4TH Sem Indian Economy Lec 1
4TH Sem Indian Economy Lec 1
4TH Sem Indian Economy Lec 1
Industrialization – more and more exploitation of available resources raise standard of living.
Higher income leads to more and more satisfaction of materialistic wants. A Religious view
considers development as a positive change in whole of Human life- materialistic, social and
spiritual.
An increase in real economic variables (National Output) over a long period of time is economic
growth. Growth is Quantifiable- An important feature of growth is that it can be measured. For
e.g. industrial production, road length, food production, educated persons, or per capita income
of people can be measured or calculayed. Growth rates can be calculated annually in percentage
across various sectors. It can be positive or negative. It is measured over a short period.
Michael Todaro says, an increase in living standards, improvement in self- esteem needs and
freedom from oppression as well as a greater choice is development. Economic Development is
the overall well-being of the citizens of a country. It also leads to the creation of more
opportunities in the sectors of education, healthcare, employment and the conservation of the
environment. Economic development means both more output or production and changes in the
technical and institutional arrangements by which factors of production are produced and
distributed. Economic growth on the other hand, is a narrower concept than economic
development. It is defined as the increase in the value of goods and services produced by every
sector of the economy. It is usually expressed in terms of the gross domestic product or GDP of
the country.
Life Sustenance: The life-sustaining basic human needs include food, shelter, health and
protection. When any one of these is absent or in critically short supply, a condition of absolute
"underdevelopment" exists.
Self-esteem: A second universal component of good life is self- esteem- a sense of worth and
self-respect of not being used as a tool by others for their own ends. Due to the significance
attached to material values in developed nations, worthiness and esteem are now-a days
increasingly conferred only in countries that possess economic wealth and technological power-
those that have developed.
Freedom: Arthur Lewis stressed the relationship between economic growth and freedom from
servitude when he concluded that "the advantage of economic growth is not that wealth increases
happiness, but that it increases the range of human choice Goulet, D. (1971) The Cruel Choice:
A New Concept in the Theory of Development, New York, Athenaeum.
Measurement of Economic Development:
. Economic development is measured as increase in Gross National Product (GNP): GNP is the
total value of all final goods and services produced within a nation in a particular year, plus
income earned by its citizens (including income of those located abroad), minus income of non-
residents located in that country. Basically, GNP measures the value of goods and services that
the country's citizens produced regardless of their location. The GNP is one measure of the
economic development and it is assumed that higher GNP leads to higher standard of living.
Closely related to GNP is Gross Domestic Product (GDP) it is the market value of all final goods
and services produced in a country in a given year.
Economic development is measured as increase in GNP over a long period of time. GNP as a
measure of national development is faced with several challenges such as:
Economic development is measured as increase in per capita income this relates to increase in
the per capita real income of the economy over the long period. However, several difficulties still
remain:-
i. An increase in per capita income may not raise real standard of living of the population.
ii. There is possibility that the poor remains poor despite an increase in the real GNP per capita
iii. International comparisons of the real GNP per capita are inaccurate due to exchange rate
conversion of different currencies into a common currency.
iv. The real GNP per capita fails to take into account problems associated with basic needs like
nutrition, health, sanitation, housing, water and education. Despite these limitations, the real
GNP per capita is the most widely used measure.
Welfare - Economic development is often measured from a welfare point of view. From this
perspective, economic development is regarded as a process whereby there is an increase in the
consumption of goods and services by individuals. Welfare as a measure of economic
development has its own limitations:
i. Consumption of goods and services depend on the taste and preferences of individuals.
It is difficult to prepare a welfare index.
ii. The composition of the total output between capital goods and consumer goods.
iii. From the welfare point of view, we must also consider not only what is produced but
how it is produced.
iv. Income distribution is also very important.
Social Indicators: Some economists have tried to measure it in terms of social indicators. Some
indicators are ‘inputs’ e.g. nutrition standards or number of hospital beds or doctors per head of
population while others are outputs e.g. infant mortality rates, sickness rates etc. Social
indicators are normally referred to as basic needs of development. The limitations of social
indicators as measures of economic development include:
i. There no unanimity among economist as to the number and type of items to be included
in such an index.
ii. There is the problem of assigning weights to the various items which may depend upon
the social, economic and political set-up of the country.
iii. Majority of indicators are ‘inputs’ and not ‘outputs’ such as education, health etc
iv. They involve ‘value judgments’ still economists have prepared a HDI index which has
now been accepted worldwide.
Independent of Structural, Institutional and Technical Changes: Economic growth may occur
independent of any structural, institutional and technical changes in the economy. These
Associated with socio-technological Change: Economic development is invariably associated
with significant structural, institutional and technical changes in the economy. Development is a
qualitative concept and relates to human development index (HDI) Gender Development Index
(GDI) Human Poverty Index (HPI). Growth is quantitative concept.
The realization that traditional theories of development have not succeeded in resolving the
problems of poverty, hunger, health etc led to a search for alternative formulations. As a result,
explanations of underdevelopment became the focal point of this thinking. The origin of
underdevelopment theories are outcome of two distinct sources i.e
i. the theoretical debate within Marxism and
ii. the experiences of development in Latin America.
In his book “Capitalism and Underdevelopment in Latin America” Andre Gunder Frank
explains that development and underdevelopment are both necessary result and contemporary
manifestation of internal contradictions in the world capitalist system. Economic
development and underdevelopment are relational and qualitative. Each of them is actually
different from, yet caused by its relations with the others. He substantiates his argument by
stating that economic development and underdevelopment are the opposite faces of the same
coin. Andre Gunder Frank considers underdevelopment as not merely the lack of
development. He argues that before there was any development there was no
underdevelopment. Development and underdevelopment are related through the common
historical process both have shared during the past several centuries and the mutual or
reciprocal influences that they have had, still have and will continue to have on each other
through history. In this process colonization has got an important place and Frank writes that
colonial exploitation which was part of the early expansion of the mercantilist system may
have made critically important contribution to the development of capitalist successors now
developed members. Thus this notion of development and underdevelopment is based on the
concept of exploitation. It may be associated with the contradiction of one class and another,
the exploitation beneficiaries and the exploiting contributors to the process of capitalist
development. Another eminent economist Gunnar Mydral defines development as “the
process of moving away from underdevelopment” and characterizes under developed country
as one where there is “a constellation of numerous undesirable conditions for work and life,
outputs, incomes and levels of living are low, many modes of production, attitudes and
behavioural patterns are disadvantageous and there are unfavorable institutions, ranging from
those at the state level to those governing social and economic relations in the family and the
neighborhood. They are considered as undesirable from the standpoint of the desirability of
development, a characterization affiliated with vagueness, but definite enough to permit its
use.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---