Audtheo PDF
Audtheo PDF
Audtheo PDF
cHAPTER
An Introduction to
·Assurance, Auditing,
and Related Services
A. ASSURANCE SERVICES
c. '
An Income tax engagement to prepare tax returns.
·o..A compilation of financial statements from a dlent's ac-
counting records.
, , \ • • • •. . • l
A. I only
· c. Both I and Ii
ct Neither I nor Il
& B. II only
'\ ·
1111111
. .
CPA EXAM/NATION REVIEWER: AUDITING THEo
'' Ft'(
'
. Assurance services differ from ·consulting services in that
me~ ' '
1. .Focus on enhancing the ·credibility of information ra.
ther than providing advice. ·
2. TyPically i~volve situations fn which one party wa,its
to monitor another. _ . .
B. No
&
C. Yes . Yes .
o. No Yes
A . . . .
n assurance en -
ments-: gagement should h .
ave the following ele-
1. At·hree-party • ·
a a relationsh. . .
. Professional lp involving:
accountant;
CtiAPTER 1 An Introduction to Assurance, Audning, and Related Services 5
,\ccording
gagements tothethe
resPhili ~pme
. Framework for Assurance En· .
' pons1ble party' d h · · · ·
be from differententif .. . an t e intended users may
. . •1es or the same entity. . ·
AnswerD 1·s mcorrect
· b ··
ble for determining th ecause th e pra~ti'oner is r~ponsi·
· · an d· -extent of proce·
·dures to be performed.e nature' tim mg
CHAP"tER 1 An ln~oductlon to Assurance, Auditing, aoo Related Services 7
~- Reviews o. Examl'nations
For assurance engagements regarding historical financial in-
formation, reasonable assurance engagements ar~ called au-
dits, while limited assurance eng~gements are called ·reviews. _
14. The criteria against which the subject matter of the assurance ·
en~agement is to be.- evaluated or measured should possess
which of the following characteristics? ·
CRVA-R
- >
'Relevant · ConCise
&A. Neutral
B. Yes No Yes
C. No Yes No
D. Yes No No
No Yes Yes
According to the Ph ·1. . - -
gagernents, sufrable ;r~~PI?e :ramework for Assurance_Eil-
acteristics: _ eria 5 ould ~ave the foHowing char-
t Relevance
• Relevant . . ·
d . . . criteria contrib -
ec1s1~n-making by th . Ute to conclusions that assist
,. e intended users. .
CHAPTER 1 An Introduction to Assurance, Audtting, and Related Services 9
2. Completeness
• Criteria are sufficiently complete when relevant fac- .
tors that could affect the conclusions in the context of
the engagement are not omitted.
• Complete criteria include, where relevant, bench-
marks for presentation and disclosure._
3. Reliability ·
• Rel!able criteria allow reasonably consistent evalua-
tion or 11.1easurement of the subject matter including,
where relevant, presentation and disclosure, when
used in similar circumstances by similarly qualified ·
practitioners.
4. N eutrality
• Neutral criteria contribute to conclusions that are
free from bias.
5. Understandability .
• Understandable criteria contribute to conclusions
that are clear,.comprehensive, and not subject to sig-
nificantly _different interpretations.
o. General criteria
,.
The Framework states that criteria can eithe'r be establishe
or specificaUy developed. . ·
D. Oient
32. An -
unmodified conclusion Is not appropriate for either rea-
-
u:
B. Rev,e~ engagements onl only. ,
C. Compdation and revie y. .
⑧ D~ All services that fail _engagements only. . . .
th
,
ards. d~r e AA.scrs engagement stand-: .
CHAPTER 1 An Introduction to Assurance, Auditing, and Related Services 21
This
assurance.
repprt. · , . · ·
o..Downgrade the engagement to ,a compilation and issue
the appropriate report.
If the practitioner has reason to be\ieve that the information
subject to review·may bEi materially i'i)!sstated, _he/she should
· carry Outadditioiial or more extenSive procedures as are nec-
essacy.to be .able to expr~~s negative assurance or to confirm
that a modified conclusion is required.
material misstatement. .
B. A review of interim ~nancial information does not provi~e
a basis .for expressing an opinion whether the financiaUn·
formation ,is presented fairly, i11 all, material respects, in
accordance with an applic~bfe financial reporting ·frame-
work. · ,
C. In a revi~ of- interim financial information the auditor·
should have an understanding ·of th~ entity 'and·its envi~
ronment, including its internal control. · ·
D. A review of interim financial lnformatio'n.may bring signif-
icant matters affecting the ;·nterfm financiaf informa~ion to
th
~ auditor's attention, but it does not provide all of th e
evidence that would be require~ in an audit.
procedures engagement? . .
A. Reasonable C. Mod,erate
B. Absolute &
D. ··No assurance
sfnee
mi . others, unaware of the reasons for the procedures, rnaY
smterpret the results. . .
Answer Dis incorrect because the auditor need not be the en·
tity's continuing auditor.
64. Reports on agreed-upon procedures are intended to be dis·
tributed.
A.
&
To only the involved parties, who are aware of the reasons
for the procedures• . · · ··
B, O~ly to the stockholders of the entity.
( c. To any party to whom the client wishes.
D. Only to the entity's management.
65. A~ engagem:nt ~o perform agreed-upon procedures ,nay·in-
volve ~e auditor mperforming·certain procedures concerning
J. Individual items of financial data. ·. ·
II. Asingle financial statement.
.. III. Acomplete set of 6nancfal statements.
s:A. I and II only .
II and III I
. .
C. I and III only
· on Y 2
D. I, II, and III
. 66. should
The report
containon an agreed-upon · procedures engagemeilt
CHAPTER 1 An Introduction to Assurance, Audttlg, and Related Services 33
&
A. Identification of the purpose for which the agreed-upon
procedures were perfonned. · .
B. An expression of positive assurance based on the specific
procedures perfonned.
C. A statem~nt that the auditor Is Independent of the entity.
D. A general description of tt,e procedures performed.
error.
A. I and II only C. I,_,II, -and Ill only•
OB. II and IV only D. I, II, III, and IV
A. Unmodified opinion
B. Qualified or adverse opinion
O
C. Qualified or disdainier of opinion
D. Disclaimer of opinion
~ddeOned
·
-
CHAPTER 1 An Introduction to Assurance, Auditing, and Related Services 39
R
C. A discipline which attests to the results of accounting and
other functional operations and data.
D. A regulatory function that prevents the issuance of im-
. proper financial information.
84. Which of the following elements does not relate to audit qual-
·ty?
I •
A. Audit competence·
B. Audit fees ·
&
c. Independe_ nce.
D. Due d_iligence
Audit quality is an overall concept that encompasses adher-
ence · to independence, auditor competence, due diligence,
and. quality control processes. · '
"""
44 CPA EXAMINATION REVIEWER: AUDITING·THEO~y
INTERNAL1OPERATI0NAL AUDITING .
B. The
.al accuracy of the data reflected in management's
. • ·t1nan -
Cl records.
C. The verification th · ·· irlY
presented. at a company's ·financlal report Is fa
CHAPTER 1 An Introduction to Assurance, Auditing, and Related Servioes 47
internal controls. ·
II. To detennine the extent to which assigned responsibili-
ties ~re actually carried out. . . ·
III. To ·collect evidence on whether the company is continu-
ing as a going concern. ·· · .
O
A. I and II only C. II and III pnly
B. I and III only .D. I, II, and III·
' . ,
48
CPA EXAMINAnON REVIEWER: AUDITING THEO~y
c.
Requiring internal auditors to report all signifi
cant findings
of fraud and lll'egal activity to the·company pre
D. None of the ·above. sident. · •
confidence on the
fair pre sen tat ion of the company's financial
sta tem ent s.
102: Internal auditors review the adequacy of the
company's inter-
. nal control system primarily to •
A. Help .determine the nature, timing, and ext
ent _of tests
necessary to achieve au~it objectives. .
· B. Determine whether the internal ·control ,sys
tem provides
reasonable assurance .that the company's object
ives and
Q.oals are .met efficiently and e~onomically.
C. Ensure that mate~lal weakr,es~es in the sys
control are corrected. tem of internal
·
· D.. Determine whether the int~rnal corjtrol
system. ens
that financial statements are fairly pre$ented .
· · ures
52 CPA EXAM/NA noN REVIEWI ·R: AUDITING THEOA~
Answers A and 8 -are incorr ect becau se they relate to the re--
liability and integr ity of information.
- .
'
.l
Op era tio na l a~
_ dits ge ne ral ~y h~ ve ~.een conducted by internal
106.
rmed by certified public
· and COA auditors,_ but may be perfo
ts. A·_ µn ma ry pu rpo se of an op erational audit is to
accoun tan . .
provide ··
rmance i.n meeting or-
A. A ~ea~ure of management perfo •
gamzational goals.
xaminations 0 f .fl . 'd · •
B. The results .of internal .em 1nanc1al an ac
co
·- un tin g ma tte rs to ·a co ,
c. Aid to the ind ep en de nt au di~ ~y
5
top_-level management.
15 conducting the ex·
alllin ati on of the fin ari cla l sta ~, .:~ o
· .
o. A me__ans of assurance tha. t .mt~rn~Its.accounting controls
are functioning as plan~ed
.
Operational auditing in vo1ves a syst ·
i
° f ·. ,
at ~n an. entity s act'IV•Jtie . . emat1c review and evalu-f
·t res rces and the effecti s 1n rel Ion to· tµe efficient use o
f
1
. i. s ou h' ; b'ec
t1ves. , . .Veness in acc . ompJ1·s 1ng1tso j -
pa
GOVERNMENTAL AUDITING
'
cHAPTER 1 An Introduction to Assurance, Auditing, and.Related Services 59
Answer A is inc orre ct bec aus e aud itor s ass ess con trol risk
in
term s of financial stat em ent assertions. ·
Ans wer Bis inc orre ct bec aus e man age men t is resp ons ible
for
ass urin g tha t the ent ity complies wit h applicable law
s and
reg ula tion s.
Answer D is inc orre ct bec aus e aud itor s are prim aril y
con-
cer ned wit h tho se tha t hav e dire ct and mat eria l effects
on fi-
nancial sta tem ent amo unt s.
.
D. ·evaluate the sy~tem used to measure results.
.
The aud it of a gov ern me nt pro gra m involves obt ain ing
info r-
mat ion abo u·t the costs, o_u tpu ts, ben efit s, and effe cts
pro gra m. of the
1
1 •
.
Aud itor s atte mp t to -me asu re the acc om plis hm ent s
. suc
t1ve d
ces s o f t.he pro gra m base d on. the actual i t an re1a-
leg isla tion tha t esta blis hed the program. n ent of the
60 CPA EXAM/NA Tl(?N REVIEWER: AUDm ~G THE0R1
, '
C. Confidential reviewer
D. Objective advisor
cHAPTER
-
1 An lnlroductJon to Assurance, AUditing,. and Related Semces · a ·t
. .
116. .Which of the following are c~nsldered consulting services?
Advisory Transaction AssuraAce
Services Seryices Services
A. No Yes Yes
B. . Yes Yes No
C. Yes , No Yes
D. Yes · Yes ·Yes -
Ass~ranc;e service s are "indep endent profess ional se~ce s
that are intende d to enhanc e the .credibi lity of inform ation to
meet the needs of an'inte nded user."
. - ..
Assura nce service s do not encomp ass consult ing service s.
Adviso ry service s and transac tion service s are both consult -
ing service s. · ·
'
..J
-
CHAPTER 1 An Introduction to Assurance, Auditing, and Related Services 63
The Financial
Statement Audit:
Client Acceptance
. . ' . .
and Plantµng
of
2. Which the following factors most likely would .cause an
auditor to decline a new audit engagement?
194
CPA EXAM/NA noN REVIEWER. AUDITING 'llii;:oll-,
D. t· dose
period.
proximity .to the end of the entity's reporu~g
AnsWer·B is incorrect
. because a·disclai·me r of opm1on
• • 1•s ap-
propriate on 1y 1f the auditor cannot resolve an issue by per-
.forming alternative procedures.
L,,
•vAMfNAnON.REVIEWER: AUDITING l'fito
. CPA EN"
t9S
hr,
200
CPA EXAMINA noN REVIEWER: AUDlllNc ,.Ii
to~
~anagement is responsible for the preparation of the ·
cial statements in accordance with the appllcabJe :Qa~
cl~! reporting framework, including where relevant Qhan.
fair presentation.. t eir
A I Q
.J..J Of special terms of lhe audit
,,w ~ ,.:.....,erli
I'~ .:::.- of senior management Y-
•• No YH No
,~~tlif,n·"'.!s1 or ,egulatolY req_uirements Yes No No No
" '' IVIJ fn tu Yes Yes Yes Yes
'ffC8'1' chan98 na re or SIZII of lhe 89
,iP. .s riu-:
"-_,;ry . . ..a1ness · y · Yes Yes · YH
ments.
1The auditor shall not agree to a request from the entitY to
dlange the termS of the audit engagement or to change the ·
audit engagemerit to an engagement that oonvevs a tower
level of assurance when there Is nO rea5()nable justification
flt doing so. Which of the following may be consklered rea·
sonable Justifications for the change in the audit engage-
ment? . . . .
· ture of an audit as ON
II. A misunderstanding as to the na
inally requested. f the engagement, whether
III. A restriction on the scope caused by other drcurn..
O
imposed by· management or ·
$nces.
A. I and II only
B. I and III only
C.· II and III only
D~ I, II, and III ·
,. . e in circumstances that affects ·
PSA 210 states that a chang . u·nderstandf ng concerning
t he entity . or .a .mis
· 's requ1·rements ally req·u·ested may be con-
the nature of the service .0 r!gin ~esting a change in the
sidered a reasona~le basis ,or reg ·
audit. engagement
A restriction on the scope of the a~dit wou,Jd not be consid-
ered a reasonabJejustifica~ion for the change. .
For example, achange would not .be considered reaso~able
if the auditor is unable td obtain sufficient appropriate audit
evidence regarding receivables and the dient requ·ests that
, the audit engageme~t be changed to a r_eview engagement .
to avoid a qualified opini~n or a disclaime~ of opi~ion. .
ment
JI. Developing an audit plan.
A. I only
B. II only
C. Both I arid II
~- N either I nor II
23. Which of the following activities shoi.rld be_ performed bY the
auditor at the t,eginnl119 of the Cl/rrent audit engagement?
- 1. Perform procedures regarding .the continuance of the
dient rela!fonshlp and the specific audit engagement.
n. Evah.1ate compliance wtth relevant ethical requll'ements
. indudlll9 independence. - _ - '
lll. Establish an understanding of the terms of ttie engage-
ment ·
A. I and II only
B. II and III only
C. I and Ill only
'
D. I, II, and III \
e~ 4 The Financial Statement Audff:. Client Acceptance and Plan, ,Ing 209
crJfr ..
· equate planning helps to ensure that
Ad ·
A a Q
. roprlate attention Is devoted
APP important-areas of the audit
:ntial problems ~re Identified
No Yes Yes No '
P~nd resolved on a timely basis Yes Yes No No
'fhe audit engagement. ls properly ,
organized and managed . Yes Yes ·No No
1
g and dfrr.ctfon of the audit
sets the scope, tf m~nt of the audit plan. ' and tha
gµtdes the deveJopm . . . I
. hi the overall audit strategy, ,the auditor
In establiS ng .. . _is re.
quired to_:
·tify the characteristics of the engagelllen
a) Id en . . t th
define its scope; . . at
b) Ascertain the reporting obje~ives of the engagenie
to plan the timing of ~he audit and the nature of nt
communications required; . . . the
c) Consider the factors that, in the auditor's profes .
'fi t . d' . s1on.
al judgment,
r
. are s1gn1
•
1can m 1recting the eng
age.
ment team's~efforts; - ·
d) Consider the results of ~reliminary engagement ac.
tivities and, where apphcable, whether knowledg
gained on othe'r engagements perfo~med by the en~
gagement .
partner for. the entity is relevant; and ··
'
Only after obtaining knowledge ()f the entity and its envi-
ronment, .including its internal control and assessing the
risks of material misstatement can the .auditor determine
the nature, timing,· and extent of substantive tests of finan- .
cial statement assertions.
36.. Io designing written audit programs, an auditor should .es-
tablish specific audit objectives that relate primarily to the
A. Selected audit techniques. ·
,B. Cost-benefit of gathering audit evidence.
C. Timing of. audit procedures.
D. Ananclal statement assertions. ·.
.•,,R· AUDITIN G...._.
11
216 CPA EXAMtNA r,oN REVIE f'r' • • 8:0~
C. Bther I or II
D. Both I and II
an audit en gage m ent,~ proposed (succes.
41. Bef~re accepting shou ld m ake Inqu iries o f the Previous
sor/1ncomlng) auditor l~ g the previous audlt?r's
or ) audito r re ga rd
(predecess rs o f co nt in ui ng ac co unt,ng slgn1n..
atte
A. Evaluation o f all m · -
canc e,
to th e re as on s fo r th e change o f audi-
B. Understanding as
tors.
e co ns iste nc y in th e application of
C. Awareness o f th
riods.
PAS/PFRS between pe uent events occurring since the
eq
D. Opinion on any subs as is su ed . _ · .
o
p_ rt w
previous auditor's re
ir es th e pr op os ed au ditor to communi-
T h e st an d ar d requ us au di to r be fo re accepting the
prev io
ca te di re ct ly with the
en ga ge m en t.
. .
ou ld in it ia te th e co mmunication,
sh
T h e pr op os e_d auditor ie nt pe rm is si on to · communi-
ta in cl
al th ou gh both m us t ob
cate.
qu ir e ab o u t re as o n s tor the
The pr op os ed auditor sh
, d~ sa
ou
gr
ld
ee m
in
en ts w ith manageinent con-
cha~ge in audi~o rs Q ce dures, and
cipl es an d au di ting pr
ce rn in g a~counting ~rin ity o f th e en ti ty 's management ·
_facts be~ring on the in
tegr
· ,
ditor is required to d t . different levels of
42. Th e au l rt y fie er m ine three
· materiallty:• (1) mater ~ ~ e finan cial statements as a
~ a t:
whole,. (2) perforinanc: na l,ty, an d (3 ) · .
A. Overall materiality
B. Planning materiality ,
c. General materiality
~- Specific materiality
r
4 The Ffnandal Statement AUdlt: Client Acee ta
· P nee and ~lannlng 219
he audf tor fs required to determt
'f ateriality. These are ne th ree-.different levels
ofrn
1. Materfalf ty for the financial sta
(also called overall mat . 1 tements as a whole
··or eria ity' gener ·1 t rf 1·
tolerable misstateme~t) a ma e a 1ty,
2. Performance materiality (also call d I .
riality or scoping materiality) e P anning mate-
3·. ·M~teriality applied to spedflc classes of transaction~
account balances or disclosures_(also called·specifi~
materiality or individual materiality)
. Individual materiality
D . . Per.ce
e · ted as_a ce tain
r
Performanc materJalJty, ca lcula
g of finan :1•
a ed in sco pin
ve~all. materiality, is us uditor. .
aJ
:~ of o test~d y the a
ems to be b
s .a ement J1ne it
c o un ts in th e financ;al
a t significant a c
il l e
_n su re th
This w ov ere d by audit testing.
re c
. statements a
t se t by th e a uditor for /Jar-
. Is the am~un nt ba la nces or discJo-
45. ns , a c co u
es o f transactio
ticular class wer than over- ·
ll though lo
fluence the
tatem e nts, w e
miss
sures fo r which ld reasonably ·be expected to in ts.
all materiality cioouns of users of the financial statemen
economic decis
· o rm a n c e materiality
A. P erf
teriality
B. Planning ma ality
teri
C. Specific ma riality
te
D. General ma late d by mul-
ls is ca lc u
f th e re qu ire d materiality leve p ria te b enchmark
hic h o a pp ro
46. · W
a c e ~ a in p e rc entage by the nt o f a n entity's fi-
tiplying element or. co m p o ne
h is e ith e r a n
whic
nts?
nancial stateme riality
A. ·Overall mate riality ·
a. Planning maateteriality
c. Scoping m
o. Specific materiality
are n o rm ally considered by
th ~ following factors
h enchmark for
!!,:U~!~~ ~i
47. W h ic ~ f r iate b
a pp r op
~:r"3ningovethraell materiality?
a. ng
·'
p o r, en ts o f th e entity' fi ana.al statements
I. Com d regulations s n
II.· L aw s a n
entity
III. _Nature of the
22 1
The Financial Statement Audit: Clktnl Acceptance and Plsnn/ng
'¢~ 4
I' C. II and III only
I and II only
:: .I and III only D. I, 11, and III
0 obtain_ a sufft.
e ex te rr- aJ au di to ~ t.
The st an da rd re qu ir es th
•
de rs ta nd in g of in te rn al au di t activitie~ to identity
ci en t un is st at em en t in th e tlnan.
se ss th e ris ks of m at er ia l m
an d as pe rf or m fu rt he r audft
an d to de si gn an ·d
cial st at em en ts
procedures.
rn al au di t fu nc tio n is a fa ct or th at may influ.
Thus, an inte of th e ex te rn al auditor's
tu re , tim in g, an d ex te nt
en ce th e na
procedures. ·
60. Whicti of- the following ·are induded in the activities of the ·
internal audit function? · · ·
I. Monitoring of Internal co~trol.
II. Examination of financial and operating information_•.
III. _
Review of operating activities. 1 /
A. I and Il only
-s. I and 'III only ·
C. II and III only
D.. I, II, and III
228 · CPA EXAMINA noN REVIEWER: AUD111NQ
' ' ' °llig:C)~
The activities of the internal audit function may incl
&: II ·ng· . · Ude 0ne
or more of the 10 OWi •
• Monitoring of internal control. · .
• Examination of financial and operating inform
• Review of operating activities. . . , atton.
• Review of compliance with laws.and regul~tions. ·
• . Risk manag~ment ;
• Governance
61. . i Is an in~ividual or organization po~ing ex•·
pertise in a field other ,than acc~un_t!ng or a~d1ting, whese
work In that field Is used by·the auditor to a~s,st the auditor
In obtaining sufficient appropriate .audit evidence. ·.
A. Auditor's expert · · ·
B. Management's er.pert
c. Expert
D. Specialist . ·
N ei th er I no r II
o. . ·
w ln g st at em en ts Is ·
Wfllch o f th e fo llo k an ex pe ,t ~ rr ec t co nc er ni ng th e
or
64· udltor's us e o f th erewqu
o f
. a Th e au di to r ls ire d to
pe rfo ·
s as rm su bs ta nt e teiv
·
st pr o-
to ve rif y th e ex pe rt'
A- ce du re s pt lo ns an d' fln dl ng s.
by
ou ld ob ta in a su m
s ,h e au di to r sh l~ ns us ed u~ ~e rs ta nd fn ~ of th e
m pt
· m et ho ds an d as su ve an un ex pe rt . ·
t ha
er st an dl nq of th e na -
ou ld no
C. :n ,e en tit y sh be pe rfo rm -d bd
tu re o f th e w or k Id to e Y th e ex pe rt . f
. · ex pe rt s h ou no t ha ve an un de rs tand.1ng o ·th e au-
D· Th e_,, · b ti ·- e o.f th e ex_pe rt' s fl n di ng s.
di to , s co rr o or a ye us
e fo r th e ap pr op i- ia te ne ss and re a _
The ex pe rt is r· re sp on si
pt
bl
. ns
io
. an d m et ho ds us ed .
so na bl en es s o as su m
is e, .
_~u di to r d_ o~ s no t ha ve ~h e sa m e ex pe rtet h-
Be~aus-=: th e s1 t1o n to ch aJ Je ng e th e ex pe rt
's m
· he /sh e 1s no
_ t 1n t~ e po
ods an d as su m pt io ns .
to
e st an da rd s ta te s th at th e au di to r w ill n ·e ed ds
Ho we ve r, th ih e as su m pt io ns an d
m 'et h~
de rs ta nd in g of
_obtain an un
w he th er th ey .a re ap pr op ri at e an d re a-
used an d to co ns id er . kn ow le dg e of th e en tit y" s bu si -
is /h er
sonable, ba se d -o n ,h
he r pr oc ed ur es .
~ess an d th e re su lt s of ot
.th e ex pe rt 's fi nd in gs
co r-
co rr ~c t be ca us e, if
id -:
Answer A is in em en t as se rt io ns be in g co ns
fi na nc ia l st at
roborate th e on ab Jy co nc lu de th at ~u ~c
ie nt
ud it or m ay re a~ _
ered, th e .a en ob ta in ed .
s be
ap pr op ria te ev id en ce ha
rr ec t be ca us e th e au di to r, -th ~ en ti -
Answers Can d D ar e in co
rt sh ou ld ha ve an un de rs ta nd in g ab ou t th e
ty, an d th e ex pe th e w or k to be pe rf o~ ed .
d ob je ct iv e 0£
nature, sc op e, an
,
CPA EXAM/NA no_N REVIEWER: AUDITING
~o : ~,
65. Which of the following Is not an 'expert upon Whose
auditor may rely? Wo~ a
A. An actuary. ·
e. An fndfvldual with expertise in complex mOdelln
purpose of valuing financial instruments. 9 for ~e
c. An expert In taxation law.
o. An individual with ~pertise In applying methocts
. counting for deferred lncome·tax. - Of ac~
66. If the '7SUlts: of. the expert's '\york·do not provide suffj ·
app~opn_ate aud1~ evidence or ~re not consistent with
audit evidence, the auditor should
!~
· vu~
A. Report matter to·the appropriate regulatory agen
of .the government. · cy
B. Resolve the matter.
C. Withdraw from the engagement.
D. Express an unmodified opinion with reference to the
w~rk of the expert.
n ific a n t c o m ponent
C. S ig
G ro u p m a n a gement th a t indude the
D. e n ts
m
t are ta/lea
ta te
In P S A 6 0 0 financial s o m p o n e n
70. As use d
fo rm a ti o n ~ f m o re than on e c
financial In l s ta tements
e n t fl n a n d a
A. Compon
p fi n a n c ia l ~ te m e n ts
B. Gro u
d fi n a n d a l s ta tements
C. Consolidate ncial statements
fina
D. Common e r p e rs o n in the ffrm
th
_ _ is th e partner or o n g a g e m ent and lts
The _ _ u d it e
71.
s p o n s ib le fo r t;t,e .group a port on the group ff. _
who is re th e auditor's re
, a n d fo r lf o f th e firm.
performance e h a .
d on b
l s ta te m e n ts that Is. issue
nan d a .
__
m e n t p a rtn e r
A~ Engage e n g a g e m e nt partner
n t
B. Compone
c. Princpipaelnaguagdeitomrent partner
D. Grou u nd e rs tanding
ta in a n
e n g a g e m e n t team shall ob
72. The group
nt to
that is -suftide ti~ c a t;o n o f c omponents
rm ? ' re v is e its .-Initial iden .
_
I._Con fi ·significant.
that a re lik e ly to b e
m e n t o f th e group
th e o f m a te
terial missta fraud or error.
n. : 5 s ~ statements, whether due to
ri s k s
manaal
A. I_only - .
B. II only
I
C. Both I and I
r II
D. Neither I no .
u p en g a g e m -.
to re q u e s t a comp<r_
73. I f the gro
nent a u d ito r to p e rfo
rm
e n t team plans
fi na n
work on the team shall obtain an
c ia l In fo rmation of
e n t th e
a compo n
g o f g ro u p e ngagement
understandin
4 The FlnancfaJ Statement Audit Client Acceptance and Planning 233
ct4P're~
J. Whether the component ~Udltor understands and will
comply with the ethical ·requ_lrements that are relevant.
to the group audit and, kl Particular, Is Independent.
JI. -n,e cdnponent-auditor's professional competence.
• I
A ronly
· II only
iD, Nefther
eoth I and II
I nor II
74, . ect'. .
,A,.,co~ .
· Which of the fol~owing statemdnts concerning group audits. is
.
n,e group engag~ment team has the responslblttty to es-
' tablish an overall group audit strategy and audit plan.
determine the materi-
8 The group engagement team shall
.· ality for the group flnancia'I statements as a whole when
establishing the overall group audit strategy.
.·c. The compof)ent engagement partner ··shall review the
- overall group·audit str~tegy -and group audit plan.
the terms
0, The group engagement partner shall agree on
of the group audit engage~ent In accordance·'With PSA
210.
57. A
8. A 33. A 58. A
9. C 34. . A 59. B
10. A 35. C· 60. · D
11. A 36. D 61. A
12. A 37; C, 62. B
13., A 38. D 63. C
14. C 39. C 64. B
. 15." C 40. D 65. D
16. D· 41. B 66. B
17. A 42. D 67. . i>
18. A -43. A 68. C ·
I