Title: Mastering the Art of Literature Review in Research Papers

Embarking on the journey of writing a thesis is an intellectually stimulating yet challenging task.
Among the various components that make up a thesis, the literature review stands as a crucial pillar.
It is the backbone upon which the entire research paper rests, providing a comprehensive
understanding of existing scholarship relevant to the study at hand.

Crafting a literature review requires a meticulous approach. It involves delving into an extensive
array of scholarly works, analyzing their methodologies, findings, and theoretical frameworks, and
synthesizing this information to construct a coherent narrative that supports the research objectives.
However, the complexity of this task often overwhelms students, leaving them feeling daunted and
unsure of where to begin.

Indeed, the intricacies of conducting a literature review can be daunting. From navigating through a
vast sea of academic literature to critically evaluating the credibility and relevance of sources, the
process demands both time and expertise. Moreover, ensuring that the review seamlessly integrates
with the broader research narrative adds another layer of complexity.

In light of these challenges, seeking professional assistance can be a wise decision. ⇒

By entrusting your literature review to ⇒ BuyPapers.club ⇔, you can alleviate the stress and
uncertainty associated with this daunting task. Our experts meticulously scour through the relevant
literature, critically evaluate each source, and synthesize key findings to construct a cohesive and
compelling narrative that strengthens the overall research paper.

In conclusion, mastering the art of literature review writing is undoubtedly challenging, but it is an
essential skill for every aspiring researcher. With the assistance of ⇒ BuyPapers.club ⇔,
navigating through this intricate process becomes more manageable, allowing you to focus your
energy and attention on other aspects of your thesis. Trust ⇒ BuyPapers.club ⇔ for expert
guidance and support on your academic journey.
After the literature review is complete, you should incorporate it into your research paper (if you are
writing the review as one component of a larger paper). Literature reviews are commonly used in
fields such as sociology, psychology, anthropology, and political science. By analyzing and
synthesizing the literature, you can identify areas where further research is needed and where new
insights can be gained. Current Cochrane guidance informs selection of tools for quality assessment
and of synthesis method. Some questions to ask: How are they organizing their ideas. In addition,
those works whose theories and conclusions directly support your findings will be valuable to review
here. A good RRL DOES: Present a brief typology that orders articles and books into groups to help
readers focus on unresolved debates, inconsistencies, tensions, and new questions about a research
topic. It is often used in fields where knowledge is rapidly evolving, such as technology or medicine.
Patient and Staff Engagement in Health System Improvement: A Qualitative Evaluation of the
Experience-Based Co-design Approach in Canada. Fourth, protocols, checklists and bundles are used
— most effectively when local ownership is encouraged. Once the issue is clarified, sticking to it
without giving any unnecessary information is essential. A distinction can be made between two
types of collective leadership. JMIR Hum Factors. 2018;5(1):e8083. Schaaf M, Topp SM, Ngulube
M. Importantly, narrative reviews can also be used as educational articles to bring practitioners up to
date with certain topics of issues ( Green et al., 2006 ). Recently, there have been several efforts to
introduce more rigour in narrative reviews that will elucidate common pitfalls and bring changes into
their publication standards. More and more cultural studies scholars are accepting popular media as a
subject worthy of academic consideration. The team seeks to align the review question and the
requirements of the knowledge user with available time and resources. It has not been vetted by BMJ
Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. This is because you’ve just
finished reading Moby Dick, and you wonder if that whale’s portrayal is really real. These wider
ranges of studies highlight that a particular intervention or group of interventions may work well for
one professional group but be ineffective for another. This is particularly true in disciplines in
medicine and the sciences where research conducted becomes obsolete very quickly as new
discoveries are made. These phrases act as umbrella terms that refer to overlapping concepts such as
shared, collaborative, distributed, pooled and relational leadership. A literature or narrative review is
a comprehensive review and analysis of the published literature on a specific topic or research
question. Body: Contains your discussion of sources and is organized either chronologically,
thematically, or methodologically (see below for more information on each). BMC Res Notes.
2011;4:212.. Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Grimshaw JM, Shirran L, Thomas R,
Mowatt G, Fraser C, Bero L, et al. It is practiced in almost all fields including arts, computer science,
science, history, and social science etc. Umbrella literature review: This review is used to provide a
broad overview of a large and diverse body of literature on a particular topic. This guidance covers
the review process as it relates to synthesis of. If any part does not pass inspection, immediately
remove the harness from service and destroy. 4 inspection point for safety harness. FREE 1. They
noted that a wide selection of different healthcare professionals and patients engaged with this type
of social media and its global reach may be significant for low- and middle-income countries.
Evaluate the sources you find to determine if they are relevant to your research question.
It also ensures neither the research analysis was done before nor it is a replication study. Instead, it
focuses on the “methods” of the researcher or writer. Examples of Literature Review Here’s an
example of how a literature review can be conducted for a thesis on the topic of “ The Impact of
Social Media on Teenagers’ Mental Health”: Start by identifying the key terms related to your
research topic. A student taking a course in science deals with several papers within their time in
college. The literature review in a dissertation or thesis is both comprehensive and helps make up a
larger work. The individual component strategies of the toolkits were highly variable though the
authors suggest that they align most closely with educational strategies. You’re guaranteed smooth
cooperation with a writing service expert who matches the requirements for your literature review.
Leadership models can be regarded as resembling a colour palette that offers a variety of choices,
and similar to colours, some models fit a situation better than others. For more information about
this step, please see the Using Databases and Finding Scholarly References section of this website.
3. Read through the research that you have found and take notes. Assess the methodology, findings,
and limitations of each study to showcase your analytical skills. All authors contributed to screening
and quality appraisal. The proper sequence allows moving from one question to another, avoiding
chaos in writing. E.g., a body part in the standard literature review samples often is organized
chronologically, moving from the older findings to the newest research. But if you find yourself
wanting to put in more quotes, check with your instructor. The third worked in peer support and had
personal experience with mental health services. The literature review gives you a chance to:
Demonstrate your familiarity with the topic and its scholarly context Develop a theoretical
framework and methodology for your research Position your work in relation to other researchers
and theorists Show how your research addresses a gap or contributes to a debate Evaluate the
current state of research and demonstrate your knowledge of the scholarly debates around your
topic. An rQES team, in particular, cannot afford any extra time or resource requirements that might
arise from either a misunderstanding of the review question, an unclear picture of user requirements
or an inappropriate choice of methods. Searching for eligible studies using multiple databases and
information sources, including grey literature sources, without any language restrictions. How does
the publication relate to other literature in the field. Correct my document today Writing literature
reviews can be quite challenging. Where data is less plentiful then surveys or other qualitative data
sources may need to be included. Natural Sciences: In natural sciences, literature reviews are used to
summarize and evaluate the current state of knowledge in a particular field or subfield. If our above
questions meet your queries, then you have landed to the right destination. An example of this
approach in the eHealth domain is offered by DeShazo, Lavallie, and Wolf (2009). Reviewing
progress in public involvement in NIHR research: developing and implementing a new vision for the
future. BMJ Open. 2018;8(7):e017124. Byrne L, Stratford A, Davidson L. A methodological scope
will influence either the types of documents in the review or the way in which these documents are
discussed. Elusive search for effective provider interventions: a systematic review of provider
interventions to increase adherence to evidence-based treatment for depression. Many higher
institutes and universities ask students to write literature reviews in the final year. Limitations of
Literature Review Limitations of Literature Review are as follows: Limited scope: Literature
reviews can only cover the existing literature on a particular topic, which may be limited in scope or
depth. Evaluating the Prosper peer-led peer support network: a participatory, coproduced evaluation.
This review provides further evidence that we need to bring qualitative approaches in from the
periphery to play a central role in many implementation studies and subsequent evidence syntheses.
This showed a positive improvement in adherence to evidence-based guidelines but not to patient
outcomes. Save all of your applicable resources as you will need to include them in your paper.
Instead, it focuses on the “methods” of the researcher or writer. A literature review in this sense is
just like any other academic research paper. Historical literature review: This type of review
examines the historical development of research on a particular topic or research question. Various
reasons prompt students to seek assistance with their assignments. Critically evaluate: mention the
strengths and weaknesses of your sources. In the last 36 months, he received royalties from
Systematic Approaches To a Successful Literature Review (Sage 3rd edition), honoraria from the
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and travel support from the WHO. Steps in the
Literature Review Process Define your research question Determine inclusion and exclusion criteria
Choose databases and search Review Results Synthesize Results Analyze Results Librarian Support
What is a Literature Review. We’ve also included links to free resources to help you understand how
to write each section. Second, they utilise leadership drawing on a wide set of clinical and non-
clinical actors including managers and even government officials. Write in well-structured
paragraphs: use transitions and topic sentences to draw connections, comparisons and contrasts. By
regularly reviewing the literature, you can stay informed about the latest findings and developments
in your field. Sustainability. 2018;10(11):4148. Cooke J, Langley J, Wolstenholme D, Hampshaw S.
The protocol should always be publicly available ( table 2, item R2). 24 25 Formal registration may
require that the team has not commenced data extraction but should be considered if it does not
compromise the rQES timeframe. A realist process evaluation within the Facilitating Implementation
of Research Evidence (FIRE) cluster randomised controlled international trial: an exemplar. The
similarity score of your literature overview will be low if you use our writing service. Holding
degrees in more than 50 subjects, they know how to create masterpieces. Sometimes new findings
are published before a study is completed and need to be incorporated into the current work. It aims
to provide a theoretical framework for understanding a particular research question. Usually, it’s
unnecessary, but if an abstract is mentioned in the requirements, consider adding it to the working
plan. This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file
supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content. Plenty of information mentioned years
ago remains relevant, so it’s better not to miss it. A methodological scope will influence either the
types of documents in the review or the way in which these documents are discussed. How does the
publication relate to other literature in the field. Cite this Scribbr article If you want to cite this
source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to
automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Publications, 1998; Jesson, Jill. You’re guaranteed smooth cooperation with a writing service expert
who matches the requirements for your literature review. It is often written as part of a thesis,
dissertation, or research paper, in order to situate your work in relation to existing knowledge. A
review organized in this manner would shift between time periods within each section according to
the point made.
Utilize reputable academic databases for literature searches like Google Scholar or your university's
library resources. Edit and proofread: Once you have written your literature review, edit and
proofread it carefully to ensure that it is well-organized, clear, and concise. On the other hand, the
writing professional will present original conclusions based on the already conducted research. The
academic proofreading tool has been trained on 1000s of academic texts and by native English
editors. You may want to consider the publication date, author’s credentials, and the journal or book
publisher. They noted that a wide selection of different healthcare professionals and patients engaged
with this type of social media and its global reach may be significant for low- and middle-income
countries. Rich studies are often found in specialist qualitative research or social science journals.
Don't worry! This blog is your guide for writing a literature review. First, all titles and abstracts were
screened by one reviewer to determine whether the study met the inclusion criteria. Read them to get
a sense of the types of themes you might want to look for in your own research or to identify ways
to organize your final review. Keep careful notes so that you may track your thought processes
during the research process. However, if there are some points that need clarification or are missing
from the overall context, they should be mentioned. I am happy with the writing, especially the
sources used. Check the basic literature review format and elements used in the example. Here are a
few other sections you might want to consider: Current Situation: Information necessary to
understand the topic or focus of the literature review. A research paper assigned in a course A thesis
or dissertation A grant proposal An article intended for publication in a journal All these instances
require you to collect what has been written about your research topic so that you can demonstrate
how your own research sheds new light on the topic. Be selective Select only the most important
points in each source to highlight in the review. If there are conflicts or gaps in existing literature,
you can also discuss these in your review, as well as how you will confront these missing elements or
resolve these issues in your study. Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional
claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Identifies critical gaps and points of
disagreement. A literature review in this sense is just like any other academic research paper. Hire a
qualified literature review writer and take a load off your chest. Every writer holds a degree and
knows authoritative literature in their subject. The goal is to deliberately document, critically
evaluate, and summarize scientifically all of the research about a clearly defined research problem.
The subsections might include how they are personified, how their proportions are exaggerated, and
their behaviors misunderstood. Where plentiful reviews already exist, a team may decide to conduct
a review of reviews 5 by including multiple QES within a mega-synthesis 28 29 ( table 2, item R6).
However, how opinion leaders had an impact could not be determined because of insufficient details
were provided, illustrating that reporting specific details in published studies is important if diffusion
of effective methods of increasing evidence-based practice is to be spread across a system.
Addressing the problem of rural community engagement in healthcare service design. Doing a
Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination. Source:
cdn.slidesharecdn.com Scientific review summary examples: This article discusses the types of
systematic review, systematic review protocol and its registration, and the.
Most, if not all, peer-reviewed journals in the fields of medical informatics publish review articles of
some type. Coproduction relies on leadership at all levels, ranging from senior managers to local
“champions” and including the citizens and third-sector organizations that participate in
coproduction activities and practices. The narrower your topic, the easier it will be to limit the
number of sources you need to read in order to get a good survey of the material. You may want to
consider the publication date, author’s credentials, and the journal or book publisher. TemplateLab
templatelab.com ?? How To Do A Review Article. The proper sequence allows moving from one
question to another, avoiding chaos in writing. E.g., a body part in the standard literature review
samples often is organized chronologically, moving from the older findings to the newest research.
Maybe you’re on the verge of getting a doctorate and want a literature review to be just ideal.
Persuasiveness -- which of the author's theses are most convincing or least convincing. It also
illustrates the multiplicity and complexity associated with coproduction leadership activities by
outlining practices in which leaders must engage to ensure success. Hire a qualified literature review
writer and take a load off your chest. We revise these tips periodically and welcome feedback. It
contains a briefing note on literature review including definition, elements, strategies, and its types.
Firstly, the diversity of the systematic reviews in terms of clinical topic or setting is an important
factor. A summary is always much shorter than the original text. It aims to provide a comprehensive
understanding of the current state of knowledge on a particular topic. The pool of writers on this
platform encompasses experts in every literature review type. The effectiveness of implementation
strategies for promoting evidence informed interventions in allied healthcare: a systematic review.
History: The chronological progression of the field, the research literature, or an idea that is
necessary to understand the literature review, if the body of the literature review is not already a
chronology. Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems; 2011. Problem
formulation -- which topic or field is being examined and what are its component issues? 2.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019.. Arditi C, Rege-Walther M, Durieux P, et al. Carefully edit to
ensure logical argument flow and concise writing. For example, in a given study, perhaps some of
the main concepts are X, Y, and Z. A realist process evaluation within the Facilitating
Implementation of Research Evidence (FIRE) cluster randomised controlled international trial: an
exemplar. Download Word doc Download Google doc Before you begin searching for literature,
you need a clearly defined topic. Study protocols were excluded because we wanted to capture
lessons drawn from implementation, and conference papers were excluded because they lacked
sufficient detail. A safe place to reflect on the meaning of recovery: a recovery community co-
productive approach using multimedia interviewing technology. Writing a summary does not involve
critiquing or if the text is a scientific paper that follows a standard empirical structure, it is for
example, in a literature review or research paper, you may want to briefly summarize this study as.
This link opens in a new window Contact a Librarian Ask a Librarian Definition: A literature review
is a systematic examination and synthesis of existing scholarly research on a specific topic or subject.
In the biosciences, review articles written by researchers are valuable tools for those looking for a
synopsis of several research studies in one place without having to spend time finding the research
and results themselves.
Open access funding provided by Jonkoping University. Some strategies that did not fit easily within
the EPOC categories were also included. Include each of the key concepts or variables you’re
interested in, and list any synonyms and related terms. You can add to this list as you discover new
keywords in the process of your literature search. These were social media strategies and toolkits,
and multi-faceted interventions (MFIs) (see Table 2 ). By submitting this form, you are
acknowledging that the harness passed inspection. For more information about this step, please see
the Using Databases and Finding Scholarly References section of this website. 3. Read through the
research that you have found and take notes. This sensitivity to motivation, context and power is
helpful for our understanding of leadership in coproduction. Introduction. Literature review papers
(LRPs) are often very helpful for researchers, as the reader gets an up-to-date and well-structured
overview of the literature in a specific area, and the review adds value. It provides background and
context, and shows how your research will contribute to the field. After the introduction, it grounds
your research in a scholarly field and leads directly to your theoretical framework or methodology.
Informing research design and methodology: A literature review helps to inform research design and
methodology by identifying the most appropriate research methods, techniques, and instruments.
Does it confirm, add to, or challenge established knowledge. Public services management and co-
production in multi-level governance settings. This means that sometimes a scientific literature
review can be highly theoretical, in addition to focusing on specific methods and outcomes of
previous studies. Other Sections of Your Literature Review Once you've decided on the
organizational method for your literature review, the sections you need to include in the paper
should be easy to figure out because they arise from your organizational strategy. These hacks help
you understand how to prepare your literature research correctly, avoiding numerous common
mistakes. Social capital, management capacity and public service performance: Evidence from the
US states. We therefore determined that this exclusion criterion was justifiable. Consult with a
librarian about identifying research databases in other disciplines; almost every field of study has at
least one comprehensive database devoted to indexing its research literature. We note a distinction
between theoretical and atheoretical systematic review discussion sections. Qualitative versus
quantitative research Empirical versus theoretical scholarship Divide the research by sociological,
historical, or cultural sources Theoretical: In many humanities articles, the literature review is the
foundation for the theoretical framework. Towards a new paradigm of healthcare: Addressing
challenges to professional identities through Community Operational Research. All authors (AB, IS,
JN, CH, FC) have given final approval of the version to be published. Quality control must be fit for
purpose but not excessive. Co-production as a route to employability: Lessons from services with
lone parents. Senior leaders could use a “top-down” approach to promote user involvement. A
literature review is a comprehensive overview of all the knowledge available on a specific topic till
date. Processes in an experience-based co-design project with family carers in community mental
health. SAGE Open. 2018;8(4):2158244018809220. It can be helpful to make an annotated
bibliography, where you compile full citation information and write a paragraph of summary and
analysis for each source. FAQs: Research Paper Template What format is the template (doc, pdf, ppt,
etc.). The research paper template is provided as a Google Doc.
Chronological The simplest approach is to trace the development of the topic over time. Problem
formulation -- which topic or field is being examined and what are its component issues? 2. The nine
leadership practices identified can be enacted by different people and in different ways. Rapid
reviews methods series: guidance on rapid qualitative evidence This paper forms part of a series of
methodological guidance from the Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group and addresses rapid
qualitative evidence syntheses (QESs), which use modified systematic, transparent and reproducible
methodsu to accelerate the synthesis of qualitative evidence when faced with resource constraints.
Susan Macicak: Linguistics Imelda Vetter: Dell Medical School For help in other subject areas,
please see the guide to library specialists by subject. Also, make sure to include opposing views (and
not just supporting evidence). What are the key concepts and how are they defined. Literature
reviews are written occasionally in the humanities, but mostly in the sciences and social sciences; in
experiment and lab reports, they constitute a section of the paper. The critique begins by
summarizing the article and then analyzes and evaluates the author's research. Our framework also
has some practical implications for coproduction leaders and participants. You can use your literature
review as evidence of what works, what doesn’t, and what is missing in the field. Analysis: Involves
critically evaluating and summarizing key findings, methodologies, and debates found in. However,
it is also where you get to learn about the topic in great detail. Use Caution When Paraphrasing
When paraphrasing a source that is not your own, be sure to represent the author's information or
opinions accurately and in your own words. Plenty of information mentioned years ago remains
relevant, so it’s better not to miss it. You can emphasise the timeliness of the topic (“many recent
studies have focused on the problem of x”) or highlight a gap in the literature (“while there has been
much research on x, few researchers have taken y into consideration”). A framework for
coproduction leadership When coproduction is initiated, it is possible to consider the actors involved
and to imagine various forms of coproduction. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising
from any reliance placed on the content. Some databases to search for journals and articles include:
Your university’s library catalogue Google Scholar Project Muse (humanities and social sciences)
Medline (life sciences and biomedicine) EconLit (economics) Inspec (physics, engineering and
computer science) You can use boolean operators to help narrow down your search: Read the
abstract to find out whether an article is relevant to your question. In clinical or biomedical journals
less rich findings may be placed within a single table or box. Conclusion: Summarize what you
discovered, highlight any important contributions, and suggest areas for future research. To inform
research design: A literature review can inform the design of your research study by identifying
appropriate research methods, data sources, and research questions. Many systematic reviews, but
not all, use statistical methods to combine the results of independent studies into a single quantitative
estimate or summary effect size. Introduction This paper forms part of a series from the Cochrane
Rapid Reviews Methods Group providing methodological guidance for rapid reviews. Strategies for
writing the literature review Find a focus. Critical Evaluation Critical evaluation involves assessing
the quality and validity of the literature. Health Sciences: In health sciences, literature reviews are
used to evaluate the effectiveness of treatments, identify best practices, and determine areas where
more research is needed. There is much less evidence that these strategies have shifted patient
outcomes. In particular, we would like to thank Mary McCall for valuable help. Interventions in
health care professionals to improve treatment in children with upper respiratory tract infections.