Sea Water
Sea Water
Sea Water
Screening
The Cooling Water Intake at Ventanas Power Station used as a case study (1)
Vs.
overall performance of the American Eco Systems Elmosa Seawater Intake System
is higher than that of any other systems operating in the water intake industry
including mechanical screening systems. Since the Elmosa InvisiHead system by
design and nature of operation is proactive, it utilizes the natural processes in its
entire operation from the start to the end – from the point where the first water
molecule at the offshore end of the system is drawn in to the downstream end of the
pump bays or NatSep intake basin onshore where that molecule is transferred to the
seawater pump suction bell. The molecule –not associated with any supended
material - is gently drawn in to the InvisiHead and smoothly guided through all the
way to the pump intake at the intake basin. Hence, the need to react to a debris
problem carried in through the water intake system is eliminated and thus the need
for reactive O&M-intensive screening systems is eliminated. This high degree of
performance of the InvisiHead system is also demonstrated when it operates as a
marine outfall to discharge, disperse, mix and dilute effluents to attain local
conditions within the vicinity of the InvisiHead diffuser. In contrast, mechanical
screening has to be supported by a costly O&M-intensive effort as show below to
keep it in operation.
Figure-3: The complete elmosa intake system: InvisiHead, EVE intake line, gravety NatSep; zero
moving parts, zero spareparts for life; meets and exceeds local environmental regulations
Figure-5: InvisiHead can be installed under and supported by loading docks, jetties, and offshore platforms
Figure-7: Sequential flow system: Far & Near Approach, Stabilization, Outlet, IH-Intake Pipe Interface
Figure-8: A closer look at the O&M-free InvisiHead flow management system with detailed flow
behavior in, to, and out
Fig-9: Just to remove debris the mechanical screening system can be complex
Figure-10: Sediment accumulation around pump mostly very fine to coarse sand and some algae
Technical Comparison: the InvisiHead versus the fixed and traveling Screens
Mechanical
Screening
Issue: Algae and Algae and debris The InvisiHead Intake System Stationary and
biota deposits Management Traveling
How is it resolved? How is it resolved?
Quintero Bay in Chie The far approach, near approach, inlet Using a
has an abundance of red and outlet flow veocities are all lower combination of
algae that enter and clog than the particle fall velocity of the advanced modern
the cooling water intake debris, therefore it will not be sucked fixed and traveling
systems at Ventanas in by the super weak out of phase screens could
power plant. The algae suction forces generated by the remove the design
grow in the bay and onshore seawater intake pumps. These size of debris and
consist of Gracilaria suction forces are as week as 0.017 larger-Figures 2
chilensis (Pellilo) and Gracilaria chilensis, Pellilo millibar – Fig. 7. and 6.
Ceramium rubrum
(banded red weed) are the
primary aquatic
vegetation as the primary
source of debris which
passes over and through
the screens and plug the
condenser tubes
180 cubic meters of fine Since it utelizes the natural The use of all types
to coarse sediment phenomena in its flow management, of screening
accumulated around the InvisiHead uses local marine systems may reduce
pump in one year currents to flush marine life, debris or eliminate flow of
and sediment out of its system and get algae but definitely
Ventanas experiences back into the ambiant again. The will not affect
operating and standard InvisiHead secifications call sediment transport
maintenance problems for an entrance veocity of 0.091m/s action. Use of
related to sediment and local currents to flush out debris dedicated sediment
entering the intakes. with fall velocity lower than 0.09m/s. removal equipment
Sediment accumulates 0.02m/s is the fall velocity of fine- was recommended.
up to one meter deep in very fine sand in the pile shown in
the screen/pump bays at Fig.10. No sufficient data is available
both Units: Unit1 and about current velocities in Quintero
Unit2. Sediment also Bay. In standard conditions of local
builds up in the marine currents one InvisiHead
condenser water boxes. system of 5.67m for Unit 1 and 1-
6.55m or 2-4.63m for unit 2 of the
Ventanas power plant to deliver the
required flow capacities unattended at
all times free of algae, debris, and
sediment. Due to the ack of sufficient
current data 0.02m/s woud be the
design criterion of the InvisiHead
entrance velocity for both units.
Units1 and Unit2 woud need a total of
11-5.5m InvisiHead systems to supply
the required capacities of clean water
free of sediment and algae.
Mechanical
Costs Sediment, Algae and
The InvisiHead Intake System
Screening
Debris Management Stationary and
Traveling
Total Sediment and Equipment: Equipment:
algae management
costs OPTION I: Total cost is at
Under standard conditions the about $11.3
entrance velocity is made at million
0.09m/s to use one-5.67m to
supply 45,000 GPM to Unit1 and
one-6.55m to supply 60,000 GPM Annual O&M:
to Unit2 $612,000
Both InvisiHead systems operating
under standard conditions to
supply cooling water free of algae
and sediment.
OPTION II:
But since no sufficient site data for
marine currents in Quintero Bay is
available supplying Unit1 with 5-
5.5m systems and Unit2 with 6-
5.5m systems using 0.02m/s as
the sizing criterion.