Bioentrepreneur - Building A Life Science Venture
Bioentrepreneur - Building A Life Science Venture
Bioentrepreneur - Building A Life Science Venture
Practical tips for graduate students with an aspiration to start a life science venture.
Understand what is • Identify the market for your product: is it sufficiently large to appeal to investors?
required to develop a • Determine the key advantages of your product: target demographic, and possess a competitive
competitive product advantage in a respectable market with a rea-
Lower cost
Superior coverage, efficacy
sonable promise of sufficient remuneration.
Market disruption
Bridging this gap means students need to over-
Build a product that • Determine what is important for a product within the market you are seeking to
come their academic biases to identify commer-
is realistic to develop enter: cially viable products.
and commercialize o Determine the key features to optimize cost and efficacy (80-20 rule) Even if your company has brought an asset
o Limit your product design to contain features that are currently accepted in to the brink of human testing, safety trials,
clinical applications proof of efficacy, and multi-center human
o If your product is highly novel, take steps to reduce its complexity and there- testing (phases 1 through 3) can cost an aver-
fore perceived risk
age of $22.2–71.3 million in the United States,
• Identify what you can use as a measure of efficacy and whether your regulatory
pathway is reasonable depending on the indication1. Thus, a critical
Achieve flight (get- • Become active in business plan competitions, starting initially in student com- issue is whether your lead product addresses
ting off the ground) petitions an area of pressing need and can do so with
• Identify various forms of small-scale funding that can enable you to de-risk your the shortest and most streamlined develop-
company ment pathway. Furthermore, even if you have
Angel investors identified a commercially attractive market, you
STTR and SBIR grants also need to demonstrate that your product has
• Enter discussions with organizations that provide dilutive funding with realistic
clear advantages over existing products (e.g.,
expectations; innovation is secondary to the likelihood of commercial viability
• Expect thorough due-diligence as you progress through negotiations
standard-of-care products) from competitors.
Balance graduate • Expect to work 80–100 hours per week and make efforts to organize your time
Those advantages might include a substantial
student and entre- efficiently reduction in manufacturing costs, a superior
preneur lifestyle • Maintain an open dialog with your advisor about your company and discuss product, or the ability to address a market
strategies to ensure that the interests both of you are protected issue not being currently addressed. Whatever
the case, you must do a thorough product
comparison to current commercial vaccines
and therapeutics, as well as to those currently
the business nuances of our field. Thus, any The hard part is that it’s difficult to obtain in development.
aspiring student entrepreneurs should identify, mentorships from world-class business lead- One of the first considerations is cost.
attend, and actively participate in key business ers, so do not become discouraged if you aren’t Although you may not be able to find out how
networking conferences. immediately successful. We found success only much your competitors spend to produce their
To overcome our inexperience with the com- after consistently attending business competi- products (called the cost of goods (COGs)),
plete vaccine developmental cycle, we recruited tions and industrial conferences, and engag- you can get a ballpark comparison using cur-
a team of experts with decades of corporate and ing with numerous individuals at each event. rent market prices while assuming a significant
clinical/regulatory experience. This allowed us In our experience, we had a 15% success rate markup. For example, if a competitor’s product
to draw upon their knowledge and dramati- in recruiting during our early growth phases. is offered using a tiered-pricing structure (i.e.,
cally improve our development strategy. A Impeding the process was our lack of credibility different markets/countries can purchase at
key relationship for us came from Margaret and inability to provide competitive compensa- discounted rates), you can approximate their
McGlynn, the former president of Merck’s tion. Our success came with individuals who COGS based upon third-world countries’
Global Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division shared our vision of the future and who were prices as these markets are often not capable of
and CEO of the International Aids Vaccine at a stage of their careers when they could take purchasing at a premium. However, if you plan
Initiative (New York). She agreed to serve as risks. to enter an established market as an entrepre-
an advisor to our company and we leveraged neur, you should always endeavor to develop
her network to establish contact with numer- Expanding the researcher perspective a product that solves a pressing need, rather
ous vaccine experts. Students often enter graduate school to partici- than one that is simply cheaper. Creating an
An experienced advisor can influence oth- pate in cutting-edge research and to fulfill their improved ‘me too’ product may be appealing in
ers to appreciate your potential, which can desire to solve world problems. This is noble, large markets, but startups lack the resources to
help with both investments and partnerships. but the goals of academic excellence—which compete with large multinationals that possess
an economy of scale advantage (i.e., the abil- your product’s respective regulations), all your key actionable items that build your company’s
ity to produce goods at a lower cost due to the previous R&D efforts will have been made in value, developing a clear (and realistic) vision
size of their production process). For example, vain (Box 1). for your company, and integrating any feed-
in the vaccine sector where Abcombi oper- You should create a clinical development back you receive.
ates, the five largest players control 75% of the plan and map out your regulatory pathway
global market, according to an analysis by the before finalizing your indications. We drafted Funding. How can a student raise sufficient
Program for Appropriate Technology in Health our plan and regulatory pathway internally, capital? The lack of credibility here com-
(Seattle), and are capable of competing at price but refined them through contracting consul- plicates things, especially with traditional
points well below levels required for sustain- tants that possessed substantial experience in routes such as venture capital. This means
ability for a startup. major pharmaceutical companies familiar that beyond raising funds from the three F’s
To determine whether or not your indication with vaccine development. When completing (friends, family, and fools), you will need to
has superior performance, develop a compre- these plans we modified our vaccine compo- consider a range of investors and investment
hensive understanding of the market you are sition and marketing strategy after gaining vehicles that are a realistic avenue for students,
© 2017 Nature America, Inc., part of Springer Nature. All rights reserved.
seeking to enter and the problems within it. For an appreciation for how difficult it is to earn as well as the pros and cons of each route2.
example, if you are developing an antibacte- regulatory approval. Specifically, student competitions, such as
rial asset, first determine what the rate of resis- The take-home message is that if you those around business plans, represent an ideal
tance development is for other antibacterial develop a realistic path to licensure early in starting point because their mechanisms are
drugs against your target pathogen, followed your endeavors, you will save a lot of time designed to teach and refine the skills needed
by quantifying your product’s superiority over and effort later. Furthermore, you also will be for securing funding from traditional routes.
competitors, and finally, determine the limita- better prepared for discussions with inves- These opportunities are often offered through
tions of competing interventions towards the tors and present a more attractive investment your university’s business school.
goal of designing solutions. Understanding opportunity. Our experience taught us that Once you’ve gained experience in student
the market you plan to enter better positions having plans for marketing and obtaining competitions, you should transition to larger
you to develop a product that clearly solves a licensure is critical to obtaining funding for business-related funding competitions, rang-
pressing need. even preclinical research. ing from local economic initiatives, such as
the 43North business competition in Buffalo,
Commercial feasibility Achieving flight New York, to national and international enti-
A common academic bias is that the best solu- After identifying your product and founding ties3. There are also government programs
tions are both novel and provide the strongest your company, you’ll need funding. There that can help4. Specifically, if you are a gradu-
impact, but as an entrepreneur, you should are two kinds of investments: dilutive and ate student based in the United States, you
focus on a ‘good enough’ product, one that non-dilutive of company equity. You’ll want can apply for non-dilutive Small Business
possesses 80% of the functionality at 20% of to understand the positives and negatives Innovation Research (SBIR) or Small Business
the cost. This is called the 80-20 rule, and associated with each type of funding, which Technology Transfer (STTR) grants offered by
is derived from factors that aren’t always will improve your likelihood of matching the the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) or
accounted for in academic research. interests of particular sources. In preparation the National Science Foundation.
Businesses are profit-driven, so your pri- of potential funding events, you will need to These government business grants are simi-
mary objective should be shepherding a prom- take steps to improve your company’s investor lar to traditional academic funding sources,
ising product to market rather than spending attractiveness. These steps include identifying such as NIH R01, R21, and R03 grants, but
an extended period on its perfection. This is
especially important if you are considering the
addition of novel features to obtain the stron- Box 1 A cautionary tale
gest possible clinical outcome. The healthcare
industry’s take on innovation has been shaped It is important to understand all the challenges along the discovery, preclinical and
by years of failures and delays, and it has thus clinical development pathway. We learned this lesson while developing our inexpensive,
shifted its emphasis to innovations that add potentially universal (as a standalone) common protein vaccine for pneumococcal
the most value to the patient, manufacturing disease. Ultimately, our entire solution turned out to be non-viable because we had
process (e.g., cost reductions), distribution failed to take into account a key clinical development consideration.
channels, or product use. Consequently, com- Because the composition of our vaccine candidate differed substantially from
pleting clinical trials using novel technologies the composition of current commercial vaccines, we did not possess an established
is often arduous and you may not possess a correlate of protection to evaluate our vaccine’s efficacy. This was further complicated
clear regulatory pathway. For example, use of by regulations that prevent the standard of care (in this case, Prevnar; pneumococcal
novel adjuvants in vaccines is not permitted in polysaccharide conjugate vaccine) from being denied to patients. Consequently, our
infants and generally requires demonstration phase 3 trial needed to demonstrate that co-vaccination of our indication with Prevnar
significantly reduced the incidence of pneumococcal disease caused by serotypes
that the adjuvant is both safe and necessary
Prevnar does not provide protection against. Because the incidence of invasive
for efficacy. By designing your product with
pneumococcal disease in regions that employ routine vaccination with Prevnar is below
your endgame in mind, you can substantially
100 per 100,000, a power analysis demonstrating our vaccine’s efficacy necessitated
reduce the complexity of its path forward.
a massive phase 3 trial with tens of thousands of patients. Consequently, the costs
As you design your product and plan your
associated with obtaining regulatory approval for our vaccine drastically outweighed its
regulatory pathway, be prepared to make
potential benefits. As a consequence, we were forced to redesign our vaccine from the
adjustments. Unless you have a clear and
ground up. Lesson learnt.
realistic pathway to licensure (i.e., navigating