Aristotle Notes
Aristotle Notes
Aristotle Notes
International Relations
ARISTOTLE
Theory of Property
• Criticized Plato’s theory of Communism
• Provided justification for private property
• He identified three systems of property:
1. Common ownership and Common use: He reject this because everyone’s property is no
one’s responsibility. It will not be a productive system.
2. Common Ownership and Individual Use: It is impractical and illogical. And will be
exploitative.
3. Individual ownership and Common Use: This is the best system.
Common use because he was aware of the evil consequences of extreme wealth. He believes
in the principle of “golden mean”. Hence, to lead a good life moderate wealth is enough.
Theory of Constitutions
• The state is a self-sufficient unit and this self-sufficiency is not for the purposes of life
alone, but for good and noble life. Noble and good life is happy life.
“By the constitution we mean the organization of the various authorities and in particular
the sovereign authority that is above all the others.”
• Aristotle studied and compared nearly 158 states and their constitution.
• In Book III (Politics): constitutions can be distinguished by the different conceptions
of justice each embodies.
• in the “best” of constitutions, all free men must participate in public decisions and
actions, but not equally because “better” contributions should be recognized,
encouraged and rewarded.
• Constitutions, for Aristotle, are the essential structures of an organization.
• When it comes to the constitution of a polis, the crucial questions are who rules (and to
what extent), and what are the purposes their rule embodies? For these purposes,
constitutions can be classified along two dimensions. One dimension has to do with the
number (and type of person – wealthy? poor?) in the ruling group. The second
dimension has to do with whether the ruling group follows aims that are “proper”, that
is, intended for the good of all, or “perverted”, that is, only for the rulers’ benefit.
Proper Perverted
Theory of Law
• In order to find answers, he weighed pros and cons of both the options and in doing so,
came to the conclusion that law should be supreme.
• Believed in “rule of law”.
• Aristotle believed that rule of law was preferable over that of any individual proposing that
any and every individual, even a king, must be a subject to law.
• “Law is a reason without passions”.
Theory of Revolution
• Aristotle’s theory is divided into two parts:
• 1. First part is a practical manual of conduct advising democrats, aristocrats, monarchs and
oligarchs and even tyrants as how to keep themselves in power.
2.Second part is a treatise on the philosophical basis of the good and stable governments.
• For Aristotle, any change, big or small, violent or non-violent, is a revolution.
• Aristotle is conservative in nature, and hence, not very happy of changes.
• General Causes of Revolution:
1. The main feature of revolution is to be the craving of men for equality. Equality has two
characters-absolute and proportional. The proletariat are passionate to secure absolute
equality for the availability of the same rights that are possessed by few. The few
strugglesfor proportional equality for perpetual upgrading superiority in power and
privilege.
2. Strong desire for justice becomes another feature of revolution. Aristotle was of the view
that men turn to revolution when they think they have not got their dues.
4. Undue priority and prominence of individuals caused great stir in the heart of the
subdued people
6. Elections intrigues and moral degradation kept up in the selection of some people
7. Carelessness shown in granting public offices to disloyal citizens and undue favoritism
shown to the individuals
8. Too much power concentrated in one man or class of men for political gains
12. Free immigration of outside races with different notions of justice and law
1. Democracy
In democracies, revolutions are led by the dogmatic policies of demagogues in attacking the rich.
2. Tyranny or Oligarchy
3. Aristocracy
In aristocracies, revolution held to the policy of narrowing down the circle of the Government.
Aristocracy tends to become oligarchy, through the undue encroachment of the richer classes
polity to become democracy, through the undue aspiration of the poorer class.
2. The various classes in the state without any discrimination of color and creed should be treated
alike and with proper consideration
3. Honors and rewards should be distributed as fairly as possible only to deserving ones because
inequalities of offices and honors drive men to revolt.
4. Political offices should be within reach of every individual who is able of performing his
functions best.
5. The Government should be so vigilantly organized that the political office-holders cannot make
money out of their offices. Bribes and other kinds of illegal gratification should be made quite
impossible to accept.
6.A Government would gain popularity and political stability if it so arranges things that the
internal details of the administration, particularly the administration of public finances is open to
public scrutiny.
9. The habit of obedience and submission to law should be instilled. Lawlessness and anarchy
should not be allowed to creep in even in small and trifling matter.
10. In oligarchy and aristocracy, the inferior class must be well treated and the principles of
democratic equality must be followed among the privileged classes. In democracy, the poor and
the rich should be encouraged to take part in the state administration which does not affect the
sovereign power.
According to Aristotle “A revolution constitutes more a political than a legal change. It had the
effect of reversing ethical, social and economic standard."
Theory of JUSTICE
DISTRIBUTIVE
PARTICULAR CIVIL LAW
JUSTICE CORRECTIVE
CRIMI NAL
UNIVERSAL
LAW
for Aristotle, justice is of two types, viz., universal justice and particular justice. The former
refers to obedience to laws—that one should be virtuous.
As far as particular justice is concerned, it is again of two types, viz., distributive justice and
remedial or corrective justice.
Distributive justice implies that the state should divide or distribute goods and wealth among
citizens according to the merit.
Again, remedial justice is divided into two, dealing with voluntary transactions (civil law) and
the dealing with involuntary transaction (criminal law). Further, Aristotle added commercial and
cumulative justice to the above-mentioned types of justice.
Distributive Justice:
Aristotle was of the opinion that this form of justice is the most powerful law to prevent any
revolution, as this justice believes in proper and proportionate allocation of offices, honours, goods
and services as per their requirement being a citizen of the state.
This justice is mostly concerned with political privileges. Aristotle advocated that every political
organization must have its own distributive justice. He, however, rejected democratic as well as
oligarchic criteria of justice and permitted the allocation of offices to the virtuous only owing to
their highest contributions to the society, because the virtuous people are few. Aristotle believed
that most of the offices should be allocated to those few only.
Corrective Justice:
All laws related to commercial transactions are dealt within the remedial and corrective actions. It
aims to restore what an individual had lost due to the injustice of the society. This justice prevents
from encroachments of one right over the other.
Aristotle opined that corrective justice relates to voluntary and commercial activities such as hire,
sale and furnishing security. These actions involve aggression on life, property, honor and
freedom. In brief, this justice aims at virtue and moral excellence of character and it is for this
reason, it is called corrective justice.