Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
101 views4 pages

Balanced Scorecard Basics

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 4

Balanced Scorecard Basics

The balanced scorecard retains traditional financial measures. But financial measures tell the
story of past events, an adequate story for industrial age companies for which investments in
long-term capabilities and customer relationships were not critical for success. These financial
measures are inadequate, however, for guiding and evaluating the journey that information age
companies must make to create future value through investment in customers, suppliers,
employees, processes, technology, and innovation."

Adapted from Robert S. Kaplan and David P. Norton, “Using the Balanced Scorecard as a
Strategic Management System,” Harvard Business Review (January-February 1996): 76.

Perspectives
The balanced scorecard suggests that we view the organization from four perspectives, and to
develop metrics, collect data and analyze it relative to each of these perspectives:

The Learning & Growth Perspective


This perspective includes employee training and corporate cultural attitudes related to both
individual and corporate self-improvement. In a knowledge-worker organization, people -- the
only repository of knowledge -- are the main resource. In the current climate of rapid
technological change, it is becoming necessary for knowledge workers to be in a continuous
learning mode. Metrics can be put into place to guide managers in focusing training funds where
they can help the most. In any case, learning and growth constitute the essential foundation for
success of any knowledge-worker organization.
Kaplan and Norton emphasize that 'learning' is more than 'training'; it also includes things like
mentors and tutors within the organization, as well as that ease of communication among
workers that allows them to readily get help on a problem when it is needed. It also includes
technological tools; what the Baldrige criteria call "high performance work systems."

The Business Process Perspective


This perspective refers to internal business processes. Metrics based on this perspective allow
the managers to know how well their business is running, and whether its products and services
conform to customer requirements (the mission). These metrics have to be carefully designed by
those who know these processes most intimately; with our unique missions these are not
something that can be developed by outside consultants.
The Customer Perspective
Recent management philosophy has shown an increasing realization of the importance of
customer focus and customer satisfaction in any business. These are leading indicators: if
customers are not satisfied, they will eventually find other suppliers that will meet their needs.
Poor performance from this perspective is thus a leading indicator of future decline, even though
the current financial picture may look good.
In developing metrics for satisfaction, customers should be analyzed in terms of kinds of
customers and the kinds of processes for which we are providing a product or service to those
customer groups.

The Financial Perspective


Kaplan and Norton do not disregard the traditional need for financial data. Timely and accurate
funding data will always be a priority, and managers will do whatever necessary to provide it. In
fact, often there is more than enough handling and processing of financial data. With the
implementation of a corporate database, it is hoped that more of the processing can be
centralized and automated. But the point is that the current emphasis on financials leads to the
"unbalanced" situation with regard to other perspectives. There is perhaps a need to include
additional financial-related data, such as risk assessment and cost-benefit data, in this category.
What is a Key Performance Indicator (KPI)?
KPI’s are performance measures that indicate progress toward a desirable outcome. Strategic
KPIs monitor the implementation and effectiveness of an organization's strategies, determine the
gap between actual and targeted performance and determine organization effectiveness and
operational efficiency.   
Good KPIs: 
 Provide an objective way to see if strategy is working
 Offer a comparison that gauges the degree of performance change over time
 Focus employees' attention on what matters most to success
 Allow measurement of accomplishments, not just of the work that is performed
 Provide a common language for communication
 Help reduce intangible uncertainty
 Are valid, to ensure measurement of the right things
 Are verifiable, to ensure data collection accuracy
KPIs are invaluable tools for managing work towards a desired outcome. Most of us have heard
some version of the standard performance measurement cliches: 

 “What gets measured gets done"


 "If you don’t measure results, you can’t tell success from failure and thus you can’t claim
or reward success or avoid unintentionally rewarding failure”
 "If you can’t recognize success, you can’t learn from it; if you can’t recognize failure, you
can’t correct it"
 “If you can’t measure it, you can neither manage it nor improve it"
But while most executives and managers agree that the use of performance measures is a
foundational element of good management, most struggle to:

 Easily find meaningful measures


 Get true buy-in to performance measurement
 Strongly align measures to strategy
 Use measures to drive improvement
These struggles are due to bad habits that, in the absence of a proper performance
measurement methodology and expertise, have become common practice.

How to Develop KPIs


The methodologies taught were created to help organizations redesign their performance
measurement process. These practical step-by-step methodologies and tools were designed to
help organizations:

 Make their strategy measurable and easier to communicate and cascade


 Select and design performance measures that are far more meaningful than
brainstorming or benchmarking ever can produce
 Get buy-in from staff and stakeholders to enthusiastically own performance measurement
and improvement
 Bring their measures to life in a consistent way, using the right data and with the right
ownership
 Design insightful and actionable reports and dashboards that focus discussion on
improvement
 Clearly see the real signals from their measures about whether performance is improving
or not
 Convincingly hit performance targets, and make measurement about transformation
Steps in the process include:
Pre-KPI: Always begin by articulating your strategy properly. Use one of the many popular
frameworks for strategy or goal setting (Balanced Scorecard, SMART, MBO, OKRs, WIGs, or
other) to set objectives/goals and determine your strategy for achieving them.
KPI development steps:

 Describe the intended result(s)


 Understand alternative measures
 Select the right measurement(s) for each goal/objective
 Define composite indicators as needed
 Set targets and thresholds
 Define and document selected performance measures
Performance analysis steps:

 Select the most appropriate automation tool


 Collect and monitor performance
 Analyze and draw conclusions
 Improve performance

You might also like