Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Democratic Peace Literature Review

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 8

Title: Mastering the Art of Crafting a Democratic Peace Literature Review

Embarking on the journey of writing a literature review on democratic peace theory can be both
exhilarating and daunting. As one delves into the vast ocean of scholarly articles, books, and research
papers, the task of synthesizing and critically analyzing the existing literature can seem like
navigating through uncharted waters. However, fear not, for help is at hand.

Writing a literature review requires meticulous planning, diligent research, and a keen analytical eye.
It involves not only summarizing the findings of various studies but also identifying gaps,
contradictions, and emerging trends within the literature. Additionally, it necessitates presenting a
coherent narrative that demonstrates your understanding of the topic while also contributing valuable
insights to the academic discourse.

One of the biggest challenges of writing a literature review is sifting through a plethora of sources to
find those that are relevant and credible. With countless articles and books available on democratic
peace theory, distinguishing between seminal works and peripheral contributions can be
overwhelming. Moreover, synthesizing diverse perspectives and theoretical frameworks into a
cohesive narrative requires careful consideration and intellectual rigor.

Furthermore, crafting a literature review that is both comprehensive and concise poses its own set of
challenges. Balancing breadth and depth of coverage while maintaining clarity and coherence can be
a daunting task for even the most seasoned scholars. Moreover, ensuring that the review remains
focused on the central theme of democratic peace theory while addressing related concepts and
debates requires skillful navigation of the scholarly landscape.

Amidst these challenges, it is only natural to seek assistance in crafting a literature review that meets
the highest standards of academic excellence. That's where ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ comes in. With a
team of experienced researchers and writers specializing in political science and international
relations, ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers bespoke literature review writing services tailored to your
specific needs.

By entrusting your literature review to ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, you can rest assured that your paper will
be meticulously researched, expertly written, and delivered on time. Whether you need assistance
with topic selection, literature search, or writing and editing, ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ provides
comprehensive support every step of the way.

Don't let the daunting task of writing a literature review overwhelm you. Take advantage of ⇒
StudyHub.vip ⇔'s professional services and embark on your academic journey with confidence.
Order now and experience the difference firsthand.
Levels of Analysis The democratic peace theory could be analyzed at three levels that are Monadic,
Dyadic and Systemic. However, really democracy is connected with impulsiveness, Manichaeism and
self-interest. Nagel, Stuart S 2000, Critical Issues in Cross-National Public Administration, Quorum
Books, Westport, CT. Democratic Peace Theory has been one of the most hotly debated topics ever
since the 1980s. We do NOT live in a peaceful world There is constant strife, bickering, fighting, and
killing So how can the Bible speak of peace when it doesn’t seem as though peace can ever exist in
this world. After you make your purchase, you will receive an email with instructions on how to
download the app. Although Emmanuel Kant’s work was way ahead of its time, the development of
the Democratic Peace Theory has transformed world politics throughout the years for the betterment
of the state of global democracy and peace. William Gray In 1795 philosopher Immanuel Kant wrote
that if all nations were republics, the citizenry would not vote to go to war except in self-defense. J A
Morrison. Bruce Russett. Immanuel Kant (1724-1804). The DP literature, though, treats this
difference as discrete. OK. So, we have this regularity: democracies don’t fight each other much. In
doing so it analyzed the areas of consensus or near consensus, areas of disagreement, and finally a
separate section on areas of further research. In other words, deliberate policy can sometimes be a
solution to perverse cycles of strife and brutality. Domestic Politics in International Relations
Konstanz, 16.01.2012. At this point, the critical theory offers an alternative explanation for the
behaviors of democratic countries. Perhaps this could be attributed to the fact that the democracies
are still functioning in a world where they have just emerged to be a majority form of government as
compared to the other ways of governing states. Their statistical results provide strong support for
the importance of democratic accountability and norms in shaping decisions to negotiate and settle
disputes as well as to threaten force and escalate to war. At this point, the critical theory offers an
alternative explanation for the behaviors of democratic countries. Domestic Politics in International
Relations Frederic BlesesKonstanz, 16.01.2012. However, democracies recognize the apprehensive
and turbulent nature of global relations. The United States Illogical Practice Of Democratic Peace.
Thus, this study asserts the idea to be cautious against the propositions of the Democratic Peace
Theory because any activities done in the name of spreading democracy may involve a hidden
agenda and disrupt the internal stability of non-democratic countries. Through the development of a
new conceptual approach, and an empirical study strengthened by two methodological
improvements, we provide an alternative explanation of peace than those which currently exist in the
international conflict literature. Analysis Of Implementation Of Track Two Diplomacy By Olga.
Structural factors for instance accountability of democratic leaders and deliberation of decision-
making because of separation of power have functioned as restraining factors inside a couple of
scenarios. The procedures implemented by democratic institutions enable transparency and they
practice communicating their political goals with clarity. Let’s assume the DP exists as an empirical
matter and that you can explain it. Calleo, David P 2001, Rethinking Europe’s Future, Princeton
University Press, Princeton, NJ. The three basic aspects of the EU democratic deficit. Democracies
not only encourage and facilitate a peaceful approach towards conflict resolution, but also the
political class in the democratic states being accountable to the electorate is more likely to be averse
to war and in the favour of a peaceful resolution of impending issues. When democracies decide to
interact with non-democracies, though, they try to accommodate to the latter so that they can avoid
potential threats or exploitations by non-democratic regimes.
Hence, this development of the normative argument gives a better interpretation than the argument
of projecting democratic views in all state-to-state interactions in its narrative for the dual findings of
democratic peace. Kenneth Waltz would argue that, even if states with the same norms and
institutions were peaceful among themselves, the cost of getting all states on the same page is
prohibitively high. Load More. While the author or his work did not get any recognition back during
his time (1795), it was in late twentieth century that In this report, we are to discuss the Democratic
Peace Theory in detail, while also arguing for and against the ideologies published. To Vietnam and
Beyond: Intro to In the Lake of the Woods. Causes and Effects Reform proposals Prospects and
potential for change. At this point, the critical theory offers an alternative explanation for the
behaviors of democratic countries. Moreover, states who are governed democratically are recognized
as predictable and reliable. This is the idea that democracies are always at peace with each other due
to their common practice of democracy, but are prone to have conflict with other non-democratic
states. J A Morrison. Bruce Russett. Immanuel Kant (1724-1804). Thomas Jefferson. Born in 1743.
In Albemarle County, Virginia. The key independent variable—regime type—is found at the level of
the states, the units. Morrow, Randolph M. Siverson, and Alastair Smith. 1999. An Institutional
Explanation of the Democratic Peace. Varied experts and academicians tend to hold that the
nonexistence of war amidst democratic states tends to be the only and perhaps significant empirical
fact that one comes across in one’s study of international relations. What level of analysis do the DP
theorists emphasize. This study revealed that democracies are not pacifist actors in the international
realm. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies. This study
was designed as a theoretical discussion utilising the analysis of primary and secondary sources in
the field, both in printed and electronic materials. Democratic Peace Theory See Full PDF Download
PDF About Press Blog People Papers Topics Job Board We're Hiring. The book is empirical in the
best sense of the word.’. You can download the paper by clicking the button above. By using this
service, you agree that you will only keep content for personal use, and will not openly distribute
them via Dropbox, Google Drive or other file sharing services. It is argued that the intense
subjectivity resorted to by the proponents of the democratic peace theory while defining
democracies is very likely to impact the assertions and results deduced from this theory. The political
leadership in democratic nations only tends to engage in those wars that they can win because of the
fact that the public support for war in democratic states tends to dilute over time. Presently,
advocates of democratic peace theory are starting staring at the empirical record correlation between
democracy and peace (Robinson, 2001). So let us begin our tryst with the understanding of
Democratic Peace Theory (DPT), undertaking all possible arguments withheld by researchers before.
In this, it is concluded that the idea of a representative democracy is the equivalent to Kant’s
“republican constitutions” (Mello, 2014). More conservative critics hold that the democratic peace
theory is a myth and that the democratic states are as much prone or vulnerable to war as the non-
democratic states (Gat 2006). The United States Illogical Practice Of Democratic Peace. The topic
was approached with more perspectives and ideas. Therefore, even if it’s fully acknowledged that
democracies cannot fight each other, the apparent inclination more aggressive democratic states to
readily initiate armed conflicts questions the effectiveness of democracy in sustaining global peace.
Thus, this study asserts the idea to be cautious against the propositions of the Democratic Peace
Theory because any activities done in the name of spreading democracy may involve a hidden
agenda and disrupt the internal stability of non-democratic countries. Hence, this possibility makes
war unviable for both the citizens as well as the leaders. In light of the leading statistical approach to
democratic conflict behavior, there has not been much comparative research conducted on various
types of democracies and present-day conflicts. Domestic Politics in International Relations
Konstanz, 16.01.2012. Averagely, peoples’ influences in decision-making in democratic systems are
somewhat mixed. Kant first introduced this idea in his essay Perpetual Peace, in 1795. This article
examines the explanations for how a democratic peace is achieved and sustained. Overall approval
ratings and consolidation are also commonly considered. Through the development of a new
conceptual approach, and an empirical study strengthened by two methodological improvements, we
provide an alternative explanation of peace than those which currently exist in the international
conflict literature. Autocracy: S can be large or small (rigged elections). The proponents of the
democratic peace theory tend to convey varied hypothesis to explain away the logic inherent in this
theory. Lecture 8 Thursday, 3 March 2011. Admin. Sign-in Sheet Get to work on those papers!. The
Papers. Analyze Author ’ s Understanding of Relationship between Variables influencing
International Politics. Thomas Jefferson. Born in 1743. In Albemarle County, Virginia. Can you say,
“international structure determines IP outcomes”. Democratic peace theory uc cambodia Democratic
peace theory uc cambodia Conflicts presentation Conflicts presentation DG2 Neo-Neo Debate DG2
Neo-Neo Debate Comparison Of Mexico And Nigeria Essay Comparison Of Mexico And Nigeria
Essay Democratic Peace Democratic Peace A Democratic Government A Democratic Government
Causes of war Causes of war Public Relations, Strategy And Theory. Download Free PDF View PDF
Democratic Peace Clara A G Mayerl “While the democratic peace theory is acknowledged as one of
the few “law-like” in social sciences, its causal logic is continuously argued. In this article we refine
our understanding of the liberal peace by. It also allows other countries to comprehend the intent of a
democratic government and their domestic stance. Download Free PDF View PDF See Full PDF
Download PDF Loading Preview Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. It is not necessarily as
simple as it sounds, though. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref. Respectively,
they mainly emphasized institutions and norms. An argument that could be considered dominant
within normative standards believes that democracies project their domestic views of resolutions to
conflict when they interact with other states internationally. To Vietnam and Beyond: Intro to In the
Lake of the Woods. He studied at the College of William and Mary. (Williamsburg, Virginia) 3 rd
President of The United States.(1801-1809) Died on July 4, 1826 (83). The argument may be the
adherents selected the information while using the prime reason behind supporting the idea
(Robinson, 2001). In this, it is concluded that the idea of a representative democracy is the equivalent
to Kant’s “republican constitutions” (Mello, 2014). In other words, they must be less hostile than
mixed dyads and non-democratic states are with each other. Doug Brown St Francis Xavier
University Jan. 2006. Democratic Deficit. What is the Democratic Deficit. This logic implies that
other states are only regarded as legitimate by democracies when those states practice ideologies,
institutions and values that parallel theirs. Under those circumstances, the general accordance is that
the cases of so-called wars between those democracies do not discredit the proposition of democratic
peace.
On one hand, hostile regions that are prone to conflict may administer the idea of developing
dictatorships, and on the other hand, parts of the world that are peaceful may foster the ideas of
trade and social security to shift towards a more democratized state. I’m glad you asked,
Hobbes—because I came up with an explanation even before the darned thing got started. This can
be achieved through political compromise and negotiations. Receive a tailored piece that meets your
specific needs and requirements. It was not until the third generation of research that theorists began
to broaden their research and also find alternative explanations. We will also list a variety of
references with regards to the democratic peace theory. Create more financial aid to get into college
Supporting innovated teaching methods. Secondly, even the most sophisticated dyadic explanations
suffer from serious flaws. Empirical evidence from the military intervention in Libya further
reinforces this argument. A Critical Approach Does Democratic Peace Theory Genuinely Envision
Global Peace. But as transpires from the four books that the essay reviews, democratic peace is more
than an historical finding. Correspondingly, there has not been a lot of research done in attempt to
connect democratic peace theories that exist to theories of democratic conflict behavior. The strength
of these values in Russia and the other new independent states will be the surest foundation for
peace—and the strongest guarantee of our national security—for decades to come. Kant speculates
that, in effect, citizens would not want to go to war if it directly affected them, thus promoting
peaceful relations within participating states. This assertion is conceptualized in the theory known as
the Democratic Peace Theory. However, the same could not be said about the autocratic states. A
Critical Approach Does Democratic Peace Theory Genuinely Envision Global Peace. Democratic
Peace Theory has been one of the most hotly debated topics ever since the 1980s. Domestic Politics
in International Relations Konstanz, 16.01.2012. An Institutional Explanation of the Democratic
Peace. In writing Grasping the Democratic Peace, he was accompanied by anthropologists Carol R.
When approaching democratic peace in terms of dyadic logic, theorists investigate states, or dyads,
in pairs. An Institutional Explanation of the Democratic Peace. It has been argued that the assertion
of this theory is one of the most empirically robust and important findings in the field of international
politics. Under the Democratic Peace Theory, it is also believed that democratic governance breeds a
culture of conciliation and negotiation, thereby undermining violence as a suitable means of
resolving conflicts. Democratic Peace Theory has been one of the most hotly debated topics ever
since the 1980s. He studied at the College of William and Mary. (Williamsburg, Virginia) 3 rd
President of The United States.(1801-1809) Died on July 4, 1826 (83). Susan Green Ap Gov Ch1 Ap
Gov Ch1 Matt Baier Argumentative Essay On Political Polarization Argumentative Essay On
Political Polarization Angie Lee Surname 1 namecourseinstitutiondatewill the spread of Surname 1
namecourseinstitutiondatewill the spread of mayank272369 Who Governs Who Governs rcambou
Articles Of Confederation Rhetorical Analysis Articles Of Confederation Rhetorical Analysis Tara
Smith Analysis Of Implementation Of Track Two Diplomacy By Olga. Overall approval ratings and
consolidation are also commonly considered. This is the idea that democracies are always at peace
with each other due to their common practice of democracy, but are prone to have conflict with other
non-democratic states.
There is no denying the fact that the peaceful and pacific impact of the democratic values is
gradually augmenting with time. The procedures implemented by democratic institutions enable
transparency and they practice communicating their political goals with clarity. Error: Try Again Ok
Sell Watchlist Expand Watch List Loading. The book will quickly claim a secure place in the
literature for its insight and empirical originality. Nevertheless, a superficial review of the historic
record highlights probable counterexamples such as the Civil War along with the war of 1812 an
inclusion of people wars within the record data will likely modify the findings considerably. In this
article we refine our understanding of the liberal peace by. It is not a theory—although we do have
theories to explain it and understand its implications. See Full PDF Download PDF See Full PDF
Download PDF Related Papers Does Democratic Peace Theory Genuinely Envision Global Peace.
Autocracy: S can be large or small (rigged elections). These three theories are the foundation of what
is known as the Kantian Triangle. See Full PDF Download PDF See Full PDF Download PDF
Related Papers Final submission to International Studies Quarterly A Menace to the Democratic
Peace. You should judge extended-term actions under diverse conditions before acceptance levels
are acquired. This meaning, countries only become democratic if their surroundings allow them to.
As articulated by the critical approach, the study also puts forth that the concept of Democratic peace
facilitates the expansionist ambitions of hegemonic powers in the international system by utilizing
various humanitarian interventions and serves as a means to maintain imperialist peace. Domestic
Politics in International Relations Konstanz, 16.01.2012. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board
with our. Susan Green Ap Gov Ch1 Ap Gov Ch1 Matt Baier Argumentative Essay On Political
Polarization Argumentative Essay On Political Polarization Angie Lee Surname 1
namecourseinstitutiondatewill the spread of Surname 1 namecourseinstitutiondatewill the spread of
mayank272369 Who Governs Who Governs rcambou Articles Of Confederation Rhetorical Analysis
Articles Of Confederation Rhetorical Analysis Tara Smith Analysis Of Implementation Of Track
Two Diplomacy By Olga. Under those circumstances, democratic states are held to certain
standards. He studied at the College of William and Mary. (Williamsburg, Virginia) 3 rd President of
The United States.(1801-1809) Died on July 4, 1826 (83). This is the idea that democracies are
always at peace with each other due to their common practice of democracy, but are prone to have
conflict with other non-democratic states. Download Free PDF View PDF Democratic Peace Clara A
G Mayerl “While the democratic peace theory is acknowledged as one of the few “law-like” in social
sciences, its causal logic is continuously argued. On one hand, hostile regions that are prone to
conflict may administer the idea of developing dictatorships, and on the other hand, parts of the
world that are peaceful may foster the ideas of trade and social security to shift towards a more
democratized state. Employing the viewpoint of the critical theory, this paper argues that Democratic
Peace is the disguise of hegemonic relations and the product of the historical block. This practice
reduces misjudgment and uncertainty about what the intentions of a political leader are. In other
words, when Gartzke and Weisiger’s model is properly specified, no dyadic and systemic difference
persists, while democracy emerges as a pacifying factor that reduces the likelihood of interstate
dispute. Domestic Politics in International Relations Konstanz, 16.01.2012. Calleo, David P 2001,
Rethinking Europe’s Future, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. In other words, they must be
less hostile than mixed dyads and non-democratic states are with each other. Structural Explanation
A structural argument for the democratic peace theory tends to put forward the argument that the
democratic states are mostly averse to war because they have democratically elected representative
forms of governments that are directly accountable to the citizens (Nagel 2000, p. 120). Hence, in the
democratic states their always exists the possibility that the leaders venturing for a military response
to the international issues may lose elections. Analysis Of Implementation Of Track Two Diplomacy
By Olga.
Advocates of democratic peace theory support the view that compromise and peaceful resolution of
conflicts within democratic systems can also be propagated to exterior relations. You can use essay
samples to find ideas and inspiration for your paper. This proposal is a comparison of the
comprehensive democratic conflictual involvement, regardless of the variance of states. Download
Free PDF View PDF Democratic Peace Clara A G Mayerl “While the democratic peace theory is
acknowledged as one of the few “law-like” in social sciences, its causal logic is continuously argued.
Democratic peace theory uc cambodia Democratic peace theory uc cambodia Conflicts presentation
Conflicts presentation DG2 Neo-Neo Debate DG2 Neo-Neo Debate Comparison Of Mexico And
Nigeria Essay Comparison Of Mexico And Nigeria Essay Democratic Peace Democratic Peace A
Democratic Government A Democratic Government Causes of war Causes of war Public Relations,
Strategy And Theory. Liberals believe that there are basically only two different types of state in the
international system. On most important attribute of the democratic nations is that they do have a
democratically elected constitutional form of government that is answerable to people. Secretary of
State James Baker, February 5, 1992 Democratic Peace Empirical Finding: No two democracies have
ever fought an interstate war against each other. Besides, the political leaders of democratic nations
also expect and motivate the leaders from other countries to do the same. Fascinating! But is this a
rationalist approach focused on institutions and interests. This compels the necessity to look at the
feature of democratic culture. This practice reduces misjudgment and uncertainty about what the
intentions of a political leader are. An Institutional Explanation of the Democratic Peace. You can
download the paper by clicking the button above. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find
out how to manage cookies. The three basic aspects of the EU democratic deficit. Democratic Peace
Theory has been one of the most hotly debated topics ever since the 1980s. Therefore, how can we
know whether norms or interests have influenced observed foreign policies? “The premise of the
checks-and-balances argument is that constraints on would-be renegade leaders are much more
effective in democratic than in autocratic polities. The winer of the elections was UCD and the
president was Adolfo Suarez. Offer applies to orders shipping within the UK, Europe, Middle East,
Africa, India, and Pakistan. In their dealings with other countries, the political leadership of a
democratic country is more open to compromise, protracted negotiations and third party mediations
(Schultz 2001). Liberals believe that there are basically only two different types of state in the
international system. Download Free PDF View PDF See Full PDF Download PDF Loading
Preview Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. Opposite ends of the spectrum on gasoline tax policy
addressing climate change. Domestic Politics in International Relations Konstanz, 16.01.2012.
National Growth and Poverty Eradication Strategy (NGPES) formulation. Review of Lesson 4 and 5
Review of Lesson 4 and 5 A Relationship Between Democracy And Making The World A. LAO
PEOPLE’S DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC Peace Independence Democracy Unity Prosperity. Kant
speculates that, in effect, citizens would not want to go to war if it directly affected them, thus
promoting peaceful relations within participating states. Ap Gov Ch1 Ap Gov Ch1 Argumentative
Essay On Political Polarization Argumentative Essay On Political Polarization Surname 1
namecourseinstitutiondatewill the spread of Surname 1 namecourseinstitutiondatewill the spread of
Who Governs Who Governs Articles Of Confederation Rhetorical Analysis Articles Of
Confederation Rhetorical Analysis Analysis Of Implementation Of Track Two Diplomacy By Olga.
The restriction of the theory to the rise and decline of only major powers has also been lifted, as
power cycles have proven relevant in explaining regional political systems such as the Persian Gulf
(Parasiliti, 2003) and South Asia (Kumar, 2003). Liberals believe that there are basically only two
different types of state in the international system. Download Free PDF View PDF International
Studies Quarterly A Menace to the Democratic Peace. We propose a genuine dyadic perspective that
regards democratic. This is, firstly, due to new statistical support indicating that democracies are
slightly, but significantly less involved in war than others, and that they initiate wars less frequently
than non-democratic states. It is not necessarily as simple as it sounds, though. Lincoln:
“Government of the people, by the people and for the people.” Four basic elements central to all
notions of democracy: Participation. National Growth and Poverty Eradication Strategy (NGPES)
formulation. At this point, the critical theory offers an alternative explanation for the behaviors of
democratic countries. Their statistical results provide strong support for the importance of democratic
accountability and norms in shaping decisions to negotiate and settle disputes as well as to threaten
force and escalate to war. It was commonly noted at the time that the overall strength of these
observations on the topic of democratic peace were still inadequate. An Institutional Explanation of
the Democratic Peace. An Institutional Explanation of the Democratic Peace. In this regard, it
cannot be exclusively concluded that Democratic Peace Theory was employed. If I were to classify
the DP in terms of its level of analysis, where would I put it. It is rare that democracies go to war
against one another. Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service. Download Free
PDF View PDF See Full PDF Download PDF Loading Preview Sorry, preview is currently
unavailable. The empirical association between peace and democracy has been challenged and
debated since the inception of this theory to the current times. However, many studies do suggest
that in case the nations tend to democratize under circumstances when the democratic institutions
within them are weak or the vested interests in them resent the change to democracy, under such
circumstances, the democratization in a nation may gravitate to a more nationalistic sentiment,
thereby flaring into unwarranted conflicts and warfare (Bukovansky 2002). Coin Commemorating
the Opening of the Congress of Vienna. The procedures implemented by democratic institutions
enable transparency and they practice communicating their political goals with clarity. Hence, it is a
mere coincidence that the democratic states seldom engaged in war with each other (Gat 2006). This
includes their involvement with the media and private interest groups, but it also includes citizens,
the governing body, and the administration. Employing the viewpoint of the critical theory, this
paper argues that Democratic Peace is the disguise of hegemonic relations and the product of the
historical block. Empirical evidence from the military intervention in Libya further reinforces this
argument. They come to the conclusion that democracy, economic interdependence and international
organizations are factors that collectively reinforce peaceful relations between states. An Institutional
Explanation of the Democratic Peace. It also allows other countries to comprehend the intent of a
democratic government and their domestic stance. This can be achieved through political
compromise and negotiations.

You might also like