The document discusses the role of custom in Hindu law and its relationship to sacred law or smriti. It examines views from various ancient sources like Manu, Yajnavalkya, Brihaspati, and Narada that suggest custom should be considered or may even override sacred law in some cases. Modern sources like Mayne and Gautam state customs should not be opposed to public policy or sacred law. Case laws are cited that establish the importance of clear proof of custom outweighing written law. The document seems to explore whether custom overrides or supplements sacred law in Hindu legal tradition.
The document discusses the role of custom in Hindu law and its relationship to sacred law or smriti. It examines views from various ancient sources like Manu, Yajnavalkya, Brihaspati, and Narada that suggest custom should be considered or may even override sacred law in some cases. Modern sources like Mayne and Gautam state customs should not be opposed to public policy or sacred law. Case laws are cited that establish the importance of clear proof of custom outweighing written law. The document seems to explore whether custom overrides or supplements sacred law in Hindu legal tradition.
The document discusses the role of custom in Hindu law and its relationship to sacred law or smriti. It examines views from various ancient sources like Manu, Yajnavalkya, Brihaspati, and Narada that suggest custom should be considered or may even override sacred law in some cases. Modern sources like Mayne and Gautam state customs should not be opposed to public policy or sacred law. Case laws are cited that establish the importance of clear proof of custom outweighing written law. The document seems to explore whether custom overrides or supplements sacred law in Hindu legal tradition.
The document discusses the role of custom in Hindu law and its relationship to sacred law or smriti. It examines views from various ancient sources like Manu, Yajnavalkya, Brihaspati, and Narada that suggest custom should be considered or may even override sacred law in some cases. Modern sources like Mayne and Gautam state customs should not be opposed to public policy or sacred law. Case laws are cited that establish the importance of clear proof of custom outweighing written law. The document seems to explore whether custom overrides or supplements sacred law in Hindu legal tradition.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2
Ancient sources
Modern sources Application Marriage is a contract/samskara
Custom is Transcendental Law
- Beyond the experience, surpassing human experience Smritikars said the king in deciding a dispute should apply custom, decide in accordance with custom. Manu – It is the duty of the kind to decide dispute in accordance with sacred law but he should also make an enquiry into customs Yajnavalkya – One should not practice that which thou ordained by the smritis is condemned by the people. Brihaspati – The time-honoured institutions of each country, caste and family should be preserved intact. Narada – Custom decides everything and overrules the sacred law. There are 4 legs of law. Dharma (sacred law), Vyavhar, Charita ,Rajshasan Katyayna – Whatever a person practices, whether it is in accordance with dharma or not is declared to be tha charittra because e Apasthamba Sen Jamini – An established usage, not supported by any available text of smriti raises the presumption that there must have been some text of smriti as the basis of the usage which has now been lost or forgotten. This presumption is however rebutted whenever we find an express text of smriti condemning the conduct. Mayne – Custom should not be immoral or criminal or opposed to public policy Gautam – customs of countries, castes and families not opposed to sacred law are valid Brihaspati – Local tribal and family customs wherever they prevail from must be respected otherwise the subjects become agitated, popular disaffection springs up and the strength in the treasury of the government suffer in consequence Apasthamba – Local, tribal and family custom are authoritative when they are not opposed to sacred law Sen – Such customs or usages wherever they exist must be tolerated and recognised in the administration of justice but must not be recognised in Case – Collector of Madurai v Mootoo Ramalinga Sethupathy Privy Council 1868 - Aka – Ramnad case - Sir James Colville gave a statement “Clear proof of custom will outweigh the written text of law Kareva – Start living together … Chadarandazi – ceremonial aspect In both actual cohabitation should occur Bhartiben v Amitbhai Vithalbhai - Customary divorces Satyaprakash Meena v Alka Meena Duleshwar Deshmukh v Kirtitata Deshmukh S. 3A in answer after writing ingredients of valid custom…saving clause … S. 5(4), S. 5(6), S. 29(2) Under Hindu Law, customs have ‘propio vigore’
Q) Does custom override sacred law or is it supplementary to it?
- ANY QUESTIONS CUSTOM……BEGIN WITH THESE Ans writing - Basic - Smriti - Statutory - Caselaws