Writing a literature review can be a daunting task for many university students, especially those at the

University of Toronto. It requires extensive research, critical analysis, and the ability to synthesize
information from various sources. Many students struggle with organizing their thoughts and
findings coherently, resulting in a disjointed and ineffective literature review.

Moreover, the sheer volume of scholarly articles and academic journals available can overwhelm
students, making it difficult to identify relevant sources and extract key information. This can lead
to frustration and procrastination, further exacerbating the challenge of writing a literature review.

To alleviate this burden, students at the University of Toronto can turn to professional writing
services for assistance. ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers expert guidance and support in crafting well-
structured and comprehensive literature reviews. Their team of experienced writers specializes in
various academic disciplines and can help students navigate the complexities of literature review
writing.

By outsourcing their literature review to ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, students can save time and energy
while ensuring the quality and effectiveness of their academic work. With personalized assistance
and timely delivery, ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ is the go-to solution for University of Toronto students
seeking reliable support with their literature review assignments.
Write in well-structured paragraphs: use transitions and topic sentences to draw connections,
comparisons and contrasts. Based on your reading and notes, you can look for: Trends and patterns
(in theory, method or results): do certain approaches become more or less popular over time.
Corresponding authors Correspondence to Fabrizio Di Francesco, Giuseppe Minervini or Yuliia
Siurkel. Strategies for writing the literature review Find a focus. It provides an overview of current
knowledge, allowing you to identify relevant theories, methods, and gaps in the existing research.
However, with modern technological advancements, especially social media, bullying has evolved
into cyberbullying. Is there any detailed template, additional to this. Studies were included if they
examined consumers’ preference for food naturalness and contained empirical data. What types of
sources (books, journal articles, websites). Teams Enable groups of users to work together to
streamline your digital publishing. Similarly the two main objectives of a literature review are firstly
the content covering existing research, theories and evidence, and secondly your own critical
evaluation and discussion of this content. There are numerous ways to find relevant literature, but
I’ll cover my top four tactics here. Literature reviews can also “stand alone” as separate articles by
themselves. Let’s do a quick recap of the key takeaways: It is essential to understand the WHY of
the literature review before you read or write anything. Therefore, it’s important to carefully think
about how you will organise your discussion to present it in a clear way. The RRL format in the
Chicago style is as follows: Author-date. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 17th European
Conference on Information Systems ( ecis 2009); Verona, Italy. 2009. Webster J., Watson R.T.
Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. A literature review, like a
term paper, is usually organized around ideas, not the sources themselves as an annotated
bibliography would be organized. It can be helpful to make an annotated bibliography, where you
compile full citation information and write a paragraph of summary and analysis for each source.
Ethics and dissemination No ethical approval is required for this study. Thematic reviews are
organized around a topic or issue, rather than the progression of time, although the progression of
time may still be incorporated into a thematic review. An RRL includes 3 main components: A short
overview and critique of the previous research. Fill out the form, provide task specifications, and get
an overview compliant with them. You Might Also Like: 37 Comments Thank you very much. You
can argue for the relevance of a specific theoretical approach or combine various theorical concepts
to create a framework for your research. Or the review might focus on the fundraising impact of the
Internet on a particular political party. What are the strengths and weaknesses of the research. This
form of review is known as qualitative systematic review. For example, a thematic map may not
require assessment of individual studies—a brief statement of the generic limitations of the set of
studies may be sufficient. What are the key concepts and how are they defined.
In these cases, systematic reviews can use qualitative synthesis methods such as vote counting,
content analysis, classification schemes and tabulations, as an alternative approach to narratively
synthesize the results of the independent studies included in the review. Literature reviews are a
collection of the most relevant and significant publications regarding that topic in order to provide a
comprehensive look at what has been said on the topic and by whom. Each kind has its special
purpose and particularities. I’m asked to do conceptual, theoretical and empirical literature, and i just
don’t know how to structure it Submit a Comment Cancel reply Your email address will not be
published. Identify areas of prior scholarship to prevent duplication of effort. If you have identified
some recurring themes in the literature, you can divide your RRL into sections that address various
aspects of the topic. Give your interpretation of how and why certain developments occurred (as
mentioned previously, this may not be appropriate in your discipline — check with a teacher or
mentor if you’re unsure). This is exactly what I was looking for and helps a lot together with your
previous post on literature review. The exact keywords can be extended to widen your research over
other databases and academic search engines like: Google Scholar Microsoft Academic Science.gov
Besides, it is not advisable to go through every resource word by word. Don’t be afraid to do more
research if you discover a new thread as you’re writing. In these cases, systematic reviews can use
qualitative synthesis methods such as vote counting, content analysis, classification schemes and
tabulations, as an alternative approach to narratively synthesize the results of the independent studies
included in the review. At this stage, it’s common to feel a bit of writer’s block and find yourself
procrastinating under the pressure of finally having to put something on paper. You will often see the
terms “the research,” “the scholarship,” and “the literature” used mostly interchangeably. By anti-
feminist, I refer here to an anti-woman perspective (a position in which women are regarded as
inferior or are to be feared), or perhaps, better, a misogynistic interpretive mode. Reading at
university The Academic writing page suggests ways to organise and structure information from a
range of sources and how you can develop your argument as you read and write. The specific goals
were to investigate how outcomes are produced and, most importantly, how variations in outcomes
can be explained. Pivotal publications: are there any influential theories or studies that changed the
direction of the field. A review of related literature about cyberbullying is another interesting option.
It’s achievable with writers who have gained a PhD themselves. You might argue for the relevance of
a specific theoretical approach, or combine various theoretical concepts to create a framework for
your research. Final tips on how to write a literature review A massive chunk of time and effort is
required to write a good literature review. A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources on a
specific topic. Right? Wrong! The “literature” of a literature review refers to any collection of
materials on a topic, not necessarily the great literary texts of the world. “Literature” could be
anything from a set of government pamphlets on British colonial methods in Africa to scholarly
articles on the treatment of a torn ACL. Instead, researchers often present studies that are
representative of most works published in a particular area and they consider a specific time frame to
be mapped. However, I am thoroughly satisfied with the work of expert. The population’s age
categories are also a drawback because they are extremely diverse and do not take age into account
as a confounding factor. Methodological Literature Review A methodological literature review
differs from the preceding ones in that it usually doesn’t focus on the sources’ content. When you’ve
finished writing and revising your literature review, don’t forget to proofread thoroughly before
submitting. Help us by pasting the URL of some good “literature review” for better understanding. In
their systematic review, Sinha and Warfa 16 found minority ethnic individuals in the UK and the
USA were less likely to seek and receive ED treatment as well as less frequently diagnosed and
referred to specialist ED services.
Goals of Literature Reviews What are the goals of creating a Literature Review. You can organize
your paragraphs with these 3 elements: Claim. You likely won’t be able to read absolutely everything
that has been written on your topic, so it will be necessary to evaluate which sources are most
relevant to your research question. Literature reviews help “set the stage” for later reading about new
research on a given topic (such as if they are placed in the Introduction of a larger research paper).
How to write review of related literature in research. Take notes and cite your sources As you read,
you should also begin the writing process. Then, content is checked with advanced plagiarism
detection tools to ensure a 100% Turnitin pass. Does the research use established frameworks or take
an innovative approach. Diagnosis and treatment of temporomandibular disorders. On the other
hand, the writing professional will present original conclusions based on the already conducted
research. More Features Connections Canva Create professional content with Canva, including
presentations, catalogs, and more. An example of this approach in the eHealth domain is offered by
DeShazo, Lavallie, and Wolf (2009). Clin Oral Investig. 2004;8(2). Krifka S, Petzel C, Bolay C,
Hiller KA, Spagnuolo G, Schmalz G, et al. Convey it to your reader A literature review may not
have a traditional thesis statement (one that makes an argument), but you do need to tell readers
what to expect. Themes: what questions or concepts recur across the literature. Naturally, you won’t
always follow the plan to the letter, but without a detailed outline, you’re more than likely going to
end up with a disjointed pile of waffle, and then you’re going to spend a far greater amount of time
re-writing, hacking and patching. This exercise requires a significant investment on the part of
researchers, who must ensure enhanced objectivity and avoid biases or mistakes. If the cited
information takes several pages, you need to include all the page numbers. Ethics declarations Ethics
approval and consent to participate. Methodological If you draw your sources from different
disciplines or fields that use a variety of research methods, you might want to compare the results
and conclusions that emerge from different approaches. It is a process of reviewing the literature, as
well as a form of writing. For example: Look at what results have emerged in qualitative versus
quantitative research Discuss how the topic has been approached by empirical versus theoretical
scholarship Divide the literature into sociological, historical, and cultural sources Theoretical A
literature review is often the foundation for a theoretical framework. Depending on the stage at
which your paper is at, this may involve merging your literature review into a partially complete
Introduction section, writing the rest of the paper around the literature review, or other processes.
Among the painful TMD of muscular origin, the most frequent is myofascial pain (MP). Ethics and
dissemination No ethical approval is required for this study. The most interesting literature reviews
are often written as arguments (again, as mentioned at the beginning of the page, this is discipline-
specific and doesn’t work for all situations). Studies in which no clinical data and complex
interventions were excluded. Final tips on how to write a literature review A massive chunk of time
and effort is required to write a good literature review. It can be undertaken as stand-alone projects
in their own right, or as a precursor to a systematic review. Literature reviews are a collection of the
most relevant and significant publications regarding that topic in order to provide a comprehensive
look at what has been said on the topic and by whom.
Sometimes their Acts lead to events or events cause. Effectiveness of mobilisation of the upper
cervical region and craniocervical flexor training on orofacial pain, mandibular function and
headache in women with TMD. All RCTs of acupuncture for TMD were searched without language
restrictions. We revise these tips periodically and welcome feedback. Also, make sure to include
opposing views (and not just supporting evidence). The aim of this article was to assess the clinical
evidence for acupuncture and laser acupuncture therapies as treatment for temporomandibular joint
disorder (TMD). As a result, nowadays, teenagers and adults cannot flee their bullies, which makes
them feel lonely and helpless. The Writing Center. University of North Carolina; Onwuegbuzie,
Anthony J. Writing the body In the body, you should: Group research studies and other types of
literature (reviews, theoretical articles, case studies, etc.) according to common denominators such
as qualitative versus quantitative approaches, conclusions of authors, specific purpose or objective,
chronology, etc. Preparing Literature Reviews Illustrates all the steps in preparing qualitative and
quantitative literature reviews. Instead, it is concerned with the research methods. Then, more
thorough research is needed to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that acupuncture is beneficial for
this reason. For example: Look at what results have emerged in qualitative versus quantitative
research Discuss how the topic has been approached by empirical versus theoretical scholarship
Divide the literature into sociological, historical, and cultural sources Theoretical A literature review
is often the foundation for a theoretical framework. Next, validity characterizes the degree to which
the review process was conducted appropriately. Searching for eligible studies using multiple
databases and information sources, including grey literature sources, without any language
restrictions. The focus of a literature review, however, is to summarize and synthesize the arguments
and ideas of others without adding new contributions. Acts: Study, Examine, Design, Produce,
Develop, Maintain, Defend, Critique, Argue, Debate, Illustrate. You have now created a draft of a
Short Literature Review. For example, if your research paper is describing an experiment on fear
conditioning, then you will probably need to provide an overview of prior research on fear
conditioning. A literature or narrative review is a comprehensive review and analysis of the
published literature on a specific topic or research question. In addressing these points, you argue for
your place in the conversation, which tends to make the lit review more compelling than a simple
reporting of other sources. Relevant literature will also be identified from the reference lists of
included studies. The purpose is to place research in a historical context to show familiarity with
state-of-the-art developments and to identify the likely directions for future research. So Nature
asked editors and working scientists with well-cited reviews for their tips. The literature represents
background and research developments related to a specific research question, interpreted and
analyzed by you in a synthesized way. Here are several strategies you can utilize to assess whether
you've thoroughly reviewed the literature: Look for repeating patterns in the research findings. A
review may be a self-contained unit — an end in itself — or a preface to and rationale for engaging
in primary research. Randomized clinical trial of acupuncture for myofascial pain of the jaw muscles.
Effectiveness and safety of acupuncture for migraine: an overview of systematic reviews. Paper
presented at the Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Information Systems ( ecis 2009);
Verona, Italy. 2009. Webster J., Watson R.T. Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a
literature review.
In the preceding example, Falk and Mills either directly refer in the text to the author of their source,
such as Hamilton, or they provide ample notation in the text when the ideas they are mentioning are
not their own, for example, Gastil’s. Focus on the literature related to your research topic. Doing
Your Literature Review: Traditional and Systematic Techniques. If you identified a research gap in
the reviewed literature, your conclusion could explain why that gap is significant. Two members of
the research team selected the articles using a pre-established list of inclusion and exclusion criteria
and following a two-step procedure. Identify areas of prior scholarship to prevent duplication of
effort. Thank you, for helping us keep this platform clean. Additional information specific to our
research questions will also be extracted. Literature Review Structure Example The majority of
literature reviews follow a standard introduction-body-conclusion structure. Identify the gaps in the
literature and show how your research links to these. Create an organizational method to focus this
section even further. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(14):7977. Article PubMed PubMed Central Google
Scholar Tortora C, Di Paola A, Argenziano M, Creoli M, Marrapodi MM, Cenni S, et al. There is no
preconceived plan to systematically review all of the literature although this can be done. In contrast,
less rich studies may itemise themes with an occasional indicative text extract and tend to summarise
findings. The overall ranking showed no studies with low risk of bias. Fullscreen Sharing Deliver a
distraction-free reading experience with a simple link. Supplemental material The search results for
each database will be documented and references will be imported into the citation management
system EndNote, where duplicates will be removed before studies are screened for inclusion.
Finding Literature Reviews A literature review is both a process and a product. To learn more about
literature reviews, take a look at our workshop on Writing Literature Reviews of Published Research.
You should always look at examples from your own discipline and talk to professors or mentors in
your field to be sure you understand your discipline’s conventions, for literature reviews as well as
for any other genre. Adobe InDesign Design pixel-perfect content like flyers, magazines and more
with Adobe InDesign. The literature review usually comes near the beginning of your thesis or
dissertation. As another methodological contribution, vom Brocke et al. (2009) offered a series of
guidelines for conducting literature reviews, with a particular focus on how to search and extract the
relevant body of knowledge. In the act of research and writing the literature review, the writer gains
expertise on the topic. A chronological compilation of studies The reason for conducting a literature
review is to: Literature Reviews: An Overview for Graduate Students While this 9-minute video
from NCSU is geared toward graduate students, it is useful for anyone conducting a literature
review. Identify relevant literature: The first and foremost step to conduct an RRL is to identify
relevant literature. There are multiple approaches to deciding how many sources to include in a
literature review section. HOW THIS STUDY MIGHT AFFECT RESEARCH, PRACTICE OR
POLICY This paper offers guidance for researchers when conducting a rapid QES and informs
commissioners of research and policy-makers what to expect when commissioning such a review.
The authors then extracted data from the selected articles and created several tables, one for each
outcome category. You don’t want to substitute a thorough review of core research literature in your
discipline for studies conducted in other fields of study.
In the present context, the notion of rigour refers to the reliability and validity of the review process
described in section 9.2. For one thing, reliability is related to the reproducibility of the review
process and steps, which is facilitated by a comprehensive documentation of the literature search
process, extraction, coding and analysis performed in the review. Climate change is one of the most
important issues nowadays. If your review type is absent from the service list on the order page,
choose the “Other” option. Our Resource List of study skills guides includes sections on
Referencing, Dissertation and project writing and Literature reviews. Stage 3: selecting studies The
process of selecting studies will consist of two stages: (1) title and abstract screening and (2) full-text
screening. The similarity score of your literature overview will be low if you use our writing service.
What are the strengths and weaknesses of the research. Teachers’ attitudes have not been emphasized
in the. So not wanting to bother on the minutae. Thank you. You’re most welcome, Renee. Where
plentiful reviews already exist, a team may decide to conduct a review of reviews 5 by including
multiple QES within a mega-synthesis 28 29 ( table 2, item R6). For example: Look at what results
have emerged in qualitative versus quantitative research Discuss how the topic has been approached
by empirical versus theoretical scholarship Divide the literature into sociological, historical, and
cultural sources Theoretical A literature review is often the foundation for a theoretical framework.
Any changes made and the rationale for doing so will be reported in final scoping review findings.
The Editing and proofreading page includes tips on how to do this and strategies for standing back
and thinking about your structure and checking the flow of your argument. The team seeks to align
the review question and the requirements of the knowledge user with available time and resources. If
you want to work smart, you don't want to miss this. A literature review I am currently working on,
for example, explores. The literature that is reviewed contains: books, articles, academic articles,
conference proceedings, association papers, and dissertations. Be sure to use terminology familiar to
your audience; get rid of unnecessary jargon or slang. For more information, please see our handout
on plagiarism. The sources support what Falk and Mills are saying. London: Pearson. You may
reproduce it for non-commercial use if you use the entire handout and attribute the source: The
Writing Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Make a Gift University of Texas
Libraries Literature Reviews What is a literature review. Debates, conflicts and contradictions:
where do sources disagree. Acupuncture for temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review. Use
these successful examples as a starting point for understanding how other writers have approached
the challenging and important task of situating their idea in the context of established research. How
does the publication relate to other literature in the field. Rather than just being an exhaustive list of
all that. The theoretical literature review helps to establish what theories already exist, the
relationships between them, to what degree the existing theories have been investigated, and to
develop new hypotheses to be tested. Systematic reviews that involve the rigorous application of
scientific strategies aimed at limiting subjectivity and bias (i.e., systematic and random errors) can
respond to this challenge. For example, in the case of narrative reviews, there is greater flexibility in
searching and synthesizing articles ( Green et al., 2006 ). Researchers are often relatively free to use
a diversity of approaches to search, identify, and select relevant scientific articles, describe their
operational characteristics, present how the individual studies fit together, and formulate conclusions.
An example of this approach in the eHealth domain is offered by DeShazo, Lavallie, and Wolf
(2009).
With my undergraduate research students (who tend to conduct small-scale qualitative studies ), I
encourage them to conduct a narrative literature review whereby they can identify key themes in the
literature. You can use it to discuss various theories, models, and definitions of key concepts. Sample
1 (PDF) A brief literature review within a political scientists’ National Science Foundation Graduate
Research Fellowship grant Sample 2 (PDF) A several-page literature review at the beginning of a
published, academic article about philosophy Sample 3 (PDF) A brief literature review at the
beginning of a published, academic article about photochemistry Academic and Professional Writing
This is an accordion element with a series of buttons that open and close related content panels.
Option 3: Methodological The methodological option is a way of structuring your literature review
by the research methodologies used. More Features Connections Canva Create professional content
with Canva, including presentations, catalogs, and more. In the conclusion, you should summarise
the key findings you have taken from the literature and emphasise their significance. It is always
good to have a condensed summary that is self-contained and independent of the rest of your
review. Education Literature Review Example For your education studies, you can write a review of
related literature about academic performance to determine factors that affect student achievement
and highlight research gaps. By combining information from all relevant studies, meta-analysis can
provide more precise estimates of the effects than those derived from the individual studies included
within a review. Are you going to use a chronological or other type of organizational structure. The
literature review chapter of your dissertation, thesis or research project is where you synthesise this
prior work and lay the theoretical foundation for your own research. Identifying Gaps: Aims to
pinpoint areas where there is a lack of research or unresolved questions, highlighting opportunities
for further investigation. You can choose the intellectual lineage you would like to be part of and
whose definitions matter most to your thinking (mostly humanities-specific, but this goes for
sciences as well). The PCI DSS standard protects quick and smooth transactions. Problem:
Interpreting Sources is not simply summary. Do not forget to invert authors’ names (the last name
should come first) and include the full titles of journals instead of their abbreviations. Get the
structure of your literature review chapter wrong and you’ll struggle to achieve these objectives.
Hart, Chris. Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination. But it
can be feasibly done through following a structured approach to data collection and analysis. This
means drawing connections between sources to create a picture of the scholarly conversation on a
topic over time. Well, there are (at least) four core functions: For you to gain an understanding (and
demonstrate this understanding) of where the research is at currently, what the key arguments and
disagreements are. Although clearly rooted in academic research - Harris teaches in the Geography
department at York University - this book is nevertheless a mostly accessible read that's as much a
narrative of Toronto via its various fictions as it is an analysis of the dominant tropes and themes that
underwrite local literary tradition. Periodically, UT Libraries runs a workshop covering the basics
and library support for literature reviews. Importantly, low usage has been listed as one of the
underlying causes. However, the main conclusion obtained from that meta-analysis was that the
methodologic quality of the studies analyzed required more evidence. In this comprehensive guide,
we will explore everything from the definition of a literature review, its appropriate length, various
types of literature reviews, and how to write one. Video Say more by seamlessly including video
within your publication. A literature review is an integrated analysis -- not just a summary-- of
scholarly writings and other relevant evidence related directly to your research question. Select the
plagiarism report if you feel you need it to prove the service quality. Similarities and differences
between past studies and the current one.