J Applthermaleng 2020 115990
J Applthermaleng 2020 115990
J Applthermaleng 2020 115990
A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T
Keywords: This work primarily focuses on designing a cost effective method yielding high rate of heat transfer from a heated
PCM object to ensure the faster melting of the phase change material (PCM). A numerical investigation has been
Natural convection performed on the laminar natural convection from a two-dimensional heated circular cylinder confined in a
Melting
square enclosure filled with a phase change material, namely, the lauric acid. In particular, the coupled mo
Circular cylinder
Square enclosure
mentum and energy equations are solved to delineate the influence of the geometric position of the cylinder
within the square enclosure on the melt and heat transfer characteristics of the phase change material. The solid-
liquid phase change is formulated using the enthalpy–porosity technique. The detailed velocity and temperature
fields are visualized in terms of velocity vectors, isotherm contours, melt fraction contours, melting rate, energy
storage and surface averaged Nusselt number. The results reported herein are restricted to the six distinct
geometrical positions (i.e., four symmetric and two asymmetric) of the cylinder within the enclosure. The rate of
convective heat transport and hence the melt fraction is found to decrease with the increasing distance of the
cylinder from the base of the enclosure. In addition, the influence of the mushy zone parameter (Amush) on the
melting behaviour has also been explored. The reported numerical results for the melt fraction have been
correlated as a function of the melting time and the geometric positions of the heated cylinder. Finally, one can
conclude that it is possible to realize an enhanced rate of melting and energy storage simply by adjusting the
location of the cylinder under confinement and thus the performance of a thermal energy storage (TES) system
can remarkably be improved.
* Corresponding author.
E-mail addresses: azim_2021cb03@iitp.ac.in (A. Memon), garima.mishra.12@gmail.com (G. Mishra), anoopg@iitp.ac.in (A.K. Gupta).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.115990
Received 16 May 2020; Received in revised form 29 July 2020; Accepted 29 August 2020
Available online 7 September 2020
1359-4311/© 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
A. Memon et al. Applied Thermal Engineering 181 (2020) 115990
1
Nomenclature Vx, Vy x-, y-components of velocity, ms−
x, y Cartesian coordinates, m
Amush mushy zone parameter, kg.m− 3s− 1
Cp specific heat capacity, J.kg− 1K− 1 Greek symbols
d diameter of the cylinder, m β coefficient of volume expansion, K− 1
g acceleration due to gravity, ms− 2 λ melt fraction, dimensionless
H specific enthalpy, J.kg− 1 δ distance between centre of the enclosure and centre of the
k thermal conductivity, W.m− 1K− 1 cylinder, m
L side length of the square enclosure, m μ viscosity of PCM, Pa.s
Lf latent heat of fusion of the PCM, J.kg− 1 ρ density of fluid, kg.m− 3
Nu surface-average Nusselt number, dimensionless Subscripts
p pressure, Pa x x-axis
Pr Prandtl number, dimensionless y y-axis
q′′ heat flux from the surface of the cylinder, W.m− 2 ref reference conditions
Ra Rayleigh number, dimensionless s solid phase
Ste* modified Stefan number, dimensionless l liquid phase
t time, s
TC initial temperature of the PCM in the enclosure, K Abbreviation
TH temperature at the surface of the cylinder, K PCM phase change material
Tm melting temperature of the PCM, K TES thermal energy storage
V velocity vector, ms− 1
cooling of electronic components [12,13], solar heating systems [33] and Ismail and Stuginsky [34] were among the early researchers to
[14,15], thermal storage in buildings [16,17], cooling helmets [18], determine the influence of natural convection on the melting rate and
textiles [19], HVAC units [20], biomedical applications [21], electric also to delineate the comparison among the various solution strategies
vehicles [22], greenhouses [23], etc. Some commonly used and employed. The solution methods for the numerical modelling of the
commercially available PCMs are paraffin wax (Tm ≈ 57 ◦ C–65 ◦ C), melting/solidification process have been divided in two categories,
lauric acid (Tm ≈ 46 ◦ C), liquid gallium (Tm ≈ 29.8 ◦ C), RT-25 (Tm ≈ namely, the fixed grid methods and the adaptive meshing methods. The
26 ◦ C), capric acid (Tm ≈ 32 ◦ C), n-octadecane (Tm ≈ 28 ◦ C), dodecanoic adaptive meshing methods or the moving mesh methods offer an
acid (Tm ≈ 43 ◦ C), and many salt based PCMs such as CaCl2⋅6H2O (Tm ≈ advantage of good precision of the numerical results. However, the
27 ◦ C–29 ◦ C), etc. complex formulation limits their application to simple geometries
However, for the effective utilization of the PCMs for a specific [35,36]. The fixed grid methods employ the enthalpy formulation for
application, the physical and themo-chemical properties, availability the energy equation. These methods can efficiently model the melting
and economic viability of the PCM are some of the key selection pa process by considering either an isothermal melting process or by
rameters. A PCM should have a suitable phase change temperature as simplifying the phase change process by creating a mushy zone (semi-
per the application, high latent heat, large thermal conductivity both in solid, two-phase zone) in between the two-phases. The isothermal
the liquid and solid phases, negligible sub-cooling, low vapour pressure modelling strategy gives accurate solutions but has a prerequisite for the
for small change in volume during phase transition, chemical and interface boundary to solve the energy equation. On the other hand, the
physical stability and non-toxicity, etc. [2,7]. mushy zone approach reduces the computational efforts with similar
Besides, detailed research efforts need to be directed to examine the accuracy levels and can feasibly be used to model complex multi-
melt characteristics for efficiently designing a latent heat thermal energy dimensional problems with ease [36–40]. The flow through the
storage unit. The analysis of heat and mass transfer in phase transition mushy-zone is modelled as flow through a porous medium using a
problems is defined as a separate class of moving boundary problems. modified form of Carman-Kozeny equation. This avoids numerical in
During the process of melting or solidification, the solid-liquid interface stabilities in reaching sharp interface boundaries and considers a smooth
changes as the heat is absorbed or released into the system. The differ transition from a solid to a liquid state or vice versa. However, the grid
ence in the thermo-physical properties of the two phases and the diffi resolution in resolving the gradients in the mushy zone and the selection
culty in tracking the moving interface complicate the study of melting of mushy zone parameter (Amush) is crucial to the efficient modelling of
and solidification process [8]. This class of problems were first examined the melting phenomenon [41,42]. The influence of mushy zone
by Stefan in 1889 for ice formation [24]. Henceforth, several solutions parameter has been numerically examined in detail by Fadl and Eames
(analytical and numerical) were made available for the Stefan’s problem [42] for melting inside the vertically and horizontally oriented thermal
using different techniques. The various analytical and numerical energy system.
methods used to solve this class of problems have been extensively The melting of PCM within the enclosures of various shapes such as
reviewed in the literature [4,8,9]. Very few analytical solutions are ducts, pipes, annulus, spherical shells, etc., has been extensively exam
available in the closed form, and that too only for idealized one- ined over the years. Excellent reviews on the numerical modelling of the
dimensional geometries with simplified boundary conditions [25,26]. PCM melting inside in geometries of various shapes exist in literature
Numerical techniques based on finite element and finite volume [9,43]. Amidst all, examining the melting of PCM in rectangular en
methods have been reported in solving such moving boundary problems closures forms a fundamental configuration of great relevance and in
with improved accuracy [27–30]. Initially, the problem was approached dustrial importance [44–46]. Kamkari et al. [46] experimentally studied
by considering conduction to be the sole mode of heat transfer. Such a the effect of inclination angle on the melt characteristics for the PCM
simplification does not correctly capture the intricacies in a complex (lauric acid) in a rectangular enclosure. They found that the melting rate
process such as phase change. Hence, later research in the field was is high for a horizontally placed enclosure compared to that for a vertical
focused to incorporate and examine the influence of natural convection enclosure. Moreover, recently Elsayed [47] has investigated the effect of
on the melting process. Gobin [31], Hahn and Ozisik [32], Eckert et al. hot air stream on the PCM (paraffin wax) melting inside the triangular
2
A. Memon et al. Applied Thermal Engineering 181 (2020) 115990
Adiabatic wall
L = 4 cm
(δx = –L/4, δy = +L/4)
Top
(δy = +L/4)
Adiabatic wall
y
Adiabatic wall
Centre
TH (δ = 0)
Left x
(δx = –L/4) d
Bottom
(δy = –L/4)
Bottom asymmetric
(δx , δy = –L/4) L = 4 cm
Adiabatic wall
Fig. 1a. Schematics of the computational domain and grid structure.
containers of constant volume but different apex angles (24◦ , 60◦ and pure Gallium as the phase change material using finite-volume method.
100◦ ) using ANSYS-Fluent. They observed the higher heat storage ca They examined the configuration for the two specific boundary condi
pacity in the acute triangular cylinders in comparison to the obtuse and tions of constant wall temperature and constant heat flux on the surface
equilateral cylinders. of the cylinder. They reported that the large part of energy is transmitted
Next, free convection heat transfer from a cylinder in a solid enclo by means of natural convection from the upper part rather than the
sure forms the prototype case for a broad range of melting/solidification lower part of the heated cylinder. Besides, several strategies have been
applications utilizing PCMs such as in heat exchangers, mixing vessels, employed to improve the heat transfer and melting rate in a phase
solar cells, recyclable batteries, power plants, etc. Here, the heat transfer change process by increasing the thermal conductivity of PCMs [58,59],
rate and so the melting is limited by the interaction between the cylinder by using extended surfaces such as finned cylinders/walls [60] or by
surface and the enclosure walls, and the thermal nature of confining micro-encapsulation of the PCM [61]. Another strategy can be due to
walls (isothermal, adiabatic, etc.) in addition to the properties of phase simple modifications to the geometrical configuration which leads to an
change materials. White et al. [48] and Yao and Chen [49] were amongst alternative but cost efficient method to achieve the higher charging/
the first researchers to examine the problem of melting of the PCM melting rate in the PCM. Notwithstanding the existence of literature
around a circular cylinder using perturbation analysis. However, these dealing the melting/solidification of the PCM around a horizontal cyl
studies have limitations of applicability to only initial melting phase inder, to the best of authors’ knowledge, there is no comparative study
where conduction is the dominant mode of heat transfer and buoyancy- available focusing on delineating the influence of various symmetric and
induced currents are weak. Bathelt and Viskanta [50] initiated the asymmetric locations of the cylinder within the square enclosure filled
experimental investigation for melting of paraffins around a heated with a PCM. Thus, the present work aims to fill this gap and examines
circular cylinder. They recorded the melt fraction picture at different the effects of various possible geometrical adjustments in the location of
time instants of melting and reported the heat transfer coefficient at the circular cylinder placed inside a square enclosure on the melting
solid-liquid interface. Cheng et al. [51] conducted experiments to study process of the lauric acid as the PCM. The work has been carried out for
the effect of natural convection on ice formation around a cold circular the six different geometric placements/locations of the cylinder within
cylinder. They reported the values of heat transfer coefficients and the the enclosure, namely, centre, left, top, bottom, top asymmetric and
average Nusselt number behaviour at the ice-water interface. bottom asymmetric. The influence of the mushy zone parameter (Amush)
Later, Rieger et al. [52] used the body fitted coordinates to numer on the melting rate, melting interface and on the absorbed energy has
ically compute this problem and emphasized on the importance of the also been explored. Apart from this, the work has also been extended for
convective currents in the melting process. Prusa and Yao [53,54] seven other shapes of the cylinder to develop an insight into the melting
studied the enhancement in the melting rate for a heated horizontal behaviour around variously shaped 2D heated objects and thus to
cylinder by means of the numerical and perturbation methods for the enhance the applicability of the work in a broader spectrum.
conditions of constant heat flux and constant wall temperature pre
scribed on the cylinder surface. The solutions were valid for short times 2. Problem statement and mathematical formulation
after the initiation of melting process. Sasaguchi et al. [55] also used the
body-fitted coordinates to examine the melting around a single and two Consider an isothermal (at temperature, TH) circular cylinder (long
horizontally and vertically placed circular cylinders in an enclosure. in z-direction) of diameter ‘d’ placed horizontally in a square enclosure
They examined the influence of the initial temperature on the melting of side length L = 4 cm. The confinement ratio (d/L) is taken to be 0.1.
rate and compared the rate of melting for the two cases of a single and The enclosure is filled with a solid PCM, namely, the lauric acid kept at a
double cylinders inside the enclosure. temperature TC where TC < TH. The effect of geometric placement of the
Additionally, Sugawara et al. [56] numerically examined the impact cylinder within the square enclosure has been analysed for both sym
of the vertical position of a circular cylinder on freezing/melting of metric (centre, left, top, bottom) and asymmetric (top asymmetric, bottom
water/ice around the cylinder in a square cavity. They concluded that symmetric) positioning of the cylinder with respect to both the horizontal
melting significantly decreases with increasing cylinder distance from and vertical centreline of the enclosure, as shown in Fig. 1a. In this work,
the base of the enclosure. Mahdaoui et al. [57] numerically studied the δ = 0 refers to the centre position, δx = − L/4 to left position, δy = +L/4
melting process around a horizontal cylinder in an enclosure filled with to top position, δy = − L/4 to the bottom position. Two asymmetric
3
A. Memon et al. Applied Thermal Engineering 181 (2020) 115990
temperature difference, the solid lauric acid acquires the heat from the The latent enthalpy used in Eq. (4) is related to the liquid or melt
hot circular cylinder and melts as the temperature increases beyond the fraction (λ) during the phase change as follows:
average melting temperature, Tm. Consequently, the rise in temperature
results in a decrease in the density of the fluid melt thereby giving rise to ΔH = λ(T)Lf (6)
buoyancy-induced flow currents in the upward direction; thus facili
tating heat transfer by natural convection. During the melting process, where, href is the enthalpy at reference temperature Tref , Lf is the latent
the phase change material transits from solid to liquid phase via a heat and λ(T) is the melt fraction defined as follows:
transition zone known as the “mushy zone”. Mushy zone can be ⎧
0 if T < (Tm − ΔT)
⎪
considered as a semi-solid zone between the purely solid and liquid ⎪
⎪
⎨
T − Tm + ΔT
phases. The transition temperature range (or melting range) considered λ(T) = if (Tm − ΔT)⩽T⩽(Tm + ΔT) (7)
⎪ 2ΔT
in the present work is nearly 4.7 K (=2ΔT) where (Tm–ΔT) is considered ⎪
⎪
⎩
to be the “solidus”, and (Tm + ΔT) to be the “liquidus” temperature. For 1 if T > (Tm + ΔT)
the solid-liquid transition region inside the PCM, the Enthalpy-Porosity The melt fraction λ(T) varies between 0 and 1. It is zero when the
approach [39,62,63] has been employed. This technique does not track PCM is solid phase whereas it is 1 for the liquid phase. The energy source
the solid-liquid interface explicitly. Instead, it treats the mushy region as term, Sh, used in Eq. (3) is given as:
porous with the porosity equal to the melt fraction (or volume fraction)
associated with each cell in the computational domain. The melt fraction Sh =
∂(ρ ΔH)
+ ∇⋅(ρ VΔH) (8)
indicates the fraction of the cell volume that is in liquid form. In order to ∂t
keep the level of the complexity to a tractable level, the following The momentum source term, Sm, in Eq. (2) describes the flow in a
pertinent assumptions have been made: porous medium and can be defined as a function of melt fraction as
follows,
• The melted PCM behaves as a Newtonian fluid.
• The flow is two-dimensional, laminar and incompressible (except for Sm = − A(T) V (9)
the body force term). The function A(T) is defined using a modified form of Carman-
• The properties of PCM are different for solid and liquid phases. Kozeny equation [39,63] as follows:
• Both the solid and liquid phases are homogeneous, isotropic and are
in thermal equilibrium with the interface. Amush (1 − λ(T))2
A(T) = (10)
• Thermal radiation and viscous dissipation effects are negligible. λ3 (T) + ε
• The density stratification within the fluid elements are well governed
In the above expression, the function A(T) accounts for the velocity
by the Boussinesq approximation given as, ρl − ρ = ρl β(T − Tm ),
switch-off in solid PCM. When the entire PCM melts (for T > Tm + ΔT),
where β is the coefficient of thermal expansion of PCM.
the melt fraction λ(T)⟶ 1 and the source term (Sm) in the momentum
equation becomes zero approaching the general momentum conserva
The thermo-physical properties of the PCM (density, ρpcm; thermal
tion equation applicable for a Newtonian fluid flow. However, when the
conductivity, kpcm; and specific heat capacity, Cp,pcm) except the viscosity
temperature of PCM is lower than the solidus temperature (i.e., T < Tm –
are the functions of temperature due to their dependence on the melt
ΔT), the entire PCM is solid and hence λ(T)⟶ 0. In this case, the flow
fraction.
velocity is nearly zero thereby leading to minimal contributions from the
source term. Thus, the source term shows its prominent contributions
during the melting process in the mushy zone only (i.e., within melting
2.1. Governing equations regime). In this regime, the mushy zone parameter Amush plays a major
role in controlling the heat transfer and the melting characteristics of
Within the framework of above-mentioned assumptions, the coupled phase change material. The values of this parameter depends on the
velocity and temperature fields are governed by the time-dependent morphology of the PCM and significantly influence the location of the
continuity, momentum and energy equations, which are written as solid-liquid melt interface and its progression during the melting pro
follows: cess. Sufficiently large values of Amush suppress the flow in the regions
Continuity equation: where the PCM is solid and thus correctly predict the solid-liquid
∂ρ interface. Low values of Amush lead to unrealistic predictions in delin
+ ∇.(ρV) = 0 (1) eating the moving solid-liquid interface whereas excessively values of
∂t
Amush cause the results to oscillate. Alternatively, very large values of
Momentum equation:
Amush assume more volume of the PCM in the mushy region which is
∂(ρV) mostly static in nature. This under-estimates the actual behaviour of the
+ ∇.(ρV) = − ∇p + μ∇2 V + ρg + Sm (2)
∂t PCM under natural convection, however, very small values of Amush
over-predict the extent of melting. Hence, a careful selection of Amush
Energy equation:
parameter is crucial in envisaging the numerical modelling of the
∂(ρH) melting process. Values between 104 and 107 kg/m3s are the recom
+ ∇.(ρVH) = k∇2 T + Sh (3)
∂t mended values for most calculations [42,62]. These aspects have been
In the aforementioned Eqs. (1)–(3), V is the velocity vector, p is critically reviewed and discussed in ref. [42]. One may also find a
pressure, T is temperature, Sm is the momentum source term and H is the detailed analysis and comparison between the choice of various values
specific enthalpy. The specific enthalpy (H) is defined as the sum of of Amush and experimental data in the study of Kheirabadi and Groulx
sensible enthalpy (h) and latent enthalpy (ΔH) as follows: [64] who recommended Amush = 106 kg/m3s to ensure the best overall
match between their numerical predictions and the experimental re
H = h + ΔH (4) sults. In the present work, Amush = 105 kg/m3s has been employed.
Moreover, the influence of Amush on the melting rate and the progression
where the sensible enthalpy can be expressed as:
4
A. Memon et al. Applied Thermal Engineering 181 (2020) 115990
Table 1
• Specific heat capacity
Thermo-physical properties of the lauric acid as the PCM [42].
Property Solid Liquid The specific heat capacity for a PCM can be written as:
Liquidus temperature, Tl = Tm + ΔT (K) – 321.35
Solidus temperature, Ts = Tm–ΔT (K) 316.65 – Cp,pcm (T) = Cp,s + (Cp,l − Cp,s )λ(T) (13)
Melting temperature, Tm (K) 319
The thermo-physical properties of the PCM are calculated at the
Density, ρ (kg/m3) 940 885
Specific heat, Cp (J/kg.K) 2180 2390 liquidus temperature (Tl) for the evaluation of the Rayleigh number,
Thermal conductivity, k (W/m.K) 0.16 0.14 Rad = βg(TH − Tm ) d3 /υl αl , Prandtl number, Pr = Cp,l μ/kl , and modified
Viscosity, µ (kg/m.s) – 0.008 Stefan number, Ste* = {Cp,s (Tm − TC ) + Cp,l (TH − Tm )}/Lf , which are
Thermal expansion coefficient, β (1/K) 0.0008
valued as ~2 × 104, ~140 and ~0.55, respectively. In the end, the
–
Latent heat of fusion, Lf (J/kg) 187,210 –
problem definition is completed by specifying initial condition and
physically realistic boundary conditions for this configuration. For the
of solid-liquid interface have also been examined in the present work for velocity field, the usual no-slip boundary condition (V = 0) is prescribed
a broad range of 104 ≤ Amush ≤ 106 kg/m3s. Therefore, the range of on the enclosure walls and the cylinder surface. For temperature, the
values of Amush considered herein are consistent with that reported enclosure walls are thermally insulated, i.e., ∂T/∂ns = 0 whereas the
elsewhere [42,62,64]. A factor ‘ε’ is introduced into the Eq. (10) to ac cylinder surface acts as a heat source and is maintained at a fixed tem
count for the numerical applicability of the equation in the solid phase, i. perature of TH = 343.15 K (70 ◦ C) for all time t. Initially (t = 0), the
e., at λ = 0. A constant value of ε = 0.001 has been used here. temperature of the PCM filled in the enclosure is maintained at 298.15
K.
2.2. Thermo-physical properties Finally, the governing equations subjected to the above boundary
conditions are solved in terms of the primitive variables (V, p, T) and the
The thermo-physical properties of PCM (lauric acid) are listed in results are post-processed to evaluate the local and the derived quanti
Table 1. As mentioned earlier, the thermo-physical properties of the ties to discuss the momentum and heat transfer aspects. The spatial and
PCM (except viscosity) are considered to be temperature-dependent and temporal evolution of the velocity and temperature field is studied using
thus are functions of the melt fraction (λ) of the PCM. This functional velocity vectors, temperature profiles, melt fraction contours, melting
dependence has been approximated in the present work as follows: and energy storage rate, and surface average Nusselt number.
For temperatures beyond the melting regime, i.e., T < (Tm–ΔT) and T
• Density > (Tm + ΔT), the energy is gained by the PCM through sensible heating
only whereas within the melting regime, the latent heat also contributes
The density variation of the PCM can be written as follows: to the energy transfer. The total energy stored within the PCM is
calculated by integrating the enthalpy over the control volume.
ρpcm (T) = ρs + (ρl − ρs )λ(T) (11)
The surface average Nusselt number is calculated by integrating the
temperature gradient over the surface of cylinder as follows:
• Thermal conductivity ∫ ( ⃒ )
hd d ∂T ⃒⃒
Nu = = − dAs (14)
kl As (TH − Tm ) As ∂ns ⃒s
Similar to the above expression for density, the thermal conductivity
can be defined by the following expression:
where, h is the surface averaged heat transfer coefficient defined as
kpcm (T) = ks + (kl − ks )λ(T) (12) follows:
Fig. 1b. Grid sensitivity test for centre (δ = 0) and bottom (δy = − L/4) position of the cylinder: (i) melt fraction; (ii) average temperature of the PCM.
5
A. Memon et al. Applied Thermal Engineering 181 (2020) 115990
Fig. 2a. Comparison of time variation of melt fraction for the PCM filled inside the enclosure: (i) horizontal enclosure; (ii) vertical enclosure. Solid lines: present
results, broken lines: Fadl and Eames [42], symbols: Kamkari et al. [46].
6
A. Memon et al. Applied Thermal Engineering 181 (2020) 115990
Mahdaoui et al. [57] Present results cylinder (at TH = 311 K) immersed inside a rectangular enclosure filled
with the Gallium as the PCM (Tm = 302.93 K). Our results are in close
match with those reported by Mahdaoui et al. [57], see Fig. 2b. Fig. 2a
t = 60 sec t = 60 sec
also suggests the existence of an optimum value of the mushy zone
parameter (Amush ≈ 2 × 105 and 5 × 105) which closely matches with the
experimental results. This value not only depends on the properties of
the PCM and physics of the flow but also on the orientation/configu
ration of the computational setup. Therefore, a prudent selection of the
value of Amush has been the subject of numerous discussions to treat the
fluid flow governed by the natural convection within the mushy region
[64]. The impact of varying the mushy-zone constant (Amush) on the
predicted numerical results has been presented in ensuing sections.
Based on the preceding comparisons, the numerical results presented in
the ensuing sections are believed to be reliable within ±3–4% deviation.
t = 200 sec t = 200 sec
4.2. Temperature contours and velocity vectors
7
A. Memon et al. Applied Thermal Engineering 181 (2020) 115990
Fig. 3. Temporal evolution of isotherm contours for different symmetric positions of the cylinder within the enclosure.
symmetric spread of the fluid region and the thermal plume can be that the rate of hear transfer and thus the fraction of the PCM melted in
observed. the enclosure is anticipated to be the highest for this case (δy = − L/4),
As expected, the buoyancy induced flow currents are seen to be however, the melt characteristics have been discussed in more detail in
stronger in the region above the heated cylinder, whereas the PCM filled the ensuing section. Furthermore, once the temperature of the PCM in
in the enclosure below the cylinder remains in the solid state at a tem the upper half of enclosure becomes higher than the liquidus tempera
perature below the melting range where conduction dominates over ture (T + ΔT), the whole PCM above the cylinder is melted and there
convection. Therefore, the more is the phase change material above the after the energy is transferred from the heated cylinder to the PCM by
cylinder, the greater is the extent and strength of the thermal plume and sensible heating only as illustrated in Fig. 3 for t = 80 min.
thus the higher is the rate of melting. Clearly, the extent of the fluid
circulation in the PCM melt is seen to be maximum for the case δy = − L/
4.3. Melt fraction
4, i.e., when the cylinder is close to the bottom surface of the enclosure.
Intuitively, the trends in the temperature and velocity contours suggest
Fig. 5 and Fig. 6 illustrate the temporal evolutions in the melt
8
A. Memon et al. Applied Thermal Engineering 181 (2020) 115990
Fig. 4. Representative velocity vectors for different symmetric positions of the cylinder inside the enclosure at different time instants (a) t = 5 min; (b) t = 20 min; (c)
40 min.
fraction contours (constant liquid fraction lines) for different geometric interface remains uniform and parallel to the cylinder surface. Also,
placements of the cylinder inside the square enclosure, i.e., for the four there exists a fore and aft symmetry about the x-axis for all values of δ.
symmetric configurations of the cylinder, namely, δ = 0 (centre), δy = As the temperature of the PCM in the close proximity of the cylinder
+L/4 (close to the top wall), δy = − L/4 (close to the bottom wall) and δx increases and comes in the melting range (Tm − ΔT) ≤ T ≤ (Tm + ΔT),
= − L/4 (close to the left wall) as shown in Fig. 5, and the two asym the melting commences and the liquid fraction in a cell takes a value
metric configurations, namely top asymmetric (δx = − L/4, δy = +L/4) between 0 ≤ λ ≤ 1 depending upon the value of the temperature. It is
and bottom asymmetric (δx = − L/4, δy = − L/4) as shown in Fig. 6. These interesting to mention here that at this stage, the liquid PCM is in
results can be visualized similar to that of temperature contours dis transition region and still stagnant due to high viscous forces. Once the
cussed in the aforementioned section. This is simply due to the fact that temperature of liquid PCM increases beyond the liquidus temperature
in the melting process predicted by the enthalpy-porosity technique, the where λ = 1, the natural convection starts and upward moving
temperature is a prime factor in determining the position of the solid- convective currents becomes stronger. This causes a concomitant
liquid interface and hence the melt fraction. Due to this, only a key expansion in the solid-liquid interface in the direction of buoyancy, i.e.,
features have been recapitulated here. the extend of liquid zone increases. For δx = − L/4 (close to left wall), the
At early phase (t ≈ 1 min, Fig. 5), heat transfer from the heated growing liquid PCM capsule intersect with the left wall and the sym
cylinder to the surrounding solid PCM is mainly due to conduction and metry about the y-axis is lost at this instant (t = 20 min). The fluid melt
melt fraction contours are concentric circles and closely follow the shape then slowly drifts towards the top and then to the right thereby
of the cylinder. Until this mode of heat transfer prevails, the solid-liquid encompassing the entire region above the cylinder (t = 80 min). When
9
A. Memon et al. Applied Thermal Engineering 181 (2020) 115990
Fig. 4. (continued).
the whole PCM above the cylinder is fully melted (λ = 1), the energy is δy = − L/4, i.e., for the cylinder placed close to the bottom wall of the
transferred to the PCM beneath the cylinder by conduction were the enclosure. It achieves the completely charged condition (λ = 1) at
feeble convective currents lead to slower progression of the solid-liquid about t = 130 min. As the cylinder moves upwards, the time required to
interface and finally the whole PCM inside the enclosure comes in liquid reach the fully-melt state increases thereby showing the reduced rate
state. For instance, at t ≈ 130 min, the entire PCM confined in the of melting. For example, the slowest melting rate is observed for the
enclosure melts for the bottom configuration of the cylinder (δy = − L/4), case of δy = +L/4 (top) where the PCM takes ~480 min to reach the
as can be seen in Fig. 5. It is worthwhile to notice here that these results fully liquid state. In other words, at any instant, the melt fraction of the
are in line with those reported by Mahdaoui et al. [57] for a circular PCM is higher for the bottom positioning of the cylinder inside the
cylinder positioned inside the rectangular enclosure, at least qualita enclosure, such as at t ≈ 130 min, the melt fraction of the PCM for the
tively. In continuation to this, the trends displayed in Fig. 6 for the two configuration δy = − L/4 (bottom) is equal to 1 (complete liquid state)
asymmetric positions of the cylinder inside the enclosure considered which is ~80% and ~25% higher than the corresponding values of the
herein are the blend of the observations seen for the top, left and bottom melt fraction for δy = +L/4 (top); and δ = 0 (centre) or δx = − L/4 (left),
configurations of the cylinder. At the early stages (t ~ < 5 min), both respectively. Therefore, the vertical distance of the cylinder from the
asymmetric cases predict the same melting and thermal behaviour as base of the enclosure plays a key role in deciding the progression of the
also observed in case of all the four symmetric positions of the cylinder solid-liquid interface and determining the time needed for the entire
such as centre, left, top and bottom (see Fig. 5). The major changes PCM to melt. Interestingly, the results shown by top asymmetric
embark once the time progresses beyond 5 min. For instance, in the top configuration is the same as shown by the top configuration. Similarly,
asymmetric case, the thermal plume and thus the melting interface first the bottom asymmetric and bottom configurations of the cylinder also
touches the top wall of the enclosure and then spreads along the wall and resulted the same results, thereby one may conclude that different
moves downward. Underneath the cylinder, the PCM melts primarily by horizontal positions on the cylinder produce nearly indistinguishable
conduction and thus melting is very sluggish. On the other hand, in case results and thus one may place the cylinder at any horizontal location
of bottom asymmetric position, the rising thermal plume (and thus the (left, centre or right). It is the vertical position of the cylinder which
melting interface) first touches the left wall and continues to rise up until mainly governs the overall melting and heat transfer. These observa
it touches the top wall and then spreads in the right part of the domain. tions can be justified simply due to the presence of same amount of the
Since the PCM has more volume above the cylinder here, melting is PCM above the cylinder. It is also worthwhile to mention that this
accelerated due to natural convection until the liquid PCM occupies the study only deals with the melting of the PCM around an isolated cyl
entire space above the cylinder. After this, conduction becomes domi inder placed inside the enclosure. When more than one cylinders are
nant and therefore, a slower rate of melting is observed. encountered, the inter-spacing between the two cylinders also plays a
Fig. 7a shows the variation in the values of melt fraction (averaged vital role in describing the physics of the flow due to the varying levels
over the entire domain under consideration) of the PCM with time. of interaction among the melting interfaces [66].
Such plots are necessary to depict the rate of melting in the phase From an application standpoint, the present numerical results for
transition process. The fastest melting rate is observed for the case of melt fraction (λ) are correlated as a function of the charging (melting)
10
A. Memon et al. Applied Thermal Engineering 181 (2020) 115990
Fig. 5. Temporal evolution of melt fraction contours for different symmetric positions of the cylinder within the enclosure.
11
A. Memon et al. Applied Thermal Engineering 181 (2020) 115990
Fig. 6. Asymmetric positions of the cylinder within the enclosure: (a) melt fraction contour; (b) temperature contour.
configuration. As the cylinder moves upwards in the enclosure, the rate 4.5. Average Nusselt number
of energy storage within the PCM decays. Therefore, the time taken by
the PCM to reach the same energy levels is ~4 times and ~2 times higher Notwithstanding with the fact that the cylinder is isothermally
for the cylinder at position δy = +L/4 (top) and δx = − L/4 (left) as heated, the temperature gradient and thus the rate of heat transfer varies
compared to that taken at the position δy = − L/4. Similarly, at any fixed locally along the surface of the cylinder. The surface-averaged Nusselt
time instant, the bottom configuration stores more energy in comparison number is expected to be dependent on both the melting time and
to all other locations of the cylinder. For instance, at time t ≈ 130 min, geometrical positioning of the cylinder within the enclosure. Fig. 8
the amount of energy stored in the liquid PCM for the cylinder position shows the time variation of the surface average Nusselt number for the
at δy = − L/4 is ~65% and ~20% greater than that stored for the posi six different positions of the cylinder within the enclosure considered
tions δy = +L/4; and δ = 0 or δx = ±L/4, respectively. The plots for δx = herein. During melting, the convective heat transfer rate is limited by
− L/4 (left) and δ = 0 (centre) are very close to each other due to the the rate of melting of the PCM. As postulated, during early phase of the
same distance of the cylinder from the bottom surface of the enclosure melting process, i.e., for time t < 5 min., the conduction dominates over
for these cases. Moreover, the trends on energy storage rate for asym convection. As the melting progresses, the buoyancy-induced flow
metric configurations (top asymmetric and bottom symmetric) resemble strengthens and the convection contributes increasingly to the overall
to that already discussed in previous section on the rate of melting in heat transfer rate. The Nusselt number values increase as the convective
Fig. 7a. currents becomes stronger in the region above the heated cylinder and
attain their maxima at a time corresponding to the maximum rate of
melting above the cylinder. For instance, the maxima occur at time t ≈
12
A. Memon et al. Applied Thermal Engineering 181 (2020) 115990
Table 2
Values of constants used in Eq. (16a) along with the corresponding errors.
Configuration tcrit (min) a b c % Error
Average Maximum
Fig. 7b. Temporal variation of the total energy stored in the enclosure at
different positions of cylinder inside the enclosure. Fig. 8. Time history of the average Nusselt number for different geometric
placements of the cylinder within the square enclosure.
18 min for the top (δy = +L/4) and left (δx = − L/4) positions; at t ≈ 38
min and t ≈ 45 min for the centre (δ = 0) and bottom (δy = − L/4) po based on the sufficiently large value of the mushy zone constant Amush =
sitions of the cylinder, respectively. Due to the upward buoyant cur 105 kg/(m3s), therefore, it is wise to study the influence of Amush on the
rents, the melting in the PCM above the cylinder is mainly governed by development of solid-liquid interface and the rate of melting. A few
natural convection (fast heat transfer) in contrast to the PCM below the simulations have also been run to briefly depict this dependence. Figs. 9,
cylinder where conduction (slow heat transfer) solely causes the melting 10a and 10b show the representative results for the central location of
to occur. Therefore, once most of the PCM above the cylinder is melted, the cylinder (δ = 0) at the three different values of the mushy zone
the Nusselt number values monotonically decrease due to the continu parameter, namely, Amush = 104, 105 and 106 kg/(m3s). Clearly, the
ously decreasing temperature difference in the PCM which deteriorates melting rate and hence the convective heat transfer rate slows down (i.
the strength of buoyant currents (the velocity Vy ~ ΔT1/2) and thus the e., delayed melting) as the value of Amush gradually increases from 104 to
rate of heat transfer. Finally, the Nusselt number values are seen to 106 kg/(m3s). In other words, the smaller values of the Amush over predict
13
A. Memon et al. Applied Thermal Engineering 181 (2020) 115990
Fig. 9. Effect of mushy zone parameter (Amush) on the solid-liquid interface for δ = 0 (centre) at the two different instants (a) t = 20 min; (b) t = 40 min.
Fig. 10a. Influence of mushy zone parameter (Amush) on the time variation of Fig. 10b. Influence of the mushy zone parameters (Amush) on the time variation
melt fraction for δ = 0. of the total energy stored in the PCM for δ = 0.
Fig. 11. Cylinders of various cross-sections (of same perimeter) considered in this study.
14
A. Memon et al. Applied Thermal Engineering 181 (2020) 115990
Fig. 12. Temporal evolution of melt fraction contours for different shapes of the cylinder within the square enclosure for δ = 0 (cylinder located at the centre).
the extent of melting in the PCM under otherwise identical conditions, as The aforementioned trends are consistent with the findings of Fadl
evident in Fig. 9. However, the effects of the different values of the and Eames [42] and can be reasonably justified with the fact that the
mushy zone parameter are more prominent for the time range where momentum source term, Sm, in Eq. (2) acts as a damping term in the
convection heat transfer subsides the conduction. Significant effects of mushy region. The increasing values of Amush add more volume into the
Amush are visible in the range of t ≈ 5 to 130 min. For time instants t < 5 mushy region where the melted PCM is mostly static (small fluid ve
min (Fig. 10a), the conduction is the dominant mode of heat transfer and locities). This adversely affects the natural convection and thus reduces
hence no effects of the Amush are visible. Also, for t > ~130 min. the the overall heat transfer and melting extent in the domain. Therefore, a
effects of Amush subside due to the exhausted melting rate in the PCM proper selection of Amush is crucial for the accurate prediction of melting
above the cylinder. In the PCM below the cylinder, conduction governs and heat transfer in the latent heat thermal energy storage (LHTES)
the rate of heat transfer and accordingly the Amush shows virtually no systems utilizing PCMs. Essential is to state here that the numerical
influence on the solid-liquid interface in this region. The results for the predictions of results by a sufficiently large value of Amush should be
total energy storage within the liquid PCM (plotted in Fig. 10b) are compared with the available experimental data to ascertain the viability
analogous to those observed in Fig. 10a. of the solution.
15
A. Memon et al. Applied Thermal Engineering 181 (2020) 115990
energy within the PCM are observed at any time instants. Numerical
predictions show that among all the cases, the equilateral triangular
cylinder witnesses the maximum melting and the energy storage rate in
the PCM whereas the horizontally oriented rectangular cylinder results
the minimum values. This is due to the abrupt changes in the body
contour present on the surface of the triangular cylinder which causes
thermal boundary layers to bend thereby increasing the rate of hear
transfer.
It is readily acknowledged that at sufficiently large Rayleigh
numbers, the effects of cylinder body contours are expected to be sig
nificant due to the relatively strong buoyant currents and distortion of
the thermal plumes. Therefore, this part is a matter of detailed discus
sion and a comprehensive analysis over these effects will be presented in
the future work. In addition to this, unlike the heat transfer fluids where
the wall effects (size ratio of the cylinder to the enclosure) also play a
vital role in free-convection heat transfer problems, in case of PCM not
only the strength of buoyancy (Grashof number) may change with the
blockage ratio but also the amount (or mass) of PCM. The smaller is the
Fig. 13a. Time variation of melt fraction for variously shaped cylinders within area available in the annulus, the lesser is the amount of the PCM filled
the square enclosure for δ = 0 (centre). inside it and thus the faster is the melting. At a constant value of the
Grashof number (based on cylinder diameter) and for a range of
confinement (blockage) levels, the melting behaviour is straightforward.
However, the melting behaviour of the PCM under various levels of
confinement generates a different class of problems where both the
Grashof number and blockage ratio may change simultaneously. A
thorough and rigorous analysis in this regard is thus required. This
important section will be presented in detail in our future studies.
5. Conclusions
16
A. Memon et al. Applied Thermal Engineering 181 (2020) 115990
Declaration of Competing Interest [28] G. Comini, S.D. Guidice, R.W. Lewis, O.C. Zienkiewicz, Finite element solution of
non-linear heat conduction problems with special reference to phase change, Int. J.
Numer. Methods Eng. 8 (1974) 613–624.
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial [29] W. Rolph III, K.J. Bathe, An efficient algorithm for analysis of nonlinear heat
interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence transfer with phase change, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 18 (1982) 119–134.
the work reported in this paper. [30] J.S. Hsiao, B.T.F. Chung, An efficient algorithm for finite solution to two
dimensional heat transfer with melting and freezing, ASME paper 84-HT-2,
presented at the 22nd national heat transfer conference, Niagara Falls, August,
Acknowledgements 1984.
[31] D. Gobin, Role de la convection thermique dans les processus de fusion-
solidification, Ecole d_ete, GUT-CET, Mod_elisation num_erique en thermique,
The corresponding author gratefully acknowledges the Department Institut d_etudes scientifiques de Carg_ese (1992).
of Science & Technology (DST), Govt. of INDIA for the INSPIRE Faculty [32] D.W. Hahn, M.N. Ozisik, Phase Change Problems, Chapter 12. Heat Conduction,
3rd ed., John Wiley & Sons Inc., New Jersey, 2012.
Research Grant for the period 2018-2023 to carry out this work.
[33] E.R.G. Eckert, R.J. Goldstein, W.E. Ibele, S.V. Patankar, T.W. Simon, P.
J. Strykowski, K.K. Tamma, T.H. Kuehn, A. Bar-Cohen, J.V.R. Heberlein, D.
References L. Hofeldt, J.H. Davidson, J. Bischof, F. Kulacki, Heat transfer––a review of 1994
literature, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 40 (1997) (1994) 3729–3804.
[34] K.A.R. Ismail, R. Stuginsky Jr., A parametric study on possible fixed bed models for
[1] https://www.c2es.org/content/renewable-energy/.
PCM and sensible heat storage, Appl. Therm. Eng. 19 (1999) 757–788.
[2] H. Nazir, M. Batool, F.J.B. Osorio, M. Isaza-Ruiz, X. Xu, K. Vignarooban, P. Phelan,
[35] J. Yoo, B. Rubinsky, Numerical computation using finite elements for the moving
A.M.K. Inamuddin, Recent developments in phase change materials for energy
interface in heat transfer problems with phase change transformation, Numer. Heat
storage applications: a review, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 129 (2019) 491–523.
Transfer 6 (1983) 209–222.
[3] A. Hussain, S.M. Arif, M. Aslam, Emerging renewable and sustainable energy
[36] R.M. Furzerland, A comparative study of numerical methods for moving boundary
technologies: state of the art, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 71 (2017) 12–28.
problems, J. Inst. Math. Appl. 26 (1980) 411–429.
[4] A. Sharma, V.V. Tyagi, C.R. Chen, D. Buddhi, Review on thermal energy storage
[37] N. Shamsunder, E. Sparrow, Analysis of multidimensional phase change via the
with phase change materials and applications, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 13
enthalpy model, J. Heat Transfer Trans. ASME 19 (1975) 333–340.
(2009) 318–345.
[38] S.E. Hibbert, N.C. Markatos, V.R. Voller, Computer simulation of moving interface,
[5] Y.B. Tao, Y.-L. He, A review of phase change material and performance
convective, phase change process, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 31 (1988) 1785–1795.
enhancement method for latent heat storage system, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
[39] A.D. Brent, V.R. Voller, K.J. Reid, Enthalpy-porosity technique for modeling
93 (2018) 245–259.
convection- diffusion phase change: application to the melting of a pure metal,
[6] J.P. da Cunha, P. Eames, Thermal energy storage for low and medium temperature
Numer. Heat Transfer 13 (1988) 297–318.
applications using phase change materials– a review, Appl. Energy 177 (2016)
[40] L.W. Hunter, J.R. Kuttler, The enthalpy method for heat conduction problems with
227–238.
moving boundaries, J. Heat Transfer Trans. ASME 111 (1989) 239–242.
[7] M.M. Farid, A.M. Khudhair, S.A.K. Razack, S. Al-Hallaj, A review on phase change
[41] S. Arena, E. Casti, J. Gasia, L.F. Cabeza, G. Cau, Numerical simulation of a finned
energy storage: materials and applications, Energy Convers. Manage. 45 (2004)
tube LHTES system: influence of the mushy zone constant on the phase change
1597–1615.
behaviour, Energy Proc. 126 (2017) 517–524.
[8] B. Zalba, J.M. Marı ́n, L.F. Cabeza, H. Mehling, Review on thermal energy storage
[42] M. Fadl, P.C. Eames, Numerical investigation of the influence of mushy zone
with phase change: materials, heat transfer analysis and applications, Appl. Therm.
parameter Amush on heat transfer characteristics in vertically and horizontally
Eng. 23 (2003) 251–283.
oriented thermal energy storage system, Appl. Therm. Eng. 151 (2019) 90–99.
[9] Y. Dutil, D.R. Rousse, N.B. Salah, S. Lassue, L. Zalewski, A review on phase-change
[43] A.A. Al-abidi, S.B. Mat, K. Sopian, M.Y. Sulaiman, A.Th. Mohammed, CFD
materials: mathematical modeling and simulations, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
applications for latent heat thermal energy storage: a review, Renew. Sustain.
15 (2011) 112–130.
Energy Rev. 20 (2013) 353–363.
[10] H. Akeiber, P. Nejat, M.Z.A. Majid, M.A. Wahid, F. Jomehzadeh, I.Z. Famileh, J.
[44] K. Kant, A. Shukla, A. Sharma, Biwole, Melting and solidification behaviour of
K. Calautit, B.R. Hughes, S.A. Zaki, A review on phase change material (PCM) for
phase change materials with cyclic heating and cooling, J. Energy Storage 15
sustainable passive cooling in building envelopes, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 60
(2018) 274–282.
(2016) 1470–1497.
[45] L. Zeng, J. Lu, Y. Li, W. Li, S. Liu, J. Zhu, Numerical study of the influences of
[11] E. Alehosseini, S.M. Jafari, Micro/nano-encapsulated phase change materials
geometry orientation on phase change material’s melting process, Adv. Mech. Eng.
(PCMs) as emerging materials for the food industry, Trends Food Sci. Technol. 91
9 (2017) 1–11.
(2019) 116–128.
[46] B. Kamkari, H. Shokouhmand, F. Bruno, Experimental investigation of the effect of
[12] F.L. Tan, C.P. Tso, Cooling of mobile electronic devices using phase change
inclination angle on convection-driven melting of phase change material in a
materials, Appl. Therm. Eng. 24 (2004) 159–169.
rectangular enclosure, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 72 (2014) 186–200.
[13] X.Q. Wang, A.S. Mujumdar, C. Yap, Effect of orientation for phase change material
[47] A.O. Elsayed, Numerical investigation on PCM melting in triangular cylinders,
(PCM)-based heat sinks for transient thermal management of electric components,
Alexandria Eng. J. 57 (2018) 2819–2828.
Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transfer 34 (2007) 801–808.
[48] R.D. White, A.G. Bathelt, W. Leidenfrost, R. Viskanta, Study of heat transfer and
[14] A. Sari, Thermal reliability test of some fatty acids as PCMs used for solar thermal
melting from a cylinder imbedded in a phase change material, ASME Paper No. 77-
latent heat storage applications, Energy Convers. Manage. 44 (2003) 2277–2287.
HT-42, 1977.
[15] M. Kenisarin, K. Mahkamov, Solar energy storage using phase change materials,
[49] L.S. Yao, F.F. Chen, Effects of natural convection in the melted region around a
Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 11 (2011) 1913–1965.
heated horizontal cylinder, J. Heat Transfer 102 (1980) 667–672.
[16] D. Zhou, C.Y. Zhao, Y. Tian, Review on thermal energy storage with phase change
[50] A.G. Bathelt, R. Viskanta, Heat transfer at the solid–liquid interface during melting
materials (PCMs) in building applications, Appl. Energy 92 (2012) 593–605.
from a horizontal cylinder, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 23 (1980) 1493–1503.
[17] A. Sharma, A. Shukla, C.R.R. Chen, S. Dwivedi, Development of phase change
[51] K.C. Cheng, H. Inaba, R.G. Gilpin, Effect of natural convection on ice formation
materials for building applications, Energy Build. 64 (2013) 403–407.
around an isothermally cooled horizontal cylinder, J. Heat Transfer 110 (1988)
[18] S. Ghani, E.M.A.A. Elbialy, F. Bakochristou, S.M.A. Gamaledin, M.M. Rashwan, The
931–937.
effect of forced convection and PCM on helmets’ thermal performance in hot and
[52] H. Rieger, V. Projahan, H. Beer, Analysis of the heat transport mechanisms during
arid environments, Appl. Therm. Eng. 111 (2017) 624–637.
melting around a horizontal circular cylinder, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 25 (1982)
[19] S. Mondal, Phase change materials for smart textiles – an overview, Appl. Therm.
137–147.
Eng. 28 (2008) 1536–1550.
[53] J. Prusa, L.S. Yao, Melting around a horizontal heated cylinder: Part I–
[20] A.A. Al-Abidi, S.B. Mat, K. Sopian, M. Sulaiman, C.H. Lim, A. Th, Review of thermal
perturbation and numerical solutions for constant heat flux boundary condition,
energy storage for air conditioning systems, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 16 (2012)
J. Heat Transfer 106 (1984) 376–384.
5802–5819.
[54] J. Prusa, L.S. Yao Yao, Melting around a horizontal heated cylinder: Part
[21] A. Shukla, A. Sharma, M. Shukla, C.R.R. Chen, Development of thermal energy
II–numerical solution for isothermal boundary condition, J. Heat Transfer 106
storage materials for biomedical applications, J. Med. Eng. Technol. 39 (2015)
(1984) (1984) 469–474.
363–368.
[55] K. Sasaguchi, K. Kusano, R. Viskanta, A numerical analysis of solid-liquid phase
[22] N. Javani, I. Dincer, G.F. Naterer, G.L. Rohrauer, Modeling of passive thermal
change heat transfer around a single and two horizontal, vertically spaced
management for electric vehicle battery packs with PCM between cells, Appl.
cylinders in a rectangular cavity, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 40 (1997) 1343–1354.
Therm. Eng. 73 (2014) 307–316.
[56] M. Sugawara, Y. Komatsu, H. Beer, Melting and freezing around a horizontal
[23] F. Berroug, E.K. Lakhal, M. El Omari, M. Faraji, H. El Qarnia, Thermal performance
cylinder placed in a square cavity, Heat Mass Transfer 45 (2008) 83–92.
of a greenhouse with a phase change material north wall, Energy buildings 43
[57] M. Mahdaoui, T. Kousksou, S. Blancher, A. Ait Msaad, T. El Rhafiki, M. Mouqallid,
(2011) 3027–3035.
A numerical analysis of solid–liquid phase change heat transfer around a horizontal
[24] J. Stefan, Uber einige probleme der theorie der warmeleitung, Sber Akad Wiss
cylinder, Appl. Math. Model. 38 (2014) 1101–1110.
Wien 98 (1889) 473–484.
[58] K. Kant, A. Shukla, A. Sharma, P.H. Biwole, Heat transfer study of phase change
[25] J. Crank, Free and Moving Boundary Problems, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1984.
materials with graphene nanoparticle for thermal energy storage, Sol. Energy 146
[26] J.M. Hill, One-dimensional Stefan problems: An Introduction, Longman Scientific
(2017) 453–463.
& Technical, Harlow, England, 1987.
[27] C. Bonacina, G. Comini, A. Fasano, M. Primicerio, Numerical solution of phase
change problems, Int. J. Heat Mass transfer 16 (1973) 1825–1832.
17
A. Memon et al. Applied Thermal Engineering 181 (2020) 115990
[59] J.M. Khodadadi, S.F. Hosseinizadeh, Nanoparticle-enhanced phase change [64] A.C. Kheirabadi, D. Groulx, The effect of the mushy zone constant on simulated
materials (NEPCM) with great potential for improved thermal energy storage, Int. phase change heat transfer, In: Proceedings of CHT-15, ICHMT International
Commun. Heat Mass Transfer 34 (2007) 534–543. Symposium on Advances in Computational Heat Transfer, May 25-29, 2015, NJ,
[60] P. Wang, H. Yao, Z. Lan, Z. Peng, Y. Huang, Y. Ding, Numerical investigation of USA. doi: 10.1615/ICHMT.2015.IntSympAdvComputHeatTransf.460.
PCM melting process in sleeve tube with internal fins, Energy Convers. Manage. [65] S.V. Patankar, Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow, Hemisphere, Washington
110 (2016) 428–435. DC, 1980.
[61] S. Jegadheeswaran, S.D. Pohekar, Performance enhancement in latent heat thermal [66] T. Kousksou, M. Mahdaoui, M. Hlimi, R. El Alaiji, T. El Rhafiki, Latent energy
storage system: a review, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 13 (2009) 2225–2244. storage: Melting process around heating cylinders, Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 8 (2016)
[62] ANSYS Inc., ANSYS Fluent user’s guide 19.2, 2019. 128–140.
[63] V.R. Voller, C. Prakash, A fixed grid numerical modelling methodology for
convection-diffusion mushy region phase-change problems, Int. J. Heat Mass
Transfer 30 (1987) 1709–1719.
18