UP Notes - Credit Transactions
UP Notes - Credit Transactions
UP Notes - Credit Transactions
CREDIT
TRANSACTIONS
CIVIL LAW
Page 337 of 85
UP Law Bar Operations Commission 2023
FOR UP CANDIDATES ONLY
CREDIT TRANSACTIONS CIVIL LAW
money or other consumable thing, upon
the condition that the same amount of the
CREDIT same kind and quality shall be paid [Art.
1933, Civil Code].
TRANSACTIONS
A. Kinds
I. LOAN
Commodatum vs. Mutuum
Art. 1933, Civil Code. By the contract of loan, one
of the parties delivers to another, either something
1. Nature
not consumable so that the latter may use the same Commodatum Mutuum
for a certain time and return it, in which case the
contract is called a commodatum; or money or other
Purely personal in Not purely personal in
consumable thing, upon the condition that the same
amount of the same kind and quality shall be paid, in character character [Art. 1939,
which case the contract is simply called a loan or Civil Code]
mutuum.
Both are reciprocal obligations
Commodatum is essentially gratuitous.
If use is
compensated,
transaction is not a
commodatum, i.e.
lease.
Exception: The members of the bailee’s Exception: Bailee has right of retention
household may make use of the thing loaned. for damages when the bailor who,
knowing the flaws of the thing loaned,
Exceptions to the Exception: does not advise the bailee of the same
1. If there is a stipulation to the contrary, or [Arts. 1951, 1944, Civil Code].
2. The nature of the thing forbids such use
[Art. 1939 (2), Civil Code]. 5. Pay for the ordinary expenses for the use
and preservation of the thing loaned [Art.
1941, Civil Code].
Note: If, for the purpose of making use of 3. Bear equally (with the bailee) the
the thing loaned, the bailee incurs extraordinary expenses arising on the
expenses which are neither for the use occasion of actual use of the thing by the
nor the preservation of the thing, he is not bailee [Art. 1949, Civil Code].
entitled to reimbursement [Art. 1950, Civil
Code]. Exception: Contrary stipulation.
c. Obligations of the Bailor (DR-BP) 4. Pay damages to the bailee for hidden
flaws known to the bailor [Art. 1951, Civil
1. Demand the return of the thing only upon Code].
the expiration of the term or after the
accomplishment of the use [Art. 1946, Note: Bailor has no right of abandonment;
Civil Code]. he cannot exempt himself from payment
of expenses or damages to the bailee by
Exceptions: abandoning the thing to the latter [Art.
a. When bailor has urgent need of the 1952, Civil Code].
thing, he may demand its return
(extinguish commodatum) or its d. Liability for Deterioration
temporary use (suspend
commodatum) [Art. 1946, Civil Code]. General Rule: The bailee is NOT liable for the
b. Precarium [Art. 1947, Civil Code] or a deterioration of the thing loaned when the
contractual relation where the bailor deterioration of the thing is due only to the use
may demand the property loaned at thereof and without his fault [Art. 1943, Civil
will. Code].
c. If bailee commits any acts of
ingratitude in Art. 765 [Art. 1948, Civil Exception: The bailee is liable only when the
Code]: deterioration of the thing is due to his fault
d. Bailee committed some offense [Art. 1943, Civil Code].
against the person, honor or property
of the bailor, or of his wife or children e. Liability for Loss
under his parental authority;
e. Bailee imputes to bailor any criminal General Rule: The bailee is NOT liable for
offense, or any act involving moral loss of the thing due to a fortuitous event [Art.
turpitude, even though he should 1174, Civil Code].
prove it, unless the crime or act has Since the bailor retains ownership of the
been committed against the bailee property loaned, generally, it is the bailor who
himself, his wife or children under his bears the liability for loss of the property
authority; or loaned due to fortuitous events.
f. Bailee unduly refuses bailor support
when bailee is legally or morally Bailee is liable for loss if loss is due to
bound to give support to the bailor. Bailee’s fault.
General Rule: The bailee has no right of 1. Right of ownership; upon delivery/receipt
retention of the thing loaned on the ground of the loan of money or any fungible thing,
that the bailor owes him something, even the person acquires ownership of the
though it may be by reason of expenses [Art. money/fungible thing [Art. 1953, Civil
1944, Civil Code]. Code]
2. Right not to pay interest, unless stipulated
Exception: The bailee has the right of [Art. 1956, Civil Code]
retention for damages arising from hidden a. If the debtor, however, pays interest when
flaws when bailor, knowing the flaws of the there is no stipulation, the rules on solutio
thing loaned, does not advise the bailee of the indebiti, or natural obligations, shall be
same [Art. 1944, 1951, Civil Code]. applied [Art. 1960, Civil Code]
Note that the thing is retained by way of legal b. Obligations of the Creditor
pledge.
Barred from placing stipulations under any
g. Extinguishment (DEA-PU) cloak or device that circumvent laws on usury.
Such contract or stipulation shall be void [Art.
1. Death of either the bailor or the bailee [Art. 1957, Civil Code].
1939, Civil Code]
2. Expiration of term or accomplishment of
purpose [Art. 1946, Civil Code]
Page 342 of 444
UP Law Bar Operations Commission 2023
FOR UP CANDIDATES ONLY
CREDIT TRANSACTIONS CIVIL LAW
Rights of the Creditor 1. Requisites for Interest to be
Chargeable (EWL)
1. Right to receive an equal amount of the
same kind and quality [Art. 1953, Civil 1. Must be Expressly stipulated [Art. 1956,
Code] Civil Code]
2. Right to receive interest, once stipulated
[Art. 1956, Civil Code] If interest is stipulated to be paid, but the
rate of interest is not stipulated, the rate is
5. Precarium 6% (i.e. legal interest).
Note: The use of the term “owner” in Art. 1947 2. Kinds of Interest
(2) is inaccurate. Per Art. 1938, the bailor
need not be the owner of the thing loaned [De
a. Conventional Interest
Leon, supra].
Simple interest – Paid for the principal at a
B. Interest certain rate fixed or stipulated by the parties.
The Usury Law [Act No. 2655] is an act fixing a. Under the Truth in Lending Act [RA
rates of interest on loans and declaring the 3765]
effect of receiving or taking usurious rates and
for other purposes [Arevalo v. Dimayuga, G.R. Section 3(3), Truth in Lending Act. "Finance
No. L-26218 (1927)]. charge" includes interest, fees, service charges,
discounts, and such other charges incident to the
Elements of Usury [De Leon, supra]: (MR-IT) extension of credit as the Board may be regulation
1. A loan or forbearance of Money prescribe.
2. An understanding between parties that the
loan shall and may be Returned Note: This law applies to all persons who
3. An unlawful Intent to take more than the extend credit, who require as an incident to
legal rate for the use of money or its extending credit, the payment of a finance
equivalent charge [Sec. 3 (4), Truth in Lending Act].
4. The Taking or agreeing to take for the use
of the loan of something in excess of what “Credit” is defined in the TILA as “any loan,
is allowed by law. mortgage, deed of trust, advance, or discount;
any conditional sales contract; any contract to
Note: A usurious loan transaction is not a sell, or sale or contract of sale of property or
complete nullity but defective only with respect services, either for present or future delivery,
to the agreed interest, i.e., as if no interest under which part or all of the price is payable
was stipulated [Carpo v. Chua, G.R. Nos. subsequent to the making of such sale or
150773 and 153599 (2005)]. Hence, if the contract; any rental-purchase contract; any
principal obligation is the payment of a sum of contract or arrangement for the hire, bailment,
money, the debtor will be liable for the or leasing of property; any option, demand,
principal plus legal interest, following Art. lien, pledge, or other claim against, or for the
2209. delivery of, property or money; any purchase,
or other acquisition of, or any credit upon the
The Monetary Board of the Central Bank of security of, any obligation of claim arising out
the Philippines (now the Bangko Sentral ng of any of the foregoing; and any transaction or
Pilipinas) issued Circular No. 905, Series of series of transactions having a similar purpose
1982 which lifted the ceilings on interest rates or effect [Sec. 3 (2), Truth in Lending Act].
pursuant to the powers granted to it by the
Usury Law. Thus, usury is legally non-
existent. Interest can be charged based on
agreement of the parties pursuant to Art.
1306.
How Perfected: The deposit is perfected General Rule: The depositary is not liable in
upon delivery, which is made by the will of the the event of loss. The required degree of care
depositor [Arts. 1963 and 1968, Civil Code]. however, is greater if the deposit is for
compensation [Art. 1972, Civil Code].
1. Extinguishment
Exceptions: (NPC-FUTR)
Loss or destruction of thing deposited, or 1. Loss is through his fault or Negligence
1. In case of a gratuitous deposit, upon the [Art. 1170, Civil Code] or the negligence of
death of either the depositor or depositary his employee [Art. 1973, Civil Code], even
[Art. 1995, Civil Code]. The depositary is if the thing was insured [Art. 2207, Civil
not obliged to continue with the contract of Code];
deposit. 2. Loss while in his Possession, ordinarily
2. By other modes provided in the Civil raises presumption of fault on his part [Art.
Code, e.g. novation, merger, etc. [Art. 1265, Civil Code]
1231, Civil Code]. 3. Loss arose from the Character of the thing
deposited, and the depositary was notified
of, or was aware of such character at the
time of the constitution of the deposit [Art.
1993, Civil Code]
4. Loss is through a Fortuitous event, and if
Exception to the Exception: if such third If stipulated, depositor is obliged to pay fees.
person is manifestly careless or unfit [Art.
1973, Civil Code]; 5. Authority of Depositor
7. Loss occurs and the depositary Receives 1. When there are two or more depositors
money/replacement, he must deliver such and they are not solidary and the thing
to the depositor [Art. 1990, Civil Code] admits of division, one cannot demand
more than his share [Art. 1985, Civil
3. Authority of Depositary (CC-UR) Code].
2. If he should lose his capacity to contract
1. Depositary may Change way of deposit if after having made the deposit, the thing
he may reasonably presume that the cannot be returned except to persons who
depositor would consent if he knew the may have administration of his property
situation. He is to notify the depositor and rights [Art. 1986, Civil Code].
thereof and wait for the latter’s decision,
unless delay would cause danger [Art. 6. Right of Retention
1974, Civil Code].
2. Depositary is required to Collect on The depositary may retain the thing until the
interest earned by certificates, bonds,
full payment of what may be due him by
securities and instruments when it
reason of the deposit [Art. 1994, Civil Code].
becomes due [Art. 1975, Civil Code].
3. Depositary cannot make Use of the thing Note that the thing is retained by way of legal
deposited, unless with depositor’s consent
pledge [Ortiz v. Kayanan, G.R. No. L-32974
or its preservation requires its use [Art.
(1979)].
1977, Civil Code].
4. Depositary may Return the thing to the
depositor even before the time B. Necessary Deposit
designated, if there is justifiable reason
not to keep it. Made in compliance with a legal obligation, or
on the occasion of any calamity, or by
Exception: when the deposit is for valuable travelers with common carriers [Arts. 1734-
consideration [Art. 1989, Civil Code] 1735, Civil Code], or by travelers in hotels and
inns [Arts. 1998-2004, Civil Code].
3. Extent of Liability Under Art. 1998, The act of a thief or robber, who has entered
Civil Code the hotel is not deemed force majeure, unless
it is done with the use of arms or through
1. Those lost or damaged in hotel rooms irresistible force [Art. 2001, Civil Code].
which come under the term “baggage” or
articles such as clothing as are ordinarily b. Exemption or Diminution of Liability
used by travelers
2. Those lost or damaged in hotel annexes The hotel-keeper cannot free himself from
such as vehicles in the hotel’s garage [De responsibility by posting notices to the effect
Leon, supra]. that he is not liable for the articles brought by
3. Those lost after the perfection of the the guest [Art. 2003, Civil Code]. This is due
contract of deposit [Art. 1962, Civil Code, to public policy. The hotel business is imbued
Durban Apartments v. Pioneer Insurance, with public interest [YHT Realty Corp. v. CA,
G.R. No. 179419 (2011)] G.R. No. 126780 (2005)].
Exception: The creditor may, prior thereto, Rationale: To give the guarantor the
secure a judgment against the guarantor, who opportunity to allege and substantiate
shall be entitled, however, to a deferment of whatever defenses he may have against the
the execution of said judgment against him, principal obligation, and chances to set up
until after the properties of the principal debtor such defenses as are afforded him by law.
shall have been exhausted, to satisfy the
latter’s obligation [Tupaz v. CA, G.R. No. 7. A Compromise Shall Not Prejudice
145578 (2005)].
a Person Not Party to It [Art. 2063,
Civil Code]
3. The Creditor has the Duty to Make
Prior Demand for Payment from the A compromise between creditor and principal
Guarantor [Art. 2060, Civil Code] debtor benefits the guarantor but does not
prejudice him.
The demand is to be made only after
judgment on the debt. A compromise between guarantor and the
creditor benefits but does not prejudice the
principal debtor.
Page 357 of 444
UP Law Bar Operations Commission 2023
FOR UP CANDIDATES ONLY
CREDIT TRANSACTIONS CIVIL LAW
8. Effects of Guaranty between the 2. Specific Instances that Extinguish
Debtor and the Guarantor the Guaranty
1. The guarantor has the duty to notify the a. Creditor Voluntary Accepts the
debtor before paying the creditor [Art. Immovable for Payment
2068; see also Arts. 1236 and 1237, Civil
Code] The guarantor is released if the creditor
voluntarily accepts immovable or other
Should payment be made without property in payment of the debt, even if he
notification or against the debtor’s will, and should afterwards lose the same through
supposing the debtor has already made a eviction [Art. 2077, Civil Code].
prior payment, the debtor would be
justified in setting up the defense that the b. When an Extension is Granted to the
obligation has already been extinguished Debtor without the Consent of
by the time the guarantor made the
Guarantor
payment. The guarantor will then lose the
right of reimbursement and consequently
An extension granted to the debtor by the
the right of subrogation.
creditor without the consent of the guarantor
2. The guarantor cannot demand
extinguishes the guaranty.
reimbursement for payment made by him
before the obligation has become due [Art.
However, the mere failure on the part of the
2069, Civil Code]
creditor to demand payment after the debt has
become due does not, of itself, constitute any
General Rule: Since a contract of guaranty is extension of time [Art. 2079, Civil Code].
only subsidiary, the guarantor cannot be liable
for the obligation before the period on which c. When Subrogation is Not Feasible
the debtor’s liability will accrue. Any payment
made by the guarantor before the obligation is The guarantors, even though they may be
due cannot be indemnified by the debtor. The
solidary, are released from their obligation,
guarantor can only demand reimbursement whenever by some act of the creditor they
upon expiration of the period. cannot be subrogated to the rights,
mortgages, and preference of the latter [Art.
Exception: Prior consent or subsequent
2080, Civil Code].
ratification by the debtor.
The guarantor may also proceed against the E. Legal and Judicial Bonds
debtor even before payment has been made
under certain conditions [Art. 2071, Civil Article 2051, Civil Code. A guaranty may be
Code]. conventional, legal, or judicial, or gratuitous or by
onerous title.
Bondsman
A surety offered in virtue of a provision of law
or a judicial order.
Notice – a statement of information that is Should the intermediary refuse to enter into a
registered in the Registry relating to a security control agreement, the remedy of the grantor
interest or lien. The term includes an initial and secured creditor is to register the security
notice, amendment notice, and termination agreement instead, in order to perfect the
notice [Sec. 3 (e)]. security interest.
G. Repossession
This section amends Arts. 2241, 2243, 2246,
2247 of the Civil Code or the provisions on
Repossession is a preliminary process that
special preferred credits on movable property.
must be undertaken by secured creditor
1. The preference created by these Articles
seeking to enforce its security interest
will be SUBORDINATE to the priority
[Somera].
perfected pursuant to the PPSA [Somera].
2. During insolvency proceedings, the
May be undertaken extrajudicially or judicially.
perfected security interest shall constitute
a lien over the collateral [Rule VI, Sec.
Extra-Judicial Repossession
6.04(b), IRR of R.A. 11057].
The secured creditor may:
1. Take possession of the collateral without
Tangible Assets; Intangible Assets [Sec.
judicial process if the security agreement
12] so stipulates: Provided, That possession
can be taken without a breach of the
Tangible asset – any tangible movable asset, peace.
including: 2. Remove the collateral from the real
1. Money property to which it is affixed, in case it is
2. Negotiable instruments a fixture, without judicial process:
3. Negotiable documents; and Provided that –
4. Certificated non-intermediated securities a. The secured creditor has priority over
• Only if the mere possession of such all owners and mortgagees
instruments results in the ownership of b. The secured creditor exercises due
the underlying rights or property care in removing the fixture [Sec. 47
embodied by them [Rule I, Sec. (a) & (b)].
1.05(kk), IRR of R.A. 11057].
Judicial Repossession
Intangible asset – any movable property If, upon default, the secured creditor cannot
other than a tangible asset including, but not
take possession of collateral without breach of
limited to, investment property, deposit the peace, the secured creditor shall:
accounts, commodity contracts and 1. Be entitled to an expedited hearing upon
receivables [Rule 1, Sec. 1.05(m), IRR of R.A.
application for an order granting the
11057]. secured creditor possession of the
collateral. Such application shall include a
statement by the secured creditor, under
oath:
a. Verifying the existence of the security
agreement attached to the application;
and
Note: This clause will be strictly construed A real estate mortgage that is unregistered
[Prudential Bank v. Alviar, G.R. No. 150197 binds the parties to the contract and it only
(2005)]. A mortgage with a dragnet clause gives the mortgagee the right to demand the
makes the mortgage a continuing security and execution and recording of the mortgage. To
constitutes an exception to the rule that an bind third parties, a real estate mortgage must
action to foreclose a mortgage must be limited be recorded in the Registry of Property [Art.
to the amount mentioned in the mortgage 2125, Civil Code].
contract [PCSO v. New Dagupan Metro Gas
Corporation, G.R. No. 173171 (2012)]. Mortgage extends to the natural accessions,
to the improvements, growing fruits and the
Reliance on Security Test: When the rents or income not yet received when the
mortgagor takes another loan for which obligation becomes due, including indemnity
another security was given, it could not be from insurance, and/or amount received from
inferred that such loan was made in reliance expropriation for public use [Art. 2127, Civil
solely on the original security with the dragnet Code].
clause, but rather, on the new security given 1. Applies only when the accessions and
[Prudential Bank v. Alviar, supra]. accessories subsequently introduced
belongs to the mortgagor.
B. Characteristics 2. To exclude them, there must be an
express stipulation, or the fruits must be
collected before the obligation becomes
1. Characteristics of the Collateral
due.
3. Third persons who introduce
As a general rule, the mortgagor retains
improvements upon the mortgaged
possession of the property. He may deliver
property may remove them at any time.
said property to the mortgagee without
altering the nature of the contract of mortgage.
The right to alienate the real estate mortgage
Mortgage creates an encumbrance over the credit is the right of the mortgagee to assign
property, but ownership of the property is not its rights under the principal obligation
parted with. It merely restricts the mortgagor’s secured. Although the mortgagee does not
jus disponendi over the property. The become the owner of the collateral, it owns
mortgagor may still sell the property, and any the real estate mortgage credit and may
stipulation to the contrary (pactum de non alienate the same to a third person [Art. 2128,
alienando) is void [Art. 2130, Civil Code]. Civil Code; Santiago v. Pioneer Savings &
Loan Bank, et al., G.R. No. 77502 (1988)].
However, a stipulation prohibiting the
mortgagor from entering into second or Pactum de non alienando (Sp. pacto de non
subsequent mortgages is valid since there is alienando) is prohibited:
no law prohibiting it [Litonjua et al. v. L&R 1. Stipulations forbidding the mortgagor from
Corporation, et al., G.R. No. 130722 (1999), selling the collateral [Art. 2130, Civil Code]
citing Philippine Industrial Co. v. El Hogar & 2. Stipulations forbidding the mortgagor from
Vallejo, G.R. No. 20482 (1923)]. selling the collateral without the consent of
the mortgagee [Litonjua, et al. v. L&R
Corporation, et al., supra, citing
2. Characteristics of the Mortgage
Tambunting v. Rehabilitation Finance
Corporation, G.R. Nos. L-54224-5 (1989).
A registered mortgage lien is considered
inseparable from the property inasmuch as it
Page 373 of 444
UP Law Bar Operations Commission 2023
FOR UP CANDIDATES ONLY
CREDIT TRANSACTIONS CIVIL LAW
Alienation or assignment of mortgage credit is iv. When the purchaser retains for
valid even if it is not registered. [Villanueva v. himself a part of the purchase
Perez, G.R. No. L-3438 (1907)]. price;
v. When the vendor binds himself to
C. Kinds pay the taxes on the thing sold;
vi. In any other case where it may be
1. Voluntary – constituted by the will of the fairly inferred that the real intention
owner of the property on which it is of the parties is that the
created. transaction shall secure the
2. Legal – required by law to be executed in payment of a debt or the
favor of certain persons: performance of any other
a. Persons in whose favor the law obligation. [Art. 1602, Civil Code]
establishes a mortgage have no other c. Provisions governing equitable
right than to demand the execution mortgage: Arts. 1365, 1450, 1454,
and recording of the document in 1602, 1603, 1604 and 1607
which the mortgage is formalized [Art.
2125, Civil Code] D. Principle of Indivisibility of
b. The bondsman who is to be offered in Mortgage
virtue of a provision of law or of a
judicial order shall have the
A mortgage is indivisible, even though the
qualifications prescribed in Art. 2056
debt may be divided among the successors in
(integrity, capacity to bind himself, and
interest of the debtor or of the creditor [Art.
sufficient property to answer for the
2089, Civil Code].
obligation), and in other laws [Art.
2082, Civil Code]
A mortgage directly and immediately subjects
c. If the person bound to give a bond
the property upon which it is imposed. It is
should not be able to do so, a pledge
indivisible even though the debt may be
or mortgage considered sufficient to
divided, and such indivisibility is likewise
cover his obligation shall be admitted
unaffected by the fact that the debtors are not
in lieu thereof [Art. 2083, Civil Code]
solidarily liable [Dayrit v. CA, G.R. No. L-
3. Equitable – One which, although lacking
29388 (1970)].
the proper formalities of a mortgage,
shows the intention of the parties to make
The principle of indivisibility presupposes
the property a security for the debt
several heirs of the debtor or creditor and
a. Lien created by equitable mortgage
DOES NOT APPLY in the absence of such a
ought not to be defeated by requiring
situation [Spouses Yu v. Philippine
compliance with formalities necessary
Commercial International Bank, G.R. No.
to the validity of voluntary real estate
147902 (2006)].
mortgage. Ex.: Pacto de retro
b. The contract shall be presumed to be
Indivisibility arises only when there is a
an equitable mortgage, in any of the
debtor-creditor relationship. It does not apply
following cases:
to assignees of an accommodation mortgagor
i. When the price of a sale with right
and not of a debtor-mortgagor. [Spouses Belo
to repurchase is unusually
v. Philippine National Bank, G.R. No. 134330
inadequate;
(2001), citing Philippine National Bank v.
ii. When the vendor remains in
Agudelo, G.R. No. L-39037 (1933)]
possession as lessee or
otherwise;
Note: Where only a portion of the loan is
iii. When upon or after the expiration
released, the mortgage becomes enforceable
of the right to repurchase another
only as to the proportionate value of the loan
instrument extending the period of
[Central Bank v. CA, G.R. No. L-45710
redemption or granting a new
(1985)].
period is executed;
Page 374 of 444
UP Law Bar Operations Commission 2023
FOR UP CANDIDATES ONLY
CREDIT TRANSACTIONS CIVIL LAW
Exception to the Principle of Indivisibility The elements of pactum commissorium are as
follows: [Development Bank of the Philippines
Where there are several things given in v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 118342 (1998)]
mortgage, each one of them guarantees only 1. There should be a property mortgaged by
a determinate portion of the credit, the debtor way of security for the payment of the
shall have a right to the extinguishment of the principal obligation; and
pledge or mortgage as the portion of the debt 2. There should be a stipulation for
for which each thing is specially answerable is automatic appropriation by the creditor of
satisfied [Art. 2089, Civil Code]. the thing mortgaged in case of non-
payment of the principal obligation within
the stipulated period.
E. Recording Required
Acceleration Clause Allowed
The real estate mortgage must be recorded in
the Registry of Property in order to be validly
constituted [Art. 2125, Civil Code]. Acceleration clause, or the stipulation stating
that on the occasion of the mortgagor’s
Note: The mortgage would still be binding default, the whole sum remaining unpaid
between the parties even if the instrument is automatically becomes due and demandable,
not recorded [Art. 2125, Civil Code]. is ALLOWED [Luzon Development Bank v.
Conquilla, G.R. No. 163338 (2005)].
F. Foreclosure of Mortgage Kinds of Foreclosure
1. Judicial Foreclosure
Foreclosure is the remedy available to the 2. Extrajudicial Foreclosure
mortgagee by which he subjects the
mortgaged property to the satisfaction of the
obligation secured by the mortgage by Judicial Extrajudicial
causing its alienation in accordance with the Foreclosure Foreclosure
procedures allowed by law [Spouses Caviles
v. CA, G.R. No. 126857 (2002)]. Court intervenes No court intervention