UNSG-Report Human Security 2010
UNSG-Report Human Security 2010
UNSG-Report Human Security 2010
Original: English
Sixty-fourth session
Agenda items 48 and 114
Integrated and coordinated implementation of and follow-up
to the outcomes of the major United Nations conferences and
summits in the economic, social and related fields
Follow-up to the outcome of the Millennium Summit
Human security
Report of the Secretary-General
Summary
The present report is submitted pursuant to paragraph 143 of the 2005 World
Summit Outcome (General Assembly resolution 60/1), in which the Heads of State
and Government committed themselves to discuss and define the notion of human
security. The report provides an update on developments related to the advancement
of human security since the 2005 World Summit. It takes stock of discussions on
human security, its various definitions and its relationship to State sovereignty and
the responsibility to protect. The report also outlines the principles and the approach
for advancing human security and its application to the current priorities of the
United Nations. Key human security initiatives undertaken by Governments, regional
and subregional intergovernmental organizations, as well as the organizations and
bodies of the United Nations system, are presented as examples of the reach of this
important concept and its growing acceptance. The report concludes by identifying
the core elements and the added value of human security and provides a set of
recommendations as a follow-up to the above-mentioned commitment contained in
the World Summit Outcome.
Human security is based on a fundamental understanding that Governments
retain the primary role for ensuring the survival, livelihood and dignity of their
citizens. It is an invaluable tool for assisting Governments in identifying critical and
pervasive threats to the welfare of their people and the stability of their sovereignty.
It advances programmes and policies that counter and address emerging threats in a
manner that is contextually relevant and prioritized. This helps Governments and the
international community to better utilize their resources and to develop strategies
that strengthen the protection and empowerment framework needed for the assurance
of human security and the promotion of peace and stability at every level — local,
national, regional and international.
I. Introduction
1. The 2005 World Summit and the decision by the General Assembly to further
define the notion of human security have been critical in raising awareness and
interest in the concept of human security. In paragraph 143 of the 2005 World
Summit Outcome, the Heads of State and Government recognized that “all
individuals, in particular vulnerable people, are entitled to freedom from fear and
freedom from want, with an equal opportunity to enjoy all their rights and fully
develop their human potential”. To that end, States Members of the United Nations
have agreed to a further discussion of the notion of human security. Drawing input
from a number of Governments as well as intergovernmental organizations, civil
society groups, scholars and other eminent individuals, human security is gaining
wide support in the United Nations and other forums.
2. At the United Nations, notable contributions have been made in advancing the
human security concept. In October 2006, as a follow-up to the 2005 World Summit,
the first meeting of the Friends of Human Security was held in New York.
Established as an open-ended forum to promote a greater understanding of the
concept of human security and its application through collaborative efforts among
Member States, the Friends of Human Security has met seven times and has been
instrumental in further discussing the notion of human security. In the meantime, the
Human Security Network, established in May 1999, continues to play an
instrumental role in highlighting the added value of human security. By focusing on
common global challenges, including those pertaining to climate change,
pandemics, protection of children and women against violence, small arms and light
weapons, the Human Security Network draws special attention to instances of
human insecurity around the world.
3. Developments on human security at the global level are similarly reflected in
the agendas and policy debates among regional intergovernmental organizations
such as the African Union, the European Union, the Association of Southeast Asian
Nations (ASEAN), the Organization of American States (OAS) and the League of
Arab States (LAS). At the regional level, contemporary challenges — from volatile
food prices, climate change and the financial and economic crisis to armed conflicts,
human trafficking and transnational crime — highlight the need for comprehensive,
integrated and people-centred approaches.
4. Broadly defined, human security encompasses freedom from fear, freedom
from want and freedom to live in dignity. Together, these fundamental freedoms are
rooted in the core principles of the Charter of the United Nations. They are also
reflected in the many human security-related initiatives and activities undertaken by
United Nations agencies, funds and programmes and by intergovernmental
organizations as outlined in the compendium submitted to the General Assembly
(A/62/695, annex).
5. Since 1999, human security projects have been supported, inter alia, by the
Department of Economic and Social Affairs, the Office of the Special Adviser on
Africa, the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), the United Nations
Population Fund (UNFPA), the United Nations Human Settlements Programme
(UN-Habitat), the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees
(UNHCR), the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), the United Nations
Development Fund for Women (UNIFEM), the World Food Programme (WFP), the
2 10-26338
A/64/701
United Nations Mine Action System, the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime
(UNODC), the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), the
International Labour Organization (ILO), the United Nations Educational, Scientific
and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), the World Health Organization (WHO), the
United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), the International
Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the International Organization for Migration
(IOM), the United Nations Trust Fund for Human Security and the Policy
Development and Studies Branch in the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian
Affairs.
6. Human security projects have proven beneficial in addressing the
multidimensional impacts of threats to peoples and communities. Projects have
covered all regions and have aimed at rebuilding war-torn societies; preventing,
mitigating and responding to natural disasters; increasing harvests and strengthening
food security; improving access to health care and education in times of crises; and
mobilizing communities through participatory processes, local leadership and
integrated capacity-building measures.
7. In this regard, on 22 May 2008, the General Assembly held an informal
thematic debate on human security. During the course of deliberations, broad
consensus was reached by Member States on the need for a new culture of
international relations that goes beyond fragmented responses and calls for
comprehensive, integrated and people-centred approaches.
8. In line with recent developments to further explore the implementation of the
goals set out in paragraph 143 of the World Summit Outcome, the present report:
considers the current global conditions under which the human security of
individuals and communities is critically and pervasively threatened; takes stock of
discussions on human security, its various definitions and its relation to State
sovereignty and the responsibility to protect; outlines the principles and the
approach for advancing human security and its application to the current priorities
of the United Nations; presents examples of human security initiatives carried out
by Governments, regional and subregional intergovernmental organizations, as well
as the United Nations system; and concludes by defining the core elements and
draws attention to the added value of the human security concept. In addition, a set
of recommendations is provided as a follow-up to paragraph 143 of the World
Summit Outcome.
10-26338 3
A/64/701
4 10-26338
A/64/701
15. Since that time, various definitions have been presented. For example, in 1999,
a group of like-minded States from different regions of the world, including Austria,
Canada, Chile, Costa Rica, Greece, Ireland, Jordan, Mali, Norway, Slovenia,
Switzerland, Thailand and South Africa, which participates as an observer,
established the Human Security Network. The Network defined human security as
“A humane world … where every individual would be guaranteed freedom from fear
and freedom from want, with an equal opportunity to fully develop their human
potential ... In essence, human security means freedom from pervasive threats to
people’s rights, their safety or even their lives ... Human security and human
development are thus two sides of the same coin, mutually reinforcing and leading
to a conducive environment for each other”.
16. In 2001, the independent Commission on Human Security, led by Sadako
Ogata and Amartya Sen, set out to forge a new consensus on security threats facing
contemporary societies in the twenty-first century. Recognizing that these
challenges have grown more complex, the Commission, in its 2003 report entitled
Human Security Now: Protecting and Empowering People, defined human security
as “to protect the vital core of all human lives in ways that enhance human freedoms
and human fulfilment. Human security means protecting fundamental freedoms —
freedoms that are the essence of life. It means protecting people from critical
(severe) and pervasive (widespread) threats and situations. It means using processes
that build on people’s strengths and aspirations. It means creating political, social,
environmental, economic, military and cultural systems that together give people the
building blocks of survival livelihood and dignity.” The definition provided by the
Commission on Human Security has also been adopted as the working definition of
human security by the Friends of Human Security at its meetings.
17. Also in 2003, OAS highlighted the importance of human security in its
Declaration on Security in the Americas. Noting the profound changes that have
occurred in the world and in the Americas since 1945, OAS Member States
reaffirmed “that the basis and purpose of security is the protection of human beings.
Security is strengthened when we deepen its human dimension. Conditions for
human security are improved through full respect for people’s dignity, human rights,
and fundamental freedoms, as well as the promotion of social and economic
development, social inclusion, and education and the fight against poverty, disease
and hunger”. Furthermore, “The security threats, concerns, and other challenges in
the hemispheric context are of diverse nature and multidimensional scope, and the
traditional concept and approach must be expanded to encompass new and
non-traditional threats, which include political, economic, social, health and
environmental aspects”.
18. More recently, the African Union, in its Non-Aggression and Common
Defence Pact, has incorporated human security in its “vision of a united and strong
Africa, based on respect for the principles of coexistence, non-aggression,
non-interference in the internal affairs of Member States, mutual respect for
individual sovereignty and territorial integrity of each State”. To that end, it has
defined human security as “the security of the individual in terms of satisfaction of
his/her basic needs. It also includes the creation of social, economic, political,
environmental and cultural conditions necessary for the survival and dignity of the
individual, the protection of and respect for human rights, good governance and the
guarantee for each individual of opportunities and choices for his/her full
development”.
10-26338 5
A/64/701
19. Common to all the above definitions are three essential components that
encompass the principles of human security and help further explore the added
value of the concept. First, human security is in response to current and emerging
threats — threats that are multiple, complex and interrelated and can acquire
transnational dimensions. Second, human security calls for an expanded
understanding of security where the protection and empowerment of people form
the basis and the purpose of security. Third, human security does not entail the use
of force against the sovereignty of States and aims to integrate the goals of freedom
from fear, freedom from want and freedom to live in dignity through people-centred,
comprehensive, context-specific and preventive strategies.
20. The advancement of human security requires strong and stable institutions.
Among these, Governments retain the primary role in providing a rules-based
system where societal relations are mutually supportive, harmonious and
accountable. In cases where Government institutions are weak or under threat, the
human security concept advocates addressing the root causes of these weaknesses
and helps develop timely, targeted and effective responses that improve the
resilience of Governments and people alike. Such an approach not only helps to
reduce human insecurities but ultimately strengthens Government and local
capacities and contributes to greater national security.
21. Moreover, in emphasizing the instrumental role of Governments and people in
ensuring peace and stability, the Charter also gives equal weight to the sovereignty
of States as well as to the livelihood and dignity of people everywhere. As
articulated in the preamble and in Articles 1 and 2 of the Charter, the international
community cannot have peace and security unless the rights of individuals and their
fundamental freedoms are supported. In this context, human security, by addressing
the varied aspects of insecurity and by focusing on the respective roles of
individuals, communities and Governments, provides the analytical framework for
the creation of genuine possibilities for partnership between Governments and
citizens. As a result, the application of human security is expected to reinforce the
stability and security of both, as well as that of the international community.
22. The indivisibility of security, development and human rights is also well
articulated in the Charter and is in line with the central challenges facing
Governments and people alike. Here too the human security concept seeks to
enhance the sovereignty of States by focusing on the multidimensional aspects of
human and therefore national insecurities. Improved capacities of Governments and
their institutions to provide early warning, identify root causes and address policy
gaps in order to tackle persistent and emerging challenges are key components in
advancing human security and maintaining a viable framework for promoting peace
and stability.
23. As agreed in paragraph 143 of the World Summit Outcome, the purpose of
human security is to enable all individuals to be free from fear and want, and to
enjoy all their rights and fully develop their human potential. The use of force is not
6 10-26338
A/64/701
envisaged in the application of the human security concept. The focus of human
security is on fostering Government and local capacities and strengthening the
resilience of both to emerging challenges in ways that are mutually reinforcing,
preventive and comprehensive.
24. Meanwhile, the responsibility to protect, as agreed upon by Member States in
paragraphs 138 to 140 of the World Summit Outcome, focuses on protecting
populations from specific cases of genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleaning and crimes
against humanity. As noted in the Secretary-General’s report on implementing the
responsibility to protect (A/63/677), the international community, guided by the
principles of the Charter, must do its part to prevent and limit the escalation of these
cases. Such cases result in large and complex humanitarian crises that are costly in
terms of human lives, loss of social capital and financial resources, and are more
difficult to resolve later.
10-26338 7
A/64/701
8 10-26338
A/64/701
world. As I outlined in my report on the world financial and economic crisis and its
impact on development (A/CONF.214/4), the reduction in employment and income
opportunities, lower trade in goods and services and the dramatic drop in
remittances have resulted in further setbacks in our efforts towards poverty
reduction. Previous financial and economic crises have shown that poor countries
are highly susceptible to the ramifications of these crises. Rising unemployment and
increasing poverty confront these countries precisely at a time when diminishing
resources limit their ability to mitigate the negative impacts of these crises.
33. Moreover, the current global financial and economic crisis extends beyond an
increase in economic insecurity. In the absence of appropriate counter-cyclical
macroeconomic policy measures and supportive social protection systems, the crisis
has had negative consequences in terms of additional food, health and
environmental insecurities. The FAO projects that, as a result of the crisis, the
number of hungry and undernourished people worldwide will increase to an historic
high of over one billion people. In addition, changes in land use and accelerated
deforestation may increase the risk of environmental degradation, adding further
urgency to the challenges being faced by the international community as a result of
the crisis.
34. The combined impact of these insecurities may also threaten our progress
towards achieving the Millennium Development Goals by 2015. Today, with a
number of donor economies in recession and many developing countries unable to
mobilize the required resources, a diminished amount of funding for the Goals
would not only slow global progress towards meeting them but could also reverse
recent hard-won development gains in some developing countries.
2. Current responses
35. In recognizing the multidimensional effects of the global financial and
economic crisis, international and national responses must be guided by the need to:
(a) address the human and ecological costs of the crisis; and (b) strengthen the
global partnership to accelerate progress towards achieving the Millennium
Development Goals. With the impact of these challenges intertwined, inadequate
coordination among Governments will have wider security repercussions in terms of
economic unilateralism and increased tensions among countries.
36. It is therefore heartening that Member States, multilateral institutions and
regional bodies have mobilized to respond to the crisis collectively from a
comprehensive and people-centred perspective. As a result, leaders at numerous
summits have agreed to undertake actions that help address the human and social
impacts of the crisis. Such responses strengthen human security since they
emphasize both mitigation measures that address immediate needs as well as
protection and empowerment strategies that strengthen the resilience of
Governments and individuals, making it easier for them to cope with current and
future crises. For example, in the most vulnerable countries where the impact of the
global financial and economic crisis has placed a higher threat on the survival and
livelihoods of poor communities, donors from the States Members of the
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), as well as
international organizations such as the World Bank, have agreed to provide both
short-term liquidity and long-term development financing in order to support the
efforts of national Governments to respond swiftly to the needs of those most
severely affected by the crisis.
10-26338 9
A/64/701
37. In the meantime, while the Millennium Development Goals have suffered
some setbacks as a result of the global financial and economic crisis, the story is not
all bleak. Progress has been made in many developing countries. The challenge now
is to bridge the existing implementation gaps and to extend the reach of the Goals to
the most vulnerable communities within countries. All too often, there are areas and
groups that have been left behind, including rural communities, internally displaced
persons, migrants, ethnic minorities, and the poorest households. In a world facing
multiple crises, poverty-fighting commitments are more important than ever in
ensuring human and global security.
2. Current responses
39. As articulated in the Comprehensive Framework for Action of the High-level
Task Force on the Global Food Security Crisis, established in April 2008, a
collective commitment to shielding people from downside risks in an enduring and
empowering manner is central to improving food and nutritional security. In this
regard, the international community and Governments must continue not only to
address the root causes of food insecurity, whether due to internal or external
factors, endemic or cyclical conditions, but also to support community resilience
through people-centred responses that foster sustainable agricultural practices;
promote income opportunities; improve market access and food distribution
networks; and strengthen early warning and social protection systems.
40. Moreover, while some of the economic and structural factors related to food
insecurity are common to most countries, the results, impacts and specific root
causes of food insecurity vary significantly across and within countries. By focusing
on the particular characteristics and conditions of food insecurity in a given country,
the human security concept can help develop targeted, sustainable and preventive
responses that are grounded in local realities. In addition, the human security
framework helps to identify the different ways in which food insecurity can increase
vulnerabilities in other areas such as health and the environment. If neglected, the
10 10-26338
A/64/701
convergence of these vulnerabilities can have dire effects on the welfare of millions
of people.
41. The latest influenza A (H1N1) pandemic has been a stark reminder of the
human and economic costs of health-related emergencies. Poor health, whether
caused by global pandemics or due to inadequate health-care systems and other
causes, poses significant threats to people everywhere. Today, it is increasingly clear
that the health of one community has serious implications for that of other
communities and, in some instances, between countries.
42. Poor health also weakens progress towards the achievement of the Millennium
Development Goals. For example, across sub-Saharan Africa, controlling
onchocerciasis, river blindness, which costs less than $1 per person, can deliver an
estimated $3.7 billion in productivity; and polio eradication could save
Governments $1.5 billion in vaccines, treatment and rehabilitation costs. Yet in
many developing countries, basic lifesaving treatments are still not available to
large segments of the population, leading to significant levels of lost productivity
and unacceptable rates of preventable death.
2. Current responses
43. The global response to the H1N1 influenza is an example of multilateralism at
its best. It has demonstrated what is possible when the international community
makes a strong commitment to fighting a specific human security challenge. By
placing vulnerable communities and countries at the centre of the planning process,
policymakers and development practitioners are better able to understand the
specific gaps and vulnerabilities in a given situation and, as a result, can more
appropriately target their responses to where it matters the most.
44. Past efforts have also demonstrated that success depends on implementing
comprehensive protection and empowerment strategies. Protection measures aim at
preventing, monitoring and anticipating health-related threats. They entail
developing early warning and response mechanisms as well as strengthening
preparedness to identify, validate and control health-related challenges. Meanwhile,
empowerment measures rely on improving health-care systems, educating and
mobilizing the public, and developing local-level health insurance schemes.
Together such a comprehensive framework improves preparedness for current and
emerging health-related challenges as well as progress in the provision of
affordable, functioning and accessible health care, both of which are instrumental to
long-term prosperity and development.
10-26338 11
A/64/701
2. Current responses
47. To date, Governments and their international partners have reached a common
understanding on the need to place climate change in the broader context of
sustainable development and poverty eradication. In particular, there is broad
consensus on the importance of mainstreaming disaster reduction and risk
management into national development plans, promoting community-based
adaptation and mitigation plans, and accelerating the transfer and deployment of
information, knowledge and technologies, especially to those countries most
vulnerable to climate change.
48. Meanwhile, where climate change threatens to exacerbate socio-economic
conditions, a better understanding of the interlinkages between climate change and
other dimensions of human security is needed. Such an understanding can help
assess the causes and identify the actions needed to manage the combined risks of
climate-related insecurities. In these fragile spots, special attention from the
international community is required to assist countries in reducing the social
stresses that emerge when State institutions are overstretched and the delivery of
basic services is inadequate.
12 10-26338
A/64/701
2. Current responses
51. In recent years, responses to conflict prevention have increasingly focused on
tackling the root causes of conflicts. This awareness has resulted in the integration
of conflict prevention strategies into national development and poverty reduction
plans. The international community has also learned that protection and
empowerment measures are not only strategies to be adopted during and after
conflicts but are also important conflict prevention mechanisms. As a result,
protection efforts have targeted the most vulnerable groups, including women,
children and the displaced, and have placed increasing emphasis on supporting the
capacities of national authorities to, inter alia, provide public safety, deliver
essential basic services and strengthen the rule of law. Since conflicts erode trust
among communities, protection strategies are most effective when they are
complemented with empowerment measures that promote partnerships with local
and national stakeholders. Local partners can play a significant role in reinforcing
national ownership in the country’s future, nurturing reconciliation and coexistence
and restoring trust in the institutions that return stability to post-conflict situations.
52. Conflict prevention also requires integrated and multisectoral strategies that
cover all aspects of recovery. Such an integrated approach advances targeted
responses that capitalize on the expertise and the potential complementarities
between political, military, humanitarian and developmental actors, thus avoiding
duplication across sectors and strengthening the prospect for recovery in post-
conflict settings. At the United Nations, a key mechanism to ensure the coherence of
all activities of the Organization in post-conflict situations has been the
Peacebuilding Commission. Through its unique membership and working
modalities, the Commission has promoted peacebuilding activities in Burundi, the
Central African Republic, Guinea-Bissau and Sierra Leone. It is my hope that as the
Commission approaches its five-year review later in 2010, the principles and goals
of human security will be further reflected in its activities.
10-26338 13
A/64/701
A. National initiatives
54. Over the past two decades, Governments have made significant efforts to place
human security in their national and foreign policies. In addition to efforts made by
members of the Friends of Human Security and the Human Security Network,
concerns for human security are also of interest to countries like Mongolia, Ecuador
and Thailand.
55. In 2000, human security became a priority area for the Government of
Mongolia, which is currently implementing an initiative under its Good Governance
for Human Security programme. Moreover, as the host of the Fifth International
Conference of New or Restored Democracies in 2003, Mongolia reinforced its
commitment to incorporating the fundamental principles of human security into its
domestic policies and ratified the Ulaanbaatar Declaration on Democracy, Good
Governance and Civil Society.
56. In 2008, Ecuador adopted human security in its constitution, paving the way
for a more people-centred response to some of the country’s most urgent and critical
threats. Focusing on the link between peace and development, the Government of
Ecuador aims to build sustainable peace on the basis of development, social justice,
equality and dignity.
57. Another contributor to the growing movement to promote human security is
the Government of Thailand. Thailand is the first country to establish a ministry
dedicated to human security. Among its many activities, the Ministry of Social
Development and Human Security works to advance “freedom from want” and
“freedom to live in dignity” from a people-centred perspective, actively utilizing
and promoting strengthened multisectoral collaboration among national
organizations dedicated to the promotion of human security.
14 10-26338
A/64/701
comprehensive human development. Since that time, human security has gained
additional ground among ASEAN member States, as was reflected in the 2009 joint
declaration of ASEAN Defence Ministers, which highlighted the importance of
non-traditional threats to security and the role of ASEAN in advancing integrated
responses to such challenges. Similarly, the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation
forum (APEC) has also recognized the importance of human security to sustainable
growth and prosperity. As a result, since the eleventh APEC Economic Leaders’
Meeting in Bangkok in 2003, leaders have asserted the need to enhance human
security by acknowledging that vulnerability to natural disasters, international
terrorism, pandemics and cross-border drug trade impose high economic costs that
threaten human security in the subregion.
61. Also noteworthy is the Declaration on Security in the Americas, adopted in
October 2003 by OAS. The Declaration acknowledges that the conditions for human
security are dependent upon respect for people’s dignity, human rights and
fundamental freedoms.
10-26338 15
A/64/701
65. Over the past 10 years, the United Nations Trust Fund for Human Security has
played a critical role in channelling financial resources to field-based projects on the
application of the human security concept in the United Nations system. As at
December 2009, the Trust Fund had allocated approximately $323 million to 187
projects in over 60 countries. These projects address multisectoral issues and give
priority to regions where insecurities are most critical and pervasive. Since 1999,
projects in Africa have received the highest percentage of funding, at 32.3 per cent,
with Eastern Europe and Central Asia receiving 29 per cent, Asia and the Pacific
23.3 per cent, Latin America and the Caribbean 7.7 per cent, the Middle East and
Arab States 2.9 per cent, and global projects receiving 4.8 per cent. The following
are some examples of the projects supported by the Trust Fund.
66. In the Ituri region of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, the Trust Fund is
supporting a project that combines the efforts of UNDP, FAO, UNICEF, UNHCR,
WFP, the United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the
Congo (MONUC), UNFPA and WHO, along with local, national and international
non-governmental organizations, as well as the provincial government. Placing
communities at the centre of post-conflict recovery, the project addresses the full
range of insecurities faced by people of the district. In particular, the project aims to
strengthen public safety; improve health and education; support economic recovery
and promote a culture of peaceful coexistence between diverse groups. The
combined impact of these efforts provides significant opportunities to decrease
inequalities, strengthen social networks and improve State-society relations, all of
which are required to produce the peace dividend needed to bolster confidence in
consolidating peace and transitioning to sustainable development.
67. For generations, poppy production has been the main source of income for
large segments of inhabitants in the highlands of Shan State in Myanmar. While
recent efforts on opium eradication have produced considerable progress, however,
in the absence of alternative income opportunities for former poppy farmers,
incomes have declined in the affected communities. This has triggered concerns
over the possible resumption of tensions between competing ethnic groups in the
area. With funding from the United Nations Trust Fund for Human Security, several
United Nations organizations (WFP, FAO, UNODC and UNFPA), in partnership
with local and international non-governmental organizations, are working together
to enhance the requisite health, education, nutrition, infrastructure and capacity-
building needs of former poppy farmers and poor vulnerable families in the region.
By improving livelihoods and strengthening food security, the project provides
tangible alternatives to communities facing difficulties in freeing themselves from
their dependency on poppy production and enhances the conditions for the
eradication of poppy production in Myanmar.
68. The areas of Belarus, the Russian Federation and Ukraine that were affected
by the Chernobyl nuclear accident, in addition to those around the former nuclear
test site of Semipalatinsk in Kazakhstan, are facing challenges related to fears of
16 10-26338
A/64/701
VIII. Recommendations
70. The broad understanding of human security, as contained in paragraph 143 of
the World Summit Outcome and further defined in the present report, is at the centre
of the work of the United Nations. With a mandate to address security, development
and human rights, the United Nations system is instrumental in addressing human
security issues. The application of the human security concept does not bring
additional layers to the work of the United Nations, but rather complements and
focuses the activities of the Organization in these areas.
71. At the Secretariat, the United Nations Trust Fund for Human Security has
played an important role in addressing human security challenges. In addition to the
valuable support provided by the Governments of Greece, Japan, Slovenia and
Thailand, I strongly urge other Member States to contribute to the valuable work of
the Trust Fund.
72. The General Assembly is therefore requested:
(a) To consider the present report;
(b) To take into account the added value of the human security concept as
outlined herein and to discuss how best to mainstream human security in United
Nations activities;
10-26338 17
A/64/701
18 10-26338