Computational Study and Experimental Validation of The Heat
Computational Study and Experimental Validation of The Heat
Computational Study and Experimental Validation of The Heat
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: The numerical investigation of the heat ventilation and thermal comfort evaluation in a living room
Received 20 December 2015 with a patio system was undertaken using a validated computational fluid dynamic (CFD) model. The
Accepted 5 March 2016 Reynolds averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) modeling approach with the k–ε turbulence model was used
Available online 9 March 2016
for the numerical investigations. The steady-state governing equations were solved using the software
SolidWorks Flow Simulation. Based on the various flow simulations, the numerical results obtained for
Keywords:
the temperature distributions, the airflow patterns and the turbulence characteristics inside the building
Living room
were presented. Using the numerical results, it was noticed that the choice of the building design can
Patio system
Heat ventilation
improve comfort conditions by modifying the microclimate of the building and by enhancing the airflow
Air flow in it. Indeed, it was found that patio system can be useful of a heat source in the building.
CFD © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.03.016
0378-7788/© 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
S. Driss et al. / Energy and Buildings 119 (2016) 28–40 29
2. Geometrical apparatus
∂H ∂ui H ∂ ∂ ∂u
+ = uj ij + ijR + qi + − ijR i
Fig. 1 presents a living room prototype with a height h = 0.24 m, ∂t ∂xi ∂xi ∂t ∂xj
a width w = 0.21 m and a length l = 0.33 m. In this system, two holes
+ε + Si ui + QH (3)
placed in the same face were considered. The first hole, placed at
a distance h1 = 0.05 m from the floor, is used to stoke the air flow
(i,j = 1, 2, 3)
from the patio placed near the living room. The second hole, placed
at a distance h2 = 0.17 m from the base, permits the evacuation of u2
the air from the living room to the patio system. In fact, the air H =h+ (4)
2
flow comes from the patio located in the building center. This patio,
with transparent roofing, can stock the heat energy in winter. By where is the density (kg m−3 ), t is the time (s), xi and xj are the
connecting this patio to the adjacent rooms, it is possible to create Cartesian coordinate, ui and uj are the velocity components (m s−1 )
a circulation of the heat flow which can be distributed according respectively on the i and j direction, p is the pressure (Pa), is
to the building design. However, in the experimental investigation the viscosity (Pa s), ıij is the Kronecker delta function, Fi is the force
we have used an air heater to supply the living room. component on the i direction (N), Si is the mass-distributed external
force per unit mass (kg m−2 s−2 ), h is the thermal enthalpy (J kg−1 ),
3. Numerical model QH is the heat source per unit volume (kg m−1 s−3 ), ij is the viscous
shear stress tensor (Pa), qi is the diffusive heat flux (J).
3.1. Mathematical formulation The energy equation is written as follows:
p
The mathematical description of the present model is based ∂E ∂ui E + ∂ ∂u
+ = uj ij + ijR + qi − ijR i
on the Navier–Stokes equations, [27–31] which in a conservative ∂t ∂xi ∂xi ∂xj
formulation are given as:
+ε + Si ui + QH (5)
∂ ∂(ui )
+ =0 (1)
∂t ∂xi
u2
∂(ui ) ∂(ui uj ) ∂p ∂ E =e+ (6)
+ + = ij + ijR + Si i = 1, 2, 3 (2) 2
∂t ∂xj ∂xi ∂xj
where e is the internal energy (J kg−1 ).
S. Driss et al. / Energy and Buildings 119 (2016) 28–40 31
For Newtonian fluids, the viscous shear stress tensor is defined here ıij is the Kronecker delta function (it is equal to unity when i = j,
as: and zero otherwise), is the dynamic viscosity, t is the turbulent
viscosity (Pa s) and k is the turbulent kinetic energy (J kg−1 ).
∂ui ∂ui 2 ∂uk In the frame of the k–ε turbulence model, t is defined using two
ij = + − ıij (7)
∂xj ∂xj 3 ∂xk basic turbulence properties, namely, the turbulent kinetic energy k
(J kg−1 ) and the turbulent dissipation ε (W kg−1 ):
Following Boussinesq assumption, the Reynolds-stress tensor has
the form:
∂ui ∂uj 2 ∂uk 2 C k2
ijR = t + − ıij − kıij (8)
∂xj ∂xi 3 ∂xk 3 t = f (9)
ε
32 S. Driss et al. / Energy and Buildings 119 (2016) 28–40
here f is the turbulent viscosity factor. It is defined by the expres- here the constant c = 0.9, Pr is the Prandt l number, and h is the
sion: thermal enthalpy (J kg−1 ). These equations describe both laminar
20, 5
and turbulent flows. Moreover, transitions from one case to another
f = [1 − exp(−0.025Ry)]2 1 + (10) and back are possible.
RT
For an ideal gas, the pressure is given by the state law of perfect
where gases:
k2 p = RT = ( − 1) e (14)
Rt = (11)
ε
√ Two additional transport equations are used to describe the turbu-
ky lent kinetic energy and dissipation:
Ry = (12)
∂k
∂(k) ∂(ui k) ∂ t
and y is the distance from the wall. + = + + Sk (15)
∂t ∂xi ∂xi k ∂xj
The diffusive heat flux is defined as:
∂h ∂ε
t ∂(ε) ∂(ui ε) ∂ t
qi = + (13) + = + + Sε (16)
Pr c ∂xi ∂t ∂xi ∂xi ε ∂xj
34 S. Driss et al. / Energy and Buildings 119 (2016) 28–40
where gi is the component of gravitational acceleration in direction The constants C , Cε1 , Cε2 , k and ε are defined empirically. In Flow
xi , the constant B = 0.9, and the constant CB is defined as: Simulation, the following typical values are presented in Table 1.
S. Driss et al. / Energy and Buildings 119 (2016) 28–40 35
3.2. Boundary conditions been changed based on the cells number. Then, the obtained results
has been compared to the experimental velocity values collected
For the boundary conditions, we have considered that the heat from the experimental invesigation. For thus, four meshes have
flow stoke the living room from the patio with a velocity inlet equal been tested. The first case to be set corresponds to a coarse mesh
to V = 3.4 m s−1 and a temperature T = 37 ◦ C measured in the first with 3552 cells (Fig. 3a). The second case corresponds to 22,584
hole. From the second hole, the air flow is evacuated from the liv- cells (Fig. 3b). The third case corresponds to 64,656 cells (Fig. 3c).
ing room to an area of static atmospheric pressure. For thus, we The fourth case corresponds to a refined mesh with 68,446 cells
have imposed in the second hole an outlet pressure with a value of (Fig. 3d). The corresponding time calculation and number of itera-
101,325 Pa. Knowing that the living room prototype is presented in tions for these different simulation are presented in Table 2. In the
our domain, the roof and the lateral surface of the building and the considered plane X = 0.06 m containing the two holes and the super-
wall of the computational domain are considered as a wall bound- position of the velocity profiles in the differents directions defined
ary condition. A summary of the boundary conditions is given in by Z = −0.03 m, Z = −0.09 m, Z = −0.12 m and Z = −0.18 m are pre-
Fig. 2. sented in Fig. 4. The numerical results gathered from the CFD code
and the experimental results taken by the aneometer are super-
posed. The measure velocity values are made by positioning the
3.3. Meshing effect and experimental validation probe of the anemometer for each controlling point and by collect-
ing the velocity value of the air flow. According to these results,
In this section, we have interested on the mesh resolution’s it has been observed that the velocity profiles seems to have the
influence on flow simulation results. In fact, the size of the mesh has
36 S. Driss et al. / Energy and Buildings 119 (2016) 28–40
Table 2
Characteristic of different meshes.
Number of cells Number of the partial cells Time calculation Number of iterations
same appearance but the velocity values depends on the cell size. 4. Numerical results
It is clear that the velocity value obtained for the fourth case is
the closest to the experimentally measured value. Also, it has been As presented in Fig. 5, six planes defined by X = 0.06 m, X = 0.18 m,
noted that the resolution time increases with the decrease of the Y = 0.06 m, Y = 0.18 m, Z = −0.03 m, and Z = −0.18 m are considered
size of mesh cells. Indeed, the greater the cell size gets the more to visualize, the velocity field, the average velocity, the tempera-
the gap between numerical and experimental results is large. Our ture, the static pressure, the dynamic pressure, the turbulent kinetic
choice leads to a better result with regards to the precision and the energy, the turbulent viscosity, the dissipation rate of the turbulent
resolution time.
S. Driss et al. / Energy and Buildings 119 (2016) 28–40 37
kinetic energy and the turbulent viscosity. In these condition, the larly, a discharge area is created from the hole and continues until
Reynolds number is equal to Re = 5100. the opposite wall. While approaching to this wall, a rapid decrease
of the velocity field until V = 1.13 m s−1 has been observed. With the
direction change, this flow creates two recirculation zones in the
4.1. Velocity field
whole area of the living room. These zones are characterized by a
low speed values not exceeding V = 0.9 m s−1 . Their form depends
Fig. 6 shows the distribution of the velocity field in the planes
on the visualization planes. By approaching to the holes outlet situ-
defined by the positions X = 0.06 m, X = 0.18 m, Y = 0.06 m, Y = 0.18 m,
ated at the top of the living room, the speed increases slightly until
Z = −0.03 m and Z = −0.18 m. Based on these results, it’s clear that
reaching V = 2.8 m s−1 .
the average speed is maximal at the hole inlet situated in the con-
sidered living room. In reality, the air flow comes from the patio
located in the building center. This patio, with transparent roofing, 4.2. Temperature
can stock great heat energy in winter. By connecting this patio to the
adjacent rooms, it is possible to create a heat flow which can be dis- Fig. 7 shows the distribution of the temperature in the planes
tributed according to the building design. At this level, the average defined by the positions X = 0.06 m, X = 0.18 m, Y = 0.06 m, Y = 0.18 m,
velocity reaches a maximum value equal to V = 3.4 m s−1 . Particu- Z = −0.03 m and Z = −0.18 m. According to these results, it has been
38 S. Driss et al. / Energy and Buildings 119 (2016) 28–40
Fig. 11. Taux de distribution of the dissapation rate of the turbulent kinetic energy.
observed that the temperature is governed by the boundary con- sion zone appears in the holes inlet situated in the considered living
dition, in the hole inlet which the air flow is equal to T = 37 ◦ C. This room. During the air progress, the static pressure decreases slightly.
value decreases slightly in the computation domain and reaches After that, it increases close the opposite wall and the different cor-
the lowest value in the hole outlet. In this case, it is interesting to ners and reaches the maximum value equal to p = 101,332 Pa. In
note that the difference between the temperature values is very the holes outlet, the static pressure is governed by the atmospheric
low. This fact is due to of the flow forced convection. condition value equal to p = 101,325 Pa.
Fig. 8 shows the distribution of the static pressure in planes Fig. 9 presents the dynamic pressure in the planes defined by the
defined by the positions X = 0.06 m, X = 0.18 m, Y = 0.06 m, Y = 0.18 m, positions X = 0.06 m, X = 0.18 m, Y = 0.06 m, Y = 0.18 m, Z = −0.03 m
Z = −0.03 m and Z = −0.18 m. According to these results, a compres- and Z = −0.18 m. Based on these results, we find a compression zone
S. Driss et al. / Energy and Buildings 119 (2016) 28–40 39
characteristic of the maximum value of the dynamic pressure in the kinetic energy appear in the inferior corner of the opposite wall
discharge area located between the holes inlet and the opposed and the holes outlet situated at the top of the living room. In these
wall. Outside of this zone, the dynamic pressure decreases before areas, the maximum value of the turbulent kinetic energy is about
increasing in the holes outlet. k = 0.4 J kg−1 . Outside of this area, the value of the turbulent kinetic
energy becomes very weak rapidly.
4.5. Turbulent kinetic energy
4.6. Dissipation rate of the turbulent kinetic energy
Fig. 10 shows the distribution of the turbulent kinetic energy in
the planes defined by the positions X = 0.06 m, X = 0.18 m, Y = 0.06 m, Fig. 11 presents the distribution of the dissipation rate of
Y = 0.18 m, Z = −0.03 m and Z = −0.18 m. According to these results, the turbulent kinetic energy in the planes defined by the posi-
it has been observed that the turbulent kinetic energy is low at the tions X = 0.06 m, X = 0.18 m, Y = 0.06 m, Y = 0.18 m, Z = −0.03 m and
holes inlet situated in the considered living room. While approach- Z = −0.18 m. According to these results, it’s clear that the dissipation
ing to the opposite wall, its value increases progressively. The rate of the turbulent kinetic energy is low at the holes inlet situated
wakes characteristics of the maximum values of the turbulent in the considered living room. While approaching to the opposite
40 S. Driss et al. / Energy and Buildings 119 (2016) 28–40
wall, its value increases progressively. The wakes characteristics of energy needs used to prevent the overheating of buildings in the summer,
the maximum values of the dissipation rate of the turbulent kinetic Energy 36 (2011) 3262–3271.
[7] A.J. Marszal, P. Heiselberg, Life cycle cost analysis of a multi-storey residential
energy appear in the inferior corner of the opposite wall and the net zero energy building in Denmark, Energy 36 (2011) 5600–5609.
holes outlet situated at the top of the living room. In these areas, [8] M. Sorsak, V.Z. Leskovar, M. Premrov, D. Goricanec, I. Psunder, Economical
the maximum value of the dissipation rate of the turbulent kinetic optimization of energy-efficient timber buildings: case study for single family
timber house in Slovenia, Energy 77 (2014) 57–65.
energy is about k = 2 W kg−1 . Outside of this area, the value of the [9] E. Pikas, M. Thalfeldt, J. Kurnitski, R. Liias, Extra cost analyses of two
dissipation rate of the turbulent kinetic energy is very weak. apartment buildings for achieving nearly zero and low energy buildings,
Energy 84 (2015) 623–633.
[10] A.S. Yang, C.Y. Wen, Y.H. Juan, Y.M. Su, J.H. Wu, Using the central ventilation
4.7. Turbulent viscosity
shaft design within public buildings for natural aeration enhancement,
Applied Thermal Engineering 70 (2014) 219–230.
Fig. 12 shows the distribution of the turbulent viscosity in the [11] M. Premrov, V.Z. Leskovar, K. Mihalic, Influence of the building shape on the
energy performance of timber-glass buildings in different climatic conditions,
planes defined by the positions X = 0.06 m, X = 0.18 m, Y = 0.06 m,
Energy (2015) 1–11, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.05.027.
Y = 0.18 m, Z = −0.03 m and Z = −0.18 m. According to these results, [12] O. Iruleg, L. Torres, A. Serra, I. Mendizabal, R. Hernández, The Ekihouse: an
it has been observed that the turbulent viscosity is low at the holes energy self-sufficient house based on passive design strategies, Energy Build.
inlet situated in the considered living room. While approaching to 83 (2014) 57–69.
[13] J. He, A. Hoyano, A 3D CAD-based simulation tool for prediction and
the opposite wall, its value increases progressively. The wakes char- evaluation of the thermal improvement effect of passive cooling walls in the
acteristics of the maximum values of the turbulent viscosity appear developed urban locations, Solar Energy 83 (2009) 1064–1075.
in the inferior corner of the opposite wall and the holes outlet situ- [14] X. Du, R. Bokel, A.V.D. Dobbelsteen, Building microclimate and summer
thermal comfort in free-running buildings with diverse spaces: a Chinese
ated at the top of the living room. In these areas, the maximum value vernacular house case, Build. Environ. 822 (2014) 15–227.
of the turbulent viscosity is about t = 2 Pa s. Outside of this area, [15] M. Macias, A. Mateo, M. Schuler, E.M. Mitre, Application of night cooling
the value of the turbulent viscosity becomes very weak rapidly. concept to social housing design in dry hot climate, Energy Build. 38 (2006)
1104–1110.
[16] W. Luo, Z. Dong, G. Qian, J. Lu, Wind tunnel simulation of the
5. Conclusion three-dimensional airflow patterns behind cuboid obstacles at different
angles of wind incidence, and their significance for the formation of sand
shadows, Geomorphology 139 (140) (2012) 258–270.
In this paper, we have developed a computational study and [17] A. Tamayol, B. Firoozabadi, G. Ahmadi, Determination of settling tanks
experimental validation of the heat ventilation in a living room with performance using an Eulerian–Lagrangian method, J. Appl. Fluid Mech. 1
a solar patio system located in the building center. This patio, with (2008) 43–54.
[18] S. Sumon, M.d. Arif Hasan Mamun, M. Zakir Hossain, A.K.M. Sadrul Islam,
transparent roofing, can stock great heat energy in winter. By con-
Mixed convection in an enclosure with different inlet and exit configurations,
necting this patio to the adjacent rooms, it is possible to create a J. Appl. Fluid Mech. 1 (2008) 78–93.
heat flow which can be distributed according to the building design. [19] A.R. Rahmati, M. Ashrafizaadeh, A generalized lattice Boltzmann method for
three-dimensional incompressible fluid flow simulation, J. Appl. Fluid Mech. 2
These solutions can improve the comfort conditions by modifying
(1) (2009) 71–96.
the microclimate of the building and by enhancing the airflow in [20] T. Bunsri, M. Sivakumar, D. Hagare, Applications of hydraulic properties
it. In fact, by connecting this patio to the adjacent rooms, it is pos- models on microscopic flow in unsaturated porous media, J. Appl. Fluid Mech.
sible to create a heat flow which can be distributed according to 2 (2009) 1–11.
[21] S. Boixo, M. Diaz-Vicente, A. Colmenar, M.A. Castro, Potential energy savings
the building design. In this application, a discharge area is created from cool roofs in Spain and Andalusia, Energy 38 (2012) 425–438.
from the holes inlet and continues until the opposite wall. This flow [22] M. Ibrahim, E. Wurtz, P.H. Biwole, P. Achard, Transferring the south solar
creates two recirculation zones in the whole area of the room. By energy to the north facade through embedded water pipes, Energy 78 (2014)
834–845.
approaching to the holes outlet situated at the top of the living [23] Y. Nam, H.-B. Chae, Numerical simulation for the optimum design of ground
room, the speed increases slightly. These results present very inter- source heat pump system using building foundation as horizontal heat
esting ideas to provide buildings the heat energy by using a solar exchanger, Energy 73 (2014) 933–942.
[24] G.A. Faggianelli, A. Brun, E. Wurtz, M. Muselli, Natural cross ventilation in
patio system. buildings on Mediterranean coastal zones, Energy Build. 77 (2014) 206–218.
In the future, we propose to work on methods stored energy to [25] M.Z.I. Bangalee, J.J. Miau, S.Y. Lin, J.H. Yang, Flow visualization, PIV
assume a continuous end heating with zero energy. measurement and CFD calculation for fluid-driven natural cross-ventilation in
a scale mode, Energy Build. 66 (2013) 306–314.
[26] C. Teodosiu, F. Kuznik, R. Teodosiu, CFD modeling of buoyancy driven cavities
References with internal heat source: application to heated rooms, Energy Build. 68
(2014) 403–411.
[1] H.J. Han, Y.I. Jeon, S.H. Lim, W.W. Kim, K. Chen, New developments in [27] Z. Driss, Z.G. Bouzgarrou, W. Chtourou, H. Kchaou, M.S. Abid, Computational
illumination, heating and cooling technologies for energy-efficient buildings, studies of the pitched blade turbines design effect on the stirred tank flow
Energy 35 (2010) 2647–2653. characteristics, Eur. J. Mech. B/ Fluids (EJMF) 29 (2010) 236–245.
[2] A.L.S. Chan, Investigation on the appropriate floor level of residential building [28] M.W. Ammar Chtourou, Z. Driss, M.S. Abid, Numerical investigation of
for installing balcony, from a view point of energy and environmental turbulent flow generated in baffled stirred vessels equipped with three
performance. A case study in subtropical Hong Kong, Energy 85 (2015) different turbines in one and two-stage system, Energy 36 (8) (2011)
620–634. 5081–5093.
[3] R.Z. Homod, Assessment regarding energy saving and decoupling for different [29] S. Driss, Z. Driss, I. Kallel Kammoun, Study of the Reynolds number effect on
AHU (air handling unit) and control strategies in the hot-humid climatic the aerodynamic structure around an obstacle with inclined roof, Sustain.
region of Iraq, Energy 74 (2014) 762–774. Energy 2 (2014) 126–133.
[4] A. Rauf, Robert H. Crawford, Building service life and its effect on the life cycle [30] Z. Driss, O. Mlayeh, D. Driss, M. Maaloul, M.S. Abid, Numerical simulation and
embodied energy of buildings, Energy 79 (2015) 140–148. experimental validation of the turbulent flow around a small incurved
[5] S. Boixo, M. Diaz-Vicente, A. Colmenar, M.A. Castro, Potential energy savings Savonius wind rotor, Energy 74 (2014) 506–517.
from cool roofs in Spain and Andalusia, Energy 38 (2012) 425–438. [31] S. Driss, Z. Driss, I. Kallel Kammoun, Impact of shape of obstacle roof on the
[6] M.J.N. Oliveira Panão, S.M.L. Camelo, H.J.P. Gonçalves, Assessment of the turbulent flow in a wind tunnel, Am. J. Energy Res. 2 (4) (2014) 90–98.
Portuguese building thermal code: newly revised requirements for cooling