Global Managerial Economics
Global Managerial Economics
Global Managerial Economics
This assignment has been previously used in Global Managerial Economics class with Professor
Deborah McCafferty on/around October 20, 2013. The course number was ECON310 section 03
Ayesha Jackson
Table of Contents
Introduction to Topics......................................................................................................................3
Reference Page................................................................................................................................8
Globalization and Trade in Context 3
Introduction to Topics
As a business owner, I must approach the issue of globalization and trade in context.
With all the complicated tariff and nontariff trade policies, organizations, and government
involvement, the important question to ask is why the United States maintains certain economic
policies. In this assignment I will try to cover the effects of trade policies on a particular
industry. How international organizations affect business owners, will also be discussed; as well
as the roles the government plays in the trade policies. I will also focus on the automobile
U.S. foreign trade and global economic policies have transformed dramatically within the
two centuries that the United States has been a country. In the early periods of the country's
history, government and business generally focused on developing the domestic economy
irrespective of what went on abroad. However, in the meantime the Great Depression and World
War II, the nation in general has sought to decrease trade barriers and organize the world
economic system. The commitment to free trade has both economic and political backgrounds;
the United States increasingly has come to see open trade as a means not only of advancing its
own economic interests but also as a key to building peaceful relations among nations (State,
N.D). As global trade has developed consequently, so did the necessity for international
Globalization and Trade in Context 4
raises sales and revenues for U.S. businesses, as a result reinforcing the economy. Free trade also
builds jobs over the long-term in the United States for the middle class jobs. Simply put, it
allows for a chance for the United States to make available financial assistance to many of the
world's deprived countries. The best conclusion to this paragraph is economic assistances from
international trade arise simply because all countries do not have the same items in their
production capabilities. For instance one country may have different levels of education, or
merely because of the differences in natural resources, and/or technical knowledge, and so on.
Do the economic trade policies today help or hurt business owners and laborers?
GDP is a measure of all the goods and services produced domestically. In today's
progressively globalized world, exports and imports are crucial amounts in the exploration of a
country's economic state of affairs. Every time an economy slows down or moves faster, all other
economies are perhaps affected. Globalization is affectedly separating the connection amongst
American business firms and their personnel. There has always been conflict over the shares of
the benefits of worker productivity going to profits and wages. But up until recent times, we
must assume that mutually workers and businesses had a shared concern in manufacturing in
America. For instance, businesses turned out to be multinational, whether they truly
manufactured in America was beside the point when it comes down to their shareholders and
upper leaders. The person in charge may or may not be an American by birth or culture;
nevertheless she/he no longer acknowledged the prospect of the business with the future of
America. They were paid to invest where the cost of labor and environmental regulation was
Globalization and Trade in Context 5
cheapest (Jeff Faux, 2014 ). From the business perspective, one effect of globalization is that of
expanded markets. This basically means a company that has beforehand individual sold its
merchandise nationally can begin to sell their goods to additional countries. A good example of
the expanded markets consists of the auto industry. If Americans may perhaps borrow and spend
to sustain their living ethics, Washington policy creators could favorably disregard the statistics
that every year we are purchasing more from the rest of the world than we are actually selling;
which in turn is causing us to fall deeper in debt. Simply put, we as a country can rebalance our
trade with thoughtful investments and trade strategies that can possibly grow the market for the
United States manufactured products and goods. Otherwise we could just simply wait for the
global market to force us to contend in this world by dropping employees’ salaries and living
standards.
abstained from adopting trade policies, the world would have an economic condition called free
trade. This would mean there would be no more barriers to an exchange of goods or services
across national boundaries than there are within such boundaries (Britannica, 2014). In today’s
global economy, government industrial policies can dramatically change a nation’s comparative
advantages. If the determination of international trade is to supply goods and services that we all
demands, then I would have to assume that merely the purpose of government is to ensure that
nothing interferes with the transaction between international producers and consumers. However,
I do not agree with this information. My reasons are simply because some of the products we get
from other countries are not safe. My second point of thinking is, companies that trade with them
Globalization and Trade in Context 6
are often be able to hide details about how dangers or harmful their goods are from us; until the
government forces them to follow regulations. “According to a University of Michigan study, the
average U.S. family of four still stands to gain an estimated $7,800 per year if there was total
elimination of global barriers to trade in goods and services. The World Bank has reported that
the elimination of global trade barriers could lift 300-500 million of the world’s poor out of
poverty over the next 15 years (N,N, 2014). However, I know for a fact that I would like and do
General Motors stated they will be increasing its affiliation with China-based SAIC
Motor Corp. While it may be good for the American taxpayer, who do you really believed bailed
them out? Are there truly many jobs that the American workforce could be losing? Are there any
real benefits of the Trade Adjustment Assistance Program? I learned that the Trade Adjustment
Assistance program aids employees in getting back to work and on their feet by given the
required training to assist them in competing in today’s global economy. Broadly, free trade
agreements have not had a beneficial impact on US jobs. The year after NAFTA passed, the US
saw its trade deficit with Canada explode and their trade surpluses with Mexico turn into a trade
deficit. The NAFTA model provides a strong incentive for all producers to move out of the US
and export back home. International trade can raise efficiency is through the enhancement of
competition. By opening borders to trade, countries force industries to compete with goods and
services produced abroad; and hence to struggle to become competitive and pass on cost
reductions to consumers in the form of lower prices. In industries which tend to be monopolistic
Globalization and Trade in Context 7
or oligopolistic because of the nature of the production process, this is for the most part very
important. A great example would be the car and telecommunication industries. From the early
’90s onwards, a wave of multinational firms entered both markets. In both countries, these
entrants were required to achieve a high level of domestic content within a specified period
(typically, 70 percent within 3 years). For at least some of the new entrants, this was seen as an
unreasonable target, as domestic suppliers could not meet the price and quality requirements of
the car makers. Achieving the 70 percent target required the car makers to switch rapidly from a
reliance on imported components to sourcing from local vendors; and this in turn gave the car
makers a strong incentive to work closely with (first-tier) suppliers, to ensure that quality
standards were met, within an acceptable price. Trades could very well be a very good way to
bring competition and raise efficiency in these industries. Jobs continue to be lost to NAFTA
today. In the years 2007-2010, the U.S. economy has lost 116,400 as a result of the trade deficit
Reference Page
Works Cited
http://kids.britannica.com/comptons/article-202824/international-trade
Jeff Faux, A. O. (2014 ). Trade policy and the American worker. Retrieved from Trade and
Globalization: http://www.epi.org/publication/trade_policy_and_the_american_worker/
http://www.enotes.com/homework-help/it-404938
State, U. D. (N.D). Foreign Trade and Global Economic Policies. Retrieved from U.S.
Strachan, M. (2011). U.S. Economy Lost Nearly 700,000 Jobs Because Of NAFTA. Retrieved
trade-deficit-epi_n_859983.html