Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Sec 64 RCC

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Section 64 is about the liability of directors for watered stocks.

Watered stocks are stocks issued for no value at all or is issued at a higher value than it is actually worth
(either in cash, property, services, or stock dividends.)

It includes stocks that are:

1. Issued for without consideration – BONUS SHARE


2. Issued as fully paid when the corporation has received a lesser sum of money than its par or
issued value – DISCOUNT SHARE
3. Issued for a consideration other than actual cash, such as property or services, the fair valuation
[fair vaue] of which is less than its par or issued value
4. Issued a stock dividend when there are no sufficient retained earnings or surplus

The issue itself is not void, but the agreement that the shares shall be paid for less than its par or issued
value is illegal and void and it cannot be enforced.

It is prohibited to issue WS to protect the persons who will acquire the stocks or those who may become
creditors of the corporation in good faith with the knowledge that the outstanding capital stock being fully
paid.

It is only prohibited to the original issue of the stocks and not the subsequent transfer – why? It is because
it will no longer be an issue but a sale.

Treasury shares may be sold for less than their par or issued value – for they have already been issued and
paid for – provided that the price is reasonable.

For the corporation – the issuance is not merely ultra vires but illegal per se.

For the creditors – the liability attaches to whether or not the creditors have relied on an over-valuation of
corporate capital.

The law holds the director or officer who – as specifically stated in SEC 64:

1. Who consents to the issuance of stocks for a consideration less than its par value
2. Who consents to the issuance of the stocks for a consideration other than cash, valued in excess
of its fair value; and,
3. Having knowledge of the insufficient consideration, does not file a written objection with the
corporate secretary

They are to be held solidary liable with the shareholder who benefitted from such issuance to the
corporation or its creditor.

(Solidary liable – either of them can be held liable for the whole amount of the difference.

Note: the fair value of the stock is determined at the time of issuance – so that the subsequent increase in
value of property given as consideration will not eliminate the water in the stock and relieve the director
or officer from the liability.
It is one of the cases that the corporation fiction be pierced

You might also like