Bagbag ES-Income Generating Project-SY 2021-2022
Bagbag ES-Income Generating Project-SY 2021-2022
Bagbag ES-Income Generating Project-SY 2021-2022
Department of Education
Region IV-A CALABARZON
CITY SCHOOLS DIVISION OF TANAUAN
BAGBAG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
BAGBAG, TANAUAN CITY
Maria S. Cabrera
Teacher III, Gulayan sa Paaralan Coordinator
Aileen A. Cabuhat
Teacher I, School Based Feeding Coordinator
I. PROJECT CONTACTS:
Erwena C. Vergara
Teacher III, Project Proponent
Contact: 09517107776 E-mail Address: erwena.vergara@deped.gov.ph
Maria S. Cabrera
Teacher III-Project Proponent
Contact: 09179958640 E-mail Address: maria.cabrera@deped.gov.ph
Aileen A. Cabuhat-
Teacher I-Project Proponent
Contact: 09127366247 E-mail Address: aileen.cabuhat@deped.gov.ph
Esteban M. Castillo
Head Teacher III- Bagbag Elementary School/Project Adviser
Contact: 09190915756 E-mail Address: esteban.castillo@deped.gov.ph
Femie A. Velasco
Public Schools District Supervisor/Monitoring Personnel
Contact: 09319586175 E-mail Address:femie.velasco@deped.gov.ph
Consultation with the Bagbag ES School was made if it was possible to have
hydroponics gardening project in the school. As an affirmation, the school head
helped in the procurement of the materials for the hydroponics gardening. Through
the fund from the stakeholders, the BES was able to start its trial hydroponics system
with lettuce as the main crop.
At present, the school has 12 hydroponics boxes set-up for lettuce growing
and these were fully utilized during the trial stage established on the last quarter of
2021 The harvests were sold and proceeds were used to purchase additional
materials upsizing the garden. After establishing its feasibility in the last six months
(Appendix A), the proponents had decided to pursue the Project LIKAS in response
to challenges identified. After two years of implementation, the proponents will
prepare action research to determine its impact on measurable parameters and a
localized handbook/manual on lettuce growing using the hydroponics technology for
division-wide use. A monitoring tool was adapted by the proponents, attached as
Appendix B.
V. PROJECT METHODOLOGY
Project Schedule
Activity Time Frame
1. Preliminary Activities
Preparation of the greenhouse 2 days
Preparation of the hydroponics box and cups 2 day
2. Process of Production*
Sowing 1 day
Germination 2 weeks
Preparation of the hydroponics box and cups 1 day
Seed transplanting (from seedling tray to 1 day
hydroponics box)
3. Harvesting (after 30 days from transplanting) 3 days
4. Marketing 2 days
5. Maintenance Year-round
6. Implementation/Project Duration 24 months
7. Preparation of Action Research /Communicating 3 months
Results in Research Fora
8. Creation of Handbook/Manual on lettuce growing 3 months
using the hydroponics technology for division-wide
use.
B. Project Deliverables
Product Description
1. Fresh Lettuce raw leafy vegetables grown organically
via hydroponics technology. The
product will be cut from its based,
loosely packed in recyclable
plastic/paper.
2. Lettuce-Based Edibles these are readily consumable/easily
prepared food with lettuce as main
ingredient/flavor enhancer (per order
basis, 3 days in advance)
a. vegetable salad combination of lettuce, slices of tomato,
cucumber, apple, mango, nuts and
choice of Caesar salad
Bagbag Elementary School
Bagbag, Tanauan City, Batangas 4232
Bagbag17@gmail.com
0919-091-5756
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region IV-A CALABARZON
CITY SCHOOLS DIVISION OF TANAUAN
BAGBAG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
BAGBAG, TANAUAN CITY
dressing/vinaigrette (approximately
Php 50.00 per 500 ml tub)
b. clubhouse/sandwich three-layer sandwich with choice of
spam/tuna/egg/adobo flakes/chicken
flakes with cheese, tomato, cucumber,
lite mayonnaise, and lettuce
(approximately Php 50.00 per order)
3. Action Research Proposal/Action to determine the effectiveness of Project
Research Completed Paper LIKAS on several parameters identified
at the course of its two-year
implementation, to be communicated in
various research fora
4. Handbook/Manual on Growing a localized manual based on the actual
Lettuce Using Hydroponics experiences of the proponents during its
implementation, approved and
recommended by LRMDS for division-
wide use
A. Project Budget
B. Sources
Prepared by:
ERWENA C. VERGARA
Teacher III
ESTEBAN M. CASTILLO
Head Teacher III
Reviewed:
Recommending Approval:
RHINA O. ILAGAN
Education Program Supervisor
Officer-In-Charge
Office of the Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Approved:
ROGELIO F. OPULENCIA
Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Officer-In-Charge
Office of the Schools Division Superintendent
Appendix B:
LOCALIZED MONITORING TOOL FOR IGP
Name: _____________________________________________
General Instruction:
Carefully fill out this form to ensure correctness and accuracy of data and information.
Data and information in this form are intended exclusively for the purpose of this activity. This
will be kept by the process owner for the purpose of verifying and authenticating identity of the
participants. Serving other purposes not intended by the process owner is a violation of Data
Privacy Act of 2012. Data subjects voluntarily provided these data and information explicitly
consenting the process owner to serve its purpose.
Directions: Rate the Proponent based from how the project is executed and done. Put a check
mark (✓) under the column of your response.
Strongly Strongly
Indicators Agree Disagree
Agree Disagree
1. The proposed IGP is aligned with DepEd thrusts
and contributory to the attainment of
the Department’s Vision and Mission.
2. The proponents clearly presented the reasons for
the IGP, and what needs or problems they want
to solve/address and innovate.
3. The proposed IGP benefited the learners and
other school stakeholders.
4. The proposed IGP has a realistic management
plan and the resources needed to complete the
project within two years.
5. The proponents had presented or included all the
details of the IGP.
6. Sources of fund in sustaining the IGP are in the
form of donations and not taken from the school
MOOE fund.
7. Any form of solicitation was not evident.
8. The proponents had shown proofs of donation,
MOA, or any evidence of the IGP’s sourcing.
9. The IGP has a provision for sustainability and
replicability.
Comments/Suggestions/Recommendations: