Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Appendix: KAIZEN Questionnaire: General Organizational Information

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 18

Appendix: KAIZEN Questionnaire

General Organizational Information

Organization’s name
Organization’s address
Respondent’s name and designation
Respondent’s contact no./e-mail
address
Primary product(s) of the organization
Type of company Small scale Medium scale

Since when you have started your 1–4 years 5–8 years 9–12 years More than
manufacturing organization 12 years
Since when you are applying CI <2 years 2–4 years 4–6 years >6 years
approach
What is the present status of Early Midway Majority Successfully
implementing CI strategies stages stages completed completed
Which type of KAIZEN is more Process type Flow type
effective

Part A: Please indicate the level of usage (maturity level) and level of i­ mportance
of continuous improvement strategies in your organization

Level of usage Level of importance


To To a To a
Not Not at all some moderate large
Mature Developing Immature applicable important extent extent extent
CI strategies (1) (2) (3) (4) (1) (2) (3) (4)
Supplier development
Total cost 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
management
Value analysis 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer International 115


Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019
J. Singh, H. Singh, Strategic Implementation of Continuous Improvement
Approach, SpringerBriefs in Operations Management,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93121-0
116 Appendix: KAIZEN Questionnaire

Level of usage Level of importance


To To a To a
Not Not at all some moderate large
Mature Developing Immature applicable important extent extent extent
CI strategies (1) (2) (3) (4) (1) (2) (3) (4)
Value stream 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
analysis
Process (just in time)
Cycle time 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
reduction
Process flow 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
analysis
Material flow 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
analysis
Theory of 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
constraints
Redesign 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
Workflow 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
analysis
Total quality management
5S 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
Error proofing 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
analysis
Failure mode 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
effect analysis
Six Sigma 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
Standardization 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
Total productive maintenance
Preventive 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
maintenance
Autonomous 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
maintenance
Equipment 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
restoration
Change over 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
reduction:
SMED
Minor stoppage 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
elimination
Customer relationship
Quality 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
function
deployment
Customer 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
quality, cost,
and delivery
analysis (QCD)
If any other,
please specify
Appendix: KAIZEN Questionnaire 117

Part B: Please indicate the level of usage (maturity level) and level of i­ mportance
of CI support methods in your organization

To To a To a
Not Not at all some moderate large
CI support Mature Developing Immature applicable important extent extent extent
methods (1) (2) (3) (4) (1) (2) (3) (4)
People (total involvement)
Internal training 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
and monitoring
Manager 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
development
Suggestion 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
system
Team-based 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
improvement
Principles of 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
KAIZEN
System (support core work)
Finance 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
Marketing 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
Process flow 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
mapping
Support and 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
administrative
KAIZEN
Leadership
Vision alignment 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
and direction
Policy 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
deployment
Recognition 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
Promoting culture
Use of ISO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
9000/TS
Standards
Promoting 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
through notice
boards
Promoting 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
through internal
media
(magazines,
newsletters)
Regular shop 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
floor visit by
management
Face-to-face 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
communication
If any other,
please specify
118 Appendix: KAIZEN Questionnaire

Part C: Please tick mark (√) the appropriate choice to indicate the i­mportant
barriers in implementing CI activities

Most
Not at all Neutral Important important
S. No. Barriers important (1) (2) (3) (4)
1 Poor planning 1 2 3 4
2 Lack of management commitment 1 2 3 4
3 Resistance of the workforce 1 2 3 4
4 Lack of continuous training and 1 2 3 4
education
5 Teamwork complacency 1 2 3 4
6 Use of an off-the-shelf program 1 2 3 4
7 Failure to change organizational 1 2 3 4
philosophy
8 Lack of resources 1 2 3 4
9 Inability to change organizational 1 2 3 4
culture
10. Inability to build a learning 1 2 3 4
organization that provides for
continuous improvement
11 Incompatible organizational 1 2 3 4
structure and isolated individuals
and departments
12 Inappropriate reward system 1 2 3 4
13 Ineffective measurement techniques 1 2 3 4
14 Paying inadequate attention to 1 2 3 4
customers
15 Inadequate use of empowerment 1 2 3 4
and teamwork
16 Poor interdepartmental relations 1 2 3 4
17 Lack of employee trust in senior 1 2 3 4
management
18 Politics and turf issues 1 2 3 4
19 Lack of strong motivation 1 2 3 4
20 Drive for short-term financial results 1 2 3 4
21 Lack of leadership 1 2 3 4
22 Lack of time to devote to quality 1 2 3 4
initiative
23 Incompatible organizational 1 2 3 4
structure and isolated individuals
and departments
24 Use of a prepackaged program 1 2 3 4
25 Inadequate knowledge or 1 2 3 4
understanding of KAIZEN
26 If any more, please specify
Appendix: KAIZEN Questionnaire 119

Parts D: Please indicate the role of CI values in enhancing the performance of


continuous improvement strategies

Not at all To some To a moderate To a great


Values important 1 extent 2 extent 3 extent 4
CI driving values
Respect 1 2 3 4
Responsibility 1 2 3 4
Empathy 1 2 3 4
CI enabling values
Humbleness 1 2 3 4
Trust 1 2 3 4
Openness 1 2 3 4
Cooperation 1 2 3 4
CI infusion values
Leadership
Structure support 1 2 3 4
Control system 1 2 3 4
Explicit behavior 1 2 3 4
change
Customer relationship
Efficiency 1 2 3 4
Quality 1 2 3 4
Competence 1 2 3 4
Flexibility 1 2 3 4
Innovation 1 2 3 4
Speed 1 2 3 4
Capacity 1 2 3 4
Uniqueness 1 2 3 4
Reliability 1 2 3 4

Part E: To what extent do you agree with the following statements c­ oncerning
the variable for enhancing the performance of continuous improvement
strategies?

Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly


S. No. Variables (1) (2) (3) agree (4)
Continuous improvement system and structure
1 Employees search for information, new 1 2 3 4
ideas, and technologies as a part of CI
practices
2 Employees facilitate and encourage 1 2 3 4
informal relationship as part of
continuous improvement practices
120 Appendix: KAIZEN Questionnaire

Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly


S. No. Variables (1) (2) (3) agree (4)
3 Employees take reasonable risks by 1 2 3 4
continuously experimenting with the new
ways of doing work
4 Employees use failures as an opportunity 1 2 3 4
to learn as part of continuous
improvement
5 Employees let organizational objectives 1 2 3 4
guide the evaluation of new ideas and
information as part of continuous
improvement practices
6. Employees actively monitor progress by 1 2 3 4
using action plans to ensure the goals of
continuous improvement program
Customer and supplier relationship
1 The firm’s reputation is important to the 1 2 3 4
firm’s competitive advantage
2 The product supplied is important to the 1 2 3 4
firm’s competitive advantage
3 The customer satisfaction is important in 1 2 3 4
the firm’s competitive advantage
Organizational culture
1 The organizational culture encourages 1 2 3 4
employees to hold knowledge closely
2 The organizational culture reinforces 1 2 3 4
behavior that upholds traditions
3 The culture encourages managers to 1 2 3 4
closely monitor work time
4 The culture focuses on short-term 1 2 3 4
performance
5 The culture encourages employee to 1 2 3 4
interact with other people
Firm performance
1 As a result of continuous improvement in 1 2 3 4
product, faster speed to market occurs
based on perception of actual
performance
2 As a result of continuous improvement in 1 2 3 4
product, the higher product
configurations occur based on perception
of actual performance
3 As a result of continuous improvement in 1 2 3 4
product, higher success of new products
launched occurs based on perception of
actual performance
4 Improved product innovation of new 1 2 3 4
parts and processes occurs based on
perception of actual performance
Appendix: KAIZEN Questionnaire 121

Part F: To what extent your organization has achieved the benefits of CI


implementation

Nominal Reasonable High Extremely high


S. No Benefits gain (1) gain (2) gain (3) gain (4)
Organization achievement
1 Achieving high return on 1 2 3 4
capital employed
2 Development of core-level 1 2 3 4
competencies
3 Increased profit 1 2 3 4
4 Improved business 1 2 3 4
performance
5 Enhanced professionalism in 1 2 3 4
the organization
6 Improvement in competitive 1 2 3 4
image of the organization
Productivity
7 Enhanced production rates 1 2 3 4
8 Improvement in overall 1 2 3 4
equipment effectiveness
9 Reduced material and operator 1 2 3 4
movement
10 Effective process flow 1 2 3 4
11 Reduced setup time 1 2 3 4
12 Reduced cycle time 1 2 3 4
Cost
13 Reduced operating cost 1 2 3 4
14 Reduced cost of consumables 1 2 3 4
15 Reduced cost of overhead 1 2 3 4
expenditure
16 Reduced cost of inventories 1 2 3 4
17 Reduced inspection cost 1 2 3 4
Quality
18 Reduced customer complaints 1 2 3 4
and rejections
19 Effective utilization of quality 1 2 3 4
tools
20 Reduced scrap and rework 1 2 3 4
21 Reduced operator mistakes 1 2 3 4
22 Reduced total percentage 1 2 3 4
defectives
23 Improved quality of work-life 1 2 3 4
Delivery
24 Improved delivery reliability 1 2 3 4
25 Providing faster delivery of the 1 2 3 4
product
122 Appendix: KAIZEN Questionnaire

Nominal Reasonable High Extremely high


S. No Benefits gain (1) gain (2) gain (3) gain (4)
26 Customer satisfaction by 1 2 3 4
providing at a time delivery
Safety
27 Reduced number of accidents 1 2 3 4
28 Maintaining health and safety 1 2 3 4
standards
If any more, please specify

Signature of the Respondent


Bibliography

Abdolshah, M., & Jahan, A. (2006). How to use continuous improvement tools in different life peri-
ods of organization. International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology 2,
772–777, Singapore: IEEE.
Adams, M., Componation, P., Czarnecki, H., & Schroer, B. J. (1999). Simulation as a tool for con-
tinuous process improvement. Proceedings of Winter Simulation Conference, Phoenix, USA,
1, 766–773.
Agus, A., & Hassan, Z. (2011). Enhancing production through total quality management: Strategies
for competitive advantage. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24(1), 1650–1662.
Ahmed, S., Hassan, M. H., & Fen, Y. H. (2005). Performance measurement and evaluation in an
innovative modern manufacturing system. Journal of Applied Sciences, 5(2), 385–401.
Ahuja, I. P. S., & Khamba, J. S. (2008). Total productive maintenance: Literature review and direc-
tion. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 25(7), 709–756.
Al-Harbi, K. M. A. (2001). Application of AHP in project management. International Journal of
Project Management, 19, 19–27.
Almeanazel, O. T. R. (2010). Total productive maintenance review and overall equipment effective-
ness measurement. Jordan Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, 4(4), 517–522.
Ashmore, C. (2001). Kaizen–and the art of motorcycle manufacture. Manufacturing Engineer,
80(5), 220–222.
Augsdorfer, P., & Harding, R. (1995). Changing competitive forces in Europe: Continuous
improvement in a sample of French, German and British companies. European Business
Review, 95(4), 3–9.
Babbar, S. (2005). Service quality and business ethics. International Journal of Services and
Operations Management, 1(3), 203–219.
Bahurmoz, A. (2006). The analytic hierarchy process at Dar Al-Hekmah, Saudi Arabia. Interfaces,
33(4), 70–78.
Bamber, C. J., Sharp, J. M., & Hides, M. (1999). Factors affecting successful implementation of
total productive maintenance: A UK manufacturing case study perspective. Journal of Quality
in Maintenance Engineering, 5(3), 162–181.
Bayazit, O., & Karpak, B. (2007). An analytical network process based framework for success-
ful total quality management: An assessment of Turkish manufacturing industry readiness.
International Journal of Production Economics, 105(1), 79–96.
Bayo-Moriones, A., Bello-Pintado, A., & Merino-Diaz de Cerio, J. (2010). 5S use in manufactur-
ing plants: Contextual factors and impact on operating performance. Journal of Quality and
Reliability Management, 27(2), 217–230.

© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer International 123


Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019
J. Singh, H. Singh, Strategic Implementation of Continuous Improvement
Approach, SpringerBriefs in Operations Management,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93121-0
124 Bibliography

Ben-Daya, M., & Raouf, A. (1996). A revised failure mode and effect analysis model. International
Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 13(1), 43–47.
Bendell, T. (2006). A review and comparison of six sigma and the lean organizations. The TQM
Magazine, 18(3), 255–262.
Berger, A. (1997). Continuous improvement and Kaizen: Standardization and organizational
designs. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 8(2), 110–117.
Berggren, C. (1994). Nummi vs. Uddevalla. Sloan Management Review winter, 12–16.
Bessant, J. (2000).Creating and maintaining high involvement innovation. Seminar on kaizen from
understanding to action, 30 March, Institute of Electrical Engineers, London.
Bessant, J.  (2000). Developing and sustaining employee involving in continuous improvement.
IEE Seminar, Kaizen: from understanding to action (Ref. No. 2000/035), London, 2, pp. 1–18.
Bessant, J., & Caffyn, S. (1994). Rediscovering continuous improvement. Technovation, 14(1),
17–29.
Bessant, J., & Caffyn, S. (1997). High involvement innovation through continuous improvement.
International Journal of Technology Management, 14(1), 7–28.
Bessant, J., Caffyn, S., & Gallagher, M. (2001). An evolutionary model of continuous improve-
ment behavior. Technovation, 21(2), 67–77.
Bessant, J., & Francis, D. (1999). Developing continuous improvement capability. International
Journal of Operations and Production Management, 19(11), 1106–1119.
Bhat, K. S., & Rajashekhar, J. (2009). An empirical study of barriers to TQM implementation in
Indian Industry. The TQM Magazine, 21(3), 261–272.
Bhuiyan, N., & Baghel, A. (2005). An overview of continuous improvement: from the past to the
present. Management Decision, 43(5), 761–771.
Bhuiyan, N., Baghel, A., & Wilson, J. (2006). A sustainable continuous improvement methodology
at an aerospace company. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management,
55(8), 671–687.
Black, S. A., & Porter, L. J. (1996). Identification of the critical factors of TQM. Decision Sciences,
27(1), 1–21.
Blanchard, B. S. (1997). An enhanced approach for implementing total productive maintenance in
the manufacturing environment. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 3(2), 69–80.
Boer, H., Berger, A., Chapman, R., & Gertsen, F. (Eds) (2000). CI changes: From suggestion
box to organisational learning. Continuous improvement in Europe and Australia. Aldershot:
Ashgate Publishing.
Boer, H., Caffyn, S., Chapman, R., Corso, M., & Coughlan, P. (1999). Continuous product innova-
tion and knowledge management: the CIMA supporting methodology. 6th International prod-
uct development management conference, EIASM, Cambridge.
Bolton, M., & Heap, J. (2002). The myth of continuous improvement. Work Study, 51(6), 309–313.
Bon, A. T. B., & Karim, N. (2011). Total productive maintenance application to reduce defects of
product. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 7(1), 11–17.
Bond, T.  C. (1999). The role of performance measurement in continuous improvement.
International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 19(12), 1318–1334.
Bounds, G., Yorks, L., Adams, M., & Ranney, G. (1994). Beyond total quality management toward
the emerging paradigm. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Bradley, J., & Willett, J. (2004). Cornell students participate in lord corporation’s Kaizen projects.
Interfaces, 34(6), 451–459.
Brunet, A.  P., & New, S. (2003). Kaizen in Japan: an empirical study. International Journal of
Operations and Production Management, 23(12), 1426–1446.
Brunet, P. (2000). Kaizen in Japan. IEE Seminar, Kaizen: from understanding to action (Ref. No.
2000/035). London, pp. 1–10.
Burns, A. (2000). Choosing the right tool from the tool box-some examples of Gemba Kaizen
practice. IEE Seminar, Kaizen: from understanding to action (Ref. No. 2000/035), London, 6,
pp. 1–10.
Bibliography 125

Caffyn, S. (1999). Development of a continuous improvement self-assessment tool. International


Journal of Operations and Production Management, 19(11), 38–53.
Carlson, J.  G. (1989). JIT applications to warehousing operations. Engineering Costs and
Production Economics, 17, 315–322.
Chakrborty, A., Bhattacharya, M., Ghosh, S., & Sarkar, G. (2013). Importance of KAIZEN con-
cept in medium manufacturing enterprises. International Journal of Management and Strategy,
4(6), 234–245.
Chan, F. T. S., Lau, H. C. W., Ip, R. W. L., Chan, H. K., & Kong, S. (2005). Implementation of
total productive maintenance: A case study. International Journal of Production Economics,
95(1), 71–94.
Chandrasekaran, M., Kannan, S., & Pandiaraj, P. (2008). Quality improvement in automobile
assembly production line by using Kaizen. Manufacturing Technology Today, 7(3), 33–38.
Chang, R. (1995). Core threads of continuous improvement. Management Development Review,
8(4), 14–16.
Chapman, R.  L., & Hyland, P.  W. (1997). Continuous improvement strategies across selected
manufacturing sector. Benchmarking for Quality Management and Technology, 4(3), 175–188.
Chase, R. B., & Stewart, D. M. (1994). Make your service fail-safe. Sloan Management Review,
35(3), 35–44.
Chaudhari, S. (1997). Kaizen at Morris electronics: Key to competitive success. Portland interna-
tional conference on management and technology, Portland, p. 365.
Chen, C.  I., & Wu, C.  W. (2004). A new focus on overcoming the improvement failure.
Technovation, 24, 585–591.
Chen, J. C., Dugger, J., & Hammer, B. (2000). A KAIZEN based approach for cellular manufactur-
ing design: A case study. The Journal of Technology Studies, 27(2), 19–27.
Cheng, J. L. (2008). Implementing six sigma via TQM improvement: an empirical study of Taiwan.
The TQM Journal, 20(3), 182–195.
Chengalvarayn, G., & Parker, S.  C. (1991). Simulation analysis of just in time feasibility in a
manufacturing environment. Computer Industrial Engineering, 21(14), 303–306.
Cheser, R. N. (1998). The effect of Japanese KAIZEN on employee motivation in US manufactur-
ing. International Journal Organizational Analysis, 6(3), 197–212.
Chin, K., Wang, Y., Poon, G. K. K., & Yang, J. (2009). Failure mode effect analysis using a group-­
based evidential reasoning approach. Computer and Operations Research, 36(1), 1768–1779.
Cook, E., & Dale, B. G. (1995). Organization of continuous improvement: An examination. The
TQM Magazine, 7(1), 7–13.
Davenport, T. H., & Short, J. E. (1990). The new industrial engineering: Information technology
and business process redesign. Sloan Management Review, 31(4), 11–27.
Dehghan, R., Zohrab, M., Momeni, A., & Hoseini, M. (2006). Continuous improvement approach
in the agriculture sector. Asian Pacific Productivity Conference, Seoul National University,
South Korea.
Deming, W.  E. (1995). The new economics for industry government and education (2nd ed.).
Combridge, MA: MIT Press.
Desai, T. N., & Shrivastava, R. L. (2008). Six Sigma—A new direction to quality and productivity
management. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science, San
Fransisco, USA.
Deshmukh, S.  V., & Chavan, A. (2012). Six Sigma and SMEs: A critical review of literature.
International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 3(2), 157–167.
Deshmukh, S.  V., & Lakhe, R.  R. (2010). Six Sigma awareness in Central Indian SMEs.
International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, 5(2), 200–212.
Dhongade, P.  M., Singh, M., & Stouty, V.  A. (2013). A review: Literature survey for the
Implementation of Kaizen. International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology,
3(1), 57–60.
Dixon, N. (1994). The organizational learning cycle: How we can learn collectively, developing
organizations series. London: McGraw-Hill.
126 Bibliography

Dogra, M., Sharma, V. S., Sachdeva, A., & Dureja, J. S. (2011). TPM-A key strategy for produc-
tivity improvement in process industry. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 6(1),
1–16.
Doolen, T. L., June, W. Q., Akan, V., Eileen, M., & Jennifer, F. (2003). Development of an assess-
ment approach for KAIZEN Events. Proceedings of the 2003 Industrial Engineering and
Research Conference, CD-ROM.
Dulhai, G. (2008). The 5S strategy for continuous improvement of the manufacturing processes in
Autocar Exhaust. Management and Marketing, 3(4), 115–120.
Dwyer, J. (2006). Seeing is believing. Works Management, 59(10), 54–57.
Elmuti, D., & Kathawala, Y. (1997). An overview of benchmarking process: A tool for continu-
ous improvement and competitive advantage. Benchmarking for Quality Management and
Technology, 4(4), 229–243.
Erlandson, R. F., Noblett, M. J., & Phelps, J. A. (1998). Impact of poka-yoke device on job per-
formance of individuals with cognitive impairments. IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation
Engineering, 6(3), 269–276.
Farris, J. A., VanAken, E. M., Doolen, T. L., & June, W. (2009). Critical success factor human
resource outcome in Kaizen event: An Empirical study. International Journal of Production
Economics, 117(1), 42–65.
Gallagher, M., Austin, S., & Caffyn, S. (1997). Continuous improvement in action: The journey of
eight companies. London: Kogan Page.
Gapp, R., Fisher, R., & Kobayash, K. (2008). Implementing 5S within a Japanese context: an inte-
grated management system. Management Decisions, 46(4), 565–579.
Garcia-Lorenzo, A., Prado, J., & Arca, J. G. (2000). Continuous improvement and employee par-
ticipation in SMEs. The TQM Magazine, 12(4), 290–294.
Ghalayani, A. M., Noble, J. S., & Crowe, T. J. (1997). An integrated dynamic performance mea-
surement system for improving manufacturing competitiveness. International Journal of
Production Economics, 48(2), 20–25.
Gibb, A., & Davies, L. (1990). In pursuit of frameworks for the development of growth models of
the small business. International Small Business Journal, 9(1), 15–31.
Gonsalves, G. C. (2002). Business process management: Integration of quality management and
reengineering for enhanced competitiveness. Pro Quest Information and Learning Company,
7(1), 120–128.
Goriwondo, W. M., Mhlanga, S., & Kazembe, T. (2011). Optimizing a production system using
tools of total productive maintenance: Datlabs pharmaceuticals as a case study. Proceedings of
the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Kuala
Lumpur, Malaysia.
Granja, D. A., Picchi, F. A., & Robert, G. T. (2005). Target and Kaizen costing in construction.
Proceedings IGLC-13, Sydney, Australia, pp. 227–233.
Grunberg, T. (2003). A review of improvement methods in manufacturing operations. Work Study,
52(2), 89–93.
Gunasekaran, A., Korukonda, A.  R., Virtanen, I., & Yli-Olli, P. (1994). Improving productivity
and quality in manufacturing organizations. International Journal of Production Economics,
36(2), 169–183.
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1980). Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1994). Competing for the future. Boston, MA: Harvard Business
School Press.
Hammer, M., Champy, J., & Tathan, R. L. (1993). Reengineering the corporation: A manifesto for
business revolution. New York: Harper Collins.
Harrington, H. J. (1995). Continuous versus breakthrough Improvement: finding the right answer.
Business Process Reengineering and Management Journal, 1(3), 31–49.
Hongming, H., Sun, H., & Xu, Y. (2000). An empirical study on quality management practices in
Shinghai manufacturing industries. Total Quality Management, 11(8), 1111–1122.
Bibliography 127

Huang, P. Y., Rees, P. L., & Taylor, B. W. (1983). A simulation analysis of Japanese JIT for a multi-­
machine, multistage production system. Decision Science, 14(2), 326–343.
Hyland, P., Mellor, R., Omara, E., & Kondepndi, R. (2000). A comparison of Australian firms and
their use of continuous improvement tools. The TQM Magazine, 12(2), 117–124.
Imai, M. (1986). KAIZEN: The key to Japan’s competitive success. New York: McGraw Hill.
Imai, M. (1997). Gemba Kaizen: A commonsense, low cost approach to management. New York:
McGraw Hill.
Ionica, A. C., Leba, M., & Corbu, C. (2013). Professional Development—Between Reengineering
and Continuous Improvement. 2nd World Conference on Educational Technology
Researches—WCETR2012.
Irane, Z., & Sharp, J. M. (1997). Integrating continuous improvement and innovation into a corpo-
rate culture: a case study. Technovation, 17(4), 225–226.
Jaca, C., Viles, E., Mateo, R., & Santos, J. (2012). Components of sustainable improvement sys-
tems: theory and practices. The TQM Journal, 24(2), 142–154.
Jager, B., Minnie, C., Jager, J., Welgemoed, M., Bessant, J., & Francis, D. (2004). Enabling con-
tinuous improvement: a case study of implementation. Journal of Manufacturing Technology
Management, 15(4), 315–324.
Jayaraman, A., Green, J. A., & Gunal, A. K. (1995). Continuous improvement applied to simula-
tion modeling: A case study. Proceedings of winter simulation conference, Arlington, USA,
pp. 930–935.
Jha, S., Michela, J., & Noori, H. (1999). Within the Canadian boundaries: A close look at Canadian
Industries implementing continuous improvement. The TQM Magazine, 11(3), 188–197.
Jha, S., Noori, H., & Michela, J. (1996). The dynamics of continuous improvement. International
Journal of Quality Science, 1(1), 19–47.
Jonsdottir, S., Ingason, H. I., & Jonasson, H. I. (2014). Continuous improvement projects in certi-
fied organizations in Iceland: traditional projects or not? Social and Behavioral Sciences, 119,
142–151.
Jorgensen, F., Boer, H., & Gertsen, F. (2003). Jump-starting continuous improvement through
self-assessment. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 23(10),
1260–1278.
Jung, J. Y., Wang, Y. J., & Wu, S. (2009). Competitive strategy, TQM practice, and Continuous
Improvement of international project management. International Journal of Quality and
Reliability Management, 26(2), 164–183.
Kanji, G.  K., & Asher, M. (1996). 100 Methods for total quality management. London: Sage
Publications.
Karkoszka, T., & Szewieczek, D. (2007). Risk of the processes in the aspect of quality, natural
environment and occupational safety. Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing
Engineering, 20(3), 539–542.
Kaskhedikar, K., & Katore, H.  V. (2013). Improvement of quality and productivity in casting
industries. Mechanica Confab, 2(3), 63–71.
Kaushik, P. (2012). Relevance of six sigma line of attack in SMEs: A case study of a die casting
manufacturing unit. Journal of Engineering and Technology, 1(2), 107–112.
Kaye, M., & Anderson, R. (1999). Continuous improvement: The ten essential criteria. International
Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 16(5), 485–506.
Kaye, M. M., & Dyason, M. D. (1995). The fifth era. The TQM Magazine, 7(1), 33–37.
Kelle, P., & Schneider, H. (1992). Extension of a reliability-type inventory model to just in time
systems. International Journal of Production Economics, 26(1), 319–326.
Ketokivi, M. A., & Schroeder, R. G. (2004). Perceptual measures of performance: Fact or fiction.
Journal of Operations Management, 22, 247–262.
Khan, I.  A. (2011). KAIZEN: The Japanese strategy for continuous improvement. VSRD
International Journal of Business and Management Research, 1(3), 177–184.
Khanna, V.  K. (2009). 5S and TQM status in Indian organization. The TQM Journal, 21(5),
486–501.
128 Bibliography

Kikuchi, K., Kikuchi, T., & Takai, T. (2007). Method of overall consumable effectiveness. IEEE
International symposium on semiconductor manufacturing, Santa Clara, USA, pp. 1-4.
Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (1999). Strategy, value innovation and the knowledge economy.
Sloan Management Review, Spring, 41–54.
Koskela, L. (1999). Management of production in construction: a theoretical view. Proceedings
of seventh annual conference of the International Group for lean Construction, University of
California, CA, pp. 241–252.
Kossoff, L. L. (1993). Total quality or total chaos? HR Magazine, 38(4), 131–134.
Lawler, E. E. (1991). High involvement management. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Lawrence, J. L. (1999). Use mathematical modeling to give your TPM implementation effort an
extra boost. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 5(1), 62–69.
Lee, M. (2000). Customer service excellence through people motivation and Kaizen. IEE Seminar,
Kaizen: from understanding to action (Ref. No. 2000/035), 5, pp. 1–21.
Lee, S. S., Dugger, J. C., & Chen, J. C. (2000). Kaizen: An essential tool for inclusion in industrial
technology curricula. Journal of Industrial Technology, 16(1), 1–7.
Leede, J. D., & Looise, J. K. (1999). Continuous improvement and the mini-company concept.
International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 19(11), 1188–1202.
Leem, C. S., & Kim, J. (2004). An integrated evaluation system based on the continuous improve-
ment model of IS performance. Industrial Management and Data System, 104(2), 115–128.
Lillrank, P. (1995). The transfer of management innovations from Japan. Organization Studies,
16(6), 971–989.
Lillrank, P., & Kano, N. (1989). Continuous Improvement—quality control circles in Japanese
Industry. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
Lixia, R.  E., & Bo, M. (2008). Implementing 5S to Chinese Enterprise. Journal of Operations
Management, 24(5), 29–47.
Ljungstrom, M. (2005). A mode for starting up and implementing continuous improvement and
work development in practice. The TQM Magazine, 17(5), 385–405.
Locke, E.  A., & Jain, V.  K. (1995). Organizational learning and continuous improvement. The
International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 3(1), 45–68.
Love, P. E. D., Gunasekaran, A., & Li, H. (1999). Improving the competitiveness of manufacturing
companies by continuous incremental change. The TQM Magazine, 10(3), 177–185.
Macbeth, D.  K. (1987). Supplier management in support of JIT activity: A research agenda.
International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 7(4), 53–63.
Mackle, K. (2000). A frame work for implementation of Kaizen management system audit. IEE
Seminar, Kaizen: from understanding to action (Ref. No. 2000/035), 3, pp.1-6.
Malik, S. A., Li-bin, L., YeZhuang, T., & Xiao-lin, S. (2007) Continuous improvement practices
in Asian developing countries: A comparative analysis between Chinese and Pakistani manu-
facturing industry. 14th International conference on management science and engineering,
Harbin, P.R. China, pp. 692–697.
Malik, S. A., & YeZhuang, T. (2006). Execution of continuous improvement practices in Spanish
and Pakistani industry: A comparative analysis. IEEE International Conference on Management
of Innovation and Technology, Singapore, 2, pp. 761–765.
Mandal, A., & Deshmukh, S. G. (1994). Vendor selection using interpretive structural modelling
(ISM). International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 14(6), 52–59.
Marin-Garcia, J. A., Val, M. P., & Martin, T. B. (2008). Longitudinal study of the results of contin-
uous improvement in an industrial company. Team Performance Management, 14(1/2), 56–69.
Martin, D. (1993). Toward Kaizen: The quest for quality improvement. Library Management,
14(4), 4–12.
Matsui, Y. (2007). An empirical analysis of just in time production in Japanese manufacturing
companies. International Journal of Production Economics, 108(1), 153–164.
McAdam, R., Stevenson, P., & Grem, A. (2000). Innovation change management in SMEs: Beyond
continuous improvement. Logistics Information Management, 13(3), 138–149.
Bibliography 129

Michalska, J., & Szewieczek, D. (2007). The 5S methodology as a tool for improving the organio-
sation. Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, 24(2), 211–214.
Monden, Y. (1998). Toyota production system: An integrated approach to just-in-time (3rd ed.).
Routledge, London: Industrial Engineering and Management Press.
Montabon, F. (2005). Using Kaizen events for back office processes: The recruitment of frontline
supervisor co-ops. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 16(10), 1139–1147.
Mora, E. (2002). The right ingredients for a successful TPM or lean implementation (2nd ed.).
New York, NY: Industrial Press.
Motwani, J.  (2001). Critical factors and performance measures of TQM. The TQM Magazine,
13(4), 292–300.
Moubray, J. (1997). Reliability centered maintenance (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Industrial Press.
Nakajima, S. (1988). Introduction to TPM. Cambridge, MA: Productivity Press.
Natarajan, M., Senthil, V., Devadasan, S. R., & Mohan, N. V. (2011). QUARNEWSS: A model
for applying six sigma framework to achieve continuous quality and reliability improvement
in new product development. International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management,
7(1), 44–73.
Newitt, D. J. H. (1996). Beyond BPR and TQM- managing the processes: Is Kaizen enough? In
Proceedings Industrial Engineering, London, Institution of Electric Engineers, pp. 1–5.
Oakley, J. (1996). Communicating for competitive advantage: A continuous improvement model.
Journal of Communication Management, 1(2), 169–173.
Ohno, T. (1988). Toyota production system: Beyond large-scale production. Cambridge, MA:
Productivity Press.
Oliver, N. (1990). The dynamic of just in time. New Technology Work and Employment, 3(2),
19–27.
Oprime, P. C., Mendes, G. H., & Pimenta, M. L. (2012). Continuous improvement: Critical fac-
tors in Brazilian industrial companies. International Journal of Productivity and Performance
Management, 61(1), 69–92.
Osada, T. (1991). The 5-S: Five keys to a total quality environment. Tokyo: Asian Productivity
Organization.
Palmer, V. S. (2001). Inventory management Kaizen. Proceedings 2nd International Workshop on
Engineering Management for Applied Technology, Austin, pp. 55–56.
Park, K. S., & Han, S. W. (2001). TPM—total productive maintenance: Impact on competitive-
ness and a framework for successful implementation. Human Factors and Ergonomics in
Manufacturing, 11(4), 321–338.
Pranckevicius, D., Diaz, D. M., & Gitlow, H. (2008). A lean six sigma case study: An application
of the ‘5S’ technique. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 5(1), 63–79.
Radharamanan, R., Godoy, L.  P., & Watanabe, K.  I. (1996). Quality and productivity improve-
ment in a custom-made furniture industry using Kaizen. Computer and Industrial Engineering,
31(1/2), 471–474.
Ramayan, T., Jantan, M., & Hassan, M. M. (2002). Change management and implementation of
total productive maintenance: An exploratory study of Malaysian manufacturing companies.
Change Management, 3(1), 35–49.
Reid, R.  A. (2006). Productivity and quality improvement: An implementation framework.
International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, 1(1/2), 26–36.
Robinson, A. G. (1991). continuous improvement in operations —a systematic approach to waste
reduction. Cambridge, MA: Productivity Press.
Rusiniak, S. (1996). Maximizing your IE value. Industrial Engineer, 28(6), 12–16.
Sabhu, R. U., & Dalu, R. S. (2011). Six Sigma implementation in Indian medium scale automotive
enterprises—a review and agenda for future research. International Journal of Six Sigma and
Competitive Advantage, 6(3), 224–247.
Salah, S., Rahim, A., & Carretero, J. A. (2010). The integration of six sigma and lean management.
International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 1(3), 249–274.
130 Bibliography

Saleem, M., Khan, N., Hameed, S., & Ch, M. A. (2012). An analysis of relationship between total
quality management and TQM. Life Science Journal, 9(3), 31–40.
Sankar, N. R., & Prabhu, B. S. (2001). Modified approach for prioritization of failures in a system
failure mode and effects analysis. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management,
18(3), 324–335.
Santos, A., Powell, J. A., & Formoso, C. T. (2000). Setting stretch targets for driving continuous
improvement in construction: analysis of Brazilian Company. Work Study, 49(2), 50–58.
Savino, M. M., & Mazza, A. (2014). Toward environmental and quality sustainability-an integrated
approach for continuous improvement. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 61,
28–34.
Savolainen, T.  I. (1999). Cycles of continuous improvement: Realizing competitive advantage
through quality. International Journal of Operation and Production Management, 19(11),
1203–1222.
Schroeder, R.  G. (1993). Operations management: Decision making in the operations function
(4th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Seaker, R., & Waller, M. A. (1996). The common thread in TQM, empowerment, reengineering
and continuous improvement. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management,
13(1), 24–31.
Setijono, D. (2010). Model and principles of stakeholders-oriented quality management based
on radical (discontinuous) improvement—a modern re-interpretation of TQM and CWQC?
International Journal of Quality and Innovation, 1(1), 167–183.
Shaari, J. A. N. (2010). Barriers to implement TQM in Japanese way: a study on companies in
Malaysia. International Review of Business Research Papers, 6(5), 400–410.
Sharma, R.  K., Kumar, D., & Kumar, P. (2006). Manufacturing excellence through TPM
­implementation: a practical analysis. Industrial Management & Data System, 106(2), 256–280.
Sheridan, J. H. (1997). Kaizen Blitz. Industry Week, 246(16), 18–27.
Shingeo, S. (1988). Non-stock production: The shingo system for continuous improvement.
Cambridge, MA: Productivity Press.
Shingo, S. (1985). A Revolution in manufacturing: The SMED System. Andrew Oillon: Productivity
Press.
Siekman, P. (2002). Pentair fixes its own mess. Fortune, 146(6), 156–160.
Sim, K. L., & Rogers, J. W. (2009). Implementing lean production systems: barriers to change.
Management Research News, 32(1), 37–49.
Singh, B., & Khanduja, D. (2010). SMED for quick changeover in foundry SMEs. International
Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 59(1), 98–116.
Singh, H., & Khamba, J. S. (2010). An empirical examination for enhancing the utilization level of
advanced manufacturing technologies in India. Journal of Advances in Management Research,
7(1), 112–126.
Soderquist, K. (1996). Managing innovation in SMES: A comparison of companies in UK, France
and Portugal. International Journal of Technology Management, 12(3), 291–305.
Sohal, A. S., & Terzioviski, M. (2000). TQM in Australian manufacturing: factors critical to suc-
cess. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 17(2), 158–167.
Sokovic, M., Pavletic, D. & Fakin, S. (2005). Application of Six Sigma methodology for pro-
cess design quality improvement. 13th International scientific conference on achievements in
mechanical and material engineering, Poland, pp. 611–614.
Soti, A., Kaushal, O. P., & Shankar, R. (2011). Modeling the barriers of six sigma using interpre-
tive structural modeling. International Journal of Business Excellence, 4(1), 94–110.
Starkey, K., & Mackinlay, A. (1993). Ford and the search for competitive advantage, strategy and
the human resource. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sushil, X. (1999). Flexibility in management, global institute of flexible systems management,
New Delhi.
Suzaki, K. (1987). The new manufacturing challenge-Techniques of manufacturing systems.
New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc..
Bibliography 131

Tahla, M. (2004). TQM-An overview. The Bottom Line: Managing Library Finances, 17(1), 15–19.
Tanik, M. (2010). Improving ‘order handling’ process by using QFD and FMEA methodologies:
a case study. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 27(4), 404–423.
Teian, K. (1992). Guiding continuous improvement through employee suggestions. Portland, OR:
Productivity Press.
Teng, S. G., Ho, S. M., Shumal, D., & Liu, P. C. (2006). Implementing FMEA in a collaborat-
ing supply chain environment. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management,
23(2), 179–196.
Terziovski, M. (2001). The effect of continuous improvement and innovation management prac-
tices on small to medium performance. Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Quality
and Innovation Management, Euro-Australian Co-operation Centre for Global Management,
pp. 1–22.
Terziovski, M. (2002). Achieving performance excellence through an integrated strategy of radical
innovation and continuous improvement. Measuring Business Excellence, 6(2), 5–14.
Terziovski, M., & Power, D. (2007). Increasing ISO 9000 certification benefits: A continuous
improvement approach. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 24(2),
141–163.
Terziovski, M., & Sohal, A. S. (2000). The adoption of continuous improvement and innovation
strategies in Australian manufacturing firms. Technovation, 20(10), 539–550.
Thakkar, J., Kanda, A., & Deshmukh, S.  G. (2008). Interpretive structural modeling (ISM) of
IT-enablers for Indian manufacturing SMEs. Information Management & Computer Security,
16(2), 113–136.
Tomlinson, Y. (1994). Involving staff in the process of continuous improvement. Training for
Quality, 2(3), 22–25.
Tonnessen, T. (2005). Continuous innovation through wide employee participation. The TQM
Magazine, 17(2), 195–207.
Tsang, J. H. Y., & Antony, J. (2001). Total quality management in UK service organizations: Some
key findings from a survey. Managing Service Quality, 11(2), 132–141.
Tseng, M. L., Chiu, A. S. F., & Chinag, J. H. (2006). The relationship of continuous improvement
and cleaner production on operational performance: An empirical study in electronic manufac-
turing firms, Taiwan, China. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering
Management, 1(1), 71–80.
Van Der Wal, R. W. E., & Lynne, D. (2002). Total productive maintenance in a South African pulp
and paper company: A case study. The TQM Magazine, 14(6), 359–366.
Vassie, L. (1998). A proactive team-based approach in health and safety management. Employee
Relations, 20(6), 577–593.
Walsh, A., Hughes, H., & Maddox, D. P. (2002). Total quality management continuous improve-
ment: Is the philosophy a reality. Journal of European Industrial Training, 26(6), 299–307.
Warfield, J.  W. (1974). Developing interconnected matrices in structural modelling. IEEE
Transcript on Systems, Men and Cybernetics, 4(1), 51–81.
Watson, M. (1986). The deming management method. New York, NY: Perigee Books.
Watson, R. M. (1998). Implementing self managed process improving team in continuous improve-
ment environment. The TQM Magazine, 10(4), 246–257.
Wemmerlov, U., & Hyer, N. (1989). Cellular manufacturing in US industry: A survey of users.
International Journal of Production Research, 27(9), 1511.
Werner, K. (1994). Act and think to create the learning organization of the 1990’s. European
Management Journal, 12(3), 11–31.
Wickens, P. D. (1990). Production management: Japanese and British approaches. IEE Proceedings
A, Science, Measurement and Technology, 137(1), 52–54.
Williams, M. (2001). Maximum cost reduction minimum effort. Manufacturing Engineer, 80(4),
179–182.
Williamson, A. (1997). Target and Kaizen costing. Manufacturing Engineer, 76(1), 22–24.
132 Bibliography

Wittenberg, G. (1994). Kaizen-The many ways of getting better. Assembly Automation, 14(4),
12–17.
Womack, J. P., & Jones, D. T. (1996). Lean thinking. New York: Simon &Schuster.
Woods, J. (1997). The six values of a quality culture. National Productivity Review, 16(2), 49–54.
Yamashina, H. (1995). Japanese manufacturing strategy and the role of total productive mainte-
nance. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 1(1), 27–38.
Yang, C., Lin, W., Lin, M., & Huang, J. (2006). A study on applying FMEA to improving ERP
introduction: An example of semiconductor related industries in Taiwan. International Journal
of Quality and Reliability Management, 23(3), 298–322.
Yang, J., Huang, H., He, L., Zhu, S., & Wen, D. (2011). Risk evaluation in failure mode and effect
analysis of aircraft turbine rotor blades using Dempster—shafer evidence theory under uncer-
tainty. Engineering Failure Analysis, 18(1), 2084–2092.
Yan-jiang, C., Dan, W., & Lang, X. (2006). Influencing factors of continuous improvement and
tendency to change. IEEE International conference on management of innovation and technol-
ogy, vol. 1, Singapore, PP. 181–185.
Yan-jiang, C., Lang, X. & Xiao-na, W. (2006). Empirical study of influencing factors of continu-
ous improvement. International conference on management science and engineering, Lille,
France, PP. 577–581.
Yeo, C.  H., Goh, T.  N., & Xia, M. (1995). A positive management orientation for continuous
improvement. IEEE Conference on Engineering Management, pp. 208–213.
Yoo, S. H., Kim, D., & Park, M. (2012). Inventory models for imperfect production and inspection
processes with various inspection options under one-time and continuous improvement invest-
ment. Computer and Operations Research, 39(2), 2001–2015.
Yung, W. K. C. (1996). An integrated model for manufacturing process improvement. Journal of
Materials Processing Technology, 61(1), 39–43.
Zeleny, M. (1982). Multiple criteria decision making. New York: McGraw Hill.
Zhang, Z., & Chu, X. (2011). Risk prioritization in failure mode effect analysis under uncertainty.
Expert Systems and Applications,., 38(1), 206–214.

You might also like