Collective Bargainig
Collective Bargainig
Collective Bargainig
SEMINAR ON
COLLECTIVE BARGAINING
AND
CONFLICT MANAGEMENT
SUBMITTED TO SUBMITTED BY
Thrissur Thrissur
A lot of views have been expressed about collective bargaining. Collective bargaining
was a means of institutionalizing and containing conflict. In the earlier stages of the industrial
revolution when work places were smaller it was easier to contain conflict. According to Taylor,
the worker does not possess creative ability let alone intelligence and wisdom. The elements of
human oriented management systems which promotes sound conflict resolution such as
communication, consultation and participation, found no place in the theory. This concept of
management can be seen as an idea breeding ground for conflict resolution system rather than
cooperation. Thus, the hallmarks of organizations based on this model are centralized and clear
lines of authority and responsibility, and close supervision. Matters relating to collective
bargaining and conflict resolution are often seen as very crucial because this organization
comprises of various groups of people who come together under this umbrella but have diverse
interest and needs to satisfy.
COLLECTIVE BARGAINING
INTRODUCTION
Collective bargaining involves discussion between two groups as to the terms and
condition of employment it is called collective because the employer and the employee act as
group rather than as individuals .it is known as bargaining because the method of teaching and
agreement involves proposals , counter proposals ,offer and counter offers and other negotiation.
Much more essential to the nurses is assuring that they have a safe environment for
practice, free of mandatory overtime and other work issues, and a voice in the resource allocation
decisions that affect their ability to achieve quality health outcomes for patients". Control over
practice, flexible scheduling and a collegial environment are viewed as essential to a quality
work life for professional nurses. Nurse activities not that finding processes, structures and
methods, such as collective bargaining, may offer nurses control over practice. This control is
crucial to the survival of professional nursing in the face Of an acute nursing short age crisis.
MEANING
The phrase collective bargaining is said to be coined by Sydney and Beatrice Webb and
Great Britain. It is made up from two words collective which means “group” and bargaining
which means “proposals and counter proposals”.
Collective bargaining aims to reach a collective agreement which usually sets out issues
such as employees pay, working hours, training, health and safety, and rights to participate in
workplace or company affairs.
DEFINITIONS
“Collective bargaining is the term used to describe a situation in which the essential
conditions of employment are determined by bargaining process undertaken by representatives
of a group of workers on the one hand and of one or more employers on the other.”
Dale Yoder
Filippo
Collective bargaining is the "Process by which organized employees participate with their
employers in decisions about their rates of pay, hours of work, and other terms and conditions of
employments".
Collective bargaining is the means by which professional nurse can influence hospital
nursing care delivery systems and labour management relations through a united voice.
Collective bargaining may defined as "Activities occurring between organized labour and
management that concern employee relations. Such activities include negotiation of formal legal
agreements and day to day interaction between unions and management".
Collective bargaining is the way by which employee redress their grievances and asks the
employer to fulfill their needs. By this strikes can be avoided.
ILO
Collective bargaining involves discussions and negotiations between two groups as to the
terms and conditions of employment. It is called 'collective' because both the employer & the
employee act as a group rather than as individuals. It is known as bargaining, because the method
of reaching an agreement involves proposals, counter proposals, offers & counter offers and
other negotiations.
Tudwig Teller
Collective bargaining is a procedure by which the terms and conditions of worker are
regulated by agreements their bargaining agents and employers.
Negotiation
Collective
Bargaining
EVOLUTION OF COLLECTIVE BARGAINING
The term of “Collective Bargaining” was first used in 1891 by Beatrics Webb, a founder
of field if industrial relation in Britain. It refers to a sort of collective of negotiation and
agreement that has existed.
The concept of collective bargaining was introduced very late in India as trade unions
were found only in 20th century.
In the year 1913: The California legislature extended the eight hour law to pupil nurses.
1941 – California State Nurses Association represented nurses concerns before the labor board.
1946 – The California nurses association became the first Nurses Association to represent nurses.
The main purpose of collective is the of industrial disputes or conflicts relating to wages.
It harmonizes labour relations.
It promotes industrial enterprise B2ace by creating equality of bargaining power between
the labour and management.
It improves working conditions.
It prevents workers from getting into unfair treatment.
Collective: Collective bargaining is a two way group process where the employers
representative and employees representatives sit together to negotiate terms of employment.
Strength: Both the parties in collective bargaining are strong and equal.
Voluntary: Both parties come to the negotiation table voluntarily in order to go in particular
negotiation. It is based on discussion, mutual trust and understanding.
Formal: It is a formal process in which certain employment related issues are to be regulated at
national, organization and workplace levels.
Dynamic: Collective bargaining is dynamic, that go on changing over a period and grows and
expand the way of agreement, the way of implementation and way of discussion.
Bipartite Process: Because the employee and employers representatives negotiate directly
face to face across the table.
2. Collective bargaining is a democratic and pragmatic method of regulating the terms and
conditions of employment .here parties are directly concerned with problems related to issues of
their industry .whether it is health industry or any other enterprise.
3. Collective bargaining provides flexible means of adjusting wage structure and physical
facilities provided by the employer .both parties can meet any time to solve the problems faced
by the employers and employees of an institution with democratic way.
Importance to employees
Collective bargaining helps the employees from the exploitation of employer .rights of
both parties are saved with mutual understanding.
Collective bargaining develops a sense of self respect and responsibility among the
employees.
It increases the strength of the workforce, thereby, increasing their bargaining capacity as
a group.
Collective bargaining increases the morale and productivity of employees.
It restricts management’s freedom for arbitrary action against the employees. Moreover,
unilateral actions by the employer are also discouraged.
Effective collective bargaining machinery strengthens the trade unions movement.
Importance to employers
It helps in motivating the employers that leads to more production and achieving the laid
down objective of any organization.
It becomes easier for the management to resolve issues at the bargaining level rather than
taking up complaints of individual workers.
p
m
C
y
c
d
o
P
a
g
n
I
e
v
u
b
tr
is
D Collective bargaining tends to promote a sense of job security among employees and
thereby tends to reduce the cost of labor turnover to management.
Collective bargaining opens up the channel of communication between the workers and
the management and increases worker participation in decision making.
Collective bargaining plays a vital role in settling and preventing industrial disputes.
Importance to society
Conjunctive bargaining is the most common type of bargaining & involves zero-sum
negotiations, in other words, one side wins and the other loses.
This involves bargaining over the distribution of surplus. In this, economic issues like
salaries, wages and bonuses are discussed.
One party’s gain is another party’s loss.
More competitive.
e.g. Unions negotiate for maximum wages
Integrative bargaining is similar to problem solving sessions in which both sides are
trying to reach a mutually beneficial alternative, i.e. a win-win situation.
Both parties may gain or neither party losses.
Both the parties are trying to make more of something.
PRODUCTIVITY BARGAINING:
COMPOSITE BARGAINING
1. National level
2. Sectorial bargaining
3. Company level
1. The management should be waiting for the trade union to bring employees grievances to
its notice but should rather create the condition in which the employees can approach
themselves without involving the trade union.
2. The management should only deal with the one trade in the organization.
3. They must form and follow a realistic labor policy
4. They should treat the trade union fairly
5. They should regularly check the rules and regulations to determine the attitude and
comfort of its employees
6. Must agree to reform the trade union without any reservations
7. The management should not wait for the trade union to bring employees problems
1. The trade union should eliminate racketeering and other undemocratic practices within
their own organization
2. Trade union leaders should resort to strike only when all other methods of the settlement
of a dispute have failed
3. Trade union leaders should not imagine that their only function is to secure higher wages,
shorter hours of work and better working conditions for their members.
4. Trade union leaders should assist in the removal of such restrictive rules and regulations
that are likely to increase costs and prices and reduce the amount that can be paid out as
wages
Be sure to set clear objectives for every bargaining item, and be sure you understand the
reason for each.
Do not hurry.
When in doubt, discuss with your associates.
Be well prepared with firm data supporting your position.
Always strive to keep some flexibility in your position.
Don't concern yourself just with what the other party says and does; find out why.
Respect the importance for face saving for the other party.
Be alert to the real intentions of the other party-not only for goals, but also for priorities.
Be a good listener.
Build a reputation for being fair but firm.
Learn to control your emotions and use them as a tool.
As you make each bargaining move, be sure you know its relationship to all other moves.
Measure each move against your objectives.
Pay close attention to the wording of every clause negotiated; they are often a source of
grievances.
Remember that collective bargaining is a compromise process; There is no such thing as
having all the pie.
Try to understand people and their personalities.
Consider the impact of present negotiations on those in future years.
COLLECTIVE BARGAINING MEMBERS
Registered Nurses
Physicians
Other Professionals
Technical Employees
Non Professionals
Engage in concerted activities and mutual aid refrain (avoid doing) from any of the activities
Refusing to bargain with the union that is the lawful representative of its employees.
The process of collective bargain involves negotiation and the management and union. It
is a complex involving a number of procedures, techniques and tools. Once nurses have decided
to pursue collective bargaining when there is no alternative for them. The general process is as
follows.
1. An organization committee is formed with well known and respected members which
2. The committee does research to obtain extensive knowledge of all facts of the institution
4. Possible employer facts are identified and discussed and specific strategies are developed
to manage them.
6. A structural plan is made, including adoption of a set of bylaws and election of officers.
8. An election is held in which nurse’s vote for or against a collective bargaining unit.
10. A contract is negotiated. Members of the bargaining committee should survey the
membership to gather data for contract proposals. At the first bargaining meeting
E
is
D
P
a
tB
e
rS
F
fo
n
y
u
h
p
lz
m
g
c proposals are made. The easiest one should be settled first. Debriefing at the end of each
session are helpful. The team should respond to management with care, spirit and no
unconditional concessions.
11. When all proposals have fully discussed agreed on, the contract is written.
12. The contract is then presented to union members who vote to ratify or reject. If accepted
13. The contract is enforced through grievance and arbitarian procedures. It is reviewed or
PREPARATORY PHASE
In this phase following activities are carried out:
DISCUSSION PHASE
BARGAINING PHASE
Problem-solving
Proposals are set forth
SETTLEMENT PHASE
OBSTACLES
There are four major issues in nursing in regard with collective bargaining:
Whether it is professional?
Which organization/associations represent nurses at the bargaining table?
Whether to join union?
What is the role of nurse administrator to the right to bargain collectively?
There are many reasons, the nurses start bargaining collectively: the working conditions
and safety, wages, salary, autonomy, staffing, benefits, cadre, promotions, etc. Job dissatisfaction
is also reported as a precursor to increased union activities. Whereas the common subject matters
of collective bargaining in the government sectors are; Union recognition and scope of
bargaining; management rights: union security; strikes and lockouts; activities and
responsibilities; wages, working conditions; job rights and seniority; discipline, promotions;
grievances handling; health and safety etc. This can be at the organizational level, local, state and
national level. In India, nurses have the associations at the national, state and local level in
service side as well teaching side. The committees are also formulated to discuss the issues like
cadre, staffing, working conditions.
Thus traditionally wages and working conditions have the primary focus of collective
bargaining. But in the recent time the process of bargaining has been extended to almost all of
employee-employer relations, covering a large area. The major issues dealt with in collective
bargaining are broadly categorized as below:
Wage related issues: These include topics like how basic wage rates are determined, cost of
living adjustments, wage differentials, overtime rates, wage adjustments etc.
Supplementary economic benefits: These include issues as pension plans, paid vacations, paid
holidays, health insurance plans, dismissal plans, supplementary unemployment benefits etc.
Institutional Issues: This consists of rights & duties of employers, employees & unions,
including union security, check off procedures, quality of work-life program etc.
Administrative Issues: These include issues such as seniority, employee discipline and discharge
procedure, employee health & safety, technological changes, work rules, job security and
training, attendance, leave etc.
Absence of reporting unsafe or poor patient care (quality of patient care is primary issue)
Short staffing and improper skill mix to correspond to patient acuity
Floating without orientation and training
Use of temporary personnel and unlicensed personnel
Resistance of employers to accept joint decision-making
Adversial relationship between nurse and management and exploitation of nurses by
management
Lack of respect for employee
Lack of promotional opportunities
Lack of staff development and continuing education opportunities
Poor differentials for shift work, education and experience
Poor management and poor communication
Lack of career ladders
Mandatory and Voluntary overtime
Use of temporary nurses
Acuity-based staffing systems.
Protection from reassignments and mandated non nursing duties.
Provision for work orientation and continuing education.
Health and safety provisions, such as free Hepatitis 'B' vaccine.
"Just cause" language for discipline and termination.
Provisions for nursing and multi disciplinary practice committees.
1. Identify mandatory, voluntary, and illegal collective bargaining issues and common economic
and non-economic reasons behind bargaining.
2. Describe how managers should prepare for collective bargaining, choose a negotiation team,
and select a bargaining strategy.
3. Differentiate between mediation and arbitration and explain how they may affect negotiations.
4. Describe the role of strikes in collective bargaining, define various types of strikes, and outline
possible management responses to strikes.
5. Identify major sources of grievances, describe typical grievance procedures, and outline how
to prevent grievances in union properties.
6. Explain how non-union properties can address grievance procedures.
There are some conditions which are essential for the success of collective bargaining
Unwillingness
Changing position
Delaying tactics
Withdrawal of concessions
Unilateral actions
Refusal
Leadership for unions may be difficult to obtain because many professional nurses have
CONCLUSION
The nursing personnel and managers are the ones responsible for the problem. The lack
of leadership skills is one major factor. In order to solve the problems, focus should be given to
the nursing leaders and managers. Leadership training programmes should be offered and
nursing managers and leaders should require attending. These managers and leaders in turn
should perform their responsibilities of teaching and guiding the rest of the staff in promoting a
health work environment.
CONFLICT MANAGEMENT
INTRODUCTION
Organizational conflict often results when there is disagreement between two or more
individuals in an organization. Organizational conflict is a term referring to conflict within an
organization. Conflict is opposition or disagreement between individuals or entities.
Early definitions of conflict had focused on a wide variety of different phenomena (Mack
and Snyder, 1957; Fink, 1968). Pondy (1967) had sorted these definitions into several categories:
antecedent conditions, emotions, perceptions and behaviors.
Conflict may be defined as a struggle or contest between people with opposing needs,
ideas, beliefs, values, or goals. Conflict might escalate and lead to nonproductive results, or
conflict can be beneficially resolved and lead to quality final products.
“A process that begins when one party perceives that another party has negatively
affected, or is about to negatively affects something the first party cares about”
Conflict is described as a social situation where two parties struggle with one another due
to incompatibilities in perspectives, beliefs, goals, or values; this struggle impedes the
achievement of predetermined goals or objectives.
Conflict is neither good, nor bad, it just is! (Marshall, 2006). It can occur at any time and
in any place, originating between two individuals or groups when there is a disagreement or
difference in their values, attitudes, needs, or expectations (Conerly, 2004). Organizational
conflict can be caused by poor communication among healthcare providers.
It is generally agreed that conflicts are inevitable and need to be managed to avoid
negative impacts on the individual or organization. When characterized by a process of
cooperation and joint resolution, conflict can create a diverse environment that fosters growth
and improves relationships.
Pondy's model of organizational conflict highlights five main steps of conflict progression. These
are:
1. Latent conflict; or the existence of an underlying source of conflict
4. Manifest conflict where one or more parties engage in covert or overt behaviour to
bring about the conflict
5. Conflict aftermath where the issues are dealt with satisfactorily and the issue resolves.
During this stage no conflict is present, but the potential for conflict exists due to several
sources. These are five sources or conditions that provide potential for conflict: interdependence,
difference in goals and priorities, Bureaucratic factors, Incompatible performance criteria,
Competition for scarce resources.
Interdependence:
As organizations grow and differentiate, subunits want autonomy. Desires for autonomy
conflict with the organizations aspirations for cooperation. As task interdependence increases the
potential for conflict increases. Conflict occurs at the individual, functional, and divisional
levels. If functions were not interdependent, conflict would not exist.
These exist among different functions that have different goals and priorities the goals
and priorities the goals and priorities if not match, create conflicts among functional
departments.
Bureaucratic factors
Line functions often clash with staff functions. Conflict arises when line employees
consider themselves more important than staff employees, putting their own interests first.
It leads to conflict. Increased funding allows a division to grow but due to scance
resources, there is difficulty in achieving goals this arising conflicts.
One or more unit/parties aware of conflict and begin to analyze it. When a unit perceives
its goals to be obstructed, conflict enters the second stage. Each group seeks the source of the
conflict and finds reasons for problems.
Units respond emotionally to each other, and attitudes polarize into 'us-versus-them'.
Anger, frustration, hostility prevails with each other. In this stage cooperation between units
decrease and small problem escalates into huge conflict. Thus the organizational effectiveness
declines.
Units try to get back at each other. There is fighting and open aggression as well passive
aggression. There is exhibition of adversarial behavior. That is apathy, rigid rules adherence,
violence and that leads to organizational ineffectiveness. Managers should prevent conflict from
reaching the manifest stage to avoid a communication breakdown and a poor conflict aftermath.
Conflict is resolved in some way. If sources of conflict are not removed, the dispute will
arise again. If resolved before the manifest stage, conflict will result in a positive aftermath. If
conflict resolution takes a long time or doesn't occur, future relationships and the organizational
culture will be damaged.
STEPHEN P ROBBINS MODEL
Stephen P Robbins describes five stages of conflict, starting with the potential opposition
and ending with the outcome.
Emergence
During this stage, the conditions for conflict arise and a potential conflict becomes one.
This is divided into two sequential stages. If one party is negatively affected by these conditions
enough to respond to them, the conflict actualizes into 'cognition and personalization' stage.
Escalation
During this stage the parties involved begin exhibiting behaviors in direct opposition to
the opponent's perceived intentions, such as competitive statements and avoidance tactics. At this
point, a conflict can become 'institutionalized' if the parties continue to view each other as
adversaries and perpetuate their perceptions of the other person's identity based on that person's
position in the conflict.
Crisis
Negotiation
Once both parties in a conflict recognize their emotional intensity and attachments soften
and their willingness grows to hear the other party out. At this point, the situation reaches the 'de-
escalation' stage and the possibility for some sort of settlement emerges. Strategies such as
compromise and bargaining take place in this stage.
A process model of conflict developed by Cadotte and Stern (1979) describes five critical
elements of conflict: conflict potential, dependence (and its inversely related condition of
power), conflict perception, resultant force, and conflict aftermath. The process aspect of any
system is the temporal sequence of events which occur as the system operates, e.g. the mental
and behavioral activities of the conflicting parties.
Conflict Potential
Conflict potential is the extent that the actions of one party are likely to (or perceived to)
hinder goal attainment of the other.
The level of dependence of one party with another is determined by the value of the
inputs invested in the relationship. The level of power is inversely related to the level of
dependence between the parties.
Conflict Perception
Conflict perception is one party's judgment of whether or not the other party is interfering
with attainment of its goals. The conflict exits if there is an actual disagreement or dispute.
Resultant Force
Resultant force is the pressure that one party uses to persuade the other to change its
goals, objectives, and perceptions of reality in order to meet its own desires. It may be either
coercive or non-coercive. Coercive pressure frequently causes more disruption in the relationship
than does non-coercive pressure.
Conflict Aftermath
It is the outcome of the conflict resolution and directs future interactions between the
organizations. This model also incorporates a feedback mechanism by which future conflict
episodes are flavored or influenced by previous conflict resolution results.
STRUCTURAL MODEL
The structural aspects of a system are the broader system 'parameters'. For example,
norms, incentive structures and standardized procedures are some of a social system's structural
features which its conflict process. The structural model identified four different classes of
variables:
There are four types of organizational conflict: interpersonal conflict, intra group conflict,
intergroup conflict and inter organizational conflict.
Interpersonal Conflict
Intergroup Conflict
Intergroup conflict is the conflict between different groups, teams and departments.
These types of conflicts on the content and the goals of the work, and process conflicts
focused on how tasks would be accomplished.
Process Conflict
This type of conflict appears to have a direct negative relationship with group
performance: Low levels of process conflict are positively related to performance, while higher
levels are increasingly detrimental to group performance. Process conflicts could be solved
easily by consulting a procedure manual or a group supervisor.
DIMENSIONS OF CONFLICT
The dimensions of organizational conflicts are negative emotionality, importance,
acceptability, and resolution potential. Each of these dimensions applies to all types of conflict.
Negative Emotionality
The dimension of emotionality refers to the amount of negative affect exhibited and felt
during the conflict. It is associated with poor group performance and low member satisfaction.
Emotion includes anger, which includes anger, frustration, uneasiness, discomfort, tenseness,
resentment, annoyance, irritation, fury, rage.
Importance
Other predictors of group performance, beyond the frequency or number of times conflict
episodes occur within groups, are the size or scope of a conflict and its duration. It enhanced
conflict's effects. If the issue is of great importance, it is vital to the life and success of the group.
The importance of the conflict enhanced its effects on performance, whether the effects were
positive or negative.
Acceptability
The acceptability dimension refers to group norms about conflict and communication.
Group norms are standards that guide group members' behavior. Acceptability norms increased
both the positive effect of constructive conflict and the negative effect of destructive conflict on
group performance and member satisfaction.
Resolution Potential
Resolution potential refers to the degree to which the conflict appears possible to resolve.
It positively influences the constructive effects of conflict on performance and satisfaction and
decrease the negative effect. The main determinants of whether a member perceive a conflict as
resolvable include characteristics of the members (e.g., past experience, personalities), group
structure (e.g., interdependence, leader involvement), and dimensions of conflict (importance,
emotionality, acceptability).
Conflicts are perceived as more serious when they involve larger numbers of people,
more events, or greater influence over future interactions.
ELEMENTS OF CONFLICT
A substantive message.
Interpersonal exchange relaying information about the relationship.
Emotions, feelings such as jealousy, hatred, anger, and frustration.
Stress and threat, which increase emotional responses and negative arousal.
There are a number of characteristics unique to healthcare that helps to generate conflict:
Due to complex adaptive system (CAS) of health care system, conflict usually occurs at
multiple levels at the same time.
The healthcare system involves the wide disparity of knowledge, and control experienced
by the various disciplines. While most conflicts involve some disparity between
disciplines.
The ethnic diversity of both consumers and providers of healthcare services.
Healthcare involves people interacting with other people involves issues about personal
or religious values.
Conflict resolution education and skills training should be part of all health care
professional programs and all health care facilities continuing education programs. Training
should include an overview of basic conflict principles and approaches, as well as practical skills
training in negotiation, mediation and facilitation. In addition, there are numerous publications
on conflict resolution skills and techniques that are easily accessible.
Seek first to understand, then to be understood. Active listening is the process whereby
we 'actively' work at hearing and understanding what the other person is saying. The listener
must take care to attend to the speaker fully, and then repeat, or reframe what he or she thinks the
speaker has said. In this way you ensure that you have fully understood the message the Other
person is trying to convey before you attempt to make the point you want to make.
Recognize that Men and Women have different Communications Styles and
Responses to Conflict
In the area of conflict resolution particularly, recent research has indicated that women do
not adopt the traditional 'flight or fight' response to stressful situations that we have been led to
believe is a universal response. Instead, women are more likely to 'Tend and Befriend.' Since the
vast majority of nurses are women it is helpful to understand how our biology may affect our
response to others.
In order to deal with the stress of everyday life, the following simple method of thinking
about others and situations may help to stay focused and positive in interactions with others.
A: Assume the positive about others and their behavior. Assume that they are reasonable and are
not trying to cause you grief or pain. Assume that if someone is difficult to deal with, that they
have something problematic going on in their life. Assume it is about them and not about you.
V: If you cannot assume the positive as in above, then you must validate the situation. Talk to
the individual and find out what is going on with them. Validate your negative assumptions
about the other person by talking directly to them.
1: If you are unable to assume the positive, and you are unable (or unwilling) to validate the
situation by talking to the individual, you must Ignore it and let it go.
D: If you cannot think positively, if you can't or won't validate, and if you can no longer ignore,
you must do something. Otherwise the stress of these unresolved situations will build up and
inevitably be detrimental to your health and the health of those around you.
Debrief the situation with a trusted friend and get their advice.
Discuss the situation and your response with a therapist.
Drink something healthy and calming, herbal tea may be a good choice.
Do introduce relaxing activities and techniques into your lifestyle. Try walking, hiking,
canoeing, yoga or other activities that are non competitive.
Do consider meditation as a way to become more self aware and positively focused.
Behavioral Approach
CONCLUSION
As long as organizations continue to use work teams, conflict cannot be avoided since it
is an inevitable aspect of work teams. Conflict is an outcome of behaviors. It is an integral part of
human life. Whenever there is interaction there is conflict. Conflict means expression of
hostility, negative attitudes, antagonism, aggression, rivalry, and misunderstanding. It is also
associated with situations that involve contradictory interest between two opposing groups. It can
be defined as a disagreement between two or more individuals or groups with each individual or
group trying to gain acceptance of its view over others.
RESEARCH STUDIES
Pittman J. Registered nurse job satisfaction and collective bargaining unit membership
status. Journal of Nursing Administration. 2007 Oct 1;37(10):471-6.
ABSTRACT
Objective:
To examine differences in job satisfaction levels between registered nurses who were or
were not members of a nursing collective bargaining unit.
Background:
The nursing shortage could lead to decreased quality of patient care, heavier workloads,
and mandatory overtime, resulting in decreased job satisfaction and increased intent to leave.
Nursing collective bargaining units use contracts to help decrease patient workload, decrease and
eliminate mandatory overtime, increase pay and benefits, and increase job security. Exploring
differences in job satisfaction between nurses who are and are not members of collective
bargaining units is pertinent to understanding the retention and recruitment of nurses.
Methods:
A descriptive secondary analysis using a survey database from the Minnesota Department
of Health. The survey, which included a job satisfaction section largely based on the Index of
Work Satisfaction, was sent in 2002 to 3,645 registered nurses in Minnesota.
Results:
Members of collective bargaining units had higher satisfaction with wages. Nonmembers
had higher satisfaction with nursing supervision, patient care, work setting, professional
relationships, and overall job satisfaction.
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT
Vati J. Principles and practice of nursing management and administration. New Delhi:
Jaypee brothers medical publishers ( P) Ltd; 2013.
Basavanthappa B T. Nursing Administration. 4th edition. New Delhi: brothers medical
publishers (P) Ltd; 2013.