Cordesman 2019DefenseWhite 2019
Cordesman 2019DefenseWhite 2019
Cordesman 2019DefenseWhite 2019
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize,
preserve and extend access to this content.
25
It describes China as trying to bring Asia together in peaceful cooperation through organization like the Shanghai Cooperation Council, the
China-ASEAN Defense Ministers’ Informal Meeting, and the ASEAN Defense Ministers’ Meeting Plus (ADMM-Plus). In contrast, the Chinese
White Paper states that,
the region has become a focus of major country competition, bringing uncertainties to regional security. The US is strengthening its Asia-Pacific military alliances
and reinforcing military deployment and intervention, adding complexity to regional security. The deployment of the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense
(THAAD) system in the Republic of Korea (ROK) by the US has severely undermined the regional strategic balance and the strategic security interests of regional
countries.
It describes Taiwan, Tibetan, and Turkistan separatists as China’s main threats, the dangers of disputes over territory, and again highlights the
U.S. by noting that, “Countries from outside the region conduct frequent close-in reconnaissance on China by air and sea, and illegally enter
China’s territorial waters and the waters and airspace near China’s islands and reefs, undermining China’s national security.”
. 26
Source: Quotes are excerpted from China’s National Defense in a New Era, July 2019,
http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/download/whitepaperonnationaldefenseinnewera.doc
This content downloaded from
103.117.160.135 on Sun, 17 Dec 2023 09:29:18 +00:00
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
The Chinese White Paper also describes the modernization and expansion of Chinese military forces as being almost totally defensive:
“China’s military security is confronted by risks from technology surprise and growing technological generation gap. Greater efforts have to
be invested in military modernization to meet national security demands. The PLA still lags far behind the world’s leading militaries.” It also
declares that,
Though a country may become strong, bellicosity will lead to its ruin. The Chinese nation has always loved peace. Since the beginning of modern times, the
Chinese people have suffered from aggressions and wars, and have learned the value of peace and the pressing need for development. Therefore, China will
never inflict such sufferings on any other country. Since its founding 70 years ago, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never started any war or conflict.
Since the introduction of reform and opening-up, China has been committed to promoting world peace, and has voluntarily downsized the PLA by over 4 million
troops. China has grown from a poor and weak country to be the world’s second largest economy neither by receiving handouts from others nor by engaging in
military expansion or colonial plunder. Instead, it has developed through its people’s hard work and its efforts to maintain peace. China has made every effort to
create favorable conditions for its development through maintaining world peace, and has equally endeavored to promote world peace through its own
development. China sincerely hopes that all countries will choose the path of peaceful development and jointly prevent conflicts and wars.
The White Paper portrays the U.S. as the power that is making sweeping increase in military spending and is the more aggressive power. It
totally ignores the comparative rises in actual U.S. and Chinese military expenditures, and the fact that the fact that China only reports a
limited part of its true military expenditures. It instead claims that the U.S. is spending 2.7 times more of its economy (3.5% of GDP vs. 1.3%
for China) on military forces, and nearly twice the percentage of its total government expenditures (9.8% vs. 5.3%).
At the same time, the defense White Paper goes on to address virtually every major aspect of Chinese military activity and development as
peaceful. For example, it deals with the South China Sea issue by stating that,
China’s armed forces defend important waters, islands and reefs in the East China Sea, the South China Sea and the Yellow Sea, acquire full situation awareness
of adjacent waters, conduct joint rights protection and law enforcement operations, properly handle maritime and air situations, and resolutely respond to
security threats, infringements and provocations on the sea. Since 2012, China’s armed forces have deployed vessels on over 4,600 maritime security patrols
and 72,000 rights protection and law enforcement operations, and safeguarded maritime peace, stability and order…China’s armed forces conduct air defense,
reconnaissance and early warning, monitor China’s territorial air and peripheral air space, carry out alert patrols and combat takeoff, and effectively respond to
emergencies and threats to maintain order and security in the air…Aiming at safeguarding national unity, China’s armed forces strengthen military preparedness
with emphasis on the sea. By sailing ships and flying aircraft around Taiwan, the armed forces send a stern warning to the “Taiwan independence” separatist
forces.
Yet, it is also important to note that in some ways, the Chinese White Paper is more moderate in its treatment of the U.S. than the U.S.
strategy papers issue in 2017 and 2018 were in discussing military developments in China,
China actively and properly handles its military relationship with the US in accordance with the principles of non-conflict, non-confrontation, mutual respect and
win-win cooperation. It strives to make the military-to-military relationship a stabilizer for the relations between the two countries and hence contribute to the
China-US relationship based on coordination, cooperation and stability. In 2014, China’s Ministry of National Defense (MND) and the US Department of Defense
27
28
32
Source: China’s National Defense in a New Era, July 2019, http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/download/whitepaperonnationaldefenseinnewera.doc
This content downloaded from
103.117.160.135 on Sun, 17 Dec 2023 09:29:18 +00:00
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms