6643-Article Text-13426-1-10-20150815
6643-Article Text-13426-1-10-20150815
6643-Article Text-13426-1-10-20150815
http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej
Prodi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
Alamat korespondensi: ISSN 2087-0108
Kampus Unnes Bendan Ngisor, Semarang, 50233
E-mail: pps@unnes.ac.id
46
Miftah Nindya Rahmawati / English Education Journal 4 (1) (2014)
47
Miftah Nindya Rahmawati / English Education Journal 4 (1) (2014)
the language which is used tends to be seems linear and transparent, it is difficult because
standardized. Thirdly, most of the students often of its many steps. It also involves such things as
say that lack of grammatical knowledge is source backshift, which requires L2 students to know the
of their failures in constructing or completing tense that is “one back” from the tense in the
sentences in a text. Indonesian and English quoted speech sentence and to know how to shift
grammar are much different in the rules. within the pronoun paradigm and the adverb
Based on the problems above, it is an urgent system.”
need to implement teaching technique that can Indirect speech includes many types of
solve the problems. To solve the problems, the grammar text and the changing of elements such as
writer conducted an action research. In this study, pronouns, verbs, and adverbs from the quoted
the writer implemented the interesting technique speech sentences. So, it needs a lot of time and
of teaching grammar in writing using media practices to be skillful. Then, teacher plays an
picture. The appropriate pictures that were chosen important role to support students in grasping
were pictures of local story narrative text. Pictures enough of grammatical knowledge to construct
of local story narrative text could be interesting indirect speech in English. Then, one of the
and innovative media for teacher in teaching effective ways to foster it is by teaching them
grammar in writing. By using pictures, through practice. Ur (2009:19) defines practice as
Megawati&Anugerahwati (2012) state that the the rehearsal of certain behaviors with the
students are able to practice grammatical rules by objective of consolidating learning and improving
changing direct speech in the speech balloon into performance. In this case, the students should be
indirect speech. This kind of assessment can be provided with opportunities to practice the
used to measure grammatical measurement structures they are learning. Teachers get students
(Brown, 2003:226). to demonstrate the target behavior and then
Pictures of local story narrative text are monitor their performance. Harmer argues that
series of picture that told students about whatever the reason, teacher needs to help such
Indonesian cultural heritage stories. The writer students build the writing habit so that they
implemented these pictures of local story narrative recognize writing as being a normal part of
text that were completed with dialogs in controlled classroom practice and they come to writing tasks
writing. Controlled writing was to present some with as much enthusiasm as they do other
paragraphs to students in which they had to alter activities (2007:329
dialogues that follow pictures of local story
narrative text into required structures or grammar METHOD
throughout. In this research, the writer used
narrative text and indirect speech as grammar Having conducted preliminary research to
which were controlled. Narrative was chosen identify the problems, the researcher carried out a
because it was one of text kinds which was taught classroom action research at twelfth grade
in the twelfth grader. And then, indirect speech students of science program in SMA Negeri 1
was chosen because its existence could not be Pabelan Semarang regency which had 26 students.
separated from narrative text. They are closely The aim of action research was to solve the
interconnected.. Converting direct speech into problems faced by the students in the teaching and
indirect speech is considered something learning process in the classroom and to make
complicated for students. It is like what Cray in Liu improvement of the practice which lead to the
& Master (2003:19) states that, “Though the rule positive change.
48
Miftah Nindya Rahmawati / English Education Journal 4 (1) (2014)
49
Miftah Nindya Rahmawati / English Education Journal 4 (1) (2014)
applying the rules. In meeting 2 of each cycle, the because the result was not in the criterion of
teacher gave student a project to know about success. It was because the average score of all
student’s ability in mastering the rules using students was still under the minimum passing
pictures of local story narrative text. The criterion, 75 and only three students were above
researcher provided some pictures of local story the minimum passing criterion, 75. This meant
narrative text which were modified using speech that the teaching learning process by using of
balloons. The direct speech was written in speech pictures of local story narrative text to improve
balloon. The students were given instruction to students’ indirect speech practice in writing
change the direct speech in the speech balloons narrative text had not made a significant
into indirect speech. Then the indirect speech that improvement yet.
they produced must be filled into the incomplete The further analysis revealed that most of
sentence of the story passage which followed the students had still lack of knowledge of grammar in
pictures. changing direct speech into indirect speech. They
had mistakes in pronoun and spatial deixis.
Cycle 1 However, the mistakes of temporal deixis
In the first meeting the result of observation dominated. The researcher found most students
showed that the teaching learning process ran still had a lot of difficulties when they should apply
fluently. The action plan worked well. However, a set of backshifts from present tense to past tense
based on the result of observation checklist, the and from past tense into past perfect tense. Most
students’ involvements had not resulted in students also still failed to change direct speech
expected outcome. Generally, the students were into indirect speech in statement, question and
not cooperative in the teaching learning process. command. The researcher and the collaborator
Many students did not give good responses when also found that students had problems with
the teacher gave motivation and told the learning pronoun, adverb of time, adjective, auxiliary, and
objective to the class. From the analysis of the regular-irregular verb.
result of observation checklist in the cycle 1 in the
first meeting the researcher and the collaborator Cycle 2
got, the fact showed that the students’ activities When the observation checklist was
during the teaching and learning process were not conducted in the first meeting in cycle 2, the
in the criterion of success. Most of students were collaborator observed the students had seemed to
not active yet in every learning activity. involve and participate seriously and actively in
After a little review was given, the the teaching learning process. Most of students
researcher and the collaborator distributed the had paid attention well when the teacher
pictures of local story narrative text which had presented the materials. They had showed big
been completed with indirect speech in the speech interest in the subject taught. In the middle of
balloon. Some instructions were given before the explanation, many students even were eager to
students practiced to produce indirect speech. The make interruptions to get better understanding.
result of the students’ practice project showed an They also wanted and asked the teacher to give
improvement compared with the pre-cycle. The more examples in order to reduce their confusion.
average score of the result of students’ practice in Briefly, the students gave positive responses to the
pre-cycle was 41.7. While the average score of the teaching learning activities. From the analysis of
result of students’ practice in cycle 1 is 51.4. the result of observation checklist in the cycle 2 in
Nevertheless, the researcher was not satisfied the second meeting, the researcher and the
50
Miftah Nindya Rahmawati / English Education Journal 4 (1) (2014)
collaborator got the fact that the students’ participation in all learning activities. All learning
activities during the teaching and learning process activities had met the criterion of success. The
had improved. The students had tried to do their percentage of the students’ involvement achieved
practice projects seriously. Most of them had self not less than 85%.
confidence to finish their practice projects by In the second meeting, it could be seen that
themselves. the students’ activities during the teaching and
From the result of students’ scores, there learning process using pictures of local story
was a significant improvement for the average narrative text had also resulted in expected
score. It was higher than the average score in cycle outcome. In doing the practice projects, the
1. The average score in cycle 1 was 51.4 while the students’ behavioral changes were in the category
average score in cycle 2 was 69.3. Nevertheless, very good. Not less than 85% of all students had
the researcher and the collaborator were satisfied showed very good behavior. This finding showed
enough yet with the score results. It was because that the students’ behavior change had met the
the average score and the students’ scores did not criterion of success.
meet the criterion of success, 75. The further
analysis revealed that most of students had still CONCLUSION
lack of knowledge of grammar in changing direct
speech into indirect speech. They had a lot of In conclusion, the twelfth graders of science
mistakes in pronoun deixis, the use of yes-no and program of SMA Negeri 1 Pabelan, Semarang
wh- question, adjective, and to infinitive. In cycle 2, regency in the academic year of 2012/2013 had
most of students gave positive comments about some problems when they produced indirect
the practice project. They stated that the practice speech in writing narrative text. Most of students
project was a nice study, easy, interesting, and a got some difficulties in pronoun deixis, spatial
good job. They liked it. Some of them said that the deixis, and mainly in temporal deixis. Pronoun
practice project made them happy, gave them good deixis was a number of adjustments in the
experiences, and made their English better. It reference of first and second person pronouns.
meant, during cycle 2, the students could enjoy the Many students still also had difficulties in using
learning process than during cycle 1. personal pronouns (subject and object), possessive
Based on the analysis, it was found that the adjectives (my, your, his, her, its, our, and their),
implementation of the strategy had improved possessive pronouns (mine, yours, his/hers, ours,
significantly. However, the researcher and the yours, theirs), and reflective pronouns (myself,
collaborator still were not satisfied with the results yourself, himself, herself, itself, ourselves,
because the knowledge of indirect speech themselves). Spatial deixis was the shift of pointer
grammatical rules that the student had was still words like this, now, here and tomorrow that
low. not met all the criterion of success yet. should be changed into that, there, the next day,
Considering those the findings in cycle 2, the and so on. While temporal deixis was the
researcher and the collaborator decided to movement from direct quotation to indirect
continue to the next cycle. quotation that involves a surprisingly elaborate set
of backshifts from present tense to past tense and
Cycle 3 past tense to past perfect tense.
When the observation checklist was The implementation of pictures of local
conducted in the first meeting in cycle 3, the result story narrative text to improve the students’
showed that most students had positive and active indirect speech practice in writing narrative text
51
Miftah Nindya Rahmawati / English Education Journal 4 (1) (2014)
was generally divided into two main learning got identification of the strengths, weaknesses and
phases. Firstly, the students were given knowledge suggestions concerning about the setting of the
about indirect speech. The students were involved class, the interaction between the teacher and
and encouraged in number of learning activities to students, and other things that happened in the
listen attentively when the teacher gave class during the teaching learning process. In the
explanation about indirect speech, to make product, the results of students’ projects showed
interruption when they needed to get clearest that the achievement of the students was getting
explanation, to ask questions when they were not improved from cycle to cycle. The improvement of
clear enough, and to request some more examples the students’ scores had met the criteria of success.
to get better understanding. Secondly, the students Therefore, the researcher could conclude that
were given pictures of local story narrative text pictures of local story narrative text could be used
which were completed by direct speech in the as media to teach grammar in writing skill.
speech balloon. In this phase, the students were
practiced to convert the indirect speech in the
REFERENCES
speech balloon into indirect speech.
The results of the implementation of Broughton, Geoffrey. et al. 2003. Teaching English as a Foreign
pictures of local story narrative text to practice Language Second Edition. London & New York: the
indirect speech in this study showed that the Taylor & Francis e-Library.
Brown, H. Douglas. 2003. Language Assessment. New York:
students’ ability improved during the cycle per
Longman.
cycle was conducted. In the process, the students’ Cameron, L. 2001. Teaching Language to Young Learners.
behavior also had a tendency in getting better and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
better from the first action up to the last action. Harmer, Jeremy. 2007. The Practice of English Language
Teaching fourth edition. Harlow: Pearson Education
The students had positive responses and they were
Limited.
motivated during the action. It could be seen from Kern, R. 2000. Literacy and Language Teaching. New York:
the results of the observation checklist, field note, Oxford Univrsity Press.
questionnaire, and students’ journal. Liu, Dilin. Master, Peter. Ed. 2003. Grammar Teaching in
Teacher Education. USA: Teachers of English to
Based on the information of observation
Speakers of Other Languages, Inc. (TESOL).
checklist, it was found that the students were Megawati, Fika, and Anugerahwati, Mirjam. (2012). Comic
active and motivated during the teaching learning Strips: A Study on the Teaching of Writing Narrative
process. Observation checklists indicated that Texts to Indonesian EFL Students. TEFLIN Journal,
Volume 23, Number 2, July 2012.
most of the students got involved well in each
Murcia, Marianne Celce. 2001. Teaching English as a Second or
activity. In relation to the students’ attitude which Foreign Language. New York: Heinle & Heinle.
was shown from their response in questionnaire, Richards, J.C & Renandya, W. A. 2000. Methodology in Language
the researcher found that most students gave Teaching – An Anthology of Current Practice. New
South West: Cambridge University Press
positive response to the effect that they felt after
Thornbury, Scott. 1999. How to Teach Grammar. London:
experiencing teaching and learning process using Pearson Education Limited.
pictures of local story narrative text to improve Ur, Penny. 2009. A course in Language Teaching: Practice and
their indirect speech practice. While from the Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52