Draft Limited Liability Partnership Bill Act formulae.
Annual accounts must be
prepared, and if the turnover of the llP The limited liability Partnership Bill was exceeds £350,000 annually, the accounts introduced into the House of Commons in must be professionally audited. July this year in response to the grOVving concems surrounding large accountancy 4 These additional reqUirements have made firms moving their business operations a further restriction on the management offshore. large accountancy practices had freedom of llPs necessary. Each llP will expressed their unhappiness about have to appoint a 'designated member' organising their affairs by way of who will be responsible for administrative partnership, especially since a partner is obligations and may incur criminal liability liable under the Partnership Act 1890 for in certain circumstances. On the subject of his own acts as well as for those of his liability, it is worth noting that an llP colleagues. It is unrealistic to assume that member will enjoy less limited liability each partner can stay informed about his than a company director. In the ordinary fellow partners' actions, let alone control course of events, a company director is them. not liable to a third party for his negligent acts or omissions in the course of his 2 Thus, the Bill sets out to create a new duties. His liability is to the company of institution, the limited liability partnership which he is a director. The position is (lLP), in which obligations accrue to the reversed in relation to an llP member. name of the partnership rather than the The claw-back provisions of the Insolvency Joint names of its individual members. The Act 1986 will also apply to llPs. Thus, a only personal liability thai an Individual liquidator will be able to set aside any partner has will be In respect of his pre- transactions (drawings of salary or determined contributIons to partnership repayment of money 0'Ned) within two funds. This is somewhat similar to a years prior to insotvency where the shareholder in a limited liability company. member kne"N, or had reasonable grounds HCMleVer, unlike a company, the llP will for believing. that the llP was or 'NOUld be more flexible in terms of decision- thereby become insolvent making. and board meetings, minutes books, and annual or extraordinary general 5 Indeed, limited liability is ohen highly meetings are not required. In addition, the illusory or perhaps even over-rated, llP will enjoy the tax status of a especially when one considers that banks partnership and limited liability of its ohen require personal investment members. guarantees from directors in order to lih the corporate veil which protects company 3 The Bill is not without its weaknesses, officers. The same will undoubtedly apply however. One weakness which has been to LlPs. observed is the fact that the accounting requirements contained in Part VII of the 6 In conclusion, the value of this new Companies Act 1985 are proposed to institution has been weakened by the apply to the llP. Not only are these rules proposed incorporation of the accounling some of the most demanding in Europe, requirements. That is its single most they will also prove expensive to comply noticeable weakness; otherwise, It could with for small and medium-sized llPs. For be said that the Bill is long overdue and example, the llP must submit an annual will hopefully have the effect of appeasing return to Companies House and maintain those businesses which are consldenng a list of accounts according to Companies moving their operations overseas.