The Practical Biomechanics of Running
The Practical Biomechanics of Running
The Practical Biomechanics of Running
ROBERT S. ADELAAR,* MD
From the Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Virginia,
Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
Figure 1. Comparison of the phases of the walking and running cycle. The running gait cycle is different from walking because
of the increase in the double limb unsupported time or float phase, decrease in stance phase, and increase in swing phase.
the running surface.8 intrinsics of the foot which tend to be active throughout
The gluteus maximus and hamstring are active in the stance phase. Intrinsics coordinate hindfoot inversion with
walking cycle from the midstance to foot-off. In the running stabilization of the longitudinal arch and supination of the
cycle they increase their activity 30% to 50%9 to decelerate forefoot.1,4 This action is also assisted by the windlass action
the stance phase limb. The hip adductors stabilize the stance of the plantar fascia, which is really an extension of the
leg at ground contact. In the walking cycle they are active triceps surae muscle.
only from swing phase to midstance phase, but they are In the running cycle the center of gravity must pass over
active throughout the running cycle.9 the hindfoot in the stance phase, which requires a relative
The knee extensors are active in walking to control knee leg shortening. The shortening consists of knee flexion
flexion in swing phase and to initiate knee extension during against the quadricep resistance, ankle dorsiflexion, and
early stance phase. As a walker increases velocity, the quad- pronation of the foot, which allows depression of the longi-
ricep activity increases and as there is a greater arc of knee tudinal arch. During the acceleration phase, as the foot
motion needed to clear the foot from the ground. The comes off the ground, the limb must extend. Limb extension
strength and fatigue capacity of the quadricep is very im- adds to the thrust of the body as it propels itself into the
portant because of its prolonged activity in the running double unsupported limb phase of gait. The extension of the
cycle. knee in acceleration is resisted by the hamstrings. The
The foot and ankle intrinsics, plantar flexors, and pero- plantar flexors of the ankle and foot supinators are active
neals are important to stabilize the plantar surface and in this important phase of gait.4 The coordinated muscle
hindfoot during the foot-flat phase. This group assists plan- activity must interface with the complex ligament and bone
tar flexion at heel strike and resists a dorsiflexion group at architecture of the foot.
499
over the hindfoot. It has been noted that with increased heel
height there is an increase in plantar flexion and a decrease
in total motion.7, 10 As the velocity of gait increases, the peak
plantar flexion is reached faster with the same dorsiflexion.
The forces transmitted to the ankle on walking have been
found to be two times body weight. With an increase in gait
velocity, there is increased activity of the gastrocnemius
muscle, which increases ankle force up to five times body
weight in the late stance phase.
Subtalar
appreciated in the crease of a firm leather shoe. It is impor- Pronation allows the foot to distribute the energy of heel
tant in shoe fabrication to add semirigid constraints to the strike to the entire midfoot and forefoot. If pronation is
metatarsal break area for motion. limited, a great deal of the impact is transferred to the heel.
The normal force distribution for the plantar surface in Conditions which limit the mobility of the subtalar joint,
walking and jogging starts with lateral heel pressure at heel such as traumatic arthritis or peroneal spasm, also limit the
strike. The force is then transmitted up the lateral border ability of the plantar surface to adjust to uneven terrain.
of the foot to the metatarsals. The metatarsals then distrib- The subtalar joint acts to alter the plantar surface; through
ute the load, with the largest load going to the first metatar- its action the midfoot can maintain an even pressure on the
sal sesamoid complex. Disorders such as hallux valgus de- plantar surface. The person with restricted subtalar mobility
crease the amount of stress that the first metatarsal bears, has a difficult time walking on uneven surfaces.
due to the sesamoid rotation. Therefore, these stresses are In the orthotic management of foot and ankle, the impor-
transmitted to the adjacent metatarsal heads and transfer tance of the hindfoot cannot be minimized. To decrease the
stress lesions are created. There are also abnormalities in amount of pronation one tries to block the amount of
the metatarsal heads themselves, with an enlarged fibula eversion of the hindfoot with a medial based hindfoot or-
component to the condyle, which allow increased stress on thosis and longitudinal arch. The height of the heel is also
certain metatarsal heads during the walking process. important because it determines the amount of plantar
flexion the ankle goes through at heel strike.10 Increasing
Plantar fascia heel pad height decreases plantar flexion, but does not alter
the dorsiflexion.
The plantar fascia forms a passive restraint originating from It is also important to maintain a flexible gastrocsoleus
its gastrocnemius extension at the medial tubercle of the os complex.’2 Tightness of the gastrocsoleus alters the way the
calcis. It inserts around the metatarsal heads to the proximal body can move over the center of gravity of the hindfoot
phalanges. This structure helps stabilize the longitudinal during stance phase. It decreases the amount of dorsiflexion
arch and acts as a windlass. With increased tension in the which is also necessary for clearance of the foot, and thus
structure, the longitudinal arch is stabilized. Increased tight- increases the activity of the knee musculature to increase
ness causes increased flexion in the toes. With elongation flexion. Stretching and flexibility of the gastrocsoleus and
of the toes, the plantar fascia flatten onto the ground and hamstring should be an important component of rehabili-
pronation of the forefoot occurs. tation after injury. Muscle conditioning of the peroneals,
posterior tibialis, and intrinsic musculature is vital in main-
DISCUSSION taining a smooth stance phase and accelerating the limb at
foot-off. The peroneal musculature is also critical to lateral
ankle instability syndromes.
In order to analyze the muscle ligament and bone interac-
tions operating during the running cycle, one must assume
REFERENCES
a standard broad-based gait with a heel to forefoot force
distribution. There are many variations of the gait cycle; for 1. Steindler A: Mechanisms of the foot and ankle, in Kinesiology of Human
Body Under Normal and Abnormal Conditions. Spnngfield, IL, Charles C
example, the crossover stride, when one foot extends beyond Thomas, 1955, pp 373-395
the midline each time the heel strikes. When this occurs 2. Mann RA. Surgical implication of biomechanics of the foot and ankle. Clin
there is increased varus torque on the heel. There are also Orthop 146: 111-118, 1980
3. Hicks JH: Three weight bearing mechanisms of the foot, in Evans EG (ed):
runners like Bill Rogers, who run on their forefeet with very Biomechanical Study of Musculoskeletal System. Spnngfield, IL, Charles
little heel strike. 11 C Thomas, 1961, pp 161-191
4 Mann RA: Biomechanics of foot and ankle, in Surgery of Foot. St Louis,
In the running cycle at heel strike, the tibia is internally
CV Mosby Co, 1986, pp 1-30
rotating. The hindfoot is initially everted, which allows, 5. Slocum DB, James SL. Classification of running gait, in AAOS Symposium
through the subtalar mechanism, an unlocking of the trans- of Sports Medicine. St. Louis, CV Mosby Co, 1969, pp 105-110
6 Sammarco J: Biomechanics of the foot, in Frankel VH (ed): Basic Biome-
verse tarsal joints of the calcaneal-cuboid and talonavicular
chanics of Skeletal Systems. Philadelphia, Lea & Febiger, 1980, pp 193-
joint. The transverse tarsal joints are parallel. This allows 220
7. Scranton PE Jr, Rutkowski R, Browne TD: Support phase kinematics of
pronation, the movement of the bones of the midfoot as the the foot, in Boreman JE (ed): The Foot and Ankle. New York, Grune &
longitudinal arch depresses. Pronation is a normal motion Stratton 1980, pp 186-194
which is governed by the position of the hindfoot, mobility 8. Inman VT: Human Walking. Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins, 1981, pp 1-148
of the subtalar joint, and the configuration of the bones of 9. Mann RA: Biomechanics of running, in AAOS Symposium on the Foot and
Leg in Running Sports. St. Louis, CV Mosby Co, 1982, pp 30-44
the midfoot. The plantar fascia also acts as a vital restraint, 10. Stauffer DN, Chao EYS, Henderson WA: Force and motion analysis of the
tightening to limit the amount that the longitudinal arch normal, diseased and prosthetic ankle joint. Clin Orthop 127: 184-196,
1977
can depress. 11. Cavanagh PR: The shoe ground interface in running, in AAOS Symposium
Alterations in the subtalar joint and hindfoot can have a on the Foot and Leg in Running Sports. St. Louis, CV Mosby Co, 1982, pp
30-44
significant effect on the running cycle. The varus hindfoot, 12. Waller JR Jr: Biomechanics and rehabilitation of the gastroc-soleus com-
as in a cavo varus foot, would decrease the amount of motion
plex, in AAOS Symposium on the Foot and Leg in Running Sports. St.
at the midfoot and thus decrease the amount of pronation. Louis, CV Mosby Co, 1982, pp 86-91