This Content Downloaded From 195.114.150.19 On Sun, 03 Oct 2021 16:08:47 UTC
This Content Downloaded From 195.114.150.19 On Sun, 03 Oct 2021 16:08:47 UTC
This Content Downloaded From 195.114.150.19 On Sun, 03 Oct 2021 16:08:47 UTC
FRANKS
Author(s): Harold S. Snellgrove
Source: The Mississippi Quarterly , July 1954, Vol. 7, No. 4 (July 1954), pp. 1-10
Published by: The Johns Hopkins University Press
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
The Johns Hopkins University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and
extend access to The Mississippi Quarterly
by
Harold S„ Snellgrove
Introduction
Leprosy appears to have been present in Egypt and the ancient Near
East from early times. That it existed in Persia around the seventh century
B. C. is evident from the writings of the Greek historian, Herodotus, who
claimed:
That the disease was prevalent in ancient Mesopotamia is apparent from the
stone landmarks excavated there,6 and that it was to be found in Palestine is
gained from Biblical references, uncritical though some of them may be.7
James A. Tobey, Riders of the Plagues (New York, 1930),p.21. See also
Henry E. Siegrist. A History of Medicine, in progress, Vol. Is Primitive and
Archaic Medicine (New York, 1951), pp. 381,398.
7Among the Biblical references, attention may be called to Lev. xiiis46
and Num. vî1-4. Tlavius Josephus, "Antiquities of the Jews" in The Work of
Flavius Josephusp trans, by William Whitston, 2 vols, in one (Philadelphia,
1870), I, 311, comments of leprosy among the Jews. See also footnote 1 supra.
Q
Hippocrates and Galen have little to say of the disease. Cf. Cecelia
C. Mettler, History Of Medicine,Si. by Fred A. Mettler (Philadelphia, 1947
613-615.
13 n
Aulus Cornelius Celsus, De Medicina, trans, by W„ G«, Spencer, 2 vols.
(Cambridge, 1935), I, 342-345.
14
Caius Plinius Secundus (Pliny the Elder), Historia Naturalis XXXVII,
ed. by Gabriel Brotier, 6 vols. (Paris, 1779), Book xxviis Chapter 5.
150ribasius, op. Ctt.,VI, 197.
^Eusebius (of Caesarea), "Prologomena, Constantine the Great" in .45e
lect Library of Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church, ed.
by P. Schaff and H„ lace, second series, 13 vols. (New York, 1890-1900), II,
150.
By the middle of the sixth century, the number of lepers in Gaul must
have increased considerably; for a church council meeting at Orleans in No
vember 549 passed the ruling that priests should minister to lepers and give
them clothing. 21 Thirty-four years later at Lyons a provincial council ordered
that bishops should furnish food and clothing for lepers.22
25
Celsus, De Medicina, pp. 342-345.
*? ß
Cagsiu8 Telix, De Medtcina ex Graecis Logicae Sectae Auctoribus Liber
Translatus Sub Artabure et Calepio Consulibus, ed. by Valentin Rose (Leipzig,
1879), pp. 177-178.
27
Pliny the Elder, Historia Naturalis, Book xxv, Chapter 2.
28
Aretaeus of Cappadocia,On the Causes and Symptoms of Chronic Diseases,
iif 13,29 oited in Mettler, History of Medicine, PP« 243-244.
Marcellus Empiricus, De Medicamentis liber, ed. by George Helmreioh
(Leipzig, 1889), passim.
30
Vegitius Renatus, "Ars Veterninariae sive Mulomedicinae* in Scriptores
Rei Rustica Veteres Latini, 4 vols. (Bipontus, 1787), I, 236.
31
Aurelius jPrudentius, Opera Omnia, 3 vols. (London, 1824), I, 191.
320ribasius, Oeuvres, VI, 197.
33 1
Gregory of
of Nicene a
34
Sister Mary Emily Zeenan, "StoGregory of Nazianzus and ^arly Byzantine
Medicine" in Bulletin of the History of Medicine, (1941), pp. 17,18.
Evidently by the latter part of the sixth century, the words lepra and
elephantiasis were no longer being used interchangeably, for Saint Isidore of
Seville described each separately in his Etymologies. "In leprosy, " he says,
"the skin is covered with a roughness similar to scales, whence it takes its
name, whose color becomes black, then white, and then red. On the body of
man, leprosy is so diagnosed if at various times a different color appearsa
mongthe well parts of the skin, or if it is so diffused everywhere that it makes
the whole of the same defiled color, " 35 Elephantiasis, he states, "is called
a sickness from its similarity to elephants, whose hardness and toughness of
skin naturally gives the name to the sickness in men, because it makes the
surface of the body similar to the skin of elephants, or because the great
suffering brings forth the name. " 36
35
"S.Isidori Hispalensis Episcopi Etymologiarum Libri lV*in J. P. Migne,
Patrologiae Cursus Oompletus, Series Latina, LXXXII, 191-192.
36Loc. Oit.
37
Celsus9 De Medicina, 342-345»
38
Scribonius Largus, Composttiones, p. 97.
39Cassius Felix, De Medicina. pp. 177-178.
40
Pliny the Elder, Historia Naturalis, Book xx,Chapter 22 and Book xxvi,
Chapter 1.
Although one reference to the use of oil43 and another to the use of th
bath 44 were found, most of the references to the cure of leprosy among th
Franks have to do with the supernatural powers of the clergy. An example is
pertinent: On a certain day, while Gaugericus, Bishop of Cambrai, was en
gaged in prayers, a certain leper came to him. Up to this time the leper had
been a sinner. Moved by the bishop, he was pardoned of his sins and was
baptized. Then after having heard mass and after having been blessed by the
bishop, the deacon, and the priest, the leper was as if he had never been af
flicted withleprosy.45 Similar stories appear in the Merovingian chronicles. 46
Something of the attitude of the ancients and the early Franks toward
lepers can be found in the sources. According to Herodotus, Persians af
flicted with the disease could not enter cities or have any dealings with other
Persians.*? From stone landmarks, it appears that lepers of ancient Baby
lonia were banished to the desert.48 Laws of the Jews condemned lepers to
the wilderness and forbade them from entering cities.49 And the Roman
physician, Oribasius, writing in the fourth century, felt that lepers ought to
remain outside the city. 50
Fear of contagion from lepers also prevailed among the early Franks.
According to one writer, Rotharis, King of the Lombards, issued a regulation
in 643 depriving anyone afflicted with leprosy the right of remaining in the
kingdom and of holding property.51 In a capitulary of 757, Pepin, King of the
Franks, provided that "if a leprous man had a sound wife and wished to give
her freedom to marry again, she might do so if she wished. " The converse
of this was also true. 52 And Charlemagne later followed this law with another,
in which he stated that "lepers might not intermingle with other people. "53
Even though lepers were generally regarded with loathing and fear
during the ancient and early medieval times, at a rather early date certain
benevolent men began to show mercy to those afflicted with the disease. In a
panegyric on Saint Basil, Saint Gregory of Nyssa extolled the work of his
brother among lepers as follows:
50
Oribasius, Oeuvres, VI, 197.
51
Agnes Lambert, "Leprosy Past and Present" in Nineteenth Century, XVI
(1884), p. 468.
52
"Capituiaria Pippini Francorum," in Recueil des historiens des Gaules
et de la France, V, 643 and "Pippini Capituiaria" in M.G-.H., Leges, I, sec. 2
p. 39. Basing his reference on the laws ol Rotharis, king of the Lombards,
Thomas Hodgkin, Italy and Her InvadersP vols.(Oxford, 1894), VI, 201
"If a woman became afflicted with leprosy, her betrothed was not bound to
marry her."
53 -
"Karoli Magni Capituiaria* in M.G-.H., Leges, I» sec. 2, p. 64.
Saint John Chrysostom, who lived about the time of Saint Basil, stated
that "it was formerly the custom for lepers to be cast from the state, but now
this is not done. 1,55 Evidently the work of men such as Saint Basil was begin
ning to have some effect, but it would be easy to overstress this point in view
of documentary evidence to the contrary.
The humane treatment of lepers also early took the form of establish
ing leper houses for those afflicted. In the third session of the Council of
Chalcedon, Ischyrion complained that his patriarch, Dioscorus, had mis
applied funds for founding such a house.56 By the second half of the fif
century, leper houses were already functioning among the Franks. Edward
Ehlers discovered that such houses were operating at Saint Oyan in 460, at
Chalons, Saone, in 570, and at Verdun in 634. 57 And L. de Keyser found that
Belgium alone had from seven to eight hundred leper houses before the cru
sades. 58
Despite the work of Basil and other early churchmen, the policy of the
church towards lepers was slow in assuming its form. A church council
meeting at Orleans in November 549 decreed that priests should minister to
lepers, give them clothing and food, and show them mercy because of their
intolerable infirmity. 59 Thirty-four years later a provincial council at Lyons
decided that bishops should furnish food and clothing for the lepers of their
city and that lepers should not leave the city without license.60 At length a
council meeting at Worms tookthe attitude that lepers, "if they had been faith
ful Christians, might partake of the body and blood of the Lord. They might
not, however, be allowed to celebrate the feast along with those who were not
afflicted. " 61
60
Mansi, IX, 943.
61Mansi, XV, 875.