Final Revised LOI Report Corrected by E.E.dtd.16.2.2022 As Per DCPR 2034 Rohini

SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY
SRA/ENG/2937/GS/ML/LOI
Sub:- Proposed conversion LOI for Vital Public Project by amalgamation of

additional adjoining slum portion under reg. 33(10) of DCPR 2034 of plot
bearing C.S.no. 286(pt), 268(pt) & 2/269 of Lower Parel Division known
as Gawankar Nagar SRA CHS(Prop.) and contiguous slum at junction of
24.40 mts. wide Shivram Amrutwar Marg and 30.50 mts. wide
G.K.Kadam marg, with approved S.R.Scheme for slum colony known as
Nehru Nagar i.e. slum portion on plot bearing C.S.no. 286(pt) of Lower
Parel Division for 1) Ashtavinayak SRA CHS (Prop.), 2) Arvind Nagar 2
SRA CHS (Prop.), 3) Riddhi Siddhi Vyapari & Niwas SRA CHS (Prop.) & 4)
Arvind Nagar Worli SRA CHS (Prop.) and non-slum redevelopment area
under reg. 33(7) of DCPR 2034 read with notification dtd.8.7.2021 on
plot bearing C.S. no. 268(pt) & 286(pt) of Lower Parel division for Shree
Mangalmurti CHS Ltd. G/S ward Worli Mumbai- 400 013 .
Developer :- M/s. Always Remember Properties Pvt. Ltd.

New Architect :- Shri. Abhay Todankar of
M/s. Newtech Planners &
Consultancy Services Ltd. Ltd.
Old L.S. :- Shri. Anil Katdare of M/s. A.A.K. Associates
Societies :- Slum (Reg. 33(10) of DCPR 2034)
Old
1) Ashtavinayak SRA CHS (Prop.)
2) Arvind Nagar 2 SRA CHS (Prop.)
3) Riddhi Siddhi Vyapari & Niwas SRA CHS (Prop.)
4) Arvind Nagar Worli SRA CHS (Prop.)
New
5) Gawankar Nagar SRA CHS (Prop.)
Non Slum (Renewal Tenanted property – Reg.33 (7) of DCPR
2034 read with notification dtd. 8.7.2021)
6) Shree Mangalmurti CHS Ltd.
Plans :- C-1357 to C-1419.
Documentation: -
Society Annex. – I Draft Annex. – Annex. – III Draft
II forwarded by Slum Plan
Architect submitted
by
Architect
1)Ashtavinayak
SRA CHS Draft Ann-II
(Prop.), 2) forwarded by
Draft Slum
Arvind Nagar 2 Architect during
plan
SRA CHS acceptance of
alongwith
(Prop.), 3) scheme at pg. C-
Ann- II
Riddhi Siddhi 351 to
displayed on
Vyapari & C-367. Draft
Pg. C-1831 to C- Ann- II displayed site by the
Niwas SRA
1835 Pg. C- 1465 to Competent
CHS (Prop.) & on site by the
C-1466 Authority
4)Arvind Nagar Competent
forwarded
Worli SRA CHS Authority
by the
(Prop.) forwarded by the
Architect as
5)Gawankar Architect as at
at pg. C-111
Nagar SRA pg. C-1523 to
to C-113 &
CHS(Prop.) C-1631. Scrutiny
C-1661
6) Shree sheet at pg.C-
Mangalmurti 1815 to C-1817.
CHS Ltd.
Reference is requested to the representation of new Architect Shri Abhay

Todankar, M/s. Newtech Planners & Consultancy Services Ltd. vide pg. C-1325
to C- 1333, C-1347 to C-1355,C-1501 to C-1505 & C-1801 to C-1813 for
scrutiny and approval of conversion LOI for Vital Public Project by
amalgamation of slum portion under reg. 33(10) of DCPR 2034 on plot bearing
C.S.no. 286(pt), 268(pt) & 2/269 of Lower Parel Division known as Gawankar
Nagar SRA CHS(Prop.) and contiguous 24.40 mts. wide Shivram Amrutwar
Marg and 30.50 mts. wide G.K.Kadam Marg, i.e. balance slum pockets under
these roads not considered earlier with approved S.R.Scheme for slum colony
known as Nehru Nagar on slum portion on plot bearing C.S.no. 286(pt) of
Lower Parel Division for 1) Ashtavinayak SRA CHS (Prop.), 2) Arvind Nagar 2
Arvind Nagar Worli SRA CHS (Prop.) and for contiguous non-slum
redevelopment area under reg. 33(7) of DCPR 2034 read with notification
dtd.8.7.2021 on plot bearing C.S. no. 268(pt) & 286(pt) of Lower Parel division
for Shree Mangalmurti CHS Ltd. alongwith change of Architect and acceptance
of his supervision memo.
Brief History :-
In this case, the S.R.Scheme is accepted on 14/06/2017 as per S.R.A.
circular 144 & office order dtd. 30.4.2015 for the amalgamated S.R.Scheme of
slum portion on plot bearing C.S. no. 286(pt) of Lower Parel division, under
Reg.33(10) of DCR 1991 amended upto date for Ashtavinayak SRA CHS Prop.,
Arvind Nagar 2 SRA CHS Prop., Riddhi Siddhi Vyapari & Niwas SRA CHS Prop.
& Arvind Nagar Worli SRA CHS Prop. & contiguous non-slum redevelopment
area on plot bearing C.S. no. 268(pt) & 286(pt) of Lower Parel division under
reg. 33(7) of DCR 1991 amended upto date for Shree Mangalmurti CHS Ltd. at
the junction of Ganpatrao Kadam Marg & S.S. Amrutwar Marg Worli Mumbai-
400 013 to be implemented under clause 7.7 of Appendix – IV of Reg. 33(10) of
DCR 1991 amended upto date. The Draft Annexure – II submitted by the slum
societies is forwarded to the Competent Authority i.e. Assistant Commissioner,
G/S ward for preparation of certified Annexure – II, the same is awaited. The
LOI ÛÎú.ÃÖ.†Ö/´ÖÖ»Ö´Ö¢ÖÖ/480/¯ÖÏ.†.(ÃÖÝÖéÃÖ)/ ÃÖÖêÃÖÖ-2 dtd.
6.4.2018 for redevelopment u/reg.33(7) of DCR 1991 amended upto date of plot
bearing C.S.no. 268(pt) & 286(pt) of Lower Parel division of G.K. Marg, &
S.S.Amrutwar Marg G/S ward for Municipal tenanted property popularly
known as Shri Mangalmurti Co-Op HSG Ltd. is issued by Asst. Commissioner
(Estate) MCGM vide at pg. C-1467 to C-1488.
Thereafter, the LOI report was submitted to then CEO(SRA) for joint
development under reg. 33(10) for slum portion and under reg.33(7) for non-
slum portion pending certified Annexure – II under clause 3.12 D of Appendix
– IV of reg. 33(10) of DCR 1991.
Accordingly, the amalgamated LOI of S.R. Scheme for total 14549.20
sq.mts. i.e. of slum portion adm. 7082.99 sq.mts. for 316 tenements & 197
Extra PAP on plot bearing C.S. No.286 (pt) of Lower Parel Division under
Regulation 33 (10) of DCR 1991 amended upto date for Astavinayak SRA CHS
(Proposed), Arvind Nagar 2 SRA CHS (Prop.), Riddhi Siddhi Vyapai & Niwas
SRA CHS (Prop.) and Arvind Nagar Worli SRA CHS (Prop.) for 3.87 FSI and for
contiguous non-slum redevelopment area adm. 7466.21 sq.mts. for 101
renewal tenants on plot bearing C.S. no. 268(pt) & 286(pt) of Lower Parel
division under reg. 33(7) of DCR 1991 amended upto date for Shree
Mangalmurti CHS Ltd. for 3.00 FSI at the junction of Ganpatrao Kadam Marg
& S.S. Amrutwar Marg Worli Mumbai- 400 013 implemented under clause 7.7
of Appendix – IV of reg. 33(10) of DCR 1991 amended upto date as per
Government of India initiative of Ease of Doing Business and as per
notification dated 1.10.2016 is approved/issued vide LOI u/no.
SRA/Eng/2937/GS/ML/LOI dtd.05/07/2018 at pg. C-1293 to C-1310.
The IOA of renewal tenants building no.02 is issued u/no. SRA/ENG/
GS/MCGM/0089/20170614/AP/B2 dtd.05/07/2018 in IOA file. Thereafter
no further approvals are issued. On site there is no construction or site
preparation activity.
Now, the Asst. Commissioner G/S. ward MCGM vide his letter
dtd.21.7.2018 have directed to consider / amalgamate the encroached area of
two roads i.e. Ganpatroa Kadam Marg & S.S. Amrutwar Marg under slum, vital
link between Ganpatrao Kadam Marg & Pandhurang Budhakar Marg, catering
to Worli Naka & Veer Sawarkar Marg with the approved S.R.Scheme by
treating the same as Vital Public Project in the interest of MCGM & public at
large for the amalgamated slum portion adm.11024.70 sq.mts. (7082.99 +
3941.71) & non-slum portion adm. 7466.21 sq.mts. i.e. total 18490.91 sq.mts.
by the treating the non-participating & non consenting occupancy as
nominated PAP without insisting consent while certifying Annexure – II or
implementing the scheme u/reg. 33(10) to be clubbed / amalgamated to be
adjoining non-slum portion under DCR 33(7) of Nehru Nagar subject to
conditions mentioned therein.
The conditions to that effect are incorporated in the Draft Revised LOI.
The draft Ann- II displayed on site by the Competent Authority is

forwarded by the Architect as at pg. C-1523 to C-1631.
Further, reference is requested to the letter of Executive Engineer (Traffic
& Planning) City, MCGM received to this office u/no. Dy.Ch.E./4833/Traffic
dtd.22.9.2021 vide at pg. C-1773 to C-1789 along with accompanying plan
informing that Hon’ble MC’s approval to prescribe 12.00 mtr. wide R.L. portion
marked A- B on plan vide at page C-1775 for existing 6.00 mtr wide road
u/sec. 297(1)(a) of MMC Act 1888 has been already obtained. Accordingly, a
letter is issued by this office u/no. SRA/ENG/Desk/ 53759/GS dtd.8.10.2021
at pg. C-1771 to C-1789 to the developer / Architect to take the cognizance for
the same.
Thereafter, Architect has stated that developer has requested to the Dy.
Ch.Eng.(Improvement) MCGM vide letter dt.11.11.2021 as at pg.C-1795 to C-
1799 that subject to concessions as required to allow 12.00 mts. wide access
through north side of the subjected S.R. Scheme instead of through 12.00 mtr.
R.L. sanctioned by Hon’ble MC on existing 6.00 mtr road affecting east side of
S.R. scheme for implementing scheme on adjoining MCGM plot bearing C.S.
437 of u/reg. 33(20) (A) of DCPR-2034 of Lower Parel Division for overall
holistic development of the entire locality.
Further, Architect has stated that as informed by his clients the Hon’ble
MC has now approved
i) To make a new public street as per section 291(a) read with 294 of MMC
Act-1888 & thereafter for incepting new road line of 12.20 mtr width
for approximately 40.85 mtr length connecting SS Amrutvar Marg and
subject mentioned property.
ii) Incepting new Road line 12.20 mtr. width for length of approximately
40.85 mtr to for deriving the access to submit mentioned plot from S.S.
Amrutvar Marg, as per section 297(1)(a) of MMC Act 1888 after
obtaining sanction of Corporation as required under Law as per the
provision of section 291(a) read with 294 of MMC Act 1888.
As stated above, the Architect has proposed the new R.L. of 12.20 mts.
passing through the approved S.R. Scheme plot at north side as an access to
the adjoining Municipal Plot bearing C.S. no. 437 of Lower Parel Division for
construction of PAP tenements u/reg.33(20) (A) of DCPR 2034. Thus, Architect
has proposed the new R.L. of 12.20 mts. subject to MCGM recommendation &
co-operation to allow exceptional concession in planning as a consequence.
Further, he has stated that the developer vide his letter to Dy. Che. Eng.
(Improvement.) dtd. 11.11.2021 as at pg.C-1795 to C-1799 has requested for
various concessions, out of which the salient planning concessions required
are listed as under :-
1. To allow basement/ podium in mandatory open space and allow below
12.00 wide proposed access to plot bearing C.S. no.437.
‘a’
2. To waive off amenity plot requirement u/reg. 14 of DCPR 2034.
3. To allow building/basement touching D.P. road/ existing road.
Further, the Architect vide his letter at pg.C-1421 to C-1429 has stated
that the buildable plot for the subject S.R. Scheme is 56% due to road setback
etc. and due to proposing this additional area under 12.20 mtr road at north
side of the scheme the buildable plot has approximately now reduced to 56%,
thereby putting additional planning constraints on the already difficult plot.
Also, as stated earlier the Asst. Commissioner G/S ward MCGM vide his letter
dtd. 21.7.2018 have directed to treat the S.R. Scheme as Vital Public Project in
the interest of MCGM and Public at large. Thus, the Architect has requested to
allow the above mentioned concessions in the planning of the layout
considering the subject S.R. scheme as Vital Public Project.
In view of above, Hon’ble CEO(SRA)’s orders are requested to consider

the above mentioned concessions of para sideline ‘a’ for the S.R. Scheme
u/ref. since, only 56% of buildable plot is available for planning by treating
the S.R.Scheme as a Vital Public Project as directed vide MCGM letter dtd.
‘A’ 21.7.2018 as requested by the Architect subject to restricting the CC of the

portion of plot affected by 4.50 mtrs vide RL at East side of plot to existing
6.00 mtrs wide road until the clearance of structures falling in the
alignment of proposed 12.20 mtr wide access to the adjoining Municipal
Plot bearing C.S. no. 437 of Lower Parel Division at North side of plot.
Accordingly, the new Architect Shri. Abhay Todankar, M/s. Newtech

Planners & Consultancy Services Ltd. vide his letter as at pg. C-1357 to C-
1419 & C-1801 to C-1813 has submitted one set of plans for scrutiny &
approval of Revised LOI for above mentioned subject scheme with exceptional
concessions required due to additional constraints imposed as a result of
proposing 12.20 mts. wide R.L. at north side through the plot to make the
scheme viable since, the scheme is Vital Public Project along with change of
Architect and acceptance of his supervision memo.
It is here to mention that, various approvals/concessions and orders were
granted in past and LOI was issued for the subject S.R. Scheme. Copy of the
report approved by then CEO (SRA) is at pg. N-09 to N-171. Hence, the points
which were covered in earlier approvals are not repeated in this report and the
approvals for the same will be continued in accordance with the provisions of
DCPR 2034.
The report for revised LOI is as under: -
1. DRAFT ANNEXURE II/APPLICABILITY OF SRA CIRCULAR NO.177,

DCPR 2034 & SRA circular no.144.:
Reference is requested to para sidelined ‘A’ & ‘B’ in last LOI report
submitted to the then CEO(SRA) at pg. N-09 to N-171 and CEO(SRA)’s
approval / orders thereon at pg. N-169 to N-171.
1) To process and issue the LOI on the basis of Circular
No.SRA/ENG/4338/2017 dated 9.3.2017 read with SRA Circular No.177
dated 31.4.2017 and as per modified clause 3.12D of Appendix-IV of reg.
33(10) of DCR 1991 pending certified annexure –II as the draft annexure-
II for the subject scheme is forwarded to Competent Authority etc.
2) To allow the amalgamation of the adjoining slum plot on the plot bearing
C.S. No.268 (pt), 2/269 and 286 (pt) of Lower Parel Division majorly
coming under the alignment of road setback under the provisions of
clause 3.16 read with clause 7.7 of Appendix IV of DCR 33(10) accepted
as directed by then CEO(SRA) and subject to the condition that on
receipt of the certified Annexure – II for the plot issued by Competent
Authority the revised scheme parameters will be issued at Dy. Chief Eng.
(SRA) may please be seen.
Further, as per the Estate Dept. of MCGM’s LOI dtd. 6.4.2018, the
condition no.5 (28) of sub-clause ‘F’ copy as at pg. C-1467 to C-1488 for Nehru
Nagar plot to process the joint development of slum scheme on plot bearing
C.S. No.268 (pt) & 286(pt) of Lower Parel Division under reg. 33(10) with
adjoining redevelopment of plot bearing 268(pt) and 286(pt) for Shree
Mangalmurti CHS Ltd. under Reg. 33(7) as per UDD GOM notification dtd.
14.8.2013, under clause 7.7 of Appendix IV of Reg.33(10) of DCR 1991 subject
to compliance of condition mentioned therein.
In this case, the draft Annexure II of the subject scheme for 4 nos. of
slum societies i.e. 1) Ashtavinayak SRA CHS (Prop.), 2) Arvind Nagar 2 SRA
CHS (Prop.), 3) Riddhi Siddhi Vyapari & Niwas SRA CHS (Prop.) & 4) Arvind
Nagar Worli SRA CHS (Prop.) is forwarded to the Assistant Commissioner, G-
South Ward and the Competent Authority at Page C-855 to C-856 & the
certified copy for the same from Competent Authority is awaited.
Now, the Architect vide his submission letter at pg. C-1325 to C- 1333,
C-1347 to C-1355,C-1501 to C-1505 & C-1801 to C-1813 has proposed to
amalgamate the slum pocket on plot bearing C.S. No.286(pt), 268(pt) & 2/269
of Lower Parel Division known as Gawankar Nagar SRA CHS(Prop.) and
continuous 24.40 mts. wide S.S.Amrutwar marg and 30.50 mts. wide
G.K.Kadam Marg under reg.33(10)of DCPR 2034 by adjusting / changing the
slum boundary with the approved amalgamated slum colony known as Nehru
Nagar slum portion on plot bearing C.S. no. 286(pt) of Lower Parel division for
1) Ashtavinayak SRA CHS (Prop.), 2) Arvind Nagar 2 SRA CHS (Prop.), 3)
Riddhi Siddhi Vyapari & Niwas SRA CHS (Prop.) & 4) Arvind Nagar Worli SRA
CHS (Prop.) with conversion under reg. 33(10) of DCPR 2034 and contiguous
non-slum redevelopment of the Municipal Tenant Plot bearing C.S. no. 268 (pt)
and 286(pt) of Lower Parel Division under reg. 33(7) of DCPR 2034 read with
notification dtd.8.7.2021 for Shree Mangalmurthi CHS Ltd. of junction of G.K.
Kadam Marg S.S. Amrutwar Marg, G/S ward.
The amalgamation is proposed under the provisions of clause 3.15 and
7.1 of Reg.33(10) of DCPR 2034 as per the letter of Asst. Commissioner,
G/S /ward dtd.21/07/2018 at pg.C-1489 to C-1490.
Reference is requested to the letter marked to CEO(SRA) at pg. C-1489 to
C-1490 of Asst. Commissioner G/S ward dtd. 21/07/2018 stating that to clear
encroached area of these two roads (viz 30.50 mts. wide G.K. Kadam Marg, and
24.40 mts. wide S.S.Amrutwar Marg) thereby making available of a very vital
link between Ganpatrao Kadam Marg & Pandurang Budhakar Marg catering to
Worli Naka and Veer Sawarkar Road which is in the interest of MCGM and
Public at large. Further it is mentioned that the occupants on this plot shall be
considered as regular slum occupants for rehabilitation as per eligibility
criteria. The clearance shall be treated as Vital Public Project by treating the
non-participant eligible slum occupier in this combined scheme as nominated
PAP without insisting their consent while certifying Annexure – II so that the
implementation of said proposal will not be held up.
Further, as per the submission, the Architect has mentioned that the
scheme plot being affected by major setback of S.S. Amrutvar Marg and
Ganpatrao Kadam Marg and hence the amalgamation of the slum scheme with
the adjacent Municipal Tenant is proposed for better planning.
Further, as per the submission made by the Architect it is observed that
he has proposed the amalgamation of the adjoining slum encroached plot
which is affected by the road setback. The Architect by his representation has
mentioned that the amalgamation of the adjoining slum encroached plot is
proposed in view of the then CEO (SRA)’s endorsement given to correct the
slum boundary u/sec 3.16 while accepting the slum scheme. Further, it may
be seen that the adjoining slum plots are majorly affected by road setback and
the development or are non-developable & these plots will lead to scattered and
haphazard development. As such, inclusion of the adjoining slum encroached
plot would facilitate better building design & planned & holistic development
along with the subject scheme and also provide proper access & the
development of the entire road stretch connecting Pandurang Budhkar Marg to
Ganpatrao Kadam Marg which otherwise would have pockets of encroachment
in its alignment.
Further as per the NOC of Dy.Director Town Planning (SRA) vide u/no.
Ja.Kra. Zopupra/ Nar/Karya-1/Te-1 Vi.Yo.Abhipray/ Ashtvinayak Va Itar
4/Lower Parel/2017/14 dtd. 12/04/2017 at pg. C-619 to C-623 for acceptance
of the amalgamated S.R.Scheme, it is mentioned that on site inspection it is
observed that the 4 slum societies namely Ashtavinayak SRA CHS (Prop.),
Arvind Nagar-2 SRA CHS (Prop.), Riddhi Siddhi Vyapari & Niwas SRA CHS
(Prop.) & Arvind Nagar Worli SRA CHS (Prop.) are affecting existing S.S.
Amrutwar Marg. Further, area under Ashtavinayak SRA CHS (Prop.) is close to
existing Ganpatrao Kadam Marg. However, there are slum structures in
between Ashtavinayak SRA CHS (Prop.), & existing G.K.Marg which are not in
any S.R.Scheme. The same are not included in the S.R. Scheme u/ref.
Further, there are few slum structures in between Arvind Nagar Worli
SRA CHS (Prop.) the road abutting it & in front of Modern Textiles. Also, few of
the slum structures under the area of Arvind Nagar-2 SRA CHS (Prop.), Riddhi
Siddhi Vyapari & Niwas SRA CHS (Prop.) & Arvind Nagar Worli SRA CHS
(Prop.) are also not included in the scheme. Thus it is stated that inclusion of
these slum structures in to the S.R. Scheme u/ref. will enhance the over all
planning & holistic development of the area.
Further, as seen from the point no.5(28) of sub-clause ‘F’, condition to
be complied with before granting NOC of Estate Department of MCGM to issue
commencement certificates to rehab buildings & other buildings at Nehru
Nagar as at pg.C-1147 to C-1168 it is mentioned that the developer shall
accommodate the slum dwellers coming in the alignment of the two numbers of
the roads i.e. Ganpatrao Kadam Marg & S.S. Amrutwar Marg. on Nehru Nagar
plot [under 33(7)] by amalgamating these slum dwellers under reg. 33(10) after
issue of certified Annexure- II by Assistant Commissioner G/S ward.
As stated earlier the Architect proposed to amalgamate the slum pocket
by adjusting / changing slum boundary of plot bearing C.S. no. 286(pt),
268(pt) & 2/269 of Lower Parel division known as Gawankar Slum pocket and
contiguous 24.40 mts. wide S.S. Amrutwar Marg and 30.50 mts. wide
G.K.Kadam Marg under reg. 33(10) of DCPR 2034 with approved amalgamated
S.R.Scheme under DCR 1991 on slum pocket on plot bearing C.S.no. 286(pt) of
Lower Parel division for 1) Ashtavinayak SRA CHS (Prop.), 2) Arvind Nagar 2
Arvind Nagar Worli SRA CHS (Prop.) with conversion to reg. 33(10) of DCPR
2034.
The Architect has proposed the contiguous non-slum pocket
redevelopment of Municipal tenants on plot bearing C.S.no. 268(pt) & 286(pt)
of Lower Parel division under reg. 33(7) of DCPR 2034 read with notification
dtd. 8.7.2021 for Shree Mangalmurthi CHS Ltd. Also it is seen that the slum
area to non-slum area is more than 51% as required as per clause 7.1 of reg.
33(10) of DCPR 2034.
Further as stated earlier the draft Annexure – II of the 4 slum societies
included in the scheme viz. 1) Ashtavinayak SRA CHS (Prop.), 2) Arvind Nagar
2 SRA CHS (Prop.), 3) Riddhi Siddhi Vyapari & Niwas SRA CHS (Prop.) & 4)
Arvind Nagar Worli SRA CHS (Prop.) is forwarded to the Assistant Commission
G/S ward as at pg. C-351 to C-367 and the final certified Annexure – II for the
same is awaited. The draft Annexure – II for Gawankar Slum pocket and
contiguous 24.40 mts. wide S.S. Amrutwar Marg and 30.50 mts. wide
G.K.Kadam Marg proposed to be added to the approved scheme is submitted
by developer as at pg.C-1523 to C-1631 through Architect Shri Abhay
Todankar, M/s. Newtech Planners & Consultancy Services Ltd. Also,
Tahsildar–1 (Special Cell) (SRA) has forwarded the summary sheet for the draft
Annexure- II vide u/no. Kra.tahasi-1vik/Nehru nagar/21/63 dtd. 03/01/2022
as at pg.- C-1815 of the subject S.R. Scheme.
Further the proposal for amalgamation of these new slum pocket as per
MCGM letter dtd. 21/07/2018 is at pg.C-1489 to C-1490. However, the
proposal is not accepted by obtaining 06 nos. of NOC viz A.R.(SRA), Dy.Coll.
(SRA), F.C.(SRA), DSLR (SRA) & DDTP (SRA) as per this office circular no.144.
The Architect vide his letter at pg. C-1421 to C-1429 has requested to not to
insist the acceptance of scheme as per SRA circular no. 144 as per the letter of
Asst. Commissioner G/S. ward dtd. 27/07/2018 at pg.C-1489 to C-1490 so
that the proposal to clear the encroached area under these two roads can be
expedited considering it as a Vital Public Purpose Project.
Now, Architect has stated that slum dwellers are not giving their
consents for coming into the S R scheme under reference in the slum pockets
portion of area adm. 1082.51 sq.mt. as certified by Architect. Therefore,
Architect has proposed to amalgamate the area adm. 3941.71 sq.mt. of
Gawankar Nagar SRA CHS(Prop.) encroached area of two roads i.e. Ganpatrao
Kadam Marg & S.S. Amrutwar Marg under slum not including the slum pocket
area adm. 1082.51 sq.mt. as shown on plan certified & submitted by Architect
at page C-1357 & C-1655 with the slum plot area adm. 7082.99 sq.mtr. in
earlier approved LOI for 1) Ashtavinayak SRA CHS (Prop.), 2) Arvind Nagar 2
Arvind Nagar Worli SRA CHS (Prop.) and non slum portion area adm. 7466.21
sq.mt.as per clause 3.15 of reg. 33(10) of DCPR 2034, clause 7.1 of reg. 33(10)
of DCPR 2034, clause 3.12 (C) of DCPR 2034, clause 11.1 of reg.33(10) of
DCPR 2034 and reg. 9(6)(a) of DCPR 2034 shall be allowed.
Further, reference is requested to para sidelined ‘D’, Status of Slum at
pg.N-25 to N-26 of last LOI report submitted to then Hon’ble CEO(SRA) as at
pg. as at pg. N-09 to N-171 & then Hon’ble CEO(SRA) approval “To consider
the entire plot bearing C.S.no. 268(pt), 2/269 & 286(pt) at Lower Parel division
as slum area as a censuses slum colony including the adjoining encroached
plot to be amalgamated without consents on Municipal Records on the basis of
the remarks by Dy.Collector (City) SRA dtd. 8.5.2017 issued during accepting
the S.R.Scheme & letter a developer / L. Surveyor that photo pass have been
issued to the slum dwellers residing on the plot, subject to the condition that
no structure would be demolished till the certified Annexure – II is issued by
the Competent Authority for the said slum pocket”
Further, reference is requested to SRA circular no. 196 whereby the
declaration of land on which slum rehabilitation scheme is proposed or
submitted after 26.4.2018 as Slum Rehabilitation Area after 26.4.2018. The
LOI for the S.R. Scheme bearing C.S.No. 268(pt) & 286(pt) of Lower Parel
division is approved on 29/05/2017. However, as stated earlier the Architect
has proposed to amalgamate the slum under Gawankar Nagar SRA CHS (Prop.)
on plot bearing C.S. no 2/269 & 286(pt) of Lower Parel division adm.
approximately 3941.71 sq.mts. with the approved S.R. Scheme dtd.
29/05/2017 & as such the declaration of this part portion as Slum
Rehabilitation Area as per circular no. 196 is required.
The Architect has submitted the gazette notification
u/no.SRA/ED/OW/49314/3C(1)/GS/2021 dtd. 21.12.2021 at pg.-C1837 to
C-1838 declaring plot to be added now adm. 3941.71 sq.mts. bearing
C.S.no.268(pt), 2/269 & 286(pt) of Lower Parel Division as Slum Rehabilitation
Area u/sec. 3C (1) of MSA (IC & R) Act 1971.
In view of above, CEO(SRA)’s orders are requested
1. To process the proposal to amalgamate the encroached areas under

Gawankar Nagar SRA CHS(Prop.) affecting the above said two roads &
balance slum pockets under these roads not considered earlier is
submitted by the Architect as per the letter of Asst. Municipal
Commissioner G/S. ward MCGM dtd. 21/07/2018 under Cl. 3.15 of
33(10) of DCPR 2034 to clear the encroachment affecting the vital link
between Ganpatrao Kadam Marg and Pandurang Budhkar Marg by
treating non-participating & non-consenting occupants as Nominated
PAP’s treating this as Vital Public Project.
2. To process the proposal to amalgamate the encroached areas under
Gawankar Nagar SRA CHS (Prop.) affecting the above said two roads &
balance slum pockets under these roads not considered earlier is
‘B’ submitted by Architect Shri Abhay Todankar, M/s. Newtech Planners &
Consultancy Services Ltd. Ltd. as per the letter of Asst. Commissioner
MCGM dtd. 21/07/2018 without acceptance of the same as per SRA
circular no.144 to expedite the scheme at earliest to free the Vital link of
roads by treating non-participating & non-consenting occupants as
Nominated PAP’s treating this a Vital Public Project.
3. To allow to not include the slum pockets portion area adm.
1082.51sq.mt. as shown on plan certified & submitted by Architect
having the slum plot area adm. 11024.70 sq.mtr. in the proposed LOI for
1) Ashtavinayak SRA CHS (Prop.), 2) Arvind Nagar 2 SRA CHS (Prop.), 3)
Riddhi Siddhi Vyapari & Niwas SRA CHS (Prop.) & 4) Arvind Nagar Worli
SRA CHS (Prop.) & 5) Gawankar Nagar SRA CHS (Prop.) and non slum
portion area adm. 7466.21 sq.mt.as per clause 3.15 of reg. 33(10) of
DCPR 2034, clause 7.1 of reg. 33(10) of DCPR 2034, clause 3.12 (C) of
DCPR 2034, clause 11.1 of reg.33(10) of DCPR 2034 and reg. 9(6)(a) of
DCPR 2034.
4. To process the proposal to amalgamate the encroached area under
Gawankar Nagar SRA CHS (Prop.) affecting the above said two road viz
30.50 mts. wide G.K.Kadam Marg & 24.40 mts. wide S.S. Amrutwar Marg
known as & balance slum pockets under these roads not considered
earlier having area adm. 3941.71 sq.mts. as submitted by Architect as
per the letter of Asst. Municipal Commissioner G/S. MCGM dtd.
21.07.2018 by adjusting/ changing the slum boundary alongwith
conversion of already approved amalgamated S.R.Scheme of 4 nos. of
slum pocket 1) Ashtavinayak SRA CHS (Prop.), 2) Arvind Nagar 2 SRA
CHS (Prop.), 3) Riddhi Siddhi Vyapari & Niwas SRA CHS (Prop.) & 4)
Arvind Nagar Worli SRA CHS (Prop.) for enhanced carpet area of each
rehab unit adm. 27.88 sq.mts. (instead of approved 25.00 sq.mts. as per
DCR 1991) for 4.00 FSI / sanctioned FSI to all slum tenements for total
slum plot area adm. 11024.70 sq.mts. as per reg. 33(10) of DCPR 2034
adjoining contiguous non slum redevelopment of Renewal Tenants on plot
bearing CS no. 268 (pt.) and 286 (pt.) of lower Parel Division for plot area
adm 7466.21 Sq.mts. u/reg. 33(7) of DCPR 2034 read with notification
dtd.8.7.2021 for Shri Mangalmurthi CHS Ltd. at the junction of G. K.
Marg and S. S. Amrutwar marg G/S ward under clause 3.15 & 7.1 read
with clause 11.1 of reg. 33(10) and reg. 9(6)(a) & (b) of DCPR 2034.
2. Planning /permissibility /User of Sale Bldg. no.05:-

The Architect has proposed high rise sale bldg. no. 05 wing ‘A’ to ‘D’
having height 167.90 mtr. out of which wing ‘D’ is fully commercial wing
comprising of 03 level basements + Gr. to 1 st (Retail) + 2nd to 5th (business
offices) + 6th (business office & Refuge) + 7th (business office) + 8th amenity floor
+ 9th service floor + 10th to 47th upper floor service apartments having height is
167.90 mtr.
Wing ‘C’ comprising of 03 level basements + Gr. to 1 st (Retail) + 2nd to 5th

(business offices & part podium) + 6th (business office & part podium) + 7th
(business office & part podium) + 8th Amenity floor +9th service floor + 10th to
47th upper residential floors having height is 167.90 mtr.
Wing ‘A’ & ‘B’ comprises of 03 level basements + Gr. (Retail & Restaurant)
+ 1st (Restaurant part & podiums part) + 2nd to 6th (Service utility room part &
part podium) + 7th (part home occupation offices & part podium) + 8 th Amenity
floor + 9th service floor + 10th to 47th residential upper floors having height is
167.90 mtr.
Accessible through 24.40 mtr. wide S.S. Amrutwar Marg at west side and
30.50 mtr. wide G.K. Marg at south side i.e. more than 13.00 mtrs. as per reg.
19(2) (subject to NOC from CFO MCGM & HRC) instead of earlier High rise
residential sale building no.05 comprising of Three Wings (i.e. Wing ‘A’, ‘B’ & ‘C’
with two level basements + Ground(pt) / stilt(pt)+ four level podiums + 5 th to
57th (pt) upper floor having height 163.15 mtrs.
As seen from above, the Architect has proposed mixed users in high rise
sale bldg. no. 05 at wing ‘A’ to ‘D’ as under: -
2.1 Home Occupation Offices :-

The Architect has proposed Home Occupation rooms at 7 th upper floor of
wing ‘A’ & ‘B’ by counting its area in sale FSI as shown on plan at pg. C-1357 to
C-1419 as directed by his clients as stated by vide his letter at pg. C-1421 to C-
1429 accessible from min. 24.40 mts. wide D.P. & requested to allow the same.
As per sr.no.76 of reg.2 (IV) of DCPR 2034, Home Occupation Offices are
customary services provided to the general public other than of eating or a
drinking place, by a member of the family residing on the premises without
employing hired labour, and for which there is no display to indicate from the
exterior of the building that it is being utilized in whole or in part for any
purpose other than a residential or dwelling use, and in connection with which
no article or services is sold or exhibited for sale except that which is produced
therein, which shall be non-hazardous and not affecting the safety of the
inhabitants of the building and the neighborhood, and provided that no
mechanical equipment is used except that as is customarily used for purely
domestic or household purposes and /or employing licensable goods. If motive
power is used, that total electricity load should not exceed 0.75 KW. “Home
Occupation” may also include such similar occupations as may be specified by
the Commissioners and subject to such terms & conditions as may be
prescribed.
Thus, Architect has requested to allow the same subject to CFO NOC.
However, a Registered undertaking from the developer will be insisted before
plinth CC to the building u/ref. mentioning therein the terms and conditions as
stated above.
A condition to that effect is incorporated in the draft LOI.
2.2 Service Apartments: -

The Architect has proposed 12 nos. of service apartment per floor by
counting its area in sale FSI as shown on plan at pg. C-1357 to C-1419 as
directed by his clients as stated by vide his letter at pg. C-1421 to C-1429
accessible by 2 nos. of 2.00 mts. wide separate staircases & 4 nos. of lifts & 1
fire tower above the Gr. to 1st (Retail) + 2nd to 5th (business offices) + 6th
(business office & Refuge) + 7th (business office) + 8th amenity floor + 9th service
floor + 10th to 47th upper floor service apartments of wing ‘D’ & requested to
allow the same. There is no specific provision in DCPR-2034 for services
apartments. The Architect vide his letter at pg. C-1421 to C-1429 has stated
that the services apartments are apartments to be rented / leased on short
term / long term basis or to be sold with common amenities / services like
laundry, food, fully furnished with kitchen utensils, housekeeping etc. to the
occupiers / purchasers. The Architect has further stated that the services
apartments are at par with guest houses / Boarding & lodging houses. He has
requested to allow the same.
As per sr.no.4(V) table ‘C’ of sub reg. 3.2 of reg. 34 of DCPR 2034 guest
houses / circuit houses, Hostels & Boarding & lodging hoses, Dharamshala
are permissible at separate floor with separate access on minimum width of
street of 9.00 mts. However, there is no specific provision to allow services
apartment as per DCPR 2034.
Further, the Architect has vide his letter at pg. C-1421 to C-1429 has
stated that the entire wing ‘D’ building is purely commercial wing with mixed
user of ground + 1 retail user & 2 nd to 7th commercial business office + 8th
amenity floor (restaurant) / banquet hall etc. + 9 th service floor + 10th refuge
floor + from 11th to 47th upper floor for service apartment. Further, he has
stated that the users as per reg. 34 of DCPR 2034 are all commercial users &
are proposed together under one wing in order to have ease of planning &
running / maintaining day to day affairs of the building / wing. Thus, the
same are clubbed together. Further, he has stated that there are number of
buildings / wings of mixed users proposed in one wing / building in Mumbai
like Westin tower at Goregoan, 360 West building at S.R. Scheme of Sai
Sundar Nagar SRA Chs at Worli etc. Thus, he has requested to allow mixed
user in single building / wing with users permissible under reg.34 of DCPR
2034 accessible by 02 nos. of 2.00 mts. wide staircases & 5 lifts by treating the
same as fully commercial building.
In view of above, Hon’ble CEO(SRA)’s

1. Orders are requested to allow proposed Home Occupation Offices by
counting its area in sale FSI are customary services provided to the
general public other than of eating or a drinking place, by a member of
the family residing on the premises without employing hired labour, and
for which there is no display to indicate from the exterior of the building
that it is being utilized in whole or in part for any purpose other than a
‘C’ residential or dwelling use, and in connection with which no article or
services is sold or exhibited for sale except that which is produced
therein, which shall be non-hazardous and not affecting the safety of the
inhabitants of the building and the neighborhood, and provided that no
mechanical equipment is used except that as is customarily used for
purely domestic or household purposes and /or employing licensable
goods. If motive power is used, that total electricity load should not
exceed 0.75 KW. “Home Occupation” may also include such similar
occupations as may be specified by the Commissioners and subject to
such terms & conditions as may be prescribed at 7 th upper floor of wing
‘A’ & ‘B’ of sale bldg. no.5 ,accessible from 24.40 mts. wide S.S.Amrutwar
Marg at west side as per sr.no.26 table C of reg.2 (IV) of DCPR 2034
subject to CFO NOC and a Registered undertaking from the developer
before plinth CC to the building u/ref. mentioning therein the terms and
conditions as stated above as requested by the Architect.
2. Orders are requested to allow proposed service apartments by counting

its area in sale FSI i.e. apartments to be rented / leased on short term /
long term basis or to be sold with common amenities / services like
laundry, food, fully furnished with kitchen utensils, housekeeping etc. to
the occupiers / purchasers for which there is no specific provision in
DCPR 2034 at par with guest houses / Boarding & lodging houses
permissible as per sr.no.4(V) table ‘C’ of sub reg. 3.2 of reg. 34 of DCPR
2034 accessible by 2 nos. of 2.00 mts. wide separate staircases & 5 nos.
of lifts at wing ‘D’ having mixed users like retail, commercial business
office, amenity like restaurant / café etc. & service apartments by
treating the entire building as commercial building under clause 6.17 of
reg.33(10) of DCPR 2034 as requested by the Architect subject to NOC
from CFO MCGM.
3. Change of Architect/Acceptance of Supervision Memo :-

The new Architect Shri. Abhay Todankar has submitted his supervision
memo for acceptance as new Architect along with the resignation of earlier L.S.
Shri Anil Katdare of M/s. AAK. Associates and appointment letter of society
and developer as a new Architect of Shri Abhay Todankar for further
implementation of the scheme vide his letter at pg. C-1325 to C-1333, C-1347
to C-1355 & C-1501 to C-1505.
The New Architect has submitted the following documents for the
acceptance of his supervision memo as per circular no.157: -
1) Resignation of L.S. Shri Anil Katdare of M/s. AAK. Associates at pg. C-

1441.
2) Appointment of new Architect Shri Abhay Todankar of M/s. Newtech
Planners & Consultancy Services Ltd. Ltd. by the developer at pg. C-
1443.
3) New Architect Shri Abhay Todankar of M/s. Newtech Planners &
Consultancy Services Ltd. Ltd. acceptance letter of his appointment by
developer at pg.C-1445.
4) Appointment letter of new Architect Shri. Abhay Todankar of M/s.
Newtech Planners & Consultancy Services Ltd. Ltd. by the society as at
pg. C-1669.
5) New Architect Shri Abhay Todankar of M/s. Newtech Planners &
Consultancy Services Ltd. Ltd. acceptance letter of his appointment by
society at pg.C-1671.
6) License copy of new Architect at pg.C-1637.
7) 44/69 MR & TP Act form pg. C-1449 to C-1459.
8) Architects supervision Memo at pg. C-1447.
In view of above, Hon’ble CEO(SRA)’s approval is requested to accept

the supervision memo of the new Architect Shri. Abhay Todankar of M/s.
‘D’
Newtech Planners & Consultancy Services Ltd. Ltd. for further
implementation of the scheme under reference.
If Hon’ble CEO(SRA)’s approval/ orders to para side lined ‘A’ to ‘D’ above
are affirmative, then the further report in as under: -
4. Salient features of the proposal: -

Amalgamated S.R. Scheme of approved slum
pocket alongwith to be amalgamated adjoining
slum pocket known as Gawankar Nagar SRA
Sr.
CHS(Prop.) considered u/reg. 33(10) of DCPR 2034
No.
& non-slum pocket u/reg. 33(7) of DCPR 2034
read with notification dtd. 8.7.2021.
1. Local Name of the slum Nehru Nagar, Worli
1) Ashtavinayak SRA CHS (Prop.)
2) Arvind Nagar 2 SRA CHS (Prop.)
Name of Slum dwellers Society 3) Riddhi Siddhi Vyapari &
2.
(Reg.33(10)) Niwas SRA CHS (Prop.)
4) Arvind Nagar Worli SRA CHS (Prop.)
5) Gawankar Nagar SRA CHS (Prop.)
Name of renewal (tenement) society Shree Mangalmurti CHS Ltd.
3.
(Reg.33(7))
4. C.S. number 268(pt), 2/269 & 286 (pt) of Lower Parel Division.
5. Zone R-Zone & I-3 zone (As per SRDP 1991)
R-Zone (As per DDP 2034)
6. Reservation SRDP 1991 :- The plot is partly reserved for the
public purpose buildable D.P. reservation of
Housing for Dishoused (HD) & is affected by 24.40
mts. wide Shivram Amritwar Marg. & 30.50 mts.
Ganpatrao Kadam Marg.
D.P. 2034:- As per the D.P 2034 remarks dtd.

6.5.2019 and superimposed layout with DP-2034
submitted by Architect copy as at pg. C-1491 to C-
1497, the plot u/ref. is reserved partly for
rehabilitation & resettlement + homeless shelter &
is affected by 24.40 mts. wide Shivram Amritwar
Marg & 30.50 mts. Ganpatrao Kadam Marg.
7. D.P. remarks SRDP 1991 remarks: Issued u/no.
CHE/765896428/ DP/CITY /G/S dated
23.11.2016.
D.P. 2034 remarks: - Issued u/no.
CHE/DP34201905111220035 Dated 6.5.2019.
8. Annexure II The Certified Annexure – II by Competent
Authority is not issued. The same shall be
obtained before granting C.C. to the rehab bldg. in
the layout However, the LOI is processed for overall
upliftment & enhancement of the locality under
clause 3.12 (B) & (C) of Reg. 33(10) of DCPR 2034
as per the letter of Asst. Commissioner G/S ward
MCGM dtd. 21.07.2018 considering Vital Public
Purpose Project & Scrutiny sheet from Tahsildar–1
(Special Cell) (SRA) has forwarded the summary
sheet for the draft Annexure-II vide /no.
Kra.tahasi-1vik/Nehru nagar/21/63 dtd.
03/01/2022 as at pg.- C-1815 of the subject S.R.
Scheme.
9. Ownership and name of owner MCGM for C.S. no. 2/269 of Lower Parel Division
as per PRC at pg.C-1663 to C-1665. The MCGM
has issued letter dtd. 21.7.2018 for amalgamation
of the slums affecting the Vital link between
G.K.Marg & Pandurang Budhkar Marg falling on
C.S.no.2/269 & 286 (pt) of Lower Parel Division.
10. Minimum area of plot as per Affidavit/
Architect’s certificate/ Triangulation 18490.91 sq.mts. (11024.70 Slum + 7466.21 non-
method/ .DSLR (SRA). slum)
11. Density of existing tenements on net plot
Existing tenement density
449 x 10,000/ 3021.19 sq.mtr.
1486.17 Say 1486 t/s.
Number of PAP tenements generated in

12. NIL
the S.R. scheme.
5. Plot Area:-
The plot area details as per the various other documents submitted by
the Architect is as given below: -
Sr. Document Area in sq.mt. of Amalgamated S.R.Scheme Remarks

No. u/reg. 33(10) & 33(7) with adjoining slum
pocket considered u/reg. 33(10) to be
amalgamated
1 As per Architect 18490.91 sq.mts. (11024.70 sq.mts. Total plot area
plot area (slum) + 7466.21sq.mts. non-slum) considered for
certificate as at scheme 18490.91
pg.C-1463 to sq.mts.
C-1464.
2 As per 18490.91 sq.mts. (11024.70 sq.mts.
triangulation (slum) + 7466.21 sq.mts. non-slum)
calculation at pg.
C-1357
3 As per owners 18490.91 sq.mts. (11024.70 sq.mts.
affidavit for plot (slum) + 7466.21sq.mts. non-slum)
area as at pg. C-
1461
4 As per DSLR 18490.91 sq.mts. ( 7466.21 sq.mts-non-
(SRA) remarks as slum + 7082.99 sq.mts –slum ) and
at pg. C-379 to C- (3941.71 sq.mts- slum).
381 & C-1837 to
C-1839.
However, in this case, as per the letter of Asst. Commissioner

dtd.21.7.2018 the encroached area under the above said two road viz 30.50
mts. wide G.K.Kadam Marg & 24.40 mts. wide S.S. Amrutwar Marg known as
Gawankar Nagar SRA CHS(Prop.) area adm. 3941.71 sq.mts. by adjusting/
changing the slum boundary alongwith conversion of already approved
amalgamated S.R.Scheme of 4 nos. of slum pocket 1) Ashtavinayak SRA CHS
(Prop.), 2) Arvind Nagar 2 SRA CHS (Prop.), 3) Riddhi Siddhi Vyapari & Niwas
SRA CHS (Prop.) & 4) Arvind Nagar Worli SRA CHS (Prop.) area adm.7082.99
sq.mt.on plot bearing C.S. No.286 (pt), 268 (pt) and 2/269 of Lower Parel
Division under Reg. 33(10) and has requested to allow the same correcting the
scheme boundary under section 3.15 of reg. 33(10) of DCPR 2034.
This inclusion of adjoining slum structures in the S.R. Scheme will
enhance the building design and overall planning and holistic development of
the area and also provide proper access by removing all the slum structures
affecting the S.S. Amrutvar Marg and Ganpatrao Kadam which would
otherwise form scattered slum pockets in the alignment of D.P.roads and Thus,
establish a connection between Pandurang Budhkar Marg and Ganpatrao
Kadam Marg. The Architect vide his representation has requested to realign the
plot boundary by including the adjoining slum encroached plot.
Architect has stated that total plot area adm. 18490.91 sq.mts. (11024.70
sq.mts. + 7466.21) is considered for the scheme. The DSLR (SRA)remarks for
plot area adm.14549.21 sq.mts. (7466.22 non-slum + 7082.99 slum) is at pg. .
C-379 to C- 381 and slum plot area adm. 3941.71 sq.mts. is at pg. C-1837 to
C-1839.
Further, as per point no. 5-F (22) at pg.C-1467 to C-1487 of the LOI
dtd. 6.4.2018 for Shree Mangalmurti CHS u/reg. 33(7) of DCR 1991 as at pg.
C-1467 to C-1487 the amalgamation / sub-division layout shall be approved
before C.C. to the rehab building / any of the building in the scheme.
Also, the separate PRC in the name of MCGM for the C.S. no. u/ref. shall
be submitted before C.C. to last 25% sale component in the scheme.
The conditions to that effect are incorporated in the Draft Revised LOI.
In view of above, CEO(SRA)’s orders are requested to consider the total plot
area for S.R. Scheme adm. 18490.91 sq.mts. (7082.99 sq.mts. (slum) +3941.71
sq.mts. (slum) + 7466.21sq.mts. non-slum) on 24.40 mts. wide Shivram
Amrutwar Marg and 30.50 mts. wide G.K.Marg. under 33(10)) for the
amalgamated S.R.Scheme under clause 3.15 of reg. 33(10) of DCPR 2034 for 1)
Ashtavinayak SRA CHS Prop. 2) Arvind Nagar 2 SRA CHS Prop. 3) Riddhi Siddhi
Vyapari & Niwas SRA CHS Prop. 4) Arvind Nagar Worli SRA CHS Prop. And 5
‘E’
Gavankar Nagar SRA CHS under reg. 33(10) with Shree Mangalmurti CHS Ltd.
proposed u/reg. 33(7) of DCPR 2034 read with notification dtd. 8.7.2021, as
requested by Architect since it will result in better building design and planning
and holistic development of the area and also to clear access thus and to
establish a link between Pandurang Budhkar Marg and Ganpatrao Kadam Marg.
The in-situ development shall be restricted to 75% of the permissible BUA until
the plot area confirmation/Demarcation is obtained from the CTSO (City.)
6. Tenement Density :-
As per clause 3.12 (A) of Reg. 33(10) of DCPR 2034 the existing tenement
density for rehab component on slum plot under reference is calculated as
below.
Sr. Particulars Area in sq.mt. including
No. slum pocket considered u/reg.
33(10) to be amalgamated
1. Area of slum plot considered for S.R. Scheme 11024.70 sq.mts.
(59.62% of 18490.91)
2. Deduction for proposed road 7885.05 sq.mts.
3. i) Plot for buildable Reservation for Homeless 8.00 sq.mts.(32.01/4)
Shelter
110.46 sq.mts.
ii) AOS 14(A) (59.62% of 185.27)
4. Net plot area for calculation of tenements 3021.19 sq.mts.
Density
6. Number of tenements required to achieve tenement 196.38 say 196 t/s.
density of 650 T/net hectare
7. Number of existing tenements
Residential 296
R/C. 09
Others 15
Equivalent Commercial t/s. of 243 t/s (copy at page 3595.73/27.88
C-1369 to C-1401 ) =129
Total 449
8. Number of exiting tenements 563 t/s. (R-296, R/C-09 Comm-
as per Scrutiny sheet from Tahsildar–1 (Special Cell) 243 and others-15 )
(SRA) has forwarded the Tahsildar–1 (Special Cell)
(SRA) vide u/no/no. Kra.tahasi-1vik/Nehru
nagar/21/63 dtd. 03/01/2022 as at pg.- C-1815 of
the subject S.R. Scheme.
9 Existing tenement density 1486.17 say 1486
10. Number of PAPs generated in the S.R.Scheme NIL
As per clause 3.12 (C) of DCPR 2034, the Architect has proposed the
S.R.Scheme for the entire slum dwellers for 4 nos. of societies including the
adjoining slum pocket known as Gawankar Nagar SRA CHS (Prop.) & affected
by appurtenant road of S.S. Amrutwar Marg & G.K.Kadam Marg & requested
to allow the same by considering the tenements remaining after allotment to
eligible slum dwellers as PAP’s / affordable housing etc.
In view of above nil nos. of PAP’s are generated considering tenement

density of 650 t/s. per net hector as per provision of clause 3.12 (A) of reg.
33(10) of DCPR 2034 since the existing tenement density is high i.e. more than
650 t/s. per net hector.
7. ELIGIBILITY OF SLUM DWELLERS:

The Details of the provision made by Architect of Rehab component as
per the Scrutiny sheet from Tahsildar–1 (Special Cell) (SRA) vide u/no/no.
Kra.tahasi-1vik/Nehru nagar/21/63 dtd. 03/01/2022 as at pg.- C-1815 for
the draft Annexure-II of the subject S.R. Scheme is as under:-
Partic Amalgamated S.R.Scheme u/reg. 33(10)
ulars Rehab PAP’s Proposed Amenities Total
Resi Comm R/C Temple Ext. PAP Resi. Bal. Wel. Soci. Skill H.S. Yuva Comm. Sale
Amen. Extra/ Cent Off. Dev. Ken. hall conv.
Addl. PAP Center Shop
T/s. 296 243 09 05 10 -- 101 03 03 07 03 03 03 01 05 687
(Consid ( one
ered in C.H.at
sale three
FSI at locatio
this n)
stage)
Total 563 101 23 05 687
In view of the above, 563 nos. of slum dwellers (i.e. 296 nos. of Resi., 09
nos. of R/C, 243 nos. of Commercial t/s., 05 nos. Temple & 10 nos. other
amenities) are considered for amalgamated S.R. Scheme u/reg. 33(10) for free
alternate accommodation & additional incentive sale FSI permissible as per
reg. 33(10) of DCPR 2034 for sale in the open market to subsidize the rehab
component as per the Scrutiny sheet from Tahsildar–1 (Special Cell) (SRA) vide
u/no. /no. Kra.tahasi-1vik/Nehru nagar/21/63 dtd. 03/01/2022 as at pg.- C-
1815 for the draft Annexure-II of the subject S.R. Scheme as per clause 3.12
(C) of reg.33(10)of DCPR 2034.
As per clause 3.12 (C) of DCPR 2034, the existing tenement density
considering total nos. of slum dwellers listed in Annexure-II is 1486 t/s. per
net hectare as calculated above, which is more than 650 t/s. per net hectare.
The Architect has considered the scheme for grant of 4.00 FSI for entire 563
nos. of t/s. for amalgamated S.R.Scheme u/reg. 33(10) including adjoining
slum pocket known as Gawankar Nagar SRA CHS (Prop.) on adjoining
S.S.Amrutwar marg & G.K.Kadam Marg considered u/reg. 33(10) of DCPR
2034 pending the certified Annexure – II from competent Authority & in case of
tenements remaining after allotment to eligible slum dwellers this would be
converted into PAP’s/ affordable housing / rental housing / staff quarters etc.
at this stage & after finalization of appeal the balance t/s. shall be treated as
regular PAP t/s & requested to allow the same. As seen from the table at pg.C-
1357 the in-situ FSI consumed after provision of entire 563 nos. of t/s. is 3.29.
As per clause 3.8 of reg. 33(10) of DCPR 2034 for plots having access road of
13.00 mts. & above permissible in-situ FSI is 4.00 or upto sanctioned FSI of
the scheme whichever is higher.
As such as per clause 3.12(B) the balance FSI available in slum scheme
(4.00 – 3.29 = 0.71) after in-situ development additional rehab tenements may
be allowed upto & extent such that this development & corresponding sale
component development remains within the limit of maximum permissible FSI
in the scheme. Thus, the Architect has proposed the balance FSI available
after in-situ rehab & sale development as additional 101 PAP t/s. for
amalgamated S.R.Scheme u/reg. 33(10) to the extent such that this
development & corresponding sale component development remains within the
limit of maximum permissible 4.00 FSI in the said scheme & requested to
allow the same.
As per the letter of Asst. Commissioner, G/S ward, MCGM under
21.07.2018 point number ‘E’ “ Regular proposal to obtain Estate’s NOC as
envisaged in the policy guidelines issued on 10.9.2015 by Estate Department
under No. AC/Estate/14401/AE-(I)-(II) shall be forwarded to A.C.(Estates) once
the proposal is approved”
In view of above, CEO(SRA)’s orders are requested

1) To adopt 563 nos. of slum dwellers (i.e. 296 nos. of Resi., 09 nos. of R/C,
243 nos. of Commercial t/s., 05 nos. Temple (Considered in sale FSI at this
stage) & 10 nos. amenities) for plot bearing C.S. no. 268(pt), 2/269 and
286(pt) of lower parel division for the amalgamated SR Scheme u/reg. 33(10)
for 5 nos. of slum societies viz. 1) Ashtavinayak SRA CHS (Prop.), 2) Arvind
Nagar 2 SRA CHS (Prop.), 3) Riddhi Siddhi Vyapari & Niwas SRA CHS (Prop.)
& 4) Arvind Nagar Worli SRA CHS (Prop.) and 5) Gavankar Nagar SRA CHS
(Prop.) & balance slum pockets under these roads not considered earlier for
free alternate accommodation as per the Scrutiny sheet from Tahsildar–1
‘F’
(Special Cell) (SRA) vide u/no. /no. Kra.tahasi-1vik/Nehru nagar/21/63 dtd.
03/01/2022 for the draft Annexure-II in the said S.R.scheme under clause
3.12 (C) of Reg. 33(10) of DCPR 2034 by treating non-participating & non-
consenting occupants as Nominated PAP’s treating this a Vital Public Project
Subject to that the regular proposal to obtain Estate Dept. of MCGM NOC as
envisaged in the policy guidelines issued on 10.9.2015 by Estate Department
under No. AC/Estate/14401/AE-(I)-(II) shall be forwarded to A.C.(Estates)
once the proposal is approved, as per the letter of Asst. Commissioner, G/S
ward, MCGM under dtd. 27/07/2018.
2) To allow 101 Extra PAP t/s. for amalgamated S.R. Scheme u/reg. 33(10) &
adjoining slum pocket under clause 3.12 (B) of Reg. 33(10) of DCPR 2034 to
the extent such that this development & corresponding sale component
development is utilising FSI of 4.00 (i.e. within the limit of maximum
permissible FSI) and
3) To allow additional incentive sale FSI permissible against the Extra PAP t/s.
as per reg. 33(10) for sale in the open market to subsidize the rehab
component.
The condition to that effect is incorporated in the Draft Revised LOI.

8. Consent:-
As per the Scrutiny sheet from Tahsildar–1 (Special Cell) (SRA) vide
1815 for the draft Annexure-II of the subject S.R. scheme, there are total 563
nos.(Resi. 296, R/C 09, Comm. 243, Temple 05 & Amenities 10) of slum
dwellers at 5 nos of slum societies viz. 1) Ashtavinayak SRA CHS (Prop.), 2)
Arvind Nagar 2 SRA CHS (Prop.), 3) Riddhi Siddhi Vyapari & Niwas SRA CHS
(Prop.) & 4) Arvind Nagar Worli SRA CHS (Prop.) and 5) Gawankar Nagar SRA
CHS (Prop.) & balance slum pockets under these roads not considered earlier.
However, Architect has stated that in the last LOI dt.05.07.2018 report,
as per the draft annexure–II there are total 316 nos. of slum dwellers and the
L.S was submitted the common consent more than 70% without submitting
70% individual agreement of developer with slum dwellers and orders of then
CEO(SRA) was accorded for individual agreement shall be insisted before C.C.
to the rehab building vide para sidelined ‘G’.
Now, Architect has stated that he has considered total 563 nos. of slum
dwellers as per the Scrutiny sheet from Tahsildar–1 (Special Cell) (SRA) vide
1815 for the draft Annexure-II, the developer should submit 51% of individual
agreement with slum dwellers before C.C. to the rehab buildings as per the
standard policy adopted for 33(10) of DCPR-2034.
Further, as per the letter of Asst. Commissioner, G/S ward MCGM dtd.
21.07.2018 point D consider the clearance of encroachment affecting the Vital
Link between Ganpatrao Kadam Marg and Pandurang Budhkar Marg as Vital
Public Project and to treat the non participant eligible occupiers in this
combined scheme as nominated PAP’s without insisting their consents while
certifying Annexure II/ implementing scheme.
The Architect has not submitted the common consent for the now added
247 slum dwellers affected by adjoining Gawankar Nagar SRA CHS (Prop.) &
balance slum pockets under these roads not considered earlier. Further,
Architect has stated that his client i.e. the developer vide his letter at pg. C-
1431 to C-1439 has mentioned that they are in the process of obtaining the
consents and shall submit the required individual agreement for
accommodating these slum dwellers before granting CC to any Rehab building
and pending the consent of slum dwellers to approve the LOI/IOA for these
slum dwellers.
In view of above, CEO(SRA)’s orders are requested to issue LOI/IOA to the

amalgamated S.R.Scheme u/reg. 33(10) in absence of the common consent /
individual agreements by considering the clearance of the encroachment of the
slum dwellers affected by the Vital Link between Ganpatrao Kadam Marg and
‘G’ Pandurang Budhkar Marg as Vital Public Project and to treat the non-
participant & non-consenting eligible occupiers in this combined scheme as
Nominated PAP’s while certifying Annexure II/ implementing scheme as per the
letter of Asst. Commissioner, G/S ward MCGM dtd. 21/07/2018 subject to
submitting individual agreement as required before granting CC to any Rehab
building in the said scheme.
9. Permissible FSI for the development under DCR 33(7) :-

Reference is requested to point no. 8 para sidelined ‘H’ of the last LOI
report submitted to the CEO (SRA) at pg. N-9 to N-171 and CEO (SRA)
approval thereon to allow the development of renewal tenement property under
Reg. 33(7) of DCR 1991 and to process the incentive BUA by considering FSI 3
as per the provisions of clause 2 of Appendix -III of Reg. 33(7) of DCR 1991
Subject to undertaking from the developer for recovery of Capitalized Value of
surplus BUA as per the SDRR rates prevailing on the date of making payments
prior to issuance of various permissions like LOI, C.C. to sale building & OCC
to sale building.
The letter/remarks / Annexure – II issued by Assistant Commissioner
(Estate), MCGM, vide his letter No.AC/Estates/17807/ AO(Soc) of 16.12.2009
states that the structures on plot u/ref. are constructed prior to 1940. The
Assistant Assessor & Collector (G/S) vide his letter dtd. 15.3.2018 as at pg.C-
1083 to C-1125 have clarified that the repair cess is not levied for these
structures, however, the 1st date of assessment is 1.4.1994. Further the NOC
alongwith Annexure – II for re-development of said property has been issued to
the society under provisions of Reg. 33(7) of DCR 1991.
The LOI u/no.
ÛÎú.ÃÖ.†Ö/´ÖÖ»Ö´Ö¢ÖÖ/480/¯ÖÏ.†.(ÃÖÝÖéÃÖ)/ÃÖÖêÃÖÖ-2 dtd. 6.4.2018

for redevelopment u/reg. 33(7) of DCR 1991 amended upto date of plot bearing
C.S. 268(pt) & 286(pt) of Lower Parel Division off Ganpantrao Kadam Marg &
Shivram Amurtwar Marg G/S ward for Municipal tenanted property popularly
known as Nehru Nagar as at pg.C-1467 to C-1488.
Thus, as per point no.4 of LOI dtd.6.4.2018 as at pg. C-1467 to C-1488
it is mentioned that the FSI permissible shall be 3.00. Accordingly, the
following calculation is applicable for the subject scheme.
Area of the Plot is 7466.21 sq.mtrs.
FSI permissible – 3
Total Built Up Area permissible is 22398.63 sq.mtrs.
Further, as per MCGM circular u/no.AC/Estates/2165/AE(Imp)- II Dtd.
5.5.2012 point no. (P), Recovery of Capitalized Value, Capitalized Value of
surplus BUA shall be recovered as per the SDRR rates prevailing on the date of
making payments prior to issuance of various permissions like LOI, C.C. to
sale building & OCC to sale building. Accordingly, as per the LOI dtd. 6.4.2018
for Shree Mangalmurti CHS Ltd. at pg. C-1467 to C-1488 point no.4 table 3 &
point no.14(5) at pg. C-1467 to C-1488 & C-1481 respectively the Capitalized
value shall be paid by the developer and that the permissions for tenant & sale
buildings u/reg. 33(7) of DCR 1991 as tabulated under:-
Table No.3 point no.4
Sr. Recovery of capitalized Value Stages of recovery of capitalized
No. Value
1. Recovery of capitalized Value of Before issue of LOI
balance 5% area adm. 869.10 sq.mts.
(5% of 17381.91 sq.mts.)
2. Recovery of capitalized Value of Before issue of NOC for grant of C.C.
balance 15% area adm. 2607.29 to sale building in the scheme or
sq.mts. (15% of 17381.91 sq.mts.) before completion of project period
whichever is earlier
balance 30% area adm. 5214.57 for 50% of balance BUA of scheme or
balance 30% area adm. 5214.57 for entire balance BUA of scheme or
5. Recovery of capitalized Value of Before issue of NOC for grant of OCC
remaining balance 20% area adm. for sale building of scheme or before
3476.38 sq.mts. (20% of 17381.91 completion of project period
sq.mts.) whichever is earlier
The recovery of capitalized Value shall be made as per the SDRR rates prevailing for
the year of recovery of capitalized value payment.
For delayed payment beyond the stages as mentioned above the recovery of
capitalized value shall be made with recovery of 18% simple interest.
Table at point no.14 (The co-relation for C.C. of independent tenant

building to sale building under reg. 33(7) is as under) :-
Rehab building Sale building
Plinth C.C. Plinth C.C.
On completion of construction work upto 40% Further C.C. upto 20%
On completion of construction work upto 60% Further C.C. upto 40%
On completion of construction work upto 100% & after Full C.C.
obtaining OCC
The Architect has now submitted the proposal for scrutiny & approval of
revised LOI for amalgamation of slum portion on plot bearing C.S.no. 286(pt),
268(pt) & 2/269 of Lower Parel Division knowns as Gawankar Nagar SRA CHS
(Prop.) and contiguous 24.40 mts. wide Shivram Amrutwar Marg and 30.50
mts. wide G.K.marg i.e.balance slum pockets under these roads not considered
earlier, under reg. 33(10) of DCPR2034 with approved amalgamated
S.R.Scheme for slum colony known as Nehur Nagar on slum portion on plot
bearing C.S.no. 286(pt) of Lower Parel Division for 1) Ashtavinayak SRA CHS
(Prop.), 2) Arvind Nagar 2 SRA CHS (Prop.), 3) Riddhi Siddhi Vyapari & Niwas
SRA CHS (Prop.) & 4) Arvind Nagar Worli SRA CHS (Prop.) with conversion
under reg. 33(10) of DCPR-2034 and for contiguous non-slum redevelopment
area on plot bearing C.S. no. 268(pt) & 286(pt) of Lower Parel division under
reg. 33(7) of DCPR 2034 read with notification 8.7.2021 for Shree Mangalmurti
CHS Ltd. at the junction of Ganpatrao Kadam Marg & S.S. Amrutwar Marg
G/S ward Worli Mumbai- 400 013 as per the letter of Asst. Commissioner,
G/S ward, MCGM dtd. 21.07.2018.
The Architect has opted to convert the proposal on non-slum plot as per
modified clause no.10 of reg. 33(7) of DCPR 2034 vide copy at pg. C-1819 to C-
1820.
As per modified clause no.10 of reg. 33(7) of DCPR 2034 of UDD
notification u/no. TPB-4320/107/CR-72/2020(Part-I)/UD-11 dtd. 8.7.2021
“In case of redevelopments scheme in progress and such schemes where LOI
has been issued, the Owner/ Developer/Co-op. Housing Society with the prior
approval of Vice president and Chief Executive Officer, Maharashtra Housing &
Area Development Authority, may convert the proposal in accordance with
modified regulations. However, such conversion is optional and shall not be
binding.”
As per the letter of Asst. Commissioner, G/S ward, MCGM dtd.
21/07/2018 point number ‘A’ “All the conditions of LOI issued for Nehru
Nagar Scheme under No. AC/Estates/480/AO(Soc.)/Soc.2 dtd. 6.4.2018
including condition of payment of Rs. 188.25 crore as capitalized value
generated in the scheme will be applicable.”
In view of above, the development of renewal tenement property under
Reg. 33(7) and to process the incentive BUA by considering FSI 3 as per the
provisions of clause 2 of Appendix -III of Reg. 33(7) of DCR 1991 as sanctioned
vide last LOI dtd. 6.4.2018 shall be continued as per UDD letter u/no.
TPB/4319259/Pra. Kra.150/2019/Navi-11 Dtd.13/09/2019 vide copy at pg.
C-1817 to C-1818 subject to incorporating a condition in LOI as mentioned as
per point A of letter of Asst. Commissioner, G/S ward, MCGM dtd.
21/07/2018.
In view of above, CEO(SRA)’s approval is requested to the development of
renewal tenement property under modified clause no.10 of reg. 33(7) of DCPR
2034 as per UDD notification u/no. TPB-4320/107/CR-72/2020(Part-I)/UD-
‘H’ 11dtd. 8.7.2021 and to process the incentive BUA by considering FSI 3 as per
the provisions of clause 2 of Appendix -III of Reg. 33(7) of DCR 1991 as

sanctioned vide last LOI dtd. 6.4.2018 shall be continued as per UDD letter
u/no. TPB/4319259/Pra. Kra.150/2019/Navi-11 Dtd.13/09/2019 alongwith
earlier LOI issued dated 05.07.2018 with minor amendments.
10. Zone and Reservations :
Reference is requested to point no.9, zonal & reservation, para sidelined
‘I’ of the last LOI report submitted to the then CEO(SRA) as at pg. N-09 to N-
171 & CEO(SRA)’s has already given approval,
1) To not to insist the NOC from Naval Authority in the vicinity of 500 mts.
of vital defense installation at Worli since there are many building
constructed between the scheme plot and the Defense establishment
and as per the superimposed plan the scheme plot is more than 500
mtrs from the defense establishment.
2) To not to insist the MMRDA / MMRC NOC for Metro line-3 as the subject
scheme is more than 50 mtrs buffer from the centre line of metro as
seen from the superimposed plan submitted by Architect.
3) Not to insist the NOC from A.C. Estates MCGM for implementing the
S.R. Scheme falling under WORLI HILL ESTATE SCHEME NO.52 as the
LOI dtd. 6.4.2018 is issued for redevelopment scheme under Reg. 33(7)
of DCR 1991 the same shall be insisted for the balance plot u/reg.
33(10) by way of certified Annexure – II before granting IOA to sale
building.
4) To insist the NOC of SWD department of MCGM for drainage channel /

Nalla under road before C.C. to buildings abutting the nalla and directed
to “BUA 0f 44.64 sq.mt. against the reservation of R&R and 66.25 sq.mt.
for homeless shelter shall be required to be proposed in building plan”.
vide at page C-170.
(Conditions to that effect are incorporated in the draft revised LOI ) .
10.1 D.P. 1991:-

The Architect has submitted D.P. Remarks as per SRDP 1991 issued
u/no. CHE/765896428/DPCity/G/S dated 23.11.2016 as at pg. C-71 to C-75
& A.E. Survey remarks issued u/no AE/Survey/3488 dated 15.11.2016 as at
pg. C-81 to C-87. Architect has stated that as per D.P. Remarks and the
superimposed plan, the slum plot under reference falls in R-zone & for part
portion falls in I-3 Zone and is partly reserved for Public purpose of Housing
for Dishoused (HD) (small portion) & is affected by 24.40 mts. D.P. road &
Existing 30.40 mts.
Further, as stated in the D.P. remarks the plot under reference falls
under WORLI HILL ESTATE SCHEME NO.52 hence specific remarks should be
obtained from the concerned authority i.e. A.C.(Estate) before taking up any
development on the land. Also land u/r. is affected by Nalla, specific remarks
shall be obtained from the concerned authority.
Further, stated that MMRDA Authorities have conveyed that to insist the
NOC from MMRDA / MMRC for developments of land situated within the
stipulated distance of 50.00 mts. on either side of the centre line of the
tentative proposed alignment of the metro line – 3 (Colaba -Bandra) & with in
vicinity of vital defense installation at Worli.
Also, as per the D.P. remarks SRDP 1991 since the land the under T.P.
scheme remarks from Town Planning of MCGM should be obtained before any
development in the scheme.
10.2 Development plan 2034 :-
As per.D.P.2034 remarks u/no. CHE/DP34201905111220035 Dated
6.5.2019 as at pg. C- 1491 to C-1497 and plan superimposed with DP-2034,
Architect has stated that the plot falls in R-zone and is reserved partly for
rehabilitation & resettlement + Homeless shelter (R.R. 2.1 + R.S.A. 2.9) and is
affected by 24.40 mts. wide Shivram Amritwar Marg. & 30.50 mtr. Ganpatrao
Kadam Marg.
Further, the land u/ref. is affected by the influence zone of the proposed
Metro Rail alignment, Natural water course and also by Coastal Road. As such,
remarks from MMRDA , concerned authority and Chief Engineer ( Coastal
Road Dept.), MCGM shall be obtained respectively before commencing any
development. Also it is stated the land u/ref. abuts nalla hence specific
remarks E.E. SWD of MCGM shall be obtained before any development of the
land.
As per the recent Govt. Notification of Ministry of Defense the NOC for
the building construction within 500.00 mts. within vicinity of vital defense
installation is required. The Architect has stated that there are a number of
S.R. Scheme which have been already approved by S.R.A. and have been
implemented at an advance stage after issue of certified Annexure –II by the
Competent Authority i.e. MCGM by following due procedure in the vicinity of
vital defense installation.
The Architect vide his letter at pg. C-1421 to C-1429 has stated that the
S.R.Scheme u/ref. is on part portion of the larger C.S.no.286 of Lower Parel
Division. It is further stated that as seen from the superimposed plan & Google
plan at pg. C-1499 the Metro line – 3 & the vital defense installation at Worli
are abutting & affecting the plots in the vicinity of Dr. Annie Besant Road.
However the S.R.Scheme u/ref. is at a distance greater than 50.00 mts. of the
stipulated distances on either side of the centre line of the tentative proposed
alignment of the metro line – 3 (Colaba-Bandra) and also is at a distance
greater than 500 mts. of the buffer zone in the vicinity of vital defense
installation of Worli.
Further, the Architect has stated that a few of the S.R.Scheme already
implemented falling under Worli Hill Estate Scheme no.52 are given certified
Annexure – II by MCGM as Competent Authority by recovery of their dues an
accordingly the S.R.Scheme have been implemented further.
The Architect has been submitted the LOI dtd. 6.4.2018 for Nehru Nagar
plot bearing 268(pt) & 286(pt) of Lower Parel Division to be implemented u/reg.
33(7) of DCR 1991 by the Asst. Commissioner (Estate) MCGM as at pg.C-1467
to C-1488. He has further stated that as per Governments recent policy of
Ease Of Doing Business and so as to implement the scheme & clear the D.P.
road of encroachment & develop the same they request to insist the remarks
from A.C. (Estates) MCGM for balance portion of plot bearing C.S. 268(pt),
2/269 & 286(pt) to be implemented u/reg. 33(10) before granting C.C. to sale
building in scheme.
He has further stated that his clients are ready to pay the necessary
fee/charges/premiums etc. if any to MCGM & indemnify CEO (SRA) & his staff
against any litigation in the matter & submit undertaking to that effect.
Also, the Architect has stated that though the S.R.Scheme is under
T.P.S. Mahim no. IV as per the D.P. remarks there is no mention of the same
in the PRC of property bearing C.S. 286(pt) & 268(pt) of Lower Parel Division.
Thus, he has requested to insist the T.P. remarks for the property u/ref.
before C.C. to the sale buildings. Also, the land is affected by nalla & Coastal
Road. Further as per the letter of Dy. Director (Town Planning) (SRA) at pg.C-
619 to C-623 wherein stated that the S.R. Scheme u/ref. is affected by
drainage channel under road & no development / construction shall be
permissible for the same. As such in order to implement the scheme at earliest
L.S. has requested to insist the NOC for drainage channel / nalla before
granting C.C. to the rehab buildings.
Further, Architect has stated that the proposed coastal road is far away
from the proposed S.R. scheme thus requested to not to insist the NOC from
Chief Engineer (Coastal Roads Department) MCGM.
Architect vide his representation has mentioned that as per clause 17
(D) of DCPR 2034 for buildable reservation on lands where guidelines approved
by Government under section 31 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town
planning Act 1966 are not available. However, built-up area equal 20% of the
area under reservation in that plot shall be made available free of cost for the
Municipal Corporation or for any other appropriate Authority.
As such, as per the superimpose plan vide at pg.C-1499, the reservation
area as per SRDP 1991 by triangulation area calculation for Housing for
Dishoused is adm. 265.00 sq.mts. and as per D.P.2034 for Homeless shelter is
also area adm. 265.00 sq.mts. Further, Architect has stated that out of total
265.00 sq.mt. reservation area, 104.94 sq.mt falls in non-slum plot 33(7) and
160.06 sq.mt. falls in slum plot 33(10).
The calculation of reservations to be handed over to MCGM is as follows :

Slum plot 33(10) Non- slum plot
Description Remark
in Sq.mt. 33(7) in Sq.mt.
Plot area under
160.06 104.94 Total 265.00
reservation
Buildable reservation Total 101.80
160.06 X 20% =
as per Reg.17(3)D(4) of __ sq.mts. (32.01 +
32.01
DCPR-2034 69.79)
Constructed Built-
up amenity for
reservation under
__ 104.94 X 1.33 X
A.R. to be handed
50% = 69.79
over to MCGM /
Competent
Built-up amenity as
Authority
per Reg.17(3)(B)(2) read
Total 52.47
with Reg.17(1)(2)i(a)
sq.mts.
and Table-3 and Table
Reserved plot to
5, sr.no.44
be set aside for
104.94 X 50% =
built-up amenity
52.47
under A.R. to be
handed over to
MCGM alongwith
built-up amenity.
Accordingly, Architect has proposed the buildable reservation of area
adm. 101.80 sq.mt.(32.01+69.79) as against 101.80 sq.mt.as per Reg.17(3)D(4)
and Reg.17(3)(B)(2) read with Reg.17(1)(2)i(a) D.P. of DCPR-2034 vide plan at
page C-1491 to C-1497. subject to handing over the same to MCGM shall be
submitted before granting C.C. to the last 25% of sale BUA.
As per clause 7.1 of reg.33(10) of DCPR 2034 “The power under D.C.
Regulation 13(6) for shifting and / or interchanging the purpose of existing
amenity / reservation shall be exercised by the CEO (SRA)”.
However, architect has requested not to insist 50% of reserved plot area
adm 52.47 sq.mt.to be set aside for built-up amenity as per Reg.17(1)(2)i(a)
and Table-3 and Table 5, sr.no.44 due the planning constraints as the size of
the plot is odd and narrow to rehabilitate total 563 nos. of tenements of 27.88
sq. mtrs. carpet area each and the plot is majorly affected by road set-back of
24.40 mts. wide S.S. Amrutwar Marg. Also, Large nos. of slum dwellers of
rehab commercial have to be accommodated.
In view of above, Hon’ble CEO (SRA)’s orders are requested
1) To continue to not to insist the NOC from Naval Authority as requested for
development in the vicinity of 500 mts. of vital defense installation at Worli
as requested by Architect as he has mentioned that there are many
building constructed between the scheme plot and the Defense
establishment and as per the superimposed plan the scheme plot is more
than 500 mtrs from the defense establishment & subject to the condition
that Indemnity Bond indemnifying CEO (SRA) & his staff against any
litigation in the matter & submit undertaking to that effect before C.C. to
any bldg. in the layout of the scheme.
2) To continue to not to insist the MMRDA / MMRC NOC for Metro line-3 as
the subject scheme is more than 50 mtrs buffer from the centre line of
‘I’
metro as seen from the superimposed plan submitted by Architect.
3) To continue to not to insist the NOC from A.C. Estates MCGM for
implementing the S.R.Scheme falling under WORLI HILL ESTATE SCHEME
NO.52 as the LOI dtd. 6.4.2018 is issued for implementation of
redevelopment scheme under Reg. 33(7) of DCR 1991 for plot bearing C.S.
no.268(pt) & 286(pt) of Lower Parel Division by Asst. Commissioner
(Estate) MCGM, the same shall be insisted for the balance plot u/reg.
33(10) by way of certified Annexure – II before granting IOA to sale
building.
4) To insist the NOC of SWD department of MCGM for drainage channel /
Nalla under road before C.C. to buildings abutting the nalla as requested
by the developer and Architect so as to implement the scheme at earliest
pending Annexure – II as per Govt. policy for ease of doing business.
5) To accede the request of Architect to allow the buildable reservation of area
adm. 101.80 sq.mt. (32.01+69.79) as against 101.80 sq.mt. under clause
7.1 of Reg 33(10) read with as per Reg.17(3)D(4) and Reg.17(3)(B)(2) read
with Reg.17(1)(2)i(a) of DCPR-2034 subject to handing over the same to
MCGM shall be submitted before granting C.C. to the last 25% of sale
BUA.
and not to insist 50% of reserved plot area adm 52.47 sq.mt.to be set aside
for built-up amenity as per Reg.17(1)(2)i(a) and Table-3 and Table 5,
sr.no.44 read with cl.6.17 of reg.33(10) of DCPR 2034 due the planning
constraints as stated above.
6) To not to insist the NOC from Chief Engineer (Coastal Roads Department)
MCGM as the proposed coastal road is far away from the proposed S.R.
scheme as stated by Architect.
10.3 To allow the users on land permissible in Special Industries Zone
(I3) :-
Reference is requested to point no. 9.3, para sidelined ‘J’ of the last LOI
report submitted to the then CEO(SRA) as at pg. N-9 to N-171 & CEO(SRA)’s
approval thereon that,
1) To condone the deficiency in segregating distance by recovering premium
as per the premium charged for condoning deficiency in open spaces
maximum upto 83.33% for Rehab buildings no.4 as per the Clause 6.24
of Appendix IV of DCR 33(10) read with reg. 57(3)(c)(iii) of DCR 1991
amended upto date.
2) To allow the users permissible in R-1 Zone/R-2 Zone/C-1 Zone on part
portion of slum land area adm. 993.04 sq.mtr. affected by I-3 zone,
subject to obtaining the development permission from D.P. Dept before
approval of rehab building no.4 plans and to allow the users permissible
in Residential Zone (R – 1)/ C-1 Zone on the land situated in General
Industrial Zone (I-2) and by condoning the deficiency in segregating
distance as per provision of clause 6.24 read with clause 7.1 & 7.2 of
Appendix IV of DCR 33(10) amended upto date as requested by the L.S.
3) To not to insist public utilities & amenities in accordance with clause
57(3)(c)(i) & 10% additional recreational space in the layout as per reg.
57(3)(c)(ii) of DCR 1991amended upto date for various constraints as
stated by the L.S. under clause 6.24 of Appendix – IV of DCR 33(10)
amended upto date as at pg. N-45.
As per the superimposed plan with D.P. remarks as at pg. C-1499, that
the part portion of plot bearing C.S. no. 286(pt) of Lower Parel division,
admeasuring 993.04 sq.mt. for rehab building no.4 under small portion in
Special Industries Zone I-3 zone.
As per the D. P. Remarks, the plot partly falls in I-3 Zone therefore it is
required for conversion of Industrial zone to Residential zone or commercial
zone for the uses permissible in Residential or commercial zone as per
provision of Reg.14(B) of DCPR-2034,
However, Architect has stated that they have already accorded the
sanction of then CEO(SRA) to allow the users permissible in R-1 Zone/R-2
Zone/C-1 Zone on part portion of slum land area adm. 993.04 sq.mtr. affected
by I-3 zone, subject to obtaining the development permission from D.P. Dept
before approval of rehab building no.4 plans and to allow the users permissible
in Residential Zone (R – 1)/ C-1 Zone on the land situated in General
Industrial Zone (I-2) and by condoning the deficiency in segregating distance as
per provision of clause 6.24 read with clause 7.1 & 7.2 of Appendix IV of DCR
33(10) amended upto date as requested by the L.S. It is observed as per point ii
of para sidelined ‘J’ the same is allowed by oversight subject to obtaining
development permission from MCGM before C.C. to rehab building no.4.
Further as per reg. 17(3)(D) (b)(1) of DCPR 2034 slum in industrial zone
shall be allowed to be redeveloped in-situ without going through the process of
change of zone. In addition to residential uses, all the uses permitted for the
original zone shall be permitted. For industrial uses, the segregating distance
shall be maintained from the existing industrial unit. Accordingly, the
Architect is requested to allow the user permissible in R-1/ R-2/C-1 zone
without going through the process of change of zone.
Now, Architect has proposed the layout plan at pg. C-1357 showing
segregation distance from plot boundary which are tabulated below.
Rehab building no.4 (plan at pg. C-1357 & C-1403) :-

Side Segregating distances in Proposed Deficiency % deficiency Remarks
Mtr.
Required as per Reg.41 of
DCPR 2034 Table no.18(B)
C Sr. No. 3
North 6.00 More than -- -- Abuts to proposed layout
6.00 RG
South 6.00 1.50 4.50 75% Abuts existing 6.0 Mtr.
wide road
East 6.00 1.30 4.70 78.33% From plot boundary
West 6.00 0.00 6.00 100% Abuts 24.40 Mtr. Wide
DP road
The Architect has represented the hardship justifying the deficiency in

segregating distance which is of following nature.
i) The size of the plot is odd and narrow to rehabilitate total 562 nos. of
tenements of 27.88 sq. mtrs. carpet area each.
ii) The plot is majorly affected by set-back of 24.40 mts. wide S.S.
Amrutwar Marg.
iii) Large nos. of slum dwellers of rehab commercial have to be
accommodated.
However, the Architect has already been accorded the sanction of then
CEO(SRA) for condoning the deficiency in segregating distance by recovering
the premium charged for condoning deficiency in open spaces maximum upto
83.33% for Rehab buildings no.4 as per the Clause 6.24 of Appendix IV of DCR
33(10) read with reg. 57(3)(c)(iii) of DCR 1991 may please be seen vide pg. N-9
to N-171. Now, the architect has proposed the rehab bldg. no.4 at zero open
space at West side abutting the 24.40 mtrs wide S.S Amruthwar Marg due to
additional planning constraints due to provision of new road for MCGM plot
and thus requested to allow the same.
Further, as per Reg.14 (B)(c)(i) for plot areas under conversion of
industrial zone to residential /commercial zone less than 2000 sq.mts, 10%
amenity in the form of open land shall be handed over to MCGM free of cost. In
this case, the land area under slum encroachment in industrial zone is 993.04
sq.mts. The built-up amenity of homeless shelter admeasuring 101.80 sq.mts
is proposed to be handed over to MCGM in the SR scheme excluding areas
under DP road/set back area. Thus, Architect has stated that 10% amenities is
not proposed in the form of open land required as per Reg.14(B) (c)(i) read with
note b of reg. 14(B) of DCPR 2034.
In view of above, Hon’ble CEO(SRA)’s orders are requested,

1. To condone the deficiency in segregating distance by recovering premium as
per the premium charged for condoning deficiency in open spaces maximum
upto 100% for Rehab buildings no.4 as per Table no. 18(B) C Sr. No. 3 of
Reg.41 read with 6.17 of Reg. 33(10) of DCPR 2034.
2. To allow the users permissible in R-1 Zone/R-2 Zone/C-1 Zone on part
portion of slum land area adm. 993.04 sq.mtr. affected by I-3 zone, without
‘J’ going through the process of change of zone and to allow the users
permissible in Residential Zone (R – 1)/ C-1 Zone on the land situated in
General Industrial Zone (I-2) and by condoning the deficiency in segregating
distance as per provision of clause 6.17 read with reg. 17(3)(D) (b)(1) &
clause 7.1 of Reg. 33(10) of DCPR 2034 as requested by the Architect.
3. To not to insist public utilities & amenities in accordance with as per note b
of Reg.14(B) of DCPR 2034 as requested by the Architect.
11. Pathway / Internal Access Roads :-

Now, Architect has proposed the rehab commercial bldg. no.1 at sub-
plot ‘C’ is directly accessible through 24.40 mtr. wide S.S. Amrutwar Marg &
renewal (tenement) bldg. no.2 at sub-plot ‘B’ is accessible from 9.00 mtrs. wide
internal access/ pathway. The Rehab bldg. no.3 at sub-pot ‘D’ is directly
accessible through 24.40 mtr. wide S.S. Amrutwar Marg at West side and also
is accessible from 9.00 mtrs. wide internal access/ pathway at South side and
12.20 mtr wide proposed road for adjoining municipal property at North side.
The 9.00 mtrs. internal access/pathways are touching to the buildings. The
width of the access/pathway of rehab bldg. no.3 and renewal (tenement) bldg.
no.2 is maximum 9.00 mts., the Rehab commercial bldg. no.4 at sub plot ‘E’ is
directly accessible 24.40 mtr. wide S.S. Amrutwar Marg and Sale bldg. no.5 at
sub plot ‘A’ is directly accessible 24.40 mtr. wide S.S. Amrutwar Marg on west
side & 30.50 mtr. wide G.K. Marg on south side of the plot. Rehab sub plot
‘D1’ is directly accessible through 24.40 mtr. wide S.S. Amrutwar Marg on
west side. It is observed that the renewal tenant building no.2 & rehab
building no.3 is accessible from 9.00 mts. wide common internal access /
pathway through sub-plot ‘J’. It is observed that the basement of rehab
building no.3 is below sub-plot ‘J’. The Architect has requested to allow the
same as planning constraint. Also a condition shall be incorporated in the LOI
to vacate the structures in the alignment of the proposed 12.20 mts wide road
before granting CC to the building in the portion affected by 4.50 mts RL of
existing road at East side & hand over the same before granting CC to last 25
% sale BUA.
The area of sub plot ‘C’ for rehab commercial bldg. no.1 is 669.28
sq.mtrs., the area of sub plot ‘B’ for renewal (tenement) bldg. no.2 is 1627.64
sq.mtrs., the area of sub plot ‘D’ for Rehab bldg. no.3 is 2538.09 sq.mtrs., the
area of sub plot ‘E’ for rehab commercial bldg. no.4 is 752.77 sq.mtrs., the
area of sub plot ‘A’ for Sale bldg. no.5 is 3909.70 sq.mtrs. and the area of sub
plot ‘D1’ for Rehab buildings is 131.00 sq.mts. and sub-plot ‘J’ for common
access of sub-plot ‘B’ & ‘D’.
As per regulation 23(1) Table 7 of DCPR 2034, for plot area more than
4000 sq.mtrs. upto 10000 sq.mtrs. for less than length of 75 mtrs., the width
of the access required is 9.0 mtrs. for residential and commercial zones. Also
as per clause 6.12 of reg. 33(10) of DCPR 2034, the pathway shall act as an
access wherever necessary. The building shall be permitted to touch pathways.
Thus, the Architect has requested to allow 9.00 mtrs. wide

access/pathway touching to the building.
In view of above, the Hon’ble CEO (SRA)’s approval is requested to allow

9.00 mtrs. wide internal access through sub plot ‘J’ touching to rehab bldg.
‘K’
no. 1 & 3 and renewal bldg. no.2 having basement of rehab building no.3
below under the clause 6.12 of Reg. 33(10) read with Reg. 23(1) Table 7 of
DCPR 2034 as requested by the Architect for better planning and traffic
movement.
12. Amenity under Reg. 14(A) of DCPR 2034

The Amenities as per regulation 14(A) & 17(3)(D)(a)(9) of DCPR 2034 is
worked out for the scheme under reference as follows.
Sr. Description Plot Area
No. (In Sq.Mts.)
(1) Total Area of the Plot 18490.91
(2) Area of DP Road / set-back to be deducted 7885.05
(3) Balance Plot Area for computation of “Amenities” 10605.86
(4) Area of “Amenities” to be proposed as per Regulation 14(A)(i)&(ii) 560.59
(i.e. 5% up to 10,000 sq. m and 500, plus10% of plot area in (500 + 60.59)
excess of 10000 sqmt=1448.53sq.mt)
(5) Total DP Reservation under 33(10) and 33(7) to be handed over to 31.26
MCGM excluding DP Road & Set Back as per proposed layout (8.00 + 23.26)
(BUA of 32.01(HS)/4 = 8.00 sq.mt. and 69.79/3= 23.26 sq.mt.)
Total 8.00+23.26 =31.26 sq.mt.
(6) Balance AOS 529.33
(7) “Amenities” required to be proposed as per Note (ii) under 185.27
regulation 14 (i.e. 35% of (4) above) for Slum Plot
Thus, from the above table it can be seen that 185.27 sqmt. amenities
plot is required to be carved out plot. Architect has to carve out Amenities
plot adm. 185.27 Sq.mts. Architect has accordingly made provision of plot
adm. 185.27 Sq.mts as against area adm 185.27 sqmt for plot towards
amenities under Reg. 14(A) of DCPR 2034.
In view of above, Hon’ble CEO(SRA)’s approval is requested to allow

‘L’ the provision of plot adm. 185.27 sqmt as against area adm 185.27 sqmt for
plot towards amenities under Reg. 14(A) & 17(3)(D)(a)(9) of DCPR 2034.
13. Layout (amalgamation cum sub-division):-

Reference is requested to para sidelined ‘L’ point no. 12 of “Layout
amalgamation cum sub-division” as at pg. N-49, to allow the notional sub-
division of the S.R. Scheme plot into 23 sub-plots as tabulated earlier approval
LOI above as per Reg. 21 read with clauses 3.17 & 3.18 of Appendix – IV of
Reg. 33(10) of amended DCR 1991 by insisting the layout approval before
granting CC to the 2nd building in the layout, submitted to then CEO(SRA) at
pg. N-09 to N-171 and CEO(SRA)’s approval thereon at pg. N-171 may please
be seen.
Now, Architect has proposed the layout of the S.R. Scheme plot u/r. as
per Reg. 26 (1), and clause 3.16, clause 3.17 of reg.33(10) of DCPR 2034
consisting of 05 number of buildings i.e.
1. Rehab commercial bldg.no.1 comprising of Gr.+ 2nd (pt) upper floors
having height 13.35 mtr.,
2. High rise Renewal (tenement) bldg. no. 2 wing A & B comprising of 2
level basement + ground (pt)/stilt(pt)+ 1 st to 18th upper floors having
height 69.05 mtr.
3. High rise Rehab slum dweller bldg. no. 3 wing ‘A’ to ‘D’ comprising of 3
level basement + ground + 1st to 22nd upper floors having 75.03 mtr.
4. Rehab Commercial Building no.4 comprising of Basement(pt) +Gr. to 3 rd
(pt) having height 17.35 mtr. and
5. High rise sale bldg. no. 05 wing ‘A’ to ‘D’, out of which wing ‘D’ is fully
commercial wing comprising of three level basements + Ground & 1 st
Retail + 2nd to 7th business offices + 8th amenity floor (restaurant) /
banquet hall etc. + 9th service floor + 10th refuge floor + 11th to 47th upper
floor service apartments, wing ‘C’ comprising of three level basements +
Ground & 1st Retail + 2nd to 7th part business offices & part podiums + 8th
Amenity floor(restaurant) / banquet hall etc. + 9 th service floor + 10th
Refuge + 11th to 47th upper residential floors having height is 167.90 mtr.
and Wing ‘A’ & ‘B’ comprises of three level basements + Ground & 1 st
Retail + 2nd to 6th part business offices & part podiums + 7 th part home
occupation offices & part podium + 8 th Amenity floor (restaurant) /
banquet hall etc. + 9th service floor + 10th Refuge + 11th to 47th residential
upper floors having height is 167.90 mtr.
The table showing the details of subdivided plots, its area on plan at page
C-1357 to C-1419 and same is tabulated below: -
Sr. Amalg.S.R. Scheme Plot area Remark

No. 33(10) and 33(7) (sq. mtr.)
Sub-Plots
1 Sub plot -A 3909.70 Sale bldg. no.5
2 Sub plot –B 1627.64 Renewal (tenement) building no.2 (33/7)
3 Sub plot –C 669.28 Rehab Comm. Bldg. no.1
4 Sub plot –D 2538.09 Rehab Slum Dweller bldg no.3
5 Sub plot –E 752.77 Rehab Comm. Bldg. no.4
Sub plot –F 7885.05 Road Set-back for 24.40 mtr. wide S.S. Amrutwar
Marg and 30.50 mts. wide Ganpatrao Kadam
6
marg.
7 Sub plot –G 55.00 Access Road to adjoining Gomata Nagar SRA CHS
Sub plot –H Amenity Open space as per reg. 14(A) of DCPR
8 185.27
2034.
9 Sub plot -I 516.14 12.20 mtr R.L.
10 Sub plot-D1 131.00 Rehab plot
11 Sub plot –J 220.97 9.00 mtr.pathway
TOTAL 18490.91 ---
Architect has requested to allow the notional subdivision as proposed by
insisting the layout approval before granting CC to sale building in the scheme.
In view of above Hon’ble CEO (SRA)’s approval is requested to allow the

‘M’ notional subdivision as proposed into 11 sub plots as per clause 3.16, 3.17 of
reg.33(10) read with reg. 26(1) of DCPR 2034 by insisting the layout approval
before granting CC to sale building in the scheme as requested by Architect.
14. Layout RG (LOS):
In this case, the net plot area for slum plot excluding the area of
D.P.Reservation D.P Roads, works out to 3021.19 sq.mtrs. As such, the
scheme falls in the category of having net plot area from 2501 to 10,000 sqmt.
Therefore, 20% LOS is to be provided as per regulation 27 (1) of DCPR 2034.
However, Clause 6.11 of Reg. 33(10) of DCPR 2034 allows this LOS area to be
reduced to 8%.
The net plot area for non-slum plot excluding the area of D.P.Reservation
D.P Roads, works out to 7368.14 sq.mtrs. As such, the scheme falls in the
category of having net plot area from 2501 to 10,000 sqmt. Therefore, 20%
LOS is to be provided as per regulation 27 (1) of DCPR 2034. Provided further
the provision of LOS in case of the redevelopment scheme under the reg.33(7)
allows this LOS area to be reduced to 10%.
The same is tabulated below in the table as per clause no. 6.11 of regulation
33(10) of DCPR 2034.
Sr. Net Plot Require RG 8% Proposed Remarks

No area in for 33(10) and RG in Sqmt
sqmt. 10% for 33(7)
1 3021.19 241.70 Proposed at 5
(slum) different locations
2 7368.14 736.81 1074.25 with odd shapes &
(non- size.
slum)
Total 10389.33 978.51
Since scheme under reference is SRA scheme, the architect has proposed
physical RG of odd shapes and sizes at 5 different locations due to planning
constraints as per regulation 27(1) and clause no 6.11 of regulation 33(10) of
DCPR 2034. The total Physical/ Layout RG/Paved RG proposed in the layout is
1074.25 sq.mtrs against required 978.51 sq.mt. as seen from the above table.
As per reg. 27(2) note (2) minimum 60% of the required LOS shall be
provided exclusively on ground and atleast 50% of this shall be provided on
mother earth to facilitate the percolation of water & balance 40% may be
provided on podium area extending beyond building line. Thus, the Architect
has proposed 298.67 sq.mts. of R.G. at 2 locations i.e. R.G.3 & R.G. 4 of odd
shape & size on mother earth instead of required 293.56 sq.mts. ((978.51x
60%) x 50%). Thus, the balance R.G. adm. 775.58 sq.mts. (1074.25 – 298.67)
i.e. 69.84% is proposed at 3 locations i.e. R.G.1 & 2 at ground on Renewal
tenement bldg. no.2 & Rehab slum dwellers bldg. no.3 & R.G. 5 at 8 th floor of
sale bldg. no.5 i.e. amenity floor as paved R.G. free of FSI as shown on plan at
pg.C-1357 & requested to allow the same. Further, the width of R.G. 3 & 4 is
not less than minimum required 7.50 mts. as per reg. 27(1)(c) of DCPR 2034.
Also, the area of R.G.1 is not less than minimum required of 125.00 sq.mts. as
per reg. 27(1)(b) of DPCR 2034. All the R.G.’s 1 to 4 are accessible by
independent means of access.
The Architect has requested to allow the 5 nos. location of R.G. i.e. paved
R.G. no.1 to 2 & 5 and R.G. 3 & 4 of odd size & shape with minorly less size &
area accessible by independent means of access totally adm. 1074.25 sq.mts.
against required 978.51sq.mts. (8% for slum area & 10% non-slum area) due
to planning constraints as shown on plan at pg.C-1357 free of FSI & requested
to allow the same.
In view of above, Hon’ble CEO(SRA)’s approval is requested to allow R.G.
adm. 1074.25 sq.mts. against required 978.51 sq.mts. (8% for slum area &
‘N’ 10% non-slum area) out of which R.G. adm. 298.67 sq.mts. is proposed on
mother earth instead of required 293.56 sq.mts. (978.51 x 60%) x 50%) & the
balance as paved R.G. adm. 775.58 sq.mts. (1074.25 – 298.67) i.e. 72.20 %
free of FSI due to planning constraints at 5 nos. of R.G. i.e. paved R.G. no. 1 &
2 & R.G. 3 & 4 of odd size & shape with minorly less size & area accessible by
independent means of access and R.G. 5 at 8 th floor of sale bldg. no.5 free of
FSI as requested by the Architect.
15. Ratio of FSI:-

As per clause VIII (3.2) of reg. 33(10) of DCPR 2034, the incentive BUA
against rehab component proposed in S.R. Scheme depend on size of the
scheme & rate of the developed land & rate of construction as per ASR of year
in which LOI is sanction.
In this case, Architect has stated that the slum plot boundary of subject
S.R. scheme falls in three C.S. nos. i.e. 268 (pt), 2/269 & 286 (pt) and that the
SDRR Zone no. are different with different land rate for the said C.S. nos.
Further, the C.S. no 286 (pt.) falls in two different zone no. with different land
rate.
Thus, Architect has stated that the Avg. (weighted) land Rate is required
to be considered. The Architect has calculated the C.S. nos. wise slum area
vide copy at page C-1839. The details are shown as follows:
C.S. Land Area Land Rate as Land Value as per SDRR SDRR
No. in the per SDRR 2021- Zone
scheme in 22 (copy as at No.
Sq.mtr. pg. C-1841 to C-
1844 )
268 332.00 X Rs. 1,08,900/- = Rs.3,61,54,800/- 12/91
(pt)
2/269 635.45 X
Rs.1,29,420/- = Rs.8,22,39,939/- 12/91H
286 10057.25 X
Rs.1,19,160/- = Rs.119,84,21,910/- 12/91
(pt) (1,08,900 + &
1,29,420/2) 12/91H
Total 11024.70 -- -- -- Rs.131,68,16,649/- --
Average (weighted) land rate = land value/ -- Rs.1,19,442.40 --
Land area in scheme Say 1,19,442/-
Accordingly, the Incentive BUA factor is worked out as follows:

a. Total slum Plot area for the subject S.R.Scheme. 11024.70 Sq.Mts
b. Avg. (weighted) Land Rate (LR) as per ASR 2021–22 as Rs. 1,19,442/-
worked out above.
c. Construction Rate (RC) of 2021–22 Rs. 30,250/-
d. Ratio of LR to RC (LR/RC) 3.95
e. Incentive FSI Rehab : Sale 1:1.1
In view of above, Hon’ble CEO(SRA)’s approval is requested to allow to

consider the Avg. (weighted) land Rate for C.S. nos 268 (pt), 2/269 & 286 (pt)
‘O’ as mentioned above for the incentive BUA against rehab component proposed
in S.R. Scheme as per clause VIII (3.2) of reg. 33(10) of DCPR 2034 as
requested by Architect.
16. General Planning :-

In this case, Architect has proposed the layout of the S.R. Scheme
consisting of 5 number of building’s the details of the same is as under:
height 69.05 mtr.
3. High rise Rehab slum dweller bldg. no. 3 wing ‘A’ to ‘D’ comprising of
3 level basement + ground + 1st to 22nd upper floors having 75.03 mtr.
4. Rehab Commercial Building no.4 comprising of Basement(pt) +Gr. to
3rd (pt) having height 17.35 mtr. and
5. High rise sale bldg. no. 05 wing ‘A’ to ‘D’, out of which wing ‘D’ is fully
commercial wing comprising of three level basements + Ground & 1 st
Retail + 2nd to 7th business offices + 8th amenity floor (restaurant) /
banquet hall + 9th service floor + 10th refuge floor + 11th to 47th upper
floor service apartments, wing ‘C’ comprising of three level basements
+ Ground & 1st Retail + 2nd to 7th part business offices & part podiums
+ 8th Amenity floor + 9th service floor + 10th Refuge + 11th to 47th upper
residential floors having height is 167.90 mtr. and Wing ‘A’ & ‘B’
comprises of three level basements + Ground & 1 st Retail + 2nd to 6th
part business offices & part podiums + 7 th part home occupation
offices & part podium + 8th Amenity floor + 9th service floor + 10th
Refuge + 11th to 47th residential upper floors having height is 167.90
mtr.
 Planning of Rehab Bldg. no.1,3 &4:
17. Tenements Statement for Rehab component under reg. 33(10)

(Rehab no.1, 3 & 4) :-
The details of total tenements proposed in the Rehab slum dwellers
buildings is tabulated as below: -
Tenements statements Rehab Commercial Building No.1:-
floor Resi. Comm. R/C Temple Bal. Wel. Cen.Soci. Yuva Skill Dev.C.Hall PAP HL .
Office kendra Cent Shel. Total
Base. --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
1,2 & 3
Ground --- 13 --- 02 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 15
1st --- 12 --- 02 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 14
2nd --- 10 --- --- --- --- 01 --- --- --- --- --- 11
Total --- 35 --- 04 --- --- 01 --- --- --- --- --- 40
Tenements statements Rehab Commercial Building No. 4:-
floor Resi. Com. R/C Temple/ Bal. Wel. Soci. Yuva Skill CH PAP HL
Existing Cen. Office kendra Deve. Shel. Total
Amenity Center
Base. --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
1,2 & 3
Ground --- 17 --- 01(T)+ --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 19
01(O)=
02
1st --- 17 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 17
2nd --- 15 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 15
3rd --- 01 --- 06(EA) --- --- 01 --- --- --- --- --- 08
Total --- 50 --- 08 --- --- 01 --- --- --- --- --- 59
Tenements statement of Rehab Slum dwellers Building No. 3 :-

floor Resi. Comm. R/C Existing Bal. Wel. Soci. Yuva Skill C.Hall PAP HS Sale
Other Cen. Office kendra Deve. Con. Total
Amenity Center Shop
Base. --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
1,2 & 3
Ground --- 18 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 18
1st --- 44 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 44
2nd --- 45 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 45
3rd --- 36 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 36
4th --- 15 09 03 --- --- --- --- --- 01(pt.) --- --- 05 33
5th (ref) --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
6th --- --- --- --- 02 --- 05 --- --- --- --- --- --- 07
7th 14 --- --- --- 01 03 --- 03 03 01(pt.) --- --- --- 24
8th 16 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 12 --- --- 28
9th 16 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 12 --- --- 28
10th 16 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 12 --- --- 28
11th 16 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 12 --- --- 28
12th (ref) 12 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 09 --- --- 21
13th 12 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 09 --- --- 21
14th 16 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 12 --- --- 28
15th 16 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 12 --- --- 28
16th 20 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 08 --- --- 28
17th 25 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 03 --- --- 28
18th 28 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 28
19th (ref) 22 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 22
20th 22 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 01(pt.) --- --- --- 22
21st 28 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 28
22nd 17 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 03 --- 20
296 158 09 03 03 03 05 03 03 01 101 03 05 593
(at 3
locations
466
Summary of Rehab t/s statement (Rehab Buildings) :-

Sr. Bldg. Reh. Reh. R/C Ex. PAP Bal. Wel. Soc. Skill Yuva./ CH. H.S. Total Sale Tota
No. no. Resi comm. amm. (extra Dev. Library Con. l
Cen. Shop
1 Reh.1 --- 35 -- 04 (T) -- --- --- 01 -- -- -- -- 40 -- 40
2 Reh.3 296 158 09 03 101 03 03 05 03 03 01 03 588 05 593
3. Reh.4 -- 50 -- 01(T) + -- -- -- 01 -- -- -- -- 59 -- 59
1(O)
+6(EA)=
08
total 296 243 09 15 101 03 03 07 03 03 01 03 687 05 692
563
18. Basement for rehab comm. Bldg. no.1, 3 & 4
Reference is requested to para sidelined ‘S’ point no. 20 of “Basement for
renewal (tenement) bldg. no.2, rehab slum dwellers bldg. no. 3, rehab
commercial bldg.no.1 & 4 ” as at pg. N-9 to N-171 submitted to then CEO
(SRA) and CEO (SRA)’s approval thereon at pg. N-170 may please be seen to
allow:
1) 2 level basements with basement 1 with floor height ofv 3.00 mtr. and
basement 2 having 2 level car parking arrangement by provision of pit
parking having total max. height 5.50 mts. (inclusive of pit of depth 2.50
mts.) & 3.00 mts. for driveway for renewal (tenement) bldg. no.2 & has
provided 3 level basement for rehab bldg. no.3 with basement 1 with floor
height 4.20 mtr., basement 2 having height 2.90 mts. & basement 3 with
floor height 4.20 mtr for provision of 2 level stack parking & other building
utilities like U.G. tank. Pump room etc. along with the standard building
utilities as requested by SEAC and has provided single basement for rehab
bldg. no.1 & 4 with floor height 3.00 mtr. for other building utilities like
U.G. tank. Pump room etc. along with the standard building utilities as
required by S.E.A.C. for Environmental Clearance free of FSI. All the
basements for renewal (tenement) bldg. no.2 & rehab slum dwellers bldg.
no.3 are contiguous & is separated by single RCC wall in between them.
The Architect has proposed the basement within the building line having
minimum plinth height of 0.15 mts. & the basement beyond building line is
proposed flushed with the ground level for Rehab buildings no.3 and
Renewal building no.2 for vehicular movement with AA class RCC slab
2) Maximum open space deficiency of 100% for basement of rehab building
no.3 touching the compound wall at north side and on south side touching
the basement of renewal (tenement) bldg. no.2 and for rehab slum dweller
rehab / commercial building no.1 & 100% for the basement of Rehab
renewal (tenants) bldg.no.2 & rehab commercial building no.1 i.e. touching
to basement of rehab building no.3 at north side & sale building no.5 at
south side. Also to allow the open space of 3.00 mtr. abutting 24.40mtr.
road Shriram Amrutwar Marg & 6.00 mts. wide existing road at east side
for basement of rehab commercial bldg no.1 & 4 & renewal tenants
building no.2.
3) Minimum 0.15 mts. height plinth for rehab building no.1, 3 & 4 and
renewal tenants building no.2 instead of min 0.30 mts. and 0.60 mts. min.
required as per DCR 1991 due to planning constraints under cl.6.24 of
appendix-IV of DCR1991.
4) Maximum height of basement of 5.80 mts. for renewal (tenement) bldg.
no.2 & rehab slum dweller bldg. no. 3 & rehab commercial bldg. no.1 & 4
under cl.6.24 of appendix-IV read with reg.38(9)(ii) of DCR1991.
5) Access to basement through 6.00 mts. wide two-way ramp for rehab slum
dweller bldg. no.3 and renewal (tenement) bldg. no.2 touching to compound
wall at zero open space and through staircase only for rehab building
no.1&4
6) Basement of the renewal no. 2 and rehab bldg. no. 3 extended below the
9.00 mtr. wide internal pathway touching to the buildings.
In this case, Architect has proposed single level part basement having
max. height of 4.20 mts. partly within building line and partly beyond building
line below wing ‘B’ of Rehab commercial building. no.1 & wing ‘C’ of Rehab
commercial building no.4 accessible by a 1.50 mts. wide staircase and lift each
for pedestrian access only. The depth of basement from the average ground
level is 3.45 mts & 3.80 mts for rehab commercial building no. 1 & 4
respectively.
The Architect has proposed basement for Rehab Commercial Building no.
4 with zero open space at front side, 1.30 mts. at rear east side instead of 3.00
mts. required as per Reg. 37(7)(i) of DCPR 2034 and more than 1.50 mts. at
north side plot boundaries.
The Architect has proposed basement in Rehab Commercial Building no.
1 with minimum front open space of 1.00 mtr. and at zero open space from
other plot boundaries of Renewal Tenants Building no. 2 at East Side and
Rehab Building no. 3 at North side instead of 3.00 mts. required as per Reg.
37(7)(i) of DCPR 2034.
The Architect has proposed 3 level part basement having max. height of
13.30 mts. partly within building line and partly beyond building line of Rehab
slum dwellers building no.3 accessible by 4 nos. 2.00 mts. wide staircase and 3
lifts each for rehab residential component & 3 nos. of 1.50 mts. wide staircase
& 4 lifts for rehab commercial component for pedestrian access only. The
Architect has provided min. 6.00 mts. wide 2-way ramp for vehicular access to
the basement as reg.37(16) ii. The depth of basement from the average ground
level is 12.43 mts.
The Architect has requested to allow the same free of FSI for provision of
essential building services and utilities like U.G. tank, firefighting tank, pump
room, RWH, STP & OWC for Rehab Commercial Building no.1, 4 and Rehab
Slum dwellers Building no. 3 as per Reg. 37(7) (iv) (c) & 16(ii) of DCPR 2034 as
shown on plan at pg.C-1357 to C-1419 and requested to allow the same.
The Architect has requested the basement at Rehab Slum Dwellers
Building no. 3, Rehab Commercial Building no.1 & 4 free of FSI as per reg.37(7)
& 16 read with reg.31(1) (v) of DCPR-2034.
The details of the basement proposed is tabulated as under: -
Rehab comm. Rehab comm. Rehab Remarks

Description bldg. no.1 bldg. no.4 Slumdwellers
bldg. no.3
0.75 mts. above 0.55 mts. above Varying from As per clause 37(7)(v)
avg. G.L Avg. G.L. 0.60 mts. to 1.43 (a) of DCPR 2034
Plinth Height mts. above avg ceiling shall min. 0.60
G.L mts. to max. 1.35 mts.
4.20 mts 4.20 mtrs. Maximum total Not more than 3.90
height of 13.03
mtr. below soffit of
Proposed
mts (6.93 mtr. +
slab & min. 2.40 mts.
Height of
3.00 mtr. + 3.00
below beam as per
Basement
mtr. reg. 37(7) (ii) of DCPR
2034.
3.45 mtrs. 3.80 mtrs. Max 12.43 mtrs. Min. 3.00 mts. from
the front open space
boundary / edge of
road & min. 1.50 mts.
at other sides for
basement having
depth upto 8.40 mts.
Depth of
if depth exceed 8.40
basement
mts. than the open
spaces shall be
increased by 1.50 mts.
for every 8.40 mts. or
fraction thereof as per
reg. 37(7)(i) of DCPR
2034.
Access to Accessible by a Accessible by a Accessible by As per Reg. 37(7)(v)(d)
basement 1.50 mts. wide 1.50 mts. wide 1.50 mts. wide 3 & (e) of DCPR 2034.
staircase and lift staircase and lift nos. of staircases
each for each for & 4 nos. of lifts
pedestrian pedestrian access of commercial /
access only only shop wings &
2.00 mts. wide 4
nos. of staircases
and 08 nos. of
lifts of rehab
residential wing
for pedestrian
access and a min
6.00 mts. wide
two-way ramp
for vehicular
access.
Ventilation Ventilation Shaft/ Ventilation Shaft As per Reg.37(7)(iii) of
Shaft/ cutouts cutouts at top at top slab of DCPR 2034.
Light &
at top slab of slab of basement basement
ventilation
basement provided provided
provided
Fire tank, Fire tank, Car parking, Fire Reg. 37(7) (iv) (c):
Domestic flush Domestic / flush tank, Domestic parking Spaces, (b):
tank, pump tank, pump room, flush tank, building utilities and
User room, space for space for STP, pump room, services, & (e): suction
STP, OWC & OWC & service space for STP, tank, pump room, STP
service utility utility room. OWC & service of DCPR 2034.
room. utility rooms.
From the above table, it is observed that the height of the plinth of
basement for rehab slum dwellers building no.3 varies from 0.60 mts. to 1.43
mts. as shown on plan at pg.C-1357 to C-1419 instead of maximum permissible
1.20 mts. as per reg. 37(7)(v)(a) of DCPR 2034.
Further, the height of basement at rehab commercial building no.1 & 4 is
4.20 mts. & the height of basement rehab slum dwellers building no.3 varies
from 4.20 mts. to 6.93 mts. instead of permissible 3.90 mts. as per reg. 37(7)(ii)
of DCPR 2034.
The Architect vide his letter at pg.C-1421 to C-1429 has stated that the
height of the plinth & the basement of rehab slum dwellers building no.3
proposed more than permissible is due to planning constraints since the
topography of the plot u/ref. is slopping in the east west directions in between
S.S. Amrutwar Marg & 6.00 mts. wide existing road. The existing 6.00 mts.
wide road is approximately 1.78 mts. above S.S. Amrutwar Marg, as such to
maintained the 3rd basement slab at uniform level they have proposed basement
height of maximum 6.93 mts.
Further, the Architect has stated that the 6.93 mts. basement is also
used for 2 level stack parking arrangement & building services & utilities
requiring additional height of approximately 6.93 mts. as per the MEP
consultant. The Architect has stated that the additional basement height of
4.20 mts. for rehab commercial building no.1 & 4 is proposed for building
services & utilities requiring additional height of approximately 4.20 mts. as per
the MEP consultant. Thus, he has requested to allow additional basement &
plinth height for rehab commercial building no.1 & 4 & rehab slum dweller no.
3.
Further, it is observed that the Architect has proposed Rehab Slum
dwellers building no. 3 with 3 level basements having max. height of 13.03 mts.
(1st basement = 6.93 mts. + 2 nd & 3rd basement 3.00 mts. each) partly within
building line on front side and partly beyond building line. The maximum depth
of basement is 12.43 mts. The minimum front open space of 3.00 mts. abutting
S.S. Amrutwar Marg. The open space at north side plot boundary is 3.00 mts.
with basement proposed below the 12.20 mts. wide proposed road. The
basement is proposed at zero open space from plot boundary of Renewal
Tenants Building No. 2 at South side & 6.00 mts. wide existing road at East
side instead of 3.00 mts. required as per Reg. 37(7)(i) of DCPR 2034 as shown
on plan at pg. C-1357 to C-1419. The Architect has requested to allow the
basement has proposed along with open space free of FSI.
Also, the Architect has stated that he has proposed the basement of
Rehab Slum Dwellers Building no 3, rehab commercial building 1 & 4 with sub-
standard & zero open spaces due to planning constraints like accommodating
large nos. of parking spaces, building services / utilities like U.G. tank, fire
fighting tank etc. with greater depth, odd & narrow shape of plot, large number
of slum dwellers to be accommodated, major plot affected by road set-back,
access road to adjoining municipal plot, provision of amenity plot etc.as shown
on plan at pg. C-1357 to C-1419 and has requested to allow the same.
Further, the Architect has proposed the basement of rehab slum dwellers
building no.3 at north side below the 12.20 mts. wide proposed road access to
adjoining municipal property at a distance of 3.00 mts. from plot boundary as
shown on plan at pg.C-1357 to C-1419 & has requested to allow the same. The
Architect has stated that he has proposed the same due to planning constraints
as explained above subject to obtaining M & E NOC from MCGM for allowing
the basement as proposed before plinth C.C. to the same. He has further stated
they shall amend the plans if required before plinth C.C.
In view of above, Hon’ble CEO (SRA)’s
1. Order are requested to single level part basement having max. height of 4.20
mts. partly within building line and partly beyond building line below wing
‘B’ of Rehab commercial building. no.1 & wing ‘C’ of Rehab commercial
building no.4 having depth of basement from the average ground level is
3.45 mts & 3.80 mts for rehab commercial building no. 1 & 4 respectively
accessible by a 1.50 mts. wide staircase and lift each for pedestrian access
only & has proposed 3 level part basement having max. height of 13.30 mts.
partly within building line and partly beyond building line below wing ‘A’ to
‘D’ of Rehab slum dwellers building no.3 accessible by 4 nos. 2.00 mts. wide
staircase and 3 lifts each for rehab residential component & 3 nos. of 1.50
mts. wide staircase & 4 lifts for rehab commercial component for pedestrian
access only & provided min. 6.00 mts. wide 2 way ramp for vehicular access
to the basement with depth 12.43 mts. for provision of essential building
services and utilities like U.G. tank, firefighting tank, pump room, RWH, STP
& OWC for Rehab Commercial Building no.1, 4 and Rehab Slum dwellers
‘P’ Building no. 3 free of FSI under clause 6.17 of reg.33(10) read with 37(7) (ii),
37(7)(iv) (b)(c) & (e), reg.37(7)(v)(d) & (e) & 31(1) (v) of DCPR 2034.
2. Orders are requested to allow basement for Rehab Commercial Building no.
4 with zero open space at front side, 1.30 mts. at rear east side instead of
3.00 mts. required as per Reg. 37(7)(i) of DCPR 2034 and more than 1.50
mts. at north side plot boundaries, basement in Rehab Commercial Building
no. 1 with minimum front open space of 1.00 mtr. and at zero open space
from other plot boundaries of Renewal Tenants Building no. 2 at East Side
and Rehab Building no. 3 at North side instead of 3.00 mts. required as per
Reg. 37(7)(i) of DCPR 2034 & basement of Rehab Slum dwellers building no.
3 with 3 level basements having max. height of 13.03 mts. (1 st basement =
6.93 mts. + 2nd & 3rd basement 3.00 mts. each) partly within building line on
front side and partly beyond building line with maximum depth of basement
is 12.43 mts. & minimum front open space of 3.00 mts. abutting S.S.
Amrutwar Marg with open space at north side plot boundary is 3.00 mts.
with basement proposed below the 12.20 mts. wide proposed road & at zero
open space from plot boundary of Renewal Tenants Building no. 2 at South
side & 6.00 mts. wide existing road at East side instead of 3.00 mts.
required as per Reg. 37(7)(i) of DCPR 2034 under clause 6.17 of reg.33(10)
read with 37(7)(i) of DCPR 2034 due to planning constraints as explained
above as requested by the Architect subject to obtaining NOC from MCGM
for allowing the basement as proposed below 12.20 mts. wide road to
adjoining municipal plot before plinth C.C. to the basement in the alignment
of road & that they shall amend the plans as per the requirement of MCGM
if required before plinth C.C.
3. Orders are requested to allow the height of the plinth of basement for rehab
slum dwellers building no.3 varying from 0.60 mts. to 1.43 mts. instead of
maximum permissible 1.20 mts. as per reg. 37(7)(v)(a) of DCPR 2034 &
height of basement at rehab commercial building no.1 & 4 is 4.20 mts. & the
height of basement rehab slum dwellers building no.3 varying from 4.20
mts. to 6.93 mts. instead of permissible 3.90 mts. as per reg. 37(7)(ii) of
DCPR 2034 due to planning constraints since the topography of the plot
u/ref. is slopping in the east west directions in between S.S. Amrutwar Marg
& 6.00 mts. wide existing road of approximately 1.78 mts. to maintain the
3rd basement slab at uniform level due to planning constraints as explained
above free of FSI under clause 6.17 of reg.33(10) read with 37(7)(ii), 37(7)(v)
(a) & 31(1)(v) of DCPR 2034 as requested by the Architect.
19. Parking requirement Rehab commercial bldg. no.1, 4 & Rehab slum
dweller bldg. no.3) :-
The parking spaces required for the Rehab commercial bldg. no.1,4 &
Rehab Slum dwellers Building no.3 are tabulated as follows:
Rehab comm. bldg. no.1:-
Carpet area Number Parking required as Required Parking required
of Shops per Reg. 44 DCPR Parking/Flat
Table 21 under 33(10)
of DCPR -2034 Resi. Comm.
Carpet area is 35 1 parking for every 16.75 Nil 16.75
Rehab 670.18 sq.mts. 40.00 sq.mts. for floor
T/S (In rehab area upto 800.00
comm. bldg. sq.mts.
no.1)
Total 35 nos. -- 16.75 Nil 16.75 (a)
Hall (for 227.75 1 parking for every 15 15.18 15.18 (b)
temple) sq.mtr. sq.mtr.
10% parking for guest or min. 2 as per reg. 44 table 21. 3.19 (31.93 x 10%)
Say - 3 nos. (c)
Total (a + b + c) = 34.93 say
35 nos.
Total proposed parking 35 nos.
Rehab slum dweller bldg. no.3

Below 45.00 409 1 parking for 8 51.13 51.13
Sq.mt. (In tenements
rehab slum
dwellers bldg.
Rehab no.3)
T/S
Total 409 nos. -- 51.13 51.13 (a)
10% parking for guest as per reg. 44 table 21 read with notification u/no. 5.11 (b)
TPB-4321/CR-12/2021/UD-11 dtd. 21/12/2021
Total (a + b) = 56.24 say 56
nos. (c)
Carpet area is 166 shops 1 parking for every 800/40 = 20 40.10 nos. (d)
2478.67 (158 +3+5) 40.00 sq.mts. for 1678.67
(2408.14+ floor area upto (2478.67-
70.53) sq.mts. 800.00 sq.mts. & 1 800) / 80 =
(In rehab slum parking for every 20.98
dweller bldg. 80.00 sq.mts. beyond 40.98 nos.
no.3) (20 + 20.98)
10% parking for guest or min. 2 as per reg. 44 table 21. 4.10 nos. (40.10 x 10%)
(e)
Total (d+e) = 45.08 say 45 nos.
(f)
(c+f )= 101 nos.
Rehab comm. bldg. no.4:-

Carpet area Number of Parking required as Required Parking required
Shops/Ame per Reg. 44 DCPR Parking/Flat
nity Table 21 under
33(10) of DCPR - Resi. Comm.
2034
503.95 sq.mts. 57 1 parking for every 12.60 Nil 12.60
Rehab (376.24 + 40.00 sq.mts. for
T/S 127.71) (In floor area upto
rehab comm. 800.00 sq.mts.
bldg. no.4)
Total 57 nos. -- 12.60 Nil 12.60 (a)
Temple 14.82 1 parking for every 15 1.00 1.00 (b)
sq.mtr. sq.mtr.
10% parking for guest or min. 2 as per reg. 44 table 21. 1.36 (13.60 x 10%)
Min. 2 nos. (c)
Total (a + b + c) = 15.6 say 16
nos.
Total proposed parking 16 nos.
Total parking for building no 1, 3 & 4 152 nos.
(35 + 101 + 16)
From the above table it is seen that the Architect has proposed total 152
nos. car parkings spaces at basement level 1,2 & 3 in Rehab slum dweller bldg.
no.03 as against required 152 nos car parking spaces with scooter parkings for
the total rehab component under Reg.33(10) i.e. for Rehab Commercial building
no.1, Rehab Slum dwellers Building no.3 and Rehab Commercial Building no.4.
The Architect vide his letter as at pg. C-1421 to C-1429 has stated that
he has made provision of car parking spaces for the entire rehab component of
Rehab Commercial Building no.1, Rehab Slum dwellers Building no.3 and
Rehab Commercial Building no.4 as there are planning constraints due to odd
& narrow shape of plot, rehab commercial Shops provision at ground floor etc.
therefore, it is not possible to provide car parking arrangement separately
within each individual buildings and thus, he has made provision for the
parking of entire rehab component at basement level 1, 2 & 3 in Rehab Slum
dwellers Building no.3 by way of two level stack parking arrangement at 1 st
basement level and single level parking spaces at 2 nd basement & at 2 level
stack parking arrangement by way of pit & single parkings at 3 rd level basement
of Rehab Slum dwellers Building no.3 as free of FSI.
Also Architect has made scooter parking spaces as shown on plan as at

pg.C-1357 to C-1419 and has requested to allow the same. The parking are
provided as per Reg. 44 Table 21 & Reg. 31(1)(v) of DCPR 2034 and the
Architect has requested to allow the same free of FSI subject to submission of
NOC of E.E.(T&C) Dept. of MCGM before further CC to the building u/r.
In view of above, Hon’ble CEO(SRA)’s orders are requested to allow 152

car parking provisions for Rehab Commercial building no.1, Rehab Slum
dwellers Building no.3 and Rehab Commercial Building no.4 against required
152 as per Reg. 44 Table 21 & Reg. 31(1)(v) of DCPR 2034 at 1 st to 3rd level
basement at Rehab Slum dwellers Building no.3 by way of stack parking
arrangement and single parking space due to planning constraints like large
no of rehab shop to be proposed at ground floor, odd and narrow shape of plot,
road setback etc. instead of separately within each individual buildings under
clause 6.17 of Reg. 33(10) read with Reg. 44 Table 21 & Reg. 31(1)(v) DCPR -
‘Q’
2034 & treating the stack parking arrangement at par with electro mechanical
equipment subject to submission of NOC of E.E.(T&C) Dept. of MCGM before
further CC to the building u/r. & registered undertaking from the society of
slum dwellers of rehab slum dwellers building no.3 for permanently allowing
‘ parking for rehab commercial building no.1 & 4 at basement.
20. Rehab Commercial T/s :-

Reference is requested to para sidelined ‘Y’ point no. 27 of “Rehab
Commercial T/s ” as at pg.N-84 to allowing Rehab commercial shopping with
back to back shopping accessible from passage of 1.20 to 2.00 mts., more than
3.00 mts. wide pathways, 6.00 mts. wide existing road maintained by MCGM,
S.S. Amrutwar Marg, and proposed at ground 1 st, 2nd & 3rd(pt) floor of Rehab
residential / Commercial bldg. no.3, ground + 1 st to 2nd floor of Rehab
commercial bldg. no.1 and ground + 1 st to 3rd floor of Rehab commercial bldg.
no.4 as per draft Annexure – II forwarded by society of slum dwellers and
proposed by Architect for reasons of planning constrains as explained by L.S.
under clause 6.24 read with & Reg. 5.4 of Appendix – IV of DCR 33(10)
submitted to then CEO(SRA) at pg.N-9 to N-171 and approval thereon at pg. N-
171 may please be seen.
The Architect has proposed rehab commercial shops at ground, 1st to 4rd
upper floors at Rehab Slum dwellers Building no. 3, at ground, 1 st to 3rd upper
floors at Rehab Commercial Building no. 4 and at ground, 1 st to 2nd upper
floors at Rehab Commercial Building no. 1 as shown on plan as at pg. C-1357
to C-1419.
The Architect has proposed for total 243 nos. rehab commercial shops
i.e. 35 nos. of rehab shops proposed at Gr. + 1st + 2nd floor having floor to floor
height 4.20 mts. each in Rehab Commercial Building no.1 wing A & B. and 50
nos. of rehab shops proposed at Gr.+1st + 4th floor having floor to floor height
4.20 mts. each in Rehab Commercial Building no.4.
The commercial shops at Rehab Commercial Building no.1 wing A & B &
Rehab Commercial Building no.4 at ground floor are abutting 24.40 mts. wide
S.S. Amrutwar marg, the upper floor shops are accessible by 1.50 mts. passage
at zero open space abutting 24.40 mts. wide D.P.Road connected to 1.50 mts.
wide staircase and a lift deriving through 24.40 mts. wide S.S. Amrutwar marg.
The Architect has proposed 158 nos. of back to back rehab shops
proposed at Gr. to 4th floor in Rehab Slum dwellers Building no. 3 wing A to D.
The Architect has proposed floor to floor height at 1 st to 3rd floor of 4.20 mts.
each. However, the varying height from 3.95 mts. to 4.90 mts. is proposed at
ground floor, minorly more than the permissible height of 4.20 mts. as per Reg.
37(2)(ii) table 15 of DCPR 2034.
The back to back commercial shops at ground floor are abutting 24.40
mts. wide S.S. Amrutwar Marg and 6.00 mts. wide existing road. The back to
back commercial shops at 1st to 4th floor are accessible through 2.00 mts. &
1.50 mtr. wide passage at zero open space 24.40 mts. wide S.S. Amrutwar
marg connected to 4 staircases each of flight width 1.50 mts. and 6 lifts
deriving through 24.40 mts. wide S.S. Amrutwar marg and 6.00 mts. wide
existing road. The proportionate BUA of rehab commercial shops with existing
carpet area or upto carpet area adm. 20.90 sq.mts. is considered towards
rehab BUA/component & excess proportionate built up area beyond carpet
area 20.90 sq.mts. is counted towards sale FSI as per Scrutiny sheet from
Tahsildar–1 (Special Cell) (SRA) vide /no. Kra.tahasi-1vik/Nehru nagar/21/63
dtd. 03/01/2022 as at pg.- C-1815 and proposed by Architect due to planning
constraints as at pg. C–1421 to C-1429.
The depth of the shops is less than 12.00 mts. as per Reg. 34 (3.2) note 2
(a). The Architect has requested to allow the rehab commercial shop as
proposed for Rehab Commercial Building no.1 wing A & B, Rehab Commercial
Building no.4 and Rehab Slum dwellers Building no. 3 as per clause 5.3, 5.4 &
5.5 of Reg. 33(10) of DCPR 2034.
The Architect vide his letter at pg. C–1421 to C-1429 has stated that due
to odd & narrow shape of plot, large nos. of slum dwellers / tenants/ shops to
be accommodated, major plot being affected by road setback, essential building
services to be provided at ground floor open spaces, ramps and driveways for
parking etc. there are server planning constraints to proposed all the rehab
commercial shops falling in the alignment or D.P. road at ground floor of the
Rehab component.
Thus, after exhausting the entire ground floor of rehab component, to

accommodate the entire commercial component in the alignment of D.P. road
to be rehabilitated in-situ, they have proposed the rehab commercial shops at
1st floor and thereafter at upper floors maximum upto 4 th floor in Rehab
Buildings no.1,3 & 4. Further, the Architect has stated that they have
proposed the ground floor of varying height from 3.90 mts. to 4.90 mts.
minorly more than the permissible height of 4.20 mts. as per Reg. 37(2)(ii)
table 15 of DCPR 2034 due to planning constraints of sloping topography of
the plot from East side to West side with a level difference of 1.78 mts. to
ensure reasonable plinth height at ground. Thus the Architect has requested to
allow the ground floor of varying height from 0.60 mts. to 1.43 mts. for Rehab
Slum dwellers Building No. 3 and rehab shops proposed upto 4 th floor in
Rehab Slum dweller Building no.3.
Further, for allowing the planning / layout of rehab commercial shops as
per the standard policy adopted the NOC from the societies of slum dwellers is
insisted. However, the Developer / Architect vide their letter at pg. C-1421 to
C-1429 & C-1431 to C-1439 has stated that these shops under slum portion
are in the alignment of the proposed D.P.Roads & as such they have requested
not to insist the NOC from the societies of slum dwellers for implementation of
the scheme as per clause (D) of MCGM letter 21.7.2018 at pg.C-1489.
In view of above, Hon’ble CEO (SRA)’s

1) To order are requested for allowing Rehab commercial shopping proposed at
Gr. + 1st + 2nd floor in Rehab Commercial Building no.1 wing A & B and
proposed at Gr.+1st to 3rd floor in Rehab Commercial Building no.4 at
ground floor abutting 24.40 mts. wide S.S. Amrutwar Marg, the upper floor
shops are accessible by 1.50 mts. passage at zero open space abutting to
24.40 mts. S.S.Amrutwar Marg connected to 1.50 mts. wide staircase and a
lift deriving through 24.40 mts. wide S.S. Amrutwar Marg and proposed at
Gr.+1st to 4th floor in Rehab Slum dwellers Building no. 3 with back to back
commercial shops at 1st to 4th floor are accessible through 1.50 & 2.00 mts.
‘R’ wide passage zero open space abutting to 24.40 mts. S.S.Amrutwar Marg
connected to 4 staircases each of flight width 1.50 mts. and 6 lifts deriving
through 24.40 mts. wide S.S. Amrutwar Marg and 6.00 mts. wide existing
road for Rehab shops as per Scrutiny sheet from Tahsildar–1 (Special Cell)
(SRA) vide /no. Kra.tahasi-1vik/Nehru nagar/21/63 dtd. 03/01/2022 and
proposed by Architect due to planning constraints as explained by Architect
by not insisting the NOC for planning / layout of the commercial shop
‘ proposed as per clause (D) of MCGM letter dtd. 21.7.2018 under clause 6.17
read with clause 5.3, 5.4 & 5.5 of Reg. 33(10) of DCPR 2034.
2) To order are requested for allowing Rehab commercial shopping with greater
height upto 4.90 mts. more than the permissible height of 4.20 mts. as per
Reg. 37(2)(ii) table 15 of DCPR 2034 due to planning constraints of sloping
topography of the plot from East side to West side with a level difference of
1.78 mts. under clause 6.17 of Reg. 33(10) read with Reg. 37(2)(ii) table 15 of
DCPR 2034.
21. Sale convenience shops :-

In this case, the Architect has proposed total 05 nos. of sale convenience
shops at 4th floor in Rehab Slum dwellers Building no. 3 by counting its area in
sale FSI abutting 24.40 mts. wide D.P.Road known as S.S. Smrutvar Marg as
shown on plan as at pg. C-1357 to C-1419 as per clause 5.6 of reg.33(10) read
with reg.2(IV) (32) of DCPR 2034 & requested to allow the same.
Further, he has proposed carpet area of the convenience shops not more
than 30.00 sq.mts. maximum permissible as per reg. 2(IV) (32) of DCPR 2034.
In view of above, sale convenience shops having carpet area not more
than 30.00 sq.mtr. at 4th floor of Rehab Slum dwellers Building no. 3 abutting
24.40 mts. wide D.P.Road as per clause 5.6 of reg.33(10) read with reg.2(IV)
(32) of DCPR 2034.
22. Loft :-
The Architect has proposed loft atleast 2.00 mts. away from the entrance
of the rehab shops at Rehab Commercial Building no.1 & 4 & Rehab Slum
dwellers Building no.3 in shops having height not more than 1.50 mts. of sizes
as shown on plan as at pg. C-1357 to C-1419 free of FSI as per reg. 37(4) read
with 31(1) (viii) of DCPR 2034 & requested to allow the same.
23. Meter/panel room:-

Reference is requested to para sidelined ‘X’ point no. 26 of “Meter
Room/Fire Panel Room” as at pg.N-83 to allow meter/fire panel rooms of
various sizes & areas at ground / stilt floor as tabulated above by counting its
carpet/ BUA in rehab fungible compensatory FSI without charging premium of
rehab resi./commercial slum dweller building no.3, 1 & 4 and by counting its
carpet/ BUA in sale FSI for Renewal (tenement) bldg. no.2 as requested by the
L.S. subject to CFO NOC before grating further C.C. to the buildings u/ref.
submitted to then Hon’ble CEO(SRA) at pg.N-09 to N-171 and then Hon’ble
CEO(SRA)’s approval thereon at pg.N-170 may please be seen.
The Architect has proposed 2 nos. of meter room/panel each at ground

floor by counting its area in rehab fungible compensatory FSI in Rehab
Commercial Building no.1 & 4.
Further, he has proposed 4 Nos. of meter room/panel each at ground

floor at Rehab Slum dwellers Building no. 3 for Rehab Commercial Shops and
Rehab Residential units by counting its area in rehab fungible compensatory
FSI as shown in the plan as at pg. C-1357 to C-1419. The height of the electric
meter / panel rooms at ground floor for Rehab Buildings is maximum height
4.90 mts. minorly more than 4.20 mts. due to planning constraints of sloping
topography of the plot from East side to West side with a level difference of
1.78 mts. The Architect has proposed the electric meter room at ground floor
by counting its area in rehab fungible compensatory FSI as per Reg. 31(1)
(xxxii) read with Reg. 31(3) of DCPR 2034 and requested to allow the same.
The details of rehab Meter/Panel rooms is as under:
Sr. Bldg. No. Size Area in Location Remarks
No. sq.mtr.
1. Rehab 5.40 x 1.64 x 2 17.71 Gr. Floor
Commercial
Building no.1
2. Rehab Slum 3.56 x 1.55 5.52 Gr.Floor
dwellers 2.36 x 5.25 12.39 (Wing ‘A’)
Building No. 3 Residential
dwellers 2.67 x 3.25 8.68 (Wing ‘A’)
Building No. 3 Commercial
3. Rehab Slum 4.10 X 4.45 18.25 Gr.Floor
dwellers (Wing ‘B’)
4. Rehab Slum 1.55 x 1.20 1.86 Gr.Floor The same is counted
dwellers 2.55 x 3.25 8.29 (Wing ‘B’) in rehab fungible
Building No. 3 Commercial compensatory FSI
dwellers 1.50 x 5.25 7.88 (Wing ‘C’)
dwellers 2.67 x 3.25 8.29 (Wing ‘C’)
dwellers 2.36 x 5.25 12.39 (Wing ‘D’)
dwellers 2.55 x 3.25 8.68 (Wing ‘D’)
9. Rehab 2.00 x 3.00 6.00 Gr. Floor
Commercial The same is counted
Building no.4 in rehab fungible
10. Rehab 2.67 x 3.00 8.10 Gr. Floor compensatory FSI
Commercial
Building no.4
Further, there is no specific provision of panel rooms in the DCPR 2034.
The panel rooms are proposed as per the standard requirement of CFO
MCGM indicator panel of fire emergency in the electric room and has thus
requested to allow the same subject to NOC from concern electric supply
company shall be obtained before FCC of bldg. under ref.
In view of above, Hon’ble CEO (SRA)’s Order are requested to allow the
proposed electric meter room at ground floor at Rehab Commercial Building
no. 1 & 4 & has proposed meter room/panel at ground floor of Rehab Slum
dwellers Building no.3 with additional height of the electric meter / panel
‘S’ rooms having maximum upto 4.90 mts. minorly more than 4.20 mts. due to
planning constraints of sloping topography of the plot from East side to West
side with a level difference of 1.78 mts. by counting it’s area in rehab fungible
compensatory FSI as tabulated above under Clause 6.17 of Reg. 33(10)read
with Reg. 31(xxxii) of DCPR 2034 as requested by Architect. Subject to NOC
from concern electric supply company shall be obtained before OCC of
buildings u/ref.
24. Entrance Lobby:-

In the instant case, Architect has proposed 2 Nos. of entrance lobbies for
Rehab Commercial Building. no.1 at the Ground floor having height of stilt of
maximum 4.95 mts., 03 entrance lobbies for Rehab Commercial Building. no.4 at
Ground floor having height of stilt of maximum 4.20 mts. and 2 entrance lobbies
for rehab commercial component having floor height of 4.90 mts. and 4 No.
entrance lobbies for rehab residential component at Rehab Slum dwellers
Building No. 3 at the Ground floor having height of stilt of maximum 4.90 mts.
free of FSI as per Reg. 31(1) (xxi) of DCPR-2034 as seen on plan as at pg. C-1357
to C-1419 and requested to allow the same.
25. Toilet for Rehab Commercial shops :-

The Architect has proposed toilets for commercial t/s. for Gent &
Ladies as per table no.13 of reg. 36 of DCPR 2034 as tabulated below:
Sr. Bldg.s Floor Gents Ladies Area in Remark

No. sq.mtr.
1 Rehab Ground 2 2 13.80
Commercial 1st 2 2 9.40
Building. 2nd 2 2 9.40
no.1
2 Rehab Ground 2 4 26.74
Commercial 1st 2 4 24.00 The same is
Building. 2nd 2 4 24.00 counted in
no.4 3rd 2 4 24.00 sale FSI.
3 Rehab Slum Ground 4 nos. 4 nos. 42.06
dweller
1st 6 nos. 8 nos. 51.56
Building
no.3 2nd 6 nos. 8 nos. 51.56
3rd 6 nos. 8 nos. 51.56
4th 3 nos. 3 nos. 25.66
Total --- 39 53
92
nos. toilets proposed for rehab commercial t/s. in Rehab Commercial Building.
no.1,4 & Rehab Slum dwellers Building no. 3 as tabulated above by counting
its area in sale FSI as per table no.13 of reg. 36 of DCPR 2034 as shown on
plan at pg. 1357 to C-1419 and has requested to allow the same.
26. Built-over Arch:-

Reference is requested to para sidelined ‘Z’ point no. 29 of “Build over
Arch” as at pg.N-87 are requested to allow built-over arch having of width 6.43
mts. wide with 6.00 mts. cleared internal height below 2 nd floor at rehab slum
dweller bldg. no.3 free of FSI for vehicular & pedestrian access to residential
slum dwellers additional under clause 6.24 of Appendix – IV of DCR 33(10)
read with Appendix – XI of reg. 12 sub-reg. 1 of DCR 1991 as requested by L.
Surveyor Submitted to then Hon’ble CEO(SRA) at pg.N-9 to 171 and then
Hon’ble CEO(SRA)’s approval thereon at pg.N-170 may please be seen.
The Architect has proposed a 2 nos. of double height built-over arch
having width 6.00 mts. with clear internal height of 9.35 mts. i.e. below 2 nd
floor at Rehab Slum dwellers building no.3 free of FSI for vehicular &
pedestrian access to the residential component of Rehab Slum dwellers
Building no. 3, deriving through 9.00 mts. & 12.20 mtr. wide internal pathway
/access connecting to 24.40 mts. wide S.S. Amrutwar Marg & 6.00 mts. wide
existing road and also he has proposed built-over arch at rehab commercial
building no.4 having width 2.00 mtr. with clear internal height of 4.60 mts.
below 1st floor free of FSI for vehicular & pedestrian access to the commercial
component of rehab commercial building no.4, directly accessible connecting
to 24.40 mts. wide S.S. Amrutwar Marg as per Reg. 23(4) of DCPR 2034 as
shown on plan at pg.C-1357 to C-1419 & has requested to allow the same.
There is no specific provision for built-over arch in DCPR 2034.
The Architect vide his representation at pg. C-1421 to C-1429 have
proposed the Built-over arch for residential slum dwellers access due to
planning constraints like odd and narrow shape of plot, huge nos. of
tenements to be accommodated, large plot under road set-back etc. & has
thus, requested to allow the same subject to CFO NOC of MCGM.

In view of above, Hon’ble CEO(SRA) orders are requested to allow 2 nos.
of double height Built-over Arch having width 6.00 mts. wide with 9.35 mts.
clear internal height i.e. below 2nd floor at Rehab Slum dwellers Building no.3
& built over arch having width 2.00 mts. wide with 4.60 mts. clear internal
‘T’ height at rehab commercial building no.4 free of FSI for vehicular &
pedestrian access to rehab residential slum dwellers & CFO point of view
under clause 6.17 of Reg. 33(10) read with Reg. 23(4) of DCPR 2034 as
requested by Architect. Subject to CFO NOC of MCGM before further C.C.to
building u/ref.
27. D. G. Set room :-

Reference is requested to para sidelined ‘Z1’ point no. 31 of “D. G. Set
room” as at pg. N-89 to allow space for diesel generator (D.G.) set for the rehab
buildings 3 at ground floor by counting its area in rehab compensatory
fungible FSI and renewal (tenement) bldg. no.2 at ground floor by counting its
area in sale FSI as the same is as per the requirement of the C.F.O. MCGM
subject to NOC from C.F.O.MCGM before granting further C.C. to the building
u/ref. submitted to Hon’ble CEO(SRA) at pg.N-09 to N-171 and approval
thereon at pg.C-170 may please be seen.
The Architect has proposed D.G. set room within bldg. line having size of
3.49 x 3.05 ,1.63 x 1.20 & 0.71 X 1.20 mts. and area adm. 16.36 sq.mts. for
Rehab Slum Dwellers Building no.3 at ground floor free of FSI as shown on
plan as at C-1357 to C-1419 as per reg. 31(1) (xxix) of DCPR 2034 and
28. Loading/unloading area for transport vehicle:-
Architect has proposed two nos. of loading/unloading area for transport
vehicle with inadequate size due to planning constraints and odd shape of plot,
large nos. of slum dwellers to be rehabilitated, major portion of plot affected by
D.P. road etc. The one nos. of the same on South West side & another one on
North East side of bldg. under reference within building line for the loading
and unloading of goods of large number of rehab commercial shops at all floors
of Rehab Slum dwellers Building no. 3 free of FSI as shown on plan at pg. C-
1357 to C-1419 as per Reg.44 (5) read with Cl. 6.17 of reg.33(10) of DCPR
2034 and requested to allow the same.
The details of the loading/unloading areas is as tabulated below:-

Sr. Bldg. Size Location Total
No. no.
1 3 3.56 x 6.25 Ground floor 24.30
2 3 3.56 x 6.55 Ground floor 23.19
Architect vide his representation as at pg. C-1421 to C-1429 has stated

that the loading/unloading area are proposed for loading/unloading goods for
large number of commercial t/s. and has thus requested to allow the same.
In view of above, Hon’ble CEO(SRA)’s orders are requested to allow

proposed two nos. of loading/unloading area for transport vehicle with
inadequate size due to planning constraints and odd shape of plot, large nos. of
‘U’ slum dwellers to be rehabilitated, major portion of plot affected by D.P. road
etc. as one nos. at South West side & another one on North East side of all
floors of Rehab Slum dwellers Building no. 3 for the loading and unloading of
goods of large number of rehab commercial shops free of FSI as per Reg.44 (5)
read with Cl. 6.17 of reg.33(10) of DCPR 2034 as requested by Architect.
29. Glass glazing :-
Architect has proposed ornamental projection of cladding/ glass façade/
glazing not exceeding 0.30 mtr. from building line at all upper floor commercial
shops i.e. from 1st floor onwards for non-residential building component at
floors 1st to 4th at Rehab Slum dwellers Building no. 3 & also for rehab
commercial building no.1 & 4 free of FSI as per reg. 31(1) (xxiv) of DCPR 2034
as shown on plan at pg. C-1357 to C-1419 and requested to allow the same.
The open space in front of glazing from the plot boundary i.e. the front
open space is 0.00 mts. for rehab slum dwellers building no.3, rehab
commercial building no.1 & 4 instead of required 2.50 mts. as per reg.42 (ii)(e)
(ii) of DCPR 2034.
The Architect vide his representation as at pg C-1421 to C-1429 has
stated that due to planning constrains odd & narrow shape of plot large no of
rehab commercial shops & residential units to be accommodated, major road
setback affecting the plot thereby availability of very small buildable plot,
various building utilities & services like IC, water supply pipes, electric supply
cables & storm water drains etc. it is not possible to provide the glass
glazing / elevation projections with open space at 2.50 mts. as required as per
reg. 42(ii)(e)(ii) of DCPR 2034 & thus, he has requested to allow the same.
In view of above, Hon’ble CEO(SRA)’s orders are requested to allow glass

façade/ glazing at 0.00 m from building line at all upper floor commercial
shops i.e. from 1st floor onwards for non-residential building component at
‘V’ floors 1st to 4th at Rehab Slum dwellers Building no. 3 & also for rehab
commercial building no.1 & 4 free of FSI with open space in front of glazing
from the plot boundary i.e. the front open space is zero mts. for rehab slum
dwellers building no.3 , rehab commercial building no.1 & 4 instead of
required 2.50 mts. due to planning constraints as explained above under
clause 6.17 of reg.33(10) read with reg. 31(1) (xxiv), 42(ii)(e)(ii) of DCPR 2034 as
requested by the Architect.
30. Variable refrigment volume (VRV) platform: -

Architect has proposed Variable refringent volume (VRV) platform for use
of commercial shops for VRV/A.C. unit having sizes of 4.10 x 1.20 & 7.42 x
1.20,4.33 x 0.90 & 7.42 x 0.90 upto commercial floors at rehab slum dwellers
building no.3 & of size 3.40 x 1.20 in front of staircases at all floors of rehab
commercial building no.1 & of 9.01 x 1.20 in front of staircases at all floors of
rehab commercial building no. 4 with the height not less than 0.60 mts. above
floor level, for commercial shops with stringent reduced open space of 1.80
mts. instead of 2.50 mtr. required free of FSI as per reg. 42(ii) (e) (iii) & reg.31
(1) ii of DCPR 2034 as shown on plan at pg. C-1357 to C-1419 and requested
to allow the same.
In view of above, Hon’ble CEO(SRA)’s order are requested to allow Variable

refringent volume (VRV) platform for use of commercial shops for VRV/A.C.
unit having sizes of 4.10 x 1.20 & 7.42 x 1.20,4.33 x 0.90 & 7.42 x 0.90 upto
commercial floors at rehab slum dwellers building no.3 & of size 3.40 x 1.20 in
front of staircases at all floors of rehab commercial building no.1 & of 9.01 x
‘W’ 1.20 in front of staircases at all floors of rehab commercial building no. 4 for
commercial floors with the height not less than 0.60 mtr. above floor level, in
front of all staircases for commercial shops with stringent reduced open space
of 1.80 mts. instead of 2.50 mtr. required free of FSI Cl. under 6.17 read with
under reg. 42(ii) (e) (iii) & reg.31(1) ii of DCPR 2034 as requested by Architect.
31. Fire ducts & Electric/ L.V. Ducts :-
Reference is requested to para sidelined ‘Z2’ point no. 33 of “L.V.,
Electric & Fire Ducts” as at pg.N-89 to allow electrical, fire ducts & L.V. ducts
with services slabs for carrying utilities/services through these ducts having
various sizes as tabulated above in renewal (tenement) bldg. no.02 by
counting its BUA into rehab FSI and by counting its BUA into rehab fungible
compensatory FSI without charging premium for all floors in Rehab building
no.3, as per clause 6.24 of Appendix–IV of Reg. 33(10) read with new Reg. 35(4)
of amended DCR 1991, as requested by Architect, submitted to then Hon’ble
CEO(SRA) at pg.N-07 to N-171 and then Hon’ble CEO(SRA)’s approval thereon
at pg.C-170 may please be seen.
The Architect has proposed fire ducts, electrical & low voltage ducts for
carrying of conduits, pipes etc. for various utilities /services like electric supply
and L.V. supply at all floors by counting its area in rehab fungible
compensatory FSI at Rehab Commercial Building no. 1 & 4 and Rehab Slum
dwellers Building no. 3 as per reg. 31(1) (xxxi) read with Reg. 31(3) of DCPR
2034 as shown on the plans as at pg. C-1357 to C-1419 and requested to allow
the same. The details of fire, electrical & low voltage ducts proposed are as
tabulated as below:
Sr. Building no. Size Total Location Remarks
No.
1. Rehab Slum dwellers 2.22 x 1.10 x 2 4.88 Typical floor 4 nos. electric
Building no. 3 2.72 x 1.10 x 2 5.98 (Wing ‘A’ to ‘D’) duct
2.22 x 0.75 x 2 3.33 Typical floor 8 nos. L.V.
2.72 x 0.75 x 2 4.08 (Wing ‘A’ to ‘D’) Ducts
3.86 x 0.54 x 3 5.87
2.25 x 0.62 x 1 0.78
1.20 x 2.00 x 4 9.60 Typical floor 4 nos. fire duct
(Wing ‘A’ to ‘D’)
2. Rehab Commercial 1.57 x 0.29 x 2 0.91 Typical floor 2 nos. electric
Building no.1 (Wing ‘A’ & ‘B’) duct
1.57 x 0.29 x 2 0.91 Typical floor 2 nos. L.V.
(Wing ‘A’ & ‘B’) Ducts
3. Rehab Commercial 1.00 x 0.50 0.50 1st to 3rd floor 1 nos. electric
Building no.4 ducts.
From the above table it is seen that the fire, electrical & low voltage
ducts proposed at Rehab Slum dwellers Building no. 3 are having clear depth
more than 0.45 mts. at all floors as seen on plan at pg. C-1357 to C-1419. The
Architect vide his letter at pg. C-1421 to C-1429 have stated that the building
under reference is exceptionally high and accommodates a large number of
tenements as such a large number of conduits for electric supply and low
voltage cables are required to pass through these ducts and as a result it is not
possible to propose these ducts with clear depth of 0.45 mts. as per the
requirements of the MEP Consultant and thus he has requested to allow ducts
with depth more than 0.45 mts. He has also proposed ducts touching to
habitable rooms due to planning constraints and requested to allow the same.
In view of above, Hon’ble CEO (SRA)’s orders are requested to allow the
proposed fire, electrical & low voltage ducts for carrying pipes etc. for various
utilities /services like electric supply and L.V. supply at all floors having sizes
‘X’
and areas as tabulated above with depth of ducts more than 0.45 mts.
touching to habitable rooms by counting its area in rehab fungible
compensatory FSI for Rehab Commercial Building no. 1 & 4 and Rehab Slum
dwellers Building no. 3 under clause 6.17 of Reg. 33(10) read with reg. 31(1)
(xxxi) & 31(3) of DCPR 2034 as requested by Architect.
32. Temple :-
Architect has proposed 04 nos. of temple as per Scrutiny sheet from
Tahsildar–1 (Special Cell) (SRA) vide /no. Kra.tahasi-1vik/Nehru nagar/21/63
dtd. 03/01/2022 in Rehab Commercial Building no. 1 i.e. proposed 1 nos. of
ground + 1st upper floor temple having area adm. 109.74 sq.mtr. & has also
proposed 1 more ground + 1st upper floor temple combined for 03 nos. of
temples having total area adm. 180.00 i.e. 90.00 sq.mtr. each at ground + 1 st
floor on south side of building under ref. each with internal staircase having
flight width 1.20 mtr. by counting its area into Sale FSI as provision for non-
eligible temples as shown in the plan as at pg. C-1357 to C-1419. The height of
Temple portion at ground floor is 4.20 mtr. and at 1st floor is 4.20 mts.
The Architect has also proposed 1 no. of temple within the building line
of rehab commercial building no.4 having height 4.20 mts. directly accessible
from 24.40 mts. wide S.S.Amrutwar Marg as shown on plan at pg.C-1357 to C-
1419 by counting its area in sale FSI as provision for non-eligible temple &
requested to allow the same. The Architect vide his representation as at
pg. C-1421 to C-1429 has stated that the 5 temples proposed are existing on
site. Further, he has stated that due to odd & narrow shape of plot, large no of
slum dwellers to be accommodated, major road set back provisions, of various
services for CFO, Environmental clearance etc. it is not possible to provided
separate temple structures with adequate open spaces. Thus, Architect has
stated that as requested by his clients to allow 4 nos. of temples at rehab
commercial building no.1 out of which 1 temple comprises ground + 1 st upper
floor temple & another ground + 1 st upper floor temple is for 3 combined
Temples proposed within bldg. line & he has proposed 1 no. of temple at
ground floor of rehab commercial building no.4 within the building line &
requested to allow the provision of these non-eligible temples by counting it
area in sale FSI at this stage to be handed over subject to eligibility of the
same. He has requested to allow the same by insisting NOC from the Police
Department & CFO of MCGM before granting C.C. to the temples building or
granting C.C. to temple structure.
Further, for allowing 3 nos. of temples to be proposed as a single

combined temple of ground + 1st upper floor, also for allowing another ground +
1st upper floor temple within the building line with internal staircase at rehab
commercial building no.1 & 1 rehab temple at ground floor within the building
line of rehab commercial building no.4 as per the standard policy adopted the
NOC from the trustees / owner of temples in insisted. However, the developer /
Architect vide their letter at pg. C-1421 to C-1429 & 1431 to 1439 has stated
that these temples under slum portion are in the alignment of the proposed
D.P.Roads & as such they have requested not to insist the NOC from the
trustees / owner of temples for implementation of the scheme as per clause (D)
of MCGM letter 21.7.2018 at pg.C-1489.
In view of above, Hon’ble CEO (SRA)’s orders are requested to allow

proposed 05 nos. of non- eligible temple as per Scrutiny sheet from Tahsildar–
1 (Special Cell) (SRA) vide /no. Kra.tahasi-1vik/Nehru nagar/21/63 dtd.
03/01/2022 out of which 4 nos. of temples at rehab commercial building
no.1 out of which 1 temple comprises ground + 1 st upper floor temple &
‘Y’ another ground + 1st upper floor temple is for 3 combined Temples proposed
within bldg. line on south side of building under ref. with internal staircase
having flight width 1.20 mtr. & proposed 1 no. of temple at ground floor of
rehab commercial building no.4 within the building line by counting its area
into Sale FSI at this stage having height of Temple portion 4.20 mtr. without
insisting the NOC from the Trustees/ Owners of the temples as per clause (D)
of MCGM Letter dtd. 21.7.2018 under clause 6.17 of Reg. 33(10) of DCPR
2034 as explained above Subject to NOC from Police Department & CFO of
MCGM before granting C.C. to the temples building or granting C.C. to temple
structure to be handed over subject to its eligibility.
33. Internal staircase for rehab temples user:

Reference is requested to para sidelined ‘Z2’ point no. 33 “Internal
staircase for 02 rehab temple user” to allow a internal staircase free of FSI
each having flight width 1.00 mt. having cutout of size 2.11 mts. x 3.25 mts. at
1st floor slab at north side for 02 nos. of rehab temple comprising of Ground +
1 upper floors at rehab building no.1 i.e. Temple no. 17 & 18 without charging
premium as per modified Regulation 35(2) (iii) & (iv) read with clause 6.21 of
Appendix – IV of Reg. 33(10) of amended DCR 1991 as requested by the L.S.
CEO(SRA)’s approval thereon at pg.C-170 may please be seen.
The Architect has now proposed internal staircase each having flight
width 1.20 mt. for 02 nos. of rehab temple structure comprising of Ground + 1
upper floors at Rehab Commercial building no.1 i.e. Temple Survey no. 138,
277,278 & 125 of the bldg. Thus, he has counted the area of internal staircase
for these 2 rehab Temple Survey no. 138,277,278 & 125 free of FSI without
charging premium as per Reg. 31(1)(iii), (iv) & (xxv) read with clause 6.14 of
reg. 33(10) of DCPR 2034 and requested to allow the same.
34. To allow 27.89 Sq. Mts. (300.00 Sq. Ft.) units on each floor with
inadequate size of rooms.:
Rehab Residential / H.S. T/s :-
Architect has proposed the Rehab Slum dwellers Building no.3
comprising of 3 level basement +Ground + 1st to 22nd upper floor having height
75.03 mtr. for 409 t/s. (i.e. 296 rehab resi.,09 R/C, 101 Extra PAP & 03 H.S.
tenement) rehab residential tenements as shown on plan at pg. C-1357 to C-
1419 with rehab residential / H.S. units varying from 27.89 Sq.mt. to 27.91
Sq.mt. of adequate size of room as per Reg. 37 (2) table14,(sr.no. 1,2,10 & 11)
of DCPR 2034 and requested to allow the same.
35. Amenities for rehab slum dweller:-
1) Reference is requested to para sidelined ‘P’ point no. 18 of “Amenities for
rehab slum dweller bldg. no.3” as at pg.N-63 are requested 1) to allow 06
number of Balwadi each having carpet area adm. 25.29 sq.mtr. at 3rd
floor & 06 number of Welfare centers each having maximum carpet area
adm. 25.68 sq.mts. at 3rd floor by counting the corresponding BUA of
20.90 sq.mts. free of FSI & towards rehab component and consequently
counting its area towards sale component & 06 no. of society office each
having maxi. area adm.25.88 sq.mts. at 17 th floor of the rehab slum
dweller bldg. no.03 by counting the corresponding BUA of 20.90 sq.mts.
free of FSI due to planning constraints & towards rehab component and
consequently counting its area in Sale component as requested by
Architect under clause 6.24, 8.1 to 8.3 of Appendix – IV of DCR 33(10)
read with reg. 38(11) of DCR 1991 amended upto date
2) To allow 02 number of Balwadi each having maxi. carpet area adm.
25.88 sq.mtr. at 18th floor & 02 number of Welfare centers each having
maximum carpet area adm. 25.68 sq.mts. at 18 th floor by counting the
corresponding BUA of 20.90 sq.mts. free of FSI & towards rehab
component and rehab consequently counting its area towards Sale FSI &
02 no. of society office having area adm.25.68 sq.mts. at 18 th floor of the
rehab slum dweller bldg. no.03 by counting the corresponding BUA of
20.90 sq.mts. free of FSI & towards rehab component and rehab
consequently counting it’s area towards Sale component for adjoining
slum pocket due to planning constraints as per the request of L.
Surveyor under clause 6.24 read with 8.1, 8.2, 8.3 of Appendix-IV of
Reg.33(10) read with reg. 38(11) of DCR 1991 amended up to date
submitted to then Hon’ble CEO(SRA) at pg.N-09 to C-171 and then
The Architect has proposed total 667 nos. (296 nos. Resi., 243 nos.
Comm., 09 nos. R/C, 15 nos. of existing amenity, 101 nos. of Extra PAP & 03
nos. H.S. (Homeless Shelter) tenements for rehabilitation of slum dwellers in
the Rehab Commercial Building no.1 & 4 and Rehab Slum dwellers Building
no.3 in the subject S. R. Scheme.
As such there are 3 nos. of Skill Development Centers, Yuva

Kendra/Library, Balwadies, Welfare Centers of 27.88 Sq.mt. each and 07 nos.
of society offices of 20.00 Sq.mt. each and community hall are required as per
Clause 8.1, 8.2 & 8.3 of DCPR 2034.
In this case, Architect has proposed 3 nos. of Balwadies i.e. 2 number

and 1 number of Balwadi at sixth and seven floor respectively and 3 number of
Skill Development Centre, Yuva Kendra, Welfare Centers of 27.88 Sq.mt. each
having carpet area from 28.74 sq.mtr. to 28.94 sq.mts. at 7th floor and at
Rehab Slum dwellers building no. 3 and total 07 nos. of Society Offices out of
which 05 nos. of society office at 6th floor of the Rehab Slum dwellers building
No.3, 01 nos. society office having area adm. 17.23 sq.mt. at 2 nd floor of Rehab
Commercial Building no.1 and 01 nos. society office having area adm. 17.17
sq.mt. at 3rd floor of Rehab Commercial bldg. no.4 and by counting the
proportionate corresponding BUA upto 27.88 Sq.mts. towards rehab
component without counting in FSI and by counting the excess area beyond
27.88 sq.mts. for Balwadi, Welfare Centers, Skill Development Center,
Yuvakendra /Library & beyond 20.00 sq.mts. for society office in sale FSI and
community hall of area adm. 200.00 sq.mt. as against required 200 sq.mt.
lesser of Or 2% of rehab BUA of all buildings or 200 sq.mtr. whichever is less
at three locations on 4th ,7th & 20th floor each of Rehab Slum dwellers
Building no.3 as per clause 8.1, 8.2 and 8.3 of Reg. 33(10) read with reg. 37(9)
and cl. 6.17 of reg.33(10) of DCPR 2034.
However, Architect vide his representation at pg. C-1421 to C-1429 has

stated that due to planning constraints odd shape of plot, high density of slum
dwellers & also due to huge number of Rehab comm. shop, huge portion of plot
in road set-back etc. the required amenities are proposed as stated above at
upper floors and also proposed the community hall of area adm. 200.00 sq.mt.
against required 200 sq.mtr. at three floors i.e. 4 th ,7th & 20th floors i.e. at
higher floor of Rehab Slum dwellers Building no.3 free of FSI & he has thus
In view of above, Hon’ble CEO(SRA)’s orders are requested to allow total 3

nos. of Balwadies out of which 2 number and 1 number of Balwadi at sixth and
seven floor respectively and 3 number of Skill Development Centre, Yuva
Kendra/Library, Welfare Centers of 27.88 Sq.mt. each having carpet area from
28.74 sq.mtr. to 28.94 sq.mts. at 7th floor in Rehab Slum dwellers building no. 3
and total 07 nos. of Society Offices out of which 05 nos. of society office at 6th
floor of the Rehab Slum dwellers building no. 3, 01 nos. society office having area
‘Z’
adm. 17.23 sq.mt. at 2nd floor of Rehab Commercial Building no.1 and 01 nos.
society office having area adm. 17.17 sq.mt. at 3rd floor of Rehab Commercial bldg.
no.4 and by counting the proportionate corresponding BUA upto 27.88 Sq.mts.
towards rehab component without counting in FSI and by counting the excess
area beyond 27.88 sq.mts. for Balwadi, Welfare Centers, Skill Development
Center, Yuvakendra /Library & beyond 20.00 sq.mts. for society office in sale FSI
and community hall of area adm. 200.00 sq.mt. as against required 200 sq.mt.
lesser of Or 2% of rehab BUA of all buildings or 200 sq.mtr. whichever is less at
three locations on 4th,7th & 20th floor each of Rehab Slum dwellers Building
no.3 as per clause 8.1, 8.2 and 8.3 of Reg 33(10) read with reg. 37(9) and cl. 6.17
of reg.33(10) of DCPR 2034 due to planning constrains as explained above as
36. Vertical Fins :-
The Architect has proposed vertical fins maximum upto 1.20 mts. all
around at all residential floors for the entire rehab slum dwellers building no.3
by counting its area once in rehab fungible compensatory FSI as shown on
plan at pg.C-1357 to C-1419 & requested to allow the same.
As per reg.31(1)(xii) of DCPR 2034 ornamental projection / vertical fins

projecting not more than 1.20 mts. from the face of the building shall be
allowed free of FSI.
ornamental projection / vertical fins proposed cannot be misused & thus he
requested to all the same by counting its area once in fungible compensatory
FSI. Further, Architect has stated that he has proposed the vertical fins at all
floors with adequate open space at all sides of rehab slum dwellers building
no.3.

vertical fins maximum upto 1.20 mts projecting from the building line at all
‘Z1’ residential floors for the entire rehab slum dwellers building no.3 by counting
its area once in rehab fungible compensatory FSI as stated above by counting
its area once in FSI, with adequate open space at all sides of rehab slum
dwellers building no.3 as per reg. 31(1)(xii) of DCPR 2034 as requested by the
Architect.
37. Service and ventilation duct abutting to sanitary blocks (Toilet):
Reference is requested to para sidelined ‘Z3’ point no. 33 of “Service and
ventilation duct abutting to sanitary blocks (Toilet)” as at pg.N-91 are
requested to allow the service and ventilation ducts of varying sizes with
service slabs for carrying plumbing services having maximum width upto 2.00
mts. as tabulated above free of FSI for High rise renewal (tenement) bldg. no.2
& High rise rehab slum dwellers bldg. no.3 as per modified Reg. 35(2) (xxiii)
read with clause 6.3 of Appendix-IV of Reg. 33(10) of amended DCR 1991.
Submitted to then Hon’ble CEO(SRA) at pg.N-09 to N-171 and then Hon’ble
The Architect has proposed service and ventilation ducts with service
slabs at 1st floor to top most floor of various sizes with maximum width of 1.05
mtr. abutting the toilets in the high rise Rehab Slum dweller Building no. 3 &
has proposed service & ventilation ducts for the toilets blocks & Rehab
Commercial Building no.1 & 4 free of FSI as per the Reg. 31 (1) (xxiii) of DCPR
2034, as shown in the plans as at pg. C-1357 to C-1419 & requested to allow
the same.
In this case, Architect has proposed the service and ventilation ducts
with service slabs as shown on the plans vide at pg.
C-1357 to C-1419 in Rehab Slum dweller Building no. 3 & Rehab Commercial
Building no.1 & 4 with all internal / external ducts of varying sizes upto 2.00
mtr. with service slabs. Further, Architect vide his representation as at pg. C-
1421 to C-1429 has requested to allow proposed service ducts with service
slabs to sanitary blocks in front of toilet required for carrying plumbing services
and for ventilation free of FSI.
In view of above, Hon’ble CEO (SRA)’s approval is requested to allow
service and ventilation ducts with service slabs at 1st floor to top most floor of
‘Z2’ various sizes upto maximum width of 2.00 mtr. abutting the toilets in the high
rise Rehab Slum dweller Building no. 3 & at Rehab Commercial Building no.1
& 4 upto maximum width of 1.20 mts. free of FSI as per the Reg. 31 (1) (xxiii)
of DCPR 2034 as requested by the Architect.
38. Chajja :-
The Architect has proposed chajja at lintel level projecting of maximum of
1.20 mtr. beyond the building line all around for weather protection and 0.60
mts. depth in front of passage of Rehab Slum dwellers Building no.3 & Rehab
Commercial Building no. 1 & 4 by counting its area free of FSI as per reg. 42(ii)
(e)(i) read with reg.31(1)(xii) of DCPR 2034 as shown on plan at pg. C-1357 to
C-1419 by proposing on rear & side of more than 2.50 mts. open space.
Chajja’s of maximum width 1.20 mts. beyond the building line all around for
‘Z3’
weather protection and 0.60 mts. depth in front of passage of Rehab Slum
dwellers Building no.3 & Rehab Commercial Building no. 1 & 4 by counting its
area free of FSI as per reg. 42(ii)(e)(i) read with reg.31(1)(xii) of DCPR 2034 as
39. Travel distance:

Reference is requested to para sidelined ‘Z9’ point no. 40 of “Travels
Distance” as at pg.N-99 orders are requested to allow the travel distance
between the staircase & dead end of corridor maxi. 17.40 mts. for rehab
commercial bldg. no.1, 16.88 mts. for rehab slum dweller bldg.
no.3(commercial component) & 21.21 mtr. for rehab slum dwellers bldg. no.4
as against the required permissible distance of 15.00 and maxi. travel
distance between the staircase & dead end of corridor of 17.79 mts. for rehab
slum dwellers building no.3 (residential component) as against the permissible
distance of 11.25 mtr. due to planning constraints under regulation 6.24 of
Appendix-IV of 33(10) read with reg. 43(2)(ii)(i) of DCR 1991 amended upto
date. Subject to insist the CFO NOC before issue of FCC to buildings under
reference., submitted to then Hon’ble CEO(SRA) at pg.N-09 to N-171 and then
The Architect has proposed travel distance between the staircase to

staircase is maxi. 33.40 mts. for Rehab Commercial Building no.1 and maxi.
39.22 mts. distance between staircase to staircase for Rehab Commercial
Building no.4 as against required permissible distance of 30.00 mts. from
staircase to staircase & 15.00 mtr. From staircase to dead end of corridor as
per reg. 47(3)(ii)(i)(ii) of DCPR-2034 as shown on plan at pg. C-1357 to C-1419
due to planning constraints like odd & narrow shape of plot large no of slum
dwellers to be accommodated major road setback of 24.40 mts. wide S.S.
Amrutwar Marg, large no of commercial shop etc. and thus, he has requested
to allow the same. Further, the Architect has proposed the maximum upto
41.77 mts. between staircase to staircase & 11.97 mts. from staircase to dead
end for residential component & maximum upto 42.73 mts. between staircase
to staircase & 12.94 mts. from staircase to dead end for commercial
component of Rehab Slum dwellers Building no.3 instead of required 30.00
mts. / 15.00 mts. with sprinklers in passages due to planning constraints
under clause 6.17 read with reg. 47(3)(ii)(i)(ii) of DCPR 2034. The Architect has
requested to allow the deficiency in travel distance proposed due to planning
constrains as stated above.

proposed travel distance between the staircase to staircase of 33.40 mts. for
rehab commercial building no.1 & 39.22 mts. from staircase to staircase for
Rehab Commercial Building no. 4 & maximum upto 41.77 mts. between
staircase to staircase & 11.97 mts. from staircase to dead end for residential
component & maximum upto 42.73 mts. between staircase to staircase &
‘Z4’
12.94 mts. from staircase to dead end for commercial component of Rehab
Slum dwellers Building no.3 as against the required permissible distance
30.00 mts. / 15.00 mts. as per reg. 47(3)(ii)(i)(ii) of DCPR 2034 due to
planning constraints as stated above under regulation 6.17 of 33(10) read
with reg. 47(3)(ii)(i)(ii), 47(3)(ii)(i)(i) of DCPR-2034 subject to insist the CFO
NOC before asking further CC to buildings under reference as requested by
the Architect.
40. Chowk :-
In this case, Architect has proposed chowk for ventilation of habitable
rooms (living room/bed room & kitchen) at all floors of rehab slum dweller
bldg. no.3 wing ‘A’ to ‘D’ comprising of 3 level basement + ground + 1 st to 22nd
upper floors having 75.03 mtr. of sizes & area as tabulated below:-
Building Height of Building upto top of Chowk Area Min. width
parapet proposed proposed
Rehab slum dweller 76.23 313.56 11.03
bldg. no.3
It is to be mentioned here that habitable rooms, commercial shops

staircases and passages & toilet are deriving light and ventilation through this
chowk having minimum width 11.03 mts. i.e. more than 3.00 mts. by
considering regular open space for each wing of the building as per reg. 41(8)
(b) of DCPR-2034. The chowk is accessible at ground floor through below both
built over arch portion as shown on plan at pg. C-1357 to C-1419.
chowk is created due to planning constraints as odd shape of plot etc. & the
habitable rooms derive light & ventilation from chowk & the open space
deficiency are work out as per reg. 41(2)(i)(a) of DCPR 2034 & thus, the
Architect has requested to allow chowk free of FSI.
In view of above Hon’ble CEO(SRA)’s approval is requested to allow the
chowk having area 313.56 sq.mts. for light & ventilation of habitable rooms,
‘Z5’ commercial shops, staircases and passages & toilet having minimum width
11.03 mts. i.e. more than 2.40 mts. by considering regular open space for
each wing of the building accessible through below both built over arch
portion for rehab slum dwellers building no.3 free of FSI as per reg. 41(8) (b)
of DCPR-2034 due to planning constraints as explained above as requested
by the Architect.
41. Open Spaces: -

Architect has proposed Rehab comm. bldg.no.1 Basement (pt) + Gr.+ 2 nd
(pt) upper floors having height 13.35 mtr. & Rehab comm. bldg.no.4
comprising of Basement (pt) + Gr.+ 3rd upper floors having height 17.35 mtr.
As per provisions of reg. 41(5) (a) (i) of DCPR 2034, the requirements of
open spaces are as under.
Open Space deficiency table of rehab comm. bldg. no. 1 & 4 :
Building
Front open space = 3.00 mts. (Reg.41(5)(a)(i))
Side & rear marginal O.S. = 3.00 mts.
J.O.S. for rehab slum dwellers building no.3 = 12.00 mts. (3.00 + 9.00)
(Reg.41(5)(a)(i) & (iii))
J.O.S. of rehab tenants building no. 2 = 9.00 mts. (3.00 + 6.00)
(Reg.41(5)(a)(i) & (iii))
J.O.S. of sale building no. 5 = 12.00 mts. (3.00 + 9.00)

(Reg.41(5)(a)(i) & 41(2)(i)(a)
table ‘A’ sr.no.4)
Basement
F.O.S. from road = 3 .00 mts. (Reg.37(7)(i))
O.S. at other sides = 1.50 mts. ((Reg.37(7)(i))
J.O.S. for basement of
Sale building no.5 (depth = 10.20 mts.) = 4.50 mts. (1.50 + 3.00)
(Reg.37(7)(i))
J.O.S. Rehab slum dwellers building no.3
(depth = 12.43 mts.) = 4.50 mts. (1.50 + 3.00)
(Reg.37(7)(i))
J. O.S. for basement of
Rehab tenants building no.2
(depth = 8.38 mts.) = 3.00 mts. (1.50 + 1.50)
(Reg.37(7)(i))
Rehab comm. bldg. no.1 height of building 13.35 mts.
Basement (pt)
Side O.S. req.(m) O.S. prop.(m) Defi. Defi. (%) Remark
North 4.50 0.00 4.50 100% JOS between Rehab comm.
(1.50 + 3.00) bldg. no.1 and Rehab slum
dwellers bldg. no.3
East 3.00 0.00 3.00 100% JOS between rehab comm.
(1.50 + 1.50) bldg. no.1 and renewal
tenement bldg.no.2 33(7)
bldg. no.2.
South 4.50 More than Nil Nil JOS between rehab comm.
(1.50 + 3.00) 4.50 bldg. no.1 and sale bldg.no.5
West 3.00 1.00 2.00 66.66% FOS from 24.40 mtr. wide
D.P. Road known as S.S.
Amrutwar Marg.
Building
North 3.00 + 9.00 = 9.00 3.00 25.00% JOS between Rehab
12.00 Commercial bldg. no.1 and
rehab slum dwellers bldg.
no.3
East 3.00 + 6.00 7.00 2.00 22.22% JOS between rehab comm.
= 9.00 bldg. no.1 and renewal
tenement bldg.no.2 33(7)
bldg. no.2
South 3.00 + 9.00 9.00 3.00 25.00% JOS between Rehab
= 12.00 Commercial bldg. no.1 and
sale bldg. no.5
West 3.00 0.00 3.00 100% FOS from 24.40 mtr. wide
Amrutwar Marg.
Rehab comm. bldg. no.4 height of building 17.35 mts.

Building
Basement (pt)
Side O.S. req.(m) O.S. prop.(m) Defi. Defi. (%) Remark
North 1.50 More than Nil Nil From plot boundary
1.50
East 1.50 1.50 Nil Nil From plot boundary
South 1.50 More than Nil Nil From plot boundary
1.50
Amrutwar Marg.
Building
3.00.
East 3.00 1.30 1.70 56.66% From plot boundary
South 3.00 More than Nil Nil From plot boundary
3.00
Amrutwar Marg.
Rehab slum dweller bldg. no.3 height of building 75.03 mts.

Building
Front open space = 3.00 mts. (Reg.41(4) table 18
sr.no.2)
Side & rear marginal O.S. = 9.00 mts. (Reg.41(5)(a)(iii))
J.O.S. of rehab tenement building no. 2 = 15.00 mts.(9.00 + 6.00)
(Reg.41(5)(a)(iii))
J.O.S. of rehab Comm. building no. 1 = 12.00 mts. (3.00 + 9.00)

(Reg.41(5)(a)(iii))
Basement (depth = 12.43 mts.)
O.S. at other sides = 3.00 mts. (Reg.37(7)(i))

Rehab commercial building no.1
(depth = 3.45 mts.) = 4.50 mts.(3.00 + 1.50) (Reg.37(7)
(i))
Rehab tenants tenement building no.2
(depth = 8.38 mts.) = 4.50 mts. (3.00 + 1.50) (Reg.37(7)
(i))
Basement
Side O.S. req.(m) O.S. prop. Deficiency Deficiency Remark
(m) (%)
3.00 (Below 12.20 mts. wide
road.)
East 3.00 0.00 3.00 100% From existing 6.00
mts. wide 63k road/
plot boundary
South 4.50 0.00 4.50 100% JOS between rehab
(3.00 + 1.50) slum dwellers bldg.
no.3 and rehab
commercial bldg.
no.1 / renewal bldg.
no.2.
West 3.00 3.00 0.00 0.00% FOS from 24.40 mtr.
wide D.P. Road known
as S.S. Amrutwar
Marg.
Building
North More than Nil Nil
Commercial 9.00
Residential 9.00 More than Nil Nil From plot boundary
9.00
East 0.00 9.00 100% From existing 6.00
Commercial 9.00 mts. wide 63k road/
plot boundary.
Residential 9.00 2.76 6.238 69.31% From plot boundary
South 15.00 8.11 6.89 45.93% JOS between renewal

Commercial (9.00 + 6.00) tenement bldg. no.2
Residential 7.61 7.39 49.26% and rehab slum dweller
bldg. no.3.
West 0.00 9.00 100% FOS from 24.40 mtr.

Commercial 9.00 wide D.P. Road known
as S.S. Amrutwar
Residential 2.50 6.50 72.22% Marg.
Chowk
North / 9.00 + 9.00 = 27.85 Nil Nil JOS between wing ‘A’,
South 18.00 ‘B’ & wing ‘C’, ‘D’
East /West 9.00 + 9.00 = 14.13 3.87 21.50% JOS between wing
18.00 ‘A’,‘D’ & wing ‘B’, ‘C’
Between 9.00 + 9.00 = 11.03 6.97 38.72% JOS between wing ‘A’,
staircases 18.00 ‘D’ & wing ‘B’, ‘C’
It is seen from the above table that the open space deficiency of the
buildings is as under :-
1. Rehab commercial building no. 1 varies from 66.66% to 100% for the
basement & varies from 22.22% to 100% for building above,
2. Rehab commercial building no.4 is upto 100% of basement & varies from
50% to 100% for building above &
3. Rehab slum dweller building no.3 varies from upto 100% for basement &
varies from 38.72% to 100% for building above.
Architect has represented the hardship justifying the deficiency in open
space which is as under:-
(i) Small & odd size of plot to rehabilitate the slum dwellers.
(ii) Large number of slum dwellers,
(iii) major plot affected by road set-back.
(iv) 12.20 mts. wide proposed road.
(v) Amenity plot u/reg.14 of DCPR 2034
(vi) Large number of rehab commercial shops etc.
(vii) Availability of only approximate 56% of buildable plot for rehab &
sale buildings.
Therefore, Architect has requested to condone the deficiency in the open

spaces for the rehab comm. bldg. no.1 & 4 & rehab slum dwellers building
no.3 as stated above as per provisions Reg.41(5)(a)(i) & (iii), 41(2)(i)(a) table ‘A’
sr.no.4 Reg.37(7)(i) & Reg.41(4) table 18 sr.no.2 read with 6.17 of 33(10) of
DCPR 2034.
The requirement of open spaces vis-n-vis requested relaxation as per the

provisions of Reg. No. 6(b) of DCPR 2034, is verified as per given provisions in
respect of following aspects.
In this context Architect has submitted his certificate vide pg. C/1667
i) Health Safety:
The open spaces around the building are proposed to be paved and
surface drainage arrangement is proposed to be provided as per the
requirement of SWD department of MCGM or SWD consultant.
Besides License plumber is appointed for design & supervision of
drainage work, the completion certificate from license plumber shall be insisted
revised drainage requirement will be incorporated in approval conditions.
ii) Fire Safety:

The compliance of Fire safety measures is incorporated as a condition of
approval of amended plans being sought. The completion certificates from CFO
shall be insisted before grant of OCC.
iii) Structural Safety:

Architect has not submitted the structural design, drawing &
calculations as per plans. The same will be insisted before granting plinth C.C.
A condition to that effect will be incorporated in plans approval letter. Further
structural stability certificate from the appointed License Structural Engineer
shall be insisted after completion of the building. Structural stability of the
building is thus taken care.
iv) Public Safety:

Considering the above aspects of Health safety, Fire safety and
structural safety, public safety is taken care.
The Architect vide his representation at pg. C-1421 to C-1429 has stated
that the basement of rehab commercial building no.1 is at a distance of 1.00
mts. at west side abutting 24.40 mts. wide S.S.Amrutwar Marg instead of 3.00
mts. & north & east side to basement of rehab slum dwellers building no. 3 &
renewal tenant building no.2 at zero open space. The Architect has proposed
the building line above at west side abutting 24.40 mts. S.S.Amrutwar Marg at
zero open space instead of required 3.00 mts. & he has requested to allow the
same.
Further, the basement of rehab commercial building no.4 at west side
abutting 24.40 mts. wide S.S.Amrutwar Marg is at zero open space instead of
3.00 mts. required as per DCPR 2034. The Architect has proposed the building
line above at west side abutting 24.40 mts. S.S.Amrutwar Marg at zero open
space instead of required 3.00 mts. & he has requested to allow the same.
The basement of rehab slum dwellers building no.3 at east side abutting
6.00 mts. wide existing road is at zero open space. The basement at south side
is touching the basement of rehab renewal tenants building no.2 & rehab
commercial building no.1 at zero open space due to planning constraints. The
building above is at maximum zero open space adjoining to the 24.40 mts.
S.S.Amurtwar Marg at west side & existing 6.00 wide road at east side.
The Architect vide his letter at pg.C-1421 to C-1429 has stated that as
stated above there are various planning constraints like large area of plot is
affected by road setback, large number of slum dwellers to be accommodated
plot for AOS to be carved out to be handed over to MCGM, provision of layout
R.G. on mother earth etc. Additionally, now they have proposed 12.20 mts.
road passing through the plot at north side as an access to the municipal plot
bearing C.S.no.437(pt).
Since, to restrict earlier proposed maximum building height of rehab
buildings to approximately 70.00 mts. & to restrict the floors of large number
of rehab commercial shops to 4 floors they had to stretch footprint of buildings
to zero open space abutting the roads to make the scheme viable, as such the
deficiency for the basement is maximum 100%.
In view of the above Hon’ble CEO(SRA)’s orders are requested to condone

the deficiency in open space by charging premium for rehab component
‘Z6’ maximum upto 100% for the basement & for the building line above
considering the exceptional difficulties explained by Architect at para sidelined
‘s’ above under clause 6.17 read with clause 6.15 of reg. 33(10) read with reg.
41(5)(a)(i) & (iii), 41(2)(i)(a) table ‘A’ sr.no.4 Reg.37(7)(i) & Reg.41(4) table 18
sr.no.2 of DCPR 2034.
42. Fire Man Lift :-
The Architect has proposed 4 nos. of fire man lifts on each floor having
size 2.40 mts. x 1.80 mts. free of FSI at mid landing of each staircase of
residential component of rehab slum dweller bldg.no.3 having height 75.03
mts. for as standard requirement of CFO(MCGM) for fire emergency as per reg.
48(9)(B) read with 31 (1) (xviii) of DCPR 2034 as shown on plan pg. C-1357 to
C-1415 and requested to allow the same.
In view of above, the fire man lifts of size as stated above free of FSI at
mid-landing level of each staircase opening within the fire escape staircase
shall be allowed subject to submission of NOC from CFO of MCGM before
granting C.C of building under reference as proposed by Architect.
43. Refuge area and NOC from CFO:- Double Height refuge area:
Reference is requested to para sidelined ‘Z12’ point no. 43 of “Refuge
area and NOC from CFO” as at pg.N-109 are requested to allow the proposed
refuge area upto 4% free of FSI and by counting excess refuge area into rehab
fungible compensatory FSI at 8th,15th & 22nd floor level in Rehab slum
dwellers bldg. no.3 as tabulated above as per modified Reg. 35(2) (xix) & Reg.
44(7) (a) read with 35(4) of amended DCR 1991. & by insisting the NOC from
CFO MCGM before granting further C.C. to the respective building as
requested by the the L.S., submitted to then CEO(SRA) at pg.-09 to N-171 and
then CEO(SRA)’s approval thereon at pg.N-170 may please be seen.
Architect has proposed double height refuge area at 5th,12th & 19th floor
within & partly beyond the building line due to planning constraints with 4%
area free of FSI & the excess area exceeding 4% is counted in rehab fungible
compensatory FSI of building u/ref. as per reg. 48(8)(a)(ii) read with reg. 31(1)
(xix) of DCPR 2034. The refuge area at 5th floor is having double height i.e. 5.80
mts. height due to excess height of adjoining service area proposed for services
of commercial component below and also 12 th & 19th floor is having double
height i.e. 5.80 mts. height due to planning constraints. The Architect vide his
letter as at pg. C-1421 to C-1429 has requested to allow the same.
The Architect has requested to allow the refuge areas as proposed with
additional height subject to submission of NOC from CFO, MCGM before
further CC to the building under reference.
The details of refuge area required & provided for Rehab Slum dweller
Building no.3 are tabulated as below:
Refuge Refuge Area in. sq.mtr. Remarks

Sr. Building Details of Floor &
No. No. Building Level 4% Reqd. Prop. Excess
in. mtr.
Rehab slum th
dweller bldg. 5 floor 165.85 442.17 276.32
Rehab no.3 comprising Excess area is
slum of 3 level 12th floor 239.68 275.83 36.16 Counted into
1 dweller basement + rehab fungible
bldg no. 3 ground + 1st to compensatory
22th upper floors 19th floor 113.64 236.42 122.78 FSI
having height
75.03 mtr.
double height refuge area at 5th, 12th & 19th floor partly within the building line &
partly beyond having maximum height i.e. 5.80 mts. due to excess height due to
‘Z7’ planning constraints as explained above for residential component in the

building upto 4% area free of FSI & the excess area exceeding 4% counted in FSI
under clause 6.17 of DCR 33(10) read with reg. 48(8)(a)(ii) read with reg. 31(1)
(xix) of DCPR 2034. Subject to submission of NOC from CFO, MCGM before
further C.C. to the building under reference.
44. Part terrace :-

The Architect has proposed part terrace open to sky at top most storey,
at 22nd floor accessible through the common staircase & lift free of FSI as per
reg. 31(2) (iv) for of DCPR 2034 as shown on plan at pg. C-1357 to C-1419 &
45. Pocket Terraces:-
Reference is requested to para sidelined ‘Z6’ point no. 37 of “Travels
Distance” as at pg.N-95 approval are requested to allow 26 nos. of pocket
terraces at 1st , 2nd, 3rd & 4th floor due to provision of shops, D.G. set & toilets
below not accessible through common staircase at rehab slum dwellers bldg.
no.3 by counting its area in rehab compensatory fungible FSI & 7 nos. of
pocket terraces at 1st floor level for covering of ramp & stilt at ground floor from
rain etc. sloped of a gradient of 1:5 not accessible through common staircase at
renewal (tenants) bldg. no.2 free of FSI and to allow part terrace open to sky at
18th (pt) top most storey accessible through common passage & staircase in
Renewal (Tenants) bldg. no.02 by counting it free of FSI as per reg. 35(3) (iv) of
DCR 1991 amended upto date read with MCGM circular u/no.
CHE/22276/DP/GEN dtd. 30.1.2012 as requested by the L. Surveyor,
Now, Architect has proposed total 13 nos. of pocket terraces at 4 th & 6th
floor due to provision of shops and refuge area not accessible through common
staircase at rehab slum dwellers bldg. no.3 by counting its area in rehab
compensatory fungible FSI as per reg. 31(2)(iv) of DCPR 2034 as shown on plan
at pg.C-1357 to C-1415.
The table showing part/pocket terrace in various areas it details are as tabulated under:-
Sr.no. Bldg. no.3 Floors No. of Pocket Terrace Remarks
1 Rehab slum dweller At 4th floor 9 nos. All pocket terrace are
2 bldg. no.3 At 6th floor 4 nos. counted in rehab fungible
compensatory FSI
From the above, table it is seen that pocket terraces created at 4 th & 6th
floor are due to provision of shops and refuge area, planning constraints & are
not accessible through common passage by counting its area in rehab fungible
compensatory FSI without charging premium as per reg. 31(2)(iv) read with
31(3) of DCPR 2034 as shown on plan at pg.C-1357 to C-1415 & thus, The
said pocket terrace are proposed with slop of a gradient of 1:5 and requested to
allow the same.
proposed 13 nos. of pocket terraces as tabulated above due to provision of
shops, refuge area and planning constraints and are not accessible through
‘Z8’
common staircase at Rehab Slum dwellers Building no.3 by counting its area
in rehab compensatory fungible FSI without charging premium under clause
6.17 of reg. 33(10) read with reg. 31(2)(iv) read with 31(3) of DCPR 2034. The
said pocket terraces are proposed with slop of a gradient of 1:5 and as
46. Existing Amenity :-
The Architect has proposed 15 nos. of existing amenity i.e. 10 nos. of amenities
by counting its area in rehab component as per Scrutiny sheet from Tahsildar–1
03/01/2022 as at pg.- C-1815 without counting the same in FSI as per clause 8.1,
8.2 & 8.3 of reg.33(10) of DCPR 2034 and proposed 5 nos. of Temple area by counting
its area in Sale FSI as per reg.33(10) of DCPR 2034 as shown on plan at pg. C-1357
to C-1419 and requested to allow the same.
The details of the existing amenity proposed are as tabulated below: -
Building no. Floor Amenity Req. C. A. Prop. C. A.
Rehab Slum dwellers 4th flr. MCGM (424) 23.62 20.90
Building No. 3 MCGM (423) 25.75 20.90
Toilet (507) --- 27.88
Rehab Commercial Ground flr. Temple (138) 90.00 90.00
Building. no.1 Ground flr. Temple (125) 109.74 109.74
1st flr. Temple (2 nos.) 277 & 278 90.00 90.00
Rehab Commercial Ground flr. Police Beat(93) 20.90 20.90
Building no.4 Ground flr. Temple (285) 14.82 14.82
3rd floor Arvind nagar mitra mandal (412) 14.49 14.49
Arvind nagar krida mandal (561) 20.70 20.70
Arvind nagar seva sang (562) 12.25 12.25
Markendye pandmashali santha (173) 17.96 17.96
Arvind nagar krida mandal (560) 13.83 13.83
MCGM store (563) Area not 15.00
mentioned
The Architect vide his letter at pg. C-1421 to C-1429 has stated that they have
proposed the 15 amenities like MCGM office, Budha Mahasangh etc. out of which 10
nos. are counted free of FSI & counting its area in rehab component and 5 temples
are counted in sale FSI due to planning constraints like odd & narrow shape of plot,
major plot affected by setback of D.P. Road, large number of slum dwellers to be
accommodated etc. & has thus requested to allow the same.
In view of above Hon’ble CEO(SRA)’s Orders are requested to allow the 15

nos. of existing amenities as tabulated above at upper floors due to planning
constraints out of which 10 nos. are counted free of FSI by counting its area in
‘Z9’ rehab component and proposed 5 nos. of Temple area by counting its area in
Sale FSI as per reg.33(10) of DCPR 2034 as per Scrutiny sheet from Tahsildar–1
03/01/2022 under clause 6.17 read with clause 8.1, 8.2 & 8.3 of reg.33(10) of
DCPR 2034 as tabulated above as requested by the Architect.
47. Double height of 5th floor for services:
The Architect has proposed the double height of 5.80 mts. at 5 th floor for
providing services like U.G.tank, Fire fighting tanks, lift machine room etc. for the
rehab commercial shops & R/C tenements below of Rehab slum dwellers bldg.
no.3 due to planning constraints as per the requirement of MEP Consultant as
shown on plan at pg. C-1357 to C-1419 & requested to allow the same.
In view of above, Hon’ble CEO(SRA)’s orders are requested to allow the
service floor having double height of 5.80 mts. at 5 th floor for providing services
‘Z10’ like U.G.tank, Fire fighting tanks, lift machine room etc. for the rehab commercial
shops & R/C tenements below Rehab slum dwellers bldg. no.3 under clause 6.17
of reg. 33(10) read with 31(1) (xx), 37(32) of DCPR 2034 as requested by the
Architect subject to CFO, MCGM NOC.
48. Space for Security /Watchman Cabin:

The Architect has proposed space for 3 nos. watchman / Security
booths at entry & exist point on access road from S.S.Amrutwar Marg at west
side & existing 6.00 mts. wide Road & 12.20 mtr. R.L. at north & east side for
rehab slum dwellers building no.3 for total plot area more than 4000 sq.mts.
with carpet area of each booth not more than 3.00 sq.mts. free of FSI as per
reg. 31(1)(ii) read with 42(ii)(g) of DCPR 2034 as shown on plan at pg. C-1357
to C-1419 & requested to allow the same.
In view of above, Hon’ble CEO(SRA)’s approval is requested to allow the
‘Z11’ proposed space for 3 nos. watchman / Security booths at entry & exist point
access road S.S.Amrutwar Marg at west side & existing 6.00mtr. wide Road &
12.20 mtr. R.L. at north & east side for rehab slum dwellers building no.3 for
total plot area more than 4000 sq.mts. with carpet area of each booth not more
than 3.00 sq.mts. free of FSI as per reg. 31(1)(ii) read with 42(ii)(g) of DCPR
2034 subject to CFO NOC as requested by the Architect.
49. Exemption of Staircase Room, Passage, Lift, Lift Lobby Area,

O.H.W.T. & LMR of Rehab Commercial Building no.1, 4 & Rehab
Slum dwellers Building no.3 :-
The Architect has proposed Rehab commercial bldg.no.1 comprising of
Gr.+ 2nd (pt) upper floors having height 13.35 mtr., High rise Rehab slum
dweller bldg. no. 3 wing ‘A’ to ‘D’ comprising of 3 level basement + ground + 1 st
to 22nd upper floors having 75.03 mtr. and Rehab Commercial Building no.4
comprising of Basement(pt) +Gr. to 3rd (pt) having height 17.35 mtr.
The Architect has proposed 4 nos. of staircase each having flight width of
1.50 mts. upto 5th upper floor service floor & 4 nos. of passenger lifts alongwith 2
nos. of goods lifts upto 4th upper habitable floor for the commercial component of
rehab slum dwellers building no.3 free of FSI. The Architect has proposed 2 nos.
of lift machine rooms for lift serving the Rehab Commercial Shop & R/C.
tenements proposed from ground to 4 th upper floor at Rehab Slum dwellers
Building no.3 free of FSI as shown on plan at pg. C-1357 to C-1419 & requested
to allow the same.
The Architect has proposed 4 nos. of staircase each having flight width 2.00
mts. alongwith 2 nos. of lift each for wing ‘A’ to ‘D’ from ground to 22 nd floor +
terrace floor free of FSI as shown on plan at pg.C-1357 to C-1419 & requested to
allow the same. The Architect has proposed 4 nos. of lift machine rooms for lift
serving the Rehab residential component free of FSI as shown on plan at pg.C-
1357 to C-1419. The Architect has proposed 1 no. of fireman lift alongwith smoke
check lobby for each wing ‘A’ to ‘D’ from ground to 22 nd floor + terrace floor at
Rehab Slum dwellers Building no.3 free of FSI as shown on plan at pg. C-1357 to
C-1419 & requested to allow the same.
The Architect has also proposed hydraulic lifts (i.e. lift machine roomless
lifts) for Rehab Commercial building no.1 & 4 free of FSI as shown on plans at pg.
C-1357 to C-1419 & requested to allow the same.
The details of various staircases & lifts for the Rehab Residential
Component & Rehab Commercial Component of Rehab Slum dwellers Building
no.3, Rehab Commercial Building no.1 & 4 are as tabulated below :-
Sr. Bldg. no. / Floors Staircase (each Lift & Lobbies Remark
no. Wings wing) (each wing)
For For For resi. For Comm.
resi. Comm.
1 Rehab Basement (pt) +Gr. --- 01 nos. --- 01 nos.
Commercial to 2nd(pt)
bldg. no.1 (‘A’ &
‘B’ )
2 Rehab Basement(pt) +Gr. --- 01 nos. --- 01 nos.
Commercial to 3rd (pt) Free of FSI
bldg. no.4
3 Rehab Slum 3 level basement + 01 nos. 02 nos.& 01 01 nos.
Dwellers bldg. Gr.+ 1st to 22nd + 01 nos. no. of (upto 4th floor).
no.3 (‘A’ to ‘D’) Terrace (upto 5th Fireman lift 01 nos. goods
floors.) lifts for two
wings each
(A,B & C,D)
The Architect has requested to allow exemptions of following areas from
FSI computations for Rehab Commercial Building no.1, 4 & Rehab Slum
dwellers Building no.3 as per the provision of DCPR-2043 and MCGM circular
issued dtd.30/01/2020 copy as at pg. C-1633 to C-1635.
i. To allow staircase, lifts, lift lobbies areas & passages on all habitable floors
free of FSI without charging premium for Rehab Commercial Building no.1,
4 & Rehab Slum dwellers Building no.3.
ii. To allow the staircase lift, lift lobbies areas at basement floor free of FSI
without charging premium of Rehab Commercial Building no.1, 4 & Rehab
Slum dwellers Building no.3.
iii. To allow the staircase from top most floor to terrace Rehab Commercial
Building no.1, 4 & Rehab Slum dwellers Building no.3 free of FSI without
charging premium.
iv. To allow lift machine rooms top most floor to terrace floor free of FSI without
charging premium for Rehab Commercial Building no.1, 4 & Rehab Slum
dwellers Building no.3.
vi. To allow the area of passages free of FSI to the extent of two times of
staircase and lift lobby as per MCGM circular dtd. 30/01/2020.
In view of above, Hon’ble CEO (SRA)’s approval is requested to allow the
exemptions of all the above mentioned areas in sr. no. i to vi for Rehab
Commercial Building no.1, 4 & Rehab Slum dwellers Building no.3 free of
‘Z12’
FSI and to allow common passage in front of rehab units to be counted into
rehab component as per reg. 31(1)(iii), (iv) & (xxv) read with clause 6.14 of
reg. 33(10) of DCPR 2034 and as per MCGM policy circular under
no.CHE/DP/110/GEN dt. 30/01/2020 as requested by Architect.
 Planning of Renewal tenements bldg. no.2 under reg. no. (33/7):

In this case, the L.S. has obtained the sanction of then CEO(SRA) for the
LOI u/no.SRA/ENG/2937/GS/ML/LOI dtd. 05/07/2018 to the renewal
scheme under Reg.33(7) of DCR 1991 for 101 nos. tenement vide copy at pg.C-
1293 to C-1312). In the said LOI L.S. has proposed the Renewal tenements
bldg. no 2. consisting wing A and wing B comprising 2 level basement + Gr.
(pt.)/stilt(pt.) + 1st to 17th + 18th upper floor having height 59.55 mtr.
Now, Architect has stated that he has proposed renewal tenements bldg.
no.2 consisting wing A and wing B comprising 2 level basement + Gr.(pt)+
stilt(pt) + 1st to 18th floor having ht. 69.05 mtr. with minor changes/
modifications in the internal planning as per modified clause no.10 of reg. 33(7)
of DCPR 2034 of UDD notification u/no.
TPB-4320/107/CR-72/2020(Part-I)/UD-11 dtd. 8.7.2021.
The details of the changes/ modifications proposed are as under:-

1. One meter room of each wing is now proposed instead of one meter
room for the entire building as proposed earlier at ground/stilt floor.
2. The Area & the location of the temple within the stilt is now changed.
3. The society office is now proposed at ground/stilt level instead of at
1st floor level as proposed earlier.
4. The height of stilt level is now proposed to 16.85 mts. instead of
earlier proposed stilt of 7.20 mts. height for provision of rotary system
of car parking.
5. The built over-arch under the stilt is now proposed for vehicular
movement within the plot.
6. The location & size of D.G.Set is changed.
7. 1 no. of staircase each per wing is now proposed for pedestrian access
to entrance lobby at higher level from 9.00 mts. driveway at west side.
8. The basement line is now reduced at east side at 3.00 mts. from the
6.00 mts. wide existing road instead of 1.50 mts. as proposed earlier.
9. 3 nos. of watchman cabin are now proposed at North & East side.
10. Additional ventilation shafts for basement are proposed.
11. Entrance lobby area is now reduced.
12. The alignment of basement ramp is changed.
13. The shape of fitness centre at 1st floor is changed.
14. The area & size of hall at 1st floor is changed.
15. The orientation of staircase, lifts & their sizes along with lift lobbies
at typical floor are changed.
16. The location & size of ED are changed.
17. FD is now proposed.
18. Area of refuge area is minorly reduced.
19. Enclosed balconies proposed earlier are now deleted.
20. 18th floor (entire floor) is proposed with sale t/s. instead of earlier
18th(pt) floor.
21. Height of building is increase to 69.05 mts. instead of earlier 59.55
mts. as proposed.
22. Service utility room is proposed above society office as shown on plan
at page C-1357 to C-1419.
50. Tenements statements:-
Floor Wing ‘A’ Wing ‘B’ Fitness Hall Society Sale Total
centre office Resi.
Ground --- --- --- --- 01 --- 01
1st 03 --- 01 01 --- --- 05
2nd 03 03 --- --- --- --- 06
3rd 03 03 --- --- --- --- 06
4th 03 03 --- --- --- --- 06
5th 03 03 --- --- --- --- 06
6th 03 03 --- --- --- --- 06
7th 03 03 --- --- --- --- 06
8th 03 03 --- --- --- --- 06
9th 03 03 --- --- --- --- 06
10th 03 03 --- --- --- --- 06
11th 03 03 --- --- --- --- 06
12th 03 03 --- --- --- --- 06
13th 03 03 --- --- --- --- 06
14th 03 03 --- --- --- --- 06
15th 03 03 --- --- --- --- 06
16th 03 03 --- --- --- --- 06
17th 03 03 --- --- --- --- 06
18th --- 02 --- --- --- 04 02
Total 51 50 01 01 01 04 108
51. Basement: -
Reference is requested to para sidelined ‘S’ point no. 20 of “Basement for
renewal (tenement) bldg. no.2, rehab slum dwellers bldg. no. 3, rehab
commercial bldg.no.1 & 4 ” as at pg.71.
1) To allow 2 level basements with basement 1 with floor height of 3.00 mtr.
and basement 2 having 2 level car parking arrangement by provision of pit
parking having total max. height 5.50 mts. (inclusive of pit of depth 2.50
mts.) & 3.00 mts. for driveway for renewal (tenement) bldg. no.2 & has
provided 3 level basement for rehab bldg. no.3 with basement 1 with floor
height 4.20 mtr., basement 2 having height 2.90 mts. & basement 3 with
floor height 4.20 mtr for provision of 2 level stack parking & other building
utilities like U.G. tank. Pump room etc. along with the standard building
utilities as requested by SEAC and has provided single basement for rehab
bldg. no.1 & 4 with floor height 3.00 mtr. for other building utilities like
U.G. tank. Pump room etc. along with the standard building utilities as
required by S.E.A.C. for Environmental Clearance free of FSI. All the
basements for renewal (tenement) bldg. no.2 & rehab slum dwellers bldg.
no.3 are contiguous & is separated by single RCC wall in between them.
The L. Surveyor has proposed the basement within the building line having
minimum plinth height of 0.15 mts. & the basement beyond building line is
proposed flushed with the ground level for Rehab buildings no.3 and
Renewal building no.2 for vehicular movement with AA class RCC slab as
per the provisions of clause no. 6.24 of Appendix IV of Regulation no. 33
(10) read with 64 (b) of D.C Regulation 1991, amended up to date subject
to submission of registered undertaking against its misuse.
2) To allow maximum open space deficiency of 100% for basement of rehab
building no.3 touching the compound wall at north side and on south side
touching the basement of renewal (tenement) bldg. no.2 and for rehab slum
dweller rehab / commercial building no.1 & 100% for the basement of
Rehab renewal (tenants) bldg.no.2 & rehab commercial building no.1 i.e.
touching to basement of rehab building no.3 at north side & sale building
no.5 at south side. Also to allow the open space of 3.00 mtr. abutting
24.40mtr. road Shriram Amrutwar Marg & 6.00 mts. wide existing road at
east side for basement of rehab commercial bldg no.1 & 4 & renewal
tenants building no.2 due to planning constraint under reg. 6.24 of
Appendix-IV of DCR 33(10).
3) To allow minimum 0.15 mts. height plinth for rehab building no.1, 3 & 4
and renewal tenants building no.2 instead of min 0.30 mts. and 0.60 mts.
min. required as per DCR 1991 due to planning constraints under reg. 6.24
of Appendix – IV of DCR 33(10).
4) To allow maximum height of basement of 5.80 mts. for renewal (tenement)
bldg. no.2 & rehab slum dweller bldg. no. 3 & rehab commercial bldg. no.1
& 4 under clause 6.24 of Appendix – IV of DCR 33(10) read with reg.38(9)(ii)
of DCR 1991 amended upto date as requested by L. Surveyor.
5) To allow access to basement through 6.00 mts. wide two-way ramp for
rehab slum dweller bldg. no.3 and renewal (tenement) bldg. no.2 touching
to compound wall at zero open space and through staircase only for rehab
building no.1 &4 as requested by L. Surveyor.
6) To allow basement of the renewal no. 2 and rehab bldg. no. 3 extended
below the 9.00 mtr. wide internal pathway touching to the buildings.,
Submitted to the then Hon’ble CEO (SRA) at pg.N-7 to N-171 and

approval for the same thereon at pg.C-170 may please be seen.
In this case, Architect has now continued to propose 2 level basement

beyond the building line in the renewal tenement bldg. no.2 having height of 1 st
basement 3.00 mtr. & 2nd basement 3.00 mtr. free of FSI at minimum increased
open space 3.00 mtr. from plot boundary on east side, instead of earlier
proposed 1.50 mts. The Architect has continued to proposed the sanctioned
zero open space from rehab comm. bldg. no.1 on west side, Rehab slum dweller
bldg. no.3 on north side & sale bldg. no.5 on south side as shown on plan at
pg.C-1357 to C-1419.
The Architect has now increase the maximum depth of basement to 8.23
mts. instead of earlier approved 5.85 mts. The area of basement is now reduced
to 2931.10 sq.mts. from earlier 3541.46 sq.mts. due to decrease in area
abutting 6.00 mts. wide existing road. The plinth height of the basement is now
varying from 0.60 mts. to 1.93 mts. due to variation in the road levels at west &
east side instead of earlier approved 0.40 mts. within building line & 0.15 mts.
beyond instead of permissible 1.20 mts. as per DCPR-2034. The Architect has
requested to allow the additional plinth height as ventilation is continued to
proposed through mechanically ventilated system.
The alignment of the 6.00 mts. wide 2 way ramp for vehicular access to
the basement within the approved basement line is changed. The services for
the building like STP, U.G.Tank etc. are continued with change location. There
are no other changes in the basement of the proposed renewal tenement bldg.
no.2.
In view of above, Hon’ble CEO(SRA)’s orders are requested
1. To allow two level basement within building line & partly beyond building
line at east & west side, basement 1 & 2 each having floor height 3.00
mts. with basement to having 2 level car parking arrangement by
provision of pit parking having total height 10.73 mts. (inclusive of pit of
depth of 2.50 mts.) having depth of basement of maximum 8.23 mts.
having plinth height varying from 0.60 mts. to 1.93 mts. due to
topography of plot accessible through 6.00 mts. wide 2 way drive way
touching to compound wall at zero open space for provision of car
‘Z13’ parking arrangement & other building utilities like U.G.Tank pump room,
Fire fliting tank, OWC, STP, Rain water harvesting tank etc. with
maximum open space deficiency of 100% touching compound wall at
north (rehab building no.3), south (sale building no.5) & west (rehab
building no.1) & 3.00 mts. open space at east side under clause 6.17 of
reg. 33(10) read with 37(7)(i)&(ii), 37(7)(iv) (b)(c) & (e), reg.37(7)(v)(a)(d) &
(e) & 31(1) (v) of DCPR 2034.
52. Part stilt at Renewal tenement bldg. no.2:-

Architect has continued to propose part stilt at ground floor with minor
changes in the Renewal tenement bldg. no. 2 with increased height of stilt of
16.85 mts. to accommodate rotary parking system. instead of earlier proposed
height 7.20 mtr. for stack parking arrangement under clause 6.17 of reg. 33(10)
read with reg. 31(1) (vi) & reg. 37(30) of DCPR 2034.
Architect vide his letter at pg. C-1421 to C-1429 has stated that they
have proposed the additional height of max. 16.85 mts. for stilt free of FSI
which is proposed for rotary parking system as per the requirement of MEP
consultant & has requested to allow the same.
In view of above, Hon’ble CEO (SRA)’s orders are requested to allow

proposed part stilt with additional height of 16.85 mts. with rotary parking
system as explained above under clause 6.17 of DCPR 33(10) read with reg.
‘Z14’
31(1) (vi) & 37(30) of DCPR 2034 as requested by Architect subject to
submission of MEP consultant drawing for proposed rotary parking &
registered undertaking from the developer against misuse of part stilt or rotary
parking before asking further CC to the Renewal Tenements bldg. no.2.
53. Additional staircase for pedestrian access:

Architect has proposed additional staircase having width 1.50 mtr. for
pedestrian access of each wing for entrance lobby at higher level from 9.00 mts.
wide driveway at west side at ground floor of bldg. under reference as shown on
plan at pg.C-1357 to C-1419 free of FSI & requested to allow the same.

The Architect has proposed 03 nos. of watchman /Security cabin at
entrance to building under reference, i.e. 02 nos. facing to the 6.00 mtr. wide
existing road at east side & 01 no. facing 9.00 mtr. wide internal pathway at
north side having area adm. 3.00 sq.mtr each free of FSI for the building for
total plot area more than 4000 sq.mts. as shown on plan at pg C-1357 to C-
1419 & requested to allow the same.
The space for watchman cabin/security control room free of FSI is
permissible as per the provisions reg. 31(1)(ii) read with 42(ii)(g) of DCPR 2034.
In view of above, Hon’ble CEO (SRA)’s approval is requested to allow
‘Z15’ the proposed area of 03 nos. watchman /security cabin for total plot area more
than 4000 sq.mts. as explain above 31(1)(ii) read with 42(ii)(g) of DCPR 2034
as proposed by Architect.
55. Meter & Panel Room:-

The Architect has proposed electric meter /panel room having BUA
‘
16.44 sq.mtr. each for wing ‘A’ & ‘B’ instead of earlier approved 15.13 sq.mtr.
with maximum height 7.20 mtr. due to the maintain the entrance lobby level
by counting its area in sale FSI at ground floor in renewal tenement bldg. no.2
as shown in the plan as at pg. C-1357 & C-1401 as per reg. 37(11) of DCPR
2034 as requested by the Architect.
proposed electric meter /panel room having BUA 16.44 sq.mtr. each for wing
‘Z16’ ‘A’ & ‘B’ instead of earlier approved 15.13 sq.mtr. with maximum height 7.20
mtr. to maintain the entrance lobby level the by counting its area in sale FSI at
ground floor in renewal tenement bldg. no.2 under clause 6.17 read with reg.
37(11) of DCPR 2034 as requested by Architect.
56. Space for D.G. Set:-

The Architect has proposed Space for D.G. set within building line
having area adm. 27.43 sq.mts. with height 16.85 mts. within the building line
at ground floor of Renewal tenant building no.2 adjoining 9.00 mts. wide
driveway free of FSI as per reg. 31(1) (xxix) of DCPR 2034 as shown on plan at
pg. C- 1357 to C- 1419 & requested to allow the same subject to NOC from
C.F.O. MCGM before granting further C.C. to the building u/ref.& undertaking
for not to misuse the same.
57. Temple :-
In this case, Architect has continued to propose temple within building
line having reduces BUA 12.39 sq.mtr. with height of 7.20 mts. at changed
location instead of earlier approved having BUA 26.50 sq.mtr. having height
7.20 mts. in the Renewal tenements bldg. no. 2 by counting its area in sale FSI
as shown in the plan as at page C-1357 to C-1419 subject to NOC from Police
Department & CFO of MCGM before C.C. to temple structure to the respective
building.
The proposed temple within building line having reduced BUA 12.39
sq.mtr. with height of 7.20 mtr. at changed location by counting its area in sale
FSI instead of earlier approved temple having BUA 26.50 sq.mts. & height 7.20
mts. as shown by Architect shall be allowed subject to NOC from Police
Department & CFO of MCGM before C.C. to temple structure to the respective
building.
58. Entrance Lobby:-

In the instant case, Architect has proposed entrance lobby in Renewal
tenements bldg. no. 2 having minorly reduced area having height 7.20 mts. by
counting it free of FSI instead of earlier approved entrance lobby having height
7.20 mts. free of FSI as per reg. 35 (2) (xxi) of amended DCR 1991 as seen plan
as at pg. C-1357 to C-1419.
59. Society Office:-

The Architect has proposed society office having area upto 20.00 sq.mtr.
by counting its area free of FSI at ground floor of building under ref. instead of
earlier approved at 1st floor as per reg. 31(1) (vii) read with 37 (9) of DCPR
2034, as shown on plan at pg. C-1357 to C-1419 and requested to allow the
same subject to registered u/t. for not misusing the same or for not creating
any third party interest in what-so-ever manner before OCC to the bldg. under
reference.
60. Service utility room:-
The Architect has proposed two service utility rooms having each carpet
area 15.30 sq.mts. with each height 3.51 mts. above the temple & society office
at ground floor to match up the 1 st floor building slab at 16.85 mts. above and
proposed the same due to adjoining rotary parking system in stilt by counting
its area free of FSI as per reg. 31(1)(xxxii) as shown on plan at pg.C-1357 to C-
1419 & requested to allow the same.
proposed two service utility rooms having each carpet area 15.30 sq.mts. with
each height 3.51 mts. above the temple & society office at ground floor to
match up the 1st floor building slab at 16.85 mts. above and proposed the
‘Z17’
same in renewal tenement bldg. no.2 due to adjoining rotary parking system in
stilt by counting its area free of FSI as per reg. 31(1)(xxxii) read with clause
6.17 of reg. 33(10) of DCPR 2034 as requested by Architect.
61. Fire & Electric Ducts :-
The Architect has proposed electrical & fire ducts for various electric
utilities /services & wet riser at all floors having increased size 0.60 mts. x
1.20 mtr. = 0.72 sq.mtr. by counting its area in sale FSI as per reg.31(1)(xxxi)
of DCPR 2034 each at changed location instead of earlier proposed E.D. having
area 0.60 sq.mtr. in rehab FSI, for the building u/ref. as shown on the plans
as at pg. C-1357 to C-1419 the same are proposed as a standard building
services amenity required as per CFO MCGM and requested to allow the same.
In view of above, the electrical, L.V. & firefighting ducts with services
slabs 0.60 mts. depth for carrying utilities/services through these ducts having
sizes as mentioned above as per the requirement of MEP consultant by
counting its area in sale FSI for all floors in Rehab renewal tenant building no.2
as per reg. 31(1)(xxxi) of DCPR 2034 subject to NOC from CFO(MCGM) before
further C.C. to building under reference as requested by Architect

62. Hall (Amenity):-
Architect has proposed hall having BUA 84.73 sq.mtr. instead of earlier
approved area 59.91 sq.mtr. with height 2.90 mtr. for the in-general use of the
society Shree Mangalmurti CHS Ltd. at 1 st floor in the building u/ref. by
counting its area in sale FSI.
Further, Architect vide his representation as at pg. C-1421 to C- 1429

has stated that as per request of his client has proposed the common hall as
amenity to the tenements of the building u/ref. as per the request of Shree
Mangalmurti CHS Ltd. As per reg. 34(3.2) table-C, Sr.no.43 of DCPR 2034, the
hall is required to be proposed with separate wing with separate access.
However, Architect has proposed the hall (Amenity) at 1 st floor in the building
u/ref. by counting its area in sale FSI with common access as shown on plan
vide at pg. C-1361, and stated that the same shall not be misused for
commercial use. A registered undertaking from the developer and concerned
society before OCC to the building u/ref.
In view of above, Hon’ble CEO(SRA)’s orders are requested to continue to

allow the proposed hall having increase BUA 84.73 sq.mtr. with height 2.90
mtr. accessible through 1.50 mts. wide staircase of the building for the in-
‘Z18’
general use of the society Shree Mangalmurti CHS Ltd. at 1 st floor in the
building u/ref. by counting its area in sale FSI as per the request of Shree
Mangalmurti CHS Ltd. under clause 6.17 of reg. 33(10) read with reg. 34(3.2)
table C Sr.no.43 of DCPR 2034 subject to NOC from CFO MCGM / A registered
undertaking from the developer and concerned society for not to misuse the
same for commercial use before OCC to the building u/ref. as requested by the
Architect.
63. Fitness centre :-

The Architect has continued to propose fitness center at first floor having
BUA area adm. 187.34 sq.mts. instead of required 200.00 sq.mts. (i.e.
maximum of 200.00 sq.mts. or 2% of total BUA of the building) by counting its
area free of FSI instead of earlier approved BUA 172.92 sq.mtr. free of FSI As
per reg.37(28) read with 31(1) xvii of DCPR 2034 as shown on plan as at Pg. C-
1357 to C-1419 and requested to allow the fitness center area as proposed.
In view of above Hon’ble CEO (SRA)’s approval is requested to continue to

allow proposed fitness center at first floor having increased BUA area adm.
‘Z19’ 187.34 sq.mts free of FSI instead of earlier approved BUA 172.92 sq.mtr. free of
FSI As per reg.37(28) read with 31(1) xvii of DCPR 2034, subject to registered
u/t. from developer that he shall hand over the same to the society member free
of cost.
64. Service Duct /Service slab abutting to sanitary blocks (Bath & W.C.
for renewal t/s.):-
Architect has proposed the service duct with service slab abutting
sanitary blocks (Toilet) having maximum depth upto 2.00 mts. at all levels for
down take of plumbing services free of FSI as per as per the Reg. 31 (1) (xxiii) of
DCPR 2034 in renewal tenement bldg.no.2 as shown in plan at pg. C-1357 to
C-1419 and requested to allow the same.
The details of service duct/ service slab is as below table:-
Sr. Wing & floors Size & Area of service duct/slab Remarks
No. & nos. of duct at each floor.
1. High rise renewal tenement bldg. no. 2 i) 2.60 x 1.46 x 4 External
wing ‘A’ & ‘B’ comprising of 2 level ii) 1.47 x 2.13 x 4 duct
basement + ground (pt) + stilt (pt) + 1 st to
18th upper floors having height 69.05 iii)2.71 x 1.38 x 2 Internal
mtr. iv) 1.47 x 2.13 x 2 duct

service duct with service slab abutting sanitary blocks (Toilet) as explain above
‘Z20’
free of FSI in renewal tenement bldg. no.2 as per the Reg. 31 (1) (xxiii) of DCPR
2034.
65. Refuge area and NOC from CFO:-

Architect has proposed refuge area at every alternate mid-landing level of
staircase from 2nd, 4th, 6th, 8th, 10th,12th,14th,16th & 18th floor by way of R.C.C.
cantilever projections having width of 3.55 mts. and an area of 20.55 sq.mts, of
rehab tenant bldg. no.2 as shown on plan as at pg.C-1357 to C-1419 per level
free of FSI instead of earlier approved refuge area of mid-landing level at
8th ,10th 12th 14th ,16th & 18th as per reg. 48(8)(b) read with reg. 31(1) (xix) of
DCPR 2034
The Architect has stated that the levels of refuge floor are changed
increase of stilt height at ground floor due to proposed rotary parking.
The cantilevered refuge areas at mid-landing level as proposed having
width of 3.55 mts. & area 20.55 sq.mts. as explained above free of FSI as per
reg. 48(8)(b) read with reg. 31(1) (xix) of DCPR 2034 shall be allowed subject to
submission of NOC from CFO, MCGM before CC to the building under
reference.
In view of above the refuge area at 2nd, 4th, 6th, 8th, 10th,12th,14th,16th &
18th upto 4.25% free of FSI & the area in excess of 4% is counted towards sale
FSI at Sale Building 5 as per reg. 48(8)(a)(iii) read with reg. 31(1) (xix) of DCPR
2034 subject to CFO NOC of MCGM before C.C. to building u/ref. as requested
by Architect.
66. Open Spaces deficiency :-

Reference is requested to para sidelined ‘Z10’ point no. 41 of “Open
spaces” as at pg.108 are requested to condone the deficiency created in open
spaces maximum up to 58.14% for the Rehab (Commercial) building no.1 &
High rise Renewal (Tenement)building no.2, having open spaces deficiency
maximum up to 65.38%, Rehab building no.3 having open spaces deficiency
maximum up to 35.83%, Rehab (commercial) building no.4 having maximum
open space deficiency of 50.00% & maximum open space deficiency of 100%
for basement of rehab building no.1, 3, 4 & renewal tenement building no.2
due to planning constraints as explained above without charging premium as
per clause 6.24 of Appendix IV of Reg. 33(10) read with clause 6.11, 6.15, 6.22
& 6.23 of Appendix – IV of Reg. 33(10) read with Reg. 29(1)(a & f), 29(5) Table
10 (A) (6) amended DCR 1991 subject to NOC from CFO of MCGM before
further CC to the building under reference as requested by L. Surveyor,
Now, the Architect has proposed renewal (tenement) bldg.no.2
comprising of 2 level basement + Gr.(pt)/stilt (pt ) + 1 st to 18th upper floors
additional height 69.05 mtr. instead of earlier proposed height of 59.55 mts.
for 18th (pt) floor.
Renewal tenements bldg. no.2 height of building 69.50 mts.
Building
Front open space = 3.00 mts. (Reg.41(4) table 18 sr.no.2)
Side & rear marginal O.S. = 6.00 mts. (Reg.41(5)(a)(iii))
J.O.S. of rehab slum dwellers building no. 3 = 15.00 mts.(9.00 + 6.00)

(Reg.41(5)(a)(iii))
J.O.S. of rehab Comm. building no. 1 = 12.00 mts. (3.00 + 9.00)

(Reg.41(5)(a)(iii))


Rehab commercial building no.1
(depth = 3.45 mts.) = 3.00 mts.(1.50 + 1.50) (Reg.37(7)
(i))
rehab slum dwellers building no. 3
(depth = 12.43 mts.) = 4.50 mts.(3.00 + 1.50) (Reg.37(7)
(i))
Side D/W O.S. req.(m) O.S. prop. Defi. Defi. (%) Remarks
L/V (m)
Basement
North -- 4.50 0.00 4.50 100% J.O.S. between rehab
(3.00 + 1.50) slum dwellers building no.3
& renewal tenement
bldg.no.2.
East -- 1.50 More than Nil Nil From existing 6.00 mtr.
1.50 wide road.
South -- 4.50 More than Nil Nil J.O.S. between of renewal
(1.50 +3.00) 4.50 tenant bldg.no.2 & sale
bldg. no.5
West -- 3.00 0.00 3.00 100% J.O.S. between basement of
(1.50 +1.50) renewal tenant bldg.no.2 &
commercial bldg. no.1.
Building
North D/W 15.00 9.23 5.77 38.46% J.O.S. between renewal
(6.00 + 9.00) tenant bldg.no.2 & rehab
slum dwellers building
no.3.
South D/W 6.00 +9.00 9.00 6.00 40.00% J.O.S. between renewal
=15.00 tenant bldg.no.2. & sale
bldg. no.5.
East L/V 6.00 More than Nil Nil From existing 6.00 mtr.
6.00 wide road.
West L/V 3.00 + 6.00 = 7.00 2.00 22.22 J.O.S. between renewal
9.00 tenant bldg.no.2 &
commercial bldg. no.1.
It is seen from the above table that the open space deficiency generated
for the renewal tenements bldg. no.2 is maximum upto 100 % for the basement
& varying from 22.22 % to 40.00 % for building above.
space which is as under:-
i) Small & odd size of plot to rehabilitate the slum dwellers.
ii) Large number of slum dwellers,
iii) major plot affected by road set-back.
iv) 12.20 mts. wide proposed road through the plot.
v) Amenity plot u/reg.14 of DCPR 2034
vi) Large number of rehab commercial shops etc.
vii) Availability of only approximate 52% of buildable plot for rehab & sale
buildings.
Therefore, Architect has requested to condone the deficiency in the open
spaces for the renewal tenant bldg. no.2 as stated above as per provisions
Reg.41(5)(a)(i) & (iii), 41(2)(i)(a) table ‘A’ sr.no.4 Reg.37(7)(i) & Reg.41(4) table 18
sr.no.2 read with 6.17 of 33(10) of DCPR 2034.
provisions of Reg. No. 6(b) of DCPR 2034, is verified as per given provisions in
In this context Architect has submitted his certificate vide pg. C-1667
i) Health Safety:
ii) Fire Safety:
The compliance of Fire safety measures is incorporated as a
condition of approval of amended plans being sought. The completion
certificates from CFO shall be insisted before grant of OCC.
Architect has not submitted the revised structural design, drawing &
calculations as per amended plans. The same will be insisted before granting
plinth C.C. A condition to that effect will be incorporated in amended plans
approval letter. Further structural stability certificate from the appointed
License Structural Engineer shall be insisted after completion of the building.
Structural stability of the building is thus taken care.
iv) Public Safety:
The Architect vide his representation at pg. C-1421 to C-1429 as stated
that the basement of renewal tenant building no.2 is touching at north side to
basement of rehab slum dwellers building no. 3 & at west side to basement of
rehab commercial bldg. no. 1 at zero open space due to planning constraints
like large area of plot is affected by road setback, large number of slum
dwellers to be accommodated plot for AOS to be carved out to be handed over
to MCGM, provision of layout R.G. on mother earth etc. as such the deficiency
for the basement is maximum 100% required as per DCPR 2034 & he has
requested to allow the same. The open space deficiency generated maximum
upto 100% for basement & maximum upto 65.38% for building above is
condone is earlier vide para sideline ‘Z10’ of earlier LOI report by then Hon’ble
CEO(SRA)’s as stated above.
In view of above, Hon’ble CEO (SRA)’s orders are requested to continue to

condone the open space deficiency of the renewal tenements bldg. no.2 to the
extent of 100% for basement as stated above & maximum upto 65.38 % for
‘Z21’
building above by charging premium @ 2.5% of ASR under clause 6.17 of reg.
33(10) read with reg.41(5)(a)(i) & (iii), 41(2)(i)(a) table ‘A’ sr.no.4 Reg.37(7)(i) &
Reg.41(4) table 18 sr.no.2 of DCPR 2034 subject to NOC from CFO of MCGM
before further CC to the building under reference.
67. Parking requirement :-

Reference is requested to para sidelined ‘V’ point no. 23 of “Parking
requirement Rehab (Commercial) bldg. no.1, High rise Renewal (tenement)
bldg. no.2, High rise Rehab slum dweller bldg. no.3 & Rehab(commercial)
bldg.no.4” as at pg.112 were requested to 79 nos. of parking proposed against
required 79 nos. parking in Renewal (Tenement) bldg. no.02, by allowing its
area free of FSI as per Reg. 36 table 15 read with modified Reg. 35(2)(vi)of
amended DCR 1991 subject to NOC from E.E.(T & C)of MCGM before further
C.C. to the bldg. under reference submitted to then CEO(SRA) vide at pg.C-09
to C-171 and then CEO(SRA)’s approval thereon at pg.C-171 may please be
seen.
Now, the Architect has proposed the parking spaces required for the
renewal tenements bldg. no.2 are tabulated as follows:
Renewal tenements bldg. no.2
Carpet Nos. of Parking required Required Parking required
area flat as per Reg. 44 Parking/
DCPR Table 21 Flat
under 33(10) of Resi. Comm.
DCPR -2034
Tenement 105 1 parking for 1 105 105 Nil
with tenements
carpet
area
exceeding
70sq.mt.
Renew
al T/S Total 105 nos. -- 105 105 – (a) Nil
10% parking for guest as per reg. 44 table 21 read with 10.50
notification u/no. TPB-4321/CR-12/2021/UD-11 dtd. Say - 11 nos. (b)
21/12/2021 (@10 %
Total (a + b) = 116 nos.
Total required parking 116 nos.
Total proposed parking 116 nos. (x)
Hall & (84.73) + 1 parking for 6.47 nos. 6.47 nos. say 6 nos.
temple (12.39) = every 15 sq.mtr.
97.12
sq.mtr.
10% parking for guest as per reg. 44 table 21 read with 02 nos.
notification u/no. TPB-4321/CR-12/2021/UD-11 dtd.
21/12/2021
Total 8 nos. (y)
(x + y) 124
nos. car parking spaces required against 124 nos. at basement level 1 & 2 and
stilt in renewal tenements bldg. no.2 as shown on plan at pg.C-1357 to C-1419
free of FSI & requested to allow the same instead of earlier approved 79 nos. of
parking free of FSI. Further, the Architect has proposed total 124 nos. (instead
of earlier approved 79 nos. of parking) by way of 06 level of rotary parking
arrangement at stilt, 1st basement with 21 nos. of single parking & 2 level
basement with 2 level stack parking by way of pit in renewal (tenements) bldg.
no.2 due to planning constraints & requested to allow the same.
The Architect vide his letter at pg. C-1421 to C-1429 has stated that due
to planning constraints and odd shape of plot, large nos. of slum dwellers,
major portion of plot affected by D.P. road etc. of renewal tenements bldg. no.2
it is not possible to provide regular parking & thus they have proposed parking
partly stack & rotary parking and request to allow the same free of FSI as
shown on plan pg. C-1357 to C-1419. As there is no specific provision to allow
stack parking / rotary parking arrangement in DCPR 2034.
In view of above, Hon’ble CEO(SRA)’s orders are requested

1. To allow 124 nos. of parking against required 124 nos. free of FSI (instead
of earlier approved 79 nos. of parking) by way of 06 level of rotary parking
arrangement at stilt, 1st basement with 21 nos. of single parking & 2 level
basement with 2 level stack parking by way of pit in renewal (tenements)
bldg. no.2 due to planning constraints under clause 6.17 of reg. 33(10) of
DCPR 2034 read with Reg. 44 DCPR Table 21 under 33(10) of DCPR -2034
‘Z22’
subject to NOC from EE (T&C) of MCGM.
2. To allow mechanical parking system i.e. 2 level stack parking / rotary
parking arrangement due to planning constraints under clause 6.17 of reg.
33(10) of DCPR 2034 as requested by the Architect.
68. Part Terrace:-

The Architect has now proposed reduced open to sky part terrace at
18th floor level accessible through common passage & staircase of wing ‘A’
free of FSI instead of earlier approved larger open to sky part terrace free of
FSI generated due to planning constraints as shown on plan at pg.C-1357
to C-1419 & has requested to allow the same.
The Architect vide his letter at pg. C-1421 to C-1429 has stated that
the part terrace is generated due to planning constraints & is accessible
through common passage & lift / staircase & thus cannot be misused & as
such he has requested to allow the same.
In view of above, Hon’ble CEO(SRA)’s approval is requested to
continue to allow open to sky part terrace at 18 th floor level accessible
‘Z23’ through common passage & staircase of wing ‘A’ free of FSI generated due to
planning constraints as the same cannot be misused under clause 31(2)(iv)
of DCPR 2034 as requested by the Architect.
69. Exemption of Staircase, passage, Lift, Lift Lobby, lift machine room
Area and O.H.W.T. etc. From FSI Computation for High rise
Renewal tenement bldg. no. 2 :-
Reference is requested to para sidelined ‘Z15’ point no. 46 of “Exemption
of Staircase Room, Passage, Lift, Lift Lobby Area and O.H.W.T. etc. From FSI
Computation For Rehab Commercial bldg. no.1 & 4 and High rise Renewal
(tenement) bldg. no. 2 & Rehab slum dwellers bldg. no.3:” as at pg.117
approval is requested to allow the exemptions of all the above mentioned areas
in sr. no. 1 to 5 of Rehab Commercial bldg. no.1 & 4 and High rise renewal
(tenement) bldg. no. 2 & Rehab slum dweller bldg. no.3 free of FSI without
charging premium and to allow common passage in front of rehab units to be
counted into rehab component as per modified Reg. 35(2) (iii) & (iv) read with
clauses 6.21 & 6.23 of Appendix- IV of Reg. 33(10) of amended DCR-1991,
Now, Architect has continued to propose the High rise Renewal
tenements bldg. no. 2 comprising of 2 level basement + ground (pt)/stilt (pt) +
1st to 18th upper floors having height 69.05 mtr. instead of earlier approved upto
18th (pt) floor having height 59.55 mts. with minor modification as shown on
plan as at pg. C-1357 to C-1419 and has requested to continue the then
CEO(SRA)’s approval.
The details of various staircase / lift & lift lobbies proposed for the
rehab / renewal buildings in the layout are as under: -
Sr. Building Floor no. Wing Number of Width of Nos. Remarks
No. staircase Staircase of
flight in Lifts
mts.
1. Renewal 2 level basement ‘A’ & 01 no. each 1.50 mts. 02 01 staircase
tenants + ground (pt) + ‘B’ (floor plate less nos. & 02 lifts for
bldg.no.2 stilt (pt)+ 1st to than 500 each each wing
18th upper floors sq.mts. as per Free of FSI.
having ht. 69.05 reg.48(5)(A)(a)
mtr. (ii)) of DCPR
2034
In view of above, Hon’ble CEO(SRA)’s approval is requested to allow to
continue the then CEO(SRA)’s approval for exemption of Staircase, passage,
Lift, Lift Lobby, lift machine room Area and O.H.W.T. etc. from FSI
Computation for point 1 to 5 for High rise Renewal tenement bldg. no. 2 as per
‘Z24’
Reg. 31(1)(iii), (iv) & (xxv) read with clause 6.14 of reg. 33(10) of DCPR 2034 and
as per MCGM policy circular dtd. 30/01/2020 with the Special permission of
Hon’ble Commissioner/ Hon’ble CEO (SRA).
 Planning & permissibility of Sale Bldg. no.05:-
167.90 mtr.
wing ‘C’ comprising of 03 level basements + Gr. to 1 st (Retail) + 2nd to 5th

167.90 mtr.
Accessible through 24.40 mtr. wide S.S. Amrutwar Marg at west side and
30.50 mtr. wide G.K. Marg at south side i.e. more than 13.00 mtrs. as per reg.
19(2) (subject to NOC from CFO & HRC, MCGM) instead of earlier High rise
residential sale building no.05 comprising of Three Wings (i.e. Wing ‘A’, ‘B’ & ‘C’
with two level basements + Ground(pt) / stilt(pt)+ four level podiums + 5 th to
57th (pt) upper floor having height 163.15 mtrs.
As seen from above the Architect has proposed mixed users at wing ‘A’ to
‘D’ as under: -
70. Retail :-
The Architect has proposed Gr. + 1st floor for shops / stores for
conducting retail business / trade at all wings in sale building no.5 accessible
from 24.40 mts. wide S.S. Amrutwar Marg at west side & 30.50 mts. wide
G.K.Kadam Marg at south side. The retail shops are limited to less than 50% of
floor space of principal residential user as per sr.no.27 table C of reg. 34(3.2) of
DCPR 2034.
71. Business office & services establishment :-
The Architect has proposed commercial business offices from 2 nd to 7th
upper floor of wing ‘C’ & ‘D’ accessible from 24.40 mts. wide S.S. Amrutwar
Marg at west side. The Business Offices are limited to less than 50% of floor
space of principal residential user as per sr.no.25 table C of reg.34 (3.2) of
DCPR 2034.
72. Home Occupation Offices :-
The Architect has proposed Home Occupation Offices at 7 th upper floor of
wing ‘A’ & ‘B’ of sale bldg. no.5 as shown on plan at pg.C-1357 to C-1419 by
counting its area in sale FSI accessible from 24.40 mts. wide S.S. Amrutwar
Marg at west side as directed by his clients as stated by him vide his letter at
pg.C-1421 to C-1429. The Architect has requested to allow the same as per
sr.no. 76 of reg.2 (IV) of DCPR 2034. The same is elaborated at point no.3.1
above Hon’ble CEO(SRA)’s orders are requested therein.
73. Service apartments:-
The Architect has proposed total 444 nos. i.e. 10 nos. of service
apartment per floor by counting its area in sale FSI as shown on plan at pg.C-
1357 to C-1419 as directed by his clients as stated by him vide his letter at pg.
C-1421 to C-1429 accessible by 2 nos. of 2.00 mts. wide separate staircases &
5 nos. of lifts above the commercial business office of wing ‘D’ from 10 th to 47th
upper floor & requested to allow the same. The same is elaborated at point
no.3.2 above Hon’ble CEO(SRA)’s orders are requested therein.
74. The t/s. statement for sale bldg. no. 05 as per proposed plans is as
under:-
Floor Residential Commercial
Wing-A Wing-B Wing-C Wing-D Wing-A to D
Basement- -- -- -- -- --
1, 2 & 3
Gr. -- -- -- -- 03
1st 01
2nd to 5th -- -- -- -- 04
podium (1 X 4 floor)
6th 01
7th 06
8th Amenity -- -- -- -- --
9th Service -- -- -- -- --
10th (Refuge) 03 03 03 10 --
11th 04 04 04 12
12th 04 04 04 12
13th 04 04 04 12
14th 04 04 04 12
15th 04 04 04 12
16th 04 04 04 12
17th (Refuge) 03 03 03 10
18th 04 04 04 12
19th 04 04 04 12
20th 04 04 04 12
21st 04 04 04 12
22nd 04 04 04 12
23rd 04 04 04 12
th
24 (Refuge) 03 03 03 10
25th 04 04 04 12
26th 04 04 04 12
27th 04 04 04 12
28th 04 04 04 12
29th 04 04 04 12
30th 04 04 04 12
31st(Refuge) 03 03 03 10
32nd 04 04 04 12
33rd 04 04 04 12
34th 04 04 04 12
35th 04 04 04 12
36th 04 04 04 12
37th 04 04 04 12
th
38 (Refuge) 03 03 03 10
39th 04 04 04 12
40th 04 04 04 12
41st 04 04 04 12
42nd 04 04 04 12
43rd 04 04 04 12
44th 04 04 04 12
45th (Refuge) 03 03 03 10
46th 04 04 04 12
47th 01 04 04 12
Total 143 146 146 444 15
75. Means of Access: -

The Architect has proposed High rise sale building no.05 wing ‘A’ to ‘D’
having height of the building upto last slab level is 167.90 mtrs. accessible
through minimum 24.40 mts. wide S.S. Amrutwar Marg & 30.50 mts. wide
G.K.Kadam Marg as per Reg. 19 (2) and (3) subject to CFO NOC and HRC NOC
respectively.
76. Basement for Sale Bldg. no.5 :-

In this case, Architect has proposed 3 level basement partly within
building and partly beyond building line on all sides having total depth 15.70
mts. i.e. 1st basement having height is 5.10 mtr. & below soffit 5.00 mtr. clear
height for double stack car parking and 2 nd & 3rd basements having clear height
4.20 mtr. for double stack car parking free of FSI with more than 3.00 mtr.
open space on north side adjoining plot for Rehab Commercial Building no.1 &
Renewal Tenements bldg. no.2, min.1.00 mts. open space at west side abutting
24.40 mtr wide S.S.Amrutwar Marg & min. Zero open space at south/east side
abutting 30.50 mtr. wide G.K.Marg respectively & 0.50 mts. open space at east
side abutting existing 6.00 mtr. wide road for provision of essential building
services and utilities like U.G. tank, firefighting tank, pump room, RWH, STP,
OWC etc as per reg. 37(7) (iv) (b) to (e) read with reg. 31(1) (v) of DCPR 2034 as
shown on plan at pg. C-1357 to C-1419 at the sale bldg. no.5 & requested to
allow the same.
The Architect vide his representation at pg. C-1421 to C-1429 has stated
that due to planning constraints like odd & narrow shape of plot, major road
set-back affecting the plot & large no. of slum dweller etc. at ground floor so it
is not possible to make provision of basic services such as U.G. tank, Fire tank,
Domestic tank, pump room, OWC, & flush tank etc. in the marginal open
spaces. Thus, he has provided these services in the basement portion of the
Sale bldg. no.5 by claiming the area of the basement free of FSI and requested
to allow the same.
The details of the basement proposed is tabulated as under:-

Description Details Remarks
Plinth Height 0.90 mts. above av. G.L As per reg. 37(7)(v)(a) of DCPR
2034.
Proposed Maximum total depth of 15.70 As per reg. 37(7) (ii) of DCPR
Height of mtr. i.e. 1st basement ht. is 2034.
Basement 5.10 mtr. for proposed double
stack parking and 2nd & 3rd
basement ht. is 4.20 mtr. for
double stack parking purpose.
Depth of 15.70 mtrs. As per reg. 37(7)(i) of DCPR 2034.
basement
2 nos. of staircase with flight As per Reg. 37(7) (v)(d) & (e) &
width 2.00 mts. with lift core of 4 (16) (ii) of DCPR 2034.
Prop. access to lifts each for wing A to C and 5
basement lifts for wing D, for vehicular
movement through proposed 6.00
mtr. wide 2-way ramp.
Light & Provided ventilation Shaft / cut As per Reg.37(7)(iii) of DCPR
ventilation outs at top slab of basement 2034.
Car parking, Fire fighting tank, Reg. 37(7) (iv) (b) to (e) of
RWH, BMS Domestic flush tank, DCPR 2034.
User
pump room, space for STP & OWC
etc.
From the above table, it is observed the total height of the basement is
15.70 mts. for double stack parking & other utilities & services required for
sale bldg. no.5 as per reg. 37(7)(ii) of DCPR 2034. The Architect vide his letter
as at pg. C-1421 to C-1429 has stated that they have proposed building
services / utilities like U.G. tank, fire fighting tank, BMS etc. with greater
depth at the basement due to planning constrains like odd shape of plot, large
number of slum dwellers, major plot affected by road set-back etc.
Further, there is no specific provision to allow stack parking arrangement
as per DCPR 2034. The Architect has stated that due to planning constraints
as mentioned earlier they have proposed 3 level stack parking arrangement to
accommodate required car parking spaces in 3 level basement. Thus,
Architect has requested to allow the same subject to NOC from CFO, E.E. (T &
C) & E.E. (M & E) of MCGM.
In view of above, Hon’ble CEO (SRA)’s orders are requested to proposed 3

level basement partly within the building line & partly beyond building line
having total height 15.70 mts. i.e. 1 st basement having height is 5.10.mtr. and
2nd & 3rd basement having clear height 4.20 mtr. for double stack car parking
free of FSI with more than 3.00 mtr. open space on north side adjoining plot
‘Z25’ for Rehab Commercial Building no.1 & Renewal Tenements bldg. no.2,
min.1.00 mts. open space at west side abutting S.S.Amrutwar Marg & min.
Zero open space at south/east side abutting 30.50 mtr. wide G.K.Marg
respectively & 0.50 mts. open space at east side abutting existing 6.00 mt.wide
road for provision of essential building services and utilities like U.G. tank, fire
fighting tank, pump room, RWH, STP & OWC & 2 level stack parking
arrangement for Sale Building no.5 for provision of essential building services
and utilities like U.G. tank, firefighting tank, pump room, RWH, STP & OWC
due to planning constraints under clause 6.17 of reg. 33(10) read with reg.
37(7)(i),(ii),(iii) & (iv) (b)(c) & (e) & (v)(d), (e), Reg. (16)(ii) & reg. 31(1)(v) of DCPR
2034 as requested by the Architect subject to NOC from CFO, E.E. (T & C) &
E.E.(M & E) of MCGM.
77. Organic Waste Controller:-
The Architect has proposed organic waste controller (OWC) at 1st level
basement having area adm. 101.52 sq.mt. free of FSI in Sale bldg. no. 05 as
standard requirement for environmental clearance as shown on plan as at pg.
C-1357 to C-1419 as per provision under clause 6.17 of reg. 33(10) read with
reg. 37(7)(iv)(b) and 31(1)(xiv) of DCPR 2034 and requested to approve the
same. The Architect has stated that this is essential building services /building
utility & is proposed as standard requirements for environmental clearance.
There is no specific provision of OWC in DCPR-2034.
The Architect vide his letter as at pg. C-1421 to C-1429 has stated that due
to planning constraints like odd & narrow shape of plots, large number of slum
dwellers, major plot affected by road set-back etc. he has proposed the various
building services / utilities like U.G. tank, firefighting tank OWC etc. with greater
depth at the basement free of FSI & requested to allow the same.
In view of above, Hon’ble CEO(SRA)’s orders are requested to allow organic

waste controller (OWC) at 1st level basement due to planning constraints as
‘Z26’ mentioned above having area adm. 101.52 sq.mt. free of FSI in Sale bldg. no. 05
as standard requirement for environmental clearance under clause 6.17 of reg.
33(10) read with reg. 37(7)(iv)(b) and 31(1)(xiv) of DCPR 2034 as requested by
Architect.
78. Rain water harvesting (RWH):-

In this case, Architect has proposed Rain water harvesting (RWH) at 1st
level basement free of FSI as shown on plan as at pg. C-1357 to C-1419 under
clause 6.17 of reg. 33(10) read with reg. 62, reg.37(7)(iv)(b) & (e) & 31(1)(xxxv).
due to planning constraints like odd & narrow shape of plots, large number of
slum dwellers, major plot affected by road set-back etc. he has proposed the
various building services / utilities like U.G. tank, firefighting tank, OWC, Rain
Water Harvesting Tank etc. with greater depth at the basement free of FSI &
In view of above Hon’ble CEO(SRA)’s orders are requested to allow Rain

water harvesting (RWH) at 1st level basement due to planning constraints as
mentioned above free of FSI under clause 6.17 of reg. 33(10) read with reg. 62,
‘Z27’
Reg.37(7)(iv)(b) & (e) & 31(1)(xxxv) of DCPR 2034 as requested by Architect
subject to certification of concerned competent MEP consultant that the RWH
tank is constructed as per specifications.
79. Entrance lobby :-

The Architect has proposed entrance lobbies as tabulated below :-
Wing User Floor Size Area Height Remarks
Mts. Sq.mts. Mts.
‘A’ to ‘C’ Residential Ground 6.65 x 37.24 8.85 (double Purely Resi.
5.60 ht.) wings
‘D’ Residential Ground 5.65 x 36.90 8.40 (double Mixed Users
(Service Apt.) 6.53 ht.)
Comm. Ground 3.20 x 20.90 8.40 (double Mixed Users
(Business 6.53 ht.)
Office)
From the above table it is seen that the Architect has proposed entrance
lobbies 1 each for wing ‘A’ to ‘C’ & 1 no. of entrance lobby each for mixed user
of services apartment & commercial business office at wing ‘D’ of sale building
no.5 of various sizes & areas as tabulated above having height 8.40 mts for
building u/ref. free of FSI as shown on plan at pg. C-1357 to C-1419 &
As per reg. 31(1) (xxi) of DCPR-2034 “Entrance lobbies in stilted portion,
height not exceeding 7.20 mts. or height equivalent to two floor or height of stilt
whichever is more.”
In this case as seen from the section at pg. C-1419 of sale building u/ref.
the floor to floor height for sale business offices at wing ‘D’ & adjoining parking
podiums at wing ‘A’ to ‘C’ from Ground to 7 th upper floor is 4.20 mts. each. The
height of the services apartments at wing ‘D’ & sale residential units at wing ‘A’
to ‘C’ above is 3.20 mts. The height equivalent 2 floor i.e. 3.20 mts. x 2.00 mts.
= 6.40 mts., thus, the maximum height of entrance lobbies permissible as per
reg.31(1)(xxi) of DCPR 2034 is maximum 7.20 mts.
The Architect vide his representation at pg.C-1421 to C-1429 has stated

that the height of sale business office at wing ‘D’ & adjoining car parking
podiums at wing ‘A’ to ‘C’ from ground to 7 th upper floors is 4.20 mts., thus, the
height equivalent 2 floor i.e. 4.20 mts. x 2.00 mts. = 8.40 mts., is permissible
as per reg.31(1)(xxi) of DCPR 2034 & he has requested to allow the same.
Further, the Architect has stated that they have proposed the adjoining parking
floors having height 4.20 mts. to accommodate stack parking arrangement &
also, to maintain the slab at single level from planning point of view. As such he
has requested to allow 1 entrance lobby each for wing ‘A’ to ‘D’ of sale building
u/ref. of uniform height of 8.40 mts.
In view of above Hon’ble CEO(SRA)’s orders are requested to allow

entrance lobbies 1 each for wing ‘A’ to ‘C’ & 1 no. of entrance lobby each for
mixed user of services apartment & sale business office at wing ‘D’ of sale
‘Z28’ building no.5 of various sizes & areas as tabulated above having 8.40 mts.
height for building u/ref. free of FSI as requested by the Architect under clause
6.17 of reg. 33(10) read with reg. 31(1) (xxi) of DCPR-2034.
A condition not to misuse the same is incorporated in the draft LOI.

80. Electric meter /panel room:-
The Architect has proposed Electric meter /panel rooms as tabulated below :-
Wing User Floor Size Area Height
Mts. Sq.mts. Mts.
‘A’ 7.75 x 6.45 49.99
‘B’ Residential Ground 3.30 x 2.00 6.60 4.20
‘C’ 3.30 x 2.00 6.60
‘D’ Residential Ground 3.30 x 2.00 6.60 4.20
(Service Apt.) and
Commercial
(Business Office)
From the above table it is seen that the Architect has proposed Electric
meter /panel rooms 1 each for wing ‘A’ to ‘C’ & 1 no. of Electric meter /panel
room each for mixed user of services apartment & commercial business office at
wing ‘D’ of sale building no.5 of various sizes & areas as tabulated above having
height 4.20 mts. for building u/ref. free of FSI as shown on plan as at pg. C-
1357 to C-1419 as per reg. 31(1)(xxxii) of DCPR-2034. There is no specific
provision in DCPR 2034 to allow panel room, however the same are proposed as
per standard fire safety requirement of CFO MCGM. Further, Architect has
requested to allow the same subject to CFO MCGM NOC & Electric Supply
Company NOC before grating plinth C.C. to the buildings u/ref.
In view of above, Hon’ble CEO(SRA)’s order is requested to allow electric

meter/fire panel rooms of sizes, areas & heights proposed at ground floor as
tabulated above by counting its area free of FSI at sale bldg. no.5 as per
‘Z29’
standard fire requirement of CFO MCGM under clause 6.17 of reg. 33(10) read
with reg. 31(1)(xxxii) of DCPR 2034 as requested by the Architect subject to
CFO MCGM NOC & Electric Supply Company NOC before grating plinth C.C.
to the buildings u/ref.

The Architect has proposed space for 4 nos. watchman / Security booths
at each entry & exist point from Ganpatrao Kadam Marg at south side, 9.00
mtr. wide internal drive way at north side & existing 6.00 mtr. Municipal Road
at east side & S.S. Amrutmwar marg at west side for sale building no.5 for total
plot area more than 4000 sq.mts. with carpet area of each booth not more than
3.00 sq.mts. free of FSI as per reg. 31(1)(ii) read with 42(ii)(g) of DCPR 2034 as
proposed space for 4 nos. watchman / Security booths on at each entry & exist
point Ganpatrao Kadam Marg at south side, 9.00 mtr. wide internal drive way
‘Z30’
side & existing 6.00 mtr. wide Municipal Road at east side & S.S. Amrutwar
Marg at west side for sale building no.5 for total plot area more than 4000
sq.mts. with carpet area of each booth not more than 3.00 sq.mts. free of FSI
as per reg. 31(1)(ii) read with 42(ii)(g) of DCPR 2034 subject to CFO NOC as
82. D. G. Set room :-

The Architect has proposed 2 nos. of D.G. set rooms within building line
i.e. one D.G. Set having size 7.75 x 6.45 mts. having area adm. 49.99 sq.mts.
within building line for residential on north side for Sale bldg. no.5 & another
one having size 14.30 x 5.35 having area adm. 76.50 sq.mts. D.G.Set space
open to sky at east side adjoining 6.00 mts. wide existing road free of FSI as
per reg. 31(1) (xxix) of DCPR 2034 as shown on plan at pg. C- 1457 to C- 1419
& requested to allow the same.
83. Entrance Canopy :-

The Architect has proposed Entrance Canopy at west & south side of
Sale Building no.5 with level difference of 0.30 mtr. in relation of the level of
the adjoining floor with clear height more than 2.20 mts. parallel to the main
building at 0.00 mtr. open space instead of minimum 1.50 mts. of clear
distance required from plot boundary on west side & with more than 1.50 mtr.
open space proposed at east side and outer edge of canopy required as per reg.
37(19) free of FSI as per reg. 31(1)(ix) read with 37 (19) of DCPR 2034 as
Entrance Canopy at east & west side of Sale Building no.5 with level difference
of 0.30 mts. in relation of the level of the adjoining floor with clear height more
‘Z31
than 2.20 mts. parallel to the main building at 1.20 mtr. open space instead of
’
minimum 1.50 mts. of clear distance required from plot boundary on west side
& with more than 1.50 mtr. open space proposed at east side & outer edge of
canopy required as per reg. 37(19) free of FSI under clause 6.17 of reg. 33(10)
read with reg. 31(1)(ix), 37 (19) of DCPR 2034 as requested by the Architect.
84. Restaurant: -
The Architect has proposed Restaurant at Ground & 1 st upper floor with
internal staircase having flight width 1.20 mtrs. at wing ‘A’ & ‘B’ directly
accessible through 24.40 mts. S.S. Amrutwar Marg in sale building no.5 as per
sr.no.26 table ‘C’ sub-reg.3.2 of reg. 34 of DCPR 2034 as shown on plan as at
pg. C-1357 to C-1419 by counting its area at base level which is useable with
minimum heard room of 1.80 mts. in sale FSI and the remaining area of
internal staircase at base level and the area of internal staircase at upper level
of the proposed Gr. + 1st floor restaurant of the building free of FSI by
charging 100% premium at ASR as per MCGM circular u/no.
CHE/DP110/Gen dtd.30/1/2020 as a pg.C-1849. This ancillary use is limited
to 50% floor space of principal use. Thus, Architect has requested allow the
same subject to NOC from CFO, MCGM.
85. Parking requirement of sale bldg. no.5 :-
The parking spaces required for the sale bldg. no.5 are tabulated as follows:
Carpet area Number Parking Required Parking Proposed
required as per Parking/Flat
Reg. 44 DCPR
Table 21 under
33(10) of DCPR
Sale -2034
bldg. Upto 45.00 336 (Services 1 parking for 8 42 42
no.5 Sq.mt. apt.) tenements
45.00 to 108 (Services 1 parking for 4 27 27
60.00 apt.) tenements
60.00 to 435 1 parking for 2 218 218
90.00 (Residential tenements
flats)
Total 882 nos. -- 287 287 (a)
10% parking for guest as per reg. 44 table 21 read with 28.70 say 29 nos.
notification u/no. TPB-4321/CR-12/2021/UD-11 dtd. (b)
21/12/2021
Total (a + b) = 316 nos. (c)
Carpet area Commercial 1 parking for 800/40 = 20 20 nos.
Offices every 40.00
sq.mts. for floor 4928.41 62.00 nos.
area upto 800.00 (5728.41-
sq.mts. & 1 800) / 80 =
parking for every 61.62
80.00 sq.mts. nos.
beyond say 62.00
Total 82.00 82.00 (d)

10% parking for guest or min. 2 as per reg. 44 table 21. 8.20 nos. say 8.00
(e) (82.00 x 10%)
Total (d+e) = 90 nos. (f)
(c+f )= 406 nos. (A)
406 x 50% =203
nos.(B)
Total parking Required (A+B) =609 nos.
Total parking proposed 609 nos.
Architect has proposed total 609 nos. car parking spaces at 1, 2 & 3 level
basements by way of 2 level stack parking and from 1st part & 2nd (part) to 7th
(
part) podium level by way of 2 level stack parking as against required 609 car
parking spaces for the sale bldg. no.5 due to the planning constraints as odd &
narrow shape of plot etc. as shown on plan as at pg. C-1357 to C-1419. Thus,
he has requested to allow the same.
The parking are provided as per reg. 44 table 21 read with reg.
31(1)(vi) of DCPR 2034 and the Architect has requested to allow the same free of
FSI.
Also, the Architect has proposed by way of 2 level stack parking
arrangement at podium of sale bldg. no. 5 for provision of parking free of FSI as
shown on plan pg. C-1357 to C-1419 and requested to allow the same subject
to NOC from E.E.(T&C) MCGM and EE(M&E) MCGM before granting plinth CC
to the building u/ref.
In view of above, Hon’ble CEO(SRA)’s approval is requested to allow total

609 nos. car parking spaces at 1, 2 & 3 level basements by way of 2 level stack
parking and from 1st part & 2nd (part) to 7th (part) podium level by way of 2 level
‘Z32’ stack car parking as against required 609 car parking spaces for the sale bldg.
no.5 due to the planning constraints as odd & narrow shape of plot etc. as per
reg. 44 table 21 read with reg. 31(1)(v) of DCPR 2034 subject to NOC from E.E.
(T&C) MCGM and E.E.(M&E) MCGM before granting plinth CC to the building
u/r.
86. Podium:-
The Architect has proposed upto 7 th level podium (i.e. 1st part & 2nd (part)
to 7th (part)) within building line accessible through 6.00 mtr. wide two-way
ramp having last podium level of 30.30 mts. i.e. within 32.00 mts. with total
height of podium upto the roof slab of 34.50 mtr. for 2 level stack car parking
provision & scooter parking provision in sale bldg. no.05 along with driver
toilet of size 2.2 sq.mts at each podium level except 1 st & 7th and service utility
room each of 10.00 sq.mts (1 room per 50 tenements) at 2 nd floor to 6th floor
free of FSI as per reg. 31(1)(xxvi) & (xxxii) read with 37(31) of DCPR -2034 as
shown on plan at pg. C-1357 to C-1419 and requested to allow the same
subject to NOC from E.E. (T & C.) of MCGM before further C.C. to building
u/ref.
The open space proposed min. 3.00 mtr. between plot boundary / edge of
road of all side. The proposed car parking spaces are accessible through 6.00
mtr. wide two-way ramp with height of each podium of 4.20 mts. for the sale
bldg. no.5 as per reg. 31(1)(xxvi) read with 37(31) of DCPR -2034.
In view of above, Hon’ble CEO(SRA)’s approval is requested to allow 7th
level podium (i.e. 1st part & 2nd (part) to 7th (part)) within building line accessible
through 6.00 mtr. wide two-way ramp having last podium level of 30.30 mts.
‘Z33 i.e. within 32.00 mts. with total height of podium upto the roof slab of 34.50
’ mtr. for 2 level stack car parking provision and scooter parkings along with
driver toilet of size 2.2 sq.mts at each podium level except 1 st & 7th and service
utility room each of 10.00sq.mts (1 room per 50 tenements) at 2 nd floor to 6th
floor accessible through the 6.00 mtr. two way ramp with each podium having
height of 4.20 mts. with minimum 3.00 mts. open space on all around free of
FSI as per reg. 31(1)(xxvi) & (xxxii), 37(31) of DCPR-2034 subject to NOC from
E.E. (T & C.) of MCGM before further C.C. to building u/ref.
87. Society Office:
The Architect has proposed Society Office as tabulated below: -
Wing User Floor
Nos. of Size Area Height Remarks
Society Mts. Sq.mts. Mts.
Office
‘A’ to Residential Amenity 01 2.87 X 21.20 8.80 Purely
‘C’ floor 6.95, each Residential
(8th Flr.) 1.25X1.00 /
‘D’ Commercial 01 5.81 x 19.99 Commercial
3.44 wings /
Mixed
Users
The Architect vide his letter at pg.C-1421 to C-1429 has stated that as
directed by his clients he has proposed 2 nos. of society office, 1 society office
for residential wing ‘A’ to ‘C’ having carpet area upto adm.21.20 sq.mtr.& 1
society office for commercial wing ‘D’ each having carpet area upto adm.19.99
sq.mtr. as tabulated above with maximum height 8.80 mtr. due to floor height
maintain in sale bldg. no.05 and claiming its area free of FSI under clause 6.17
read with reg. 31(1) (vii) read with 37 (9) of DCPR 2034 as shown on plan at pg.
C-1357 to C-1419 & requested to allow the same.
The developer vide his letter at pg.C-1431 to C-1439 has stated that the
sale building no.5 is a large building with 4 wing with mixed user & thus, they
have proposed 2 society offices for residential & commercial wings for
convenience of the affairs of each society & requested to allow the same subject
to registered u/t. for not misusing the same or for not creating any third party
interest in what-so-ever manner before grating OCC to the buildings u/ref.
In view of above, Hon’ble CEO(SRA)’s orders are requested to allow 02
society offices for residential wing ‘A’ to ‘C’ having carpet area upto adm.21.20
sq.mtr.& commercial wing ‘D’ each having carpet area upto adm.19.99 sq.mtr.
‘Z34’ with maximum height 8.80 mtr. due to floor height maintain in sale bldg.
no.05 and claiming its area free of FSI under clause 6.17 read with reg. 31(1)
(vii) read with 37 (9) of DCPR 2034 subject to registered u/t. from developer for
not misusing the same or for not creating any third party interest in what-so-
ever manner before grating OCC to the buildings u/ref.
88. Toilet for Commercial t/s.:-

The Architect has proposed toilets for commercial t/s. for Gent &
Ladies as tabulated below:
Sr. Bldg. Floor Gents Ladies Remark
No.
1 sale bldg. no.5 Ground As shown on plan All toilets are
1st vide at pg.-C-1357 counted in sale
to C-1419 FSI.
2 2nd to 7th 3 nos. 3 nos.
From the above table, it is seen that the Architect has proposed toilets as
tabulated above in sale bldg. no.5 by counting its area in sale FSI as shown on
plan at pg. C-1357 to C-1415 and has requested to allow the same as per reg.
36 of DCPR 2034.
89. Drivers Sanitary Blocks:-
The Architect has proposed Sanitary block having area not exceeding
2.20 sq.mts. at each parking floor level / podium for used of drivers free of FSI
at shown on plan at pg.C-1357 to C-1419 & requested to allow the same as per
reg. 31(1)(xxvi) of DCPR 2034.
90. Services utility rooms :-
The Architect has proposed service utility room at each podium level free
of FSI totally adm. 180 sq.mts. i.e at 2 nd to 6th podium levels as per reg. 31(1)
(xxxii) of DCPR 2034 as shown on plan at pg.C-1357 to C-1419 & requested to
allow the same.
91. Amenity floor
91.1 Fitness Centre/Gymnasium:-
The Architect has proposed fitness Centre adm.1122.49 sq.mts. i.e. 2%
equivalent to the total BUA of sale building no.5 by counting its area free of
FSI having 8.80 mts. height & partly with 13.00 mts. height for proposed
badminton court for the use of proposed co-operating housing society
including toilet facility at 8th amenity floor as against required 1123.39 sq.mts.
(56169.66 BUA x 2%) as shown on plan at pg.C-1357 to C-1419 & requested
to allow the same. The Architect has proposed fitness center for various sport
facility users like card room, Reading room, Gym, Badminton, Multipurpose
court, SPA, Yoga etc.
As per reg.37(28) fitness centre including toilets facilities shall be
allowed free of FSI equivalent 2% of total BUA of every building distributed as
desired for the use of co-operative housing society. The centre shall used for
fitness centre activities & reading room.
As per sr.no.1(ii)(e)(i) of table 15 of reg.37(2) of DCPR 2034, the

permissible height of sport facility is 8.80 mts. further, the increase height of
the sport facility shall be permissible subject to special permission of the
Commissioner.
the part portion of fitness centre is proposed with additional height of 13.00
mts. for uses of sport facility like badminton court etc.
In view of above, Hon’ble CEO(SRA)’s orders are requested to allow to

fitness Centre adm.1122.49 sq.mts. i.e. 2% equivalent to the total BUA of sale
building no.5 by counting its area free of FSI having 8.80 mts. height & partly
‘Z35 with 13.00 mts. height for the various uses of sport facility for proposed co-
’ operating housing society including toilet facility at 8 th amenity floor as against
required 1123.39 sq.mts. (56169.66 BUA x 2%) at 8 th amenity floor under
clause 6.17 of reg.33(10) read with reg.37(2) table 15 of DCPR 2034 as
91.2 Restaurant, Cafe & Banquet Hall :-

The Architect has proposed Restaurant, Cafe & Banquet Hall within
building line above at 8 th floor i.e. amenity floor of purely commercial wing ‘D’
of sale building no.5 with separate access through 2.00 mts. wide staircase &
lift connecting to 24.40 mts. S.S. Amrutwar Marg by counting its area in sale
FSI as shown on plan at pg. C-1357 to C-1419 & requested to allow the same.
As per sr.no.26 table ‘C’ sub-reg.3.2 & as per sr. no. 43 table ‘C’ sub-
reg.3.2 of reg. 34 of DCPR 2034 the Restaurant, Cafeteria & commercial hall
(banquet hall) at separate wing with separate access are permissible. This
ancillary use is limited to 50% floor space of principal use. Architect has stated
that the NOC from CFO MCGM, NOC from E.E.(T & C) MCGM shall submit
before approval of the plans and a registered undertaking & indemnity bond
from the developer indemnifying CEO(SRA) & his staff against any future
accident / litigations thereof & they shall ensure that they / the person
running the premises shall take necessary precautions for safety of the
occupants.
The condition to that effect is incorporated in the draft LOI.
In view of above Hon’ble CEO(SRA)’s approval is requested to allow

Restaurant, Cafe & Banquet Hall within building line above at 8 th floor i.e.
amenity floor of purely commercial wing ‘D’ of sale building no.5 with separate
‘Z36’
access through 2.00 mts. wide staircase & lift connecting to 24.40 mts. S.S.
Amrutwar Marg by counting its area in sale FSI as per sr.no.26 table ‘C’ sub-
reg.3.2 & as per sr. no. 43 table ‘C’ sub-reg.3.2 of reg. 34 of DCPR 2034
respectively as requested by the Architect subject to the user u/ref. only after
obtaining CFO MCGM, E.E.(T & C) MCGM NOC before approval of the plans &
a registered undertaking & indemnity bond from the developer indemnifying
CEO(SRA) & his staff against any future accident / litigations thereof & they
shall ensure that they / the person running the premises shall take necessary
precautions for safety of the occupants.
91.3 Swimming Pool (Infinity Pool):-

In this case, Architect has proposed open to the sky swimming pool
(Infinity Pool) of 1.15 mts. depth at 8th floor i.e. amenity floor open to sky top
most podium level along with raised deck by counting its area free of FSI as per
Reg. 31(1)(xxii) of DCPR 2034 as shown on plan at pg. C-1357 to C-1419 and
He has also proposed the double slab above the habitable floor below to
ensure avoidance of leakages. The Architect has stated that the swimming pool
is proposed as an additional amenity as per specific request of his clients in
order to improve the sale. He has further stated that the RCC drawing, design
& calculations along with the specification & water proofing details shall be
submitted.
Further, the developer has stated that no Municipal Water shall be used
for the swimming pool. Thus, he has requested to allow the swimming pool free
of FSI.

open to the sky swimming pool (Infinity Pool) of 1.15 mts. depth at 8 th floor
open to sky top most podium level along with raised deck by counting its area
free of FSI as per Reg. 31(1)(xxii) of DCPR 2034 as requested by the Architect
‘Z37 subject to that they shall submit the RCC drawing, design & calculations along
’ with the specification & water proofing details for the swimming pool (Infinity
pool) before asking C.C. for the same and that no Municipal Water shall be
used for filling up the swimming pool & shall indemnify SRA & its officers
against any form of litigation in this matter as regards swimming pool. A
registered under taking to that effect from the developer shall be submitted
before approval of swimming pool plans.
92. Service floor:

The Architect has proposed the service floor at 9 th floor i.e. above 8th floor
podium level having ht. 3.00 mtr. for services of building to facilitate provision of
various utility viz., down take drain pipes, electric cable, telephone cable
storages tanks etc. having building height 167.90 mts. for sale building no.05 by
counting its area free of FSI as per reg. 37(32) read with reg.31(1)(xx) of DCPR
2034 as shown on plan at pg. C-1357 to C-1419.
service floor is proposed due to the exceptional height of sale building no.05 for
various services required to facilitate provision of various utility viz., down take
drain pipes, electric cable, telephone cable storages tanks etc. as well as to
segregate the water distribution system at service floors by counting its area free
of FSI and requested to allow the same subject to NOC from CFO(MCGM) & E.E.
(M & E) MCGM before further C.C. to sale building no.05.
In view of above, Hon’ble CEO(SRA)’s approval is request to allow the
service floor at 9th floor i.e. above 8th floor podium level having ht.3.00 mtr. for
services of building to facilitate provision of various utility viz., down take
‘Z38 drain pipes, electric cable, telephone cable storages tanks etc. having building
’ height 167.90 mtr. for sale building no. 05 by counting its area free of FSI as
per provision reg. 37(32) read with reg.31(1)(xx) of DCPR 2034 as requested by
Architect subject to NOC from CFO(MCGM) & E.E.(M & E) MCGM before
further C.C. to sale bldg. no.5.
93. L.V., Electric & Fire Ducts :-

As per reg. 31(1)(xxxi) of DCPR 2034 electrical/fire duct of clear depth of
not more than 0.45 mts. and not abutting to any habitable room is allowed free
of FSI.
The Architect has proposed 01 no. of electrical, low voltage & fire duct for
each wing carrying of conduits, pipes etc. Electric supply for various utilities
/services like electric cables & LV cables of depth not more than 0.45 mts. free
of FSI as per provision of reg. 31(1)(xxxi) of DCPR 2034 for proposing
firefighting services in the Sale building no.5 as shown on the plans as at pg.
C-1357 to C-1419 and requested to allow the same.
94. Service and ventilation duct abutting to sanitary blocks (Toilet):

The Architect has proposed service and ventilation ducts with service
slabs at all habitable floor to top most floor of various sizes with maximum
width of 1.50 mtr. abutting the toilets in the high rise sale building no. 5 & has
proposed service & ventilation ducts for the toilets blocks free of FSI as per the
Reg. 31 (1) (xxiii) of DCPR 2034, as shown in the plans as at pg. C-1357 to C-
1419.
The Architect vide his representation as at pg. C-1421 to C-1429 has
requested to allow proposed service ducts with service slabs to sanitary blocks
in front of toilet required for carrying plumbing services and for ventilation free
of FSI as per the Reg. 31 (1) (xxiii) of DCPR 2034.
95. Chajja :-
The Architect has proposed chajja at lintel level projecting of maximum
upto 1.20 mtr. beyond the building line all around for weather protection for
sale building no.5 by counting its area free of FSI as per reg. 42(ii)(e)(i) read
with reg.31(1)(xii) of DCPR 2034 as shown on plan at pg. C-1357 to C-1419
without proposing more than 2.50 mts. open space as required.
Further, Architect has stated that he has proposed the chajja at zero
open space at all floors and open space deficiency is already elaborated in the
report and approvals / orders are also requested.

Chajja’s upto maximum width 1.20 mts. beyond the building line all around
‘Z39’ for weather protection for sale building no.5 as stated above by counting its
area free of FSI under clause 6.17 of reg. 33(10) read with reg. 42(ii)(e)(i),
reg.31(1)(xii) of DCPR 2034 as requested by the Architect.
96. Vertical Fins :-

The Architect has proposed vertical fins maximum upto 0.9 mts. as an
elevation features at all floors for the entire sale building no.5 by counting its
area once in FSI as shown on plan at pg.C-1357 to C-1419 & requested to
allow the same.
As per reg.31(1)(xii) of DCPR 2034 ornamental projection / vertical fins
projecting not more than 1.20 mts. from the face of the building shall be
allowed free of FSI.
ornamental projection / vertical fins proposed cannot be misused & thus he
requested to all the same by counting its area once in FSI. Further, Architect
has stated that he has proposed the vertical fins at zero open space at all floors
and open space deficiency is already elaborated in the report and approvals /
orders are also requested.
‘Z40’ ornamental projection / vertical fins maximum upto 0.9 mts projecting from
the building line at all floors for the entire sale building no.5 as stated above
by counting its area once in FSI as per reg. 31(1)(xii) of DCPR 2034 as
97. Glass glazing :-

Architect has proposed ornamental projection of cladding/ glass façade/
glazing not exceeding 0.30 mtr. from building line at all floors all around for
wing ‘D’ & partly at certain locations & floors for wing ‘A’ to ‘C’ of Sale Building
No. 5 free of FSI as per reg. 31(1) (xxiv) of DCPR 2034 as shown on plan at pg.
C-1357 to C-1419 and requested to allow the same. Further, Architect has
stated that he has proposed the glass glazing at zero open space at all floors all
around for wing ‘D’ & partly at certain locations & floors for wing ‘A’ to ‘C’ of
Sale Building No. 5. However, open space deficiency is already elaborated in
the report and approval / orders are also requested.
98. Dry Balconies :-
The Architect has proposed Dry Balconies maximum upto 1.50 mts. for
services of kitchen at all wings at all habitable floors of sale building no.5 by
counting its area in sale FSI as shown on plan at pg.C-1357 to C-1419 &
requested to allow the same as per reg.31(2)(viii) of DCPR 2034.
99. Variable refrigment volume (VRV) platform: -
Architect has proposed Variable refrigment volume (VRV) platform for
use of commercial offices & Residential units for VRV/A.C. unit having
maximum sizes of 1.00 x 0.45 & 2.00 x 0.45 at all floors (i.e. 10 th to Terrace
floors) with the height not less than 0.60 m above floor level, touching to lift &
staircases at Sale Building no.5 free of FSI as per reg. 42(ii) (e) (iii) of DCPR
2034 as shown on plan at pg. C-1357 to C-1419 and requested to allow the
same.
In view of above, CEO(SRA)’s orders are requested to allow the Variable

refrigment volume (VRV) platform for use of commercial offices & Residential
units for VRV/A.C. unit having maximum sizes of 1.00 x 0.45 & 2.00 x 0.45 at
‘Z41 all floors (i.e. 10th to Terrace floors) with the height not less than 0.60 m above
’ floor level, touching to lift & staircases at Sale Building no.5 free of FSI under
cl. 6.17 read with as per reg. 42(ii) (e) (iii) of DCPR 2034 as requested by
Architect shall be allowed.
100. Refuge area and NOC from CFO:-

Architect has proposed refuge area at 6th , 10th, 17th, 24th, 31st, 38th & 45th
floor for ‘D’ wing & 10 th, 17th, 24th, 31st, 38th & 45th floor for ‘A’ to ‘C’ wing upto
4.25 % free of FSI & the area in excess of 4% is counted towards sale FSI at
Sale Building no.5 as per reg. 48(8)(a)(ii) read with reg. 31(1) (xix) of DCPR
2034 as shown on plan at pg. C-1357 to C-1419 and requested to allow the
same.
The details of refuge area required & provided for Sale Building 5 are
tabulated as below:
Refuge Floor & Refuge Area in. sq.mtr.
Sr. Bldg. Level in. mtr.
Wing Remarks
No. No. Reqd. Prop. Excess
10th (level 46.30), 89.39 Nil (i.e.4.037%

90.21
17th (level 68.70, Wing -A within 4.25%)
24th (level 91.10) 90.16 Nil (i.e.4.002% Excess
90.21
31st (113.50) Wing -B within 4.25%) area is
Sale A to
1 38th level 135.90 89.39 Nil (i.e.4.037% Counted
bldg.5 C 90.21
Wing -C within 4.25%) into sale
FSI
26.53
45th level 158.30 82.87 56.34
Wing – A
36.74
82.87 46.13
Wing -B
36.40
82.87 46.47
Wing -C
6th flr.(level 26.10)
66.63 66.63 Nil
89.39 Nil (i.e.4.037%
90.21
Wing -A within 4.25%)
10th flr (level 46.30), 90.16 Nil (i.e.4.002%
90.21
17th flr. (level 68.70) Wing -B within 4.25%)
24th (level (91.10) 89.39 Nil (i.e.4.037%
90.21
31st (level 113.50), Wing -C within 4.25%)
38th (level 135.90),
95.20 Nil (i.e.4.003%
95.27
Wing -D within 4.25%)
D
26.53
82.87 56.34
Wing – A
36.74
82.87 46.13
45th flr. level Wing -B
158.30 36.40
82.87 46.47
Wing -C
39.15
71.83 32.68
Wing -D

refuge area at 6th , 10th, 17th, 24th, 31st, 38th & 45th floor for ‘D’ wing & 10th,
17th, 24th, 31st, 38th & 45th floor for ‘A’ to ‘C’ wing upto 4.25 % free of FSI upto
‘Z42 4.25% free of FSI & the area in excess of 4% is counted towards sale FSI at
’ Sale Building 5 as per reg. 48(8)(a)(iii) read with reg. 31(1) (xix) of DCPR 2034
subject to CFO NOC of MCGM before C.C. to building u/ref. as requested by
Architect.
101. Fire Tower: -

The Architect has proposed fire Towers with smoke check lobby and fire
lift having min. size 1.80 mts. x 2.00 mts. opening at mid landing of each
staircase of wing ‘A’, ‘C’ & ‘D’ at external face of the building & at internal
chowk for wing ‘B’ of Sale Building no.5 having height 167.90 mts. for fire
emergency free of FSI as shown on plan pg. C-1357 to C-1419 and requested to
allow the same.
As per reg. 48(9)(B) read with reg. 31 (1) (xviii) of DCPR 2034 for High
rise building having height more than 70.00 mts. shall be provided with fire
tower at landing / mid-landing level with smoke check lobby with fireman lift
being integral part of the fire escape staircase or fire evacuation lift (Hydro
pneumatic /electrically operated) on the external face of the building having
opening within the fire escape staircase at landing / min-landing level with
smoke check lobby as approved by CFO shall be provided by counting its area
free of FSI.
fire Towers with smoke check lobby and fire lift having min. size 1.80 mts. x
2.00 mts. and opening at mid landing of each staircase of wing ‘A’, ‘C’ & ‘D’ at
‘Z43 external face of building & for wing ‘B’ at internal chowk accessible at ground
’ floor through open space at Sale Building no.5 having height 167.90 mts. for
fire emergency free of FSI under clause 6.17 of reg. 33(10) read with Reg. 31 (1)
(xviii), Reg. 48(9)(B) of DCPR 2034 subject to submission of NOC from CFO of
MCGM before granting C.C of building under reference as proposed by
Architect.
102. Mechanical Ventilated Shaft :-

The Architect has proposed 02 nos. of Mechanical Ventilated Shaft of
size as tabulated here under :-
Building height 167.90 mts. (i.e. above 30.00mts.)
Shaft No. Size Area Remarks

MVS – 1 9.42 x 7.10 68.88 Adequate
MVS – 2 14.99 x 7.10 106.43 Adequate
The Architect has proposed 2 nos. of adequate size mechanically

ventilated shaft as tabulated above providing light & ventilation to toilets,
staircase & alcove as per reg. 40(2) of DCPR 2034 free of FSI & requested to all
the same.
The Architect vide his letter at pg.C-1421 to C-1429 has stated that are
generated due to planning constraints thus has requested to allow the same.
The necessary NOC from Ex.Engineer (M&E) MCGM will be insisted before
granting further C.C. to building u/ref.
103. Open space deficiency :-

167.90 mtr.

167.90 mtr.
As per provisions of Clause 6.15 & 6.17 of Reg. 33(10) & Reg. 41(2) (i) (a)
table A & (5)(a)(iii) of DCPR 2034 for building having height of more than
120.00 mtr. open space required for L/V= max.20.00 Mtr. and for D/W = 9.00
Mtr. and front open space required is 3.00 Mtr. as per table 18 of Reg. 41(4) A,
the requirements of open spaces are as under.
Sale bldg. no.5

Building (height =167.90 mtr.)
Front open space = 3.00 mts. (Reg.41(4) table 18 sr.no.2)
Side & rear marginal O.S. =20.00mtr. (L/V) & 9.00mtr. (D/W)
(Reg.41(2)table A sr.no.2
J.O.S. of renewal tenement building no. 2 = 15.00 mts.(9.00 (D/W) + 6.00)
(Reg.41(5)(a)(iii))
J.O.S. of rehab Comm. building no. 1 = 12.00 mts. (9.00 (D/W) + 3.00)
(Reg.41(5)(a)(iii))

Renewal tenement building no.2
(depth = 8.38 mts.) = 4.50 mts.(3.00 + 1.50) (Reg.37(7)
(i))
Podium (height 34.50 mtr.)
F.O.S. from road = 3 .00 mts. (Reg.37(31))
O.S. at other sides = 3.00 mts. (Reg.37(31))
Renewal tenants building no.2
= 9.00 mts.(3.00 + 6.00) (Reg.41(5)(a)(iii))
Sale bldg. no.5
Side O.S. req.(m) O.S. prop. Defi. Defi. (%) Remarks
(m)
Basement
North --- 4.50 More than Nil Nil JOS between of rehab
(3.00 +1.50) 4.50 commercial bldg. no.1
&renewal tenement
bldg.no.2. and Sale bldg.
no.5
East --- 3.00 0.00 3.00 100% Existing 6.00 mtr. wide
road.
South --- 3.00 0.00 3.00 100% Ganpatrao Marg wide
30.50 mtr.
West --- 3.00 1.50 1.50 50.00% FOS / S.S.Amrutvar Marg
wide 24.40 mtr.
Podium
North -- 9.00 9.00 Nil Nil JOS between of renewal
(3.00 +6.00) tenement bldg.no.2. and
Sale bldg. no.5 podium
level.
East -- 3.00 1.00 2.00 75.00% Existing 6.00 mtr. wide
road.
South -- 3.00 0.00 3.00 100% From Commercial wing ‘D’
of bldg. under ref.
West -- 3.00 0.00 3.00 100% From Residential wing ‘A’
& ‘B’ of bldg. under ref.
Building
North D/W (9.00 + 6.00) 9.00 9.00 Nil JOS between renewal
15.00 tenement bldg.no.2. and
Sale bldg. no.5.
D/W (9.00 + 3.00) 9.00 3.00 25.00% JOS between Sale bldg.
12.00 no.5 & rehab commercial
bldg. no.1.
South L/V 20.00 0.00 20.00 100% FOS Ganpatrao Marg wide
30.50 mtr.
East L/V 20.00 0.00 20.00 100% From existing 6.00 mtr.
a-b wide road.
c-d L/V 20.00 14.20 5.80 29.00% From existing 6.00 mtr.
wide road.
West L/V 3.00 0.00 3.00 100% FOS / S.S.Amrutvar Marg
wide 24.40 mtr.
Architect has proposed open space as stated above, It is seen from the
above table that the open space deficiency generated for the sale building
no.05 is maximum 100% for basement, podium & building.

space which is as under: -
i) Small & odd size of plot to rehabilitate the slum dwellers.
ii) Large number of slum dwellers,
iii) major plot affected by road set-back.
iv) 12.20 mts. wide proposed road.
v) Amenity plot u/reg.14 of DCPR 2034
vi) Large number of rehab commercial shops etc.
vii) Availability of only approximate 52% of buildable plot for rehab & sale
buildings.
Therefore, Architect has requested vide his letter at pg. C-1421 to C-
1429 to condone the deficiency in the open spaces for the Sale building no.5 as
stated above as per provisions of clause 6.17 read with 6.16 of 33 (10) read
with reg. 41(4) table 18, 41(2)(i)(a) table (a), 42(II) (d) read with UDD notification
u/no. TPB - 4321/CS 12/2021/UD-11 dtd.21.12.2021 of DCPR 2034.
subject to NOC from CFO of MCGM before further CC to the building under
reference as requested by Architect.
provisions of Reg. No. 6(b) of DCR 1991, is verified as per given provisions in
In this context Architect has submitted his certificate vide pg. C/1667
i) Health Safety:
ii) Fire Safety:
The compliance of Fire safety measures is incorporated as a
condition of approval of amended plans being sought. The completion
certificates from CFO shall be insisted before grant of OCC.
Architect has not submitted the revised structural design, drawing &
calculations as per amended plans. The same will be insisted before granting
plinth C.C. A condition to that effect will be incorporated in amended plans
approval letter. Further structural stability certificate from the appointed
License Structural Engineer shall be insisted after completion of the building.
Structural stability of the building is thus taken care.
iv) Public Safety:
In view of above, Hon’ble CEO (SRA)’s orders are requested to condone
the open space deficiency of the sale building no.05 maximum upto 100% for
basement, podium & building by charging premium @ rate of 2.5% of RR rate
or of 10% of normal premium whichever is more for the sale component as per
provisions of clause 6.17 read with 6.16 of 33 (10) read with reg. (Reg.37(31))
‘Z44
41(4) table 18, 41(2)(i)(a) table (a), 42(II) (d) read with UDD notification u/no.
TPB - 4321/CS 12/2021/UD-11 dtd. 21.12.2021 of DCPR 2034 subject to
NOC from CFO of MCGM before further CC to the building under reference as
104. Swimming Pool (Infinity Pool):-

In this case, Architect has proposed 03 nos. of open to the sky swimming
pool (Infinity Pool) of 1.35 mts. depth at terrace floor level i.e. top most storey
at 47th floor level along with raised deck by counting its area free of FSI as per
Reg. 31(1)(xxii) of DCPR 2034 as shown on plan at pg. C-1357 to C-1419 and
The Architect has also proposed the double slab above the habitable floor
below to ensure avoidance of leakages. The Architect has stated that the
swimming pool is proposed as an additional amenity as per specific request of
his clients in order to improve the sale. He has further stated that the RCC
drawing, design & calculations along with the specification & water proofing
details shall be submitted.
Further, the developer has stated that no Municipal Water shall be used
for the swimming pool. Thus, he has requested to allow the swimming pool free
of FSI subject to that they shall submit the RCC drawing, design &
calculations along with the specification & water proofing details for the
swimming pool (Infinity pool) before asking C.C. for the same and that no
Municipal Water shall be used for filling up the swimming pool & shall
indemnify SRA & its officers against any form of litigation in this matter as
regards swimming pool. A registered under taking to that effect from the
developer shall be submitted before approval of swimming pool plans.

open to the sky swimming pool (Infinity Pool) of 1.35 mts. depth at terrace floor
level (47th floor level) i.e. top most storey along with raised deck by counting its
area free of FSI as per Reg. 31(1)(xxii) of DCPR 2034 as requested by the
Architect subject to that they shall submit the RCC drawing, design &
calculations along with the specification & water proofing details for the
‘Z45 swimming pool (Infinity pool) before asking C.C. for the same and that no
’ Municipal Water shall be used for filling up the swimming pool & shall
indemnify SRA & its officers against any form of litigation in this matter as
regards swimming pool. A registered under taking to that effect from the
developer shall be submitted before approval of swimming pool plans.
105. Roof Top Recreation Ground: -

The Architect has proposed additional recreation green area as shown on
plan at pg. C-1357 to C-1419 over the mandatory layout open space
requirement at terrace level as an additional amenity as per Reg. 37(22) of
DCPR 2034.
Further, the Architect has proposed a open to sky restaurant at terrace

level with area for service platform & toilet block on the top most open to sky
terrace level of completely commercial building / wing ‘D’ as per reg. 37(22) of
DCPR 2034 by counting free of FSI & counted the area of toilet block in sale
FSI as shown on plan at pg.C-1357 to C-1419 & requested to allow the same.
As per reg. 37(22) of DCPR 2034 in completely commercial building

terraces may be permitted to be used as restaurant subject to condition that
no inflammable material shall be used & safety & security shall be ensured. No
construction whatsoever temporary / permanent except services platform &
toilet block shall be permissible.
The Architect vide his letter at pg. C-1421 to C-1429 has stated that they
have proposed to use the open to sky terrace at top most storey of completely
commercial building /wing ‘D’ as restaurant as per the requirements of
direction of his client by counting free of FSI & counted the area of toilet block
in sale FSI as per reg. 37(22) as an additional amenity for the mixed
commercial users like business office & service apartments & thus, requested
to allow the same subject to allowing the user u/ref. only after obtaining CFO
MCGM, E.E.(T & C) MCGM NOC before approval of the plans & registered
undertaking & indemnity bond from the developer indemnifying CEO(SRA) &
his staff against any future accident / litigations thereof & they shall ensure
that they / the person running the premises shall take necessary precautions
for safety of the occupants.
The condition to that effect is incorporated in the Draft Revised LOI
In view of above Hon’ble CEO(SRA)’s

1. Approval is requested to allow roof top terrace garden over mandatory LOS as
an additional amenity as per Reg. 37(22) of DCPR 2034 as requested by the
Architect subject to that the terrace shall be designed and made impervious to
leakages.
2. Approval is requested to allow the open to sky terrace at top most storey of
completely commercial building /wing ‘D’ as restaurant as per the
requirements of direction of his client by counting free of FSI & counted the
area of toilet block in sale FSI as per reg. 37(22) of DCPR 2034 as an
‘Z46 additional amenity for the mixed commercial users like business office &
’ service apartments as requested by the Architect subject to allowing the user
u/ref. only after obtaining CFO MCGM, E.E.(T & C) MCGM NOC before
approval of the plans & registered undertaking & indemnity bond from the
developer indemnifying CEO(SRA) & his staff against any future accident /
litigations thereof & they shall ensure that they / the person running the
premises shall take necessary precautions for safety of the occupants.
106. Parapet Wall: -

The Architect has proposed 5.00 mts. high parapet wall with 60% voids
in surface area beyond height of 1.30 mts. on two sides of common terrace of
the Sale Building no.5 having height more than 70.00 mts. at topmost terrace
level and also at 8th floor (i.e. Amenity floor) open to sky terrace above podium
top having height 34.50 mts. as per reg. 37(23) of DCPR 2034 as shown on
plan at pg. C-1421 to C-1429 and requested to allow the same as the proposed
parapet walls cannot be misused & shall provide privacy & security for the
various activities proposed on these floors.
In view of above Hon’ble CEO(SRA)’s orders are requested to allow

parapet walls of height of 5.00 mts. with 60% voids in surface area beyond
height of 1.30 mts. on two sides of common terrace of the Sale Building no.5
‘Z47 having height more than 70.00 mts. at topmost terrace level and also at 8 th
’ floor (i.e. Amenity floor) open to sky terrace above podium top having height
34.50 mts. under cl. 6.17 read with as per reg. 37(23) of DCPR 2034 as
requested by the Architect for reasons as stated by him subject to undertaking
to not to misuse the same & NOC from CFO MCGM.
107. NOC from High Rise Committee:

167.90 mtr.

167.90 mtr.
As the height exceeds 120.00 mts., the NOC from Technical Committee
for High-Rise Building having height exceeding 120.00 mts. is necessary as per
Reg. 19(3) of DCPR 2034.
Further as per MCGM circular u/no Ch. E/2962/DPWS/HRB

dtd. 8.9.2015 vide at pg.C-1851 as the Government of India has initiated
reforms under Ease of doing Business to speedup approvals the IOD & plinth
C.C. will be issue for proposed development of buildings having height more
than 70.00 mts. pending the High-Rise Committee NOC subject to
i) The project proponent shall propose development as per draft guidelines

& TOR specified in Government resolution no. TPB 4313/CR-
41/2013/UD-11 dtd. 9.6.2014 &
ii) The project proponent shall undertake that they will revised the
executed work as per the suggestion of HRC & indemnify MCGM /
Committee member & his its officers any part of work executed upto
plinth needs to be demolished & reconstructed.
The Architect vide his representation at pg. C-1421 to C-1429 has

requested to grant approval to building plans & plinth C.C. to the Sale Building
no.5 pending to the HRC NOC as per MCGM policy circular dtd. 8.9.2015 as
mentioned above.
In view of above, Hon’ble CEO(SRA)’s orders are requested to grant

approval to plans & plinth C.C. at E.E.(SRA) level of Sale Building No. 5
‘Z48
having height more than 120.00 mts. pending the HRC NOC required as per
’
Reg. 19(3) of DCPR 2034 under clause 6.17 of Reg. 33(10) of DCPR 2034 read
with MCGM policy circular dtd.8.9.2015 at later stage as requested by the
Architect.
108. Exemption of Staircase Room, Passage, Lift and Lift Lobby Area etc.
From FSI Computation For High rise Sale bldg. no.5:-
1. The Architect has proposed high rise sale bldg. no. 05 wing ‘A’ to ‘D’
offices) + 6th (business office & Refuge) + 7th (business office) + 8th amenity
floor + 9th service floor + 10th to 47th upper floor service apartments
having height is 167.90 mtr.
wing ‘C’ comprising of 03 level basements + Gr. to 1 st (Retail) + 2nd

to 5th (business offices & part podium) + 6 th (business office & part
podium) + 7th (business office & part podium) + 8 th Amenity floor +9th
service floor + 10th to 47th upper residential floors having height is 167.90
mtr.
Wing ‘A’ & ‘B’ comprises of 03 level basements + Gr. (Retail &
Restaurant) + 1st (Restaurant part & podiums part) + 2 nd to 6th (Service
utility room part & part podium) + 7 th (part home occupation offices &
part podium) + 8th Amenity floor + 9th service floor + 10th to 47th
residential upper floors having height is 167.90 mtr.
The Architect has proposed 2 Nos. of open well staircases each having
flight width 2.00 mts. and appurtenant common passage along with 02 nos.
common lifts with 01 nos. of stretcher lift & 01 nos. of fire lift, lift lobbies for
each wing ‘A’ to ‘C’ & 2 Nos. of open well staircases each having flight width
2.00 mts. and appurtenant common passage along with 03 nos. common lifts
with 01 nos. of service lift & 01 nos. of fire lift, lift lobbies for purely commercial
building / wing ‘D’ free of FSI at all floors of Sale Building no.5 as shown on
plan as at pg.C-1357 to C-1419.
The Architect has also proposed exclusive 2.00 mts. wide doglegged
staircase along with lift for the restaurant / café / banquet hall at 8 th amenity
floor of sale building no.5.
The Architect vide his representation letter as at pg. C-1421 to C-1429

has requested to allow the exemption of following areas from FSI computation
of Sale Building No. 5 as per policy. Exemption to these areas from FSI
computation is permitted as per Reg. 31(1)(iii), (iv) & (xxv) read with clause 6.16
of reg. 33(10) of DCPR 2034 and as per MCGM policy circular dtd. 30/1/2020 with
the Special permission of Hon’ble Commissioner/Hon’ble CEO (SRA).
1. To allow staircase, lift, lift lobby areas as mentioned above on all habitable
floors free of FSI by charging premium for Sale building no.5.
2. To allow staircase, lift, lift lobby areas as mentioned above on all podium
floors /basement floor free of FSI without charging premium for Sale building
no.5.
3. To allow the staircase, lift / lift lobbies from top most floor to terrace sale
Building no.5 free of FSI by charging premium.
4. To allow lift machine rooms top most floor i.e. terrace floor free of FSI without
charging premium for sale Building no.5.

exemptions of all the above-mentioned areas in sr. no. 1 & 4 at Sale Building
‘Z49 no.5 free of FSI as per reg. 31(1)(iv) & (xxv), reg.48(5) A(e) read with clause
6.16 of reg. 33(10) of DCPR 2034 and as per MCGM policy circular
dtd.30.1.2020 as requested by Architect.
109. NOC from Civil Aviation:

In this case, Architect has proposed the layout of the S.R. Scheme
consisting of 5 number of building’s the details of the same is as under:
height 69.05 mtr.
4. High rise Rehab slum dweller bldg. no. 3 wing ‘A’ to ‘D’ comprising of 3
level basement + ground + 1st to 22nd upper floors having 75.03 mtr.
5. Rehab Commercial Building no.4 comprising of Basement(pt) +Gr. to 3 rd
(pt) having height 17.35 mtr. and
6. The Architect has proposed high rise sale bldg. no. 05 wing ‘A’ to ‘D’
offices) + 6th (business office & Refuge) + 7th (business office) + 8th amenity
floor + 9th service floor + 10th to 47th upper floor service apartments
having height is 167.90 mtr.
Wing ‘A’ & ‘B’ comprises of 03 level basements + Gr. (Retail & Restaurant) +
1st (Restaurant part & podiums part) + 2 nd to 6th (Service utility room part &
167.90 mtr.
As per reg. 18(h)(i) of DCPR 2034 since the plot is outside 2438 m from
international civil airport. The NOC from Civil Aviation Department is not
submitted by Architect/developer. Further, the Architect has submitted the
colour coded maps of AAI at pg. C-1657 to C-1659. As seen from the map the
permissible top elevation 135 mtr AMSL or below for sale building no.5 and
115 mtr AMSL or below for rehab buildings. The Architect has proposed Sale
Building no.5 with building height of 177.90 mts. & for rehab commercial
building no.3 with height of 80.53 mts. upto to the top of OHT/LMR/lighting
arrester.
In this case, the Architect has proposed high-rise sale building no.5
having total height 177.90 mts and Architect has stated that as per recent
discussion of installation of radars for monitoring air traffic, it is found as per
data available at pg. C-1845 to C-1847 that MMRDA has carried out survey
through ICAO for permissible building height at BKC. As per ICAO report
published in 2017 based on Indian regulations governing building height
norms plots in BKC is getting height is only between is 50.00 to 75.00 mts.
In view of above Hon’ble CEO(SRA) approval is requested to consider

stringency of approval to insist Civil Aviation NOC before granting C.C. to the
high-rise rehab & sale building beyond 50.00 mts. in the scheme. Accordingly,
‘Z50’ condition is incorporated in draft LOI to insist Civil Aviation NOC for
permissibility of building height before granting C.C. beyond 50.00 mts. in the
subject S.R. scheme.
110. Environmental Clearance:-

As per the provisions of recent Government of India notification u/no.
SO3999(E) dtd.9/12/2016. issued by Ministry of Environment & Forest vide at
pg.C-909 to C-919 the clearance from the concerned Regulatory Authority is
mandatory where the construction area/ activity area is more than 20000
sq.mt. in individual plot.
In the S.R. Scheme under reference the total proposed built up area in-
situ exceeds 20000 sq.mt. and thus, the S.R. scheme attracts the Environment
Clearance. Further, as per this office circular No. 177, SRA/ENG/Desk 1/1775
dtd.6.2.2017 as at pg. C-867 to C-895 of point no.5 for is of doing business in
case of building proposal wherein construction area exceeds 20000 sq.mts. the
IOA shall be issued for the full permissible potential & the CC restricted upto
maximum 20000 sq.mts. construction area.
Reference also requested to the circular of Government of Maharashtra

u/no. ENV 2013/ CR 39/TC-1 dtd. 17.1.2014 for requirements of
environmental clearance point no.6 which states that In view of the above
order of Hon’ble Court, redevelopment projects wherein rehabilitation of
tenants in SRA/Dilapidated/Cess buildings is involved, construction of rehab
component below 20000 sq.mts. may not be considered as a violation of EIA
notification of 2006 (amended time of time) and read with OM of MOEF dtd.
12.12.2012.
Thus, the Architect vide his representation as at pg. C-1421 to C-1429

has requested to approved the building plans for full permissible potential &
restrict the C.C. upto 20000 sq.mts.
In view of above, Hon’ble CEO(SRA)’s approval is requested to continue

the earlier approval to approve the building plans for full potential of the
scheme & to insist the prior environmental clearance as per Government of
‘Z51 India notification u/no. SO3999(E) dtd.9/12/2016 from the Component
’ Authority before granting C.C. to the total built up area in the scheme beyond
20,000.00 sq. mt., as requested by the Architect as per SRA circular no. 177
read with Government of Maharashtra circular dtd. 17.1.2014.
111. Electric substation: -
As per reg.28 (A) table no.11 sr.no.4 of DCPR 2034 transformer sub-
stations of the size of 143.00 sq. mts. is required for plot area of size above
4000 to upto 20000 sq.mts. (02 nos. of transformers with each size 13.00 x
5.50). The electric substations shall be allowed free of FSI as per Reg. 31 (1)
(xxx) of DCPR 2034.The substation shall be away from the main building at a
distance of at least 3.00 mts.
The Architect has proposed 1 nos. of electric substation having size of

12.00 mtr. x 3.50 mtr. area adm.40.00 sq.mtr. with height 5.00 mtr. instead of
required 2 Nos. as per Reg. 28 (A) table no.11 sr.no.4 of DCPR 2034 free of FSI
in R.G. portion on north side of the plot in the layout as shown on plans as at
pg. C-1357 to C-1419, as per reg.28 (A) table no.11 sr.no.4 read with Reg. 31
(1) (xxx) of DCPR 2034 & has requested to allow the same.
The Architect vide his representation as at pg. C-1421 to C-1429 has

stated that due to planning constraints like odd shape of plot, large number of
slum dwellers to be accommodated, major plot under the road set-back of
24.40 mtr. & 30.50 mtr. road & 12.20 mtr. road etc. and he has proposed 1
Nos. of electric sub-station instead of required 2 Nos. as per Reg. 28 (A) table
no.11 sr.no.4 of DCPR 2034 & requested to allow the same subject to
submission of NOC from electric supply company concerned regarding its
location and size before granting C.C. to Sale building u/ref.
In view of above, Hon’ble CEO (SRA)’s orders are requested to allow 1 nos.
of electric substation having size of 12.00 mtr. x 3.50 mtr. Having area
adm.40.00 sq.mtr. with height 5.00 mtr. instead of required 2 Nos. as per Reg.
28 (A) table no.11 sr.no.4 of DCPR 2034 free of FSI in R.G. portion on north
‘Z52 side of the plot in the layout with 3.00 mts. from the building and at a distance
of 1.50 mts. from the compound wall under reg.28 (A) table no.11 sr.no.4 &
Reg. 31 (1) (xxx) read with Clause 6.17 of Reg. 33(10) of DCPR 2034 subject to
submission of NOC from electric supply company concerned regarding its
location and size before granting C.C. to Sale building u/ref. as requested by
the Architect.
112. FUNGIBLE COMPENSATORY FSI:-

As mentioned in the report, Architect has proposed to apply DCPR 2034.
As per the same the fungible compensatory FSI is proposed to be utilized in
Rehab Commercial Building no.1, Renewal tenement Building no.2, Rehab
Slum dwellers building no.3, Rehab Commercial Building no.4 and sale
building no.5. The fungible compensatory FSI consumed is allowed without
charging premium for Rehab BUA and by charging premium for sale BUA as
per provision of reg.31(3) of DCPR 2034.
Fungible Compensatory FSI generated/proposed in all Rehab Building

and Sale building is detailed below:
Sr. Rehab BUA

Descriptions
No. (Area in Sq. m)
Rehab/Renewal Building No.1,2,3 & 4
1 Rehab Built Up Area 20550.31
2 Permissible Fungible FSI (35%) 7192.61
3 Proposed Fungible FSI 3120.12
Sale Building No.5 (Residential & Commercial)
1 Permissible sale Built Up Area 45280.85
2 Permissible Fungible FSI (35%) 15848.30

3 Proposed Fungible FSI 15810.01
In view of above, CEO (SRA)’s approval is requested to allow consuming

Fungible Compensatory FSI to the extent of 35% of BUA for Rehab component
‘Z53’
without charging premium and for sale building no.5 (Residential &
commercial) by charging premium as per provision of reg. 31(3) of DCPR 2034.
113. BUA/ FSI Statement (Scheme Parameter) :-

Sr. Description Earlier LOI Proposed LOI Total
no. Dtd. 05/07/2018
slum plot Non Slum Slum plot Non- Slum
33(10), 33(7), 33(10) plot 33(7)
DCR 1991 DCR DCPR DCPR-
1991 2034 2034
7082.99 7466.21
11024.70 7466.21
1 Area of plot 18490.91
(59.62%) (40.38%)
2 Deductions:
(a) Road set back area 4882.96 -- 7885.05 -- 7885.05
(b) Proposed Road -- -- -- -- --
(c) Buildable reservation -- -- 8.00 23.26 31.26
(i.e. H.S.) (32.01 /4) (69.79/3)
(d) Amenity Open Space
(reg.14, DCPR 2034) -- -- 110.46 74.81 185.27
(59.62%) (40.38%)
TOTAL (a+b+c+d) 4882.96 -- 8003.51 98.07 8101.58
3 Net plot area of plot (1-2 ) 2200.03 7466.21 3021.19 7368.14 10389.33
4 Additions:
(a) Road set back area 4882.96 -- 7885.05 -- 7885.05
(b) Proposed Road -- -- -- -- --
(c) Buildable reservation -- -- 8.00 23.26 31.26
(i.e. H.S.) (32.01 /4) (69.79 /3)
(d)Amenity Open Space --
(reg.14, DCPR 2034) -- -- -- -- --
TOTAL (a+b+c) 4882.96 -- 7893.05 23.26 7916.31

7082.99 7466.21
Total area of Plot
5. 10914.24 7391.40 18305.64
(3 + 4)
Max. FSI permissible on 4.00 3.00
6. 4.00 3.00 ---
plot
Max BUA permissible 28331.96 22398.63
7. 43656.96 22174.20 65831.16
(5 x 6)
8. Rehab BUA 13630.75 -- 17030.12 -- 17030.12
Renewal t/s. BUA (101 3344.48
9. -- 3520.19 3520.19
t/s.) --
10. Rehab Component 18418.15 -- 24207.85 -- 24207.85
Sale Component (1:1.1) 13813.61 -- 26628.64 18654.01 45282.65
11.
(1:0.75)
Total BUA sanctioned for 27444.36 -- 43656.96
project 43656.96
12. (restricted --
to 4.00)
Total FSI sanctioned 3.87 --
13. 4.00 -- 4.00
project
Sale in-situ permissible 13813.61 19054.15 26626.84
14. (restricted 18654.01 45280.85
to 4.00)
15. Sale in-situ proposed 13813.61 19054.15 26626.84 18654.01 45280.85
Total BUA proposed in- 27444.36 22398.63 43656.96
16. situ (Rehab + Sale) (restricted 22174.20 65831.16
to 4.00)
17. FSI in-situ 3.87 3.00 4.00 3.00 --
18. TDR generated Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
19. Nos. of tenements slum
dwellers 397
a. Resi. 192 101 296 101 (296 + 101)
b. Comm. 113 -- 243 (tenant) 243
c. R/C. 04 -- 09 -- 09
d. Existing Amenity/ --
Temple 07 (2 + 5) -- 15 (10 +5) -- 15 (10 + 5)
Total 316 101 563 101 664
20. Proposed Amenity
i) Bal 06 -- 03 -- 03
ii) Wel. Cent. 06 -- 03 -- 03
iii) Soci. Off. 06 01 07 01 08
iv) Fitness Centre 01 01 -- 01 01
v) Skill Dev. -- -- 03 -- 03
vi) Yuva Kendra -- -- 03 -- 03
vii) Community -- -- 01 -- 01
Hall
Total 18 01 20 02 22
21. Extra PAP 197 Nil 101 Nil 101
22. Housing for dishoused Nil 02 -- -- --
23. Homeless shelter (HS) Nil 01 03 -- 03
In view of above, Hon’ble CEO (SRA)’s approval is requested to consider
scheme parameters and to issue the LOI as per provision of Clause VIII, 3.1 to
‘Z54’
3.8 under of reg. 33(10) & reg. 33(7) of DCPR 2034.
114. Annexure-III:
The Architect has now proposed total 687 nos. (296 nos. Resi., 243 nos.
Comm., 09 nos. R/C, 15 nos. of existing amenity, 101 nos. of Extra PAP, 20 nos. all
amenities, 01 Comm. Hall & 03 nos. H.S. (Homeless Shelter) in the SR Scheme
under Reg. 33(10) of DCPR 2034.
In this case, Architect has stated the certified Annexure-III for 531 nos. of
t/s. for the said scheme from F.C (SRA) has been obtained vide at pg. C-1465.
and Architect has requested to insist the revised annexure III for above said t/s
before further CC to any building in the layout.

In view of above Hon’ble CEO (SRA)’s approval is requested to insist the
‘Z55 Revised Annexure III for balance tenements as stated above before further CC
’ to any building in the layout as requested by Architect.
115. Part terrace at sale bldg. no. 5:-

The Architect has proposed part terrace open to sky at 47 th floor
accessible through the common staircase & lift free of FSI as per reg. 31(2) (iv)
for of DCPR 2034 as shown on plan at pg. C-1357 to C-1419.
116. Balconies at sale building no.5 :-

The Architect has proposed Balconies of maximum depth of 1.35 mts.
beyond building line at sale building no.5 by counting its area is sale fungible
compensatory FSI as per reg.37(20) of DCPR 2034. However, the marginal open
spaces at west side is reduced to less than 1.50 mts. The cognizance of the
deficient open space is taken above at open space deficiency point as per reg.
42(II) (d) read with UDD notification u/no. TPB -4321/CS 12/2021/UD-11 dtd.
21.12.2021.
In view of above, Hon’ble CEO (SRA)’s: -
1. Approvals is requested to Para’s sidelined ‘D’,‘H’, ‘K’, ‘L’, ‘M’, ‘N’, ‘O’, ‘Z1’,
‘Z2’, ‘Z3’, ‘Z5’, ‘Z11’, ‘Z12’, ‘Z15’, ‘Z19’, ‘Z20’, ‘Z23’, ‘Z24’, ‘Z28’ ‘Z30’, ‘Z32’,
‘Z33’, ‘Z36’, ‘Z37’, Z38’, ‘Z40’, Z42’, ‘Z45’, ‘Z46’,‘Z49’, ‘Z50’, ‘Z51’, ‘Z53’,
‘Z54’ & ‘Z55’.
‘XX’
2. Orders are requested to Para’s sidelined ‘A’ ‘B’,‘C’,‘E’, ‘F’, ‘G’, ‘I’, ‘J’, ‘P’ to
‘Z’, ‘Z4’ ‘Z6’ to ‘Z10’, ‘Z13’, ‘Z14’, ‘Z16’, ‘Z17’, ‘Z18’, ‘Z21’, ‘Z22’, ‘Z25’,
‘Z26’, ‘Z27’, ‘Z29’, ‘Z31’, ‘Z34’, ‘Z35’, ‘Z39’, ‘Z41’, ‘Z43’, ‘Z44’, ‘Z47’, ‘Z48’
& ‘Z52’.
3. To sanction 4.00 FSI for scheme under 33(10) & 3.00 FSI for scheme
under 33(7).
4. Approval is requested to Draft Revised Letter of Intent as at pg. C-1507 to
C-1513.
On Hon’ble CEO (SRA)’s approval on para sidelined ‘XX’ above in the affirmative
Ex. Eng. (SRA)’s approval is requested to :-
1. Draft amended IOA plans of Renewal tenements building no.2 & draft IOA
plans of Rehab Slum dwellers Building no.3, 1 & 4 as at pg. C-1357 & C-
1359, C-1361 to C-1367 & 1369 to C-1401 and 1403 respectively.
2. Draft amended IOA letter of Renewal tenements building no.2 as at pg C-
‘YY’
1653
3. Draft IOA letter of Rehab Slum dwellers Building no.3, 1 & 4 as at pg C-
1639 to C-1651.
Submitted please,
S.E. (SRA) A.E. (SRA) Ex.Eng.(SRA)

(P.L.Shingare) (S.S. Shinde) (U.C. Bodkhe )

Final Revised LOI Report Corrected by E.E.dtd.16.2.2022 As Per DCPR 2034 Rohini

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Final Revised LOI Report Corrected by E.E.dtd.16.2.2022 As Per DCPR 2034 Rohini

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Final Revised LOI Report Corrected by E.E.dtd.16.2.2022 As Per DCPR 2034 Rohini

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY

Sub:- Proposed conversion LOI for Vital Public Project by amalgamation of

Developer :- M/s. Always Remember Properties Pvt. Ltd.

Plans :- C-1357 to C-1419.

Reference is requested to the representation of new Architect Shri Abhay

The draft Ann- II displayed on site by the Competent Authority is

In view of above, Hon’ble CEO(SRA)’s orders are requested to consider

‘A’ 21.7.2018 as requested by the Architect subject to restricting the CC of the

Accordingly, the new Architect Shri. Abhay Todankar, M/s. Newtech

1. DRAFT ANNEXURE II/APPLICABILITY OF SRA CIRCULAR NO.177,

In view of above, CEO(SRA)’s orders are requested

1. To process the proposal to amalgamate the encroached areas under

2. Planning /permissibility /User of Sale Bldg. no.05:-

Wing ‘C’ comprising of 03 level basements + Gr. to 1 st (Retail) + 2nd to 5th

2.1 Home Occupation Offices :-

2.2 Service Apartments: -

In view of above, Hon’ble CEO(SRA)’s

2. Orders are requested to allow proposed service apartments by counting

3. Change of Architect/Acceptance of Supervision Memo :-

1) Resignation of L.S. Shri Anil Katdare of M/s. AAK. Associates at pg. C-

In view of above, Hon’ble CEO(SRA)’s approval is requested to accept

4. Salient features of the proposal: -

D.P. 2034:- As per the D.P 2034 remarks dtd.

Number of PAP tenements generated in

Sr. Document Area in sq.mt. of Amalgamated S.R.Scheme Remarks

However, in this case, as per the letter of Asst. Commissioner

In view of above nil nos. of PAP’s are generated considering tenement

7. ELIGIBILITY OF SLUM DWELLERS:

In view of above, CEO(SRA)’s orders are requested

The condition to that effect is incorporated in the Draft Revised LOI.

The condition to that effect is incorporated in the Draft Revised LOI.

In view of above, CEO(SRA)’s orders are requested to issue LOI/IOA to the

9. Permissible FSI for the development under DCR 33(7) :-

ÛÎú.ÃÖ.†Ö/´ÖÖ»Ö´Ö¢ÖÖ/480/¯ÖÏ.†.(ÃÖÝÖéÃÖ)/ÃÖÖêÃÖÖ-2 dtd. 6.4.2018

Table at point no.14 (The co-relation for C.C. of independent tenant

the provisions of clause 2 of Appendix -III of Reg. 33(7) of DCR 1991 as

4) To insist the NOC of SWD department of MCGM for drainage channel /

10.1 D.P. 1991:-

The calculation of reservations to be handed over to MCGM is as follows :

Rehab building no.4 (plan at pg. C-1357 & C-1403) :-

The Architect has represented the hardship justifying the deficiency in

In view of above, Hon’ble CEO(SRA)’s orders are requested,

11. Pathway / Internal Access Roads :-

Thus, the Architect has requested to allow 9.00 mtrs. wide

In view of above, the Hon’ble CEO (SRA)’s approval is requested to allow

12. Amenity under Reg. 14(A) of DCPR 2034

In view of above, Hon’ble CEO(SRA)’s approval is requested to allow

13. Layout (amalgamation cum sub-division):-

Sr. Amalg.S.R. Scheme Plot area Remark

In view of above Hon’ble CEO (SRA)’s approval is requested to allow the

Sr. Net Plot Require RG 8% Proposed Remarks

15. Ratio of FSI:-

Accordingly, the Incentive BUA factor is worked out as follows:

In view of above, Hon’ble CEO(SRA)’s approval is requested to allow to

16. General Planning :-

 Planning of Rehab Bldg. no.1,3 &4:

17. Tenements Statement for Rehab component under reg. 33(10)

Tenements statement of Rehab Slum dwellers Building No. 3 :-