Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Stateof Implementationof Senior High School Program An Explanatory Analysisof Administrativeand Instructional Practices

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 15

JPAIR Multidisciplinary Research

Vol. 30 · October 2017 JPAIR Multidisciplinary Research is produced


Print ISSN 2012-3981 • Online ISSN 2244-0445 by PAIR, an ISO 9001:2008 QMS certified
DOI:https://doi.org/10.7719/jpair.v30i1.558 by AJA Registrars, Inc.
Journal Impact: H Index = 3 from Publish or Perish

State of Implementation of Senior


High School Program: An Explanatory
Analysis of Administrative
and Instructional Practices
RIGETTE RYAN S. RAMOS
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3652-7942
rigetteryanramos@ymail.com
Telesforo and Natividad Alfonso High School, Pampanga, Philippines

Originality:100% • Grammar Check: 91% • Plagiarism: 0%

ABSTRACT

This study dealt to explore the administrative and instructional practices


associated with the implementation of the Senior High School Program in
the Division of Pampanga in aid of policy recommendation. It described how
administrators and teachers assess the level of readiness of schools; administrative
and instructional practices that are utilized; common problems and their coping
measures; significant insights and observations and the policy recommendation
that may be proposed. The study made use of the descriptive evaluation method
utilizing the Mixed Method Explanatory Sequential Design in data analyzing, for
the purposes of breadth and depth of understanding and corroboration. Based
on the results, the Division of Pampanga has the readiness to offer the program.
Administrators have been pursuing their administrative and instructional
functions. There are issues hindering implementation that need to be addressed.
Administrators and teachers are doing their very best to find solutions to their
encountered problems. The following are the recommendations; Administrators
may study the possibility of strategically aligning the local school board funds.
Administrators may continue the training, and supporting teachers to do action

138
International Peer Reviewed Journal

researches. Concerned schools may revisit the different ways and means on how
the problems can be solved.

Keywords – Education, Senior High School, Administrative and Instructional


Practices, mixed method research design, Philippines

INTRODUCTION

Education equips an individual with the necessary knowledge and skills he


needs to become a profitable member of a society. Undoubtedly education is
the most formidable instrument in reducing poverty, therefore, improving the
well-being of the people. However, to establish and maintain a high-quality
system, proper investment must be made. Indeed, the short duration of the basic
education system is also a disadvantage for the professionals and those who intend
to study abroad. Due to the insufficient achievement in the world’s standard
in having a 10-year curriculum, Filipino workers are perceived unrecognizable
as professionals. The Department of Education, therefore, strongly believes
that the K to 12 program will give every clientele the opportunity to receive
quality education based on a well-designed and decongested curriculum that is
internationally competitive.
In the past few years of the Philippine context, curriculum in the country
experienced drastic changes in adapting to the world’s demand. The government
offered the curriculum they think appropriate and fulfills the needs of its citizens.
Education remains the top priority. Despite the various developments, plans, and
projects created by the government, the quality of education still needs much
room for improvement (Ragasa, 2012).
The intention of K to 12 is not merely to add two years of schooling but
more importantly, to enhance the basic education curriculum. DepEd also noted
that the present ten-year curriculum is congested in which students are forced
to absorb all the knowledge and skills necessary in a short and limited span of
time. As a result, high school graduates are often unprepared for employment,
entrepreneurship, or even in higher education. The Department of Education on
its new program would like to create more mature senior high school students
that can be a functional member of the society.
Matthew (2012) explained the scope and purposes of secondary education in
SHS in Nigeria’s context which is provided for children after primary education,
that is, before tertiary education. They believed that developing a child better than

139
JPAIR Multidisciplinary Research

the primary level, because it is obvious that primary education is insufficient for
children to acquire different skills like the literacy, numeracy, and communication
skills. Such education is provided in secondary school, which can be owned by
government individuals or community.
Before K to 12, the Philippines was the last country in Asia and one of only
three countries worldwide with a ten-year basic education system. This means
that the country is left behind and needs progress in accordance with the world’s
trend. The K to 12 program is affirmed by the government as the solution to
the need in the job sectors in the country. In as much as the employment in
the Philippines is concerned, the K to12 education can also respond to the fact
that most countries in the world already have the same plan in their educational
institutions. With this, the standards of these countries will lift higher than what
the country has, creating a proliferation in the global competency (Tabora, 2014).
The implementation of the K to 12 basic education program in schools in
the Philippines is being done in phases, starting in the school year 2012-2013.
Students who were in Grade 7 were the first in the formal implementation to
undergo the enhanced secondary education program. In 2015, it was announced
that the DepEd was preparing for the implementation of SHS for the school year
2016-2017. All divisions of DepEd have finished planning and have figures on
enrollment a year in advance. Plans were actually reviewed by technical working
group, committees, and finalized upon conference with other stakeholders, which
involved: classrooms, teachers, textbooks and curriculum. Strategies were carried
out and examined by studying their pros and cons.
Dalumpines (2011) explained that the DepEd had started orienting its employees
for the first phase of the implementation of the K to 12 Basic Education Program.
According to DepEd, 171 of their employees from different central offices attended the
orientation on the features of the program and issues arising from its implementation.
The first phase of the new program started in school year 2011-2012, with the
implementation of the universal kindergarten program, with children entering
school as young as 5 years old. The K to 12 program includes kindergarten, six years of
elementary education, four years of junior high school, and two years of senior high
school. The two additional years in high school will be used for in-depth specialization
for students depending on the occupation or career track they wish to pursue.
DepEd explained that we need to add two more years to our basic education
curriculum so as to uplift the country’s standard of education. This program
will help the country to cope with the fast pace of globalization. The K to 12
program is part of President Benigno Simeon Aquino III’s 10-Point Education

140
International Peer Reviewed Journal

Agenda. After the implementation of the universal kindergarten program, Grade


1 students of school year 2012-2013 were first to undergo the 13-year basic
education program.
The study obtained empirical data on the state of implementation of the
Senior High School program in the Division of Pampanga. Specifically, on the
readiness of the schools to operate the program, bringing to fore the problems
encountered in program implementation in and of policy recommendations.

FRAMEWORK

This study drew a support from the Theory of Constructivism originally


postulated by Jean Piaget as cited by Stotsky (2008). This theory assumes that
motivation to learn is enhanced by the opportunity to choose what to learn
and how to learn it. This theory claims that what students learn must be self-
constructed from their own initiatives and experiences. Meaningful learning
is said to take place only when students can construct, with their peers, their
own understanding of the world they live in, whether from personal experience
or from the texts they choose to read. Constructivism is a learning theory that
compels students to “reinvent the wheel.” Students became engaged by applying
their existing knowledge and real-world experience, learning to hypothesize,
testing their theories, and ultimately drawing conclusions from their findings. In
fact, constructivism taps into and triggers the student’s innate curiosity about
the world and how things work. Students do not reinvent the wheel but, rather,
attempt to understand how it turns, how it functions.
Figure I shows the schematic diagram of the conceptual framework of
the study. It has three significant components: (a) the level of readiness of the
schools in the implementation of the SHS Program from the administrators’ and
teachers’ factors; (b) the common problems encountered in the implementation
of SHS program and (c) coping measures employed in addressing the issues and
problems; and (c) the proposed policy recommendation.

141
JPAIR Multidisciplinary Research

Figure 1. Schematic Diagram of the Study

OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

This study sought to explore the administrative and instructional practices


associated with the implementation of the Senior High School Program in the
Division of Pampanga in aid of policy recommendation.

METHODOLOGY
Research Design
This study made use of the descriptive-evaluative method in determining
the level of readiness of the administrators and teachers in implementing the
SHS program in their school. The method was deemed useful in assessing the
state of implementation of the Senior High School Program in the Division of
Pampanga.
This study also employed the Mixed Method Explanatory Sequential Design.
This research design combines the elements of quantitative and qualitative
research approaches for breadth and depth of understanding and corroboration.
The method also advances the systematic integration of quantitative and
qualitative data within a single investigation or sustained program of inquiry.
The basic premise of this methodology is that such integration permits a more

142
International Peer Reviewed Journal

complete and synergistic utilization of data than do separate quantitative and


qualitative data collection and analysis.

Participants
Quantitative Phase. The respondents of this study were the administrators
and teachers in public secondary schools in the Division of Pampanga offering
SHS Program for school year 2016-2017. The total population of the study was
84 public schools from the seven clusters according to its municipality. Using
the G Power test, a random sample of 21 was chosen representing 25 percent of
the target population. Schools per cluster were chosen using stratified – random
sampling design categorize as large, medium and small schools.
Qualitative Phase. The participants of the study were the seven administrators
from the seven clusters. One participant from each cluster was chosen using
non-probability purposive sampling to gather insights and observations on the
implementation of the SHS Program. The purpose of the interview is to gather
supporting facts that would justify the result of data.

Instruments
The researcher sought the assistance of seasoned educators and researchers
to validate the study. The questionnaire was later subjected to a pilot testing to
examine the readability of the instrument. The results were analyzed using the
Cronbach’s Alpha Test, and the result was a coefficient alpha of 0.88 indicating
that reliability of instrument.

Data Collection
Survey questionnaire was used extensively in the study. The first phase of
the study focused on descriptively analyzing the profile of the school offering
SHS regarding readiness in (i) physical facilities and infrastructures; (ii) teachers
training and preparations; (iii) curriculum materials and (iv) source of funds. It
also dealt with the administrative and instructional practices in implementing
the new program. Numeric data was the product of the first phase of the study.
Administrators were interviewed and given an open – ended questions to
know the problems they encountered in the implementation of the SHS program
and what strategies they used to solve the encountered problems. Text data were
the product of the second phase of the study.
Mixing of quantitative results and qualitative findings. The integration
of the results of the quantitative and the qualitative findings provided a better

143
JPAIR Multidisciplinary Research

understanding on what coping measures were employed to address these problems


that administrators and teachers encountered. This led the researcher an output
of policy recommendations based on the result of the study. Figure 2 shows the
theoretical scaffold method of the study.

Ethical Consideration
The researcher presented a formal letter and requested the permission to the
Schools Division Superintendent of the Division of Pampanga to administer the
instrument before employing the survey questionnaire. The anonymity of the
respondents was highly observed and their responses were treated with utmost
confidentiality to protect the interest and credibility of the schools.

Data Analysis
Quantitative Phase. Statistical Treatment of Data. The data gathered were
processed by a computer system using the SPSS program. The SPSS was used to
process the statistical data of variables that are in the strength of interval scale
in terms of readiness of the school in (i) physical facilities and infrastructures;
(ii) teachers training and preparations; (iii) curriculum materials and (iv) budget
requirements and the different instructional and administrative practices used in
the implementation of SHS program.
The following statistical tools were utilized in describing and analyzing the
results of the study:
1. Four points Likert scale procedure was utilized in presenting the profile
of the school offering SHS regarding readiness in physical facilities and
infrastructures, teachers training and preparations, curriculum materials
and budget requirements.
2. Mean, frequency counts, percentage and ranking procedures were used
analyzing the problems encountered by the administrators and teachers

Qualitative Phase. Qualitative Data Analysis. The procedure in this phase


was qualitative case study that dealt with the problems and coping measures of
the respondents. Theme development regarding assertions utilized as findings in
this phase.

144
International Peer Reviewed Journal

Figure 2. Theoretical Scaffold Method of the Study

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Level of Readiness of the Schools in the Implementation of the Senior


High School Program
A. Physical facilities and infrastructures. The overall assessment of the
administrators had a mean value of 2.74 and standard deviation of 1.14; while
the assessment of the teacher-respondents, was 2.55 and 1.12 for the mean
and standard deviation respectively with a descriptive equivalent of ready. The
computed t-ratio of 0.93 is less than the critical value of 1.645. The data imply
that the administrator and teacher respondents did not vary significantly in their
perceptions. It can be deduced that the respondents have a common stand on
the level of readiness of the Division of Pampanga to offer the SHS Program
regarding the state of physical facilities and infrastructures like classrooms,
laboratories, computer laboratories, and library requirements. This affirms the
study of Luistro (2015) which states that the SHS program is manageable and

145
JPAIR Multidisciplinary Research

that the agency is actively dealing with the needed infrastructure, the planned
construction initially of 30,000 new classrooms and school facilities and he is
confident that the implementation of the Grade 11 component will proceed.
B. Teachers’ training and preparations. The overall assessment of the
administrator-respondents obtained a mean score of 3.40, and standard deviation
of 1.44; while the assessment of the teacher-respondents was 3.30 and 1.37 for the
mean and standard deviation respectively. The result reveals that computed mean
of the respondents has a descriptive rating of fully ready. The overall computed
t-ratio of 0.96 is less than the critical value of 1.645. The result manifests that
the administrator and teacher respondents’ assessment did not vary significantly
in their perceptions regarding teachers’ training and preparations. It can be
concluded that administrators and teachers have the same views regarding the
level of readiness of the schools in the Division of Pampanga to offer the SHS
program specifically regarding teachers’ orientation, seminars and workshops, in-
service trainings, and LAC sessions being attended by the SHS teachers. This
contradicts the study of Ragasa (2012) which explains one basic problem of SHS
program is the lack of teacher training and the failure of the government to
address this problem and create gaps that if left unaddressed may imperil the full
implementation of the program.
C. Curriculum materials. The overall assessment of the administrators
had a 2.79 and 1.16 for the mean and standard deviation respectively; while
the assessment of the teacher-respondents obtained a mean value of 2.75, and
a standard deviation of 1.15. The findings show that curriculum materials are
ready. The overall computed t-ratio of 0.98 is less than the critical value of
1.645. The findings indicate that the administrator and teacher respondents’
assessment did not vary significantly in their perceptions. It can be deduced that
the respondents have a mutual conclusion on the level of preparedness on the
curriculum materials like curriculum guides, learning materials, teaching guides
and lesson exemplars. This opposes the findings of Rubante (2012) which foresaw
the problem in curriculum materials of the SHS that are not complete until the
pilot implementation of the new program.
D. Sources of Funds. The overall assessment of the administrators had a
mean value of 2.32 and standard deviation of 1.13 with a descriptive rating
of moderately ready; while the assessment of the teacher-respondents of 2.75
and 1.15 for the mean and standard deviation respectively and has a descriptive
rating of ready. The overall computed t-ratio of 0.84 is less than the critical value
of 1.645. The finding implies that the administrator and teacher respondents’

146
International Peer Reviewed Journal

assessment did not vary significantly regarding budget requirement. It can be


concluded that the respondents have the same interpretation of the Sources of
Funds like MOOE, PTA, LGU, and stakeholders support the implementation of
SHS program in the Division of Pampanga. This affirms the study of Dalumpines
(2011) which states the government can manage its sources and budget to attain
the goal of the Senior High School program of K to 12 and there are business
organizations which have been supporting the K to 12 Program on its continued
and proper reform implementation.

The Administrative and Instructional Practices Used in the Implementation


of the SHS Program
A. Administrative Practices. The administrative practices used in the
implementation of the SHS program are categorized into four KRAs; School
Leadership and Management Operations Practices, Human Resource Management
and Development Practices, Parents’ Involvement and Community Partnership
Practices and Learning Environment Practices The learning environment practices
got the highest mean score of 3.65 with a descriptive equivalent of always. The
parents’ involvement and community partnership practices, school leadership,
management and operations practices and human resource management and
development practices have the same descriptive equivalent of often with a mean
score of 3.49, 3.43 and 3.37 respectively. An overall mean score of 3.49 with a
descriptive equivalent of often means that the administrative practices are being
done four times a week.
This affirms the study of Belle (2017) that administrators’ administrative
strategies will make the school more effective and very helpful to needs of teachers
and students as well. It also centers around the ambidextrous leadership of the
principal: he should strike a balance between daily administrative matters and
devising and implementing effective disciplinary strategies to promote a healthy
environment in the school organizational climate and culture. Consequently,
administrator’s administrative practices in the implementation of SHS program
need to be sustained regarding learning environment and give additional
focus on parents’ involvement and community partnership, school leadership,
management and operations and human resource management and development
for the students to achieve the goal of the SHS program.
B. Instructional Practices. The assessment of the administrator and teacher
respondents in instructional practices used in the implementation of SHS program
have an overall assessment of the administrator-respondents obtained a mean

147
JPAIR Multidisciplinary Research

score of 2.67 and standard deviation of 1.13; while the assessment of the teacher-
respondents were 3.19 and 1.31 for the mean and standard deviation respectively
with a descriptive equivalent of often. The overall computed t-ratio of 1.00 is less
than the critical value of 1.645 which implies that the administrator and teacher
respondents’ assessment did not vary significantly. It can be concluded further
that administrators and teachers have the similar understandings regarding the
instructional leadership used as instructional practices in the implementation of
SHS program in the Division of Pampanga.
The finding affirms the study of Blase (1999) that instructional practices
are essential to all teachers’ perspectives on principals’ everyday instructional
leadership characteristics and it is great impact of those characteristics on
teachers. It is also mentioned that the everyday strategies of principals practicing
exemplary instructional leadership really influenced teachers.

Common Problems Encountered in the Implementation of the SHS Program


The common problems encountered by the teachers and administrators in
the implementation of SHS program are inadequate number of modules available
inadequate shoproom for TVL, inadequate laboratories for academic tracks,
students’ absenteeism, lack in learning / instructional materials, inadequate
number of classroom for the SHS students, subjects handled are not in line
with teachers specialization, minimal allotment of budget in the MOOE, non-
licensed teachers, unexperienced teachers, students are not prepared in his chosen
track, no tools and equipment in TVL, and untrained teachers, and the problem
of insufficient financial support from the school head. The data project that the
main problem in the implementation of SHS program is inadequate number of
available modules. This really made the teachers and administrators having hard
time in resourcing different books congruent to the competencies of the subjects.

Coping Measures Employed by the Administrators and Teachers in


Addressing the Problems Encountered.
The coping measures by the administrators and teachers in addressing the
problems encountered in the implementation of SHS program regarding the
problem no classroom for the SHS students is to compress/lessen the number of
section of JHS, second is to utilize the unfinished building and the last is shifting
of classes. The problems no laboratories for academic tracks and no shoproom
for TVL, the use of the JHS shoproom and TLE laboratory is the first coping
measure, the use of JHS laboratories like science laboratory is the second and the
last coping measure to address the problem is the teacher is bringing her own
148
International Peer Reviewed Journal

materials. Regarding lack in learning/instructional materials and no modules


available, the first coping measure is the teachers’ resourcefulness and initiatives.
Second is to purchase books using personal money. Third is the innovative use
of gadgets and internet. Fourth is peer – tutoring. Fifth is there is a per cluster
mentoring and lastly is borrowing books from college library.
Problems about unexperienced teachers, non-licensed teachers, subjects
handled are not in line with teachers’ specialization and untrained teachers are
given coping measure by first, coaching. Second is by mentoring followed by
assistance of the school head, encouraging teachers to take units in teaching, and
remediation are the third, fourth and fifth respectively. Lastly, to attend seminar
related to subject to address the problem. In the aspect of the problem in no
allotment of the budget in the MOOE and no financial support from the school
head, personal money is the first coping measure used. Partnership and adopt a
school program are the two remaining solutions to solve the problems. Lastly, on
the problem about students are not prepared in his chosen track and students’
absenteeism, the first coping measure is home visitation by their class adviser and
teachers. Parents’ conference, remediation and conference with students are the
second, third and fourth coping measures respectively.

Significant insights / observations in the implementation of SHS program in


the Division of Pampanga
The insights and the observations of the implementers were sought to get a
better picture of the state of program implementation. Seven administrators from
the seven cluster implementers who were directly involved in the implementation
of the new program were interviewed, and their responses were analyzed in
the light of three assertions: (1) the Schools Division of Pampanga has the
readiness to offer the SHS program; (2) there are problems affecting the smooth
implementation of the SHS program; and (3) there are administrative issues that
hinder the implementation of the SHS program.

Policy recommendation that may be proposed to further improve the


implementation of the Senior High School Program in the Division of
Pampanga
A number of significant observations and insights may be drawn from the
integration of the quantitative results and qualitative findings of the study: first,
as a whole, the Schools Division of Pampanga was perceived to have the readiness
to offer the SHS program. Moreover, the need to improve the physical facilities
and curriculum materials was brought to fore. Specially mentioned was the need
149
JPAIR Multidisciplinary Research

to improve the laboratory facilities and instructional modules. This finding raises
a big challenge to school administrators to strategically study the possibility of
realigning the local school board fund and the programming of the school MOOE
so that necessary provisions for the aforementioned needs could be made. Second,
the administrative and instructional practices used by the administrators in the
implementation of SHS program in the Division of Pampanga were indeed a big
help to the teachers and students as well. These practices were the guide of the
administrators to lead and manage the school properly especially the newly hired
teachers and students who are the first students of the new program.
The results of the study showed that there is an administrative area that needs
enhancement which is the human resource management and development. It
would seem exigent that the school administrators find more time establishing
rapport with teachers, coaching and mentoring them and giving rewards and
recognition to their accomplishments and lastly, the role of administrators
in providing leadership in the various facets of school operation is of utmost
important. It would seem very necessary that the administrative practices
particularly the organization and improvement of school – based management be
intensified to assist teachers in their instructional and other curricular planning
and development activities.

CONCLUSIONS

The administrators and teacher respondents were as a whole in agreement


that the Schools Division of Pampanga has the readiness to offer the Senior
High School program regarding physical facilities and infrastructures, teachers’
training and preparations, curriculum materials and budgetary requirements. The
school administrators have been pursuing their administrative and instructional
functions in support of the implementation of Senior High School program.
The Schools Division of Pampanga has the readiness to offer the Senior High
School program. Nonetheless, there is a need to address issues and problems
hindering the smooth implementation of the program.
The administrators and teachers of the Senior High School implementers
in the Schools Division of Pampanga are doing their very best to find solutions
to their encountered problems immediately so that there will be a smooth
implementation of the new program.

150
International Peer Reviewed Journal

TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH

The study can be translated into reports and documents stipulating the
coping measures they are using in addressing the problems encountered so
that other SHS implementers may see and benchmark those solutions in their
own schools. Schools Division Office can initiate a summit of different coping
measures used by the administrators and teachers of every SHS implementers
and recognized those best school implementers of the SHS program.
School administrators may study the possibility of strategically aligning the
local school board funds and logically program the school MOOE so that the
urgent needs of the teachers and students could be addressed.

LITERATURE CITED

Belle, L. J. (2018). The state secondary school principal as an effective leader


of learner discipline management. British Journal of Education, 6(1),
43-54. Retrieved on April 6, 2016 from https://scholar.google.com.ph/
scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=The+state+secondary+school+principal
+as+an+effective+leader+of+learner+discipline+management.+&btnG=

Blase, J., & Blase, J. (1999). Principals’ instructional leadership and teacher
development: Teachers’ perspectives. Educational administration quarterly,
35(3), 349-378. Retrieved on April 6, 2016 from https://scholar.google.
com.ph/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Principals%E2%80%99+instr
uctional+leadership+and+teacher+development%3A+Teachers%E2%80%9
9++perspectives.&btnG=

Dalumpines, S. (2011, May 10). DepEd starts orientation for K+12 education
program. GMA News Online. Retrieved on April 6, 2016 from http://www.
gmanetwork.com/news/story/220124/news/nation/deped-starts

Luistro, A. (2015, May 09). Philippine education reform program faces challenges.
Retrieved on April 6, 2016 from http://news.abs-cbn.com/focus/05/08/15/
philippine-education-reform-program-faces-challenges.

Matthew, I.A., (2012). Provision of Secondary Education in Nigeria: Challenges


and way forward. Retrieved on April 25, 2016 from https:// www.
academicjournals.org/article/article1380092456_Ige.pdf
151
JPAIR Multidisciplinary Research

Ragasa, J. M. (2012). The problem with Aquino’s K to 12 Program. Retrieved on


April 6, 2016 from http://www.philippinesbasiceducation.us/2012/06/
problem-with-aquinos-k-to-12-program.html#ixzz45dOuDCLF.

Rubante (2012). Rushed trainings, lack of materials mar implementation of K to 12.


Retrieved on April 16, 2016 from http://bulatlat.com/main/2012/05/30/
rushed-trainings-lack-of-materials-mar-implementation-of-k-to-12/.

Stotsky, S. (2008). The negative influence of education schools on the K–12


Curriculum. Retrieved on April 6, 2016 from https://www.nas.org/
articles/The_Negative_Influence_of_Education_Schools _on_the_K–12_
Curriculum

Tabora, S.J. (2014). Serious problems with the K-12 senior high school curriculum.
Retrieved on April 6, 2016 from https://taborasj.wordpress.com/2014/02/18/
serious-problems-with-the-k-12-senior-high-school- curriculum/.

152

You might also like