Development of Agricultural Credit in India: Dr.S.Ganesan
Development of Agricultural Credit in India: Dr.S.Ganesan
Development of Agricultural Credit in India: Dr.S.Ganesan
Dr.S.Ganesan
Associate Professor of Commerce, PG & Research Department of Commerce,
Mannar Thirumalai Naicker College, Pasumalai, Madurai.
Introduction
Performance of Indian economy is dependent upon the growth of agriculture sector.
It contributes nearly 16 percent of India’s gross domestic product (GDP) and 13 percent of
total exports. It provides employment to 52 percent of the country’s work force and
livelihood security to more than 620 million people. Agriculture plays an important role in
economic development such as provision of food to the nation, enlarging exports, transfer
of manpower to non-agricultural sectors, contribution to capital formation, and securing
markets for industrialization. It is the backbone of any developing economy like India, as
majority of the population depends directly or indirectly on it. It needs financial support
for its survival.
Agricultural finance includes agricultural credit, saving, income, investment and
capital formation. It is not only agricultural credit. It can be defined as “as an economic
study of financing the farm business”. It is that part of farm management which pertains to
acquisition and use of capital.
Agricultural credit had been recognized as the life blood of all economic activities,
because of the compulsive need to speed up agricultural growth not only to feed a
population of one billion plus but also generate exportable surplus. Alongside, there was a
need to shift product-mix towards animal husbandry, fishery and horticulture which have
immense potential for income generation to rural people, besides boosting the country’s
export earnings considerably.
A United Nations publication had stressed the need for credit for farmers when it
observed, “most of the world’s farmers have to borrow at some time, many of them
heavily. To raise agricultural production they will have to borrow still more and more.
Credit is almost always needed where there is redistribution of right in land. It is thus
required in the interest of agriculture in adequate amounts and at appropriate costs”.
Modern agriculture in the form of new agricultural strategy is a costly affair. It is
interdependent on several interrelated practices, each one of which has to be applied
rationally and in the manner recommended by the extension specialist. Thus scientific
crop-planning had created an unprecedented upsurge in the demand for various types of
inputs of production. This in turn had created a heavy demand for credit.
Review of Literature
Ratheesh, C. et al (2013) in their research article tried to analyse the changing
structure of institutional credit in India in the pre and post reform period, growth of
production credit and investment credit in pre and post reform periods and to study the
relationship between long term credit and private capital accumulation in Indian
agriculture. The study was based on secondary data collected from various issues of
sources. The period of study was from 1970 to 2010. Average growth rate, correlation and
regression methods were used for data analysis. The study found that in the post
independent India, institutional credit was widening while the non-institutional credit
showed a declining trend. But in the later part of the study period, the non-institutional
credit gained its momentum marginally.
Shejal, S.S. (2013) in his research article examined the objectives and
implementation of district credit plan, and its impact on agriculture and industry. Sangli
District in the state of Maharashtra was chosen for the study. The period of the study was
2001-10. Mainly secondary sources of data were used. The study found that more than
90 per cent of the target was achieved in providing agricultural credit except in 2002-03 –
2003-04. Further it was found that utilization of credit was more than 100 per cent for land
development, storage and crop loan. The overall credit utilization decreased from 91 per
cent to 86 per cent during 2001-10. The overall growth rate marginally decreased to 17.99
from 19.55 during the previous period. The study witnessed a marginal increase in the
employment generation by 1.05 per cent during 2002-2010. The study concluded that the
cost of the loan was to be further reduced and loan waiving was to be prevented to
regulate the financial sector.
Varinder Jain and Surjit Singh 2014 in his research articles, “A study of Small,
Marginal, Dalit and Tribal Farmers”. This study has focussed an credit availability and
access among farmers in Rajasthan. It has specifically focused on the disadvantages section
of the farming community such as marginal, small, tribal and dalit farmers. It is observed
that all financial institutions have provided both crop loan and the term loan. In corp loan,
the contribution of all the agencies is significant but regarding term loan, the dominant
position is taken by the commercial banks who could finance the long term loans.
Figure 1
Structure of Agriculture Credit System in India
Government of India
NABARD
Credit Institutions
Table 1
Plan Outlay in Agriculture and Allied Sectors
(Rupees: Crores)
Plan Year Total Outlay Agricultural and Allied Sectors Percentage
I Plan (1951-56) 2,378 354 14.9
II Plan (1956-61) 4,500 501 11.3
III Plan (1961-66) 8,577 1,089 12.7
IV Plan (1969-74) 15,779 2,320 14.7
V Plan (1974-79) 39,426 4,865 12.3
VI Plan (1980-85) 97,500 5,695 5.8
VII Plan (1985-90) 1,80,000 10,525 5.9
VIII Plan (1990-91) 58,369 3,405 5.8
IX Plan (1997-2002) 8,59,200 37,546 4.9
X Plan (2002-2007) 15,25,639 58,933 3.9
XI Plan (2007-2012) 36,44,718 1,36,381 3.7
Source: Planning Commission, Government of India
It is inferred from table 1 that the percentage of plan outlay in agriculture and
allied sectors to total outlay had been on an increasing trend from First Five Year Plan
(1951-56) to Eleventh Five Year Plan (2007-12) except during the Seventh Five Year Plan
(1990-91). The percentage of increase was in a fluctuating trend during all the five year
plans. The highest percentage of increase (14.9 percentages) was observed in the year
1951-1956. During the First Five Year Plan period. The share of agriculture and allied
activities to the total plan outlay has increased from 2,378 crores in 1951- 56 to 36,44,718
crores in the year 2007-2012. The five year plans were successful to some extent but they
suffered from many handicaps, such as lack of identifying the potential beneficiary, flows
in the implementation process, easy availability of private finance and the like. Once again
the small and marginal farmers were in trouble in getting quality inputs as well as finance
which had led to low production and productivity.
Removal of production and distribution bottlenecks for fruits, vegetables, milk, meat,
poultry, fish, and the like. Integrated development of 60,000 villages in rain fed areas
was also planned.
Increasing the production of bajara, jowar, ragi and other millets
Promotion of animal based protein production through livestock development, dairy
farming, piggery, goat rearing and fisheries
Accelerated fodder development programme to benefit farmers in 25,000 villages
Promoting organic farming methods combining modern technology with traditional
farming practices
Special allocations made to NER, special category states and J&K to boost development
Increased allocation under backward regions Grant Fund (BRGF)
Implementation of handloom Weavers’ package to declog the chocked credit lines,
covering 15,000 cooperative societies and benefiting around 3 lakhs handloom weavers.
acres would be covered under SRI, 14,000 acres under SSI, precision farming will be
practised in 22000 acres with an outlay of Rs. 20.93 crores.
The Tamil Nadu Industrial Investment Corporation (TIIC) would provide credit to MSMEs
with a three per cent interest rebate.
Under the World Bank funded “Dam rehabilitation and improvement project”, 18 dams
will be covered during the year. The total outlay for the project will be Rs. 745 crores
over a period of six years.
Proposals were to be drawn for augmenting go down and warehousing facilities at the
PACS and also to increase the storage facilities in agricultural cooperative market
premises and regulated market premises for which Rs. 237 crores were to be set apart
with NABARD assistance under RIDF.
Summary
Agricultural credit had played a vital role in supporting agricultural production in
India. The green revolution characterized of greater use of inputs like fertilizers, seeds and
other inputs increased credit requirements which were provided by the agricultural
financing institution. Though the outreach and the amounts of agricultural credit have
increased over the years, several weaknesses had crept in which have affected the viability
and sustainability of these institutions. Furthermore, antiquated legal frame work and the
out dated laws have hampered the flow of credit and development of strong and efficient
institutions. The highest percentage of increase in first five year plans (14.9 percentages)
was found in the year 1951-1956.The share of agriculture and allied activities to the total
plan outlay had increased from Rs. 2,378 crores in 1951- 56 to Rs. 36,44,718 crores in the
year 2007-2012. It could be seen from the above table that the agency wise kisan credit
card flow of co-operative bank credit had a fluctuating trend from 2004-05 to 2014-2015.
The other banks, comparatively commercial banks had an increasing trend from the year
2004-05 to 2014-15.
Agriculture credit situation brings out the fact the credit delivery to the agriculture
sector contiguous to be inadequate. It appears that the banking system is still hesitant on
various grounds to purvey credit to small and marginal farmers. The situation calls for
concerted efforts to augment the floe of credit to agriculture, alongside exploring new
innovations in product design and methods of delivery, through better use of technology
and related processes.
References
1. Ratheesh C, Peer John, Comparative Analysis of Pre and Post Reform Agriculture Credit
and Capital Formation, Southern Economist, Vol.15, Feb 1, 2013, pp 49-56.
2. Shejal S.S., Role of Commercial and Co-operative Credit in Agriculture and Industry in
Sangli, Southern Economist, April 15, 2013, pp5-8.
3. Varinder Jain and Surjith Singh “A study of Small, Marginal, Dalit and Tribal Farmers”
Institute of Development studies Jaipur (Rajasthan) Sep. 2014 pp178-179.
4. Planning Commission Five Year Plan 1951 -56 to 2007-2012, www.planning commission
5. Prabu ,C., “Agricultural Development in India: A Review under Plan Period” Kisan World
Vol.40 No.2 February: 2013,pp. 35 -37.
6. Compiled from the Annual Credit Plan (2012-13) Published by Lead Bank section,
Canara Bank,pp .68-72.
7. Balishter “Performance of Regional Rural Banks – An Evaluation”, Banking Finance, May
1991,p28.
8. Dr.K.Vetrivel and .Thamarai Selvi “Agricultural Credit in the Pre and Post Reform
Periods -A Case Study Vol.2, Issue IV ISSN : 2230-7850 May ,12, Pp.1-4 .April 5, 2012
Thursday Univision. blogspot.in
9. Amaarjit Singh, A.N. Sadhu and Jasbir Singh “Fundamentals of Agricultural Economics”
ISBN: 978-93-5051-494-8, 2012,pp-402-404
10. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics Oct-Dec-2011 ISSN 0019-5014p.72