Strandtmann & Wharton (1958) Manual of Mesostigmatid Mites
Strandtmann & Wharton (1958) Manual of Mesostigmatid Mites
Strandtmann & Wharton (1958) Manual of Mesostigmatid Mites
-^t-"’
"-w?"
MANUAL OF MESOSTIGMATID
MITES
R. W. STRANDTMANN
&
G. W. WHARTON
MAY 9 1960
^
A MANUAL OF MESOSTIGMATID MITES
PARASITIC ON VERTEBRATES
by
R. W. Strandtroann
Texas Technological College, Lubbock, Texas
and
G. W. Wharton
University of Maryland, College Park, .Maryland
Contribution No. 4
of
THE INSTITUTE OF ACAROLOGY
Department of Zoology
University of Maryland
College Park
20 December 1958
This investigation was supported by the Medical Research and Develop-
ment Board, Office of the Surgeon General, Department of the Army,
under Contract No. DA-49-007-MD-501 with the University of Maryland.
It was edited and published with the aid of National Science Foundation
Grant NSP-G4561.
ii
PREFACE
R. W. Strandtmann
G. W. Wharton
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION Page 1
,
Medical and Economic Importance 3
Control............................ 5 .
Dermanyssidae. 13
Laelaptidae ................ 13 Longevity .................. 14
ANATOMY Page 15
Segmentation ............... .15 _ Internal Anatomy ........... 18
External Anatomy ........... 15 The Life Stages ............ 23
’
CLASSIFICATION Page 26
The Parasitic Mespstigmatid Mites ..... 27
^ Key to the Families of Parasitoidea ..... 28
,
Plate -No’.
Tritosterna. . . . . . . . . . .
Eemale chelae . . . . . . . . . . .
. 1. ...
.,... . . .’
. . .
. . . .: .
Digestive system . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..;...’...
Side .view of gnathosoma of Haemolaelaps glas-
’
Sectional view. of a male gamasid mite (Neonyssus
melloi) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ambulacrum of tarsus I of two snake mites . .’.. .’.
Diagrammatic sketch showing the respiratory sys-
tem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .’;. ...".’
Sectional view.showing internal organs of a female
gamasid.mite (Neonyssus melloi) . . . . . . ’.’...;.. 4
Laelaps nuttalli (.larva) . . . . . . ...
. . . . . . .
Haemolaelaps .glasgowi (protonymph) . . . . . . .
5
6
Haemolaelaps .glasgowi (deutonymph) . . . .’. ,-’.? 6
Echinolaelaps .echidninus (female) , . . . . . . .. 7
Echinolaelaps .echidninus (male) ...’.’.’. . . . . . . .’
Types of male chelae . . . . . s ’s. ._.. . . .
Haemolaelaps glasgowi . . . . . ."’ . . . .
. .
:,: .-. .
...
7
8
9
’
Mesolaelaps anomalus ..
: . , ; /.’.. .
,; .:..:,; .:...... ’ 16
Heterolaeiaps antipodianus . , . . , . . . :. ’. . . ’»’ 1&
Tricholaelaps .comatus , . .
, ’.^:.;;; , . . . . ... 17
Tri.chosu.rolaelaps.crassipes . . . . . . . . . . . .’ : 17
Steptolaelags heteroniys < . . . ..;;.
j :. ...
. . 18-.
i .
Laelaps nuttalli , . , . .
. . , . . . .’J. ’,’-1 . . 19’’
i
’
45. Neoichoronyssus werneoki........... . . . . . . ..32-
46. Patrinyssus hubbardi. . . .........
47. Echinonyssus nasutus . . .. . . . .
. .: . . . . . .
. . . . . . .
33-
34’
’
35
’
51. Neolaelaps rnagnistigmatus . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
52. Steal onyssus joaquimi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
’
’
60. Haem’ogamas’us keegani . ...
59. Eulaelaps stabolaris . . . . . . . . .
. . .
61. Brevisterna morlani . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . .’.
. . . . . . .
. . . ... .
43
44
45
’
..
67. Manitherionyssus- heterotarsus . . .
68. Dasyporiyssus’ neivai . . . . . . .
. . , ...
...
. . . ..
. . . .,. . .
....
.
48
49
50
’
’
69. Entonyssus heterodontus.. . . . . . . . . . . .., . 50
’
70. Halarachne aftiericana . . . . . . . . . . . . . , .’ 51
71. Orthohalarachne attenuata . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
72. Pneumonyssus simieola . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52
73. RhinopRaga p’apionis . , . . . . . . . . . . ... . .’ 52
74. Pneurnonyssoides caninum.. . ..
. . . . . . . . . 53
75. Rhinonyssus coniventpis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
76. Larmyssus orblcularis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
77. Ratlinyssus caudistignaus . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
’
78. Neon’yssus zenaidurae . . . . , , . . , . . . . . . 56
-
79. RhinoeciuS co-oremani . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
80. Sternostbrha boydi . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
81. Cas angrensis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
82. Ptilonyssoides triscutatus . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
83. Tinamiriyfesus trappi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
84. Flavionyssus rabelloi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
Fig. 85. Rochanyssus werneri . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
Pig. 86. Travanyssus paranensia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
Fig. 87. Bhinonyssoides donatoi. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
Fig. 88. Vitznyssus sp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
Fig. 89. Paraneonyssus hirsti . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
Fig. 90. Ptilonyssus nudus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
Fig. 91. Spinturnix iiiyoti . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
Fig. 92. Periglischrus strandtmanni . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
Fig. 93. Acaathochela chilensia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68
Fig. 94. Alphalaelaps aplodontiae. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68
Pig. 95. Myonyssoides spiaosus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69
Pig. 96. Ugandolaelaps protoxera. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69
INTRODUCTION
Suborder Mesostigmata
Supercohort Monogynaspida Camin and Gorirossi. 1955
Cohort Liroaspina Tragardh. 1946
Superfamily Liroaspoidea Tragardh, 1946
Superfamily Microgynioidea Tragardh, 1942
Cohort Gamasina Leach, 1815
Superfamily Zerconoldea Tragardh. 1944
Superfamily Parasitoidea Banks, 1915
Cohort Uropodina Kramer, 1881
Superfamily Uropodoidea Kramer, 1881
Superfamily Trachytoidea Tragardh, 1937
Superfamily Diarthrophalloidea Tragardh, 1946
Supercohort Trigynaspida Camin and Gorirossi, 1955
Cohort Antennophorina Camin and Gorirossi, 1955
Superfainily Celaenopsoidea Tragardh, 1938
Superfamily Megisthanoidea Tragardh, 1943
Superfainily Antennophoroidea Camin and Gorirossi, 1955
Superfamily Fedrizzioidea Tragardh, 1937
Cohort Cercomegistina Camin and Gorirossi, 1955
Supertamily Cercomegistoidea Camin and Gorirossi, 1955
Control
BEHAVIOR
LIFE CYCLES
Dermanyssidae
averaged 2 ,- 5 eggs after a complete feeding. The entire cycle from the
initial feeding of the female to another generation of females can be
accomplished in as little as 5 - 7 days. No differences were noted in
the life cycles of Ornithonyssus bursa and Ornithonyssus sylvia.rum.
0. sylviarum is smaller in ..ail} stages; this .is most marked in adults.
Dermanyssus gallinae. Wood(191"7) gives an excellent account of
the life cycle of this common fowl mite. At a mean temperature between
75F and 85P the egg to egg cycle may be accomplished in as little as
nine days. This has been verified by Wisseman and Sulkin (1947) and
Sike sand Chamberlain (1954). The average egg to egg interval is around
12 - 13 days. The stages, as in Ornithonyssus and Ophionyssus, con-
sist of egg, larva, protonympb. deutonymph and adult. Unlike these two
genera, the deutonymph of Permanyssus is an active stage and avidly
sucks blood. The adults will mate either before or after taking blood
..and probably several times. Wood reported ari average of about 40 eggs
per female laid in batches of 1 - 8 eggs through nine layings, each lay-
ing being preceded by a blood meal. Wisserriah’and Sulkin (1947) con-
, curred with Wood’s findings and agreed that’ in nature probably more
eggs than this ’.’ "
’’.
’
are produced.
AUodermanyssus sanguineus. Fuller ’(.19’54) obtained life history
data of this important vector of rickettsialp’ox. He found’the life’stages
to be: egg, larva, protonymph, deutonymph’.. and adult male anAfemale,
The larva does not feed, but the protonymph and deutonymph each teed
one’e’ between molts. At a temperature of 24" - 25C and an approxi-
mate relative humidity of 80 per cent the complete life cycle ranged
from 17 to 23 days, viz.: egg, 4" 5 days; larva, three days; protonymph,
i - 5 days; deutonymph, 6 - 10 days. Both sexes ingested xnuBaqpie blood
meals and survived’on an average from 51 to 63 days. The’post-T.arval
-
stages were fed by placing a single mite wi’th a 6 8 day old suckling
.white mouse in a cotton-plugged vial.
., .. Ophionyssus nat’ricis. The life cycle of ttie snake mite was beauti-
.
;,
’fully worked out by’Camin (1.953). The stages agree exactly ^with Ophio-
riyssus bacoti but feeding is much different. Whereas 0. bacoij .’attaches
and engorges within minutes, Ophionyssus natricis may take weeks to
become fully engorged. Unless disturbed, the mite remains attached
at one point until it is completely filled. The total number of eggs pro-
duced average about 80 per female. The eggs hatch in about 24 hours
at temperatures between 25 - 30C. The larvae molt to protonymphs
in 14 -30 hours. The highest per cent of moltings occur at relative
humidities between 75 per cent and 95 per cent. The protonymph en-
gorges completely in 3’- 7 days at 25C but may take as long as 6 - 21
days at 15C. After" repletion, ecdysis occurs in 12 to 48 hours, The
deutonymph, a non-feeding stage, lasts only 13 houys at 30C, but as
.’.long as two days at 15C.
’
-
15 22 eggs after a single feeding and will total as many as 80 eggs in
its lifetime, which is approximately 35 days. The egg to egg cycle under
optimum conditions <25C, 95 per cent relative humidity) is from 13 "
19 days. This mite, therefore, requires a lower temperature butbigber
relative humidity than the species of Ornithonyssus.
Laelaptidae
male chelae, forces -the sperm into the female genital tract. After this
is complete the male withdraws the empty sac and cleans his chelicerae.
The male may ride on the back of the female for a ti»e ’after coition,
or for a while before coition if the female is not ready to accept him.
Longevity
ANATOMY
’
Segmentation
External Anatomy
Gnathosoma. The gnathosoma is a cylindrical body attached sub-
terminally to the anterior end of the idiosoma and lying in the same plane
as the idiosoma. A segmented and movable palp arises from each side.
The region basad of these palps is known as the gnathosomai. base ring
(gbr. Fig. 1). This base ring encloses the chelicerae and includes the
fused palpal coxae, so that the moveable segments of the palp are: tro-
chsmter, femur, genu, tibia, and tarsus.
Extending forward from the base ring on the dorsal side is a mem-
brane of characteristic size and shape, the tectum (Fig. 2).
Distad of the base ring on the ventral side is the hypostome and its
associated structures (h. Fig. 1). The nypostome normally bears three
pairs of setae, known as hypostomal setae. These three plus the gnath-
osomai setae on the base ring make up the normal quota of four pairs
of setae on the ventral side of the gnathosoma. This number is fre-
quently less in the internal mites.
A median longitudinal, ventral band, or shallow groove, from the
base of the gnathosoma to the hypostome,is called the deutosternum (d.
Fig. 1). The deutosternum contains small structures called deutostemal
teeth (dst)Fig. 1). These may be arranged in single file or in combs.
16
The forward continuation of this groove is the protosternum (p, Fig. 1).
A pair of toothlike or hornshaped structures, the corniculi, termi-
nate the hypostome (c. Fig. 1). They are well developed in the Laelap-
tidae and Ixodorhynchidae but very poorly developed or lacking in the )
Dermanyssldae and the internal mites.
Projecting forward from the protosternum is a divided, serrate
structure, the hypopharyngeal process (hpp. Fig, 1). Ttv,s structure is
variable in size and shape and is rather difficult to see. -Dorsal to this
structure is a ciliated, generally pointed body, the epipharynx (e,,Fig. 1).
A pair of long, slender, very poorly, sclerotized structures are placed
between the hypo.stome and the palps. These are the salivary stylets
.(ss. Fig. 1). They are generally impossible to see because .they fold in
and lie behind the. epipharynx. In Ophiomegistus they are lacking.
Idiosoma. The idipsoma of the parasitic Gamasides AS generally
oval or elliptic in outline but it may also be almost circular, (Eubrachy-
laelaps) or conical (Rhinonyssus coniventris). It is never brpaderthan
long. The dorsum.is always strongly,,convex,:the venter only slightly
so. There is no sharp .
demarcation late rally, between dorsal and ven-
. -
.
.
tral sides.
^ ^
The coxae are all contiguous, with the occasional exception of coxa
I which may be slightly separated from the others.. ,Coxa I is cylindrical
and as long as or longer than wide. Coxae II.. Ill,, and IV are cup shaped
and wider than deep. The trochanter is attached to the coxa at-two ful-
cral points; mid-ventral and mid-do.raal, so that the leg moves-only
forward and backw,ard.qn the coxa. Up and down movements occur from
the trochanter out.
With the exception of Ophiomegistus, coxa I always has two setae,
both in the mid-ventral region, one apical and the other basal, but neither
one is on the extreme end. Coxa I of Ophiomegistus has three ventral
setae. Coxae II and III always have ..two setae each, one on the anterior
ventral margin, the other in the mid-posterior-ventral region.: Coxa IV
i
always has only one seta.. .It,is in the mid-ventral region just below the
point of articulation between the coxa and trochanter. Coxa II usually
has a triangular tooth projecting from the anterior margin (Fig. 37).
This is more pronounced in the Dermanyssidaethan in any other group.
Some species have one or more of the coxal setae thickened and spine-
like, and some may have accessory spurs or toothlike structures on the
coxae.
.
A bipartite structure, the tritosternum, (Fig. 3) originates mid-
ventrally between the. gnathospma and the. sternal-plate. This consists
of three parts: a short, undivided basal portion and two ciliated or fim-
briated arms. the lacinae.., In the Dermanyssidae there is always a
hyaline, denticulate membrane on each side of the basal portion. The
tritosternum is reduced to a small platelet in the Spinturnicidae and is
entirely lacking in most of the ..internal mites. Its function is unknown.
Other characteristics of the idiosoma are given under the various life
stages. .. .; .’
.
.
Integument. According to Vitzthum (1941), who quotes from other
17
Internal Anatomy
Endoskeleton. The Gamasina, along with many other mites, pos’
sessan "endostemum" which appears to be a tree plate inside the podo-
somal region and is the point of origin of the leg muscles, and of muscles
which go to the dorsal body wall. This plate seems to be entirely con-
nective tissue fibers. Stanley(1931)callsthisthe "endoskeletal fructule"
Occasionally one finds small, dense bodies internally near the bases
of the coxae. and also near the female genital atrium. These are prob-
ably structures from which muscles originate.
Musculature. Muscles ofthe parasitic Mesostigmatahave been only
slightly investigated. From what is known, it appears that most of the
muscles are flexors. Extensor and flexor muscles are found in the
chelicera so that the chela may be opened and closed, and both dilators
and constrictors are found in the pharynx, enabling the animal to suck
blood. There are also extensors in the tarsi to activate the claws and
ambulacral apparatus. All other parts of the body are extended by the
hydrostatic pressure of the body fluid. Apparently there are no muscles
directly associated with the digestive system (except the pharyngeal
muscles) and the movements of food must be accomplished by peristal-
tic action of the body. Although Stanley (1931) stated that the pharyn-
geal muscles of JEchinolaelags^edudninus are non-striated, more recent
studies show that all mite muscles, including the pharyngeal, are stri-
ated.
Digestive System. The digestive tract of the parasitic Gamasina is
a relatively simple thing. It consists of a pharynx, a thin walled esoph-
agus, a rather small midgut. tour large cecae, a small hindgut, the
rectal sac. and the anus (Fig. 5).
In common with all arachnids, the mouth is simple. It is merely an
anterior opening surrounded by a few modified parts, including the epi-
pharynx. hypopharynx and hypostomal processes (Fig. 6). Immediately
19
back of this opening is the pharynx with its several rows of constrictor
and dilator muscles. The chelicerae are modified appendages which
serve to puncture the host and cause blood or other body fluids to flow
to the surface. The epipharynx and hypostomal processes are appressed
to the wound and form a tight seal with tha host. The muscular pharynx
then pumps in the fluids as they accumulate at the surface.
Nearly all Mesostigmata have salivary glands which open through
the salivary stylets (Fig. 1). The saliva probably acts both as an anti-
coagulant and as a stimulant to blood flow.
The pharynx pumps the fluids through the esophagus into the midgut.
Four large diverticulae, or cecae, emerge laterally from. the midgut,
two curving anteriorly and two posteriorly. The anterior branches pro-
ceed partially into coxae II and then bend out again and enter coxae I.
The posterior branches go partially into coxae III and then proceed toward
each other at the posterior tip of the body. Crossley (1951, unpublished
data) has illustrated this very nicely (Fig. 5). Some species may have
small diverticulae in addition to the four large ones, or the large ones
may be branched. Michael (1892), in an excellent paper on internal
anatomy, found that females of Hae mogamasus hirsutus and Haemogama-
sus horridus had two pairs of anterior cecae and two pairs of posterior
cecae. The male of Haenaogamasus horridus, however, had only one
pair of posterior cecae.
The hindgut is a short tube which emerges from the midgut and
empties into the rectal sac. which in turn empties to the outside through
the anus. The anus is nearly always ventral near the posterior tip but
is occasionally exactly posterior (Sternostoma) and, rarely, even dorsal
(Hhinonyssus himantopus).
Circulatory System. The mites possess a circulating body fluid
containing cells of various kinds but not all of them have a circulating
device or heart. The ticks and many free-living Gamasina have a heart
dorsally located in the opisthosoma. According to Winlder (1888) such
a heart has a pair of ostia. and one aorta proceeding anteriorly. The
heart itself is roughly hexagonal and very small. However, a heart has
never been demonstrated in any species of parasitic Gamasina and they
are generally assumed to lack one. As in all arthropods, the blood cir-
culates in an "open" system. In parasitic Gamasina the body movements
are apparently sufficient to keep the blood circulating as much as is
necessary.
Excretory System. The excretory system of the Gamasina, inclu-
ding the parasitic forms, consists of two tubules reaching from coxae I
to the posterior end where they enter the rectal sac (see Vitzthum, 1941).
In cross section the tubule is seen to be composed of a single layer of
very large rhomboidal cells surrounding the central lumen. The cells
are so large that only three, rarely four or five, suffice to encircle the
central cavity. Anteriorly, the tubule extends into coxa I, sometimes
even into the femur, and occasionally as far as the genu. The whole
tubule is covered by a thin muscular sheath and the tubules exhibit peri-
staltic movements. The tubules are endodermal in origin and therefore
20
However, experimentation has shown that at least some species are able
to differentiate among lights of different intensity. Vitzthum (1941:244)
suggests that the dorsal ganglion may be directly stimulated by light
waves that pass through the overlying integument. He mentions tost
species with a heavily sclerotized dorsal plate, as in the genus Laelaps,
have a clear, or at least translucent, area immediately above the dor-
sal ganglion.
Camin (1953) has ingeniously shown that the snake mite, Ophionys-
sus natricis, has a pair of light sensitive spots in the pulvillar membrane
of tarsus I (a. Fig. 8). Leg I is not used in arobulation but is held aloft,
antenna-like, as the mite walks. In this position, the pulvillus is longi-
tudinally folded so that one light sensitive spot is on each side of the
fold. This enables the mite to detect with either leg whether the source
of light is from the left or the right.
A pair of small chitinized rings, each enclosing a very delicate
membrane, is present in the pulvillar membrane of tarsus I of some of
the internal snake mites of the family Entonyssidae <b. Fig. 8), These
have been dubbed "eye spots" because of their appearance but their actual
sensory nature has not been investigated.
It is interesting to speculate on the sensory adjustment that was
necessary in Ophionyssus natricis to make a pedal ganglion light sensi-
tive. As far as we know, light sensitivity is always associated with the
cerebral ganglion, never with the somatic ganglion as it must be in this
species. However, the possibility that these spots are actually heat
sensitive rather than light sensitive has not been ruled out.
The slitlike pores have been mentioned as a part of the integument;
they are again mentioned here because it has been suggested that they
may be sensory structures. This is credible because there is a nerve
to each pore. but what the nature of the sense may be is not known.
Vitzthum (1941) calls these pores "spaltorgane" and points out that they
are present not only on the sternal and dorsal plates but also on the
femora and tarsi of all the legs. They are located on the line that denotes
the division between the basi- and telofemur and between the basi- and
telotarsus. They are always present on the ventral side of the leg but
may be on the dorsal side also.
Respiratory System. The respiratory system of the Mesostigmata
consists of a pair of stigmal openings located one on each side between
legs III and IV. They are normally located ventrally but in the endo-
parasitic mites they may be lateral or even dorsal. Also, they may be
as far forward as coxae II (Ptilonyssus) or back near the posterior mar-
gin (Raillinyssus caudistigmus).
Interiorly the stigma opens into a very short trachea which branches
dichotomously, one branch going forward, the other back. The forward
branch very shortly branches again, one branch going ventrally and
supplying the first three pairs of legs and the gnathosoma, the other
going dorsally and supplying all the dorsal region that lies anterior
to the stigma. The posterior branch also branches quickly into ventral
and dorsal tubes, the ventral tube supplying leg IV and apparently all of
22
the opisthosoma, the dorsal tube apparently supplying only the mid-doraal
region. At least one branch of this dorsal tube seems to anastomose
with a similar branch from the other side (Fig. 9).
Running forward from the stigma is a prominent tube or depression
of unknown function known as the peritreme. This structure seems to
connect directly with the stigma. It is hollow, frequently chambered,
apparently has annular thickenings, and is fairly well sclerotized. It
generally extends forward to coxa I but may be longer or shorter. In
the internal mites it is always less than the diameter of a coxa in length;
in some genera (Sternostoma, Rhinonyssus) it is lacking entirely. It
is always short in the protonymph and completely absent in the larva.
Reproductive System. The parasitic Mesostigmata are dioecious
with apparent, though not exaggerated, dimorphism. All species that
have been studied are capable of parthenogenetic reproduction and this
capability probably extends to all species. Parthenogenesis always pro-
duces males, at least in the species whose life history is known, and
perhaps all males, even of fecundated females, are parthenogenetically
produced.
On the average, the ratio of malesto females is probably about equal
but the acarologist nearly always finds a preponderance of females in
any given habitat. This is probably because the male has a much shorter
life expectancy than the female. Mites of the genus Ptilonyssus are so
preponderantly female that some biologists have assumed that these
species produce females by parthenogenesis. However, males have
been found and although the possibility of parthenogenetic production of
females is not ruled out, it is more generally assumed that females are
produced from fecundated females.
Camin (1953) has indicated that the snake mite, Ophionyssus natri-
cis, has a reciprocal ratio of males and females. If the number of
males is low, many females fail to become fertilized and produce nothing
but males. This creates an overabundance of males and thus assures
a virtual absence of virgins in the next generation. Fertilized females
produce much higher than 50 per cent females so the next generation
will again be plagued with virgins, etc.
The male system (Pig. 7) consists of a single testis (or two fused
testes ?), two vasa deferentia, an accessory gland, and a single ejacu-
latory duct. The testis lie sin the middle of the opisthosoma and extends
from dorsal to ventral walls. It consists of relatively few very large
cells with the germinative area apparently at the posterior end. A short
vas deferens arises from each side anteriorly. The accessory gland
lies below the testis. The ejaculatory duct is medial and opens at the
anterior margin of the sternal plate. There is no penis. Spermato-
phoresare formed that are transferred on the chelae. How, and in what
part of the male system, the spermatophores are formed is not known,
Sperm of the Gamasina have seldom been seen. Vitzthum (1941:404).
quoting several authors, describes them as oval, elliptic, apindle-ahapsd
or spatulate bodies from three or four to 30 microns long. They lack a
flagellum (tail). They are probably transferred as immature sperm and
23
: The female system (Fig. 1.0.) consists of one ovary, a short oviduct,
uterus,, and-the genital pore. There is no vagina. The ovary is a com-
pact mass .at the posterior end of the body. .Only one egg or larva is
formed at ,a time .but this is of tremendous size, .frequently 1/4 the vol -
ume of the mite. The genital pore is a transverse opening just anterior
to legs IV. There seems to be no seminal receptacle but sperm are un-
doubtedly retained somewhere in the female system for some weeks after
copulation. Michael (1892) mentioned a central, domed cavity, anterior
and .dorsal to. the ovary, in Haemogamasus hirsutus. This he called the
camera spermatis because it contained sperm but was different in struc-
ture from, a .true receptaculum seminis.
. The life stages consist of egg, larva, protonymph (Nympha I), deu-
tonymph (Nympha 11). and adult female and male. .There/is no evidence
of a so-cap,edtritonymph. As far as is known, there is no resting stage,
orpseudocfarysalis, ;m any instar.. The larval form has six legs; the two
nymphal forms .are octopod but can be readily recognized as immature
stages by the absence of genital openings. According to. Evans (1957)
chaetotaxy of the palps and intercoxal.area may be used to distinguish
between the nymphal.stages,.of the Mesostigmata. .
terizethem. The chelae resemble those of the female although they are
not as Well’developed. It is probable that all species fee.d’in this stage,
Deutonymph (Fig. 13). In the Laelaptidae and Dermanyssidae the
sternal plate attenuates posteriorly and extends as far’as the posterior
margin of coxae IV; the dorsal plate i’s similar to that of the’ adult female ;
and the peritreme is nearly as long as in the adult. There is no genital
opening and. therefore, no epigynial plate.’ (The chelae resemble those
of the’female but are slightly smaller. The claws also are smaller than
in the adult. In most species this’is apparently a feeding stage, but in
Ornithonyssus and Ophionyssus, .and possibly some other Macronyssiriae,
it is’ a non-feeding stage of less than 24 hours duration. That is, the
replete protonymph molts into a deutonymph which, in turn, molts into
the adult within 24 hours. This is not comparable to the pseudochrysalis
of the chiggers because in the Mesostigmata this instar is active right
up to the time of molting and the new appendages form within the old ones.
Protohymphs and deutonymphs of internal mites are practically iden-
tical. That both forms exist is known because it is possible to find
nymphal forms within old nymphal skins just prior to ecdysis.
’Female (Fig. 14). The females of the parasitic Mesostigmata are
always distinguished by the presence of a genital plate or genital pore.
The- genital orifice lies between or anterior to legs IV. .The orifice is
cove’redby a membranous and more or less pleated flap which becomes
more sclerotized and therefore more obvious posteriorly. The anterior
and membranous portion is generally referred to as the genital plate
while the heavily sclerotized portion is thought to be the ventral plate.
Because these two plates are fused they are commonly called the genito-
ventral plate. However, we are not convinced that this plate’is actually
the product of two primitive plates fused’into one and therefore, through-
out this manual, w’e will call it the epigynial plate.
In the external parasites the plates of the ventral surface are: a
sternal, lying between legs II and III; an epigynial, lying between coxae
III and IV and extending posteriorly a greater or lesser distance; an anal,
nearthe posterior tip; a pair of metapodal-plates behind coxae IV; para-
podal plates outside the coxae; and a peritremal plate surrounding the
peritreme.
The sternal plate typically bears three pairs of setae and two pairs
of pores. Occasionally there may be accessory setae and sometimes,
by reduction of the plate, there are less than three pairs of setae on it.
but there are never less than six sternal setae. The plate varies from
a thin transverse rectangle to a large rectangle much longer than wide.
The epigynial plate has a membranous and poorly sclerotized an-
terior margin to allow for the deliverance of the relatively enormous
egg or young. The membranous portion of the epigynial plate extends
from the genital opening forward to the sternal plate and frequently over-
laps its posterior margin. The posterior- portion is sclerotized and
bears at least ’one pair of setae. The posterior margin is pointed or
rounded. .It is never tr.uncate or concave unless proximity to the anal
plate forces it to be. There may be one, two, or three additional pairs
’
’
. 25
of setae on the plate. When there are more. .as in the Haemogamasidae,
they become less constant in distribution and number.
The anal plate is ovate .or triangular, with the vertex pointed cau-
dally. It encloses the anal pore, bears three setae, and has a pubescent
caudal area commonly called the cribrum. Occasionally the single pos-
terior seta is missing; sometimes afew accessory setae may be present.
Some mites, especially the Laelaptidae, have a small plate pushed
in between coxae III and:.IV. This is the endopodal plate. The meta-
sternal plate is lacking in all the-parasitic Parasitoidea, but the meta-
sternal pore and the metasternal seta may be present.
Metapodal plates are generally present but are never strongly de-
veloped except in Eulaelaps (Fig. 59). Parapodal plates are generally
present and in the Dermanyssidae." coalesce with. the peritremalia and
embrace coxae IV. The peritremal plate is probably present in the ma-
jority of species but is often difficult to see. Presternal plates are
never present in the parasitic Gamasina but the presternal area may be
sclerotized, .
Dorsally the female, may have one or. two plates. If there .are two
dorsal plates there may be small accessory .platelets also, as in Ophio-
nyssus (Fig. 41) andin some ofthe Rhinonyssidae.
In the internal parasites, there tends to be a reduction of the ven-
tral plates. The first to disappear is the metasternal plate with its
associated seta and pore. The sternal plate tends to become longer and
narrower and less sclerotized until it disappears completely. The pre-
sternal area is never .sclerotized. The anal plate also becomes less
obvious. Its margin be comes poorly defined and the cribrum may dis-
appear; it may lose a seta,,; or all three setae and finally nothing but the
anal pore may remain.. The epigynial plate persists in most species
(except in the Halarachnidae), even in mites that have no other ventral
plates. It always has the pair of .genital setae, and conversely, it never
bears more than these two setae. Oddly enough, the dorsal plates do
not disappear. They are reduced in size, however, and are mostly
restrictedtothe podosoma, and in some species, as Larinyssue orbicu-
laris (Pig., 76), are reduced to a group of platelets. In other species,
as Ne.onyssus (Fig. 78), there may be two dorsal plates that nearly
cover the entire dorsum.
’
.
Male (Fig. 15). The male may be recognized by the genital pore,
a small, round opening between coxae II on the anterior margin of the
sternal plate. Apparently the primitive condition in the external para-
sites is a completely fused ventral armature called the holoventral plate
(Fig. 15). In its fully developed condition, the plate expands abruptly
posterior to coxae IV (Laelaptidae, Haemogamasidae). This is subject
to reduction, however, and the more common condition is for the plate
to narrow below the legs. In some cases the anal plate may be pinched
off and sometimes the holoyentral plate may be divided at about the level
of coxae IV.
In the internal parasites, the ventral plates are always greatly re-
duced. In no case are they all united; generally there is only a small
26
sternal plate, a so-called genital plate between coxae IV, and an.anal
plate.
The outstanding characteristic.of the male is th,e specially modified
spermatodactyl or spermatophore. carrier. The male gamasid lacks an
a.edeagus; the spermatodactyl, on the mcweable arm of the chela, serves
as a copulatbry organ. It "varies in the parasitic Gamasina. but tends
to be recognizably uniform within.each .^enus.(Pig. 16). A complete un-
derstanding of this one structure would enable one’to place a species into
its.proper genus. Wheth&r-or not it serves as-a selective barrier against
.hybridization is liot known. ’ "
’
;.
-
.., ,. ,.. ""
CLASSI.FICATI.QN ’.,;.
-..
..In. this outline of the classification of the parasitic me.sostigmatid
mites, the families, subfamilies, and genera are defined and keyed out.
The species in each genus or subgenus are listed according to the follow-
ingplan. The type species of each genus or subgenus is’placed first and
the other species follow in alphabetical order; under each species the
earliest, reference to the valid specific name is given first, followed in
chronological order by the various generic and specific combinations of
that. name. that: have been used; synonyms follow the valid specific.name
in chronological order. A comma between a scientific’name and. an
author’s, name .indicates that the name of the .original author of the spe-
cific name has been omitted. In the ...specific citations, a ’paper
that
simply refers to the’ species, without .extended discussion’or the pre-
sentation of new information about it, is ;cited only by the year of the
publication. The numbers of the pages that begin- discussions, of species.
follow such references as are important from tlie stahdpoirit’ot nomen-
clature, taxonomy, or because they cantata new information about the.
species. Letter designations follow these page nitmbers to indicate the;
kind. of information the papers contain. The letters used are:?
aanat-
omy,^ b--biology, c--chorology or.. distribution, Bdescription. .m.--
medical, Itaxonomy, vveterinary, The general scope of’the indi-
vidual .papers can be determined by .consultings’trie complete citations
;’
"
given in the bibliography at the end of this manual. ,
Many of the.^ species ai’-V still so pporly known-that little can be’.gained
by trying to define each"species’listed .here.’ -Much’work must yet be
done before it will be possible to make.a complete’specific revision of
the members.-uf these families. Coverage is. intended to be .complete
through .1956, although- selected references/subsequent to this datejiave
been added.
27
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
less than 10 setae, but they will be irregularly arranged. . . .
. . ... . HAEMOGAMASIDAE
Dorsal surface not thickly beset with Setae. Epigynial shield
with eight or less setae; if with more (some Myonyssus spp.)
then the dorsal setae are sparse and mostly very small, and the
anal plate is extremely broad . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Sternal plate not longer than wide, generally much wider than
long. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DERMANYSSIDAE
None of the coxae with ventral spurs, although the ventral setae
may he spurlike . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4. The posterior seta.of coxa II. longer than the greatest diameter
of the.coxa. Large, coarse, hairy mites, generally over 1 mm
31.
Posterior seta of coxa 1.1 shorter than the length of the coxa . . 5
.’.’.". . . . . . . . .
III; posterior seta of coxa III similar to other coxal setae . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . Haemolaelaps Berlese
10. Medial dorsal setae very small; dorsal plate with concave mar -
gins; female sternal plate twice as wide as long. the third pair
of setae may be off the plate . . . . . . . . . Oryctolaelaps Lange
I?. Peritremalia embracing coxa IV; corniculi weak and flaccid; all
posterior coxal setae slender; legs I and II with spurlike setae
ventrally on trochanter and femur, . . . . . . . . . . . . ... .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Aetholaelaps Strandtmann and Camin
Diagnosis: Generalized roitess with only one pair of setae on the fe-
male epigynial plate, no spur-like or thornlike setae on the coxae. male
chela not shearlike, body oval and legs long. The female sternal plate
but
is wider than long, the male ventral plates are generally entire,
is separate. The better known species are
sometimes the anal plate
very definitely blood suckers, but many species are known only from
known
single specimens or from very small collections and nothing is
of their habits.
.
-
.Host: Mammal Mystromys- albicaudatus.
1952: 2; Bregetova, 1952: 867 (t); Pratt and Lane. 1953: 360; Kee-
gan, 1953: 37; Bregetova, 1953: 309; Dubinin. 1953; Pratt and Goode,
1954: 125 (c); Burgess. 1955; Smith, 1955; Womersley, 1955: 421;
Bregetova, 1956: 86; Baker etal.. 1956.
Laelaps californicus Ewing, 1925: 5 <d); Grant, 1947: 10; Strandtmann,
1949: 434 (t).
Geneiadolaelaps califomicus, Augustson, 1941: 157.
Laelaps virginianus Ewing, 1925: 6 <d); Grant, 1947: 11; Strandtmann,
1949: 343 (t).
Haemolaelaps microti Oudemans, 1926 (d); Bregetova, 1952; 867 (t).
Haemolaelaps mohrae Oudemans. 1928: 374 (d); Nelzina and Barkov.
1951: 179 <m); Nelzina and Romanwa, 1951: 829 (m); Bregetova,
1952: 867 (t).
Hypoaspis cricetophilus Vitzthum, 1930: 417 (d); Strandtmann, 1949:
343 (t).
Laelaps stegemani Hefley, 1935: 22 (d); Strandtmann, 1949: 343 (t).
Haemolaelaps scalopi Keegan. 1946: 71 (d); Strandtmann. 1949: 343 (t),
Atricholaelaps strandtmanni Fox. 1947: 598 (d); Strandtmann, 1949: 343
(t).
Atricholaelaps sjgmodoni Strandtmann, 1946; 164 (d); Randolph and Eads.
1946: 599; Jameson, 1947: 142; Harkema and Kartman. 1948: 186;
Strandtmann, 1949: 343 (t).
Hypoaspis (Haemolaelaps) eos ZumptandPatterson, 1951: 79 (d); Zumpt
and Till, 1953: 246 (t).
-
Localities: Asia Japan; Korea; U.S. S.R. Australia -Fisher Is-
-
land. Bass Strait. South Australia. Europe Germany; Holland; Russia.
-
North America Canada; Mexico; United States; Puerto S4.co. South
-
America Peru.
-
Hosts: Mammals Allactaga saltator, Ammospermophilus leucurus,
Apodemus agrarius. Apodemus flavicollis, Apodemus speciosus, Apo-
demus sylvaticus. Auliscomys boliviensis, Baiomys tayloM, Blarina
breyicauda. Chraeomyg pulcherrunus. CiteUus armatus, Citellus beech-
vi, Citellus columbianus. Citellus lateralis chryppdeirus, Citellus mex-
manus. Citellus mollis. CiteUus pygmaeus, CiteUus richagdaoaM,, Ci-
tellua tridecemlineatus, Citellus undulatus. Clethrionomys glareolus,
Clethrionomys rufocanus. Clethrionomys rutilus, Cratogeomys casta-
nops. Cricetulua barabensis, Cricetulus migratorius. Cricetulus trx-
ton. Cricetus cricetus. Crypt otis parva. Cynomys gunnisoni, Cynomyg
ludovicianus, Didelphis virginiana, Dipodomys mxcrops, Dipodomys ordi,
Eutamiaa minimus, Eutamias sibericus, Evotomys gapperi, Geomye
bursarius, Geomys cumberlandicus, Geomys floridanus, Geomys lu-
tescens, Geomys personatus. Geomys tuza. Lepus califomicus, Mar-
mota monax, Marmota sibirica. Mephitis elongatum. Mephitis nigra,
Meriones persicus, Meriones tamariscinus. Micromys minutus. Micro-
tus. agrestis, Microtus arvalis. Microtus brandti, Micrptus breweri,
Microtus californicus. Microtus fortis, Microtus gregalis, Microtus
montanus, Microtua mordax dutcheri. Microtus mordax sierra, Micro-
tus nanu^ Microtus^ ochrogaster, Microtus oeconomus, Microtus ore-
39
.
Haemolaelaps tateronis (Kadford)
’
.
.
Haemolaelaps traubi (Strandtniann)
land.
-
Hosts: Mammals Saccostomus campestris, Mus coucha.
Hypoaspis (Haemolaelaps) inops var. zuln Berlese, 1918: 129 (d); K&e-
.gan,.19R6:.234 ($ illus.). : .
it. The anal plate is elongated. The.ven.tral plates of the male are con-
tiguous but the anal plate retains its identity.
-
.
.
"
’
Cavilaelaps braziliensis, Fonseca,. 1.938; 104.
.
Locality: South America - Brazil, Bahia.
Host: Mammal - Kerodon spixi.
.
.
Type: Bolivilaelaps tricholabiatus Fonseca.
Diagnosis: Medium mites. The female epigyniai -plate bears only
one pair of setae: the hypostomalprocesses have membranous extensions
bearing a brush of stout setules" with slightly expanded extremities,
.
Locality: South America -.Bolivia.
Host: Mammal - Isothrix bistrlatus.
..
Type material in the U. S. National Museum.
Laelaps hollisteri Ewing. 1925: 2 (d); Grant, 1947: 6(d)’.
49
’
myscus californicus, Peromyscus crinitus. Peroriiyscus maniculatus
gambeli; Thornomys bottae.
Remarks: According to Furman (1955), this species occurs abun-
dantly on Peromyscus californicus and P. crinitus and only rarely on
any other mammal.
.
..
,
-
Host: Mammal Onychomys leucogaster.
- ^- ’.
.
Type material in the U. S. National Museum. ’
:
’’
’
Eubrachylaelaps jamesoni Furman, 1955: 52 (d).
Locality: North America
Host:
- Mexico, Chiapas.
Mammal - Peromyscus nie’xicanus saxatilis.
’
50
’
"-
Remarks: Purman erected the genus Steptolaelaps for his new spe-
cies S. heteromydis that he later found to be identical with Neolaelaps
heteromys Fox and so notified us by letter. Consequently, the new com-
bination, Steptolaelaps heteromys (Fox) should be credited to Furman.
Of 137 specimens at Furman’s disposal, over 90 were from the type
host, Heteromys anomalus.
sternal plate has a straight posterior margin, and the male anal and
ventral plates are confluent. The subgenus Hyperlaelaps included those
species that are pale in color, have an almost flat dorsal shield, have
short and thick medial dorsal setae, and in which the female sternal
plate is lunate, and the male anal plate is separate from the ventral
plate. He also suggests that Laelaps hilaris and Laelaps festinus are
synonyms of each other; that Laelaps pachypus, Oudemans. 1927, is not
the pachypus that Koch described but is what he now calls Laelaps (Hy-
perlaelaps) amphibius; that Laelaps arvicolae Oudemans, 1927, a male,
is not the same as arvicolae Oudemans, 1916, but is the new species
Laelaps micromydis Zachvatkin; and that Laelaps agilis is not determ-
inable. Lange (1955) reviewed the genus Laelaps in the U.S.S.B... and
accepted agilis as the type. He created four new subgenera (Myolaelaps,
Rattilaelaps. Microtilaelapg, and Cricetilaelaps) based mostly on chae-
totaxy and host relationships among cricetine and microtine rodents.
In a number of these efforts, the Russian acaroiogists are no doubt cor-
rect.. but we are not now in a position to critically evaluate their work.
Therefore, we are conforming to the earlier nomenclature. If subgenera
are recognized, the type of the subgenus Laelaps would have to be hil-
aris Koch. 1836 rather than muris (Ljungh. 1799) as designated by Zach-
vatkin or agilis Koch, 1836 as designated by Lange.
It is quite probable that host preference in the species of this genus
is much more marked than the collection data of some of the species
indicate. Sometimes mites are accidentally on a strange host and often
mites may be incorrectly identified. All are obligatory parasites of
small mammals, chiefly rodents. On the other hand, it is also true that
these mites are nidicoles. so that different mammals with similar nests
can provide suitable sites tor the non-feeding activities of these mites
(Wharton, 1957).
Laelaps hilaris Koch, 1836: #4 (d); Murray. 1876; Oudemans, 1913: 195
(d); Oudemans, 1914; Hirst, 1916: 70 (c); Oudemans, 1927; Oude-
mans. 1936: #99. 100, 104 (t); Zachvatkin, 1948; Willmann. 1948 :
68; 1952: 393 (t); Bregetova. 1956: 109 (illus.).
Localities: Europe-Western Europe and the British Isles; U.S.S.R.
Hosts: Mammals - Apodemus flavicollis, Apodemus sylvaticus,
Clethrionomys glareolus. Microtus agrestis, Microtus arvalis, Micro-
tus gregalis, Microtus nivalis, Microtus oeconqmus, Microtus orcaden-
sis, Microtus socialis. Mus musculus, Mustela vulgaris, Sorex araae-
us, Talpa europea.
Remarks: The preferred hosts seem to be Microtus spp., especi-
ally Microtus arvalis.
59
Laelaps arvicolae Oudemans, 1916: 132 (d); Willmann, 1952: 398 (d).
-
Locality: Europe Germany; Netherlands.
Hosts: Mammals - Arvicola arvalis, Microtus amphibius, Mus
minutus.
Remarks; Arvicola arvalis is probably the host of choice.
Laelaps hapaloti Hirst. 1931: 563 (d); Womersley, 1937: 532 (d); Wom-
ersley, 1956: 557.
-
Locality: Australia South Australia, Central Australia.
-
Hosts: Mammals Hapalotis sp., Pseudomys sp., Notomys mitch-
elli.
Laelaps jettmari Vitzthum, 1930: 405 (d); Asanuma, 1951; Mayer. 1951:
21 (m); Jameson et al., 1952: 10 (c); Suyemoto et al., 1954; Brege-
tova, 1956: 108; Baker et al.. 1956: 43.
63
;’
-
.
.
’
Locality: Africa - Egypt, Giza. -’:"" ’. ’. : ’
’
.
’’
’
-
Host: Mammal - Leggada musculoides.
-
Type material in the Laboratory of Medica’l Entomology, Pasteur
Institute, Paris.
Laelaps lavoipierrei Taufflieb, 1954: 440 (d, S illus..).
.
Locality: Africa - French Equatorial Africa, Brazzaville.
Host: Mammal - Lophuromys sikapus-i.
’
Remarks: The above synonymy is that Of Bregetova. We have not
seen Oudeman’s 1938 paper.
still in doubt. It should be noted that Bregetova (1956) lists Laelaps ar-
vicolae Oudemans. 1916, as a synonym. The water rat, or water vole
(Microtus amphibius), is the preferred host.
-
-
of the Pacific Ocean Hawaiian Islands; Marquesan Islands. Islands of
the Atlantic Ocean Bermuda; Puerto Rico. North America - United
States. South America - Brazil; Surinam.
Hosts. Mammals - Arvicanthis dor salts, Arvicanthis niloticus,
Crocidura olivieri, Mastomys coucha, Melomys littoralis, Mus muscu-
lus, Nesokia bengalensis, Rattus conatus, Rattus coucha, Rattus culmo-
rum, Rattus hawaiiensis, Rattus norvegicus. Rattus norvegicus caraco,
Rattus rattus, Rattus rattus kandiyanus, wood rat.
Remarks; The preferred hosts of this mite are species of the genus
Rattus. The mite is found throughout tropical and warm temperate zones
wherever its host is found, with the apparent exception of Europe. We
know of no published record of its occurrence there. Because of its abun-
67
Laelaps pachypus Koch, 1839: #24 (d); Hirst, 1916; Oudemans. 1927:
179 (d); Willmann. 1952.
Liponyssus setiger Ewing, 1920: 290 (d). New synonymy.
Tetragonyssus microti Ewing, 1933: 9 (d); Augustson, 1941.
Laelaps kochi Oudemans, 1936: #101 (t); Grant, 1947; Jameson, 1947;
Jameson, 1950; Jameson et al., 1952.
Laelaps (Hyperlaelaps) amphibius Zachvatkin, 1948.
Hyperlaelaps amphibius, Dubinin, 1953; Bregetova, 1956: ll7(rfand$
illus.).
-
Localities: Asia - Manchuria. Europe Germany; Great Britain;
-
Netherlands; Russia. North America Alaska; Canada; United States.
Hosts: Mammals - Apodemus sp., Arvicola amphibius, Arvicola
arvalis, Blarina brevicauda, Clethrionomys glareolus, Lemmus arvalis,
Microtus agrestis. Microtus amphibius, Microtus californicus, Micro-
tus montanus. Microtus mordax, Microtus ochrogaster, Microtus oecon-
omus. Microtus orcadensis, Mustela vulgaris, Peromyscus sp.. Sorex
obscurus, Sorex vagrans.
Remarks: Oudemans (1936) states that Koch thought he was redes-
cribing Acarus pachypus Herman when he illustrated and wrote the des-
cription of this mite, and that therefore Laelaps pachypus Koch is a jun-
ior homonym. Oudemans then proposed the name kochi. However, since
Koch used the name Laelaps pachypus without reference to Acarus, Oud-
eman’s decision is not consistent with the International Rules of Zoolog-
ical Nomenclature.
Zachvatkin (1948) does not agree that pachypus of Oudemans (1927)
is the same as that of Koch and therefore proposes his new name. He
68
may be quite right but according to the rule of first reviser, it is desir-
able to retain the species as Oudemans has described it. Koch’s type is
lost and his description and illustration are insignificant. The name
pachypus must therefore be applied to this species or be relegated to a
name for a species inquirendae. Such action could be justified only by
a suspension of the Rules of Zoological Nomenclature.
Laelaps hilaris C. L. Koch subspec. sicula Willmann, 1955: 182 (d, $).
-
Locality: Europe Italy, Sicily.
-
Hosts: Mammals Mus musculus brevirostris, Rattus noryegicus.
Remarks: The setae are long and none seem to be thornlike. The
species may be a Tricholaelaps.
Oryctolaelaps bibikovae Lange, 1955; Bregetova, 1856: 119 (tf and $ il-
lus.).
Locality: Asia - U. S. S. R., Primorsky region.
-
Host: Mammal Mogera robusta.
Laelaps giganteus Berlese, 1918: 129(d); Hirst, 1925: 67; Bedford, 1932;
Keegan. 1956: 253 (? illus.).
Macrolaelaps giganteus, Radford, 1950: 369.
-
Locality: Africa Kenya; Liberia; Nigeria; Uganda; Union of South
Africa, Zululand, Transvaal; Belgian Congo; Sudan; Rhodesia,
Hosts: Mammals - Arvicanthis abyssinicus. Arvicanthis dor salts,
Dasymys incomtus, Dasymys rufulus, Dephomys defua. Lemniscomys
barbarus, Lemniscomys griselda, Lemniscomys macculus, Lemnis-
comys striatus, Mastomys coucha, Praeomys tullbergi, Rattus tulbergi,
Rhabdomys pumilis, Tatera schinzi.
Laelaps vansomereni Hirst. 1923: 690 (d); Hirst, 1925: 56; Bedford.
1932; Zumpt, 1950: 78; Keegan. 1956.
Locality: Africa - Kenya; Uganda; Southern Rhodesia; Sudan. Torit;
Union of South Africa, Zululand, Northern Transvaal.
-
Hosts: Mammals Aethomys chrysophilus, Aethomys namaquensis,
Mastomys coucha, Mus chrysophilus, Saccostomus campestris, Suncus
varilla.
Laelaps rothschildi Hirst. 1914: 325 (d); Domrow and Smith, 1956: 202.
Echinolaelaps rothschildi, Turk. 1950: 71.
Laelaps melomys Womersley, 1937: 534 (d); Domrow and Smith, 1956:
202.
Locality: Islands of the Pacific Ocean - Dutch New Guinea. Aus-
tralia - Queensland.
Host: Mammals
Melomys littoralis, Melomys
- Mus cervinipes.
sp,, Uromys lorentzi, Uroa’g’s stajkeri,
Rattus assimilis.
3. Dor sum with two plates, the posterior small, pygidial. Anal
plate oval, anterior margin rounded. Parasitic only on mam-
mals . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Allodermanyasus
.
. . . . . . . . . . . . ..
plate slightly expanded behind coxae IV. Parasitic on birds. .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dermanyssus
Not as above .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
engorged specimens 20
Epigynial plate with more than six setae; male ventral plate di-
vided into sternogenital and ventroanal plates. Parasitic on
bats . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Spinolaelaps
Remarks: Many of the mites of this genus are among the most im-
portant acarine parasites. Ornithonyssus bacoti readily attacks man
and has been implicated as a disease transmitter; it also acts as the vec-
tor of filarial worm in cotton rats. 0. burs a and 0. sylviarum may be-
come so abundant in bird nests as to kill the young birds by exsanguina-
tion.
and Hammon and Reeves (1948) found it, taken from.various wild birds,
to be naturally infected with Western equine encephalitis, .and with mixed
infections of Western equine encephalitis and St. Louis encephalitis. Hof-
stad (1949) was able to infect the mite with Newcastle disease of chickens
but could not transfer it through the bite alone. Chamberlain arid Sikes
(1955), and Reeves et al. (1955), after .exhaustive tests, independently
reached the conclusion that sylviaruna is unimportant as a reservoir of
the equine encephalrfides.
than three pairs of setae on the sternal plate. This character Is variable.
Zumpt and Till (1953) erected Chelanyssus because the chela of the
generotype, Chiroptonyssus forsythi, has a "grappling hook" structure,
unlike that of any other mite. To us, however, the illustrations they
give indicate that the moveable arm of the chela is bent so far back as
to give the appearance of such a hook. It is placed in synonymy because
in all other respects it seems to have the general characteristics of Xcho-
ronyssus. We cannot be sure of this, however, until the type can be
restudied and until males are found; forsythi is known only from the fe-
male and protonymph. As in robustipes. it has only two pairs of setae
on the sternal plate’.
Dr. Fonseca also lists Inchoronyssus Kolenati, 1858 and Chirop-
terolaelaps Vitzthum, 1927 as synonyms of Ichoronyssus. The former
is a lapsus calami and the latter is a nomen nudum.
.
.
Host: Mammal - "a small bat, probably Vesp.erugo.pipistrellus."
Remarks: Zumpt (1950). remarks, that this mite may sometimes an-
noy man, and in Italy has been known t.o cause dermatitis.
,
.
Remarks; Only the female of this species is known. It is very sim-
-
ilar to ^obu^st^es^ (Ewing). ..The drawing Fonseca gives indicates that
.
there are three pairs Of setae on the sternal plate; this seems to be the
only character differentiating it from robustipes, which has only two
pairs of setae on the plate. , . .
.
.
Morlan and Strandtmanh (.1949). Morlan .(1952) and Yunker (1958)
incorrectly referred to this species. What they actually had was Icho-
rpnyssus robustipes.. . .
.. - :; :. . .
.
Icboronyssus hasei Vitzthum ..;’ ’.
’
Ifchoronyssus hasei Vitzthum, 1932: 23 (Sj; Fonseca, 1948": .299.
Locality: South America - Venezuela,. Puerto la Cruzt
-
Hpst: " Mammal Myotis nigricans. ,
.
.
.
:-
’ -lehoronyssus hoogstraali (Keegan). New combination
’Type material in the U. S. National. Museum. .. ..
^
,
-
Host: Mammal Myotis ruber. ., ., , ,
.
.
.
Remarks: Fonseca mentions that this is not to be .confused with
Liponyssus kolenati Oudemans, 1902, a species known only from the
93
Lepronyssus leprosus Kolenati, 1858; 1859: 180 (d); Fonseca, 1948: 268.
308.
-
Locality: Africa Egypt.
Host: Mammal - Rhinolophus clivosus.
Type
- (Fig. 43)
material in the South Australian Museum. .
.
’
. ..
(Fig. 44) ",. .
.
.
.
Diagnosis: Dorsal plate entire and covering most of the dorsum;
some of .’trie. coxae with ventral or posterior spurs or both; female epi-
gyniai plate rounded posteriorly; male with a holoventral plate that is
slightly-expanded behind coxae IV; female without palpal spurs; female
chelae generally quite long, frequently as muchas a.thirdofthe^total
length of the chelicerae. ’
.
Hirstionyssus blanchardi, Fonseca, 1948: 296; Willmann. 1952; Strandt-
mann and Morlan, 1953; Bregetova. 1956: 117(illus.).
:’ Locality: Europe - England; France; Germany; Switzerland.
Hosts: Mammals - Cynomys ludovicianus (specimens kept in cap-
.
.
Hirstionyssus ci-eightoni.’ Foiiseca, 1.948: 29 7;’...Strandtmann and Hunt,
:- 1’953. .
’
....
.
.
Host: Mammal - "Young porcupine." . -
’"’ Hirstiohyssus cncgtj. (Sulzer)
"
.
Acarug criceti Sulzer, .1.774: .33; Qudemans,, 1929: 96; Ponseca, 1948:
319.
Liponyssus criceti, Oudemans. 1932: 202 (illus.). ;. . .
... .,
Hirstionyssus ci-icgti. Zemska. 19.55; Bregetova, 1955:. 185 (rfand?. il-
. . ’-’...
’
;.. ;;- ^..’
’
lus.).
"
(
.
Locality: Europe - Germany; U.S. S. 11.
Hosts: ..Mammals - Citellus citellus. Citellus major. Gitellus pyg-
maeus. Citellus suslicus. Cricetulusbarabensis. Cricetulus.tritQnj Cri-
cetus auratus, Cricetus cricetus. Ci-icetug eyersmannt."’
""~
103
Hirstionyssus hillJ.Ja.iriesbn
-
Locality;’ North America United States, California, Kansas, Ne-
vada, , .
Hirstionysaus hirsfl’Fonseca
.
Host: Mammal - "bats,"
.
Leiognathus liberiensis Hirst.. 1912: 364,
Liponyssus liberiensis. Hirst, 1921; Radford,’ 1944.
Hirstionyssus liberiensis, Fonseca, 1948; Strandtmann and Morlan, 1953.
.Locality: Africa - Liberia; Uganda.
-
-
Host: Mammal Heliosciurus rufobrachium.
-
.
’
"
’
295 (d). ",-. ,
..;-’’ .. . .,-’
Hosts: Mammals - Neotoma albtgula, ’Neotoma. fuscipes, N’eotoina
’.’
’
micropus. .
.
Type material in the U. S. National Museum.
Neoichoronyssus (Hirstionyssus) triacanthus Jameson, 1950: 166 (d).
Hirstionyssus triacanthus, Strandtmann and Morlan,. 1953.’
Locality: North America’-United States. .1 ,
.
Hirstionyssus transiliensis Bregetova
.
Diagnosis: Dorsal plate undivided and covering most of the dor-’
sum. Female sternal plate with’only four setae; epigynial plate pointed
posteriorly; coxa I with a setigerous spur; palp trochanter bearing a ven-
tral spur. Male holoventral plate undivided and not expanded behind coxa
’
’
IV.
.
Neoichoronyssus wernecki (Fonseca)
(Pig. 45)’.’ " .
mite. ’
’
Neoichoronyssus dentipes (Strandtmann and Eads)
.
.
,
Types Ichoronyssus hubbardi Jameson.
Diagnoses: Dorsal plate entire and covering most of the dorsum.
Female palp without spurs; epigynial plate rounded posteriorly. Male
ventral plate divided just posterior of coxae IV; some of the coxae with
setigerous spurs.
.
’ ,
.
Type: Liponissus pereirai Fonseca.
Diagnosis: Dorsal shield undivided; sternal plate with the usual
threepairsof setae and two pairs of slitlike pores, bearing, in addition,
two special structures in the form of large infundibuliform orifices a
little behind the anterior pair of setae; genital plate scalelike, tapering
posteriorly to a point; tibia long, as also are the other segments of the
legs; a ventral spine is present on coxa III. (Copied.from Fonseca, 1948:
268.)
’
’"’
Lepronyssoides pereirai (Fonseca)
-
(Pig. 48)
Liponissus pereirai Fonseca, 1935: 80 (d).
Lepronyssoides pereirai, Ponseca, 1941: 263 (t); Fonseca, 1948: 268,
-
Locality: South America Brazil, State of Parahuba, State of Rio
Grande.
Host: Mammal - Kerodon spixi, also a wild rat commonly known
as "punare."
Lepronyssoides matogrosso (Fonseca). New combination
to be. congeneric. ’
. : .
.
.
.
.
,.
.
.
. ,
";
Hirstesia sternalis (Hirst)
.
.
(Fig. 50)
Liponyssus sternalis Hirst, 1921: 781 (d). :... .-"
Lepronyssoides sternalis, Ewing, 1947: 87 (t).
.
Hirstesia sternalis, Fonseca, .1948: 266 (t),’Turk, 1952: 479 (d).
Locality: Europe - Greece, Salonika; England, South Devon.
Hosts: Mammals - "bat m.cave,..";Rhinolophu’s hjpposiderds minu -
tus. ’.’ ... :’.:.’:’." -
.
: Hirstesia britteni Radford . . -..;
"
tidae. :’.. .
^, ,
...
Locality: Africa - Madagascar.
Hosts: Mammals - Lemur albifrons, Propithecus verreauxi.
113
.
Liponyssus cyclaspis Oudemans, 1906: 61 (new...name tor Liponyssus
pipistrelli Oudemans, 1906, not Oudemans. 3-.904); Oudemans, 1915.
Steatonyssus cyclaspia; .Fonseca, 1948: 316. ’,.
.
’
...
.
.
-
LocaIi+y:-’-.Europe: Netherlands. :. ;.i, ... . ; .
.
Remarks: All of the above references are taken from Fonseca (1948). /
We have not seen Oudemans’.papers. ; , ,
. ..;
’
: ’.Steatonyssus eos Zumpt and Till
116 .
.
.
.
.
Host: Mammal - Solenodon paradoyu.s.. . ;. . ...
Remarks: The host had been imported from Haitu The mites were
found only on the fresh feces, not on the .host.
_
..’ ’- ..
.
Steatonyssus sudanensis, Fonseca,"1948; 319; Zumpt and Till, 1954.
Locality: Africa - Sudan; Khartoum..
-
Host: Mammal Liponycteris nudiventris,
Steatonyasus’superans Zemska
Steatonyssus reedi Zumpt and Patterson, 1952: 163 (d); Zumpt and Till,
1954: 53.
Pellonyssus reedi, dark and Yunker, 1956: 94 (t).
Locality: Africa - Union of South Africa, Johannesburg.
Hosts: Birds - Creatophora cinereus, Hyphantornis velatus, Ony-
. chognathus morio. Passer melanura, Ploceus velatus.
Coxae unarmed. Male with undivided holoventral p’late that is not ex-
panded behind coxae IV.
Remarks: Kolenatiohyssus athleticus is known only from the male
and differs from the male of Kadfordiella ’oudemansi. apparently only in
having unpedunculated claws on tarsus II. We believe this denotes male
dimorphism within the species and not a generic difference. Both types
of males were taken from the same host,
tapering posteriorly, the posterior small and pygidial; sternal plate about
as broad as long; epigynial plate narrow and .pointed. Male with a single
dorsal plate tapering, posteriorly.’ Primarily parasites of rodents.
’
" ’
.
Localities: Africa.- Egypt; Sudan. Asia - U.S.S.R., Ukraine.
Europe. North America - United. States. ," ’
.
.
Hosts; Mammals,-.Acomy s cahirinus, Acomys dimidiatus, Acoroys
russatus, Alticola argentatus, Arvicanthis niloticus, Cricetulus migra-
torius. Homo sapiens, "man," .Meriones persicus, Kus musculus, ’.Mus
musculus’ gentil.is, ’^tattus alexandrinus, Rattus norvegicus,’ Rattus rat -
tus, Rattus turkestanicus, "rodents."
Remarks: The preferred host of this mite is apparently the common
house mouse,’ Mus musculus. Ewing (1942) wrote that’a specimen had
been found in the United States in 1909; but was,not reported again until
1938. (It has been frequently reported since that date.) In the/same
paper Ewing also commented that the mite bites man and may cause a
rash. In 1946, Huebner et aL. reported that Rickettsia akari, the causa-
tive agent of rickettsialpox, could be’recovered from this mite and sug-
gested it as a transmitter of the disease. According to Bishopp and
Philip (1952). there is a. report from Russia that the mite can transmit
tularemia. Fuller (1954) found the life cycle to include egg, larva, two
nymphal stages and adult male and female. The larva does not feed, but
both nymphal instars do. -
AIlodermanyssus aegyptius (Hirst)
Remarks: Wehave not seen the types of this species. It was placed
in Allodermanyasus by Keegan (ibid.). There is a strong possibility that
this maybe a synonym of sanguineus Hirst, in which case aegyptius would
120
. .:’.. "
Genus Liponyssoides Hirst, 1913
"
’
muris Hirst.
Diagnosis: Like Allodermanyssus except the pygidial plate is lack-
ing; the undivided dorsal plate covers about half of the dorsum and in un-
fed specimens reaches nearly to the posterior tip. Parasitic on rodents.
Remarks: It is quite possible that a thorough study of the Derma-
nyssinae will show Liponyssoides and Allodermanyssus to be the same.
-
ia; Ceylon; Formosa; India. ;
.
’"’
Hosts: Mammals - Acomys sp.. "Arvicanthis niloticus, Rattus nor-
vegicus, Rattus rattus. "’ .’.
Remarks: Hirst illustrates this" species as having a single dorsal
:plate but in 1916 (page 63) he states. "This mite is easily recognized by
the shape of the minute posterior scutum on.the dorsal surface." Hence,
this species is either variable in this respect, or Liponyssoides and Allo-
dermanyssus are truly synonymous.
’
Dermanyssus avium Puges, 1834; Barnesby, 1871; Lang, 1871; Murray,’.
’
’
’
.
laboratory studies/Reeves et al’. (1955), and Chamberlain and Sikes
(1955), concluded that the chicken mite plays a minor role, if any, in
the perpetuation of the encephalitis viruses in nature^. Macfie. and Thomp-
son (1929) found presumptive evidence indicating that the mite is the
intermediate host and vector of a .trypanosome of canaries. -
.
.
Warren (1940) presented a-detailed study of the genital, system of
E>. gallinae. . ,
.
.
Locality: North America - Canada, Ontario Province; United
States. Maryland, Minnesota, District of Columbia.
Hosts: Birds - "Nuthatch," Passer domesticus.
.
.
Localities: Europe - England; Netherlands; U.S.S.R. Africa - Up-
per French Guinea. ’. ..
.
. .
,
.Hosts: Birds - Ant bus arboreus, Hi.rando rufula, Hirundo urbica,
"mart.en, " Micropus affinis, Passer montanus..
Remarks: Hirst (1920) suggests this ia,’ at most, .a variety of gal-
linae. It has been, accused of attacking -man,. : The original reference
.
(Hermann, 1804) was not foundby.us; the ..reference was .taken from- Oud-
emans (1929). ..: - ... .. : ,
.
. .
.
,
.
Dermanyssus oti Ewing
.
,
Diagnosis: Medium sized mites; dorsal plate entire and covering
most of the dorsum. Holoventral plate of male slightly expanded behind
coxae IV. Epigynial plate of female somewhat expanded and frequently
bearing more than eight setae. Chelae in both sexes long, slender, and
poorly sclerotized, both arms equally developed, edentate, and without
setation. Male chela without spermatbdactyl.
Remarks: Furman and Tipton (1955).’placed Myonyssus lathe subfam-
ily Macronyssinae, thus emphasizing its dermanyssid characteristics .
However, we believe that the unmodified structure of the male ’chela is
basic in nature and therefore propose a’separate subfamily for it,"
"
, .
.
.
. .’. Myonyssus ingricus’ Breget’ova
.
..
’
It is not yet definitely proven that these mites are. obligate parasites,
Perhaps some species, as Eulaelaps stabularis; are not, but others.
such as Haeroogamaaus liponyssoideB certainly seem to be. All species
are commonly found in nests of rodents and other small ve’rteB’rates."
A fine review of this family was written by Keegan (1951), a paper
from which we have borrowed treely;:’We have followed Asanuma (1952)
and placed Euhaemogamasus in synonymy with Haemogamasus. Also,
Eulaelaps and Brevisterna have been added to the family.^’ ’.’
.
Key to the Genera of Haemogamasidae
;? :
.
Eulaelaps stabularis (Koch)
.
: ;;;.:.(Fig. 59>
.
Gamasus .stabularis Koch, 1836: i3 (d).
HyppaspiS stabularis, G. andR. Canestrini, 1832; Oudemans, 1913: 189.
Laelaps (Eulaelaps) stabularis. Berlese, 1903: 13; Halbert, 1915.
Eulaelaps stabularis. Hirst, 1914; Ewing, 1932; Hora, 1934; Willmann,
1939; Radford. ’1939;. Warren. 1940 (b); Turk, 1945: 135; Randolph
andEads, 1946; Ewing. 1947: 83(d); Jameson, 1947; Pratt and Pritz,
1947 (atlas); Hughes, 1948; 0,’Farrell and Butler, 1948; Schweizer,
1949; Asanuma, 1949;.Jameson, 1950; Zumpt. 1950; Asanuma, 1951;
Jameson et.al.. 1952; Mo.rlan. 1952; Willmann. 1952; 1955: 181;
^Dubinin, 1953;-B.regetova, 1953; 1956: 100 (illus. ); Baker et al.,
1956; Keegan, 1956.
Eulaelaps arcualis Tragardh, 1912: 577.
Localities: Africa-Egypt. Asia - China; Japan; Korea; Manchuria.
Europe - England; Germany; Isle of Lewis; Ireland; Norway; Outer Heb-
rides; Scotland,, Switzerland; North America - Canada, Ontario; United
States.
Hosts: Mammals-AlactagHlus acontion, Apodemus agrarius, Apo-
demus flavicollis, Apodemus geisha. Apodemus speciosus, Apodemus
sylvat-icus, ’ Aryicanthis niloticus, Arvicola amphibius, Arvicola ter-
.
restris, BIarina bre.vi,cauda, ; Gite’llus dauricus, Clethrionomys glareo-
lus,- Clethrionomys rufocanus, Clethrionomys rutilus, "cotton mouse, "
"cotton rat, " Cricetulns barabensis, Cricetus cricetus, Pidelphis sp..
Meriones erythrourus, Meriones meridianus, Meriones persicus, Mer-
iones tristrami, Microtus arvalis, Microtus oeconomus, Microtus greg-
alis, Microtus montebelli, Microtus pellicus, Mus musculus, Mustela
erminea, Myospa-lax dybowskii, Nesokia indica, Pitymys pinetorum,
Rattus norvegicus, Rattus turkestanicus, Sorex araneus, Talpa euro-
paea, Talpa aItaica,-Tscherskia triton. Birds - No specific birds are men-
tioned in the literature but we have, on occasion, found it in pigeon nests.
Remarks: It seems certain, that this species is ovoviviparous; we
128 :; .
.
.
.
.
.
.
Hosts: Mammals - Alactagulus acontion, Allactaga saltator, Ar-
vicola terres.tris, C.itellus pygmaeus, Microtus- h.randti, Mus musculus,
Ochotona daurica, Scirtoppda telum. : ; . .
.
.
Eulaelaps novus Vitzthum. . ... ’.’
Eulaelaps novus Vitzthum," 1924; 1925; 165-’<d); Wiilmann.
1952; Turk,
1952. ’ /: .. .’ .
Laelaps pedalis Banks, 1909: 136 (d); Banks, 1915; Grant, 1947.
.Eulaelaps pedalis. Radford, 1942.
Locality: North America - Canada, Ontario.
.,.Host: Mammal - "Chipmunk. " .,
Tipton, 1955.
Locality: North America - Alaska; Canada; northern United States.
Hosts: Mammals - Blarina brevicauda, Blaring brevicauda tal-
poides, Clethrionomys gapperi, Clethrionomys gapperi ochraceus, "field
mouse," "meadow mouse," Microtus montanus, Microtus oregoni, Mi-
crotus pennsylvanicus pennsylvanicus. Micr.otus sp., Myotis lucifugus
lucifugus, Napaeozapus insignis msignis, Peromyscus maniculatus gra-
cilis, Pitymys pinetorum.’ Sorex ’cinereus, Tamiasciurus hudsonicus
(nest).
’
Remarks: Bregetova (1956) and other Russian workers consider _H.
nidi and H, ambulang as two’ distinct species. .We have not. examined
type material and are therefore not qualified to judge. Keegan’s synon-
ymy is followed arbitrarily.
’
’
.
’
’
..
.
Hafemogamasus avisugus Vitzthum
Haemogamasus harperi-l^eegan
Mus hebridensis, Mus sylvaticus, "nest of" Arvicola arvalis, "nest of"
Talpa europaea, Sorex araneus, Rattus rattus frugivorus, Talpa alpina,
Talpa europaea.
tus norvegicus.
gan, 1951; Jameson et al., 1952: 10; Bregetova, 1956: 148 (?, illus.).
Haemogamasus polychaeta Bregetova, 1949. ; .
-
Hosts: Mammals Arvicanthis sp., Chaerophon pumilis, Mus tri-
-
; . Haemogamasus liponyssoides Ewing
Canada (eastern part); United States (eastern and southern area). Iowa.
Hosts: Mammals - Apodem,us agrarius, Apodemus speciosus, Ar-
vicola terrestris, Blarina brevicauda, Blarina brevicauda aloga, Bla-
rina brevicauda compacta, Blarina brevicauda talpoides, Clethrionomys
gapperi, Clethrionomys rufocanus, Condylura cristata, Didelphys vir-
giniana, Didelphis virginiana pigra, Microtus montanus, Microtus mor-
dax, Microtus ochrogaster (nest), Microtus pennsylvanicus, Parasca-
lops breweri, Peromyscus gossypinus, Peromyscus leucopus novebora-
censis, Peromyscus nest. Pitymys pinetorum,. Rattus norvegicus, Sca-
lopus aquaticus howelli, Scalopus arge.ntatus. (type host), Sigmodon his-
pidus, Sorex cinereus, Sorex fume.us, Sorex palustris, Sorex palustris
albibarbis, Talpa altaica. Talpa europaea.
,
Haemogamasus mandschuricus Vitzthum, 1930: 397 (d); Asanuma. 1948:
29; Asanuma, 1948: 171; Keegan, 1951: 218 (c, d); Asanuma. 1951;
Jameson et al., 1952; Purman and Tipton, 1955; Bregetova, 1956:
146(illus.).
Locality: Asia - Japan; North China; Manchuria; U.S.S.R.
, ,, .Hosts: Mammals - Apodemus agrarius, Apodemus geisha, Apo-
demus speciosus, Apodemus sylvaticus, Clethriononqys mikado, Cleth-
rionomys rufocanus, Crioetulus triton, Dipus sowerbyi, Eutamias si-
biricus, Marmota sibirica, Microtus brandti, Microtus fortis, Microtus
gregalis, Ochotona daurica. Phodopus bedfordiae, Scaptochirus gillie si,
Talpa altaica.
.
Euhaemogamasus liponyssoides dccidentalis Keegan,
"
1951: 255 (d);
Jameson et al., 1952. ’’
’
. .
.
Haemogamasus pontiger (Berlese)
.
.
,
.
Type: Euhaemogamasus utahensis Ewmg.
Sternolaelaps Zumpt and Patterson, 1951: 63. ;.
Type: Euhaemogamasus utahensis Swing.
Diagnosis: Female sternal plate reduced, bearing only the middle
pair of sternal setae, although accessory setae may be present, Dor-
s’al plate undivided or a small pygidial plate may be present in the fe-,
male; fixed arm of chela in both sexes transversely striated and.bear-
ing a.piluj dentilis. .’
,
,
Type material in the U. S.
National Museum.
Brevisterna morlani Strandtmann and Allred, 1956: 123 (d. rf and ?, il-
lus.>.
Locality: North America. - United States, Colorado, New Mexico.
Hosts: Mammals - Cynomys gunnesqni, Neotoma albigula (type
host), Neotoma micropus, Peromyscus leucopus, Peromyscus manicu-
latus, Peromyscus truei, Sylvilagus auduboni.
Remarks: Neotoma is the host of choice of.this mite. It is, so sel-
dom found on other hosts that its occurrence on them is probably acci-
dental. .
-
Hosts: Mammals’- Dip odoiays ordii, Microdipodops megacephalus,
Microdipodops pallidus (type host), Onychomys leucogaster, Perognathus
longimembris, Peromyscus mani.culat.us.-: .
. .Description jdt the family. Robust mites having the ’general facies
of Laelaps. -Corniculi--elongate, barbed, recurved; or harpoon^shaped
at the tips. (’This is nof-easily seen unless-the gn’athosoma is mounted
separately on its side.) Chelicerae may be chelate (Hemilaelaps),.or
’
fixed arm may tie lacking (Ixodorhynchus). Coxae I and 11, or coxae I,
II, and Iir.ea.ch with one or two heavy, blunt spurs ventraUy. Epigyniai
plate rounded posteriorly and bearing one pair of setae. Dorsal plate
covering most of the dorsum, nearly always partially divided. External
parasites of snakes. : ’
.
.
.
,
Key to the Genera of Ixodorhynchidae’
Chelicera with only one arm, strongly developed and bearing
three or more heavy, recurved teeth , . . . . . . Ixodorhynchus >
’’’,’
’
Raillietia hopkinsi Radford, 1938: 428 (d); Olsen and Bracken. 1950.
Locality: Africa - Uganda.
Host: Mammal - Kobus defassa ugandae, a waterbuck.
’
’Genus Spelaeorhynchus Neumann, 1902
’
(Fig. 63)
Type: Spelaeorhynchus praecursor Neumann.
’Diagnosis: Large, broad, .ticklike mites.
.
Spelaeorhynchus praecursor Neumann
(Pig. 63)
Spelaeorhynchus praecursor Neumann, 1902: 31 (d).; Banks, 1917.
Localities: Central America. South America. West Indies - Ja-
maica.
Hosts: Mammals - "Bats." ’
These are large mites that parasitize pangolins and South American
armadillos. At least one species, Manitherionyssus heteroiarsus, is
known to run sideways when disturbed..
The genus Mariitherionyssus is placed in the same family as Dasy-
ponyssus on the basis of similar fore legs, similar reduction of ventral
plates and similarity of hosts.
143
’
., .,
entirely lacking. Pulvillus of leg I frequently with two "eye spots." In-
’
.
Remarks:. Records of mites of this family taken from snakes in
zoos shouldbe considered in the light of the possibility that they. may be
transferred among snakes in captivity (as happens so frequently with
Ophionyssus natricis).
Entonyssus halli Ewing, 1922: 9 (d); Schmidt, 1940; Keegan, 1943; Turk,
1947; Radford, 1953. ;. " ’,
Entonyssus -ewingi Hubbard, 1939: 657 (d); Hubbard, 1940; Schmidt, 1’940;
’
-
Host: Reptile Crotal.us cinereous. ", .
’
Entonyssus fragilis Keegan. 1946: 73 (d). ’; ’’
"
.
.
Entonyssus glasmacherj.. Vitzthum
(Fig. 69) ..^"’A..’""
Entonyasus glasmacheri Vitzthum, 1935:.710(d, cfand?, illus.); Schmidt,
’
’
1940; Keegan, 1943; Turk. 1947.
.
Locality: Europe - Germany, Berlin Zoo. ’.
’
’’’
’’’
Host: Reptile - Elaphe quadrivittata.. .
’
’
’
"
Host: Reptile - Dendraspis angusticeps.
Male and female with only two pairs of setae in the above areas..,
Abdomen of the gravid female greatly elongated in most spe-:
cies. Parasites of fur seals and walruses . . . . Orthohala.rachne
3. Palp with only four moveable segments, the palpal tibia and
palpal tarsus being fused. Combined length of the moveable
segments of the palp much less than. the fused coxae . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pneumonyssus
1925; Vitzthum, 1936: 266; Ferris, 1942; Haarl^v. 1943: 273 (a);
Newell, 1947: 2.42 (c. d, t); Margolis, ’1954: 276.
Locality: Europe - Ireland to the Baltic Sea. North America-Uni-
ted States, West Coast.
Hosts: Mammals - Halichoerus grypus, Phoca vitulina richardi.
Remarks: Ferris (1942) reported this m-ite from Phoca richardi,
Pacific Grove, California. Newell doubted that it was actually this spe-
cies but Margolis. (1954) includes .it .in his.list of parasites from sea
mammal’s of the North American West Coast. .
’
Halarachne miroungae Ferris ’
Halarachne miroungae Ferris, 1925: 164(d); Doetschman, 1941; Ferris,
1942; Newell, 1947: 243 (c, d,.t); Margolis, 1954: 276.
Locality: North America - The Pacific Coast, from Baja California
to Washington State.
Hosts: Mammals - Phoca richardi, Mirounga angustirostris.
Remarks: Newell(1947) states that it is possible that the mites from
the two above hosts may not be the same species. Mirounga angustiros-
tris is the type’ host, ; . . .
’
,
Genus Orthohalarachne Newell, 1947
(Fig. 71)
Type: Halarachne attenuata Banks.
Diagnosis: Fairly large mites (one mm or more in length) in which
the opisthosoma of the gravid female is greatly elongated, giving the
mite a wormlike appearance. The male spermatodactyl forms a heavy
hook and bears a foliaceous appendage. Parasitic in the nasal passages
of the Otariidae and Odobenidae (fur seals and walruses respectively) ,
Remarks: Newell (194 7) .has fully reviewed the species included in
this genus. ...
. .
150
.
.
’
"
^ "’, ’
-
Orthohalarachne .attenuata, Newell. 1947: ’250 (c. d, t); Margblis. 1954:
’.:’
’’
’
’,... > -. ’-
’
.277. :- .
,
Locality: North America - Pribiloff Islands ’til’ the Bering Sea to
’
’
. .
.
.
Hosts: Mammals - Callorhirius ursinas cynoceprialus, Eumetopias
.
Type material in the U. S. National Museum.
Halarachne diminuata Poetschman, 1944: 72 (d).
Orthohalarachne diminuata, Newell,. 1947: 260 (c, d. t); Margolis, 1954.
Locality: North America - Goast of California to’St. Paul Island,-
Alaska.
Hosts: Mammals - .Callorhinus ursinus, Zaiophus californianus.
.
.
.
;
.
Host: Tamiasciurus douglasii moltipilosus...
Remarks: This mite probably-does not .belong in the genus Pneumo-
nyssus. It differs in having the sternal plate wider than long and in hav-
ing a distinct genital plate. Also, the host is a rodent rather than a
primate,
’: ,
. 153
. ’
/
Host: Mammal - Pap.io ursinus,
.
.
,
Pneumonyssus procavians ’Radford, ,1938: ..147^); Furman, 1954: 40 (c,
d); Zumpt and Till, 1954: 210.^. .
Type material in. the South African Institute for Medical Research.
Pneumonyssus. santos-diasi Zumpt and T.ill, 1954: 208 (d, d, ? and larva).
Locality: Africa. - Mozambique, Chicualacuala.
.Hosts: Mammals - Cercopithecus aethiops, Papio ursinus.
’
Pneumonyssus ’stammeri Vitzthum
.
Type material in the Musee Royal du Congo’ Beige.
’’ """ ’
’
Rhinophaga atheruri Fain, 1957: 77 (d, illus.).
Locality: Africa - Belgian Congo, Kivu.
Host; Mammal - Atherurus africanus centralis.
-
Rhinophaga leopoldi Fain, 1957: 71 (d, illus.).
Locality; Africa Belgian Congo, Kivu.
-
Host: Mammal - Atherurus africanus centralis.
-
.
Rhinophaga papionis Fain,. 1955: 309 (d, <f and’?, illus.). .
:
’
(Fig. 74). .
Remarks: These mites are found only in th-e upper respiratory tract
(the nasal passages and frontal sinuses), not in the bronchi and lungs.
There ’seems to be no definite clinical evidence that they have a serious
pathogenic effect on the dog.
6. Dorsum with two plates, one podosomal and one pygidial. (The
latter always bears two setae on the posterior margin.),Body
elongate; generally slightly constricted medially. Restricted
..to passeriform birds . . . . ;..’. . . , , ;’. . . . . Ptilonyssus ...
Dorsum with one plate. Body elongate; a well formed tritostern-
um present . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Vitznyssus
7. Dorsum with four plates; one podosomal, one pygidial, and two
medial. (In the only species known, the two medial plates each
bear three prominent setae.,) From a Brazilian-brown creeper.
. ,, . . . . . ’. . . . ,... ...
. . . .... .-. ; . .^. . . . . Flavionyssus
With six dorsal plates: one podosomal, one pygidial, and four
. . . . . . . . . . ... . . . ...
small medial plates. Cine species, from a Brazilian flycatcher
. . . .’.". . . . Trayanyssus ...
With six, dorsal plates: one podosomal, one opisthosomal and
flycatcher.. . . .
two on either side of the opisthosomal plate. From a Brazilian
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ro.c.hanyssus
12. Stigma and peritreme near the posterior end,of the body. Anal
pore surrounded by a free membrane. Found in ralliform birds
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rallinyasus
’- .’ .
Rhinonyssus alberti Strandtmann, 1956: 140 (d, <S and 9, illus.); Fain,
:
’
1957: 48. ’ . .
.
Locality: North.Amer-ica - United States., California.. ,
.
Host: Bird - Colymbus caspicus.
’
. . .
members of the genus. ’’This, -plus the fact that it is from a micropo-
diform bird, may necessitate a’separate generic status. ;.. .
Type
U.S.S.R.
Rhinonyssus minutus
.
(Bregetova)
Rhinonyssus waterstoni. Hirst, 1921: 359 (d); Castro and Pereira, 1947;
Strandtmann, 1956.
Rhinonyssus (?) waterstoni. Fain, 1957: 44.
Sternostomum waterstoni, Vitzthum, 1935; .Bregetova. 1950; 1956.
Locality: Europe - Shetland Islands; U.S.S.R.
Host: Bird - Aica torda. ...
’
’
160 -
-
Genus Larinyssus Strandtmann, 1948
.,. ,. (Fig, 76) ,. .
’;
.
,
.
.
Type: Larinyssus orbicularis Strandtmann.
Diagnosis: A medium to large mite with many small dorsal plate-
lets . There is a short peritreme but the mouthparts are mostly hidden
from above. Restricted to the nasal passages of .gulls and tern? (Lari-
’:
’’"
"
"
dae).
.
Localities: Africa - Central and South Africa. Europe - U. S. S. R.
North America United States, California, Texas.
-
Hosts: B’irds - Chlidonias leucoptera, Gelochelidon nilotica, Larus
argentatus, Larus atricilla, Larus .delawarensis, Larus dominjcanus,
Larus occidentalis. Sterna hirundo, .Sterna maxima.
(Fig. 77)
.
Type: Rallinyssus caudistigmus Strandtmann.
Diagnosis: A large species (about one mm, long) with large chelae,
a single dorsal plate, .a free membrane surrounding the anal pore, and
posterior stigmata, ,
,
Neonyssus ardeae Zumpt and Till, 1955: 63 ( d, sf and ?); Fain. 1956;
1957: 53 (illus.).
1.62 :
.
.
.
Locality: Africa Belgian Congo, Ruanda-Urundi; Union of South
-
Africa,Transvaal.
Hosts: Birds - Ardea melanocephala, Nycticorax nycticorax.
Remarks: It is quite likely that this is a synonym of Neonyssus be-
lopolskii Bregetova (Strandtmann,.,19’56: 137).
’
termedia brachyrhyncha!
"
. .
’
-
Neonyssus (Neonyssus) melloi Castro, 1948: 270 (d); Pereira and Cas-
tro. 1949; Crossley. 1952; Zu’mp.f and Till, 1955: 68’; Fain, 1957:
52. .-.. . , :.
.
Localities: Africa Union of SoutK Africa, Transvaal’. North Amer-
-
ica - United States, Texas. South America - Brazil, State of Sao Paulo.
Hosts: Birds - Columba livia (type host), Stigmatopelia senegalen-
sis, Turtur afer. ’. .’.;; "
’
.
;
Neonyssus nucifragae (Hirst)’
’ ’
Neonyssus (Neonyssus) serraoi Castro, 1948: 271 (d); Pereira and Cas-
tro, 1949; Pain, 1957.
Locality: South America - Brazil. Mato Grosso.
Host: Bird - Rhynchotus rufescens.
.
.
Locality: North America United .States, ..Texas. :
-
. .
-
Genus Rhinoecius Cooreman, 1946
.., (Fig. 79)-, ..
.
.
.
.
’:’ Type: Rhinoecius .oti Cooreman; ’.
"
’
Diagnosis: Medium to large mites, with one or more dorsal plates,
but .in which the.immoveable arm of the chela is lacking and. the move-
able arm is scimitar-shaped..
.
.. .
.
.
Rhinoecius oti1 Cooreman"
"
.
Host: Bird: - Asio ptus otus. . .
.
i Rhinoecius africanus (Zumpt and Patterson)
Rhinoecius grandis Strandtmann, 1952: 205 (d); Zumpt and Till, 1955: 90;
Pain, 1957.
Locality: North America - United States, Texas.
Host: Bird - Bubo virginianus. .
.
.
, Hhinoecius tytonis Fain ..
.
Rhinoecius tytonis gain, t95S: 394; 1957: 131 (illus.).
Locality: .Africa - Belgian Congo, Akanyaru.
Host: Bird - Tyto alba affinis. .
.
.
Genus Ruandanyssus Fain, 1957
.
Type; Ruandanyssus terpsiphonei Fain.
Diagnosis: Chela with moveable digit only; metasternal setae and
tritosternum present. .; : ’. ,
.
Ruandanyssus terpsiphonei .Fain
.
.
Hosts: Birds - Actitis hypoleucus, Arenaria interpres, Corcethia
alba (type host), Larus delawarensis, Larus atricilla, Phylomachus pug-
nax, Rhyacophilus glareola, Totanus nebularius, Tringa ocrophus.
’
.
,
Ptilonyssoides triscutatus Vitzthum, 19S5:,581 (d).
.
Neonyssus (Ptilonyssoides) triscutatus, Castro, .1948: 276; Pereira and
’
Castro.. 1949.
Neonyssus triscutatus,
’
Zumpt and
Till. 1955: 68.
Ptilonyssus triscutatus. Fain, 1956: 1.36; 1957: 121 (illus.).
Localities: Africa - Belgian Congo, Ruanda-Urundi. Europe.
Hosts: Birds - Merops apiastef, Merops persicus.
Ptilonyssus melittophagi Fain, 1956; 136 (d, 9);. 1957: 121 (illus.),
Locality: Africa - Belgian Congo, Ruanda-Urundi.
Hosts: Birds - Melittophagus lafresnayi, Melittophagus pusillus.
.
(Fig. 87)
.
. Type: Rhinonyssoides trouessarti Hirst.
Diagnosis: Medium to large mites with attenuated chelicerae, one
dorsal plate, and short peritremes.
Remarks: As this genus now stands, it includes a number of mites
from several unrelated birds. We think it is quite likely that a critical
restudy of the mites will reveal valid criteria for generic separation.
Until that time, it is best to maintain their present status.
’
Rhinonyssoides cinnyris (Zumpt and Till). New combination
’
.
-
Locality: Islands of the Pacific Ocean New Guinea;
"
.
Rhinonys soides spuzai Pereira and Castro ’
’,,’"
Locality: Islands of the Atlantic Ocean - West Indies.
" ’
.’ :"
.
. . Rhinonysaoides strandtmanni (Fain), New combination
.
.Type material ;in Musee Royal du Congo Beige.
Ptilonyssus strandtmanni Fain. 1956: 148 (d, ?); Fain, 1957: 86 (illus.).
Locality; Africa - Belgian Congo, Ruanda-Urundi.
Host: Bird - Apus caffer streubeli.
Type:
. (Fig. 88)
Dermanyssus nitzschi Giebel. By designation of Cas-
tro, 1948.
Astridiella Fain, 1357: 148; 1957: 91.
., Type: .Ptilonyssus scotornis Fain, 1956.
Diagnosis: Large, elongated nasal mites of caprimulgiforna and
certain gruiiform birds. Female .chelicera bulbous basally, greatly at-
tenuated and with minute chelae. Only one dorsal plate present, the
podosomal. With a large, well formed (although very poorly sclerotized)
174
.
.
In 1949 Pereira and Castro realized that .Neonyssus was not the
proper assignmentandplacedit in Ptilonyssus, subgenus Rhinony s s oides
Hirst. They contended that Vitznyssus Castro was not really distinct
from Rhinonyssoides Hirst and sank Vitznyssus into the synonymy. ,
Recently, Pain (1956, 1957) recovered nasal mites from caprimul-
giform birds and fqund.them .to be quite distinct in possessing a well de-
veloped tritosternum. He proposed for them the generic name Astridi-
ella, apparently unaware of the. earlier name, Vitznyssus Castro, 1948.
The Rules of Zoological .Nomenclature s.tate that generic-group names
are/coordinate. Vitznyssus .Castro is the earliest available name and
Astridiella Fain, 1957 must be a junior synonym.
Fain also had proposed (19S7: 93) that, because the type,specimen
ofDermanyssus nitzschi is lost and that the description isinqn-diagn-ostic,
the name nitzschi Giebel should be deleted from the literature. This is
both impossible and undesirable; impossible under, the Rules and unde-
sirable because it would ’destroy the first name given to a bird nasal
mite. It seems that the logical solution would be,to use the available
names and to designate’a iectotype to replace the lost. type ofGiebel’s.
Ordinarily the Iectotype would be the species, on which Fain. based
his genus Astridiella, i. e^., Astrj.dielia scotornis (Fain) <=Ptilonyssu3
scotornis Fain), but this is deemed undesirable by us because Fain has
designated two types for this species, "Holes: Scotornis fossil welwit-
schi Boc. a Muhero, pres .d’Astrida, en decembre 1955 (ancien type).
a 1’Akanyaru (Ruanda Urundi) Ie 3-3-1956 et en fevrier 1956; Caprimul-
gus tristigma Rupp ’a l’Akanyaru;le. 6-3-1956(oouv.eautype cidessus). .. "
(Fain, 1957: 96). It would seem more desirable to designate as Iecto-
type a species that has only one type designation and in which the type
host is identical with the host of..the original species. This would be
Fain’s second species of Astrldiella, A_. .caprimulgi [Pain, 1957; 98,
"Hotes: Caprimulgus .europaeus L. a 1’Akanyaru Ie 24-2-1956 (type) ..."].
Hence: Dermanyssus nitzschi Giebel becomes Vitznyssus nitzschi
(Giebel); Aatridiella Pain, .1957 becomes a,synonym of Vitznyssus Cas-
175
Rhinonyssus nitzschi, Vitzthum; 1.935-.-572 (d, illus.). (In part; not Der-
manyssus nitzschi Giebel.)
. ..; .
"
Astridiella Vttzthumi Fain, 1957:.’,95,’ 127; .
-Locality: Europe. ;.<.
.
.
....... .
:’"
’
(Pig., 89).. ;"^
’!
.: ’ Type: Neonyssus (Paraneonys:sus)..enrietti Castro.
.
Diagnosi’s: Mites of medium size; two dorsal plate’s, the’posterior
longer but-narrower than. the anterior; chelicerae barely or not at all
attenuatedi -efielae very small... Parasitic only in passeriform birds.
.
.
.
Paraneonyssmg capitatus. Strandtmann, 1956:. 133 (d, ?..iUus,). ’
.
.
.
Locality: Africa - Belgian Congo, Ruanda-Urundi; Union of South
Africa,. Cape..Province,
.
Hosts: Birds - Dryoscopus. cubia (type host). Tchagra .senegala,
,
Ptilonyssus emberizae Fain. 195’6:;-l40 (d, rf and ?); P.ain, 1957: 95 (il-
lus.).
Locality: Africa - Belgian Congp, Ruanda-Urundi.
Host: Bird - Emberiza.flaviventris. .
.
.
Ptilonyssus (Paraneonyssus) hirsti, Pereira and Castro, 1949.
Ptilonyssus hirsti. Zumpt and Till, 1955; Fjiin, 1956: 1.40; 1957:. 86.
Ptilonyssus nudus Trouessart, in part; the male as described by Ber-
lese, 1889; the female as described by Hirst. 1923.
Localities: Africa - Belgian Congo, Ruanda-Urundi. Europe-Eng-
land; Italy; Portugal. North America - United States, Texas. South
America - Brazil.
Hosts: Birds - Passer domesticus. Passer ugandae griseus.
.
Ptilonyssus calamocichlae Fain
’
Ptilonyssus orientalis (Swing)
.
Locality: Africa - Belgian Congo, Akanyaru.
Host: Bird - Zpsterops senegalensis.
Ptilonyssus (Ptilonyssus) sairae Castro, 1948: 260 (d); Pereira and Cas-
tro, 1949; Zumpt and Till, 1955: 89; Fain, 1957. " :"
.
Locality:’ South America - Brazil, State of Sao Paulo. ...-.;
Host: Bird - Tangara seledon. .-."
.
Locality: South America - Brazil.
Host: Bird - Procnias alba.
Ptilonyssus yiduae Fain, 1956: 147 (d, 9); 1957: 120 (iilus..).. .
of form has caused taxonomic difficulty at the generic and specific levels..
No less than-seven-generic names have been proposed for what is per-
haps really only one genus, although two genera are recognized here.
As far back as 1910, Oudemans gave a. page and a half of synonyms, for
Spinturnix vespertilioni-s alone, a. name that has been ruled invalid by
the International Commission.
.
We.list the species we have .found in the literature without any claim
at complete coverage or of correct or complete synonymy.
.
.
Spinturnix myoti Kolenati,. 1856; Aldrich, 1936: 29.
.Localities: Africa. Asia - U.S. S.R. Europe..
.
Hosts: Mammals - Various species of Chi’roptera, the most .com-
monly parasitized forms, being Myotis spp., but according to Bregetova
(1956) including also Plecotus auritus, Rhinolophus ferrum-equinum,
Vespertilio seratinua.
Remarks: The above references are only the highlights. Oudemans
(1910; 1936) gives the. most .complete summary of references and syno-
nyms. Aldrich (1936) gives the reasons for,.invalidating the name ves-
pertilionis.
.. .
. .
,. Spinturnix antipodjanus Hirst
.
.
Spinturnix antipodianua Hirst, 1931: 563 (d); Radford, 1950.
Locality: Australia - North C’ue’ensland. :
Host: Mammal - "Bat.". , .
.
Spinturnix araguensis Vitzthum
.
Locality; Africa - Kenya.
; Host: Mammal - Eidolon helvum.
Remarks: Zumpt (1951: 80) regarded kenyaensis as a synonym of
S. lateralis but we are retaining it here.
Type material in the Natal Museum. South Africa; also in the South
African Institute for Medical Research.
Spinturnix lawrencei Zumpt, 1951:’ 81 (d).
Locality: Africa - Union of South Africa, Natal.
Host: Mammal - Myotis tricolor.
Locality. ? GUolo.
Host: Mammal - Macroglossus minimus.
188
Spinturnix murinus-CWalckenaer.)
.
Remarks: Oudemans (1910) gives a page of’synonymy for this mite,
covering the period from 1832-19.02.- ;: .: :.. ; ; ."
.
Type material in the ; collection of-the South’ Australian Museum.
Spinturnix novae-hollandae Hirst, 193i: 564 (d); Radtord, 1950.
Locality: Australia - South Australia. .: .; ,. ; .’
.
Host: Mammal "Bat.." :; ’. :..’.
’
. -’ : ’::
.
.
,
.
, . :’ Spinturnix :omahonyi Turk.
. .
.
.
Host: Mammal - Pipistrellus stampflii.. ’.
.
Spinturnix plecotihus (Koch)
’
’
’
’
Spinturnix scotdphili Zumpt and Till
’. . ’"’
.
Locality: ?
Host; ....;?. . ;.
.
...’ . : ’-’:. "’.’:- ’
"’
’"’
-Periglischrus africanus Zumpt ...
.
,..
.
.
.
^
.
,
’
’
Locality: .?.. ;. .,
..
.
.
? ": ":" ’""
Host: . .
1957. . ,
Periglischrus meridensis Hirst. 1927: 323 (d); Radford. 1950; Tibbetts,
’
fast organs flanking .the anus. The sternal plate is divided into a pair
of anterior lateral plates and a pair of posterior lateral plates that are
fused with the endopodal plates. Body setae are short and stout; claws
are weak. .’’. ’::
Most members of the family are phoretic on insects. .One .species
has been found on snakes. It is discussed below.
.
. . .:
.
Locality: Europe - England.
,
.
Host: Reptile - Epicrates cenchris.
Remarks: This mite was found under the ventral scales of the host.
The host had been collected from the region of the Upper Amazon in South
America. The mites were.discovered in the Zoological. Society Gardens,
"
’
London.
, There are anumber of species in the genus Heterozercon, but oude-
mansi is the only one recorded as parasitizing a vertebrate/and therefore
is the only one included in’ this manual, ,., : ,,’.’’:. :.. ,..,.,,,.,. ,.,.., .,^ ..
.
.
r,,’,’.,’
’
..
...’Type:7. Celaenppspj.degbulolgehs.ig.Giinther,’;. 19
. ,8.7.,;
193
.
.
.
Alphalaelaps aplodontiae, Radford, ’1951: 201. ".
Locality: North America - United States, ’Washington State.
Host: Mammal - Aplodontia rufa.
Remarks: Aplodontia is an unusual and apparently phylogenetically
isolated rodent. All ectoparasites reported from it are also unsual.
,
’ "-Type: Manisilaelaps coronis Lavoipierre, .Type by mono-
’
’
’
,’ ’^\.
’
^py- .., ;. .:
Diagnosis: Female’sternal plate large.; rectangular; epigynial plate
very:saort. extending only to the posterior bor’der of c’oxae IV, but rounded
posteriorly and with two setae on the posterior margin.
.
: .: (Fig.-95)
Myonyssoides spinosus DeMeillon and Lavoipierre, 1944: @3, .
turMcidae. ..
spintumicid; and the .mouthparts are not modified as are those of Spin-
.
’
.
.
.
.. . Genus Ugandolaelaps Radford, 1942 . .
(Fig. 96)
Type: Ugandolaelaps protoxera Radford.
Diagnosis: Female epigynial shield greatly expanded behind coxae
.
IV and joined’to the anal pla’te. Only the genital setae are on the epi-
196
tion data relating to it does not preclude such a possibility. It was taken
on three occasions from snakes of three different genera (Platyplectrurug
madurensis. Uropeltis pulnejensia and Teretr.urus rhodogaster) in Kodi-
kanal, India. Members of the superfamily Celaenopsoidea, to which it
belongs, are free-living or associated with insects. However, species
ofOphiomegistus are parasitic on snakes and belong to a related super-
family (Antennophoroidea) whose other members are associated with
arthropods. In this case, however, the parasitic nature of Ophiomegis-
tus cannot be disputed. They have been observed with their chelicerae
inserted beneath the. scales of their hosts (Camin, personal communi-
cation). We prefer "to have more definite evidence of a parasite-host
relationship between I. lindbergi and the reptiles before including it as
a parasite.
Conclusion
DISTRIBUTION
.
.
The distribution and presence of the external bird-, mites depends
largely upon a continuous source of food for the mite. If one assumes
the nest of some wild bird to become infested with a few mites just at
the time the first egg is laid, then during the period of .incubation, plus
the period before the young leave the. nest. a tremendous population of
mites can be built up. Yet, after the young have flown-and the parent
birds leave the area, all of these mites will diminish in abundance, and
perhaps die long before the birds return the following year. Presumably,
if the grown birds divest themselves completely of any.hpldover nest-
mites, there should be no mites like Ornithonyssus sylviarum, 0. bur-
sa, or Dermanyssus gallinae in nests of strictly sylvan areas. The dis-
tribution of these mites, then, is probably determined by a continuous
population of indigenous birds such as house sparrows, pigeons, and do-
mestic fowl, and all migratory birds very probably become infested with
these mites through contamination-from such permanent residents.
It would seem .that the distribution of mites of mammals should be
continuous and uniform over the range, of their hosts. Here is a situa-
tion in which nests, or at least burrows, are constantly occupied and the
host itself provides a microhabitat. of constant temperature and fairly
uniform relative humidity. If we take, for example, the mite Laelaps
J.99
have recently reported many. species from the U.S.S.R. and it seems
assured that many more will be reported in the future’. Japanese and
Americans are discovering more and more species in-Korea, Manchuria
and Siam. as well as in Indonesia, Japan, and .the Islands of the Pacific.
Australia has not yet recorded.more .than a fraction of the species it is
bound to have. One reason for the scarcity of records is that prior to
World’War II practically all. acarological work in Asia. the Pacific Is--
lands, and Australia was devoted to the Trombiculidae.
South America has a fairly complete list only from Brazil, chiefly
through the efforts of Fonseca, and of Pereira and de Castro. Except
for these workers. South America does not seem to have any native aca-
rologists interested in the .Mesostigmata. Most of the re-cords, outside
of Brazil were contributed by foreign scientists. .:
ual to indicate what mites are known in the various political divisions.
and (2) we do not have enough data to provide meaningful ecological dis-
tributions.
’FAUNAL LIST
NORTH AMERICA
Alaska .’. .
.
Laelaps alaskensis, L. pachypus, Haemogamasus alaskensis, H. am-
bulans, Orthohalarachhe diminuata.
Canada
Mexico
Uriited States
Haemolaelaps casalis, H. geomys, H. glasgowi, H. morlani, Eubrachy-
laelaps eircularis, E_. crowei. E. debilis, E. hollisteri, Gigantolaelaps
cricetidarum, Steptolaelaps liomydis,. Laelaps multispinosus, L. nut-
talli, L. oryzomydis, L; pachypus, Echinolaelaps echidninus, Ornitho-
nyssus americanus, 0. bacoti, 0. burs.a, 0. sylviarum, Ichoronyssus
crosbyi, I_. longisetosus, I_. quadridentatus. L robustipes, Ophionyssus
natricis. Hirstionyssus affinis, H. arcuatus, H. breviseta, H. carnifex,
H. cynomys, II. geomydis, H. hilli, H. mcomptus, H. isabellinus. H.
neotomae, H. obsoletus, H. occidentalis, H. staffordi, H. triacanthus,
Neoichoronyssus dentipes, N. wernecki, Patrinyssus hubbardi, Steato-
nyssus ceratognathus, S. occidentalis. Pellonyssus passeri, Alloderma-
nyssus sanguineus, Dermanyssus americanus, D. brevis, D. evotomy-
202
CENTRAL AMERICA
Canal Zone
SOUTH AMERICA .
Argentina
Bolivia
Bolivilaelaps- tricholabiatus.
Brazil
Chile
.. ; ,. ’. Columbia
Ecuador
Tur uniscutatus.
’ ’ ’Peru .
Surinam .
.
Gigantolaelaps versteegi, Laelaps nuttalli.
, i’ Uruguay
Venezuela
EUROPE
’British Isles
Corsica
Spinturnix euryalis.
France
Germany
Haemolaelaps casalis, H. fahrenhoizi, H. glasgowi, Laelaps arvico-
lae, L. hilaroides, \^. multispinosus, L. muris, L, pachypus, Ornith-
onyssus bacoti, 0. ondatrae, .0. sylviarum, Ichoronyssus diversipilus.
L lepidopeltis, I. mohrae, I. spinosus, Hirstionyssus arcuatus, H.
blanchardi, H. carnifex, H. isabellinus, H. pachypus, H. pauli, Steato-
nyssus musculi, S. murinus, £[. spinosus, Dermanyssus .gallinae, D.
quintus, Eulaelaps nbvus, K. oribatoides, E. stabularis, Haemogamasus
ambulans, H. avisugus, H. hirsutosimiiis,’ H. hirsutus, H. horridus,
H. oudemansi, Neonyssus nucifragae, Ptilonyssus echinatus, Spinturnix
murinus, S. plecotinus,
205
Hungary
Steatonyssus murinus.
Italy
Netherlands ’’’
Haemolaelaps casalis, H. glasgowi, Laelaps arvicolae, L. muns, JL.
pachypus, laMoronyssus lep.idopelti.8, Ophi,onyssus natricis, Hirstionys-
sus arcuatu’s/ H. ca.rnifex, H. isabellinus, Steatonyssus cyclaspts, S.
musculi. Dermanyssus gallinae, D’. hirundinis, Myonyssus decurnani,
M. gigas, Haemogamasus ambulans, H. hirsutus, H. horridus, Spin-
turnix murinus, S. plecotinus.
’
Norway ’
’
’
Ornithonyssus bacoti, Eulaelaps stabularis. ; .
.
Portugal
’; ’’i Sardinia
’
.
. ’. -.: ,,,Spain.,; .
.
’.. Switzerland
’
.’’,’.
Echinolaelaps echidninus, Eulaelaps stabularis, Haemogamasus ambu-
lans.
Yugoslavia
ASIA
Bhutan’
Laelaps bhutanensis.
Burma
Haemolaelaps traubi.
China
India
Korea
Malaya
Manchuria
Siam
Ptilonyssus orientalis.
207
..U.S.S..R.
Haemolaelaps androgynus, H; angustiscu.tis, H. casalis, H. .ellobii, H.
longipes, H. glasgowi, H. razunji’pvae, H. semidesertus, Laelaps agilis,
L. agrarius, L. algericus, L. arvalis, L. caucasicus, L. clethriono-
mydis, L. ekstremi, L. hilaris, L. jettmari, L. kolpakovae, L. lemni,
L. inicromydis, L. mosquensis, L. multispmosus, L. muris, L. novi-
kovae, L. nuttalli. L. pachypus, L. pavlovskyi, L. pitymydis, L. semi-
tectus, L. volgensLs, Oryctolaelaps bibikovae, Echinolaelaps echidninus,
Ornithonyssus bacoti, 0. sylviarum, Q. dogieli, Ichoronyssus Havus,
I. lepidopeltis, Sauronyssus saurarum,;. Ophionyssus natricis, 0. vari-
abllis, Hirstionyssus arcuatus, H. .blanchardi, H. bregetovae, H. car-
nifex. H. confucianus, H. cric.eti, H.. ellobii, H. eusoricis, H. evers-
manni~H-- georgicus, H7 isabelli.n.ui, H.. macedonicus, H. meridianus,
H. musculi, H. pachypus, H. pauli, H. sciurinus, H. soricis, H. trans-
iliensis, Steatonyssus musTuli, S. superans, Pellonyssus viator, AUo-
dermanyssus sanguineus, Dernaanyssus gallinae, D. hirundinis, D. qum-
tus, IVlyonyssus decumani, M. dubinini, M. gigas, M. ingricus, M.
rossicus, Eulaelaps stabularis, E. cricetuli, E. kolpakovae, Haemo-
gamasus ambulans, H. hirsutus, H. citelli, H. dauricus, H. hirsuto-
sinnlis, H. horridus~ H. ivanovi,~H. kitano.i,.-.’H. :kusurnotoi, H, lipo-
nyssoides, H. mandschuricus, H. nidiforines. ~H.. pontiger, H. serd-
jukovae. H. zachvatkini, Haillietia auris. Rhinonyssus caledonicus, R.
coniventris, R. minutus, R. rhinoletbrum, R. waterstoni, Larinys-
sus orbicularis, Rallinyssus caudistigmus, Neonyssus belopolskii, N.
nucifragae, Sternostoma tracheacolum, .Ptilonyssus nudus, -Spinturnix
~
" r
murinus, S. myoti.
ASIA MINOR
Arabia
Israel
AFRICA
. .
Ethiopia (Abyssinia) ’’; :
Algena ’ _’;
Laelaps algericus, L. oraniensis, Echinolaelaps bakeri, Steatonyssus
rourinus. . . .’ ’;
British Somaliland
Echinolaelaps muricpla.
Egypt
French Guinea
Derrnanyssus hirundinis.
Haemolaelaos mauritanicus.
Gambia
Spinturnix aethiopicus.
Gold Coast
Echinola^laps. niuricola.
Kenya
’.
’
’; ’ ’
Liberia. ’
’
’. ’
-
,
.
Laelaps liberiensis, Echinolaelaps giganteus, Ornithonyssus bacoti,
Hristionyssus liberiensis, Haeroogamasus liberiensis.
Morocco
’
Steatonyssus viator, Derrnanyssus gallinae.
210
Natal
Nigeria . .. .
’1 Nyasatao.d ’. "
’:...’.. ..’
Laelaps laniborni, Echinolaelaps muricola, Ornithonysaus aethiopicus,
.0. bursa, Steatonyssus nyassae, LiporiyssQldes muris^
’ ’..;
1
Rhodesia
.
.
Haemolaelaps rhodesiensis, H. Yillosissimus, Hamertonia bedfordt.
Sierra Leone
Spinturnix pipistrellus.
Sudan
Tanganyika
Uganda
West Africa
AUSTRALIA
Franz-Joseph Land
Orthohalarachne rosmari.
, Bahamas
... Bermuda . .
.. . :
.
.
Laelaps nuttalli. ; . . .. : : . ; ’.
.."., ..’ "" ".
’
Cuba
Falkland Islands . .
.
Orthohalarachne magellanica.; .
^
Greenland
. Iceland ,.
^
.
.
.
Haenaogamasus ambulans.
Jamaica
Puerto Rico . . . »
Ceylon
’
. ,
.
.
Laelaps atypicus, L. nuttalli, L. taprobanius, L. thompsoni, Echino-
laelaps echidninus, Liponysspides muris.
Comoro Islands
Ornithonyssus bursa.
213
Madagascar
..
.
Zanzibar
.
INDONESIA . . .
.
Laelaps soricis, Ornithonyssus bursa.
Borneo
E chinolaelap s echidninus.
Celebes
Spinturnix jordani.
Java
Sumatra
Formosa
Guam
’
Permariyssus gallinae. "
" .’.". ’... ;;:
Hawaii
Japan
.’ 1
.
,
Juan Fernandez’Islands
.
Lady Julia Percy Island
Orthohalarachne reflexa. ..
Marquesas ’Islands
New. Zealand .
.
.
Trichosurolaelaps crassipes, Ornithonyssus bacoti, Dermanyssus gal-
linae ; ’!’
Ocean Island
Philippines
Pribilof islands
;
Orthohalarachne attenuata. ’
’
.
215
Echiriolaelaps echidninus. ., ’
Spinturnix lavellanus,
.Hosts
each class, the orders are listed phylogenetically, starting .with .the .most
primitive, and under each order the genera’and species or common names
are listed alphabetically. The latter appear in quotations. Under each
host species, the mite parasites are’listed in the same order as they ap-
pear in the text. ...:,, ;.
All of the host records are given as they appeared-uithe reviewed pub-
lications. No attempt was made to combine synonyms or to give the
probable scientific name for hosts that were recorded only by the com-
mon name.
HOST L-IST
MAMMALIA
Marsupialia
Laelaps sminthopsis.. .
Ornithonyssus braziliensis
"Bandicoot"
Haemolaelaps marsupialis
Metachirops opossum ,
Gigantolaelaps goy.anensis
Heferplaelaps antipodianus
Mesolaelaps australiensis "Opossum" ;
.
M.’ anomalus .. Echinolaelaps echidninus
Ornithonyssus bnrsa Ornithonys sus bacoti
Neoparala’elaps bandicoota Eulaelaps’’ stabularis
Hirstionyssus obsoletus
"Elephant shrew" Haemogamasus occidentalis
Orn ithonys sus aethiopicus
Steatonyssus nyassae Neurotrichus gibbsi
Hirstionyssus arcuatus
"Maryland shrew"
Haemogamasus liponyssoides Paras calops breweri
Hirstionys sus arcuatus
Mogera robusta Haemogamasus liponyssoides
Laelaps clethrionomydis
Oryctolaelaps bibikovae Scalopus aquaticus
Haemolaelaps glasgowi
"Mole" Haem ogamasu s harperi
Hirstionyssus arcuatus H. liponyssoides
218
Haemogsmasus horridus
.
Scapanus latimanus
Haenaolaelap’6- glasgowi .’.t’.’J. Sorex obscurus ’-
.
Laelaps pachypus
Scapanus orarius
Haemogamasus occidentalis Sorex-’palustris ;
.. ;
-
Haenaogamasus ambulans
Scapanus townsendi H. liponyssoides -.’:. .,;
Haemolaelaps glasgowi
Haemogamasus occidentalis Sorex trowbridgei
Hirstionyssus obsoletus
Scaptochirus gilliesi Haemogamasus occidentalis
Haemogamasus mandschuricus H. keegani
.
H. barberi ’; .’. ? Laelaps, paehypus
.
Haemogamasus liponyssoides
Talpa alpina
Solenodon paradoxus Haemogamasus hirsutus
.
Steatonyssus spinosus H. horridus .’
H. nidi
H_. liponyssoides. .’.’.., "Townsend mole"
Haemogamasus ambulans
"Tikoes moende"
Laelaps soricis Urotrichus talpoides
Haemogamasus quadrisetatus
Chiroptera
-
Steatonyssus sudaqensisi^ Ichoronyssus flavus ,..>.
’
.
Haemogamasus ambuians .
Myotis lucifugus
:.
Rhinolophus blasii
Pipistrellus sp. Periglischrus inter ruptus
Steatonyssus murinus
Rhinolophus clivosus
Pipistrellus kuhlii Macronyssus longimanus
Steatonyssus murinus Ichoronyssus leprosus
I. scutatus
Pipistrellus nanus Periglischrus glutinimargo
Steatonyssus eos
Spinturnix walkerae Rhinolophus euryale
Spinturnix euryalis
Pipistrellus pipistrellus
Hirstesia britteni Rhinolophus ferrum-equinum
Steatonyssus cyclaspis (= R. hippocrepis)
S. murinus Haemolaelaps glasgowi
Ornithonyssus tinae
Pipistrellus stampflii Ichoronyssus scutatus
Spinturnix pipistrellus Spinturnix euryalis
S. psi
Plecotus auritus S. oudemansi
Steatonyssus murinus S. myoti
Spinturnix plecotinus Periglischrus hipposiderus
S. myoti
Rhinolophus geoffroyi
Pteropus aegyptiacus Ornithonys sus rhinolophi
Spinturnix lateralis Spinturnix viduus
222
Rhinolophus hipposideros
Spinturnix omahoriyi Vespertilio auraus
"
.
Hirstesia steriialis’’ ’ ’" Ichoronyssus flavus
:
’
’
Rhinolophus lobatus
’
Vespertilio dasycneme
Ichoronyssus jacksont Hirstionyssus arcuatus
Vespertilio rnurinus
Rhinopoma microphyllum Hirstionyssus arcuatus
Spinturnix zeiebori Ichoronyssus spinosus
Ichoronyssus lepidopeltis I. flavus
Primates
Cercopithecus schmidti
Pneumonyssus duttoni Macaca mulatta (=Pithecusthesus)
Pneumonyssus dinoiti
Cercopithecus; ascanius P. simicola .
Rhinophaga cercopitheci
.
Rhinophaga papionis
Galago alleni
Haemolaelap.s galagus
Hirstionyssus ngami Papio ursinus . .
.
Pneumonyssus. santos-diasi
Galago senegalensis P. mossambicensis
Ornrthonyssus galagus
Edentata
Euphractus sexcinctus
Dasyponyssus neivai
Pholidota
Lagomorpha
Ochotona schisti-ceps
Lepus californicus Hirstionyssus occidentalig
Haemolaelaps .glasgowi Myonyssus montanus
Sylvilagus auduboni.
Ochotona daurica Haemolaelaps glasgowi
Haemolaelaps glasgowi Brevisterna morlani
Eulaelaps cricetuli
E. kolpakovae
Haemogamasus mandschuricus Sylvilagus minensis
H.. kitanoi .
Ornithonys sus braziliensis
.
Ochotona pusilla "Texas cottontail"’
Haemolaelaps;;glasgowi .Echinolaelaps echidninus
Rodentia
"
"
caharinis , Eulaelaps .cricetuli’:;,
Ornithonyssus bacoti E. kolpakovae
.
Allodermanyssus sanguineus
A_. aegyptius Alticola argentatus
Allodermanyssus sanguineus
Acornys russatus
Allodermanyssus sanguineus Ammospermophilus leucurus
:
Haemolaelaps glasgowi
Acomys dimidiatus ".
Allodermanyssus sanguineus Anomalurus fraseri
Haemolaelaps spatuliformis
Aethomys chrysophilus
Laelaps vansomereni Aplodontia rufa
Echinolaelaps muricola Patrinyssus hubbardi
Alphalaelaps aplodontiae
Aethomys namaguensis
Laelaps yansomereni Apodemus sp.
Laelaps pachypus
"African rat" Haemogamasus arobulans
Laelaps yansomereni
Apodemus agrarius .’’
’
Akodon mollis Haemolaelaps fahren’hoizi
Eubraclr^laelaps rotundus H. glasgowi
Laelaps agilis
Alactagulus^ acontion L_. algericus
Haemolaelapa semidesertus L_. }ettmari~
Eulaelaps stabularis
E. kolpakovae L_. pavlovskyi
Hirstionyssus arcuatus.
Haemogamasus crtelli H. arvicolae
H. isabellinus
"Alaska short-tailed mouse" H. musculi
Haemogamasus ambulans Eulaelaps stabularis
"Albemarle Haemogamasus ambulans
meadow mouse"
H. dauricus
Haemogamasus barberi H. ellipsoideus
H. hirsutosimilis
H. horridus
Allactaga elater
Haemolaelaps semidesertus
" H. kusumotoi
H. liponyssoides
H. mandschuricus
Allactaga jaculus
Haemolaelaps semidesertus H_. nidT
H. serdjukovae
226
’
.
,
Laelaps agilis I^_. mosquensis
’
.
L. caucasicus L^. volgensis .,.
L. mosquensis ’. . Ornit.honyssus bacoti
Hirstionyssus arcuatus Hirstionyssua arcuatus
H. carnifex H. isabellinus.^.
-
.
H. isabeUinus ’ ’. H. musculi
H^inusculi- Allodermanyssus .sanguineus
’
"
’
Myonyssua decumani Myonyssus decumani ... .
Haemogamasus ambulans
~
Eulaelaps stabularis
H. hirsutosimilis~ Haemogamasus ambulans
H. hjrsutus H. hirsutosimilis
H. nidi H. hirsutus
.
H. horridus
Apodemus fulvipectus H. mandschuricus
Laelaps agilis H. nidi
L. caucasicus
Arvicanthis abyssinicus
Apodemus geisha
"
Haemolaelaps arvicanthis
Eulaelaps stabularis "
H. murinns .:,,.
.
Haemogamasus mandschuricus Echinolaelaps giganteua
H. zulu
Laelaps keegani
Apodemus sylvaticus L_.^ lamborni- .
Atherurus africanus
Rhmophaga atheruri Choeromys gregorianus
R. leopoldi Echinolaelaps muricola
.
Haemolaelaps glasgowi Hirstionyssus crieeti .
..,,.
Citellus beecheyi Citellus tridecemlineatus
Haemolaelaps glasgowi Haemolaelaps glasgowi :
.
Eulaelaps citellus
Citellus undulatus
Citellus citellus Haemolaelaps glasgowi .
-
Citellus columbianus Hirstionyssus obsoletus
Haemolaelaps glasgowi
Clethrionomys amurensis
Citellus dauricus Haemogamasu-s ambulans.
Eulaelaps stabularis H. mands fchur icu s
Citellus dauricus Clethrionomys frater
Haemogamasus kusumotoi Laelaps clethrioriomydis
Hirstionyssus transiliensis
Citellus lateralis
Haemolaelaps glasgowi Clethrionomys gapperi.
Hirstionyssus occidentalis Haemogamasus alaskensis
H. ambulans
Citellus major H. liponyssoides
Hirstionyssus crieeti
Clethrionomys glareolus
Citellus mexicanus Haemolaelaps fahrenhoizi
Haemolaelaps glasgowi H. glasgowi
Ornithonys sus bacoti
’
Laelaps agilis ’ :
.
L_. clethrionomydis
Citellus mollis L. hilaris ;
Haemolaelaps glasgowi L_. pachypus
Hirstionyssus arcuatus
Citellus pygmaeus H. carnifex
Haemolaelaps androgynus Myonyssus ingricus
H. glasgowi Eulaelaps stabularis
.
.
H. longipes Haemogamasus ambulans
H. semidesertus H_. hirsutosimilis
Hirstionyssus crieeti H. hirsutus
Haemogamasus citelli H. horridus
Eulaelaps kolpakovae H. nidi
’
.
Eulaelaps stabularis
Haemogamasus ambulans Cricetulus griseus
H. dauricus Laelaps jettmari
H. liponyssoides
’
H. mandschuricus ’
Cricetulus migratorius
-
.
H. serdjukovae ’."’ Haemolaelaps glasgowi
Laelaps ekstremi
Clethrionomys rutilus L_. jettmari
Haemolaelaps glasgowi Allodermanyssus sanguineus
Laelaps clethrionomydis Eulaelaps stabularis
Hirstionyssus isabellinus Haemogamasus nidi
Myonyssus dubinini ’
’
Eulaelaps stabularis Cricetulus triton
Haemogamasus ambulans Haemolaelaps glasgowi
H. ellipsoideus Hirstionyssus criceti
H_. nidi Eulaelaps stabularis
Haemogamasus dauricus
Coelomys bi color H. mandschuricus
Laelaps atypicus
Cricetus auratus
Cpelogenys p-acca Hirstionyssus criceti
Haemolaelaps coelogenys
Cricetus cricetus
"Cotton mouse" Haemolaelaps glasgowi
Ornithoriyssus bacoti Hirstionyssus criceti
Eulaelaps stabularis Eulaelaps stabularis
’
Haemogamasus liponyssoides Haemogamasus nidi
Cricetomys sp.
Echinolaelaps muncola Crocidura manni
Haemolaelaps hystrici
Cricetulus barabensis
’
Haemolaelaps glasgowi Crocidura olivieri
Hirstionyssus criceti Haemolaelaps murinus
Eulaelaps cricetuli H_. zulu
E. stabularis Laelaps algericus
Haemogamasus ambulans L. nuttalli
230
.
Cryptomys capensis H. incomptus
Haemolaelaps cryptomiug Ischyropoda furmani, ’. ’.
’
Cryptomys natalensis Dipus sowerbyi ,
;;
Haemolaelaps natalensis Haemogamasus mandschuricus
Eulaelaps cricetuli
Ctenodactylus gundi
’
Steatonyssus murinus "Domestic mice"
Allodermanyssus sanguineus
C-ynomys sp. .
.’’;,: :.
Hirstionyssus cynpmys’ ’.’ "Domestic rat"
Ornithonyssus bacoti
Cynomys gunnisoni Dermanyssus gallinae
Haemolaelaps glasgowi .;.:;’ Eulaelaps stabularis
Brevisterna morlani
Dyromys nitedula
Cynomys ludoviclanus Ornithonyssus dogieli
Haemolaelaps glasgowi
Hirstionyssus blarichardi
Echiroys sp.
Gigantolaelaps gilmorei
. Dasymys helukus G_. oudemansi
Haemolaelaps dasymys
Ellobius fuscocapillus
Dasymys incomtus Haemolaelaps ellobii .
.
.
Haemolaelaps ro:auritani’cus Steptolaelaps’heteromys’
-’-* ’’:-
’ .
Gerbillus-faanus ’.. ’"’.:.’ Holochilus sciurei^s’,. .
Haemolaelaps insculptus Liponyssoidea. brasilietisis
’
Gigantolael’aps ’mattogrossensis
Gerbillus pyramidum
Haemolaelaps aegyptius Holochilus vulpinus
H. insculptus Gigantolaelaps mattogrossensis
G, bracRyspinosus
Gerbillus quadrimaculatus Laelaps manguinhosi : ;
.
.
Haemolaelaps aegyptiu’s ..
"House mouse"
Glaucomys sp. Laelaps hilaris
Haemogamasus ambulans Ornithonyssus bacoti
Hirstionyssus carnifex
Glauconays sabrinus Eulaelaps stabularis
Haeniogaitiasus ambulans Haemogamasus ambulans
Kerodon spixi
"Hamsters" Lepronyssoides pereirai
Ornithonyssus. bacoti Cavilaelaps braziliensis
Heliosciurus rufobrachiatus
Hirstionyssus libertensis’ Lagurus curtatus
Hirstionyssus isabellinus
Hapalotis sp.
Laelaps hapaloti Lagurus lagurus
: Haemolaelaps ellobii ;
.
.
Meriones erythrourus !
Haemolaelaps angustiscuUs Microtus sp.
H_. longipes ; . Laelaps alaskenais
’-Hirstionyssus meridianus Haeinogamajsus-aiaskensis
Eulaelaps stabularis H. ambulans
.
H. glasgowi
Meriones meridianus ’..’.. . Laelapa arvalis
Hacaiolaelaps longipes L^. hilaris
Hirst! onyssus meridianus L_.pachy pus
Eulaelaps stabularis Haemogamasus ambulans
H. nidi
Meriones persicus
Haeinolaelaps androgynus Miorotus amphibius
H. gl’asgowi - Laelaps arvicolae
niuns*"
.i Allodernianyssus sanguineus L.
Eulaelaps stabularis L. pachypus
Microdipodops megacephalus
Ischyropoda furmani Microtus brandti
Haemolaelaps glasgowi
Microdipodops pallidus Eulaelaps kolpakovae
Ischyropoda furmani Hae mogamasu s mands churieus
Micromys minutus
Haemolaelaps glasgowi .
Microtus breweri
Laelaps micromydis ’
Haemolaelaps glasgowi
235
.
Laelaps pachypus
Haemogamasus ambulans Microtus mordax
Haemolaelaps glasgowi
Microtus carruthersi Laelaps pachypus
Haemogamasus ivanovi Haemogamasus liponyssoides
’
’. . ..
’
. .
.
Eulaelaps cricetuli H, murinus
E. stabularis H. reticulatus
Haembgamasus ambulans iH. semidesertus
JH,zulu
"Mouse" Laelaps algericus
.
Echinolaelaps giganteus L. hilaris
E. muricola L, lambdrni . :
Haemogamasus barberi L^. nuttalli :
Mus sp.
t^. sicula
Echinolaelaps echidninus
.
Gigantolaelaps versteegi Ornithonyssus bacoU
G. wolffsohni Hirstionyssus arcuatus
Mysolaelaps rothschildi H. butantanensia
H. carriifex
Mus agrarius H. isabellinus.
Laelaps jettmarj^ H. musculi
Steatonyssus musculi
Mus algericus Allodermanyssus sanguineus
Laelaps algericus ’.;;’: Myonyssus decumani
Eulaelaps kolpakovae
Mus chrysophilus. . E, stabularis
Laelaps vansomereni Haemogamasus ambulans
Echinolaelaps muricola H. hirsutus
Mus musculus (contd.) Myospalax dybowskii (contd.)
Haemogamasus nidi Eulaelaps stabularis
H. oudemansi Haemogamasus dauricus
’
Allodermanyssus aegyptius Myospalax scansus
Lipohyssoidea muris Hirstionyssus confuscianus
Mus rattus
Echinolaelaps echidninua
Ornithonyssus bacoti
Mystromys albicaudatus
Haemolaelaps mystromys
H. davisi
.
Hirstionyssus carnifex’
Allodermanyssus aegyptius Napeozapus insignis
Lippnyssoides muris Haemoiaelaps glasgowi
Haemogamasus alaskensis
Mus silaceus
Echinolaelaps muricola Nectomys squamipes
Gigantolaelaps goyanensis
Mus sylvaticus G_. oudemansi
Haemolaelaps fahrenholzi Ornithonys sus braziliensis
Laelaps muris ..
Haemogamasus horridus Neofiber alleni
Haemolaelaps glasgowi
Mus triton
Laelaps zumpti Neotoma sp.
Haemolaelaps glasgowi
Mus trivirgatus Haemogamasus ambulans
Haeniogamasus liberiensis
Neotoma albigula
Mycrpmys minutus 1 Hirstionyssus breviseta
Haemolaelaps glasgowi H. neotomae
Laelaps micromydis Ischyropoda armatus
Hirstionyssus carnifex Brevisterna utahensis
H_. isabellinus B_. morlani
H. rnusculi
Haemogamasus nidi Neotoma cinerea
Haemolaelaps glasgowi
Myodes torquatus Haemogamasus ambulans
Laelaps semitectus
.Neotoma floridana
Myopus schisticolor Haemolaelaps glasgowi
Haemogamasus nidi
Neotoma fuscipes
Myospalax dybowskii Hirstionyssus neotomae
Haemolaelaps glasgowi Haemogamasus ambulans
Hirstionyssus confucianus Brevisterna utahensis
238
.
Haemolaelaps glasgowi Oryzomys palustris
.
Hirstionyssus neotomae Haemolaelaps glasgowi
Brevisterna morlani
H_.megaventralis
Gigantolaelaps cricetidarum
Laelaps oryzomydis
Neotoma pennsylvariicus
Haemolaelaps glasgowi
Otomys sp.
Hirsti onyssus otomys
Neotomodon sp.
Eubrachylaelaps circularis Otomys irroratus
Haemolaelaps labuschagnei
Neotomodon alstoni Laelaps parvulus
Eubrachylaelaps martini L. transvaalensis
Nesokia bengalensis Otomys tropicalis
Laelaps nuttalli Haemolaelaps labuschagnei
Echinolaelaps echidmnus H. sudanicus
’
Perognathus parvus Peromyscus maniculatus
Hirstionyssus hilli Haemolaelaps glasgowi
Eubrachylaelaps circularis
Perognathus penicillatus E_. debilis
Ischyrop’oda spiniger E_. hollisteri
Hirstionyssus carnifex
Perognathus spinatus H. hilli
IschyroRoda spiniger Brevisterna morlani
B. utahensis
Perognathus xanthonotus Haemogamasus alas.kensis
Ischyropoda armatus : Ischyropoda armatus
.
Echinolaelaps muricola H. reticulatus
Gigantolaelaps goyanensis
Praeomys tullbergi Laelaps aethiopicus
E chinolaelaps giganteus L. aragonfensis
L. exceptionalis
Proechimys sp. ’’’’.’v L. lamborni
Neoichoronyss^s dentipes L. wetmorei
:
E chinolaelaps grandis
Proechimys caljdius E. muricola
Tur uniscutatus
’
Ornithonyssus bacoti
.
.
Ophionyssus natricis
Prometheomys schaposchnikovi Hirstionyssus arcuatus
Haemolaelaps razumovae
Hirstionyssus bregetovae
,H. prometheonaicus "Ratode taquaral"
Haemogamasus zachvatkini Laelaps navasi
,
.
Haemolaelaps megaventralis Haemolaelaps sudanicus
Hirstionyssus sciurinus
Haemogamasus oudemansi Tachyoryctes ruddi
Haemolaelaps tachyoryctes
"Sewer rat" ’:
Ornithonyssus bacoti Tamias striatus
Haemolaelaps glasgowi
"Short-tailed mouse"
Haemogamasus ambulans Tamiasciurus douglasi
Haemolaelaps glasgowi
Sicista caudata Hirstionys sus affinig
Haemogamasus serdjukovae Haemogamasus ambulans
Pneumonyssus bakeri
Sigmodon hispidus
Haemolaelaps glasgowl Tamiasciurus fremonti
H. megaventralis Haemogamasus oudemansi
Gigantolaelaps cricetidarum
Steptolaelaps heteromys Tamiasciurus hudsonicus "
"Squirrels" . .
Thomomys sp.
Hirstionyssus pauli Haemogamasus ambulans
244
-
Haemogamasus ambulans Laelaps differens
H. occidentalis L. mazzai
i:
,
i^ pauliatanensis
Thomomys monticola :;,i Ornithonyssus bacptj
.
Haemogamasus ambulans 0^. lutzi
0. vitzthumi
’
Thomomys talpoides Eulaelaps vitzthumi
Haemogamasus ambulans.
"Wild rodents"
"Tropical rat" Gigantolaelaps gilmorei
Ornithonyssus bacoti
"Wood mouse"
Tscherskia triton Laelaps hilaris
Eulaelaps stabularis
Haemogamasus kusumotoi "Wood rat"
Laelaps nuttalli
Uromys lorentzi .. .
Ornithonysaus bacoti
Mysolaelaps rothschildi
"Yellow-throated mouse"
Uromys stalkeri .,;, Laelaps hilaris
Mysolaelaps rotlischildi
Zapus hudsonicus
Vandeleuria nilagirjca Haemolaelaps glasgowi
Laelaps. bhutanensis
Zygo.dontomys las’turus
"Water rat" Eubrachylaelaps rotundus
Laelaps agilis Ornithonyssus monteiroi
L. novikovae
Carnivora
’
Ornithonyssus bacoti . Haemogamasus amfaulans
Eulaelaps stabularis
Procyon lotor ..
Haemolaelaps glasgowi
Galictis vittata (= prison vittatus)
Echinolaelaps berlesei Putorms sp. ;. ’
.
.
Ornithonys sus braziliensis Hirstionyssus isabellinus
Putorius erminea
Martes zibellina Hirstionyssus a’rcuatus
Haemogamasus nidi
H_. ambulans . Putorius putorius
Haemolaelaps fahrenhoizi
Mephitis elongata Hirstionyssus arcuatus
Haemolaelaps glasgowi
Hirstionyssus staffordi
"Raccoon"
Mephitis mesomelas Haemogamasus ambulans
’
Hirstionyssus staffordi Ornithonyssus bacoti
:
Mephitis nigra Spilogale interrupta
’
Haemolaelaps glasgowi Hirstionyssus staffordi
Spilogale leucoparia
Mustela sp. Hirstionyssus staffordi
Haemolaelaps glasgowi
Spilogale putorius
Mustela erminea Hirstionyssus Stafford!
Hirstionyssus isabellinus
Eulaelaps stabularis "Spotted skunk"
Ornithonyssus bacoti
Mustela nivalis Eulaelaps stabularis
Laelaps hilaris
L. pachypus
Hirstionyssus isabellinus Urocyon cinereoargenteus
Haemogamasus ambulans Haemolaelaps glasgowi
H. nidi .
"Weasel"
Mustela saturata Laelaps hilaris
Haemogamasus pccidentalis Haemogamasus hirsutus
246
Pinnipedia
Otaria byronia
Eumetopias j’ubata
’
Orthohalarachne att’ehuata
Orthohalarachne magellanica
0. zaiophi
Phoca richardii
’
Halarachne miroungae
Halichoerus grypus
Halarachne halichoeri
"Tasmanian sea bear"
Orthohalarachne reflexa
Mirounga angustirostris
Halarachne miroungae
Zaiophus californianus
Orthohalarachne zaiophi
Monachus tropicalis 0. diminuata
Halarachne americana
’.’’ Hyracoidea
’
;
Dendrohyrax arborens ’’ Procavia capensis
:
Pneumonysgua schoutedeni Pneumonyssus procavians
.’ Perissodactyla
Equus caballos
Ornithonyssus bursa
Dermanyssus gallinae
Artiodactyla
Kobus defassa
Raillietia hopkinsi
AVES
Tinamiformes
Rhynchotus rufescens
Neonyssus serraoi
Colymbiformes
Procellariiformes
Ciconiiformes
Anseriformes
.
Dermanyssus gallinae
Anas platyrhynchos
Rhinonyssus-rhinolethrum :;;;;’ Mareca americana .: . .
Rhinonyssus rhmolethrfUm
Anas sparsa
Rhinonyssus rhinolethrum Mergus merganser. ,,.. ...,;.
Rhinonyssus rhiriolethrum
Anas strepera
Rhinonyssus rhinolethrum Plectropterus gambensis
;.,. Rhinonyssus rhinolethrum
Aythya affinis
Rhinonyssus rhinolethrum
Sarkidiornis melanotos , : :
Rhinonyssus rhino].e1;hru’nii’
Branta canadensis
Rhinonyssus rhinolethrum Spatula clypeata
. Rhinonyssus rhinolethrum
Falconiformes
;’?i)r:c.i;;,’.-.;:’?
Lophaetus occipitalis
Neonyssus buteonis .. Rupornis magnirostris
Rhinonyssoides souzai
Galliformes
"Bobwhite" . ; . "Chickens"
Haemogamasus aimbulans Ornithonys sus bursa
"Chickens", (contd.)
Orhithonyssus sylviarum "Turkeys"
Dermanyssus gallinae Ornithonys sus bursa
Haemogamasus ambulans Dermanyssus gallinae
"Poultry"
Ornithonyssus bacoti
Dermanyssus gallinae
.
Gruiformes
Charadriiformes
Rhinonyssus afribyx
Erolia maritima
Rhinonyssus neglectus Sterna hirundo
Larinyssus orbicularis
Gelochelidon nilotica
Larinyssus orbicularis Sterna maxima
Larinyssus orbicularis
Hemiparra crassirostris
Rhinonyssus himantopus
Totanus flavipes
Himantopus mexicanus Rhinonyssus coniventris
Rhinonyssus himantopus
Totanus nebularis
Larus argeniatus Sternostoma boydi
Larinyssus orbicularis
Tringa ocrophus
Larus atricilla Sternostoma boydi
Larinyssus orbicularis
Sternostoma boydi Tringa striata
Rhinonyssus coniventris
Larus delawarensis
Larinyssus orbicularis Totanus nebularius
"
Sternostoma boydi Sternostoma boydi
ColumbUormes
Cuculiformes’
Coliiformes
Colius striatus
Sternostoma striatus
Strigiformes
Asio capensis
Otus asio
Rhinoecius africanus
Dermanyssus oti
Asio otus
Steotyto cunicularia
Rhinoecius oti
Haemolaelaps glasgowi
Rhinoecius bisetosus
Bubo yirginianus
Trix varia
Rhinoecius grandis
Rhinoecius cooremani
"Eagle owl"
Dermanyssus Tyto alba
gallinae
Rhinoecius tytonis
Caprimulgiformes
Caprimulgus europaeus
Vitznyssus nitzschi
Cosmetornis vexillaris
Vitznyssus nitzschi
V. scotornis
Scotornis fossil
Caprimulgus tnstigma
Vitznyssus nitzschi
, Vitznyssus~icotornis
V_. scotornis
252
_
;
i.Mieropodiformes
’
’.
.
.
Rhinonyssoides strandtmanni
’;.;-;Coraciitormes .
Piciformes
Passeriformes
Acanthis cannabifla .
’
Bessonornis archeri
SteatonyssuS, musculi PtilonyssoCTes dioptrornis
Dioptrornis fis’cHeri
Ptilonyssus dioptrornis
Cerchneis tinnunculus
Rhtnonyssoldes cerchneis- Donacobius atricapillus
Qrnithonyssus iheringi
Cercomela familiaris
Ptilonyssus rnotacillae Dryoscopus cubia
Paraneonyssus^dryscopj.
Chalcomitra senegalensis
Pttlonyssus cinnyris
Sternoatoma nectarinia Elaenia obscura-’..’
Rochanyssus werneri
Chlorocichia flavicQllis
Ptilonyssus chlorocichlae Elaenia flavogaster
Travanyssus paranensis
Cinclus ci.ncl.us
Sternostoma technaui Emberiza cirlus
Ptilonyssus nudus
Estrilda paludicola’.-.
Cisticola erythrpps .’ Paraneonyssus aatridae
Ptilonyssus calamocichlae
Euphagus sp.
"Common sparrow" Haemolaelaps megaventralis
Ornithonyssus .bu-rsa ....
Euphagus cyanocephalus
Cossypha heugl.ini .. . Paraneonyssus icteridius
.
Ptilonyssus lanii
Euplectes orix
Craspedophora magnifica Paraneonyssus ploceanus
Rhmonyssoides .nova-guineae
Macronyx croceus
Icterus bullocki Sternostoma tracheacolum
Sternostoma tracheacolum Paraneonyssus capensis.
.
"Martin" Oberholseria chlorura
Dermanyssus hirundinis :;. Eubrachylaelaps deb,ffl,is
"Meadow lark" Oenanthe oenanthe .
Onychognathus moria
Melosplza melodia Pellonyssus reedi
Haemolaelaps glasgowi
Oriolus larvatus ;. :
Molothrus ater Ptilonyssus orioli
Sternostoma strandtmanrii
Paraneonyssus icteridius Oriolus oriolus
Ptilonyssus orioli
Motacilla aguimp
Ptilonyssus motacillae Otocoris alpestris
Paraneonyssus capitatus
Motacilla capensis
Ptilonyssus motacillae Parus atricapillus :.;’:’
Ptilonyssus nudus
Motacilla flava. .;
^-
Ptilonyssus motaciilae Parus major .
.
.
Ptilonyssus nudus
Muscicapa aquatica
.
Ptilonyssus lanti. Passer domesticus . .
Haemolaelaps megaventralis
Muscicapa striata. ; Ornithonyssus’banksi
Ptilonyssus nudu s 0. bursa
P. lanii
~
’ 1
Pellonyssus passeiri
P. viator
Sternostoma cryptorhynchum
"Native song birds" Paraneonyssus hirsti-
Dermanyssus gallinae Ptilonyssus nudus
REPTILIA
Chelonia
Ophionyssus natricis’
Squamata
Sauria
Agama adramitana
Ophionyssus natricis "Lizard"
Ophionyssus natricis
Lacerta agllis
Sauronyssus saurarum
Mabuya quinquestriata ;
Lacerta muralis Sauronyssus gordonensis
Sauryonyssus saurarum
Serpentes
.
.
Ophionyssus. natricis . Pneumophionyssus aristoterisi
.
.
"Snakes": .
Host .Specificity
.
It may also be noted that sometimes whole genera of mites are re-
stricted to certain types of hosts. For example, the genus Laelaps para-
sitizes only rodents; the genus Rhinoecius is fouad only in owls; ,Ptilo-
nyssus only in passeriform birds; Spinturnix, Steatonyssus,,. Ichoro
nyssus and Periglischrus only on bats, etc. ’,’". ""
’
’
True host specificity cannot be determined tor a species uriles.s it
has been accurately recorded from a number of localities. Because so
many species have been found only once, it is a bit hazardous to guess
how many are actually specific, but judging from better known species,
only a relatively few qualify. Laelaps multispinosus on the muskrat
Ondatra zibethicus appears to be an example of a truly specific host-
parasite relationship. This mite does not occur on any other species.
Recently, Cross (1954) has shown that some mites (including Ornith-
onyssus bacoti, 0. bursa, 0_. sylviarum, Dermanyssus gallinae, Echino-
laelaps echidninus and Haemolaelaps glasgowi) will feed through silk
bolting cloth on blood from an abnormal host. Apparently then. in such
instances, host specificity is more a matter of physiological, compatabil-
ity than a question of choice of diet. It has been previously noted that
conditions, rather than hosts, may determine specificity in certain forms
(see page 199).
Much more needs to be known about many more species before any-
thing very definite can be said about host specificity. La our present
state of knowledge, it appears as if the majority of species restrict them-
selves to certain host groups rather than to any one host species. How-
ever, Zachvatkin(1948) and Lange(l955) believe that the parasitic Meso-
stigmata, at least of the genus Laelaps, are very closely circumscribed,
both geographically and faunally. They have erected several new sub-
species on the basis of minute morphological differences, which they
claim are significantly associated with either geographical location or
host association or both.
APPENDIX
Collecting Methods
There are really only two sources of parasitic mites: (1) the host,
and (2) the habitat of the host. Probably the best way to collect from
the nest is to place it in a paper sack or other mite-tight container, car-
ry it to the laboratory and place it in a Berlese funnel. Needless to say,
the maker of the nest must be positively identified. A glass jar should
be screwed into a lid that is soldered to the bottom of the funnel so the
mites can be collected alive. The jar can be periodically emptied into
awhite enamelpanand the mites aspirated into vials as they crawl away
from whatever debris may have fallen through with them. Not all mites
will crawl into the open, but the hidden ones can be quickly found by put-
ting the debris in a small dish and examining under a binocular micro-
scope. Collecting the mites alive is vastly superior to collecting them
in alcohol or water. For best results, nests should be placed in Ber-
lese funnels within twenty-four kaurs after collection.
To collect from the host ( and this is the only way to find internal
mites and the mites of free ranging reptiles ) it is first necessary to
catch the animal. It is probably preferable to live trap the host although
there is no real evidence that dead trapped animals lose many mites
within the first few hours after death. Whether taken dead or alive, the
animal should be carried to the laboratory in a tightly tied bag.
Iji the laboratory, the animal, if it is a bird or mammal, should be
anesthetized and then combed, brushed and vigorously shaken over an
enamel tray. We think this method gives better results than washing in
a detergent, at least as far as mesostigmatid mites are concerned. Spe-
cific areas of the animals may also be investigated under magnification,
such as in the ears of mammals and under the wings and around the eyes
of birds, but it is usually unrewarding to examine furred or feathered
animals in detail over the entire body. Mites on reptiles, however, are
best found by examining the body under a dissecting microscope. We
have never had much success in collecting mesostigmatid mites by plac-
ing the host in a Berlese funnel although this is sometimes the method
of .choice for chiggers.
Internal mites are found only by opening the animal and examining
the organs. As far as is now known, they inhabit only the body cavities,
primarily the respiratory system and the auditory apparatus.
263
264
Mounting Methods
20 cc water 35 cc water
15 g gum arable 20 g .gum arable
Up to 160 g chloral hydrate 30 g chloral hydrate
10 cc glucose syrup 12 cc glycerin
5 cc acetic acid 3 cc glucose syrup
,
Gater’s Modification:
The glucose syrup is prepared with equal parts of glucose and water.
Honey may be substituted for the glucose syrup.
266
.
5 ’ml glycerin 20 cc glycerin
70’" g chloral hydrate 3 cc glucose syrup
3 ’ml glacial acetic acid 10 drops or more basic fucnsin.
50 g distilled water
30 g gum arable
200 g chloral hydrate
20 g glycerin
5. Use like any mountant. Material may be mounted directly from life,
any aqueous solution, or alcohol,
Methocellulose Formula
formula is:
5 g metboceUulose
2 g carbowax 4, 000
1 ml diethylene glycol
,25 ml 95% ethyl alcohol
100 ml lactic acid
25 ml distilled water
40 g chloral hydrate
25 cc water . ,
. Culture Methods
Another method is to remove the host a day or two before the mites
are needed. Hungry mites will crawl to the top of the cages and cluster
where they can be easily aspirated. [Chamberlain and Sikes (1950) des-
cribe .an excellent aspirator.]
A third method is to run some of the nesting material through a Ber-
lese funnel to the bottom of which has been screwed a glass jar.
Individual, or life; history cultures. The methods above described
are obviously unsuited for the close observations necessary for life his-
tory studies. For such studies the mite must be restricted for contin-
uous observation and at the same time must have a source of food cons-
tantly available. Several very ingenious methods have been devised for
this purpose.
Camin(1953) placed individual mites (Ophionyssus natricis) insmall
plastic cups and sewed these onto the skin of the snake. Kubber cream
glue was usedto seal any openings between the bottom of the cup and the
snake.
Bertram <rt al. (1946) kept Ornithonyssus bacoti under continuous
observation by confining them in glass vials and periodically inserting
the tail of a rat into the vial. The rat was immobilized during the feed-
ing period and a piece of modeling clay or plasticene was molded around
the base of the tail to keep the mites from escaping. (See also Skaliy
and Hayes. 1949.)
Sikes and Chamber lain (1954) used mass feeding techniques to work
out the life history of bird mites. Fully engorged females were isolated
in glass tubes plugged with black cotton. All the eggs collected within
24 hours were isolated, allowed to hatch and change to protonymphs.
These protonymphs were placed on chicks which were caged over a tray
of water and after a specified time engorged protonymphs were collected
and placed in vials. These were allowed to molt to deutonymphs (and to
adults in the case of Ornithonyssus) and the process repeated- Many
mites are lost by such techniques but the net results are quite satisfac-
tory.
Cross and Wharton (1954) found that mites could be successfully
cultured in small glass tubes by feeding them on heparinized blood through
#173 mesh silk bolting cloth. Owen (1956) has successfully studied the
life cycle of E chinolaelaps echidninus by this method.
There are several methods of collecting eggs or protonymphs of
known age. Bertram et aL (1946) placed several engorged females in
a section of glass tubing, one end of which was covered with #8 silk cloth,
and another tube placed end to end with it. As soon as protonymphs were
present and active, a heated metal ring was slowly passed over the first
tube and the protonymphs driven through the cloth into the second vial.
The females, which could not pass through the cloth, were killed by this
method.
Skaliy and Hayes (1949) placed a strip of roughened filter paper in
a vial with engorged females. The mites preferred to lay their eggs on
this strip and after any specified length of time the filter paper and at-
tached eggs could be withdrawn. Adhering females could be brushed off
270
__________
206-209. , .
.. . .. .
.
ALLRED, D. M, and ROSCOE,. E. J. .1957 Parasitic mites in desert
271
272
.
.
ARNOLD, H. L.. JR. and ARNOLD, H. L., SR. 1943 The diagnosis
and management of bird-mite bites. Proc. "Staff Meetings Clinic,
;;’
’
Honolulu 9: 41-44.
ASANUMA, K.. 1948a A note on the nomenclature of Liponyssus nagayoi,
a house-infesting mite in Japan (preliminary note). Misc. Repts.
Res. Inst. Nat.’Resources No. 11: 5pp.
_______’ l948b Notes on parasitic Acari collected from the Man-
churian tarabagan (Marmota bobac sibirica). Seibutu .3: 171-176.
__________ 1948c Ontwo unrecorded mites parasitic on rodents in
Japan. Misc. Repts. Res. Inst. Nat. Resources No. 1.2: 29-32.
_________ 1949a An observation of the macroscopic fauna in the
nests of some mice and voles, a quantitative study of the samples ob-
tained in western Manchuria. -Ibidem No. 13: 31-37.
________ 1949b On the occurrence of a parasitic mite, Eulaelaps
stabularis in northeastern Asia. Ibidem No. 13; 37-38.
________ 1950 A study on some structures of each stage of para-
sitic mites of the genus Laelaps in northeastern Asia. Ibidem No. 16:
’
’
24-32, .. :
1951a Redescription of Haemogamasus kitanoi Asanuma
1948, together with remarks on Acari parasitic on a Mongolian pika,
Ochotona daurica (Pallas), from Northwest Manchuria. Ibidem. No.
22: 4-8.
1951b Critical notes on the genera Euhaemogamasus
Ewing and Haemogamasus Berlese, with description of a new species
from Manchuria. Ibidem No. 24: 15-21.
________ 1951c Myonyssus shibatai: a new parasitic mite of the
family Liponyssidae. Ibidem Nos. 19-21: 79-86.
________ 1952a Anewparasiticmite of the genus Haemogamasus
from Japanese rodents. Japan Jour. Exper. Med. 22; 43-47.
________ 1952b Two new species of the blood-sucking mites para-
sitic on the striped mouse, Apodemus agrarius from Manchuria. Misc.
Repts. Res. Inst. Nat. Resources No. 25: 86-92.
________ 1953 Descriptive notes on two new species of parasitic
273
.
1915 The Acarina or mites. A review of the group for the
use of economic entomologists. U. S. Dept.-Agric. Rept,. 108: 1-153.
1917 New mites, mostly economic.; Entom. News 28: 193-
199.
BARABASH-NIKIFOROV, I. I. 1950 Fauna of muskrat-burrow as a
factor affecting its life. Dokl. Acad. Sci.-U. S.S.R. n. ser. 71: 933-
936. ,
.
BARBER. L. B. 1916 Report of the animal husbandman and veterin-
arian. Guam Agric. Exper. Sta. Rept., 1915. pp. 23-41.
.
BARNESBY, G. J. 1871 Parasites on canaries. Newman’s Entom. 5:
281. . .
________
429-435.
1917 Sul Liponyssus natricis (Gerv.) e su altri Derman-
issidi del Bettili.
Ibidem 13: 55-71.
1918 Centuria quarta di Acari nuovi (con 1 tigura nel
teste). Ibidem 13: 115-192.
1921 Centuria quinta di Acari nuovi. Ibidem 14: 143-
195.
__________ 1923. Centuria sesta di Acari nuovi. Ibidem 15: 237-262.
BERLESE, A. and TROUESSART, E. L. 1889 Diagnose d’acarien
275
’
’
Zhur. 3’5.
BREGETOVA, N’. G. and KOLPAKOVA, S. A. ’1952 Gamasid mites
(Parasitiformes, Gamasoidea) the parasites of the water field mouse
(Arvicola terrestris L.) and inhabitants of its nests in ’the ’delta re-
gion of the River Volga. Parazitol. Sb. Zool. Inst. Acad. Sci. U.S.
S.R. 14: 56-70.
___________________ 1956 Garoasid mites (Parasitiformes, Ga-
masoidea) - parasites of small mouselike rodents and their nests in
the Volga Delta. Ibidem 16: 184-197.
BREGETOVA, N. G. and NELZINA.’E. N. 19’52 -The marmot mite
Haemogamasus citelli Breg. andNelz. sp. nov. (Gamasoidea, Haemo-
gamasidae). Parazitol. Sb. Zool. Inst. Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R. 14: 71-
74.
BREGETOVA. N. G. and VYSOTSKAYA, S. 0. 1949 Gamasid Acarina
(Gamasina, Parasititormes) parasites of Microtus arvalis Pall. in-
habitants of its nests in the envirnoment of Leningrad. Mag. Para-
zitol. Moskva 11: 186-200.
BRODY, A. L. 1936 The transmission of fowl pox. Mem. Cornell
Agric. Exper. Sta. 195 (37).
BROWN, A. W. A. 1951 Insect Control by Chemicals. Chapt. 11, In-
secticides and the balance of animal populations, pp. 720-780. John
Wiley and Sons, New York.
BROWN, J. H. 1953 A chicken mite infestation in a hospital. Jour.
Econ. Entom. 46: 900.
BROWNING, E. 1950 On the occurrence of the tropical rat raite, Bdel-
lonyssua bacoti (Hirst) 1913 Syn. Liponyssus bacoti (Hirst) in
Great Britain. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 44: 2.
BRUMPT, E. *1936 Bdellonyssus bacoti Hirst. Precis de Parasitol.
Paris 2: 1250. .
.
BUITENDIJK, A. M. *1945 Voorloopige catalogus van de Acari in de
collectie - Oudemans. Overdrukt Zool, Med. 24: 295-309.
BUNYEAR, H. and SVEHR, E. BJ 1941 Diseases and parasites of poul-
try. U. S. Dept. Agric. Bull. 1652: 1-82.
BURGESS, G. D. 1955 Arthropod ectoparasites of Richardson’s ground
squirrel. Jour. Parasitol. 41: 639.
277.
BUSHNELL, L. D, andBRANDLY, C. A. 1929 Poultry diseases and
their prevention and control. Bull. ’Kansas A’gric. Exper. Sta.247.
CAMERON. D. 1938 The northern fowl mite Liponyssus sylviarum
(C. and F. 1877). Canadian Jour. Res. 16: 230-254.
.
.
CAMIN, J. H. and ROGOFF. W. M. 1952 Mites affecting domesticated
mammals. S. Dakota State College Agric. Exper. Sta. Tech. Bull."
No. 10: 1-11.
CANESTRINI. G. 1884 Prospetto dell’ acarofaunaltaliana. Atti Inst .
Veneto Sci. Lett. Arti. Nov. 1883 Oct. 1884 2: 1563-1607 and 1631-
____________
.
1662.
1888 Idem. Ibidem 6: 142-143.
CANESTRINI, G. and CANESTRINI, R. *1882 I gamasi italiani. Atti
Soc. Ven.-Trent. Sci. Nat. Padova 8: 3-82.
CANESTRINI, G. and FANZAGO, F. *1878 Intorno agli Acari italiani.
Atti Roy. Inst. Veneto Sci., Lett. ed Arti. 5 s., v. 4: 69-208.
CARTER. H. F., WEDD, G. andD’ABERA. V. ST. E. ^ 1944’ Occur-
rence of mites in human sputum and their possible significance. In-
dian Med-.Gaz. 79: 163-168.
CASTRO, M. P. de 1948 Reestruturacao generica da familia: "Rhino-
nyssidaeVitzthum 1935" (Acari Mesostigmata: Gamasides) e descri-
cao de algunas especies novas. Arq. Inst. Biol.. Sao Paulo, 18: 253-
284. .. ..
CASTRO, M. P. de and PEREIRA, C. 1947 Acaros nasicolas (Para-
sitiformes: ^Rhinonyssidae) do Pardal -. "Passer Domesticus L."
’
’
.. encephalitis. Ibidem 6:..10’.47-105.3.: : : .’
.
26:. 59-70. ; .
.n; sp.,.a mite from- the ’frontal- smus of the-dog.-’- Jour. Parasitol.
... ;. .
.
.
.
.
CLARK. iE. W. and MORISH.ITA, P..’: 1950 C-M medium: A .mounting
medium for small insects, mites, and other’whole mounts. ’Science
112: 789. -’
CLARK, G. M, .-1958 Hepatozoon griseisciuri n. sp’;; a new species .of
Hepatozoon from .the grey squirrel (Sciurus ’carolinensis Gmelin,
... 1788), with.studies on the life cycle. ; Jour. Parasitol. 44: 52-63.
CLARK, G. M. and YUNKER, C. E. 1-956 A new-genus, and.-species of
Dermanyssidae (Acarina:. Mesostigmata) from the -English sparrow,
, with^abservations. on Us life.cycle. Proc; Helminthol. Soc. \Vashing-
.tous’23:.93-101.. : ;: i.. .. ;. ::’ ! . .
.
.
.
.
______________ 1947c Astudy of rodent-ectoparasites :in Savan-
.;.’ ’’
nah, Georgia. Ibidem: 42-60.
[_____________. l’947d A study of rodent-ectoparasites in Doth-
am, Alabama. Ibidem: 61-71.
COLLINS, B. J. 1931 Confused nomenclature- of’Nycteribia Latreil.le,.
179.6 and Spmturmx Heyden 1826. Nat. Inst. Health Bull. 155: 743-
.
765. .’ .
.
.
COOREMAN, J. 1943 Note sur la faune des Hautes-.Fa.nges en Bel-
gique. XI. Acariens Parasitiformes. Bull. Mus. P.oy.-Hist. Nat.
Belgique 19: 1-28. ; :
_____________
,
.
____________ *1943 Un acarien parasite de serpents, Qphionys -
sus natricis (Gervais). Bull. Mens. Nat. Beiges No.-7,’Juillet.
1944 Notes et observations sur les acariens. III.
Bull. Mus. Roy. Hist. Ufaf. Belgique 20: 1-6;’: ’. ’.
’
.___. .: 1946a Observations sur Pneumonyssus duttoniNew-
stead et Todd, acarien parasite de la trachee de Cercopithecus as-
canius Audebert, au Congo Beige.. Rev. Zool. Bot. Afr..39: 331-335.
1946b Rhinoecius oti n, gen.,’.ii. sp. (Acarien,
Rhinonyssinae). Bull. Mus. Roy. Hist. Nat. Belgique 22: 1-4.
CORY, E. N. 1923 Liponyssus bacoti Hirst. Jour. Econ. Entom. 16:
. 226.
CROSS, H. F. 1954 Feedingtests with blood sucking mites on heparin-
ized blood. Jour. Econ. Entom. 47: 1154-1155.
.
__________ 1955 A study of factors that may contribute to the host
specificity and feeding rate of blood sucking mites. Doctoral Disser-
279
.
DA VIS, L. J. .1945, Pulmonary acariasis in monkeys. -British Med.
Jour. 4366: 482.
’
. .
DEGEER, ’C.’ 1778 Des mittes qui vivant sur les oiseaux. Mem. Hist.
Insects. 7: 106-109. ’ ,
.
.
.
DERRICK, ’E. H., SMITH. D. J. W., BROWN, ..H. E... ’and FREEMAN.
M. 1939 The role of the bandicoot in the. epidemiology of "Q" fever:
a preliminary survey. Med. Jour. Australia, I,. 26th Year, -No. 4:
.. ., ’
’
150-155. ,,. ;.
^" ’
.
.
’ ":
tations in the delta region of the River Volga. Parazitol.’ Sb, Zool.
Inst. Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R. 15: 250-338.
DUBININ, V. B. and BREGETOVA, N. G. : 1952 Parasitic blood-sucking’
mites of vertebrates in Turkmenia. Zool. Inst. Akad. Sci, U.S.S.R.
10: 45-60.
.
DUBININ, V. B. and DUBININA, M. N. 1951 Parasitofauna of mam-’
mals of the Daur Steppe. Mater, k Poznaa. Fauny i Flory U.S.S.R.,
Izd. Moskva Obsch. Isp., Prir.. otdel. zoologii 22, Mater. p6 Gry-
zunam 4: 98-156. i .
.
.
DUBININA, M. N. 1947 Parasitofauna of the wild gray goose (Anser
anser L.). Parazitol. Sb. Zool. Inst. Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R. 10:. 165-
187.
DUGES, A. 1834 Nouvelles obs. sur. les acariens. Ann. Sci’. Nat.
Zool. 3rd Mem. 18-62.
DUNCAN. F. M. 1920 On Acari from the lungs of Macacus rhesus.
Jour. Roy. Micr. Soc. June. 163-168.
EADS, R. B. 1956 Ectoparasites from swallow nests, with the de-
scription of a new ceratophyllid flea. Jour. Parasitol. 42: 73-76.
EADS. K. B. and HIGHTOWER, B. G. 1951a A new Neoichoronyssus
from the pack rat, Neotoma mi"ropus (Acarina: Laelaptidae). Proc,
Entom. Soc. Washington 53: 295-298.
_______________ 1951b A new mite from nests of the-wood rat,
Neotoma micropus. Entom. News 62: 249-252. ’:.:
1952 A new mite of the .genus Neoi.chbr onyssus.
Proc. Entom. Soc,. Washington 54: 32-35.
EADS, R. B., MENZIBS..G. C,, and MILES. V. I. 1952’. Acarina taken
during West Texas plague studies. Proc. Entom. Soc. Washington
54: 250-253. ... .
.
-i .’. ’,
.
ELLIS, L. L., JR. .1955: A study of the ectoparasites of certain mam-
mals in Oklahoma. Ecology 36: 12-18.:
.
EUSTIS,. E. B. and FULLER, H. S. .1952 -Rickettsialpox II: Recovery
of Rickettsfa: akari from mites Allodermanyssus sanguine us from
West Hartford, Conn. Soc. Exper. Biol. Med. Proc. 80: 546-549.
EVANS, G.,0..- 195.5a A collection of mesostigmatid mites, from Alaska.
Bull. British Mus. (Nat. Hist.).2: 17-307.
.
___ ,-,, l:955b’ A review of .the laelaptid paraphages of the Myri-
apoda with descriptions of three new species (Acariria; Laelaptidae).
Parasitology45:-35-2-368. . ., . .’
-
.
.
.
__________ 1957 An introduction to British. Mesostigmata (Acarina)
with keys to.farnilies’and genera. ^cur^Lim-i. Soc.-Zool. 43: 203-259.
281
_________
Soc. Washington 34: 13-16.
1933 New genera and species of parasitic mites of the
super-family Parasitoidea. Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus. 82: 1-14.
________ 1936 A short synopsis of the North American species
of the mite genus Dermanyssus. Proc. Entom. Soc. Washington 38:
47-54.
________ 1942 A second introduced rat mite becomes annoying
to man. Proc. Helminthol. Soc. Washington 9: 74-75.
________ 1947 Notes on some parasitic mites of the super-family
Parasitoidea, with a key to the American genera of the Liponyssinae.
Proc. Biol. So.c. Washington 60: 83-90.
________ 1950 A note on an early record and a synonym of the
tropical rat mite, Liponyssus (Bdellonyssus) bacoti Hirst. Ibidem
17: 24-25. .. .
.".
’
’
.
. .
,
_______
.
1955b Deux nouveaux acariens de la famille Halarachnidae
Oudemans, parasites des fosses nasales des singes au Congo Beige
et au Ruanda-Urundi. Ibidem 51: 307-324.
_______ 1956 Les acariens de lafamille Rhinonyssidae Vitzthum 1935
parasites des fosses nasales des oiseaux au Ruanda-Ur’undi. Ibidem
53: 131-157. ...
.
_______1957a Essai de classification des Rhinonyssidae (Acari: Meso-
stigmata) avec description de deux genres nouveaux. Ann. Parasitol.
Hum. Comp. 31: 145-157. ;
_______ 1957b Deux nouveaux acariens parasites nasicoles du;porc-
epic au Congo Beige. Rev. Zool. Bot. Afr. 55: 69-81.
.
_______ 1957c. Les acariens du genre-Astridiella n. g. (Rhinonyssidae)
parasites nasicoles del’engoulevent et de 1’outarde. Riv. Parassitol.
18: 91-102. ,
569-591.
FARRIS, E. J. .(Editor) 1950 The care’and breeding of laboratory ani-
mals. Chapt. 3. The care of experimental mice, p. 95(byL. C.
Strong). J; Wiley and Sons, New York. ’
.
,
FONSECA, F. Da 1932a NotasdeAcareologia II - Ichoronyssus butan-
tanensis, sp. n. (Acarina: Dermanyssidae). iMeni. Inst. ’Butantan
7: 135-138.
____________ 1932b Idena III - Parasitismo do homem e da Cavia
aperea por Liponissus bacoti (Hirst, 1913) (Acarina, Dermanyssidae).
Ibidem 7: 139-143.
1932c Idem IV - Presenca do Ophionyssus serpen-
tium (Hirst, 1915) no serpentario do Institute Butantan. Ibidem 7:
145-146.
___________ 1934 Per Schlangenparasit Ixobioides butantanensis
novi generia, n. sp. (Acarina, Ixodorhynchidae nov. fam.) Zeitschr.
Parasitenk., Berlin 6: 508-527.
___________ l935a Notas de Acareologia X - Occorrencia, em
Sao Paulo, de acarianos transmissores de varias modalidades de febre
exanthematica e suas possiveis relacoes corn a rickettsiose neotropica
paulista. Mem. Inst. Butantan 9: 3-17.
___________ 1935b Idem XII - Eulaelaps vitzthumi, sp. n. (Aca-
rina-Laelaptidae). Ibidem 9: 33-38.
___________ 1935c Idem XIII New South American species of
-
the genus Liponissus Kolenati, 1858 (Acarina, Liponissidae). Ibidem
9; 73-88.
1935d Idem XIV - Ceratonyssus joaquimi sp, n.
(Acarina, Liponyssidae) parasita de Glossophaga soricina (Pallas) de
Sao Paulo. Ibidem 9: 89-97.
___________ 1935-1936a Idem XVIII - Novos generos e especies
de acarianos parasitas de .:ratos (Acari: Laelaptidae). Ibidem 10: 3-9.
284
’
’. ’ ’
.
__
1935-1936’e ’Idem XX -’ Especies novas deacarianos
__
.do genero Laelaps, parasitas de ratos do Brazil;’ Ibidem 10: 1.9-23.
^S-l^Wd Idem XXII - Liponissus haem’atophagus
sp. n. (Acari: Liponis’s’idae). -Ibidem 10: 25-28.
1935-1936e Idem XXIV - A) Representante brasil-
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
eiro do genero Dermahyssus’Duges, 1834. Ibidem 10: 51-57.
__________ l935-1936f Idem XXIV
- B) Nota sobre o home gen-
___________
erico Parataelaps. Ibidem 10: 58-59.
1938-1939a Idem XXV - The giant Laelaptidafe,.para-
s’ites of Soutn’American rodents. n. gen. arid sp. Ibidem 12: 57-102. .
.
’"’
’____"’ 1938-1939c Liponissus brasiliensis, sp. n. usual
parasite of rodents and accidental of man. Ibidem 12: 148-160.
’
’
’
1938-1939d Notas de Acareologia XXVIII - Occur-
rence of Dermanyssus gallinae (Degeer, 1778) in Brazil. (Acari:
Dermanyssi’dae). Ibidem 12: 1. ’ .
.
FUJISAKI, K. 1953 Studies on the parasites of rats. Nagasaki Igakkai
.
Zassi 28(9).. . ;;. .
.
.
___________
236-239. .. ... .
.
._____ 1953b Comparative evaluation of control procedures
.
against the northern fowl mite. Jour. Econ. Entom. 46: 822-826.
1954 A revision of the genus Pneumonyssua (Acari:
Halarachnidae). Jour. Parasitol. 40: 31-42,
1955a Revision of the genus Eubrachylaelaps ’(Aca-
rina: ,Laelaptid,ae) with descriptions of two new species from Mexico.
Ann. Entom. Soc. America 48: 51-59.
1955b Steptolaelaps, a new genus of mites parasitic
on neotropical rodents. Jour. Parasitol. 41: 519-525.
___________ 1957a Revision.of the genus Sternostoma Berlese and
286
-
PURMAN. D. P. and TIPTON, V.-J. 1955 The genus Myonyssus Tira-
boschi (Acarina: Dermanyssidae) including a new species from pika.
Jour, Parasitol. 41: 179-184. . .
.
GUNTHER, C. E. M. 1942 New parasitid mites fcrom New Guinea
(Acarina: Parasitidae). Proc. Linn. Soc. New S. Wales 68: 87-89.
GUSEV, V. M. 1955 T.othe question of natural foci of lymphocytic cho-
riomeningitis. Khark. Gos. Univ., Kharkov: 1-16,
GUTSEVITCH. A. V. 1947 J^. bacoti as vector of endemic typhus. Pri-
roda 36: 66.
HAHN, G. and GRIJONS, G. *1901 Eine neue endoparasitare Acaride.
Centralbl. Bakteriol. Parazitenk., Abt. 1, Bd. 30: 7-9.
HAARL0V, N. 1942 A morphologic-systematic-ecological investigation
of Acarina and other representatives of the microfauna of the soils
around Morkefjord, North East Greenland. Meddelelser om Gr^n-
land, Komm. Videnskabel. Undersogelser I. GriAnlahd 128: 1-71.
^___________
1943 The chaetotaxis of tarsus I in some Mesostigmata.
With special reference to a supposed homologon of tarsal organ of
genus Spinturnix and Haller’s organ of the ticks. Saertryk Entom.
Medd. 23: 273-294.
HAL3ERT, J. N. 1915 Acarinida II: terrestrial and marine Acarina.
Clare Island Survey. Proc. Roy. Irish Acad. 31: 47-136. .
’
1-9.
HEFLEY, H. M. 1935 A new-mite from the common skunk: Mephitis
nigra. Joar, Kansas Entoro. Soc. 8: 22-24.
HELWIG, F. C. 1925 Arachnid infection in monkeys. American Jour,
Path. 4: 389-395.
HERMANN *l804 Mem. Apt.; p. 83.
HERMS, W. B. 1939 Medical Entomology With Special Reference to the
Health and Wellbeing of Man and Animals. Macmillan Co. New York,
582 pp.
HERRICK. G. W. 1902 The chicken mite. Bull. .Mississippi Agric.
Exper. Sta. 78.
________________ 1915 Some external parasites of poultry with
special reference to Mallophaga, with directions for their control.
Cornell Univ. Agric. Exper. Sta. 359: 233-268.
HILL. E. L. and MORLAN, H. B. 1948 Evaluation of county-wide DDT
dusting operations in murine typhus control. Publ. Health Repts. 63:
1635-1653.
HILL, E. L., MORLAN, H. B.. UTTERBACK. B. C., and SCHUBERT,
J. H. 1951 Evaluationof county-wide DDT dusting operations in mu-
rinetyphuscontrol(1946 through’1’949). American Jour. Publ. Health
41: 396-401.
HILL. M. A. and GORDON, R. M. 1945 An outbreak, of dermatitis
amongst troops in North Wales caused by rodent mites, Ann. Trop.
Med. Parasitol. 39: 46-52. ’’ .’ .
.
.
________’ 1956a Ischyropoda furmani n. sp., a new ectopara-
sitic mite from Utah. Jour. Para’sitol. 42; 311-315.
___________ 1956b Ectoparasitic laelaptid and dermanyssid mites
of Egypt, Kenya and the Sudan, primarily based on Namru 3 collec-
tions, 1948-1953. Jour. Egyptian Publ. Health Ass. 31: 199-272.
KEEGAN. H. L. and HEDEEN, R. A. 1952 Collections of ectoparasitic
mites from Alaska. Jour. Parasitol. 38: 360-361.
KIRSCH, E. 1950 Pathologische Lungenv.eranderungen beim Rhesusaf-
fen, hervorgerufen durch Pneumonyssus simicola (Aca-rina). Zeit-
schr. Parasitenk. Berlin 14: 626-636;’’
KIRSCHENBLATT, IA. D. 1950 Life cycle of fllaria parasite of cot-
ton rat. Priroda 5: 63.
KISELEV.. R. I. and VOLTCHANETSKA. G. I. 1954 Importance of the
mite Allodertnanyssus sanguineus Hirst in the epidemiology ofrick-
ettsiasis. Tez. Dokl. Nautch. SessiiMin. Zdrav. U.S.S.R., A.M..N.
U.S.S.R. .i Inst. Epidemiol. i Mikrobiol. Medgiz,Moskva-Leningrad
49-50.
KNIGHT, I. W. M. 1951 A report on mites infesting the muskrat. Ca-
nadian Enfom. 83: 279-280. ’ . .
.
KOUTZ, F. R., CHAMBERLAIN, D, M., and COLE, C. R, 19.53 Pneu-
monyssus caninum in the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. Jour.
American Vet. Med. Ass. 122: 106-109.
KRAMER, P. and NEUMANN. C. 1883 Acariden wahrend der "Vega"-
Expedition eingesammelt. "Vega"-Exped. Vetensk, Jakttagelser,
Vol. 3. Stockholm.
KRIVONOSOV. K. I. 1949 To the fauna of tularaemia vectors in the
River Don valley. Refer. Nautch.-issled. rabot Rostov naD.onuPro-
tivotchunan. Inst. 8: 93-96.
KULAGIN, S. M. and ZEMSKA. A. A. 1953 Allodermanyssus sanguin-
eus as vector of vesicular rickettsiasis. Vopr. Kraev obsch. Eksp.
Parazitol. i Med. Zool. 8: 34-40.
LAIRD, M. 1950 Notes on the infestation of man by the chicken mite
Dermanyssus gallinae (deGeer), in New Zealand. New Zealand Med.
Jour. 49: 22-23. ,
’
LEBEDINSKY, J.- 1905 Zur’^Iiyhlen Fauna der Krym.-’ Za-plski Novo-’
’
’
’
LOMBARDINI, G. 1938 Chiave analiticani Sottordini alle superfamig-
lie et alle famiglie degli Acari.-’iRedia 24: 199-217.
___________ 1944 Spinturnix ’vespertilionis (L.) Duf. ianzai v. n.
Ibidem 30: 5. :
’’ ’ ..
19-oS Acari.nuoViXX-IX. Ibidem 38: 181-194.
___________ 1957 Idem XXXIII Mesostigmata. Ibidem 42: 283-289.
LOWELL, M, E. 1946- Rat-mite dermatitis: acariasis caused by-’the
tropical rat mite ’ Liipony’ssus bacoti Hirst. Arch. Derm. ’Syph. 54:
278-280. ’."’ : i-
MC CARDLE, A. A. 1950 Red mites (Dermanyssus gallinae-) hidden
enemy of poultry; Australia’s .Poultry World 22: 39.
MC CLELLAND, R. B.-"arid-MC’.CLELLAND, F. E., JR. 1952 Pneu-
monyssus caninum in a dog in western New York. Cornell Vet. 42:
337-338. ’
’ "
:
’
land Nat. 44: 467-477. ’
.
MIASNIKOV, IU. A, 1954 .Natural foci of tularaemia and the’character-
.
istics of their appearance. Tezisy Dokl. Nau’tch. Sessii Miri. Zdrav.
U.S.S.R. A.M.N. U.S.S.R. Inst. Epidemiol. i Mikrobiol. Med-
.
.
MURRAY, E. S., AYRES, J. C;,’ SNIDER, J.’C.; and POTASH...L.
1951 Studies of rickettsialpox.’ I. Recovery of Xb,e causative agent
from house mice in Boston, Mass. American Jour’. Hyg. 54: 8.2-100.
NAZAROV, G. S. 1936 .’Actioirof ’chlorine on ’the bird mite and its ova.,
Sov. Ptitsevodstvo ,1.2: 33-36’;’"^ . .
.
NEHRING. A. Halarachne!’halichoeri Allman, sowie uber-’einige
*1;88.4
Halichoerus -Schadel. Sitzungsb. Gesellsch. Naturf. Fr. Ber’Iin,
"
Jahrg. No. 4: 57-67. . ., :: ; \ .
’
.
.
NELZINA. E. N. and ROMAN OVA. V. P. .195:1.: V.he method oftrians-
mission of the tularemia microbe (B. tulare’nee ) by gamasid’-riiites.
Dokl. Akad. Sci. U.S.S.R. (n.s.) 78: 179-180;’ ’ ’. ’- .
- .
’ ’..’ ’
NEWTON. H. E. -1942 Tropical rat mite^ infestations. ’
California West.
’ ".
’
":-"’
’
’
_____
O’PARRELL, A. F. and BUTLER, P. M. 1948 Insects and mites, assoc-
iated with-storage and manufacture of food-stuffs in northern .Ireland.
Ec.Proc. Royal Dublin Soc. 3: 342-407. ’,;
OHMORI, N. 1935 On the life history of Liponyssus nagayoi Yamada.
Tokyo IjiShinshi-2960:’3250-3257. :.,. ’
;
.
1936 Studies on the tropical rat, mite. Second report: On
the sex ratio and parthenogenesis. Zopl. Mag., Japan 48: 627-628.
OLSEN, 0. and BRACKEN’. F. K. 1950 Occurrence of the ear.mite,
-
Raillietia auris (Leiay. ’1872). of cattle in’Colorado. Vet. Med. 45:
:-:-
.
.
320-321..’" ’"-
.
’ "’
OLSON, T. A. and DAHMS, R. G. 1946 Observations on
"’"
the tropical
’"
rat mite Liponyssus bacoti :as an ectoparasite of laboratory animals
and suggestions for its control. Jour. Parasitol. 32: 56-60,
.
OLSUFEV, N. G. 1940a The role of ectoparasites in the dissernina.tion
of tularemia in "the central region of R.S. F.S. R. Arkh, Biol. Sci.
’
’
60: 42-55.
.
.
^’^ 1940b Study of vectors of tularaemia in the U.S. S.R.
Tr. Vsesdiuz.Konfer. Mikrobiol. i Epidemioi, I’lntekts. i939, Med-
..
’
giz,. Moskva-Leningrad 247-252. "
.
____________
,
.
45 (31-4), 12 Mei. 123-150^
____________ 1904a Idem Seventh.Series,. Tijdscbr. Nederland.
’
Dierk. Vereen. 2. s., Deel 8(1), Feb. 17-34.
.
.
.
1904b Idem Eighth Series. Ibidem (2), Nov. 70-
~Q2~.
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
: ’....
.
1904c Acarologische aanteekeningen. XII .Entom.
Ber. Amsterdam (18) Deel 1, 1 July 160-164.
____________ 1906 Idem XXI. Ibidem (2 7) Deel 2, 1 Jan.. 37-43.
1910a A short survey of the more important fam-
ilies of Acari. Bull. Entom. Res. 1: 105-119,
^^__
1910b Acarologische aanteekeningen. XXXII. En-
_
_
_
_
tom. Ber. Amsterdam (53) Deel 3, 1 Mei. 67-74.
____________ 1912a Idem XLIII. Ibidem (67) Deel 3, l-.Sept.
272-278.
____________ 1912b Idem XLIV. Ibidem (68), 1 Nov. 291-292.
____________ 1913a Idem XLVIII. Ibidem (72) Peel 3, 1 Juli.
384-387.
.
.
____________ 1913b Idem XLIX. Ibidem (73) Deel 4:. 2-9.
1913-1914 Acarologische aus Maulwurfsnestern.
Archiv. Naturg.," Berlin 79 (Series A): (8) 108-200; (9) 68-136; (10)
1-69.
____
1914 Acarologische aanteekeningen. LII. Entoin,
"Ber. Amsterdam. (76) Deel 4, 1 Maart. 65-73.
__
l915a Pneumotuber macaci Landois and Hoepke.
"Tijdschr. Vergelijk Geneesk 1: 183-186.
_____________ 1915b Notizen u’ber Acari. 22. Reihe (Parasiti-
dae). Arch. Naturg., Berlin 81 (Series A) (I): 122-180.
l915c Acarologische aanteekeningen. LVI. En-
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
tom. Ber. Amsterdam.. (83) Deel 4, 1 Mei 180-188.
____________ 1916a Idem LIX. Ibidem (90) Deel 4, 1 Juli. 296-
299.
____________ 1916b Idem LX. Ibidem (91) Deel 4, ISept. 308-
316.
^^
____
1923 Studie overdesedert 1877 ontworpen system-
en der Acari; nieuwe classificatie; phylogenetische beschouwingen..
Tijdschr. Entom. 66: 49-85.
___
1925 Acarologische aanteekeningen. LXXIX. En-
_
_
_
_
tom. Ber. Amsterdam (146) 7, 1 Nov, 26-34.
____________ 1926a Idem LXXXI. Ibidem (149) 7. 1 Mei. 97-
102.
_____________ 1926b Idem LXXXII. roidem (150) 7, 1 Juli. 119-
126.
_____________ 1926c Halarachne-Studien. Arch. Katurg., Berlin
91 (Series A) (7): 48-108.
_____________ 1926d KritischHistorischOverzicht derAcarologie
... Eerste gedeelte 850 v. Chr. Tot 1758. Tijdschr. Entom. 69:
Suppl., Oct. viii + 500.
1927a Laelaps-Studien. Ibidem 70: 163-209.
300
....
Tweede gedeeite, 1759-1804. Trjdschr. Entom (72). Suppl.
.Mei...xvii + 1097. ..
.
_______’ 1929b Acarologische aanteekeningen. XCV. En-
torn. Ber. Amsterdam (176) 8, 1 Nov. 157-172.
*1930 Idern XCIX. Ibidem 8: 11-20.
_____________ 1931 Idem CXI. Ibidem (182) 8, 1 Nov. 312-331..
______. 1932 Opus 550. Tijdschr. Entom. 75: 202-207.
1935. Kritische Literaturvibersicht zur Gattung
’
.
1936-1937 .Kritisch Historisch Overzicht der Aca-
rologie 1805-1850. E... J. Brill, Leiden, parts Ilia - nig. 3379 pp.
___________ 1939 N’eue Funde auf dem Gebiete der Systematik
und der Nomenclatur der Acari. Zool. Anz., Leipzig 126(111): 20-24;
(IV): 195-201; (V): 303-309’. , .
-
.
OVAZZA, .M. 1950 Quelques observations sur la biologle et plus par-
ticulierement Ie cycle de Liponyssus bacoti Hirst. i913. Ann. Para-
s.itol. Hum. Comp. 25: 178-187,, ,
’
"
conditions. Jour. Econ. Entom. 49: 702-703..
1?ANG, K. H. 1941 Isolation of typhus rickettsia.from rat antes during
an epidemic in an orphanage. Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. Med. 48: 266-
;,
"
267. ’"
^
’
.
.
PATTON, W. 1931 Insects, ticks, mites and venomous animals of med-
ical and veterinary importance. Part II. Public.-’Health. Croyden,
England. 740 pp.
.
PAVL’OVSKI, E. N. (Editor) 1955 Acarina of the -Rodent Fauna of
U.S.S.R. Izd. Acad. ..Sci. U.S.S.R. 59: 459pp.
PAVLOVSKI, E. N. and STEIN, A. K. 1933a On the action of Dermanys-
_______________
sus gallinae Redi on the skin of man. Entom. Qboz. 25: 104-105.
1933b Uber die Wirkung von Dermanyssus galli-
nae Redi auf die Hautdecken des Menschen. Zeitschr.. Para.zi.tenk. ,
Berlin 5: 421-424.
PAYNE, L. F. 1929 A new method of controlling feather mites. Jour.
’
PHILIP, C. B.. and HUGHES, L. E.. 1948 The tropical: rat. mite. Lip-
onyssus bacoti, as an experimental vector of rickeftsialpox. /iroer-
301
.
.
PIONTKOVSKA, 3. .P.. KORSHUNOVA, 0. S. and,GROKHOVSKA, I. M.
1954 On three natural foci. Zool. Zhur. 33: 323-3-36,’;
PIONTKOVSKA, .S. P., RUSSKIKA, P. A. and AIZENSCHTADT, D. S.
1955 To the .fauna of ectoparasites of murid rodents and Insectivora
of Transcarpathia. Vopr. Kraev. Obsch. i Eksper. Parazitol. Med.
Zool, 9: 81-85. .-;
.
.
PIONTKOVSKA, .S, P.. SIMONOVITCH. E. N. and AIZENSCHTADT,
D. S. 1955 On the conditions of man’s contact with ectoparasiies of
. : rodentgi.: -Ibidem 9: 50-54.
.
.
’
: ’
’
of rodents. Zool. Zhur. 34: 300-303.
RADFORD, .C. D.. .1937::A new species of mite of the genus Entonys s ua
..:,.;. ;.;
. Ewing. NorthWest, Naturalist 1.2: 38-42.
.
_____________^
1938a, i’Not.es on-some new parasitic mites; ’’I.’ Para-
;’
sitology 30: 427-440. .
.
___________ 1944 New parasitic mites (Acarina) from rodents.
Ibidem 35: 161-166.
____
. .
.
.
_______, -1947a JPar.asiti’c mites from snakes and rodents (A’ca-
.
rina: Cheyletidae,- Lisfrophoridae and’ Laelapti’dae). Proc.’ Zbol. ,
.
RASTEGAEVA, E. P. 1935 Experimental transmission of spirochaeto-
sis of chicks with the aid of the mites Dermanyssus gallinae. Sb.
Rab. Leningrad Vet. Inst. Leningrad 13.1-137.
RAZUMOVA, I. N. 1953 New species of gamasid mites of the family
Liponyssidae. Parazitol. Sb. Zool. Inst. Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R. 15:
339-344.
REEVES, W. C., HAMMON, W. MC D., PURMAN, D. P., MC CLURE,
H. E., and BROOKMAN, B. 1947 Recovery of western equine en-
cephalomyelitis virus from wild bird mites. (Liponyssus sylviarum)
in Kern County, California. Science 105: 411-412.
REEVES. W. C.. HAMMON, W. MCD., DOETSCHMAN, W. H., MC
CLURE, H. E.. and SATHER, G, 1955 Studies on mites as vectors
of western equine and St. Louis encephalitis viruses in California.
American Jour. Trop. Med. Hyg. 4: 90-105.
REISS. F, 1949 Rickettsialpox. a clinical review with differential di-
agnostic notes. Chinese Med. Jour. 67: 390-396.
REKK, G. F. 1952 Collectionand identification of spider and flatmites
the pest of forest vegetation. Izd. Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R. Moskva-Len-
ingrad 1-27.
RILEY, W. A. 1940a Rat mite dermatitis in Minnesota. Minnesota
Med. 23: 423.
___________ 1940b The tropical rat mite. Liponyssus bacoti, in Min-
nesota. Jour. Parasitol. 26: 433.
RILEY. W. A. and JOHAWNSEN. 0. A. 1938 Medical Entomology.
Second Ed. McGraw Hill. New York 483 pp.
RINDGE, M. E. 1952 Connecticut has first rickettsialpox outbreak.
Connecticut State Dept. Health, Connecticut Health Board 66: 73-75.
RITCHER, P. 0. and INSKO, W. M. 1948 External parasites of chic-
kens and their control. Kentucky Agric. Exper. Sta, Bull. 517: 1-23,
ROBERTS, F. H. S. 1930 A poultry mite infesting dwellings. Queens-
land Agric. Jour.. Brisbane 34: 595-596.
ROBERTSON, G. MC R. 1929 Three external parasites of poultry.
Tasmanian Jour. Agric. 1; 18-20.
ROMAN. E,, LECOARER. R. and VITAL-DUREND 1950 Deuxcasd’in-
festation humaine par des acariens du genre Dermanysse observes
dans 1’est Lyonnais. Soc. Linn. Lyon B, Mens. 19; 179-180,
ROMANOVA. V. P., BOZHENKO, R. P. and IAKOVLEV, M. G. 1954
Characteristics of the structure of a river basin type of a tularaemic
focus. TezisyDokl. Nautch. Sessii. Min. Zdrav. U.S.S.R.. A. M.N.
U.S.S.R. i Inst. Epidemiol. i Mikrobiol. Medgiz, Moskva-Leningrad
304
"
91-92. .
’
.
.
1954 Indogymum lindbergi nov. gen., nov. sp., eine
,
’
.
’
per. Med. 84: 1-6.
.
" ’1-. ____ 1947 St. Louis encephalitis: -transmission of
.
,
.
.
.
SMITH, R. 0. A. and MEHTA, D. R. 1937 Studies on typhus ...in the
Simla Hills. Part 7. Attempts to isolate a strain of XK. typhus from
wild rats. Indian Jour. Med. Res. 25: 345-349.
SMITH.-W, W. 1955. .The abundance and’distribution of the ectoparasites
of the house mouse in Mississippi. -Jour. Parasitol. 41:’ ’58-62.
SMORODINTSEV, A. A.. TCHUDAKOV, V. G.. and-TCHURILOV, A. V.
1953 Haemorrhagic nephroso- nephritis. Medgiz, Moskva-Leningrad
1-125. ’;
_
’
,
.
SOLOMIN, N. N.. UGRIUMOV. B. L. and GORBATSEVITCH. B. P.
195’3 Epidemiology and clinical aspects of infectious nephr-oso-nephri-
tis.-.Voenno-Med. Zhur. 2: ,53-59.
SOLOSHENKO, I. Z. 1955 On i&sf importance of blood-sucking’ insects
’ : and ticks in, the transmission’of1 leptospira. Tezisy Dokl. VIII. So-
.vesch.poParazitol.Probleman. Izd. Acad. Sci. U.S. S.R’., Moskva-
’ "
Leningrad .142-143.’ ’
-
SOSNINA. E. F. 1951 Parasites of mouselike rodents. Sb. "U-schelie
Kondara." -Izd. Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R., Moskva-Lenmgrad 228-239.
SPARAZANI. G. C. 1950 Acariasis of canaries. UccellidaGabbia e
.. daVoliera 8: 184-185. . -
SPENCER, G. J. 1937 The menace, o^ rat parasites in Vancouver in
.. 1936. Proc.’Entom. Soc. British.Columbia 33: 44-45.
____________ 1941 Ectoparasites of birds and mammals in British
.. Columbia, VI; preliminary list of parasitic mites. Ibidem 37: 14-18.
.STANLEY, J. 1931 Studies on the musculatory system and mouth parts
of Laelaps echidninus Berl. Ann. Entom. Soc.- America 24: 1-12.
STARK, V. N. 1931 Manual of forest pest counting, Selkhozgiz’.,
.
.
Moskva-Leningrad 1-356. .
’
Nat. last. Health Bull. (155). U. S. Publ. Health Serv. Dec. 1930,
pp. 603-742; Addenda, p. 767.
STILES. C. W. and STANLEY, J. 1932 Key catalogue of parasites re-
ported for Insectivora (moles, shrews, etc.). Nat. Inst. Health Bull.
307
’
32: -164-169. .; : :.!;,:,’.
.
1948b ’The me’sostigmatic nasal mites of birds.
I: Two new genera from shore and’marsh birds. ’3 our, Parasitol.
’: ’"’
34: 505-514.
__________’
...’
’"’ ’
’
1949 ’The
’
bloodsucking’m’ite’s’ ^
of the genus
_______
Haemolaelaps (Acarina; Laelaptidae) in the Uni’ted States. Ibidem
35: 325-352. , . .’:..
.
_________’ :,:’ ’
.
.
1956b The mesostigmatic nasal mites of birds.
IV. The species and hosts of the genus Rhinonyssus (Acarina, Rhino-
nyssidae). Proc. Entom. Soc. Washington 58; 12’9-142.
STHANDTMANN, R, W. and ALLRED, D. M. 1956 Mites of the genus
Breyisterna Keegan, 1949 (Acarina-Haemogamasidae). Jour. Kansas
Entom. Soc. 29: 113-132.
STRANDTMANN, R. W. and CAMIN, J. H. 1956 Aetholaelaps sylstrai.
a new genus and new species of mite from a Madagascar lemur. (Aca-
rina; Laelaptidae). Bull. Chicago Acad. Sci. 10: 151-161.
STRANDTMANN., R. W.. and EADS, R. B. 1947 A new species of mite,
Ichoronyssus dentipes- (Acarina: Liponyssinae), from the cotton rat,
Jour, Parasitol. 33: 51-56.
STRANDTMANN. R. W. and’EBEN, D. J. ’1953 A survey of typhus in
rats and rat ectoparasites in Galveston. Texas. Texas Repts. Biol.
Mecl. 11: 144-1.51.
STRANDTMANN, R. W. and FURMAN, D. P. 1956 A new species of,
naite, Para-neonyssua icteridius, from’-nasal cavitie.s of blackbirds.
Pan-Pacific Entom. 32; 1.67-174. :
^
a new rat ectoparasite from Samar (Acarina: Laelaptidae)’. Proc.
Entom. Soc. Washington 52: 85-87.
1951 ’Two new species of Macronyssidae, with
notes on some established genera (Acarina). Jour. Parasitol. 37:
308
’
..,460-470, : .
,
STRAND TMANN, R. W. and MORLAN, H. B. 1953 A new species of
Hirstionyssus and a key to the known species of the world. Texas
.
Rept. Biol. Med. 11: 627-637.
STBOGANOVA, A. S. 1952 Faunas of mammals of irrigated lands and
forest nurseries of the-Val.ui Experimental - Ameliorative Stations
(Stalingrad Province). Tr. Zool. Inst. Acad. Sci..U. S.S.R. 11: 214-
.234.. ... :,, ,
..
SUYEMOTO, W. and TOSHIOKA, S, 1955 ,-The distribution" of Laelap-
i
,. I1-7. ,. .. .... ’, : .
.
.TILL, W . M. 1954 Mites endoparasitic in the respiratory tract of the
cape sea Hon. Jour. Entom. Soc. S. Africa 17: 266-267.
TIRABOSCHI, C. 1904 Les rats, les souris et leure parasites cutanes,
dans leurs-rapports avec la propagation de la peste bubonique. Arch.
Parasitol. 8: 161-349.
TORKES, C. M.) LENT, H., and MOREIRA. L. F. »1951 Acarinose
das viasrespiratoriasdocanario ("Serinus canarius" L.)por "Stern-
ostoma tracheacolum" Lawrence, 1948. Rev. Brazil. Biol. 11: 399-
406.
TRAGARDH. I. 1904 Monographie der arktischen Acariden. Fauna
Arctica 4, Lief. 1: 1-78.
1910 In: WissenschaftlicheErgebenissederSchwedis-
chenZoologischen Expedition nach dem Kilimandjaro,- dem Meru und
den umgebenden Massaisteppen deutsch-ostafricas 1905-1906. (By
Yngve Sjostedt.) Band. 3. Arachnoidea (2), Acari(3): 31-58.
1912a Biospeologica, XXII. Acari (first series). Arch.
Zool,, Exper. Gen. Ser. 5: 577-578.
l912b Contributions toward the comparative morphology
and phylogeny of the Parasitidae (Gamasidae). Ark. Zool., Stock-
holm 7: 1-24.
1931 Acarina from the Juan Fernandez Islands. The
.
___
natural history of Juan Fernandez and Easter Island (.Edited by Dr.
Carl Skottsberg) 3: 553-628.
1947 The Acarina as carriers of disease. Zool. Bid-
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
rag Fran Uppsala 25: 472-488.
._________ 1952 Acarina, collected by the Mangarevan expedition
to south eastern Polynesia in 1934 by the Bernice P. Bishop Museum,
Honolulu, Hawaii. Ark. Zool., Stockholm, Series 2. 4: 45-90.
TRAUB, R., HERTIG, M,. LAWRENCE, W. H.. and HARRIS, T. T.
1954 Potential vectors and reservoirs ofhemorrhagic fever in Korea.
American Jour. Hyg. 59: 291-306.
TRAUT. I. I. 1940 To the question of ecology of the water rat. Vest.
Mikrobiol., Epidemiol. i Parazitol. 17: 364-381.
TROUESSART. E. 1894 Note sur les acariens parasites des fosses
nasales dea oiseaux. C. R. Soc. Biol.. Paris 1: 723-724.
.
"
TSYMBAL. T. G., and LITVISHKO, N, T. 1955 On ear acarias’is;’ of
cattle. Zool. Zhur. 34: 1229-1241.
TURIANIN, I. I. 1955 To the fauna of gamasid mites of Transcarpa-
thian Province. Nautch. Zap. Uzhgorod. Gos. Univ. Biol. 11:’155-
159.
TURK, F, A. 1945a Studies of Acari, second series: descriptions of
new species and notes on established forms of parasitic mites. Para-
sitology 36: 133-141.
__________ 1945b Idem, V: notes on and descriptions of new and
little known British Acari. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. Ser. 11, 12: 785-
820,
_________ 1947a A new genus and two new species of mites parasitic
on Muridae, Ibidem Ser. 11. 13: 347-354.
________ 1947b Studies of Acari, IV: a review of the lung mites of
snakes. Parasitology 38: 17-26.
________ 1950 Idem, VI: parasitic mites from mammalian hosts
obtained in’Ceylon. Ibidem 40: 63-76.
________ 1952 Idem, 7th series: ".Records and descriptions of
mites new to the British fauna, together with short notes on the biol-
ogy of sundry species." Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. Ser. 12, 5: 475-506.
________ 1953 A synonymic catalogue of British’Acari: Parti.
Ibidem ser. 12, 6: 1-99.
VAN EYNDHOVEN, G. L. 1941 Ueber die Prage der ’ Synonymic von
Spintumix euralis G. Canestrini: Uber die Periglischrus interruptus
Kolenati sowie ueber einen neuen Fledermausparasi’cen. Tijdschr.
Entom. 84: 44-67. ...
VIAZKOVA, S. P. and ZOTOVA, A. A. 1951 SK-9 preparation in the
control of ectoparasites in poultry. Veterinariia 28: 43-46.
VINCENT, L. E,, LINDGREN, D. L., and KROHNE; .H. E. 1954 Tox-
icity of malathion to the northern fowl mite. Jour. Econ. Entom. 47:
943-944.
.
VITZTHUM, H. 1920 Acarologische Beobachtungen. 2. Reihe. ’Arch.
. Naturg., Berlin (1918) 84, Abt. A, Heft 6: 1-40.
.
,’’/ ’^’_______ 1921 Idem 4. Reihe., Ibidem 86, Abt. A, Heft 7
.
(1920): 1-69.
.______________ 1925a Idem 8. Reihe- Ibidem 90, Abt. A, Heft
10: 1-86.
______________ l925b Oie unterirdesche Acarofauna. Jenaisch.
Zeitschr. Naturw. 62: 125-186.
_____^_______1926a Malayische Apart. Treubia 8: 1-198. .
____________
Zool. Anz., Leipzig 75: 181-198.
,_________
1929 Acari. Die Tierwelt Mitteleuropas, Leipzig.
3, Lief. 3, VII: 1-112.
1930 Milben als Pesttrager? Ein Beitrag zu Un-
tersuchungen der mandschurischen Peststudienkommission in Har-
bin. Der "Acarologische Beobachtungen." 18. Reihe. Zool. Jahrb.,
Jena, Abt. Syst., Okol., Geog. Tiere 60: 381-428.
1930 Pneumonyssus stammeri, ein neuer lungen-
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
parasit. Zeitschr. Parasitenk., Berlin 2: 595-615.
1931a Acari. In: Kukenthal-Krumbach Handbuch
der Zoologie, Berlin-Leipzig 3: 1-160.
I931b Neue parasitische Fledermausmilben aus
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
Venezuela. Ibidem 4: 1-47.
____________ 1931c Pneumonyssus simicola Banks. Zeitschr.
Parasitenk., Berlin 4: 48-74.
____________1935a Milben aus der NasenhoehlevonVogeln. Jour.
Ornith. 83: 563-587.
__________1935b Uber die Gattung Entonyssus Ewing (Acari).
Zeitschr. Parasitenk., Berlin 7: 709-716.
____________ 1936 Ein akarologischer Nachruf fur den "Roland."
Tierartzi. Rundschau 42: 266-269.
1940-1943 Acarina. Bronns Klassen und Ordnun-
gen des Tierreichs. 5 Band, Abt. 4, 5 Buch (in 7 parts). 1011 pp.
VOGELSANG-.WILCKENS, E. G. 1944 Contribucion al estudio de la
parasitologia animal en Venezuela. XV. A carinadelos animates do-
me’sticos y salvajes. Bol. Entom. Venezolana 3: 51-56.
VOIGTS, H. and OUDEMANS. A. C. 1904 Neue Milben aus der Umge-
gend von Bremen. Zool. Anz., Leipzig 27: 651-656.
_______________ 1905 Zur kenntnis der Milben-Fauna von Bre-
men. Abhandl. Naturw. Verein Bremen 18: 199-209.
_______________ 1905 SystematischesVerzeichnis der in der na-
heren Umgebung von Bremen gefundenen Milben, nebst Beschreibung
neuer Arten. Ibidem 18: 210-253.
VOLFERTS, A. A,. KOLPAKOVA, S. A. and FLEGONTOVA, A. A.
1934 To .the epizootology of tularemia: I. The role of ectoparasites
in the tularemic epizootology of marmots. Vestn. Mikrobiol.. Epi-
demiol. i Parazitol. 13: 103-116.
VOLTCHANETSKA, G. I. and KISELEV, K. I. 1955 To the biology of
Allodermanyssus sanguineus Hirst. Zool. Zhur. 34: 1090-1093.
VYSOTSKA, S. 0, 1953 Methods of collecting rodent nest inhabitants.
Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R... Moskva-Leningrad 1-46.
VYSOTSKA, S. 0. and KULATCHKOVA, V. G. 1953 Gamasid mites
as intermediate hosts of roundworms. Dokl. Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R.
91: 441-443.
WALTON, B. C. 1956 Identification of a trypanosome from Procyon
lotor lotor from, Maryland as Trypanosoma cruzi(Chagas). Doctoral
Dissertation, Univ. Maryland,’ College Park. 24 pp.
WARREN, E, 1940 On the genital system of Dermanyssus gallinae (de
312
’
’
,
’37-45.
WEDStMAN, C. J. 1950’ Pest control technology. Entomological Sec-
tion. Nat. Pest Control Ass,, Inc. New York.
WHARTON. G. W. 1938 Acarina of Yucatan Caves. Carnegie mst.
Washington 491: 137-152.-
_____________ 1957 Intraspecific variation in ’the parasitic Aca-
rina. Syst. Zool. ’6: 24-28.’
WHARTON, G. W. and CROSS, H. F, 1957 Studies on the feeding hab-
its of three species of laelaptid mites’. Jour. Parasitol. 43: 45-50.
WILCOMB. M. J., JR., GRIFFITH. M. E. and ELLIS. L. L. 1952 Com-
. mensal rat ectoparasite collections in Oklahoma. Publ. Health Mono-
gr. No. 5. Part 3: 33-37.
WILLIAMS, R. W. 1946 The laboratory rearing of the tropical rat mite,
Liponyssus bacoti (Hirst). Jour. Parasitol. 32: 252-256,
_____________ 1948 Studies on the life cycle of Litomosoides ca-
rinii, filariid parasite of the cotton rat, Sigmodon hispidus litoralis.
Ibidem 34: 24-43. .’
.
WILLIAMS, R. W. and BROWN. H. W. 1945 ThEi’aeve)opmeiri. pf Lito-
mosoides carinii, filariidparasite of the cotton rat in the tropical rat
";
:;
’
’
mite, Uponyssus-bacoti. Science 102: 482-483.
________:______ 1946 The transmission of Litomosoicies’ .carmii,
filariid parasite of the cotton rat; by the tropical rat mite, Liponys-
’ ’
’
WILLMANN, CARL 1936 Steatonyssus spinosus, eine neue Milbe von
Solenodon paradoxus l^fdt. Zool. Ahz., Leipzig 114’; 152-157.
’1939’a InNordwestdeutschlandneuAuftretendelas-
’
’ ’
tige Milben. Abhandl. Naturw. Ver. Bremen 31: 168-178,
______________ 1939b Die Arthropoden fauna von Madeira nach
den Ergebhissen der Reise von Prof. Dr. 0, Lundblad. Juli-August
1935. XIV. Terrestrische Acari (exkl. Ixodidae). Ark. Zool. Stock-
holm 31: 1-42.
____________
___
1943 Parasitische Milben von Kleinsaugern aus
:
’
.
dem Schnieeberggebiet; Mitteil. Biol. Sta. Hbfeberg, Schles.. Ges.
Vaterl. Crilt. 116: 62-72, .
___
’
.
1’954 Two new ’species of ectoparasitic m.ites from
pouched mice, Sminthopsis; from Australia. Ibidem. 11: 117-120.
’ 1955 The acarine fauna of mutton birds’ nest’s on a
Bass Strait Island. Australi’an Jour. Zool. 3: 412-438.
_1956a A new genus and two new species of Acarina
from northern Australia. Proc. Linn. Soc. ’N’ew South Wales’ 80:
214-216.
_l,956b. On some new Acarina-Mesostigl-nata’from Aus-
tralia, New Zealand and New Guinea. Linn. Soc. Jour.-Zool. 42:
50.5-599.
WOOD, H. P. 1.917 -The chicken mite: its life history and habits. U. S.
Dept. Agric. Bull; 553: ’14 pp.
’1920 -Tropical fowl mite in the United States, with notes
of life history and control. U. S. Dept. Agric. Circ. 79: 8 pp.
WOODROFFE/G.’E. -1953 An ecological study of the insects and mites
of certain birds in’. Britain. Bull. Entom. Res. 44: 739-772.
WOODROFFE. Gt.’E.- and SOUTHGATE, B. J. 1951 Birds’nests as a
source of domestic pests. Proc. Zool. Soc. London 121: 55-62.
WORTH, C. B. 1950a’ Observations ori ectoparasites of some small
mammals in Everglades National Park and Hillsborough County, Flor-
ida. Jour. Parasitol. 36: 326-335,-
1950b A preliminary host-ectoparasite register for
some small mammals of Florida. Jodr. Parasitol. 36: 497-498,
WORTH, C. B. and RICKARD, E. R. 1951 Evaluation of the efficiency
of common cotton rat eetoparasites in the transmission of murine
typhus. American Jour. Trop. Med. 31: 295-298.
WURM, H. *1926 Ueber eine’ Milbenerkrankung der Lunge bei Macacus
rhesus. Centralbl. Bakteriol. Parazitenk, Infekt. 98: 514-521^
YAMADA, S. 1932 Observations on a house-infesting mite (Liponyssus
’3.14
nagayoi n. sp.) which attacks human beings, rats, and other domestic
animals, with.brief notes of experiments regarding the possibility of
’the plague transmission, by means of this mite. Far. East. Ass.
’’Trop,.Med,. Trans.,8th Congr. 2: 358-372. : :
’
yUNKER. C. E. ’1954 Studies on the acarine parasites, mites, of My-
ptis lucifugus ( Le Conte.). Master’s Disseration. Uni.’/; Maryland,
College Park. 67pp. . , .. ...
.^;________ 1955 Control red mites. All Pets Mag. 26: 20, 38-40.
____, 1956 Studies on the snake.mite.. Ophionyssus natricis,
’
215-249. .
and descriptions of three new species. An. Inst, Med. Trop. 10:
: .
._______________ 1954a The genus Steatonyssus Kolenati in
’ :.
the Ethiopian region (Acarina:’ Laelaptidae). Jour. Entom. Soc;; S.
Africa 17; 47-57.
’
’
.
.
’
_____________/___^ 1954c The lung and nasal mites .of the genus
Pne’umonys sus Banks (Acarina: Laelaptidae) with description of two
new species from African primates. Jour. Entom-. S.oo. S.. Africa
17: 195-212.
’
’
- .’ . ... .. ....’.
’
.
Acarus, 65, 102., 115, ’1,20. 121. amphibius, Laelaps, 5,7, 67
’ "..
’
.
.
acuminatus, Spinturnix, 184 anatomy, 15
aegyptius, Allodermanys.sus, 119 anatomy, external, 15
aegyptius, Haemolaelaps. 33 anatomy, internal, 18
.
aethippi.cus, Hirstionyssu.s, 104
’
Ancy.stropus, 183
aethiopicus, Laelaps, 59 androgynus, Haemolaelaps, 33
.
aethiopicus, Ornithonyssus, 85 Androlaelaps, 196. 197
aethiopicus, Spinfurnix, 18^ andropadi.. Ptilonyssus, 179
’
Aetholaelaps, 32, 7^ angrensis, Cas, J_69
affinis, Hirstionyssus, 100. angus’tiscntis, Haemolaelaps. 3.3
afribyx, Rhinonyssus, 158 anomalus, Mesolaelaps, 54
africa,na, Manitherionyssi,is. 143 Antennophorina, 2, 196 . .
.
ala?kensis. Haemogamasus,. 129, anus, 18
’i’32, 133 .’ aplodontiae, Alphalaelaps, 193,
.
alaskensis, Laelaps, 59 194
albatp-affinis, Hirs’ti.onyssus, 102 apus, Rhinonyssus, 158
albatus, Hirstionyssus, 99 arabicus, Ophionyssus, 97
alberti, Rhinonyssus, 158 Arachnida, 1
algericus, Laelaps, 59 aragonensis, Echinolaelaps, 73
allergy, 4 araguensis, Spinturnix, 185, 186
Allodermanyssus, 77, 78. 118, Aramite, 6
120 arcualis, Eulaelaps, 127
AHonyssus, 91_ arcuatus, Hirstionyssus, 99
Alphalaelaps, 193 ardeae, Neonyssus, 161
amboingnsis, Spinturnix, 184 aristoterisi, Pneumophionyssus,
ambularig, Haemogamasus, 4, 13, 147
139. 130, 131 armatus, Ischyropoda, 137
americana, Halarachne, 149 .? arnhemlandensis, Sauronyssus,
americana, Ophiopneumicola, 14.6
aniericsjius, Dermanyssus, 122
66.
artibiensis, Spinturnix, 185
[317]
318
.
1927, 58, 65’ ’ ’’." bibikovae, Oryctolaelaps, 71. 72
arvicolarum, Haemogamasus, 132 biscutatus, Pellonyssus. 116.
;
Ascaidae, 27 ’’’" ’:i "
bi’spihosus. Neopars.laelaps, 53
assimilis, Laelaps,-60 ’ blanchardi, Hirstionyssns. Troues-
’
astridae, Paraneonyssus, 176 sart, 1904,. l0\_
’. :
’
Astridiella, 173, 174
’
’:
blanchardi.. Hirstionyssus, Zemska,
atheruri. Rhinophaga, 154 1951, 103 ., .’
_
athleticus, Radtordiella, 117, 118 Bolivilaelaps,. 31, 45
.
,
.
Atrlcholaelaps, 32^
’
boydi. Sternostoma, .166
.
attenuata, Orthohalarachne, 149,’ brachypeltis, Steatqnys.s.us, 113
150 : ’ brachy’spinosus.. .Gigantolaelaps, ^0
atypicus, Echinolaelaps, 73 brasiliensis, Liponysspides, 120
aureliani Ptilonyssus,’ 179
;1’’’-’’’
’ braziliensis,. Cavilaelaps, 48
auris, Ratllietia, 141 braziliensis, Ornithonyssus, 85
australicus, Ichoronyssus, 90 bregetovae, Hirstionyssus, 101
.
australiensis, Mesolaelaps, 54 ’ bresslaui, Cayilaelaps.. 47, 48
.
Australolaelaps, TS^ 98 ’ "’ brevis, Dermanyssus, 122 ..
.
avisugus, Haemogamasus,: 131 breviseta, Hirstionyssus, 199, 101
a»i.um, Dermanyssus, :.l2.1:’ Brevisterria, 9, 126, 136, 1.99, 268
’
avium, Steatonyssus, ’1’13
’
’
britteni, Hirstesia, 111
brucei. Steatonyssus,, 114
bacoti, Ornithonyssus, 4, 5, ’6,’7, b’ubuici, Neonyssus, .1.62
8, 9, 10, 11,. 12, 14,81, 82, buloloensis, Celaenopsoides, 192,
8^, 86, 200, 261, 262, 269 I93
’
bacteria, 3 ;’
bursa, 6.rrii.thony.s,sus,.. ,5. 8, 9. tO,
Bdellonyssus, 81 11, 12, QQ, 198, 261,. 262
bakeri, Laelaps, 60 ’ burrows, 198, 199. .
’
... .
Banksia, 196
’
buxtoni, Laelaps., 61_ .. .:
barbatus. Liponysella. ’112
barberi, Haemogainasus, 131 calamocichlae, I’Ptilony.ssus, 179
bathyergus, Haernolaelaps, 34 calcaratus, .Spinturnix, 1.8,5 .:.;,..
batis, Sternostoma, 167 caledonicutn., Rhinonyssus, 158.
bedtordi, Hamertonia, 146
behavior, T_ :
belopolskii, Neonyssus, 162
. ’
caledpnicus,. Rhinpn.yssu.s^ 158
califorriicus, Haemolaelaps, 38
.caligus, Periglischrus, 189, 190
benzene hexachloride, 6 camera spermatis, 23
319
’
.; .
distribution, 198 :;
.
.
.
culture methods. 267; - , dorsal plates, 25
-
.
.
.
cynomys, .Hirstionyssus, 1&3, 106 duttoni, Spirochaeta, 84
dryoscopi. Paraneonyssus, 177
dartevelle.i, ..Rhinonyssus, 159
dasymys, Haemolaelaps. 35 easti, Ophionyssus, 97’
Dasyponyssidae, 2. 2.9. 1.42 echidninus, Echinolaelaps. 4, 7,
Dasyponyssus, 142, 143 8,.-9, 10; 13, 14, 18. ^2,
.
.
dauricus,, Haemogamasus, 132 > 200, 261, 262. 269
davisi, Haemolaelaps, 36 echiriatus, Ptilonyssus,’ 178
Davisiella, .196. . .
.
echinipes, Rhinonyssus, 15.7
DDT., 5. 6..7 .
echinipes, Spinturnix. 185, 1’86
debilis, Eubrachy.lae.lapa, -.49 .
Echinolaelaps, 32, n_
decumani, Myonyssus, 124 .
Echinonyssus, 78, 109 ’
.
decussatus, Hirstionyssus, 100,. echinus, Neolaelaps,’ 112
102 .. , ... ecological factors, 199
.
.
,
degeneratus, Heterozercon, 192 economic importance," ’3
dendropicus, Ornithonyssus, ..87: ectostracum, 17’.
.
dentipes, Neoichoronyssus,. 108’.. :
eggs,’ 11, 23^
dermal glands.,.. 18 :
’
,
ejaculatory duct, 22
Dermanyssidae, 2, 9, 10, 16, 23, ekstremi, Laelaps, 61 ’
24. 25, 28,. ^77, 1.41, 194.. elaph’es, Ophiopneunaicola, 146
.
196, 267 ellipsoideus, Haemogamasus, 132’
Dermanyssinae,. 78, 118 .
ellipticus, Macronyssus, JU
.
Dermanyssus, 17, 77.. 78,. 120, ellobii, Haemolaelaps; 36
1:74 ,,... ... .. .. ellobii, Hirstionyssus. 103
.
dermatitis, 4. .. ... . . .: Ellsworthia, 139
"
differens, Laelaps, 61 .:
encephalitis, St. Louis. 3; 83,"1.21
digestive system,, j^ ,. encephalitis. Western’equine, 3;
’
. , .
;:
diminuata. Orthohalarachne, ,150 83;- 121 : ’ ’:’
Diplostaspis, 183 :, ,, .
enrietti, Paraneonyssus. 176
disease transmission, 3, 86 Entonyssidae, 2, 29. 143
321
.
eos,: Haemolaelaps, .3.8 ,,:.. 8, 9, 10, 12. 14. 86, 120,
.
eos, Steatonyssus, 114 :,: ; ;.- 121, 122..: 12,3,..198, 200.
epigynial plate, 24 ; ’,: :;. . ,. 261, 262, 268 ... ,
.
.
.
.
.
Eubrachylaelaps, 16, 31, 4.8.,; 196 genital plate, 24,.’2 6
Eugynolaelaps, 196 : .
genital pore, 23. 25
Euhaemogamasus, 129 genitoventral plate, 24
’
Eulaelaps, 25. 126. 139, 196, 20.0 geographical distribution, 199, 262
euryalis, Spinturnix, 186. geomydis, Hirstionyssus, 103
eusoricis, Hirstionyssus, 103 geomys, Haemolaelaps, 37, 261
evers:manni, Hirstionyssus, 103 georgicus, Hirstionyssus, 103
Eviphididae, 27 geotaxis, 20
.
evotomydis, Dermanyssus, 122 giganteus, Echinolaelaps, 74
ewingi, Entonyssus, 144 giganteus, Laelaps, 60
ewingi, Haemolaelaps, 36 Gigantolaelaps, 31, 50, 196
ewingia, Spinturnix, 186 gigas, Myonyssus, 124, 125
exceptipnalis, Laelaps, 62 gilmorei, Gigantolaelaps, 51
excretory system, 19 glasgowi, Haemolaelaps, 9. 10,
eyes, 20 13, 14, y!_, 199, 200, 261,
"eye spots, " 21 262
glasmacheri, Entonyssus, 145
fahrenhoizi, Haemolaelaps, 37 glutinimargo, Periglischrus, 190
farrieri. Hemilaelaps. 139 glutinbsus, Ichoronyssus, 91
Pednzzioidea. 2 gnathosoma, 1, 15. 197
feeding, 11 gnathosomal base ring, 15
female. 24 Gneidolaelaps, 38, 112
festinus, Laelaps, 58, 59 gordonensis, Sauronyssus, 96
filaria, 82, 84, 85 goyanensis, Gigantolaelaps, 51
finlay soni, Laelaps, 62 grandis, Echinolaelaps. 74
Flavionyssus, 156, 171 grandis, Rhinoecius, 165
flavus, Ichoronyssus, 91 granulbs.us, Ichoronyssus, 91
Fonsecaonyssus, 81 gravity, response to, 9, 10
food, 2, 198 grenieri, Laelaps, 62
forsythi, Ichoronyssus, 89,90,91 griffithi, Pneumonyssus, 151
fowl pox. 82 griseisciuri. Hepatozoon,: 4
foxi, Pneumonyssus, 151 grossus, Spinturnix, 186
fragilis, Entonyssus, 145 grubei, Laelaps, 64
freemani, Haemolaelaps, 34. ~
guanin, 20
’
funnel, Berlese, 263 Gymnolaelaps. 198
furmani, Ischyropoda, 138.
-
,
,
.. 132 :
.
.
.
.
.
,
hamertoni, Ophiopneumicola, -.146 hosts. 199,’ 215 .
.
-
.
hapaloti, Laelaps, 62 hubbardi. Patrinyssus, 10 9.’
harperi, Haemogamasus, 132; human habitation, mites in, 5
’
’
.
.
hasei, Ichoronyssu’s, 89, 92 :, .
humidity, response’to, 8, .10
hawaiiensis, Laelaps,. 66 .;... , hutsoni, Sternosto’ma, 167 : . ’"
heart, 19 .".,..V; ., hydrophilus. Pseudomonas,. 4,’ 98’
heat, response to, 7, 10 : .... Hyletastinae, 27 . ...
.
... .
.
.
helminths, 3, 4 ...
.
.. Hyperlaelaps.- ^7, ’67
.
.
.
Hemilaelaps Ewing; 138, .139 Hypoaspidinae. 27, 196
Hemilaelaps Hull, J.26. : ., hypoaspidine. 197
Hepatozoon, 4, 73 Hypoaspis, 32. 127. 19 6;’ 197 :
hermanni, Ichoronyssus, .,9.5 hypodermis, 17
heterodontus, Entonyssus, 145-
~~-... hypopharyngeal processes,’ 16’’’’
,
Heterolaelaps, 31, 3.2,, ,55 hypopharynx;’.18’ ’
.
.
heteromydis, Steptolaelaps, .56. hypostome, 15 r ’.
’
.
heteromys, Steptolaelaps, 56. hypostomal processes, ’18, 19’’
heterotarsus, Manitberionyssus,. hypostracum. 1_7
142,14_3 . ,:
hystrici, Haemolaelaps; 39_
.
.....
.
Heterozercon, 192.
’
Heterozerconid.ae, 2,.28;"^&1 .
ianzai. Spinturnix. 185 ’’
hilaris, Laelaps, 57, 56. 63. 69 Ichoronyssus, 80, 85, 89, 200,
hilaroides, Laelaps, 62 . . 261, 262
.
.
.
hilli. Hirstionyssus, 104 .
icteridius, Paraneonyssus, n7
himantopus, Rhinonyssus, 19., 158 idiosoma. 15, 16 ’ ’
.
.
liponyssoides, Ixodorhyncbus, 138 matogrosso, Lepronyssoides, 110
Liponyssus, 81, 143 maur’itanicus, Haemolaelaps, 41
Liroaspina, 1 .’;’.. mawsoni, Haernogamasus, 135
Liroaspoidea, 1. maximus, Gigantolaelaps, 52
Litomosoides, 84, 85, 200 mazzai, Laelaps, 64
.
lobatus, Ichoronyssus, 91_ meddal, Sternostonia, 167
longevity, 14 medical importance. 3_
longimanus. Macronyssus, 81 megaventralis, Haemolaelaps, 34^
longipes, Haemolaelaps, 40 Megisthanoidea, 2
longiseta, Pililaelaps, 196 melittophagi, Ptilonyssoides, 170;
longisetosus. Ichoronyssus. 93 melloi, Neonyssus, 163
longiventris, Laelaps. 64: .’ melomys. My s olael ap s, 7 6
Longolaelaps, 32, 7_1 .: meprai, Ornithonyssus, 88
longulus, Longolaelaps, 7.1 meridensis, Periglischrus, 191
Lopbotes, 82 meridianus, Hirstionyssus, 105
lophuromius, Haemolaelaps, 41_ meridionalis, Radfordilaelaps. 53,
’
:
lung mites, 3 54 :
,
lutzi, Ornithonyssus. 8J Meristaspis, 183
luzonensis, Ophlomegistus, 192, Mesolaelaps, 31, 54 ;.,.,.. .
’
193 mesopicus, Haemolaelaps, 41 ,,.
metapodaltol:ates,’24, 25’...^^. ..^.
~
Microgynioidea, 1 ... ;:., ,
.
Macronyssus, 78, 80, 8J_ micromydis, Laelaps, 58,. j[5 ’...,
macroventralis. Haemolaelaps, 41 microspiriosus, Mysolaelaps,. ,.7.6;.
madagascariensis, Liponysella, microti, Haemogamasus, 131
112 ;, microti, Haemolaelaps, j58 ,;
.
magellanica. Orthohalarachne. 150 microti, Laelaps, 65
’
. .
,1-12. Microtilaelaps, 58 ’ .
. . .
.
’
male, 25 midgut, J_8, 19’
’
-
morlani, Brevisterna, 137 nagayoi, Ornithonyssus, 10, 84
morlani, Haemolaelaps, 41 namrui, Haemolaelaps, 42
morsitans, Ornithonyssus, 86 nasutus, Echinonyssus. 109
’
mosquensis, Laelaps, 65 natalensis. Haemolaelaps, 42
"
’
: "
’
152 natricis, Opbionyssus, 4. 6, 7, 9,
:
motacillae, Ptilohyssus, 180 .10, 11, 12, 14,. 31, 22, 97_,
mounting medium, ’Ber’lese’s, 2’64, 144, 261,.,267, 269
:
265 ’’’ ’
natricis, Ophiopneumicola, 146 .
.
.
.
mountijig mediuto’, MethoceUul’ose, Neonyssus, 25, 27,, 157, 161, 174
;
’"
:" i
’ ’
:’"
286 -" :’
’
Neonyssoides, 161
mounting medium, polyvinyl alco- Neoparalaelaps. 30, 53
hol, S64; 266 ’ Neospinolaelaps, 79^ 98
mounting methods, 264 neotis, Vitznyssus, 175
mouthparts, 1 : .
neotomae, Hirstionyssus. 106,
.
.
mulleri, Spin’turnix, ’184 : 199
.
multispinosus, Laelaps, 65, 199,
’ "" ~- nervous system, ^0 ’
.
’
i
’ " ’
’
262 nests, .2. 198 .
.
.
Mungosiicola; 195 Newcastle^ disease, 3, 83
muricola, Echinolaelaps. 74 ngami, Hirstionyssus. 106
murinus, Haemolaelaps, 41 nicotine .sulphate, control with, 6
murinus, Spinturnfai:, 183, 188 nidi, Haemogamasus, 130, 131
murinus, Steatonyssus, 113 nidiformes, Haemogamasus, 1.34
muris, Hepatozodn, 73 nitzschi, Rhinonyssus, 174, 176
muris, Laelaps, 4, 57, j65, 66 nitzschi, Vitznyssus.’ 173, 174,
muris, Liponyssoides, 120 175 ,
musculature, 18 noctulae, Hirstionyssus, 100
musculi, Hirstionyssus, 105 nova-guinea. Scissuralaelaps, 196
musculi, Parasitus,: 10() nova-guineae, Rhinonyssoides,
musculi, Ste’atonyssus, 113, 115
’
173
Myolaelaps, 58 novae-hollandae, Spinturnix. 188
Myohyssinae, 77, 124 novikovae, Laelaps. 66
Myonyssoides, 194’ novus, Eulaelaps, 128
Myonyssus, 77, 124 nucifragae, Neonyssus, 161, 163
myoti, Spinturnix, 183 nudus, Paraneonyssus, 177
myrmecophagus, Sauronyssus, 97 nudus. Ptilonyssus, 177, ’180
326
-
nyassae, Steatonyssus, 115 ;
ovalis; ..Haemogamasus, 130
nyctinomi, Ichoronyssus, 93 ovary, 23^ ’ ’
.
olfaction, 20 .
palps, 1, 16-
.
oliffi,. Haemolaelaps, 42, papiohis, Rhinophaga, 154
.
omahonyi, Spintumix, 188
. paradoxus, Tympanospinctus, 195
omnitectus, Haemolaelaps; 42 Paralaelaps, 53
ondatrae, Ornithonyssus. 88 ’. .
Parameglstidae, 2, 192
onychomydis, Haeinogam-asus, Paramelaelaps, 63
129, 130 .. paranensis, Trav’anyssus, 171
.
Onychopalpida, 1 Paraneonyssus, 156, 1’76
Ophidilaelaps, 139. ’. .
parapodal plates, 24, 25
.
Ophiomegistus, -16, 27, 192, 197 Parasitoidea, 1.-2, 4, 27, 28
Ophionyssus, 24, 25, 77. .78, 97^ Parasitus, 100
Ophiopneumicola, 144,: 145 .: .
parthenogenesis, 11. 22
;
opisthosoma, 15 parvanalis, Laelaps,’^5
oraniensis, Laelaps, 67 parvispinosus, Mysblaelaps, 76
.
orblcularis, Larinyssus, 25, 160 parvulus, Laelaps; 68
orcadensis, Macronyssus, 81 passeri, Pellonyssus, 10, 116
oregonensis, Hae-mogamasus, 130’ ’"
Pasteurella. 4, 84
Oribatei,. 200 patavinus, Ornithonyssus, 82
oribatoides, Eulaelaps, 128 patersoni, Haemolaelaps, 43
orientalis; Ptilonyssus, 181 : pathogenicity, 3
orioli, Ptilonyssus; 181 Patrinyssus, 79, 109
Ornithonyssus, 17, 24, 77. 80,’ 81, pauli, Hirstionyssus. 107
200, 269 paulistanensis, Laelaps. 6S
Orthohalarachne. 148, 149 pavlovskyi, Laelaps, 59’. 68
Oryctolaelaps, 31, 71-. pedalis. Eulaelaps, 129
.
oryzomydis, Laelaps, 67 pedipalps, I, 15
otariae, Orthohalarachne, .151
. Pellonyssus, 77, 78, 116
oti, Dermanyssus. 123 pereirai, Lepronyssoides, 110
oti, Rhinoecius, 164 ... periblepharus, Steatonyssus. 113
.
otomys, Hirstionyssus, 100, 106 Periglischrus,- 183, 189.’262
:
oudemansi, Gigantolaelaps, 52 peritremal plate, 24
’
oudenaansi, Haenaogamasus, 135’ peritremalia, 25
.
oudemansi, Heterozercon, 192 peritreme, 22, 23
oudemansi, Radfor-diella. 117, 118 peruvianus,’ Gigantolaelaps, 52
32?
’
.
.
pharynx, 1, 18, 19
phoeniculi, Haemolaelaps, 43 "Q" fever, 54: "
’
;.’" ’ ’
’
’
" ’;
_17, 77
’
pilus dentilis, 196
’
.
’
pipistrellae, Hirstionyssus, 100 quintus, Dermanyssus, "123
pipistrelli, Steatonyssus, 114, 115
pipistrellus, Splnturnix, 188 rabelloi, Flavionyssus, 171
~~
’
pitymidis, Laelaps. 68 Rad, 196
:
"’’’"
plecotinus, Spinturnix, 188 radfordi, Haemolaelaps, 43
’
ploceanus, Paraneonyssus, 178 Radfordiella, 80, 117
;’
Pneumonyssoides, 148, 154 Radfordilaelaps, 31, 53
Pneumonyssus. 148, 151 Raillietia. 141 : :
Pneumophi.onyssus, 143, 144, 147 Raillietidae. 2. 3, 10, 28, MO
’
rickettsia, 3, 73 Sejus, 69
rickettsialpox, 4, 84 semidesertus, Haemolaelaps, 45
rileyi, Entonyssus, 145 semilunaris, Spinturnix, 189
robustipes. Ichoronyssus, 89, 90., semitectus, Laelaps, 69
92, 94, 95 serdjukovae. Haemogamasus, 136
robustipes, Laelaps, 68 serini, Paraneonyssus, 178
Rochanyssus, 156, 171 .,,;,;,:.: Serpehticola, 9T_
rodhaini, Pneumonyssus, 153 serpentium, Ophionyssus, 97
rose-innesi, Ornithonyssus, 88 serraoi, Neonyssus, 163
rosmari, Orthohalarachne, 150 setae. j_7
rossicus, Myonyssus, 125 !
setiger, Laelaps,; 67^
rotenoi?e, 5 sh’ib’atai, Myonyssus, 125
rothschildi, Mysolaelaps. 76 sicula; Laelaps, 69
rotundus, Eubrachylaelaps, .SO signiodoni, Haemolaelaps, 38
roubaudi, Laelaps, 6Q_ . simicola, Pneumonyssus, 151
.
ruandae, Ptilonyssus, 182 similis, Pellonyssus, 117
Ruandanyssus. 157, 165 simillimus, Laelaps. 69
sinusitis, 3
sairae, Ptilonyssus, 182 sminthopsis, Laelaps, 69
salivary glands, j_9 ; snake mites, 6, 9
salivary stylets, 16, 19 .’..’ Sommatericola, 157
sangsteri, Hae molaelaps, ;.’4’4^ soricis. Hirstionyssus, Turk,
sanguineus, Allodermanyssus. 4, 1945.. 107 ’^i^ ’:
.
5, .10, ,12, 14, 118, 119 soricis, Hirstionyssus, Zemska, ;
sanguineus, Echinolaelaps, 72, 75 : ;"-. ’,.’.’.
1955. 103
.
sanguineus, Ornithonyssus, 83,. 84 soricis, Laelaps. 69 .i-,:.i
sanguisugus, Echinolaelaps, 72’,’ 75 souzai, Rhinonyssoides, 173 ,
santos-diasi, Hirstionyssus, 107 "spaltorgane, " 21
santos-diasi, Pneumonyssus, 153 spatulatum’,’ Sternostoma, 168
saurarum, Sauronyssus, 96 spatuliformis. Haemolaelaps, ^5
Sauronyssus, 78, 80, £H> special senses, 20^
scalopi, Haemolaelaps,. 38 spegazzinii, Haemolaelaps, 45
scapularis, Haemolaelaps, 44 Spelaeprhynchidae, 2. 28, 141
Shizogynildae, 196. ; . Spelaeorhynchus, 142-
schoutedeni, Hainertonia, 147 spencei, Geneiaddlaelaps, 196
schoutedeni, Neonyssus,. "163 sperm, 22
schoutedeni, Pn^umonysBus, 153 spermatodactyl, 26
Scissuralaelaps, 196 ’i . ... : .
spermatophore, 1’3, 22
sciureus, Haemolaelaps, .45 .. ;-^ , spinifer, Laelaps, 70^
sciurinus, Hirstionyssus,, :_107 spinlger, Ischyropoda, 137
sciuropteri, Haemogamasus, 130 spiniger, Laelaps. 1^5.:
scotophili, Spinturnix, 189 spinitarsus, Haemolaelaps, ^5
scotornis, Vitznyssus, 173, 174, Spinolaelaps, 80. 95
175 ;.; spinosulus, Haemolaelaps, 45
sculpturatus, Echinolaelaps, 75. spinosus, Eubrachylaelaps, 50
scutatus, De.rimanyssus, 123 spinosus, Ichoronyssus, 94
scutatus, Ichoronyssus, 89, 90 spinosus.. Myonyssoides, 195
segmentation,. 15 spinosus..’ Steatonyssus, 113, 115
329
.
195, 267 tenuiscutatus, Ornithonyssus, 84
Spinturnix. 183. 190, 200, 262 terpsiphonei, Ptilonyssus, 182
Spirochaeta, 84 terpsiphonei, Ruandanyssus, 165
spirochaetosis, 4 testis, 2ji
spreo, Haemolaelaps, ^46 Tetragonyssus, 65, 6,6, 67, 124
squamosus, Rhinonyssoides, 173 texensis, Ichoronyssus, 89, 94
stabularis, Eulaelaps. 126,. 127, thalacdmys, Mesolaelaps, 55_
128, 200. 261 thamnomys, Laelaps, 70
staffordi, Hirstionyssus, 7.7, 107 thienponti, Sternostoma, 168
stammeri, Pneumonyssus, 153 thompsoni. Laelaps, 70_
Steatonyssus, 77, 78, 113,.. 2 62 thori, Laelaps, T0_
stegemani, Haemolaelaps, ,38 tinae, Orni1,honyssus, 88
Steptolaelaps. 31, .56. 72 Tinaminyssus, 157, J61, 170
sternalis, Haemogamasus., 130 Toxaphene, 6
sternalis, Haemolaelaps. jl6 trachea, 21_ .
.
Ugandolaelaps, 1.95 :; v:ttzthumji., Ornithonyssus, 89
.
.
uncinatus, Liponyssus, 89. viizthuBiii,;, Vitanyssus, 175, 176.
uniscutatus, Tur, 118 volgensis, Laelaps, 71
.
Uroppdina, 1’.’. ’:
’
:.
,1. .
Uropodoidea, 1. .;: .’ , ,
walkerae. Spintumix, 189
utahensis, Brevisterna, 9, 10, 136 waterstoni, Rhinonyssus, 159
uterus, 23 wernecki, Neoichoronyssus. 108
’
.
.
.
werneri, Rochanyssus, 171
validipes, Echinonyssus, 1,10 wetmorei, ,;L.aelap£i. 71
.
vansoBiereni, Echinolaelaps,,’7.5 wolffsohni. Gigantolaelaps, 52
vargasi,;Periglischrus, 191 .
.
viator, Pellonyssus, 117 :. . zulu, .Haernolaelaps, 47
.
.
viduae. PtUonyssus, 182 zumpti, Andreacarus, .7,5
viduus, Spintumix, 189. zurnpti. Laelaps,, ’n_.
.
* ^ ».iji *);!*»>!<*
-2-
-5-
.7-
-9-
as
^1g s
§
"
§
lx,
a)
(,
^*- 0)
iS&
£^
o a
s Li (^
^^
>
(1) 03
<=
^ 3
in >
h CS
^
(i)
a
h 0
.10-
§i
Ea
-12-
|L-
Ib
H.21
a1;
ll
13-
-
-14-
-15-
-16-
-17-
- 18-
a
82
»
§s
g.f
h-ti
-19-
-20-
-23-
-25-
-26-
.28-
^\7> .
FIGURE 41. Ophionyssus natricis. female: _A, ventral and dorsal views ;
B, chelicera; C, tritosternum. (’From Camin, 1953.)
-29-
-30-
-31-
-32-
g
>
§
h-!
II
^^
"Is
S-o’l
a.l,-
ce £-
& ai
as5
Ea2
oi
-33-
1
«?
a
I
-34-
35-
-36-
.37-
-38-
-39-
FIGURE 55. Tur umscuta^us, female. (From Turk, 1946.)
-40-
-41
-
-43-
-44-
.45-
-46-
* -y
’s
a2
^R
a
a ao
s?
a v
gj
.as-,
-47-
-48-
-49-
-50-
-51 -
-52-
-53-
«\%
^1
.sl-h
s
nl§
i,ga
III
a
h-|fl|
ajl o|
«M|
§11
P >
a’-’s’l
^s
S9
a^
^&
5^
g§
-3^
fl£0
.
Bin
.I?
.54-
FIGURE 77. Rallinyssus caudistigmus: 1_5, female tarsus I; 16, fe-
male chelae; 1T_. female dorsnna; 18. female venter; IJJ, male venter;
20, male chelae; 31, female gnathosoma. (From Strandtmann, 194B.>
-55-
FIGURE 78. Meonyssus genaidurae. ^, female chela; 2, male chela;
3, tarsus I of female; 4. female genital, plate; E^, female dorsum; Q.
male ventral plate; 7, male anal plate; Q, female venter; j). per-itreme
and associated plate; 10, male venter; 11^ female gnathosoma, dorsal
view; ^_2, female palpal tarsus; 13, female gnathoso.ma, ventral view,
(From Crossley, 1952.)
-56-
-57-
-58-
-59-
-60-
FIGURE 83. Tinamj.nyssus trappi, female: dorsum FIGURE 84. Flavionyssus rabelloi. female; dorsum
and chela.(After Peretra and Castro, 1949.) and chela. (After Castro, 1948.)
^URE 86. Travanyssus paranensis: female dorsum. FIGURE 85. Rochanyssus werneri: female dorsum.
ter Castro, 1948.1 (After Castro, 1948.)
-61-
FIGURE 88. yj.tznyssus sp., female: 1^ venter; 2, dorsum; ^, chela;
4, gnathosoma and tectum; 5, stigma and peritreme. (Original,)
-63-
-64-
-65-
-66- ;
;
-67-
^
s"""
lu
S.o-12
Ifl
jli
s^a
11"
§ e "i
’3aleS «
a
a^^2-g&
<lg §
^ S
§!D JB S
-*-’
^
a>
g Mli
E.a a
go
3 g
B-S
’s’1
rtl’0
a
2§
§0
0 a
as
di 0
-68-
-69-
CONTRIBUTIONS OF THE INSTITUTE OF ACAROLOGY