Dwnload Full Sociology 14th Edition Macionis Test Bank PDF
Dwnload Full Sociology 14th Edition Macionis Test Bank PDF
Dwnload Full Sociology 14th Edition Macionis Test Bank PDF
https://testbankfan.com/download/sociology-14th-edition-macionis-test-bank/
In this revision of the test bank, I have updated all of the questions to reflect changes in
Sociology, 14th edition. There is also a new system for identifying the difficulty of the questions.
In earlier editions, the questions were tagged in one of three ways: factual (rote memorization),
conceptual (dealing with key concepts), and applied (application of sociological knowledge to a
situation). In this revision, the questions are now tagged according to the six levels of learning
that help organize the text. Think of these six levels as moving from lower-level to higher-level
cognitive reasoning. The six levels are:
The 123 questions in this chapter’s test bank are divided into four types of questions.
True/False questions are the least demanding. As the table below shows, all of these questions
fall within the lowest three levels of cognitive reasoning (“Remember,” “Understand,” and
“Apply”). Multiple-choice questions span a broader range of skills (although more than half are
at the lowest two levels of difficulty, they range from “Remember” to “Evaluate”). Short answer
questions also span a broad range of skills (from “Understand” to “Evaluate”). Finally, essay
questions are the most demanding, with 80 percent at the three highest levels of cognitive
reasoning (“Analyze,” “Evaluate,” and “Create”).
Types of Questions
Easy to Difficult Level of Difficulty
True/False Mult Choice Short Answer Essay Total Qs
Remember 21 (54%) 29 (45%) 0 0 50
Understand 15 (38.5%) 9 (14%) 3 (30%) 1 (10%) 28
Apply 3 (7.5%) 11 (17%) 1 (10%) 1 (10%) 16
Analyze 0 9 (14%) 2 (20%) 2 (20%) 13
Evaluate 0 6 (9%) 4 (40%) 3 (30%) 13
Create 0 0 0 3 (30%) 3
39 64 10 10 123
TRUE/FALSE QUESTIONS
1. Two simple requirements that underlie the process of sociological investigation are (1)
looking at the world using the sociological perspective and (2) becoming curious and
asking questions.
(REMEMBER; answer: T; page 27)
7. The mean is always a better statistical measure than the mode or the median.
(UNDERSTAND; answer: F; page 30)
10. A variable that is changed by another variable is called the “independent variable.”
(REMEMBER; answer: F; page 31)
11. A variable that causes change in another variable is called the “dependent variable.”
(REMEMBER; answer: F; page 31)
12. When two variables are statistically related, a cause-and-effect relationship exists.
(UNDERSTAND; answer: F; pages 31-32)
13. A false correlation between two variables caused by a third variable is described as a
“spurious” correlation.
(UNDERSTAND; answer: T; page 31)
14. Natural scientists often have an easier time than social scientists when identifying cause-
and-effect relationships.
(UNDERSTAND; answer: T; page 32)
16. Max Weber urged sociologists to strive toward the goal of being value-free.
(REMEMBER; answer: T; page 32)
18. The logic and methodology of science guarantee that sociological research will result in
objective, absolute truth.
(UNDERSTAND; answer: F; pages 32-33)
19. Interpretive sociology focuses less on action itself and more on the meaning people attach
to their actions.
(REMEMBER; answer: T; page 33)
20. Scientific sociologists make use of what Max Weber called “verstehen” in order to make
sense of their surroundings.
(REMEMBER; answer: F; page 33)
22. Critical sociology studies society and tries to bring about social change.
(REMEMBER; answer: T; page 34)
24. Gender blindness is the problem of failing to consider the importance of gender in
sociological research.
(UNDERSTAND; answer: T; page 35)
26. Carrying out research on Hispanic people, Asian people, or people of any distinctive
ethnicity or category demands that researchers be sensitive to how subjects will interpret
their words and actions.
(APPLY; answer: T; page 36)
RODENTIA.
Passing now to the rodents or gnawing animals, we find that the
large grey squirrel (Sciurus cinereus, Desm.) is very good eating.
The flesh of the squirrel is much valued by the Dyaks, and it will,
doubtless, hereafter be prized for the table of Europeans.
The marmot (Arctomys Marmotta), in its fat state, when it first retires
to its winter quarters, is in very good condition, and is then killed and
eaten in great numbers, although we may affect to despise it.
The mouse, to the Esquimaux epicures, is a real bonne bouche, and
if they can catch half-a-dozen at a time, they run a piece of horn or
twig through them, in the same manner as the London poulterers
prepare larks for the table; and without stopping to skin them, or
divest them of their entrails, broil them over the fire; and although
some of the mice may have belonged to the aborigines of the race,
yet so strong is the mastication of the natives, that the bones of the
animal yield to its power as easily as the bones of a rabbit would to a
shark.
There is a very large species of rat spoken of as found in the island
of Martinique, nearly four times the size of the ordinary rat. It is black
on the back, with a white belly, and is called, locally, the piloris or
musk rat, as it perfumes the air around. The inhabitants eat them;
but then they are obliged, after they are skinned, to expose them a
whole night to the air; and they likewise throw away the first water
they are boiled in, because it smells so strongly of musk.
The flesh of the musk rat is not bad, except in rutting time, for then it
is impossible to deprive it of the musky smell and flavour.
So fat and sleek do the rats become in the West Indies, from feeding
on the sugar cane in the cane fields, that some of the negroes find
them an object of value, and, with the addition of peppers and similar
spiceries, prepare from them a delicate fricassée not to be
surpassed by a dish of French frogs.
There is a professional rat-catcher employed on each sugar
plantation, and he is paid so much a dozen for the tails he brings in
to the overseer. Father Labat tells us that he made his hunters bring
the whole rat to him, for if the heads or tails only came, the bodies
were eaten by the negroes, which he wished to prevent, as he
thought that this food brought on consumption! The health of the
negroes was then a matter of moment, considering the money value
at which they were estimated and sold. A rat hunt in a cane field
affords glorious sport. In cutting down the canes, one small patch is
reserved standing, into which all the rats congregate, and the
negroes, surrounding the preserve, with their clubs and bill-hooks
speedily despatch the rats, and many are soon skinned and cooked.
The negroes in Brazil, too, eat every rat which they can catch; and I
do not see why they should not be well-tasted and wholesome meat,
seeing that their food is entirely vegetable, and that they are clean,
sleek, and plump. The Australian aborigines eat mice and rats
whenever they can catch them.
Scinde is so infested with rats, that the price of grain has risen 25
per cent. from the destruction caused to the standing crops by them.
The government commissioner has recently issued a proclamation
granting head-money on all rats and mice killed in the province. The
rate is to be 3d. a dozen, the slayer having the privilege of keeping
the body and presenting the tail.
In China, rat soup is considered equal to ox-tail soup, and a dozen
fine rats will realize two dollars, or eight or nine shillings.
Besides the attractions of the gold-fields for the Chinese, California
is so abundantly supplied with rats, that they can live like Celestial
emperors, and pay very little for their board. The rats of California
exceed the rats of the older American States, just as nature on that
side of the continent exceeds in bountifulness of mineral wealth. The
California rats are incredibly large, highly flavoured, and very
abundant. The most refined Chinese in California have no hesitation
in publicly expressing their opinion of ‘them rats.’ Their professed
cooks, we are told, serve up rats’ brains in a much superior style to
the Roman dish of nightingales’ and peacocks’ tongues. The sauce
used is garlic, aromatic seeds, and camphor.
Chinese dishes and Chinese cooking have lately been popularly
described by the fluent pen of Mr. Wingrove Cooke, the Times’
correspondent in China, but he has by no means exhausted the
subject. Chinese eating saloons have been opened in California and
Australia, for the accommodation of the Celestials who now throng
the gold-diggings, despite the heavy poll-tax to which they have
been subjected.
Mr. Albert Smith, writing home from China, August 22, 1858, his first
impressions, says:—
‘The filth they eat in the eating houses far surpasses that cooked at
that old trattoria at Genoa. It consists for the most part of rats, bats,
snails, bad eggs, and hideous fish, dried in the most frightful
attitudes. Some of the restaurateurs carry their cook-shops about
with them on long poles, with the kitchen at one end, and the salle-à-
manger at the other. These are celebrated for a soup made, I should
think, from large caterpillars boiled in a thin gravy, with onions.’
The following is an extract from the bill of fare of one of the San
Francisco eating houses—
Grimalkin steaks 25 cents.
Bow-wow soup 12 ”
Roasted bow-wow 18 ”
Bow-wow pie 6 ”
Stews ratified 6 ”
The latter dish is rather dubious. What is meant by stews rat-ified?
Can it be another name for rat pie? Give us light, but no pie.
The San Francisco Whig furnishes the following description of a
Chinese feast in that city:—‘We were yesterday invited, with three
other gentlemen, to partake of a dinner à la Chinese. At three o’clock
we were waited upon by our hosts, Keychong, and his partner in
Sacramento-street, Peter Anderson, now a naturalized citizen of the
United States, and Acou, and escorted to the crack Chinese
restaurant in Dupont-street, called Hong-fo-la, where a circular table
was set out in fine style:—
‘Course No. 1.—Tea, hung-yos (burnt almonds), ton-kens (dry
ginger), sung-wos (preserved orange).
‘Course No 2.—Won-fo (a dish oblivious to us, and not mentioned in
the cookery-book).
‘No. 3.—Ton-song (ditto likewise).
‘No. 4.—Tap-fau (another quien sabe).
‘No. 5.—Ko-yo (a conglomerate of fish, flesh, and fowl).
‘No. 6.—Suei-chon (a species of fish ball).
‘Here a kind of liquor was introduced, served up in small cups,
holding about a thimbleful, which politeness required we should
empty between every course, first touching cups and salaaming.
‘No. 7.—Beche-le-mer (a dried sea-slug, resembling India rubber,
worth one dollar per pound).
‘No. 8—Moisum. (Have some?)
‘No. 9.—Su-Yum (small balls, as bills of lading remark, ‘contents
unknown’).
‘No. 10.—Hoisuigo (a kind of dried oyster).
‘No. 11.—Songhai (China lobster).
‘No. 12.—Chung-so (small ducks in oil).
‘No. 13.—Tong-chou (mushrooms, worth three dollars per pound).
‘No. 14.—Sum-yoi (birds’ nests, worth 60 dollars per pound).
‘And some ten or twelve more courses, consisting of stewed acorns,
chestnuts, sausages, dried ducks, stuffed oysters, shrimps,
periwinkles, and ending with tea—each course being served up with
small china bowls and plates, in the handiest and neatest manner;
and we have dined in many a crack restaurant, where it would be a
decided improvement to copy from our Chinese friends. The most
difficult feat for us was the handling of the chop sticks, which mode
of carrying to the mouth is a practical illustration of the old proverb,
‘many a slip ’twixt the cup and lip.’ We came away, after a three
hours’ sitting, fully convinced that a China dinner is a very costly and
elaborate affair, worthy the attention of epicures. From this time,
henceforth, we are in the field for China, against any insinuations on
the question of diet à la rat, which we pronounce a tale of untruth.
We beg leave to return thanks to our host, Keychong, for his elegant
entertainment, which one conversant with the Chinese bill of fare
informs us, must have cost over 100 dollars. Vive la China!’
Mr. Cooke, in his graphic letters from China, speaks of the fatness
and fertility of the rats of our colony of Hong Kong. He adds: ‘When
Minutius, the dictator, was swearing Flaminius in as his Master of the
Horse, we are told by Plutarch that a rat chanced to squeak, and the
superstitious people compelled both officers to resign their posts.
Office would be held with great uncertainty in Hong Kong if a similar
superstition prevailed. Sir John Bowring has just been swearing in
General Ashburnham as member of the Colonial Council, and if the
rats were silent, they showed unusual modesty. They have forced
themselves, however, into a state paper. Two hundred rats are
destroyed every night in the gaol. Each morning the Chinese
prisoners see, with tearful eyes and watering mouths, a pile of these
delicacies cast out in waste. It is as if Christian prisoners were to see
scores of white sucking pigs tossed forth to the dogs by
Mahommedan gaolers. At last they could refrain no longer. Daring
the punishment of tail-cutting, which follows any infraction of prison
discipline, they first attempted to abstract the delicacies. Foiled in
this, they took the more manly course. They indited a petition in good
Chinese, proving from Confucius that it is sinful to cast away the
food of man, and praying that the meat might be handed over to
them to cook and eat. This is a fact, and if General Thompson
doubts it, I recommend him to move for a copy of the
correspondence.’
A new article of traffic is about to be introduced into the China
market from India, namely, salted rats! The genius with whom the
idea originated, it would appear, is sanguine; so much so, that he
considers himself ‘on the fair road to fortune.’ The speculation
deserves success, if for nothing else than its originality. I have not,
as yet however, observed the price that rules in Whampoa and Hong
Kong nor the commodity quoted in any of the merchants’ circulars,
though it will, doubtless, soon find its place in them as a regular
article of import.
A correspondent of the Calcutta Citizen, writing from Kurrachee, the
chief town of the before mentioned rat infested province of Scinde,
declares that he is determined to export 120,000 salted rats to
China. The Chinese eat rats, and he thinks they may sell. He says:
—‘I have to pay one pice a dozen, and the gutting, salting, pressing,
and packing in casks, raises the price to six pice a dozen (about
three farthings), and if I succeed in obtaining anything like the price
that rules in Whampoa and Canton for corn-grown rats, my fortune is
made, or rather, I will be on the fair road to it, and will open a fine
field of enterprise to Scinde.’
Rats may enter into consumption in other quarters, and among other
people, than those named, when we find such an advertisement as
the following in a recent daily paper at Sydney:—
‘Rats! Rats! Rats!—To-night at 8 o’clock, rattling sport; 200
rats to be entered at G. W. Parker’s Family Hotel.’
Query.—What ultimately becomes of these rats, and who are the
persons who locate and take their meals at this ‘Family Hotel?’
Probably they are of the rough lot whose stomachs are remarkably
strong.
Some classes of the Malabars are very fond of the bandicoot, or pig
rat (Perameles nasuta, Geoff. Desm.), which measures about
fourteen inches in length from head to tail, the tail being nearly as
long as the body. They are much sought after by the coolies, on the
coffee estates in Ceylon, who eat them roasted. They also eat the
coffee rat (Golunda Ellioti of Gray), roasted or fried in oil, which is
much smaller, the head and body only measuring about four or five
inches. These animals are migratory, and commit great damages on
the coffee tree, as many as a thousand having been killed in a day
on one estate. The planters offer a reward for the destruction of
these rodents, which brings grist to the mill in two ways to the coolies
who hunt or entrap them, namely, in money and food.
The fat dormouse (Myoxus glis, Desm.) is used for food in Italy, as it
was by the ancient Romans, who fattened them for the table in
receptacles called Gliraria.
Dr. Rae, in his last arctic exploring expedition, states, that the
principal food of his party was geese, partridges, and lemmings
(Arvicola Hudsonia). These little animals were migrating northward,
and were so numerous that their dogs, as they trotted on, killed as
many as supported them all, without any other food.
There is another singular little animal, termed by naturalists the
vaulting rat, or jerboa. On an Australian species, the Dipus Mitchelli,
the natives of the country between Lake Torrens and the Great
Creek, in Australia seem chiefly to subsist. It is a little larger than a
mouse, and the hind legs are similar to those of the kangaroo.
Captain Sturt and his exploring party once witnessed a curious
scene. They came to a native who had been eating jerboas, and
after they met him they saw him eat one hundred of them. His mode
of cooking was quite unique. He placed a quantity, for a few
seconds, under the ashes of the fire, and then, with the hair only
partially burnt off, took them by the tail, put the body in his mouth,
and bit the tail off with his teeth. After he had eaten a dozen bodies,
he took the dozen tails, and stuffed them into his mouth.
The flesh of the beaver is looked upon as very delicate food by the
North American hunters, but the tail is the choicest dainty, and in
great request. It is much prized by the Indians and trappers,
especially when it is roasted in the skin, after the hair has been
singed off; and in some districts it requires all the influence of the fur-
traders to restrain the hunters from sacrificing a considerable
quantity of beaver fur every year to secure the enjoyment of this
luxury. The Indians of note have generally one or two feasts in a
season, wherein a roasted beaver is the prime dish. It resembles
pork in its flavour, but it requires a strong stomach to sustain a full
meal of it. The flesh is always in high estimation, except when they
have fed upon the fleshy root of a large water lily, which imparts a
rank taste to it.
The flesh of a young porcupine is said to be excellent eating, and
very nutritious. The flavour is something between pork and fowl. To
be cooked properly, it should be boiled first, and afterwards roasted.
This is necessary to soften the thick, gristly skin, which is the best
part of the animal. The flesh of the porcupine is said to be used by
the Italians as a stimulant; but, never having tasted it myself, I
cannot speak from experience as to the virtue of this kind of food.
The Dutch and the Hottentots are very fond of it; and when skinned
and embowelled, the body will sometimes weigh 20 lbs. The flesh is
said to eat better when it has been hung in the smoke of a chimney
for a couple of days.
The flesh of the crested porcupine (Hystrix cristata) is good and very
agreeable eating. Some of the Hudson Bay trappers used to depend
upon the Hystrix dorsata for food at some seasons of the year.
Rabbits, which form so large an article of consumption with us, are
not much esteemed as an article of food by the negroes in the West
Indies, resembling, in their idea, the cat. Thus, a black who is
solicited to buy a rabbit by an itinerant vendor, would indignantly
exclaim, ‘Rabbit? I should just like to no war you take me for,
ma’am? You tink me go buy rabbit? No, ma’am, me no cum to dat
yet; for me always did say, an me always will say, dat dem who eat
rabbit eat pussy, an dem who eat pussy eat rabbit. Get out wid you,
and your rabbit?’
And yet, with all this mighty indignation against rabbits, they do not
object, as we have seen, to a less dainty animal in the shape of the
rat.
Although the negroes in the West Indies do not care for rabbits, yet
their brethren in the American States are by no means averse to
them. A field slave one day found a plump rabbit in his trap. He took
him out alive, held him under his arm, patted him, and began to
speculate on his qualities. ‘Oh, how fat. Berry fat. The fattest I eber
did see. Let me see how I’ll cook him. I’ll broil him. No, he is so fat he
lose all de grease. I fry him. Ah yes. He so berry fat he fry hisself.
Golly, how fat he be. No, I won’t fry him—I stew him.’ The thought of
the savory stew made the negro forget himself, and in spreading out
the feast in his imagination, his arms relaxed, when off hopped the
rabbit, and squatting at a goodly distance, he eyed his late owner
with cool composure. The negro knew there was an end of the stew,
and summoning up all his philosophy, he thus addressed the rabbit,
at the same time shaking his fist at him, ‘You long-eared, white-
whiskered rascal, you not so berry fat arter all.’
I need not here touch upon hare soup, jugged hare, or roasted hare,
from the flesh of our own rodent; but the Arctic hare (Lepus glacialis)
differs considerably from the English in the colour and quality of its
flesh, being less dry, whiter, and more delicately tasted; it may be
dressed in any way. When in good condition it weighs upwards of 10
lbs.
The capybara, or water hog (Hydrochœrus capybara), an ugly-
looking, tailless rodent, the largest of the family, is hunted for its flesh
in South America, and is said to be remarkably good eating. It grows
to the size of a hog two years old.
The flesh of the guinea pig (Cavia cobaya, Desm.) is eaten in South
America, and is said to be not unlike pork. When he is dressed for
the table his skin is not taken off as in other animals, but the hair is
scalded and scraped off in the same manner as it is in a hog.
The white and tender flesh of the agouti (Dasyprocta Acuti, Desm.),
when fat and well dressed, is by no means unpalatable food, but
very delicate and digestible. It is met with in Brazil, Guiana, and in
Trinidad. The manner of dressing them in the West Indies used to be
to roast them with a pudding in their bellies. Their skin is white, as
well as the flesh.
The flesh of the brown paca (Cœlogenus subniger, Desm.), a nearly
allied animal, is generally very fat, and also accounted a great
delicacy in Brazil.
Another South American rodent, the bizcacha, or viscascha
(Lagostomus trichodactylus), is eaten for food. It somewhat
resembles a rabbit, but has larger gnawing teeth, and a long tail. The
flesh, when cooked, is very white and good.
HORSE-FLESH.
At Paris, where all eccentricities are found, and even encouraged,
one of the latest gastronomic innovations is the use of horse-flesh.
The French are always adding to their dietetic regimen by
introducing new articles of food. This social phenomenon of making
the horse contribute to the nourishment of the human race, is not
altogether new. The ancient Germans and Scandinavians had a
marked liking for horse-flesh. The nomade tribes of Northern Asia
make horse-flesh their favorite food. It has long been authorized and
publicly sold in Copenhagen.
With the high ruling prices of butcher’s meat, what think you,
gentlemen and housekeepers, of horse-flesh as a substitute for beef
and mutton? Are you innocently ignorant of the French treatise of
that eminent naturalist and professor of zoology, M. St. Hilaire, upon
horse for food? Banquets of horse-flesh are at present the rage in
Paris, Toulouse, and Berlin. The veterinary schools there pronounce
horse-bone soup preferable beyond measure to the old-fashioned
beef-bone liquid, and much more economical.
Horse-flesh steak without sauce, and cold, is cited as a morsel
superior to the finest game that flies! and cut, too, from a horse
nearly a quarter of a century old; one of the labouring cavalry kind
who pranced at the sound of the trumpet, and snuffed the battle from
afar off, little dreaming he was doomed to steaks, soup, and
washing-day hashes. Horse-flesh pie, too, eaten cold, is a dainty
now at Berlin and Toulouse, and boiled horse, rechauffé, has
usurped the place of ragouts and secondary dishes! What a theme,
hippophology, to write upon. We shall soon hear in our city dining
rooms, ‘A piece o’ horse, my kingdom for a piece of horse!’ ‘Waiter! a
cut from the fore-shoulder, well done.’ ‘A horse sandwich and ale,
and the morning paper.’ Our witty friend Punch had its horse-laugh
recently upon the subject of the sensation this movement has
created in equestrian circles.
A Frenchman, observes a recent writer, was one day remonstrating
against the contempt expressed by Englishmen for French beef, the
inferiority of which he would not admit. ‘I have been two times in
England,’ said he, ‘but I nevere find the beef so supérieur to ours. I
find it vary convenient that they bring it you on leetle pieces of stick
for one penny, but I do not find the beef supérieur.’ ‘Good gracious!’
exclaimed the Englishman, ‘you have been eating cats’ meat for
beef.’ What this Frenchman did in the innocence of his heart, his
countrymen now do, it seems, with malice prepense.
And a Frenchman of considerable reputation, in a letter on
alimentary substances, and especially upon the flesh of the horse,
calls upon the whole world to put aside, what he considers, an
ancient and absurd prejudice, and to realize at home that famous
sentence in the geography we used to read at school, which, under
the head of Norway, informed us ‘horse-flesh is publicly sold in the
markets.’
‘M. Isidore St. Hilaire is very serious. He does not merely advocate
the fillet of horse-flesh—the mare soup and fricasseed colt—in
sarcastic allusion to the practice of Parisian restaurants. He comes
gravely forward, with chapters of scientific evidence and argument,
to contend that, while animal food is absolutely necessary to the
proper nourishment of the human race, millions of Frenchmen eat no
animal food, and every year millions of pounds of excellent meat are
wasted. He knows how the cause he advocates lends itself to
ridicule—he knows how difficult it has always been to get rid of a
prejudice—he knows the fate of innovators; but, though a
Frenchman, he braves ridicule, brings a heavy battery of facts to
destroy what he deems a prejudice, and is already experiencing
some of the triumph which follows a hard-won victory. For seven
years he has been advocating the desirableness of eating horse-
flesh—for seven or eight years he has been collecting evidence and
gaining converts—and now he feels strong enough to appeal to the
European public in a small volume.[9]
‘Since then, Germany has had its ‘Banquets of Horse-flesh’ for the
wits to ridicule—public feastings at which ‘cats’ meat’ was served in
various forms, as soup, as bouilli, as fillet, as cutlet; and all the
feasters left the table converted hippophagists. In 1841, horse-flesh
was adopted at Ochsenhausen and Wurtemburg, where it is now
publicly sold under the surveillance of the police. Every week five or
six horses are brought to market. At the Lake of Constance, a large
quantity of this meat is also sold. In 1842, a banquet of 150 persons
inaugurated its public use at Königsbaden, near Stuttgard. In 1846,
the police of Baden authorized its public sale, and Schaffhausen
followed in the same year. In 1847, at Detmold and at Weimar, public
horse-flesh banquets were held with great éclat—in Karlsbad
(Bohemia) and its environs, the new beef came into general use—
and at Zittau, 200 horses are eaten annually. At Ling, after one of
these banquets, the police permitted the sale of horse-flesh, which is
now general in Austria, Bohemia, Saxony, Hanover, Switzerland, and
Belgium. The innovation made rapid converts. In 1853, Berlin had no
less than five abattoirs, where 150 horses were killed and sold. At
Vienna, in 1853, there was a riot to prevent one of these banquets;
but in 1854, such progress had been made, that 32,000 pounds
weight were sold in fifteen days, and at least 10,000 of the
inhabitants habitually ate horse-flesh.’ And now Parisian banquets of
horse-flesh are common.
These facts are at all events curious. Think of the prejudices to be
overcome, and think how unreasoning is the stomach!
Young horses are too valuable to be brought to the shambles, unless
killed by accident. But our worn-out hacks, of which 250 or 300 die or
are killed weekly in the metropolis,—old horses used up, are
capable, we are assured, of furnishing good meat. An old horse,
which had done duty for twenty-five years, was the substance of a
learned gastronomic feast at Paris.
M. St. Hilaire, the champion of this new addition to our food
resources, reasons in this fashion:—‘Horse-flesh has long been
regarded as of a sweetish disagreeable taste, very tough, and not to
be eaten without difficulty. So many different facts are opposed to
this prejudice, that it is impossible not to recognize its slight
foundation. The free or wild horse is hunted as game in all parts of
the world where it exists—Asia, Africa, and America—and formerly,
and perhaps even now, in Europe. The domestic horse itself is made
use of as alimentary as well as auxiliary—in some cases altogether
alimentary—in Africa, America, Asia, and in some parts of Europe.
‘Its flesh is relished by people the most different in their manner of
life, and of races the most diverse, negro, Mongol, Malay, American,
Caucasian. It was much esteemed up to the eighth century among
the ancestors of some of the greatest nations of Western Europe,
who had it in general use, and gave it up with regret. Soldiers to
whom it has been served out, and people in towns who have bought
it in markets, have frequently taken it for beef. Still more often, and
indeed habitually, it has been sold in restaurants, even in the best,
as venison, and without the customers ever suspecting the fraud or
complaining of it.
‘And further, if horse-flesh has been often accepted as good under a
false name, it has also been pronounced good by those who, to
judge of its qualities, have submitted it to careful experiment, and by
all who have tasted it in a proper condition, that is, when taken from
a sound and rested horse, and kept sufficiently long. It is then
excellent roasted; and if it be not so acceptable as bouilli, it is
precisely because it furnishes one of the best soups—perhaps the
best that is known.
‘It is good also, as experiments prove made by myself as well as
others, when taken from old horses not fattened, whose age was 16,
19, 20, and even 23 years, animals thought worth no more than a
few francs beyond the value of their skin.