Class Activity - Rhetorical Situation Group Project
Class Activity - Rhetorical Situation Group Project
Class Activity - Rhetorical Situation Group Project
In groups, read the assigned text and make notes on the following questions.
Be prepared to share your ideas as a group with the class. Each person in the group will
contribute.
Questions
1. Who is the intended audience of the text? Is it targeted towards a specific group or a more
general audience?
2. What is the purpose of the text? Is it meant to inform, persuade, entertain, or something else?
The purpose of the test is to inform the readers about the benefit of mindfulness.
3. What is the context in which the text was created? Consider the time period, cultural
Mindfulness isn’t considered ‘important’ for engineers, but this article tries to push the idea that
4. What is the author's background or expertise in relation to the topic? Does their expertise lend
The authors of this article range from engineers to professional psychologists, leading us to
5. What is the author's tone or attitude towards the subject? Is it neutral, passionate, critical, or
something else?
It could be said that the authors are extremely passionate about the topic but remain closely
6. What are the main arguments or claims presented in the text? How does the author support
Their main claim is pushing that the field of engineering requires people with a creative and
innovative mindset. They support their claims with various studies and experiments.
7. How does the author appeal to the audience's emotions, logic, or ethics? Are there any specific
The authors use many facts and evidence, making sure they stick to the point. The assumption
that most of their readers would be engineers could be the reason to this.
Pathos is used in the given article: bringing up relatable engineering experiences paired with
8. What are the potential biases or assumptions present in the text? How might these influence
On the studies provided, there is a chance that the participants of the study were chosen with
bias. This could change the whole result of the study and fight against instead of for the topic.