Report
Report
Report
14 ISSN 1580-2949
Original scientific article/Izvirni znanstveni ~lanek MTAEC9, 57(2)135(2023)
S. P. SARIDHE et al.: ROLE OF OLIVINE AGGREGATE IN LIME AND CEMENT MORTARS ...
135–140
Prejem rokopisa – received: 2022-12-17; sprejem za objavo – accepted for publication: 2023-01-25
doi:10.17222/mit.2022.719
Construction industry is majorly criticised due to a great liberation of carbon dioxide (CO2) into the atmosphere. Researchers
have identified various techniques to capture the atmospheric CO2. Nevertheless, the recognised methods have both merits as
well as demerits. Thus, scientific communities are working on simple and easily exhibited ways of capturing atmospheric CO2.
One such technique is the conversion of gaseous CO2 into stable calcium/magnesium carbonates. The present study was con-
ducted to identify the carbon-capturing efficiency of olivine aggregate in cement and lime mortars. Olivine aggregate has a ten-
dency to change its mineral structure under alkaline environment and it is able to interact with atmospheric CO2 to form a stable
carbonate. Analytical techniques (XRD, TGA) were conducted to elucidate the formation of hydrated phases formed in both
lime and cement mortars. The study concluded that the addition of olivine sequestered atmospheric CO2 and converted it into
magnesium carbonate. Out of the lime and cement mortar, lime mortar captured a greater amount of CO2 and produced stable
compounds.
Keywords: carbon capture, carbon sequestration, olivine aggregate
Gradbena industrija se v glavnem kritizira zaradi velike svobode do izpustov ogljikovega dioksida (CO2). Raziskovalci so do
sedaj izna{li razli~ne tehnike za zajemanje atmosferskega CO2. Vendar pa imajo vse te do sedaj ugotovljene metode oziroma
postopki dolo~ene prednosti in pomanjkljivosti. Tako znanstvena skupnost {e naprej dela na poenostavitvah poti za zajemanje
atmosferskega CO2. Ena od tak{nih mo`nih tehnik je pretvorba plinskega CO2 v trdno obliko kot so karbonati na osnovi kalcija
in magnezija. Predstavljena je {tudija s katero so poizku{ali ugotoviti u~inkovitost agregatov olivina ((Mg,Fe)2SiO4) v
cementnih in apnenih maltah. Agregati olivina (pesek z delci velikosti pod 65 μm) imajo sposobnost reagiranja z atmosferskim
CO2 in tendenco pretvorbe svoje mineralne strukture v alkalnem okolju v trdni karbonat. S pomo~jo analiti~nih metod (XRD,
TGA) so razlo`ili nastanek hidratne faze, ki nastaja tako v apneni kot tudi v cementnih maltah. Ugotovili so, da dodatek olivina
izolira atmosferski CO2 in ga pretvori oziroma ve`e v magnezijev karbonat. Apnene malte ve`ejo ve~jo vsebnost atmosferskega
CO2 kot cementne in tvorijo trdne spojine.
Klju~ne besede: zajemanje atmosferskega ogljika, odstranjevanje atmosferskega ogljika, olivinski agregat
danger the environment due to the liberation of CO2.6 In Table 1: Oxide composition
general, the manufacture of one tonne of cement emits Percentage of oxides
an equivalent quantity of CO2 into the atmosphere, ac- Oxide components
Lime Cement
counting for 7 % of the world CO2 emissions.7 The con- CaO 63.2 66.67
struction sector also relies on non-renewable resources to MgO 0.161 0.87
generate aggregates, which account for around 60–75 % SiO2 19.94 18.91
of the total concrete volume.8 Al2 O3 4.315 4.51
Knowing from the past, lime mortars were the key Fe2 O3 1.833 4.94
materials used over the centuries for the ancient struc-
tures. The hardening of lime mortars occurs through the
process called carbonation. It involves an interaction of 2.2 Aggregates
calcium hydroxide with atmospheric CO2 to form a sta- Two types of aggregates are selected for the study,
ble compound, calcium carbonate (CaCO3).9 Hence the namely river sand and olivine aggregate. The river sand
carbonation is also called the natural way of sequestering is procured locally and the gradation of aggregates is
atmospheric CO2 from the environment and converting it done through a sieve analysis.13 Olivine is procured from
into a stable product and this technique is similar to the Industrial Minerals & Refractories, Tamil Nadu, India.
mineral carbonation in the CCU technique. The obtained olivine aggregates are ground into fine par-
In recent years, researchers have identified another ticles of a size not exceeding 65 μm.
important mineral, called olivine that could help to con-
vert atmospheric CO2 into stable carbonates. In general, 2.3 Mix proportions
olivine is a naturally occurring mineral with varying pro-
portions of magnesium to iron, combined with silicates. Two sets of samples are prepared to investigate the
It is usually identified in mafic and ultramafic igneous role of olivine aggregate in both lime and cement mor-
rocks. Based on the amounts of magnesium and iron, tars. Set 1 comprises lime sand (LS), lime olivine (LO)
they are named as forsterite (MgSiO4) and fayalite and Set 2 includes cement sand (CS), cement olivine
(Fe2SiO4). Fasihnikoutalab et al.10 studied the role of ol- (CO). For both sets of mortars, a 1:3 binder-to-aggregate
ivine aggregate in the stabilization of soils. The study ratio is adopted with 0.65 (lime) and 0.45 (cement) as the
concluded that an addition of olivine aggregates im- binder-to-water ratios. Initially, one part of binder
proved the unconfined soil strength by 120 % when com- (lime/cement) and three parts of aggregate (fine aggre-
pared with the reference one. They also stated that the gate/olivine aggregate) are weighed separately and
precipitation of magnesite was found, which could be the mixed thoroughly to attain a uniform state. The grinding
reason behind the improved strength. Westgate et al.11 of two sets of mortars are done in a separate paddle
discussed the role of olivine aggregate in lime mortars. mixer. Many researchers have discussed the chemical in-
The research confirmed that fine-sized olivine aggregates compatibility of lime and cement mortars. Hence, while
underwent dissolution in the lime alkaline environment mixing the mortars, proper care should be taken to avoid
and stable magnesium carbonate precipitated in compari- intermixing. After preparing the mortars as per IS 6932
son to references mortars. The authors also explained (Part VII): 197314 (Hydraulic lime) and IS 2550 : 198115
that the added olivine aggregate plays a dual role, replac- (Cement mortars), the mortar mix is shifted into moulds
ing fine aggregates and helping the sequestration of car- with a size of 50 mm × 50 mm in three layers with
bon dioxide from the atmosphere. Thus, in the current proper compaction to ensure the voids are reduced. Ce-
study the authors attempted to examine the carbon-cap- ment mortar is demoulded after 24 h and kept at a tem-
ture ability of both lime and cement mortar with olive perature of 27 ± 2 °C and 75 % relative humidity and
aggregates. Analytical techniques like XRD and TGA lime mortar is demoulded after 3 d and cured at the same
were conducted to identify the hydrated phases devel- conditions.
oped in the mortars.
2.4 Analytical techniques
2 EXPERIMENTAL PART After the curing period, the core portion of the cube
2.1 Binder is crushed thoroughly and passed through a 45 micron
sieve. The sieved (passed) material is examined with an-
Natural hydraulic lime and cement are chosen as alytical tests, X-ray diffraction (XRD) and TGA (thermal
binders for the proposed study. Both binders are pro- gravimetric analysis). The XRD of the samples is carried
cured from commercial suppliers from Vellore, India. out using BRUKER D8 Advance (Germany) with Cu Ka
Hydraulic lime conforms to class A according to IS 712: radiation (0.15406 nm), a Lynxeye detector (silicon-strip
1984;12 the chemical composition is presented in Ta- detector technology), and a Ni filter, detecting the crys-
ble 1. The lime exhibits nearly 24 % of clay impurities, talline phases present in the mortars. TGA is conducted
hence it is categorised as eminently hydraulic in nature. to identify the weight loss of various hydrated phases de-
Ordinary Portland cement (OPC) of grade 53 is used. veloped in both lime and cement mortars.16
Figure 2: a) LO, LS, b) CO, CS; P: portlandite; G: gismondine; B: brucite; T: tobermorite; C: calcite; M: magnesite; A: aragonite; D: dolomite;
Q: quartz; E: ettringite
intensive peaks of aragonite, dolomite, calcite and traces 3.3 TGA analysis
of brucite. The reason behind the domination of crystal-
Combined TGA and DTA graphs of lime and cement
line phases compared to amorphous phases could be the
natural carbonation of mortars (CS, CO) (a temperature mortars are depicted in Figures 3a and 3b; the weight
of 28 °C and RH of 65 %). Cizar et al.20 discussed the losses of both mortars are presented in Table 1. In the
competition of hydration and carbonation in hydraulic temperature range below 120 °C, weight losses of
mortars under standard conditions. These authors con- 0.27 % and 0.3 % are observed for lime and olivine mor-
cluded that hydration is followed by a carbonation pro- tars, representing a low level of hygroscopic water.
cess. Based on the above discussion, the final conclusion Weight losses of 4.36 % and 4.44 % (120–420 °C) are
is that lime mortars have a natural CO2 sequestration identified in lime reference and lime/olivine mortars.
ability, but an addition of olivine improves the sequestra- This could be due to the weight loss of the clay impuri-
tion process, which is evident due to the greater intensity ties present in lime, while the slight increase in the
peaks observed in the mortars with added olivine. The weight loss of olivine mortars could be attributed to the
olivine mortars also show the major strength giving com- presence of brucite. In the temperature range of
pounds due to the presence of magnesium ions. 400–600 °C, weight losses of 2.62 % and 2.96 % are ob-
served in LS and LO mortars. The weight loss in both
Figure 3: a) LS – 28, b) LO – 28
Figure 4: a) CS – 28, b) CO – 28
mortars is due to the decomposition of uncarbonated olivine-based mortars have a greater ability to capture at-
portlandite present in the samples. In addition, the mospheric CO2.
greater weight loss in LO mortar is due to the decompo-
sition of magnesite. The fall in weight at 600–800 °C is
due to the release of CO2 from the polymorph of calcium 4 CONCLUSIONS
carbonate (aragonite, calcite) in LS mortars.16 The
greater weight losses in LO mortars are due to the forma- An addition of olivine aggregates greatly improves
tion of dolomite along with calcium carbonate poly- the properties of both lime and cement mortars. The
morphs. The XRD results also depict the presence of ad- strength gains in both mortars are due to the formation of
ditional minerals like brucite, magnesite and dolomite in magnesium-bearing compounds magnesite and dolomite,
the lime/olivine mortar. which is confirmed with analytical techniques, XRD and
Significant mass losses of 7.6 (CS) and 7.7 % (CO) TGA. These compounds are formed due to the interac-
are observed in the range of 120–420 °C due to the loss tion of carbonate ions with dissolute magnesium ions in
in the surface water, dehydration of C-S-H and decompo- both mortars. During the process of hardening of olivine
sition of ettringite and brucite (Table 2). The weight mortars (lime, cement), olivine sequesters atmospheric
losses in cement olivine mortars are greater than in lime CO2 and forms a stable compound. Hence, the adoption
mortars due to a greater decomposition of calcium sili- of olivine aggregate in binding mortars is highly advis-
cates and aluminates along with brucite. DSC depicted able as it improves the properties of both mortars and re-
an exothermic reaction in the temperature range of duces the carbon footprint on the environment, acting as
400–600 °C, which can be attributed to the dehydration a carbon capture and sequestration unit.
of portlandite and magnesite. A weight loss of 5.01 % is
found in CO mortars compared to 3.27 % in CS mortars
in the temperature range of 600–800 °C. The increase in 5 REFERENCES
the weight loss of CO mortars is due to the decomposi- 1
P. K. Mehta, P. J. Monteiro, Concrete: microstructure, properties, and
tion of calcium carbonate along with dolomite. DSC materials, McGraw-Hill Education, 2014
curves show endothermic reactions in the same tempera- 2
R. M. Cuéllar-Franca, A. Azapagic, Carbon capture, storage and uti-
ture range. The decomposition of calcium carbonate is lisation technologies: A critical analysis and comparison of their life
shifted before 800 °C, which can be due to the formation cycle environmental impacts, Journal of CO2 Utilization, 9 (2015),
of metastable calcium carbonates (Figures 4a and 4b). 82–102, doi:10.1016/j.jcou.2014.12.001
3
K. M. K. Yu, I. Curcic, J. Gabriel S. C. E. Tsang, Recent advances in
Hence, the increased weight loss in both LO and CO CO2 capture and utilization, ChemSusChem: Chemistry &
mortars is due to the interaction of finely ground forster- Sustainability, Energy & Materials, 1 (2008) 11, 893–899,
ite compounds with atmospheric CO2, confirming that doi:10.1002/cssc.200800169
4 13
J. Li., Mechanical activation of ultramafic mine waste materials for ISO 2386 (Part I): 1963 – Method of test for aggregate and con-
enhanced mineral carbonation, The University of British Columbia, crete-particle size and shape, New Delhi, India, Bureau of Indian
2017, doi:10.14288/1.0343400 Standards
5 14
S. Mindess, Sustainability of concrete, In: Developments in the For- ISO 6932 (Part VII): 1973 – Methods of tests for building limes, De-
mulation and Reinforcement of Concrete, 2019, 3–17, termination of compressive and transverse strengths, New Delhi, In-
doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-102616-8.00001-0 dia, Bureau of Indian Standards
6 15
A. Naqi, J. G. Jang, Recent progress in green cement technology uti- ISO 2550: 1981 – Code of practice for preparation of masonry mor-
lizing low-carbon emission fuels and raw materials: A review, tars, New Delhi, India, Bureau of Indian Standards
Sustainability, 11 (2019) 2, 537, doi:10.3390/su11020537 16
S. P. Saridhe, T. Selvaraj, Reporting the ancient green construction
7
L. K. Turner, F. G. Collins, Carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2) emis- technology of limecrete slabs adopted in Udaipur, Rajasthan, Journal
sions: A comparison between geopolymer and OPC cement concrete, of Cleaner Production, 279 (2021), 123682, doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.
Construction and Building Materials, 43 (2013), 125–130, 2020.123682
doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.01.023 17
M. H. Fasihnikoutalab, P. Westgate, B. B. K. Huat, A. Asadi, R. J.
8
P. B. Cachim, Mechanical properties of brick aggregate concrete, Ball, H. Nahazanan, P. Singh, New insights into potential capacity of
Construction and Building Materials, 23 (2009) 3, 1292–1297, olivine in ground improvement, Electron. J. Geotech. Eng., 20
doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.07.023 (2015), 2137–2148
9 18
R. M. Lawrence, T. J. Mays, S. P. Rigby, P. Walker, D. D’Ayala, Ef- G. Cultrone, E. Sebastián, M. O. Huertas, Forced and natural carbon-
fects of carbonation on the pore structure of non-hydraulic lime mor- ation of lime-based mortars with and without additives: Mineralogi-
tars, Cement and Concrete Research, 37 (2007) 7, 1059–1069, cal and textural changes, Cement and Concrete Research, 35 (2005)
doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.04.011 12, 2278–2289, doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.12.012
10 19
M. H. Fasihnikoutalab, A. Asadi, B. K. Huat, P. Westgate, R. J. Ball, M. Singh, S. V. Kumar, S. A. Waghmare, P. D. Sabale, Aragon-
S. Pourakbar, Laboratory-scale model of carbon dioxide deposition ite–vaterite–calcite: Polymorphs of CaCO3 in 7th century CE lime
for soil stabilisation, Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical plasters of Alampur group of temples, India, Construction and Build-
Engineering, 8 (2016) 2, 178–186, doi:10.1016/j.jrmge.2015.11.001 ing Materials, 112 (2016), 386–397, doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.
11
P. Westgate, R. J. Ball, K. Paine, Olivine as a reactive aggregate in 2016.02.191
20
lime mortars, Construction and Building Materials, 195 (2019), Ö. Cizer, K. Van Balen, D. A. Van Gemert, Competition between
115–126, doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.062 hydration and carbonation in hydraulic lime and lime-pozzolana
12
ISO 712: 1984 – Specification for building limes, New Delhi, India, mortars, Advanced Materials Research, 133 (2010), 241–246,
Bureau of Indian Standards doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.133-134.241