Envi Sci
Envi Sci
Envi Sci
Section: D51B
Task 2: Fertility Rates (Start the Don't Panic documentary at approximately 5.30 min. if
you need to watch it again)
1. 1980: Average fertility rate (number of children born per woman) ____6________.
GDP/Capita ______227.8________. 2012: Average fertility rate _____2.5_______.
GDP/Capita_______883.1_________.
2. Describe the pattern in the fertility rate between1970 and 2012. Has this pattern been linked
to a rapid increase in wealth (GDP/Capita) during this time?
- Bangladesh's fertility rate has been declining, and the average number of children born to
each woman has been dropping over time due to women like Taslima and husbands like Mr.
Khan. This pattern is related to GDP/capita or wealth because having children is largely
determined by economic factors. Bangladesh, a country with less than two children, has a GDP
that is higher than that of nations with more than three children.
3. What reasons did Mr. Khan give for wanting to have just two children?
- Mr. Khan wants to have just two kids so that he can provide for their needs and wants because
he wouldn't be able to afford more if he had more. He wants his kids to have unreserved access
to the material goods they require.
1. Sketch the 1963 chart here. Draw a line between the divide that was visible between the
More Developed Countries (MDCs) and Less Developed Countries (LDCs) and circle the MDC
and LDC clusters that existed during that time.
3. Can you name one region of the world that still lags behind the rest of the world in terms of
fertility rates and life expectancy?
- Sub-Saharan Africa continues to lag behind the rest of the globe in terms of life expectancy
and fertility rates. The majority of nations in the globe are currently nearing the end of their
demographic transitions, with fertility at or below replacement, following decades of rapidly
changing populations. The only region in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) where fertility and
population growth are still strong is an exception to this generalization. According to UN
forecasts, sub-Saharan Africa will have a total fertility rate (TFR) of 4.7 births per woman
between 2015 and 2020, which is more than double the rate of any other region in the world.
The continent's population is predicted to increase from 1 billion in 2015 to over 2 billion in 2050
and about 4 billion in 2100 as a result (United Nations, 2019). Numerous negative
repercussions on both human welfare and the environment are expected to result from this
enormous increase in the human population. There are several reasons why both men and
women want and decide to have large families, according to recent DHS data. There are
commonalities among the various aspects that influence women's decisions, even though they
differ from society to society. Extremely personal decisions about reproduction, and
consequently general fertility levels and trends, are greatly influenced by culture, religious
beliefs, gender relations, and low child survival rates. Not everything is about supply-side
variables.
Task 4: Education and Fertility (Re-watch the sequence on school education and the Khan
family chat about marriage and future job prospects, approx. 15 mins.):
Task 5: Child Mortality Re-watch the sequence where Hanan is helping his parents to tend the
family graveyard (starts at about 20 minutes):
1. How many of Hanan's siblings died?
- Three of hanans sibling died because of measles when they were very young.
2. Do the parents think that this could have been prevented?
- If doctors had been present, they could have been treated and one of them may have lived.
3. What were the percentage mortality rates for children back when Hanan's parents were
young?
- When Hanan's parents were young, one out of every five children in Bangladesh died before
reaching the age of five.
4. Explain why, therefore, did they have many children?
- Even though they didn't think they had too many children or knew what lay ahead, all families
lived in constant fear of losing one or more of their offspring. "You wouldn't lose any more
children if you continued to have children after one died.
5. What is the situation now in Bangladesh and why has child mortality decreased so
dramatically?
- Bangladesh has made tremendous strides in fundamental health over the past few decades,
especially in terms of child survival. Millions of children have been saved by vaccinations,
infection treatments, better nutrition, and hygienic practices. The largest obstacle to family
planning has also disappeared as parents come to terms with the fact that not all of their
children will survive.
Task 6: Education (starts at approximately 42-43 min.)
1. Watch the sequence on wealth distribution on the documentary. Add the daily wage for the
low, middle, and high points of wealth on the bar line.
The bar graph depicts the 7 billion people in the world's wealthiest to worst order. The highest
point of wealth is $100 per day, while the middle and lowest earn $10 and $1, respectively. A
wall separates positions 1 and 2, indicating those that fall into extreme poverty.
4. What issues does look at poverty from a developed or rich point of view pose to those at the
bottom end of the scale?
- The question is whether inequality in developing economies—where it is more prevalent—
poses a significant barrier to increasing growth and decreasing poverty. In both situations,
income redistribution may lead to increased equality, quicker growth, and, in the case of
developing economies, quicker alleviation of poverty. There is undoubtedly a compelling
rationale for allocating resources from the top of the income scale to the bottom in nations
where development is good but helps the poor considerably less than the non-poor. Inequality
can be decreased while also promoting future growth and the alleviation of poverty if wealthy
people pay for improved education for impoverished children. In nations with high levels of
inequality, where social unrest and political unrest, as well as the emergence of populist
regimes, may eventually be detrimental to economic progress, redistributive measures may also
serve to reduce the wealth gap.
The global narrative on progress was created in 1973 by the two hump: the affluent hump (the
North) and the impoverished hump (the South). The South is mostly accounted for by Asia. By
the year 2010, the earth has only one hump. A large portion of Asia, including China, has
improved its economic standing. That is the point that Hans Rosling so eloquently expressed.
What more, though, does the shift imply? First, inequality: The divisions between socioeconomic
groupings both within and between nations matter more for comprehending global disparities
than the nation state. The localization of politics is the second: The focus of social and political
development has changed to domestic arenas due to an increasingly outspoken, literate, and
organized civil society as well as the growth of local middle classes. Topics such as welfare
systems, taxation, and governance should now be the main focus of national discourse. Global
issues such as road traffic, pollution, obesity, and mental health require national attention, while
collective issues like tax evasion and climate change require global solutions to be effective.
These challenges are becoming more commonplace throughout the rest of the world.
To look closely at the validity of claims and blames made by some countries in relation to
climate change and greenhouse emissions, re-watch the sequence of graphics in the last 10
minutes of the documentary: Fossil fuel use and wealth.
1. Explain the relationship between wealth, fossil fuel use and taking the lead on environmental
sustainability. Use statistics as evidence in your response. (use the video to get the information)
Living a good life entails consuming more energy and acquiring more equipment, which could
endanger future generations and cause catastrophic climate change. According to the image,
80% of the energy used worldwide still comes from burning fossil fuels, and scientific research
indicates that the continued use of fossil fuels could have a significant impact on global climate
change. According to the graph, the three richest people, from lowest to richest, used fossil
fuels at a rate of more than 85%. In the upcoming decades, you might become richer than you
realize, even if you are impoverished.