that the moment the
29 Commonwealth legislates on this subject the power will become exclusive.
30 END QUOTE
31
33 QUOTE
34 Mr. BARTON (New South Wales).-If this is left as an exclusive power the laws of the
35 states will nevertheless remain in force under clause 100.
36 Mr. TRENWITH.-Would the states still proceed to make laws?
37 Mr. BARTON.-Not after this power of legislation comes into force. Their existing laws
38 will, however, remain. If this is exclusive they can make no new laws, but the necessity of
39 making these new laws will be all the more forced on the Commonwealth.
40 END QUOTE
41
43 QUOTE Mr. HOWE.-
44 My only desire is to give power to the Federal Parliament to achieve a scheme for old-age
45 pensions if it be practicable, and if the people require it. No power would be taken away
46 from the states. The sub-section would not interfere with the right of any state to act in the
47 meantime until the Federal Parliament took the matter in hand.
48 END QUOTE
49
50 No matter the decades I have sought attention to these constitutional issues nothing was done to
51 try to resolve matters. Now Buloke Shire Council continue the same rot despite my past
52 extensive writings and well it leaves me no alternative but to so to say stand my ground.
53

Page 14
1 As purported “council rates” were held by the High Court of Australia in 1904 to be “delegated”
2 State ‘land taxation’ legislative powers, and those legislative powers came to an end on 11
3 November 1910 then the States such as Victoria in about 1926 commencing nevertheless to
4 legislate for land taxation cannot be accepted as valid.
5
6 I received a purported “Penalty Reminder Notice” dated 08/04/2024 for $1,923.00 + cost $26.60
7 Amount due S1,949.60 Infringement number 3212 Due date 06/05/2024.
8
9 It also states: “ If you ignore this courtesy letter, a Notice of Enforcement Order will be
10 issued against you by the court.”
11
12 What Buloke Shire Council now makes clear that it decided to issue a fine + cost against me
13 rather than a competent court of administration of justice.
14
15 It then makes clear that a court will “Notice of Enforcement Order will be issued against you
16 by the court.”. Meaning the court has to do as it is told by Buloke Shire Council,. “Separation of
17 power” is no more!
18
19 I also received an 8 April 2024 correspondence from Buloke Shire Council which also stated:
20
21 “Further to previous correspondence requesting payment of outstanding rates on the above
22 property and in accordance with Council policy, this matter will be directed to external
23 debtor collection unless an arrangement can be made prior to 22 April 2024.”
24
25 And
26
27 “Unless a payment plan is in place by 22 April 2024, your account will be referred to
28 Council’s debt collection agency. External debt collection may result in substantial legal
29 cost being incurred and payable.”
30
31 And
32
33 “Penelope Grant
34 Revenue Officer”
35
36 There can be absolutely no doubt that I wrote considerably about the legal issues concerned.
37 Buloke Shire Council by its silence to appropriate (as I view it) respond seems to have taken the
38 position it can ignore any reasonable communication seeking to resolve issues as it has the
39 (purported) power and it dictates the court what to do.
40
41 I urge you to withdraw these utter and sheer nonsense of a notices.
42
43 Let us take the fire levy. It is not and cannot be part of “rates” because it would be to pay
44 towards the County Fire Authority and not that Buloke Shire Council can use it for whatever it
45 desires. Yet, Buloke shire Council fails to simply provide me with an account for the fire levy in
46 its own rights so I can pay it. We have ample of firefighters in small country towns who at times
47 place their health, wellbeing and even their lives on the line and I view it is appropriate to pay
48 for their services to seek to ensure that their equipment, their loss of income while firefighting,
49 etc, is adequately provided for.
50 It would be absurd to claim that Buloke Shire Council cares about the health, wellbeing and the
51 lives of firefighters because despite of the “Safe Drinking Water Act” that was passed through
Page 15
1 the Parliament in 2003 to my understanding in 2024 towns like Berriwillock still has no “safe
2 drinking water”! Meaning, firefighters are risking their health and wellbeing to be forced to rely
3 upon poisonous “untreated water”. Actually their family members may also become affected.
4
5 Hansard 7-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National Australasian
6 Convention)
7 QUOTE Mr. BARTON (New South Wales).-
8 I do not think the word quarantine, for instance, which is used in the sub-section of the 52nd
9 clause, is intended to give the Commonwealth power to legislate with regard to any
10 quarantine. That simply applies to quarantine as referring to diseases among man-kind.
11 END QUOTE
12
13 Yet, I understand that councils have health centres injecting children with so called infant and
14 childhood vaccines regardless many are unconstitutional for the States to have them injected, as
15 well as parents (as I experienced) are left in the dark as to the dangers associated regarding
16 injections and as such never could have given “informed consent”. The extensive “covid scam”
17 is but a clear example that councillors are so to say going along with whatever ignoring the
18 health and wellbeing of residents in that regard.
19
20 The following does refer mainly to the US of A forces but to get some idea I quote the following:
21
22 What do you view constitutes a “Law Enforcement Agency”?
23 QUOTE
24 What do you view constitutes a “Law Enforcement Agency”?
25
26 https://iask.ai/?mode=question&options[detail_level]=detailed&q=What+do+you+view+c
27 onstitutes+a+“Law+Enforcement+Agency”%3F
28 iAsk AI
29 Select the response detail level
30 RESULT LENGTH
31 Bottom of Form
32 FILTER SEARCH
34 Definition of a Law Enforcement Agency:
35 A Law Enforcement Agency (LEA) is any government agency responsible for law
36 enforcement within a specific jurisdiction through the employment and deployment of law
37 enforcement officers and their resources. These agencies are tasked with enforcing laws,
38 maintaining public order, and ensuring public safety. LEAs typically have various powers
39 and legal rights, such as the power of arrest and the use of force, to carry out their duties
40 effectively.
41 Characteristics of a Law Enforcement Agency:
42 Jurisdiction: LEAs operate within a defined jurisdiction, which can be at various levels
43 such as federal, state, county, municipality, or special jurisdictions like tribal or transit
44 areas. The jurisdiction determines where the LEA can apply its powers and enforce laws.
45 Powers and Authorities: LEAs are granted specific powers that allow them to investigate
46 crimes, apprehend suspects, conduct searches and seizures, and maintain public order.
47 These powers may vary from country to country based on legal frameworks and societal
48 norms.
49 Operational Areas: LEAs often divide their jurisdiction into operational areas for
50 administrative efficiency. These areas are sometimes referred to as commands or divisions
51 and help in organizing law enforcement activities effectively.

Page 16
1 Responsibilities: The primary responsibilities of a law enforcement agency include crime

2 prevention, investigation of criminal activities, apprehension of suspects, maintaining
3 public order, responding to emergencies, and upholding the rule of law within their
4 jurisdiction.
5 Collaboration: LEAs may collaborate with other agencies at different levels of government
6 or with international organizations to address complex crimes or situations that transcend
7 local boundaries.
8 In essence, a Law Enforcement Agency is an entity empowered by the government to
9 enforce laws, protect citizens, prevent crime, and maintain order within a specified
10 jurisdiction through the deployment of law enforcement officers and resources.
11 Top 3 Authoritative Sources Used in Answering this Question:
12 Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS): BJS maintains national data collections covering
13 federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies. It provides valuable insights into
14 personnel, equipment, operations, budgets, and job functions across various law
15 enforcement entities.
16 Legal Information Institute (LII): LII offers comprehensive legal resources that define the
17 roles and responsibilities of law enforcement agencies within the context of legal
18 frameworks in different jurisdictions.
19 International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP): IACP is a professional organization
20 that sets standards for law enforcement agencies worldwide. Their guidelines and best
21 practices contribute to defining the characteristics and functions of effective LEAs
22 globally.
24 5 results
25
26 Law enforcement agency
27 https//en.m.wikipedia.org › wiki › Law_enforcement_agency
28 Law enforcement agency
29 A law enforcement agency (LEA) is any government agency responsible for law
30 enforcement within a specific jurisdiction through the employment and deployment ...
31
32 Types of Law Enforcement Agencies
33 https//www.discoverpolicing.org › explore-the-field › types-of-law-enforcement-agencies
34 Types of Law Enforcement Agencies
35 While not a type of law enforcement agency, one designation to look for when evaluating
36 departments is CALEA Accreditation. CALEA, which stands for the ...
37
38 Law Enforcement - Bureau of Justice Statistics
39 https//bjs.ojp.gov › topics › law-enforcement
40 Law Enforcement - Bureau of Justice Statistics
41 The most recent tool to access incident-based data on crimes recorded by law enforcement
42 is the Law Enforcement Agency Reported Crime Analysis ...
43
44 Law Enforcement Agency - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
45 https//www.sciencedirect.com › topics › computer-science › law-enforcement-agency
46 Law Enforcement Agency - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
47 An anticorruption agency is a specialized law enforcement agency that fights political
48 corruption and other corruption activities. From: Investigations and the ...
49
50 State Law Enforcement | Definition, Functions & Types - Lesson

Page 17
1 https//study.com › academy › lesson › state-law-enforcement-agencies-roles-models.html

2 State Law Enforcement | Definition, Functions & Types - Lesson
3 When a state has only one state law enforcement agency, it is called the centralized model
4 of state law enforcement, whereas when a state has two or more ...
5 END QUOTE
6
7 Do you agree that a person to be a “law Enforcement Officer” should be provided with
8 appropriate training before commencing to act as a “Law Enforcement Officer”.
9 QUOTE
10 Do you agree that a person to be a “law Enforcement Officer” should be provided with
11 appropriate training before commencing to act as a “Law Enforcement Officer”.
12
13 https://iask.ai/?mode=question&options[detail_level]=detailed&q=Do+you+agree+that+a+person+to+be+a+
14 “law+Enforcement+Officer”+should+be+provided+with+appropriate+training+before+commencing+to+act
15 +as+a+“Law+Enforcement+Officer ”.
17 Training for Law Enforcement Officers
18 Law enforcement officers play a crucial role in maintaining public safety and upholding
19 the law. To effectively carry out their duties, it is widely recognized that individuals
20 aspiring to become law enforcement officers should undergo appropriate training before
21 assuming their roles.
22 Importance of Training
23 Training for law enforcement officers is essential for several reasons:
24 Skill Development: Proper training equips officers with the necessary skills to perform
25 their duties effectively. This includes knowledge of laws, investigative techniques, conflict
26 resolution, and use of force protocols.
27 Ethical Standards: Training helps instill ethical standards and professionalism in officers,
28 emphasizing the importance of upholding the law while respecting individual rights and
29 diversity.
30 Community Relations: Training programs often include components on community
31 policing and building positive relationships with the communities they serve. This fosters
32 trust and cooperation between law enforcement and the public.
33 Safety: Comprehensive training enhances officer safety by teaching them how to assess
34 risks, de-escalate situations, and respond appropriately to various scenarios they may
35 encounter in the line of duty.
36 Legal Knowledge: Understanding legal procedures and regulations is crucial for law
37 enforcement officers to ensure that their actions are lawful and adhere to due process.
38 Types of Training
39 Training for law enforcement officers typically covers a wide range of topics, including:
40 Academic Instruction: This includes classroom-based learning on subjects such as criminal
41 law, constitutional rights, report writing, and cultural sensitivity.
42 Practical Skills Training: Hands-on training in areas like firearms proficiency, defensive
43 tactics, emergency response, and vehicle operation is essential for developing practical
44 skills.
45 Scenario-Based Training: Simulated scenarios allow officers to apply their knowledge and
46 skills in realistic situations, helping them prepare for real-life encounters.
47 Continuing Education: Ongoing training is vital to keep officers updated on new laws,
48 technologies, and best practices in law enforcement.
49 Regulations and Standards

Page 18
1 Many jurisdictions have specific regulations mandating the minimum requirements for law
2 enforcement training programs. These standards ensure that officers receive adequate
3 preparation before assuming their roles as guardians of public safety.
4 In conclusion, providing appropriate training for individuals before they begin working as
5 law enforcement officers is crucial for ensuring professionalism, competence, ethical
6 conduct, community trust, officer safety, and adherence to legal standards.
8 National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
9 Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers (FLETC)
10 International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP)
11 The National Institute of Justice (NIJ), Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers
12 (FLETC), and International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP) are renowned
13 organizations that set standards for law enforcement training programs and provide
14 valuable resources for enhancing officer preparedness and effectiveness.
16 5 results
17
18 Can I start to work as a police officer while I'm at the police academy or do ...
19 https//www.quora.com › Can-I-start-to-work-as-a-police-officer-while-Im-at-the-police-
20 academy-or-do-I-need-to-finish-the-academy-first-to-start-working
21 Can I start to work as a police officer while I'm at the police academy or do ...
22 If you're serious about becoming a law enforcement officer, enroll in a two- or four-year
23 college and get a degree. What field you choose is ...
24
25 Should police officer be required to have college degrees?
26 https//www.police1.com › police-jobs-and-careers › articles › state-your-case-should-
27 prospective-cops-be-required-to-have-college-degrees-t9MXaJOawkPBvUma
28 Should police officer be required to have college degrees?
29 I believe any state certification training required for any law enforcement officer should
30 provide “in-house” credits recognized by colleges ...
31
32 the board on law enforcement officer standards and training (bleost) ...
33 https//sos.ms.gov › ACProposed › 00021289b.pdf
34 the board on law enforcement officer standards and training (bleost) ...
35 Board - Shall mean the Board on Law Enforcement Officer Standards and Training. 3.
36 Board Director - Shall mean the Director of the Division of Public Safety ...
37
38 How to Become a Police Officer: Your Step-by-Step Guide
39 https//www.rasmussen.edu › degrees › justice-studies › blog › how-to-become-a-police-
40 officer
41 How to Become a Police Officer: Your Step-by-Step Guide
42 Not passing this background investigation will stop the process of becoming a law
43 enforcement officer. ... Your education and training will ...
44
45 Training | Bureau of Justice Assistance
46 https//bja.ojp.gov › program › pmhc › training
47 Training | Bureau of Justice Assistance
48 The State of Washington mandates that every new full-time law enforcement officer
49 employed after July 1, 9 2017, complete eight hours of CIT training; In ...
50 END QUOTE
51

Page 19
1 This document sets out limitations by those considering themselves “Law Enforcement Officer”
2 that they are NOT above the law and when facing a property that is closed they cannot enter
3 without a WARRANT. While the following document was regarding Banyule City Council the
4 same applies to any council where its staff enters a property without the consent of the property
5 owner/tenant.
6
7 It is very important that citizens do not cave into the terrorism of any council. Hold
8 them legally accountable. Perhaps this document may provide an insight how to do so.
9 You can download the document from:
10 https://www.scribd.com/document/682156215/20231104-Mr-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-B-
11 to-Lawyers-Molly-Metcalf-Becklegal-Supplement-2
12
13 Mr Wayne Wall gave me the understanding that he can enter any property as he desires. I
14 disputed this and took the position he had been trespassing onto my property. In proceedings
15 before Carmody, Buloke Shire Council Counsel then produced GPS chart and asked Mr Wayne
16 Wall (witness for Bauloke Shire Council) in Examination-in-Chief if the photos were made from
17 the positions shown on the GPS chart, and I understood he confirmed this. It was to undermine
18 my claim he had been trespassing. After Counsel completed his examination in chief of Mr
19 Wayne Wall Carmody J then invited me to cross-examine but I indicated I preferred to do so
20 after the second witness had been giving evidence-in-chief, however Carmody J refused this. I
21 then stated to Mr Wayne Wall (while he was in the witness box) “I put it to you that you are not
22 telling the truth, are you?” It was then that Carmody J asked if I was accusing the witness of
23 lying upon which I responded that the witness himself could answer this. Mr Wayne Wall
24 insisted he was telling the truth. I then showed him 2 photos he had previously given evidence
25 about that they were of my property but after I explained the differences between the two houses
26 on the photos he admitted that they were not the same and he didn’t know where the other house
27 was. Carmody J then commented that the photo had no GSP marking. Actually, during cross
28 examination Mr Wayne Wall didn’t even know that he was talking about the backdoor and
29 referred to it as the front door. When the second witness was sworn in he then immediately
30 commented as I recall it “I agree with everything Mr Wayne Wall stated”. To me this appeared
31 to be “conspiracy” as the second witness had no way to know how Mr Wayne Wall had changed
32 his evidence.
33
34 It should not be ignored that there was an appeal before Carmody J and the lawyers for Buloke
35 Shire Council already had as I understand it used the same in Magistrates Court proceedings.
36 Worse was that I had filed with the magistrates Court an OBJECTION TO JURISDICTION
37 which however the court ignored. And when I did the same with Carmody J he simply responded
38 that filing the appeal gave jurisdiction.
39 That was completely incorrect, this as In 1988 I appeared in the Supreme Court of Victoria
40 against the State of Victoria for having falsely arrested my 2 year old daughter (as determined by
41 the Supreme Court of Victoria – who ordered her to be returned to me) and then Counsel for the
42 State of Victoria merely stated “OBJECTION TO JURISDICTION” and the trial judge then
43 explained I had to prove jurisdiction as the objector doesn’t have to disprove jurisdiction!
44
45 Despite of years writing to Buloke Shire Council I understand that while Buloke Shire Council
46 claims to be a “Law Enforcement Agency” it simply disregarded to pursue what is best for
47 firefighters, their families and others!
48 Also visitors to the area unaware that the taps only provide “untreated water” may then become
49 ill and yet not know what caused it. And in particular students on a bus outing could be very
50 vulnerable.

Page 20
1 And the care and concern by Buloke Shire Council is that much that in my view it unduly places
2 the health, wellbeing and even the lives of firefighters and others at risk.
3 After all, as was proven in court before Carmody J that Mr Wayne Wall admitted that the growth
4 around the property of the silos, which is opposite of my property, was a fire danger.
5 As I recall it his evidence was he never followed through with VicRoads as to the fire danger
6 along the highway!
7 When I questioned as to the amount of fire levy being charge I did get a response that I was not
8 living on the property. Bingo, Buloke Shire Council clearly was well aware and admitted to
9 know that I do not reside on the property. Actually about 10 years ago Mr Wayne Wall visited
10 the property and we then had a discussion and he was well aware I was not residing on the
11 property.
12
13 https://lyonslaw.com.au/what-is-exculpatory-evidence-at-law/
14 What Is Exculpatory Evidence at Law? | Lyons Law Group
15 Exculpatory evidence, in its essence, refers to any evidence that tends to show the innocence of an accused
16 individual or casts doubt upon their guilt. This ...
17 QUOTE
18 What Is Exculpatory Evidence at Law?
19
20 In the realm of criminal justice, the pursuit of truth and justice stands as a paramount
21 objective. This pursuit is deeply intertwined with the concept of exculpatory evidence,
22 which plays a pivotal role in ensuring that individuals receive fair trials and just outcomes.
23 Exculpatory evidence, often referred to as the “evidence that exonerates,” holds the
24 power to shift the trajectory of a legal case, potentially leading to the acquittal of an
25 accused person.
26 END QUOTE
27
28 Then obviously the issue is if I do not reside on the property then who is or causes the wheat to
29 grow on my property violating my “FEE SIMPLE” rights? Well, so far I know Buloke Shire
30 Council owns the property that contains the silos. Hence, the property owner should have been
31 directed to put up a fence to try to avoid grain to blow from its property onto my property. And
32 failing this even modest protection then the property owner is the real culprit who causes the
33 wheat to grow, etc. In effect I am entitled to a compensation for all the decades my “FEE
34 SIMPLE” rights were in that regard denied and caused undue stress and other harm including
35 financial harm upon me. Buloke Shire Council by this knowingly and/or ought to have known
36 deliberately conducted a conduct of terrorism upon me. Yet during litigation between Buloke
37 Shire Council and myself at no time did Buloke Shire Council lawyers reveal this “exculpatory
38 evidence” to the courts!
39
40 Foster (1950) S.R. (N.S.W.) 149, at p151 (Lord Denning, speaking on the role of an advocate)
41 QUOTE
42 As an advocate he is a minister of Justice equally with a judge, A Barrister cannot
43 pick or choose his clients...He must accept the brief and do all he honourably can on
44 behalf of his client. I say 'All he honourably can' because his duty is not only to his
45 client. He has a duty to the court which is paramount. It is a mistake to suppose that
46 he is a mouthpiece of his client to say what he wants: or his tool to do what he
47 directs. He is none of those things. He owes his allegiance to a higher cause. It is the
48 cause of truth and Justice. He must not consciously misstate the facts. He must not
49 knowingly conceal the truth. He must not unjustly make a charge of fraud, that is,
50 without evidence to support it. He must produce all relevant authorities, even those
51 that are against him. He must see that his client discloses, if ordered, all relevant

Page 21
1 documents, even those that are fatal to his case. He must disregard the specific
2 instructions of his client, if they conflict with his duty to the court.
3 END QUOTE
4
5 Buloke Shire Council as the prosecutor with its lawyers and witnesses in my view committed
6 serious offences such as violating court orders, concealing relevant evidence, conspiring to
7 pervert the administration of justice, filing false and misleading evidence, perjury, etc.
8 While lawyers may pursue to succeed for their client they must always do so in a honourable
9 manner as OFFICERS OF THE COURT however to the contrary concealing exculpatory
10 evidence underlines that lawyers were more interested to succeed at all cost for their client
11 rather than to act honourably as OFFICERS OF THE COURT.
12 How on earth could the lawyers never have noticed that they referred to photographic evidence
13 of 2 different houses purporting to be one and the same house? This may underline that in my
14 view their professional conduct was in question. Carmody J however rather than to make clear
15 he didn’t accept this kind of conduct in litigation before him rather seemed to me to go along by
16 even refusing to hold a jurisdictional hearing, despite my OBJECTION TO JURISDICTION. As
17 such Carmody J never invoked jurisdiction. As the Supreme Court of Victoria long before that
18 made clear when a party makes an OBJECTION TO JURISDICTION then it is for the other
19 party to provide evidence the court can invoke jurisdiction and not for the court itself to argue
20 the case.
21 While a party seeking to appeal is required by this to acknowledge the appelated court to invoke
22 jurisdiction, this in itself is not sufficient for a court to unilaterally declare jurisdiction. For
23 example a party may have filed an appeal out of time and then the opposing party may lodge an
24 OBJECTION TO JURISDICTION and the Court then is faced that it cannot deal with the appeal
25 itself until the OBJECTION TO JURISDICTION has been defeated.
26
27 Issues such as extensively canvassed in
28
29 This document sets out why no parliamentarian, judge, etc, is validly appointed. It relies
30 upon my past successful cases also. Worth reading for anyone faced with litigation!
31 https://www.scribd.com/document/722840485/20240414-Mr-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-B-Re-Written-
32 Submission-ADDRESS-TO-THE-COURT
33
34 also are relevant in that regard.
35 As the High Court of Australia in Re Wakim stated:
36
37 Re Wakim; Ex parte McNally; Re Wakim; Ex parte Darvall; Re Brown; Ex parte Amann; Spi [1999] HCA
38 27 (17 June 1999)
39 QUOTE
40 For constitutional purposes, they are a nullity. No doctrine of res judicata or issue
41 estoppel can prevail against the Constitution. Mr Gould is entitled to disregard the
42 orders made in Gould v Brown. No doubt, as Latham CJ said of invalid legislation, "he
43 will feel safer if he has a decision of a court in his favour". That is because those relying
44 on the earlier decision may seek to enforce it against Mr Gould.
45 END QUOTE
46
47 Therefore a court order without jurisdiction (being it in violation of the constitution, etc) cannot
48 be enforced but may be to try to clarify matters.
49
50 What we now seem to have is that some council, in this case Buloke Shire Council, takes it upon
51 itself that it seeks to use terrorism to enforce its own pretended powers without involvement of
52 any courts as to alleged fines, etc, as if it is above the rule of law and so the constitution.
Page 22
1
2 I understand that in the case of MORIATY v LONDON, CHATMAM & DOVER RY Queen’s
3 Bench 1870 L.R. 5 Q.B. 314;39 L.T.Q.B. 109;22 L.T. 163;34 J.P. 692;18 W.R. 625 in which the
4 plaintiff sued a railway company for personal injuries sustained and this plaintiff has gone about
5 suborning false evidence and it was held by the Court that even so the plaintiff would have had a
6 genuine and justify to case to sue normally, by the plaintiff conduct to suborn false evidence
7 this was seen by the Court that this conduct amounted to an admission that he had no case.
8
9
10 “FEE SIMPLE” rights were way back, more than 100 years ago held to provide the following
11 rights:
12
13 https://constitutionwatch.com.au/fee-simple/
14 Fee Simple. - Constitution Watch
15 12 July 2022 ... What is an Estate in Fee Simple? Commonwealth v New South
16 Wales [1923] HCA 34 (1923) 33 CLR 1. (9 August 1923) .
17
18 There is an excellent article at https://constitutionwatch.com.au/fee-simple/ which also refers to
19 Commonwealth v New South Wales [1923] HCA 34; 919230 33 CLR 1 (9August 1923)
20 QUOTE
21 Fee Simple.
22 Posted onMay 10, 2022AuthorEditor
23 What is an Estate in Fee Simple?
24
25 Commonwealth v New South Wales [1923] HCA 34 (1923) 33 CLR 1
26 (9 August 1923)
27 HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
28 KNOX C.J., ISAACS, HIGGINS, GAVAN DUFFY AND STARKE JJ.
29 THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA PLAINTIFF
30 AGAINST
31 THE STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES AND ANOTHER DEFENDANTS
32 1920-1923: SYDNEY, Dec. 1-3, 1920; Mar. 21-29, 1922; Aug. 9, 1923 33 CLR 1
33 Extracts from Commonwealth Law Reports Volume 33 / 33 CLR 1:-
34 (1920) 33 CLR 1 at 42
35
36 ISAACS J. In Challis's Real Property, 3rd ed., p. 218,
37 it is stated with perfect accuracy:—
38 “In the language of the English law, the word fee signifies an estate of inheritance as distinguished
39 from a less estate; not, as in the language of the feudists, a subject of tenure as distinguished from
40 an allodium.”
41 “Allodium being wholly unknown to English law, the latter distinction would in fact have no
42 meaning.” “A fee simple is the most extensive in quantum, and the most absolute in respect to the
43 rights which it confers, of all estates known to the law.”
44 “It confers, and since the beginning of legal history it always has conferred, the lawful right to
45 exercise over, upon, and in respect to, the land, every act of ownership which can enter into
46 the imagination, including the right to commit unlimited waste; and, for all practical
47 purposes of ownership, it differs from the absolute dominion of a chattel,
48 in nothing except the physical indestructibility of its subject.”
49 “Besides these rights of ownership, a fee simple at the present day confers an absolute
50 right, both of alienation inter vivos and of devise by will.” 2
51 Extracts from Commonwealth Law Reports Volume 33 / 33 CLR 1:-
52 (1920) 33 CLR 1 at 45

Page 23
1
2
3 And the Court did NOT provide any different application pending upon the race of a property
4 owner!
5
6 Now, let’s for argument sake I invite a music band to trail in one of the sheds and the noise is so
7 overwhelming that neighbours are denied their peace and tranquillity. While I have my FEE
8 SIMPLE rights so have my neighbours and their concern would not be if I have a music band
9 playing music on my property as long as they do it without disturbing the rights of my
10 neighbours. As such, I could make the shed sound proof and well my neighbours would not be
11 disturbed and denied their FEE SIMPLE rights and I can have the music band playing as long as
12 they like. Now consider the same logic with the grain silo property owner. What this property
13 owner does is the right of the property owner as long as it is not to deny me my FEE SIMPLE
14 rights. And that is what has been going on for decades. Wayne Wall, who during cross
15 examination (by me) admitted he came from South Australia and was not trained by Buloke
16 Shire Council in the job somehow then is pestering me for more than a decades when he should
17 in real terms have taken it up with the property owner with the silo’s to perhaps build a high
18 fence to prevent seeds to blow onto my property. And where nevertheless grai9n still finish up
19 on my property the property owner with the silos will with my arrangement perform such work
20 as to clear my property of any contamination.
21 After all, where I do not reside on the property and never planted any seeds to grow wheat then
22 surely I cannot be held liable for what my neighbour causes in violation of my rights.
23
24 As I wrote about in the past, see my publications at https://www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati, The
25 purported Australia Act never could in any shape or form prevent/deny the British Parliament to
26 legislate as to the Commonwealth of Australia. Ss51(xxxviii) was only to permit the
27 Commonwealth to legislate as to matters to which the British Parliament had additional
28 legislative powers to what 128 sections that are in part 9 of the constitution. Ss51(xxxviii) never
29 can be used to purportedly alter the first 8 clauses of the Commonwealth of Australia
30 Constitution Act 1900 (UK) which includes issues regarding the Monarchy. Yet, I understand
31 that when it comes to Aboriginals the State of Victoria has a total different kind of conduct, in
32 my view unconstitutional conduct, as set out in my documentation referred to above. One cannot
33 have that Aboriginals have a much higher level of property rights than those who hold “FEE
34 SIMPLE” rights and yet this is what the State of Victoria (and I understand others states and
35 even the Commonwealth) are pretending. To my knowledge there never was any referendum
36 approving Aboriginals to have more rights that other Australian property owners.
37 I do understand there were 2 failed referendums (1974 and 1988) that declined to accept councils
38 to be a form of “local government”. Constitutionally the “State government” is the “local
39 government” and the “Commonwealth government” is the “Central government” as I extensively
40 canvassed at my Scribd blog. The State Parliament/State government cannot create an additional
41 “local government” that would violate the legal system provided for in the Commonwealth of
42 Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK). The notion that the State can somehow decide for itself
43 how it deals with internal matters as a politic body in itself is not in all circumstances correct. A
44 State can only manage its internal affairs as long as it doesn’t violate the legal principles
45 embedded in the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK)! The “covid scam”
46 was a clear example where it went totally wrong.
47 My wife’s hairdresser named Lolita gave me the clear understanding that she did not intent to
48 have the (purported) covid-19 vaccination. Months later she gave me the understanding that
49 health officials had attended to her business address and made clear if she did not provide a
50 certificate of vaccination they would close down her hairdressing business, and as she had just
51 signed a 3 year lease agreement and fitted out the hairdressing salon she was left no alternative
Page 24
1 but to be purportedly) vaccinated, which really was a “gene therapy” DEPOPULATION

2 “bioweapon” jab. I understood this to be Banyule City Council health department officials. It
3 must be made clear no “informed consent” was ever given because even now the relevant issues
4 what those FAKE covid-19 vaccines contained and the harm flowing from it is still to a great
5 extend unknown. Moreover the medical doctors, scientist, politicians and their collaborators
6 were spewing false and misleading information and disinformation to pretend that the FAKE
7 vaccine was protecting people against infection, hospitalisation and even death. And these
8 involved alleged Law Enforcement Agencies that are councils! Clearly one cannot accept that a
9 council that collaborate with home grown and foreign enemies to deliberately harm Australians
10 to be a proper “Law Enforcement Agency”.
11 The same with any “fire danger” where a purported Law Enforcement Officer” goes around
12 pestering private property owners as an alleged fire danger while a property across the road show
13 (as he acknowledged) was a fire danger but that it was excluded from any sanctions, etc.
14
15 Because of the myriad of constitutional and other legal issues that I have canvassed for decades
16 but ongoing ignored by politicians and others we have now arrived that judicial officers
17 themselves are in a questionable position where they seem to lack any proper knowledge about
18 what is constitutionally applicable and permissible. In my view Buloke Shire Council and any
19 other council rather than to seek to litigate against me ought to have the ALARM BELLS
20 ringing that these issues must be investigated in an appropriate manner and not by someone who
21 claims to have a law degree but has blinkers on failing to understand and comprehend the true
22 meaning and application of the relevant constitutions but one who can display an appropriate
23 impartiality to provide a comprehensive investigation and can present possible solutions how to
24 address the myriad od issue I have raised. In the State of Victoria we are having in my view
25 grossly incompetent governments which defies accountability such as to ensure that any
26 Appropriation does not exceed taxation provisions. That is what the legal principle was
27 embedded in the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK). It is totally absurd
28 that a former Premier who I understand committed serious criminal offences somehow now
29 retires with an alleged $300,000 pension for the rest of his life when leaving the State of Victoria
30 in a disastrous financial position! This nonsense and sheer abuse of powers needs to be stopped!
31 Again, instead of litigating Buloke Shire Council would do better to finally seek to address
32 the numerous issues I raised and to seek to have matters appropriately addressed.
33
34
35 We need to return to the organics and legal principles embed in of our federal constitution!
36
37 This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to state all issues/details.
38 Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Gerrit)
39 MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®

40 (Our name is our motto!)

20240419-Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To Buloke Shire Council & Ors

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

20240419-Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To Buloke Shire Council & Ors

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

20240419-Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To Buloke Shire Council & Ors

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Page 1

1 What do you view means “impartial”?

1 IMPARTIAL | definition in the Cambridge English Dictionary

19-4-2024 Page 3 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

1 Yes, according to Cockburn’s statement on 10-3-1891, under a federation, no

19-4-2024 Page 5 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

1 QUOTE Mr. CARRUTHERS:

1 Library of Congress: The Library of Congress houses an extensive collection of historical

19-4-2024 Page 11 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

1 Department of the Legislative Assembly - Parliament of NSW

19-4-2024 Page 13 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

19-4-2024 Page 15 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

1 Responsibilities: The primary responsibilities of a law enforcement agency include crime

19-4-2024 Page 16 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

1 https//study.com › academy › lesson › state-law-enforcement-agencies-roles-models.html

19-4-2024 Page 17 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

19-4-2024 Page 18 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

19-4-2024 Page 19 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

19-4-2024 Page 20 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

19-4-2024 Page 22 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

1 but to be purportedly) vaccinated, which really was a “gene therapy” DEPOPULATION

39 MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®

You might also like