1 s2.0 S0308814618300839 Main
1 s2.0 S0308814618300839 Main
Food Chemistry
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/foodchem
A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T
Keywords: The antioxidant activity and genotoxicity of isogarcinol were assessed by several in vitro tests. Its IC50 values for
Isogarcinol DPPH% and ABTS% were 36.3 ± 3.35 µM and 16.6 ± 3.98 µM, respectively, which were all lower than those of
Antioxidant activity VC and BHT. Isogarcinol had no cyctotoxic or promotional activities at 1–10 µM in the CCK-8 assay, and neg-
Cytotoxicity ligible genotoxic effects at 50–500 µM on HepG2 cells by the single-cell gel electrophoresis assay. Pre-incubation
Genotoxicity
of the cells with 0.5–1.5 µM isogarcinol, before exposure to H2O2, significantly increased cell viability in a
HepG2 cells
concentration-dependent manner. Isogarcinol also reduced intercellular reactive oxygen species accumulation,
Oxidative stress
lactate dehydrogenase release and malondialdehyde levels, and increased superoxide dismutase activity and
glutathione levels. Western-blot analysis revealed that it up-regulated pro-caspase-3 and reduced cleaved cas-
pase-3 during H2O2-induced oxidative stress. All the above results indicate that isogarcinol promises to be useful
as a natural antioxidant.
⁎
Corresponding authors.
E-mail addresses: cenjr@hainu.edu.cn (J. Cen), yanfengxb@hainu.edu.cn (X. Yang).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.01.074
Received 9 August 2017; Received in revised form 7 December 2017; Accepted 9 January 2018
Available online 12 January 2018
0308-8146/ © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Z. Liu et al. Food Chemistry 253 (2018) 5–12
2.1. Materials ABTS % −scavenging activity (%) = [(A blank-A sample)/A blank] ×100 %
Isogarcinol (Iso) with a purity of 95.55% was extracted and purified where Ablank is the absorbance of the control reaction (containing all
by our research team (Cen et al., 2013). DPPH was purchased from reagents except the test compound), and Asample was the absorbance of
Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO USA), ABTS and butylated hydro- the test compound.
xytoluene (BHT) were from Tokyo Chemical Industry (TCL) Develop-
ment Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China) and lecithin from Shanghai Macklin
Biochemical Co. Ltd. (China). Fetal bovine serum (FBS) was from 2.4. Determination of reducing power
Zhejiang Tianhang Biotechnology Co. Ltd. (China) and the Cell
Counting kit-8 was bought from BBI Life Sciences Corporation The reducing power of samples was measured by a modification of
(Shanghai, China). Vitamin C (VC) and vitamin E (VE) were purchased the method of Roy et al. (2011) 1.0 mL aliquots of solutions containing
from Beijing solarbio science & technology Co. Ltd. (Beijing, China). various concentrations of the samples (50–350 µM) were mixed in a
Glatathione (GSH), superoxide dismutase (SOD), lactate dehydrogenase tube with 2.5 mL of 0.2 mM phosphate buffer (PBS, pH 6.6) and po-
(LDH) and the protein detection kits were obtained from Nanjing tassium ferricyanide (K3Fe(CN)6, 1%). The mixtures were incubated at
Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute (Nanjing, China). Caspase-3 (human 50 °C for 30 min. After addition of 2.5 mL of 10% trichloroacetic acid,
specific) monoclonal antibody was bought from Proteintech Group Inc. each mixture was centrifuged at 3000 r/min for 20 min. The upper layer
(Wuhan, China); dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), minimum essential of solution (2.5 mL) was collected and mixed with 2.5 mL of deionized
medium (MEM), polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes, β-actin water containing 0.5 mL of 0.1% ferric chloride. The absorbance was
antibody, HRP goat anti-mouse IgG and 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein dia- read at 700 nm in a UV-2100 spectrophotometer against a blank
cetate (DCFH-DA) kit were purchased from Boster Biological Tech- sample. Higher absorbance indicated greater reducing power.
nology Co. Ltd. (Wuhan, China). Other chemical reagents were pur-
chased from the Guangzhou chemical reagent factory (Guangzhou,
China). The benchtop system (SW-CJ-2FD) was purchased from Suzhou 2.5. Anti-lipid peroxidation activity
Antai Airtech Co. Ltd. (Suzhou, China). The HF90 CO2 incubator was
purchased from Heal Force Bio-Meditech Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Anti-lipid peroxidation activity was measured as described, with
The micro-plate reader XMARK and ultraviolet and visible spectro- minor modifications (Zheng et al., 2015). 1 mL aliquots of a 10 mg/mL
photometer 2100 were purchased from BIORAD Ltd. (Japan) and lecithin solution, 0.4 mM FeSO4 and sample were mixed and incubated
Shanghai Unico Spectrotech Instruments Co., Ltd. (China), respectively. for 60 min at 37 °C. The mixed liquor was heated for 15 min at 95 °C
after adding 2 mL of TCA-TBA-HCl. The tubes were centrifuged at
2.2. DPPH radical-scavenging activity 3000 r/min for 10 min and the absorbance of the upper layer was read
at 535 nm in a UV-2100 spectrophotometer. Data for each assay was
DPPH%-scavenging capacity was measured according to Zhou et al. recorded in triplicate. VC and BHT were used as positive controls.
(2013) Briefly, different concentrations of samples to be tested (0.1 mL)
were added to 0.39 mL of ethanolic DPPH (60 µM). The reaction mix- Inhibition rate(%) = [(A blank−A sample)/A blank] × 100%
tures were shaken vigorously and left at indoor temperature for 30 min,
avoiding light. Absorbance was determined at 517 nm in a UV-2100 where Ablank was the absorbance of the control reaction (replacing the
spectrophotometer. All determinations were performed in triplicate. sample with distilled water), and Asample was the absorbance of the test
The percentage reduction of DPPH radical was calculated as: compound.
6
Z. Liu et al. Food Chemistry 253 (2018) 5–12
The human hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG2) cell line was pro- 2.11. Measurement of intracellular ROS
vided by the Type Culture Collection of the Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Shanghai, China. Cells were cultured in MEM with 10% fetal Intracellular ROS were monitored using the DCFH-DA fluorescence
bovine serum, penicillin (100 units/mL), and streptomycin (100 µg/mL) probe assay (Liu et al., 2014). HepG2 cells were seeded on 12-well
at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. plates at 1 × 105 cells/well and incubated at 37° C in 5% CO2 for 24 h.
The cells were pretreated with 0.5, 1 or 1.5 µM concentrations of iso-
2.7. Determination of cytotoxicity garcinol (final concentration) for 30 min before exposure to 500 µM
H2O2 for a further 3 h. Then DCFH-DA was added to the culture plates
Cytotoxicity was tested, using the tetrazolium salt-based CCK-8 at a final concentration of 10 µM and incubation continued for 30 min.
assay. Stock solutions of isogarcinol and BHT were made in di- The cells were washed three times in serum-free medium, and sus-
methylsulfoxide (DMSO) and diluted in MEM before use. Cells were pended in PBS. Fluorescence intensity was immediately measured with
seeded in 96-well plates at 5 × 104 cells/mL in 100 µL of complete a multi-mode microplate reader at an excitation wavelength of 488 nm
medium and various concentrations of isogarcinol or BHT were added. and emission wavelength of 525 nm.
The final concentrations of isogarcinol were 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, 13, 15 µM.
The highest content of DMSO was 0.2%. After 24 h of incubation, 10 µL 2.12. Determination of LDH release, MDA level, GSH level and SOD activity
of CCK-8 reagent was added to the wells and incubation continued for
1 h. Cytotoxicity was measured as described in the CCK-8 kit. Each HepG2 cells in 6-well plates (3 × 105 cells/well) were cultured and
experiment was repeated five times. treated according to the procedures described above. LDH release, MDA
level, GSH level, SOD activity and protein content were measured,
2.8. SCGE assay using appropriate assay kits (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering
Institute (Nanjing, China).
The single cell gel electrophoresis (SCGE) assay, also referred to as
the comet assay, was performed as described by Zhang, Jia, Hao, Cen, 2.13. Western blotting analysis
and Li (2011) with slight modifications. After exposure to isogarcinol or
BHT, 100 µL of each cell suspension was mixed with 100 µL of 1% low- Western blotting analysis was carried out as described by Liu et al.
melting-point agarose (LMA, prepared in phosphate buffer) placed on (2014) with slight modifications. HepG2 cells were cultured in 6-well
frosted glass microscope slides pre-coated with 100 µL of solidified plates (3 × 105 cells/well) and treated as described above. Afterwards,
normal-melting-point agarose (NMA, 1% in PBS). The slides were the cells were washed twice with PBS (0.1 M, pH 7.4, 4 °C), centrifuged
placed on ice for 5 min and freshly prepared cold lysis solution (10 mM at 2000 rpm for 5 min and lysed by incubation in 20 µL RIPA buffer for
Tris, 0.1 M EDTA, 2.5 M NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, and 10% DMSO, pH 15 min on ice. Lysates were centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 10 min at
10.0) added and incubated at 4 °C for 1 h. Then the slides were placed in 4 °C, and supernatant protein concentrations were determined with the
freshly prepared electrophoresis buffer (1 mM Na2EDTA and 300 mM BCA assay.
NaOH, pH > 13) for 15 min to allow the DNA to denature and to re- Equal amounts of protein were fractionated by 12% sodium dodecyl
solve alkali-labile sites. They were then electrophoresed at 0.75 V cm−1 sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and transferred
(26 V, 300 mA) at 4 °C for 15 min, washed three times in 0.4 M Tris onto polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes, which were in-
buffer (pH 7.5) at 4 °C for 10 min each time and dehydrated by im- cubated with 5% skimmed milk in TBST buffer for 2 h at room tem-
mersion in cold absolute ethanol for 10 min. They were then dried at perature in a bio-shaker. Then the membranes were incubated with
room temperature, stained with 70 µL of 20 mg/mL ethidium bromide primary antibody (monoclonal anti-caspase-3 (1:1000) and anti-β-actin
solution for 30 min and analyzed at 400× magnification with a fluor- (1:1000)) overnight at 4 °C. After three washes with TBST buffer, for
escence microscope (BX51-32P01, Olympus, Japan), equipped with an 5 min each, the membranes were incubated with appropriate secondary
excitation filter of BP 546/10 nm and a barrier filter of 590 nm. antibody (1:10,000) for 1 h at room temperature and again washed
three times in TBST buffer. Bands were visualized with an ECL system
2.9. The oxidative stress model of HepG2 cells and band densities were optically scanned with ImageJ software.
Cells in logarithmic growth were transferred to 96-well plates at a 2.14. Statistical analysis
density of 5 × 104 cells/ml in 100 µL and cultured for 24 h. Then, the
medium was replaced with fresh medium containing various final All experiments were performed in triplicate and data were re-
concentrations (200, 300, 400, 500, 600 and 700 µM) of H2O2 for 3 h. corded as means ± standard error (SD). One way ANOVA was used to
10 µL of CCK-8 reagent were added to the wells and they were in- assess differences between the means using SAS 9.1 software. Student’s
cubated for 1 h. Absorption was measured at 450 nm with a micro-plate t-test was used for paired samples, and differences were deemed sig-
reader, as described in the CCK-8 kit. nificant at p < 0.01 (∗∗, ##), and p < 0.05 (∗, #).
The CCK-8 method was used to determine the viability of HepG2 3.1. Antioxidant activity of isogarcinol in vitro
cells, as described above. Cells were seeded in 96-well plates
(5 × 104 cells/mL, 100 µL) and incubated at 37 °C in 5% CO2 for 24 h. The DPPH and ABTS radical-scavenging capacities, ferric reducing
They were pretreated with various concentrations of isogarcinol (final antioxidative potentials and anti-lipid peroxidation activities of iso-
concentrations of 0.5, 1, 1.5 µM) and cultured for 30 min. The control garcinol, VC and BHT were examined in a series of antioxidant ex-
was treated with 0.2% (v/v) DMSO under the same conditions. periments, as described in Materials and Methods. The results are
Thereafter 500 µM H2O2 was added to the mixtures and they were in- shown in Fig. 1 and Table 1. Isogarcinol displayed higher antioxidant
cubated for 3 h. The isogarcinol was not removed after the addition of activity than did VC and BHT in both the DPPH and the ABTS assays
H2O2. Finally, 10 µL of CCK-8 reagent were added to the wells and (Fig. 1A and B). The antioxidant activity is proportional to the con-
incubation continued for 1 h. The cell viability was expressed as a centration of isogarcinol; the IC50 of isogarcinol was 36.3 ± 3.35 µM,
7
Z. Liu et al. Food Chemistry 253 (2018) 5–12
Fig. 1. Antioxidant activities of isogarcinol: (A) DPPH radical-scavenging activity; (B) ABTS radical-scavenging capacity; (C) Reducing power; (D) Anti-lipid peroxidation activity. All
values are expressed as means ± SD, n = 3.
8
Z. Liu et al. Food Chemistry 253 (2018) 5–12
Fig. 2. Effect of isogarcinol on HepG2 cells. (A) Cytotoxicity of isogarcinol on HepG2 cells. Cells were treated with the indicated concentrations of isogarcinol (1–15 µM), and the control
cells received 0.2% DMSO (v/v). Cell viability was determined by the CCK-8 assay after 24 h, Values are means ± SD. (B) Effect of H2O2 on HepG2 cell viability. Cells were exposed to
H2O2 at concentrations from 200 to 700 µM for 3 h, and viability was measured by the CCK-8 assay. (C) The protective effect of isogarcinol on H2O2-induced oxidative damage. (D) Effect
of isogarcinol on HepG2 intracellular ROS. Cells were pretreated with 0.5–1.5 µM isogarcinol or 1.5 µM VE for 30 min and then exposed to 500 µM H2O2 for 3 h. The control group was
incubated with 0.2% DMSO (v/v). Data represent means ± SD of three independent experiments (n = 3). **p < 0.01 versus H2O2-treated cells, ##p < 0.01 versus the control group.
Fig. 3. DNA damage induced by isogarcinol in HepG2 cells. The cells were treated with Treatment with H2O2 (500 µM) significantly reduced the level of
different concentrations of isogarcinol and BHT for 3 h. (A) Control; (B-D) isogarcinol: pro-caspase-3 and increased that of caspase-3, and pretreatment with
50 µM, 100 µM, 500 µM; (E-G) BHT: 50 µM; 100 µM; 500 µM. (B-G) shows typical comet 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 µM isogarcinol dose-dependently opposed these effects
migration induced by BHT (magnification 400×).
(Fig. 5A and B).
9
Z. Liu et al. Food Chemistry 253 (2018) 5–12
Fig. 4. Effects of isogarcinol on LDH release (A), MDA level (B), GSH levels (C) and SOD activity (D) in HepG2 cells. Cells were pretreated with 0.5–1.5 µM isogarcinol or 1.5 µM VE for
30 min and then exposed to 500 µM H2O2 for 3 h. The control group was incubated with 0.2% DMSO (v/v). Data represent means ± SD of three independent experiments (n = 3).
*
P < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 versus H2O2-treated cells, #p < 0.05 and ##p < 0.01 versus control group.
therapy is regarded as a promising strategy to protect cells from oxi- activity (Fig. 1), which furthermore confirmed the results of Stark et al.
dative damage and natural products of plant origin are also important (2015). In particular, the IC50 of isogarcinol in the DPPH assay was
sources of antioxidants (Miremadi, Ayyash, Sherkat, & Stojanovska, almost 2-fold and 3-fold lower than those of VC and BHT, respectively
2014). Isogarcinol is a benzophenone with a variety of biological (Table 1). Ito et al. (2003) also found that the DPPH radical-scavenging
properties, such as antioxidant, antimicrobial, antifungal, anti-in- activity of isogarcinol (IC50 = 13.3 ± 1.3 µM) was about 2-fold lower
flammatory, and anti-HIV activities (Baggett, Mazzola, & Kennelly, than that of VE (IC50 = 22.8 ± 0.2 µM). The reducing power and anti-
2005). It also has antiplasmodial activity against P. Falciparum (Marti lipid peroxidation assays revealed that isogarcinol had antioxidant ac-
et al., 2010), acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase inhibitory tivity, but the results of both assays were lower than those obtained for
activities, antiprotozoal activity against Leishmania donovani (Lenta VC. A different chemical reaction mechanism, leading to a different
et al., 2007) and antibacterial activities (Deachathai, Mahabusarakam, ranking order of antioxidant activity for isogarcinol, BHT and VC, in
Phongpaichit, & Taylor, 2005). In the present work, we confirmed the this context, could provide an explanation for the obtained results. In
radical-scavenging activity, reducing power and anti-lipid peroxidation addition, we observed, in FRAP experiments, that isogarcinol possesses
capacity of isogarcinol, and showed that it has significant antioxidant some reducing power (data not shown). Hence, our results confirmed
Fig. 5. Effect of isogarcinol on the expression of caspase-3 levels in HepG2 cells. Cells were pretreated with 0.5–1.5 µM isogarcinol or 1.5 µM VE for 30 min and then exposed to 500 µM
H2O2 for 3 h. The control group was incubated with 0.2% DMSO (v/v). (A) The expressions of pro-caspase-3, cleaved caspase-3 and β-actin were used for normalization and verification of
protein loading; (B) Quantitative pro-caspase-3 and cleaved caspase-3 expression after normalization to β-actin. Data represent means ± SD of three independent experiments (n = 3).
**
p < 0.01 versus H2O2-treated cells, ##p < 0.01 versus control group.
10
Z. Liu et al. Food Chemistry 253 (2018) 5–12
11
Z. Liu et al. Food Chemistry 253 (2018) 5–12
induced Oxidative Stress in Human Embryonic Kidney 293 Cells. Food & Function, 5, Stark, T. D., Salger, M., & Frank, O. (2015). Antioxidative compounds from Garcinia
3179–3188. buchananii stem bark. Journal of Natural Products, 78(2), 234–240.
Liu, Z. J., Jiang, Y. Y., Zhang, Y. X., Li, Y. Y., Zhou, J., Li, D. H., ... Cen, J. R. (2015). Tsukagoshi, H., Busch, W., & Benfey, P. N. (2010). Transcriptional regulation of ROS
Determination of isogarcinol in seven Guttiferae plant species by HPLC. World Science controls transition from proliferation to differentiation in the root. Cell, 143,
Technology, 17, 1872–1875. 606–616.
Ma, Z., Li, C., Qiao, Y., Lu, H. T., Li, J. K., Song, W., ... Wen, A. D. (2016). Safflower yellow Wang, M. Q., Xie, Y. F., Zhong, Y. X., Cen, J. R., Wang, L., Liu, Y. Y., ... Wei, Q. (2016).
B suppresses HepG2 cell injury induced by oxidative stress through the AKT/Nrf2 Amelioration of Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis by Isogarcinol
pathway. International Journal of Molecular Medicine, 37(3), 603–612. Extracted from Garcinia mangostana L. Mangosteen. Journal of Agricultural and Food
Marti, G., Eparvier, V., Litaudon, M., Grellier, P., & Guéritte, F. (2010). A new xanthone Chemistry, 64, 9012–9021.
from the bark extract of Rheedia acuminata and antiplasmodial activity of its major Ward, C. W., Prosser, B. L., & Lederer, W. J. (2014). Mechanical stretch-induced activa-
compounds. Molecules, 15, 7014–7106. tion of ROS/RNS signaling in striated muscle. Antioxidants Redox Signaling, 20,
Martín, S., Gonzálezburgos, E., Carretero, M. E., & Gómez-Serranillos, M. P. (2011). 929–936.
Neuroprotective properties of Spanish red wine and its isolated polyphenols on as- Wen, L., Guo, X., Liu, R. H., You, L., Abbasi, A. M., & Fu, X. (2015). Phenolic contents and
trocytes. Food Chemistry, 128, 40–48. cellular antioxidant activity of Chinese hawthorn “ Crataegus pinnatifida ”. Food
Matsumoto, K., Akao, Y., Kobayashi, E., Ito, T., Ohguchi, K., Tanaka, T., ... Nozawa, Y. Chemistry, 186, 54–62.
(2003). Cytotoxic benzophenone derivatives from Garcinia species display a strong Wu, S. B., Long, C., & Kennelly, E. J. (2014). Structural diversity and bioactivities of
apoptosis-inducing effect against Human Leukemia cell lines. Biological & natural benzophenones. Natural Product Reports, 31, 1158–1174.
Pharmaceutical Bulletin, 26, 569–571. Zadernowski, R., Czaplicki, S., & Naczk, M. (2009). Phenolic acid profiles of mangosteen
Miremadi, F., Ayyash, M., Sherkat, F., & Stojanovska, L. (2014). Cholesterol reduction fruits (Garcinia mangostana). Food Chemistry, 112, 685–689.
mechanisms and fatty acid composition of cellular membranes of probiotic Zarena, A. S., Sachindra, N. M., & Sankar, K. U. (2012). Optimisation of ethanol modified
Lactobacilli, and Bifidobacteria. Journal of Functional Foods, 9, 295–305. supercritical carbon dioxide on the extract yield and antioxidant activity from
Parthasarathi, S., Hong, S. C., Oh, M. H., Park, Y. S., Yoo, J. H., & Pyo, M. K. (2015). Anti- Garcinia mangostana, L. Food Chemistry, 130, 203–208.
oxidant and hepatoprotective effect of white ginsengs in H2O2-treated HepG2 cells. Zhang, L. J., Jia, J. F., Hao, J. G., Cen, J. R., & Li, T. K. (2011). A modified protocol for the
Natural Product Sciences, 21(3), 210–218. comet assay allowing the processing of multiple samples. Mutation Research, 721,
Pisoschi, A. M., & Pop, A. (2015). The role of antioxidants in the chemistry of oxidative 153–156.
stress: A review. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 97(31), 55–62. Zheng, H. Y., Su, N., Huo, T., Zhao, D., Wang, C. T., & Yang, L. (2015). Study on and anti-
Roy, N., Laskar, R. A., Sk, I., Kumari, D., Ghosh, T., & Begum, N. A. (2011). A detailed lipid peroxidation activity of total flavonoids in blueberry leaves. Food Research
study on the antioxidant activity of the stem bark of Dalbergia sissoo Roxb. an Indian Development, 36, 31–34.
medicinal plant. Food Chemistry, 126, 1115–1121. Zhou, S. M., Jiang, L. P., Geng, C. Y., Cao, J., & Zhong, L. F. (2009). Patulin-induced
Shao, L. W., Huang, L. H., Yan, S., Jin, J. D., & Ren, S. Y. (2016). Cordycepin induces genotoxicity and modulation of glutathione in HepG2 cells. Toxicon, 53, 584.
apoptosis in human liver cancer HepG2 cells through extrinsic and intrinsic signaling Zhou, J., Zheng, X., Yang, Q., Liang, Z., Li, D., Yang, X., & Xu, J. (2013). Optimization of
pathways. Oncology Letters, 12(2), 995–1000. ultrasonic-assisted extraction and radical-scavenging capacity of phenols and flavo-
Sies, H. (2015). Oxidative stress: A concept in redox biology and medicine. Redox biology, noids from Clerodendrum cyrtophyllum Turcz leaves. PLoS One, 8, 374.
4, 180–183.
12