Ece Trans Wp15 Ac1 07 Ge Inf50e
Ece Trans Wp15 Ac1 07 Ge Inf50e
Ece Trans Wp15 Ac1 07 Ge Inf50e
50
Pending issues
SUMMARY
Executive summary: The document 2007/48 from the United Kingdom contains a
proposal to adopt a modification of the type B bodies into the
RID/ADR.
Part 1
The United Kingdom has in document 2007/48 supported the principle that type C bodies are
not included in the Directive 99/36/EC (TPED) and should therefore be deleted from the
RID/ADR, which is fully in line with document 2007/46 from Sweden which makes us very
pleased.
The document 2007/48 from the UK also contains a proposal to adopt a modification of the
description of bodies of type B into the RID/ADR.
Sweden would like to draw the attention of Joint Meeting, to that there exist an international
covering guidance document on the application of the standard EN ISO/IEC 17020:2004.
In this guidance document the different types of bodies are described in part 4, please see
Annex 1.
The Guidance document ILAC/IAF A4: Guidance on the Application of ISO/IEC 17020, is
accepted by the: European Co-operation for Accreditations (EA), International Laboratory
Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC) and International Accreditation Forum, Inc (IAF).
Since the standard EN ISO/IEC 17020:2004 and the developed guidance document ILAC/IAF
A4 is accepted and applied in the rest of the world and in all other industrial areas performing
inspection, Sweden finds the proposal from United Kingdom very inappropriate.
The only logical action to take in this question is to adopt and use the existing international
accepted definitions.
If the proposal from the UK is adopted into the RID/ADR, the RID/ADR will have a unique
type of inspection body deviating from the rest of the world.
This modified inspection body will not fulfil the requirements of EN ISO/IEC 17020:2004 as
a body of type B.
But it will correspond with the requirements of the type C body according to EN ISO/IEC
17020:2004. The type C bodies are not included in the TPED.
Part 2
As the UK have illustrated, there are differences between the texts in TPED and EN ISO/IEC
17020:2004 (which is a carbon copy of the earlier EN 45004:1995) for the type B bodies.
We would like to point out that these differences also exist in Annex I (Minimum criteria to
be met by notified or approved bodies) and Annex II (Supplementary Criteria to be met by
Notified Bodies) of the TPED compared with the text in the standard EN ISO/IEC
17020:2004.
In Annex II to this informal document a broader table comparing the Annex I, II and III of the
TPED with the standard EN ISO/IEC 17020:2004 is presented. (In 2007/48 only Annex II is
compared with standard EN ISO/IEC 17020:2004.)
INF.50
page 3
The European Commission submitted on 9 January 1997 The Proposal for a Council
Directive on transportable pressure equipment (97/C95/02) COM(96) 674 final -
97/0011(SYN). This proposal comprised the type C bodies, which later were removed by the
Council; please see INF.4 to this Joint Meeting. In the text of the proposal it is clearer how the
Commission pointed out these three types of bodies.
In Annex III to this informal document the differences between the Commissions proposal
from 9 January 1997 and the adopted TPED are illustrated.
Part 3
Under point 9 (a) and (b) in document 2007/48, the UK have described problems with bodies
not conforming to type B.
If these bodies form a demonstrably separate and identifiable part of an organisation, which
should be possible to achieve without considerable problems and another part of the
organisation is involved in the design, manufacture, supply, installation, use or maintenance
of items that they inspect, for example filling of the pressure receptacle, the inspection body
should be able to conform to type B and also be in line with the Guidance document
ILAC/IAF A4, see first part of 4.2.2a also inserted below.
Justification
Please see ECE/TRANS/WP.15/AC.1/2007/46.
Proposal
Please see ECE/TRANS/WP.15/AC.1/2007/46 as this is only an informal document.
INF.50
page 4
Annex I
This information comes from the EA, European Co-operation for Accreditations webpage,
http://www.european-accreditation.org. On their webpage a number of publications are to be
found and they are categorised to give an indication on how to apply the document.
The Category 2 is the EA MLA support documents. EA MLA support documents are
documents of a horizontal nature that support the application of the standards used for
accreditation. These documents must be implemented by EA member accreditation bodies for
use in their accreditation systems. Their implementation will be assessed as part of the EA
MLA peer evaluation process. At
http://www.european-accreditation.org/content/publications/pub.htm the Application
documents for Inspection Series 5 is to be found.
The document EA 5/01 (rev03) Category 2 has been withdrawn. The EA Guidance on the
Application on the EN 45004 is replaced by ILAC/IAF A4: Guidance on the Application of
ISO/IEC 17020. Please download the document at www.ilac.org or at iaf.nu.
The following text is from the IAF/ILAC-A4:2004, Guidance on the Application of ISO/IEC
17020.
4.1a Procedures should be documented to assure inspection body staff are free from
commercial, financial or other pressures which might affect their judgement.
The Chief Executive of the legal entity of which the Inspection Body is
a part shall define and document its policy for maintaining the Type A
status of the Inspection Body. The Accreditation Body will examine the
evidence of implementation of this policy in respect of ownership
interests, constitution of board of directors, means of financing,
decision making methods and other such factors that may have an
influence on the impartiality, independence and integrity of a Type A
Inspection Body.
A Type C inspection body may offer its inspection service on the open
market or to any other party and supply inspection service to external
organisations. For example, it may inspect products supplied by it or by
its parent organisation and used by another organisation. It may also
supply other organisations with inspection of items that are similar to
those designed, manufactured, supplied, installed, used or maintained
by it or by its parent organisation, and which may therefore be regarded
as competitive.
There are differences in the annexes of the TPED compared with the text in the EN ISO/IEC
17020:2004 not only in Annex III regarding the approved bodies (type B). See the following
table, which covers Annex I, II and III of the TPED.
8.1
In order to guarantee a high level of safety The inspection body shall have a sufficient
the inspection body must be in a position to numbers of permanent personnel with the
provide expertise in the field of safety of range of expertise to carry out its normal
transportable pressure equipment. functions.
8.1
They must also have the ability required to The inspection body shall have a sufficient
draw up the certificates, records and reports numbers of permanent personnel with the
to demonstrate that the inspections have range of expertise to carry out its normal
been carried out. functions.
5. 8.2 (third sentence)
They must also have relevant knowledge of They shall also have relevant knowledge of
the technology used for the manufacturing the technology used for the manufacturing
of the transportable pressure equipment, of the products inspected, of the way in
including accessories, which they inspect, of which products or processes submitted to
the way in which the equipment submitted their inspections are used or are intended to
to their inspections is used or is intended to be used, and of the defects which may occur
be used, and of the defects which may occur during use or in service.
during use or in service.
6. 8.1
The inspection body and its staff must carry The inspection body shall have a sufficient
out the assessments and verifications with numbers of permanent personnel with the
the highest degree of professional integrity range of expertise to carry out its normal
and technical competence. functions.
5
The inspection body must ensure the The inspection body shall ensure
confidentiality of information obtained in confidentiality of information obtained in
the course of its inspection activities. the course of its inspection activities.
9. 14.1
The inspection body must itself normally The inspection body shall itself normally
perform the inspections which it contracts to perform the inspections which it contracts to
undertake. undertake.
14.2
When a inspection body sub-contracts any When an inspection body subcontracts any
part of the inspection, it must ensure and be part of the inspection, it shall ensure and be
able to demonstrate that its sub-contractor is able to demonstrate that its subcontractor is
competent to perform the service in question competent to perform the service in question
and must take full responsibility for that and where applicable complies with the
sub-contracting. criteria stipulated in the relevant standard of
the EN 45000 series. The subcontractor shall
be acceptable to the client.
TPED Annex II: Supplementary Criteria Requirements in ISO 17020 for Type A
to be met by Notified Bodies referred to in bodies;
Article 8 Clause 4.2.1 and Annex A
1. 4.2.1
A notified body must be independent of the The inspection body providing “third party”
parties involved and therefore provide ‘third shall meet the criteria of annex A
party’ inspection services. (normative).
A.1
The inspection body shall be independent of
the parties involved.
The notified body and its staff responsible The notified body, and its staff responsible
for carrying out the inspection must not be for carrying out the inspection shall not be
the designer, manufacturer, supplier, the designer, manufacturer, supplier,
purchaser, owner, holder, user or maintainer installer, purchaser, owner, user or
of the transportable pressure equipment, maintainer of the items which they inspect,
including accessories, which that body nor the authorised representative of any of
inspects, nor the authorised representative of these parties.
any of these parties.
A2.
They must not be directly involved in the The inspection body and its staff shall not
design, manufacture, marketing or engage in any activities that may conflict
maintenance of the transportable pressure with their independence of judgement and
equipment, including accessories, nor integrity in relation to their inspections
represent the parties engaged in these activities.
activities.
In particular they shall not become directly
involved in the design, manufacture, supply,
installation, use or maintenance of the items
inspected, or similar competitive items.
The following text shows the existing TPED compared with “The Proposal for a Council
Directive on transportable pressure equipment” submitted by the European Commission on 9
January 1997.
The COMMON POSITION adopted by the Council on the 30 November 1998 deleted bodies
of type C.