Palgrave DDDMP 4350098
Palgrave DDDMP 4350098
Palgrave DDDMP 4350098
Efthymios Constantinides
studied Economics at the BA
level and Economics of European
Integration at the post-graduate
level; his PhD dissertation
focused on Marketing in Virtual
Environments. After a corporate
Web 2.0: Conceptual
career of ten years (among
others for Ericsson and KLM),
foundations and
he worked as Senior Lecturer
Marketing for the International
marketing issues
Agricultural College Larenstein,
the Netherlands. Currently, he is Efthymios Constantinides and Stefan J. Fountain
working as Assistant Professor Received: 24 October 2007
E-Commerce in the faculty of
Management and Governance
of the University of Twente, the
Netherlands, and is visiting Abstract
professor at the University of
This paper identifies the technological and commercial
Castilla-La Mancha, Spain. His
research interests are focused on foundations of the new category of online applications commonly
strategy in virtual marketplaces, described as Web 2.0 or Social Media. It examines the relevance
E-Marketing and online consumer of Web 2.0 for Marketing Strategy and for Direct Marketing in
behaviour. particular. The issue is not a clear-cut one: while several observers
Stefan J. Fountain saw in Web 2.0 a new stage in the evolution of the internet,
studied Business Information
others simply rejected it as a new High-Tech hype while there is
Technology in the Netherlands at
the Faculty of Computer Science, still no generally accepted definition and demarcation of the term.
University of Twente. He recently Paradoxically, even without an accepted definition and despite
completed his MSc thesis, which lack of extensive research, the corporate world seems to embrace
deals with the effects of Trust and the Web 2.0 concept: high-profile mergers and acquisitions have
Network effects on the success
of online organisations. He is
already taken place or are under way while corporations are
currently working as project rushing to integrate various forms of social media into their
leader for the Web 2.0 startup marketing planning. The experience so far, based to a large degree
Soocial (www.soocial.com) and is on anecdotal evidence, is that Web 2.0 has a substantial effect on
the co-founder of Eight Media web
development studio in Arnhem, the
consumer behaviour and has contributed to an unprecedented
Netherlands. customer empowerment. The consequences are far reaching,
affecting not only the area of technology development but also the
domains of business strategy and marketing. From the academic
but also the practical point of view, attention must be placed on
the demarcation and evaluation of the new technologies and
trends so that the real value of Web 2.0 as a component of the
modern marketing can be determined.
Keywords: Web 2.0, social Journal of Direct, Data and Digital Marketing Practice (2008) 9, 231–244.
media, internet marketing, online doi:10.1057/palgrave.dddmp.4350098
marketing, online consumer
behaviour, direct marketing,
marketing strategy
Efthymios Constantinides
Introduction
Faculty of Management and On the 2nd of April 2005, The Economist published an article titled
Governance ‘Crowned at last’ and TIME magazine, breaking a tradition of almost
University of Twente
P.O. Box 217
40 years, assigned the title of the 2006 Man of the Year not to any
Enschede 7500 AE, particular personality but to the modern virtual consumer. The
The Netherlands underlying theme of both publications — and many others that
Tel: + 31 53 4893799
Fax: + 31 53 4892159
followed — was the effect of the new kind of internet applications on
E-mail: e.constantinides@utwente.nl shaping a new class of consumers increasingly integrating the web into
© 2 0 0 8 PA LG R AV E MAC MILLAN LTD 1746- 0166 $30.00 VO L.9 NO.3 PP 231– 244. Journal of Direct, Data and Digital Marketing Practice 231
www.palgrave-journals.com/dddmp
Constantinides and Fountain
their daily life. Both articles describe how the phenomenon commonly
referred to as Web 2.0 or Social Media is affecting the way people
communicate, make decisions, socialise, learn, entertain themselves,
interact with each other or even do their shopping. They also suggest
that the Web 2.0, next to transforming peoples’ individual and group
behaviour, has also affected the power structures in the marketplace,
causing a substantial migration of market power from producers or
vendors towards customers. The main reason for this is that today’s
online consumer has access to a previously unknown reservoir of
information and knowledge as well as unlimited choice, available at the
click of the computer mouse.
Web 2.0 The terms Social Media and Web 2.0 are often used as
interchangeable; however, some observers associate the term Web 2.0
mainly with online applications and the term Social Media with the
social aspects of Web 2.0 applications (participation, openness,
conversation, community, connectedness; SpannerWorks, 2007). In this
paper, we will use the term Web 2.0 as an umbrella term of web
applications fulfilling a number of criteria to be defined further on.
The growing importance of the Web 2.0 and the effects on
consumers and organisations are issues frequently making headlines
and increasingly attracting academic attention. The interest is often
focused on the ways in which these applications contribute to customer
behavioural change and on new challenges facing strategists and
marketers (Urban, 2003; McKinsey Quarterly, 2007). There is little
clarity as to the exact nature of Web 2.0; for all intents and purposes,
there is still no generally accepted definition of the term and no
systematic research on its importance and its effects on the marketing
practice. This paper will attempt to define this phenomenon and
identify its dimensions in an effort to help marketers understand the
potential of Web 2.0 as a (direct) marketing tool.
232 © 20 0 8 PALGRAVE MACMILLAN LTD 1746- 0166 $3 0.00 VO L .9 NO.3 PP 231– 244. Journal of Direct, Data and Digital Marketing Practice
Web 2.0: Conceptual foundations and marketing issues
Five main categories 1. Blogs: Short for Web logs: online journals, the most known and
fastest-growing category of Web 2.0 applications. Blogs are often
combined with Podcasts, that is, digital audio or video that can
be streamed or downloaded to portable devices. Examples:
http://gizmodo.com, http://www.boingboing.net, http://www.
huffingtonpost.com
2. Social networks: applications allowing users to build personal
websites accessible to other users for exchange of personal content
and communication. Examples: http://www.myspace.com, http://
www.facebook.com, www.hyves.nl, http://www.ning.com/
3. (Content) Communities: Websites organising and sharing particular
types of content. Examples are applications of Video sharing: http://
video.google.com, www.youtube.com, http://etsylove.ning.com,
Photos sharing: http://www.flickr.com, Social Bookmarking www.
digg.com, http://del.icio.us and publicly edited Encyclopedias www.
wikipedia.org, http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Main_Page
4. Forums/bulleting boards: sites for exchanging ideas and information
usually around special interests Examples: www.epinions.com,
www.personaldemocracy.com, http://www.python.org.
5. Content aggregators: applications allowing users to fully customise
the web content they wish to access. These sites make use of a
technique known as Real Simple Syndication or Rich Site
Summary (RSS). Examples http://uk.my.yahoo.com/, http://www.
google.com/ig, http://www.netvibes.com/
The user is a vital factor for all categories of Web 2.0 applications,
not only as a consumer but mainly as a content contributor. The term
User-Generated Content (UGC) is often used to underline this special
attribute of all the above Web 2.0 application categories.
© 2 0 0 8 PA LG R AV E MAC MILLAN LTD 1746- 0166 $30.00 VO L.9 NO.3 PP 231– 244. Journal of Direct, Data and Digital Marketing Practice 233
Constantinides and Fountain
gold rush of the 1990s. The issue is already a subject of public debate
while studies about of the phenomenon have begun to surface
(McKinsey, 2007; Forrester, 2007). In the academic literature, the
topics of Web 2.0 and social media are slowly attracting attention
(Karger and Quan, 2005; Biever, 2006; Deshpande and Jadad, 2006;
Boll, 2007) and yet there is no visible line on research interests and
no definition of Web 2.0 enjoying general academic acceptance.
The term Web 2.0 was proposed by O’Reilly (2005) and it has
quickly become the new buzzword of Silicon Valley circles and the
media. For the software industry, the phenomenon is not really
new but marketers becoming familiar with Web 2.0 are increasingly
engaging this concept as part of their marketing strategy (McKinsey,
2007; Hitwise,1 Forrester, 2007). Expectations are high, despite the
fact that generally speaking the adoption rate among traditional
businesses is still low and the instruments being used are selective
and limited.2
Ambiguity The term Web 2.0 is used extensively despite the ambiguity as to its
exact meaning. Yet, using a common term serves a useful purpose: it
helps establish a common vision and provides a platform for
development of online service-oriented and customer-controlled
applications.
The influence of the Web 2.0 concept is evident in the field. One of
the most noticeable trends in the internet-mediated online marketplace
is that applications are increasingly being built no more on proprietary
platforms but rather on frameworks usually based on open-source
software. These frameworks enable the rapid development of new
forms of functionality, allowing the ‘democratisation’ of technology and
in many cases even facilitating connectivity to competitive applications.
Interconnectivity has substantially increased cooperation and interaction
among web users.
The value and benefits underpinning this trend are not always clear
and their effects have not yet been studied in a systematic way. One of
the reasons for this is the newness but most importantly the complexity
of the issue: in the Web 2.0 domain various technical and business
aspects are heavily interrelated, often making the identification of the
underlying value models difficult.
With regard to the innovative nature of Web 2.0, it can be argued
that the movement has not contributed many radically new
technological components; it has merely created new families of online
applications sharing a number of common sets of objectives,
characteristics and design principles. The main innovative aspect of
these applications is the way they allow user participation in the form
of content contribution and content editing; as such, they are usually
built on a common set of development practices and present users with
a new value proposition based on network effects.
234 © 20 0 8 PALGRAVE MACMILLAN LTD 1746- 0166 $3 0.00 VO L .9 NO.3 PP 231– 244. Journal of Direct, Data and Digital Marketing Practice
Web 2.0: Conceptual foundations and marketing issues
© 2 0 0 8 PA LG R AV E MAC MILLAN LTD 1746- 0166 $30.00 VO L.9 NO.3 PP 231– 244. Journal of Direct, Data and Digital Marketing Practice 235
Constantinides and Fountain
236 © 20 0 8 PALGRAVE MACMILLAN LTD 1746- 0166 $3 0.00 VO L .9 NO.3 PP 231– 244. Journal of Direct, Data and Digital Marketing Practice
Web 2.0: Conceptual foundations and marketing issues
© 2 0 0 8 PA LG R AV E MAC MILLAN LTD 1746- 0166 $30.00 VO L.9 NO.3 PP 231– 244. Journal of Direct, Data and Digital Marketing Practice 237
Constantinides and Fountain
238 © 20 0 8 PALGRAVE MACMILLAN LTD 1746- 0166 $3 0.00 VO L .9 NO.3 PP 231– 244. Journal of Direct, Data and Digital Marketing Practice
Web 2.0: Conceptual foundations and marketing issues
© 2 0 0 8 PA LG R AV E MAC MILLAN LTD 1746- 0166 $30.00 VO L.9 NO.3 PP 231– 244. Journal of Direct, Data and Digital Marketing Practice 239
Constantinides and Fountain
240 © 20 0 8 PALGRAVE MACMILLAN LTD 1746- 0166 $3 0.00 VO L .9 NO.3 PP 231– 244. Journal of Direct, Data and Digital Marketing Practice
Web 2.0: Conceptual foundations and marketing issues
Corporate options
Firms can capitalise on these developments in three different ways:
Active participation in Another option is to actively participate in the Web 2.0 domain by
the Web 2.0 domain launching corporate blogs and podcasts. Several business executives
like the CEO of Sun Microsystems Jonathan Swartz, the CEO of Apple
Computers Steve Jobs and the McDonalds Vice President Bob Langert
post regularly on corporate blogs, encouraging customers to interact
© 2 0 0 8 PA LG R AV E MAC MILLAN LTD 1746- 0166 $30.00 VO L.9 NO.3 PP 231– 244. Journal of Direct, Data and Digital Marketing Practice 241
Constantinides and Fountain
242 © 20 0 8 PALGRAVE MACMILLAN LTD 1746- 0166 $3 0.00 VO L .9 NO.3 PP 231– 244. Journal of Direct, Data and Digital Marketing Practice
Web 2.0: Conceptual foundations and marketing issues
voice and as means for direct, one-to-one marketing. These areas are
already pioneered by corporations testing and adopting new tactics
based on openness, dialogue and individual (one-to-one) approach,
offering customers the possibility to express their needs, creativity
and experiences and in some cases even involving customers in
the production of communication messages and the design of
their products.
From the academic point of view, these developments present a
challenging research domain that should embrace three main topics:
Three main topics 1. The identification and classification of the different types of
applications and instruments belonging to the Web 2.0 category
from the technological but also from the commercial perspective.
This will provide the basis for a comprehensive definition as a
basis for the systematic analysis of the phenomenon.
2. The study of the effects of these instruments on consumer
perceptions, needs and behaviour and the study of the effects of
Web 2.0-based approaches on market niches.
3. The value of Web 2.0 applications as marketing tools and ways to
maximise the effectiveness of these tools. The important questions
here refer to how these tools can be efficiently incorporated into
the marketing strategy, how they can become sources of additional
business value and how to use these as effective instruments of
customer acquisition and retention.
The social media are Finally, all indications point to the fact that the social media are here to
here to stay stay. In the future, Marketers should learn to co-exist and communicate
with a powerful customer very little sensitive to old-fashioned push
marketing and by and large determined to participate as an equal in the
marketing process.
Notes
1. HitWise.com, in a study published in April 2007, calculates the participation of Web 2.0 to
the top participatory websites to be 12,28 per cent, a 668 per cent increase compared to two
years ago.
2. Marketingvox.com, 28 March 2007.
3. RSS stands for Rich Site Summary. This technology allows web users to easily customise and
access websites of interest.
4. Anderson focuses on the specific example of online music sales in comparison with music
products sold in music stores where only the most popular music is selling enough units
justifying shelf space. Less popular music numbers or albums do not sell enough and thus
are not taken in the assortment of traditional brick and mortar stores where physical shelf
space is limited.
5. 2004 Yankelovich Marketing Resistance Survey.
6. 2004 Yankelovich Monitor.
7. According to Technorati.com, a firm measuring the development of this phenomenon as of 30
September 2006 1.3 million blog posts are published daily, 54.000 + per hour.
Further reading
Anderson, C. (2006) ‘The long tail: Why the future of business is selling less of more’, Hyperion,
ISBN 1401302378.
© 2 0 0 8 PA LG R AV E MAC MILLAN LTD 1746- 0166 $30.00 VO L.9 NO.3 PP 231– 244. Journal of Direct, Data and Digital Marketing Practice 243
Constantinides and Fountain
Biever, C. (2006) ‘Web 2.0 is all about the feel-good factor’, The New Scientist, Vol. 192, pp. 30.
Boll, S. (2007) ‘MultiTube — Where Web 2.0 and multimedia could meet’, IEEE Multimedia, Vol.
14, No. 1, pp. 9–13.
Constantinides, E. (2004) ‘Influencing the online consumer’s behaviour: The web experience’, Jour-
nal of Internet Research, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 111–126.
Daconta, M. (2003). The Semantic Web: A Guide to the Future of XML, Web Services, and Knowl-
edge Management, John Wiley & Sons Inc, New York.
Deshpande, A. and Jadad, A. (2006) ‘Web 2.0: Could it help move the health system into the 21st
century’, The Journal of Men’s Health & Gender, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 332–336.
Gilden, J. (2006) ‘Travel websites gain visitors by offering more than low prices’, Los Angeles
Times, 22 January 2006.
Gillin, P. (2007). The New Influencers, A Marketer’s Guide to the New Social Media, Quill Driver
Books\Word Dancer Press, Inc, CA, USA.
Karger, D. and Quan, D. (2005) ‘What would it mean to blog on the semantic web’, Web Semantics:
Science, Services and Agents, Vol. 3, No. 2–3, pp. 147–157.
Keegan, V. (2007) ‘Amateurs can be good and bad news’, The Guardian, 5 July 2007.
Keen, A. (2007). The Cult of the Amateur: How Today’s Internet is Killing our Culture, Doubleday/
Random House, New York.
Kotler, P. (2003). Marketing Management, 11th edn, Prentice-Hall International Editions, Englewood
Cliffs, NJ.
Li, C. and Stromberg, C. (2007). Calculating the ROI of Blogging: A Case Study, A Look At The ROI
Of General Motors’ FastLane Blog, Forrester Research, http://www.forrester.com/Research/
Document/Excerpt/0,7211,41066,00.html.
McKinsey. (2007) ‘How business are using Web 2.0: A McKinsey global survey’, The McKinsey
Quarterly, http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/Marketing/How_businesses_are_using_Web_20_
A_McKinsey_Global_Survey_1913_abstract.
O’Reilly, T. (2005) ‘What is Web 2.0?’, http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/
30/what-is-web-20.html.
Shirkey, C. (2003) ‘Power laws, weblogs, and inequality, networks, economics, and culture mailing
list’, Source: http://www.shirky.com/writings/powerlaw_weblog.html.
SpannerWorks. (2007) ‘What is social media’, www.spannerworks.com/ebooks.
Surowiecki, J. (2005). The Wisdom of Crowds, Anchor Books, New York.
Urban, G. (2003) ‘Customer advocacy: Is it for you? MIT Sloan School of Management’, Center for
E-Business, Paper 175.
Weill, P. and Vitale, M. (2001). Place to Space, Migrating to e-Business Models, Harvard Business
School Press, Boston, MA, USA.
Wilson, A. N. (2007) ‘The Internet is destroying the world as we know it’, Daily Mail Online,
8 June 2007.
244 © 20 0 8 PALGRAVE MACMILLAN LTD 1746- 0166 $3 0.00 VO L .9 NO.3 PP 231– 244. Journal of Direct, Data and Digital Marketing Practice