WB50 All
WB50 All
WB50 All
HELM
Contacts:
Post:
HELM,
Mathematics
Education
Centre,
Loughborough
University,
Loughborough,
LE11
3TU.
Email:
helm@lboro.ac.uk
Web:
http://helm.lboro.ac.uk
Contents 50
Tutor's Guide
50.1 Introduction to HELM 1
The HELM project (Helping Engineers Learn Mathematics) was supported by a £250,000 HEFCE
FDTL4 grant for the period Oct 2002-Sept 2005. A HEFCE - funded Transferability Study was
undertaken October 2005-September 2006 encouraging the wider uptake of the use of the HELM
materials.
The HELM project’s output consisted of Workbooks, Interactive Learning segments, a Computer
Aided Assessment regime which is used to help ‘drive the student learning’ and a report on possible
modes of usage of this flexible material.
The Workbooks may be integrated into existing engineering degree programmes either by selecting
isolated stand-alone units to complement other materials or by creating a complete scheme of work
for a semester or year or two years by selecting from the large set of Workbooks available. These
may be used to support lectures or for independent learning.
HELM’s emphasis is on flexibility - the work can be undertaken as private study, distance learning or
can be teacher-led, or a combination, according to the learning style and competence of the student
and the approach of the particular lecturer.
HELM (2015): 1
Section 50.1: Introduction to HELM
2. HELM project Workbooks
50 Workbooks are available which comprise:
• 46 Student Workbooks (listed in 50.4) written specifically with the typical engineering student
in mind containing mathematical and statistical topics, worked examples, tasks and related
engineering examples.
• A Workbook containing Engineering Case Studies ranging over many engineering disciplines.
• A Students’ Guide
The main project materials are the Workbooks which are subdivided into manageable Sections. As
far as possible, each Section is designed to be a self-contained piece of work that can be attempted
by the student in a few hours. In general, a whole Workbook typically represents 2 to 3 weeks’ work.
Each Workbook Section begins with statements of pre-requisites and the desired learning outcomes.
The Workbooks include (a) worked examples, (b) tasks for students to undertake with space for
students to attempt the questions, and, often, intermediate results provided to guide them through
problems in stages, and (c) exercises where normally only the answer is given.
It is often possible for the lecturer to select certain Sections from a Workbook and omit other Sections,
possibly reducing the reproduction costs and, more importantly, better tailoring the materials to the
needs of a specific group.
With funding from sigma the workbooks were updated during 2014 and republished Spring 2015,
and are now available to all Higher Education Institutes worldwide.
2 HELM (2015):
Workbook 50: Tutor’s Guide
®
In the past HELM provided an integrated web-delivered CAA regime based on Questionmark Percep-
tion for both self-testing and formal assessment, with around 5000 questions; most having a page of
specific feedback. These are now largely superseded and so no longer available to other institutions.
HELM (2015): 3
Section 50.1: Introduction to HELM
HELM Consortium,
Triallist Institutions
and Individual
Contributors 50.2
HELM learning resources were produced primarily by a consortium of writers and developers at five
universities:
The HELM consortium gratefully acknowledges the valuable support of many colleagues at their
institutions and at the following institutions involved in additional writing, critical reading, trialling
and revising of the learning materials:
4 HELM (2015):
Workbook 50: Tutor’s Guide
®
HELM (2015): 5
Section 50.2: HELM Consortium, Triallist Institutions and Individual Contributors
Contributors from other institutions
The following is a list of all those at other institutions who have helped in the development of
the HELM materials by contributing examples and text, critically reading, providing feedback from
trialling, pointing out errors, and offering general advice and guidance.
6 HELM (2015):
Workbook 50: Tutor’s Guide
®
HELM Transferability
1. Introduction
During the course of the HELM Project some 30 institutions implemented one or more of the three
aspects of the HELM Resources (Workbooks, Interactive Learning Segments, CAA questions) into
at least one of their programmes.
As CAL and CAA are no longer supported, discussions here focus on the HELM Workbooks alone.
2. Use of Workbooks
In the cases where HELM Workbooks were used to replace existing lecture notes (20% of implemen-
tations), students were issued hard copies of the Workbooks relevant to their modules. Workbooks
were either issued in full at the beginning of each topic or subsections were issued lecture by lecture.
The lecturers choosing to issue relevant sections lecture by lecture felt that this gave them the ad-
vantage of controlling what the students had before them in the class and allowing the lecturer to
give very focussed direction to the students on what they should be doing during a particular time
period. However, issuing complete Workbooks eased any complications in reproduction and simplified
the situation when students had been absent, as they simply knew which Workbook to collect rather
than having to identify particular subsections. In all cases, the materials were made available prior to
the lecturer beginning the topic, allowing students to preview the material in advance of the lectures.
Lecturers, using the Workbooks as their core notes essentially employed one of two approaches to
their lectures.
Some staff, particularly those teaching the material for the first time or for the first time to a particular
group, developed lectures, often Powerpoint based, which reflected the content of the Workbooks
exactly, using the same or very similar examples. Students found this reassuring; they felt safe that
they did not have to take notes, therefore being able to focus on understanding, and they knew
exactly where they were in the material enabling them to easily follow the lecture, and could make
annotations to their Workbooks in the appropriate places. However, some students did feel that this
made the lecture have less value as they could simply study for themselves at home and that in such
lectures they did not have the opportunity to work through the examples themselves to reinforce their
learning.
HELM (2015): 7
Section 50.3: HELM Transferability Project (HELMet)
Other staff lectured in parallel to the content of the Workbook, using their own examples and
developing some of the theory using their own existing notes. Students were kept appraised of which
sections of the Workbooks were being addressed and were directed to work through specific examples
and exercises to follow up the material covered within the lectures. Students appreciated that this
allowed them to see more examples than just those contained in the Workbooks, but they did tend to
feel that in these circumstances they needed to make more extensive notes. It is helpful to students
that when this second approach is chosen that notation used by the lecturer is kept consistent with
that in the Workbooks even where this is not the lecturer’s preferred method - lecturers are more
able to adapt than students struggling to comprehend new mathematical concepts.
The largest subgroup (50% of implementations) used the Workbooks as supplementary notes, linking
them explicitly to the content of the lectures.
In 60% of these cases, hard copies of the Workbooks were issued to students at lectures or tutorials
thus providing an incentive to attend. In the other 40% of these cases, electronic links to the
Workbooks sited on the institutions’ websites were given.
Students were directed to use the material to help them understand the content of their lectures
and to provide additional examples and exercises to use during tutorials and for private study. It
was found that few students made the effort to work through the HELM material if they viewed it
as an optional (albeit very useful) extra. Some students also expressed a lack of conviction about
working through the Workbooks in class, being content to attend tutorials to collect the Workbooks
and taking them home unopened.
Some success has been achieved using a peer tutoring scheme where the Workbooks are used as the
subject matter. This provided a focus for the sessions and excellent support for students struggling
with their mathematics and strong backup for their mentors.
Nevertheless, interviewed students did, in all cases, appreciate having the materials and felt that
when they were preparing for examinations they would be very useful.
Of those institutions using the Workbooks as supplementary materials, around 20% restricted use of
the materials to a small subset of the module content. They tended to use the most fundamental
Workbooks (1: Basic Algebra, 2: Basic Functions, 3: Equations, Inequalities & Partial Fractions) as
they wanted to establish the foundations with what would be regarded as fairly weak mathematicians.
For more advanced mathematical topics they continued with their existing notes. They found that
using the materials for this group allowed the students to be able to spend time honing their skills
before moving on to more challenging topics.
8 HELM (2015):
Workbook 50: Tutor’s Guide
®
Some 30% of implementations used the Workbooks as supplementary materials and made the Work-
books available to students but did not specifically attach them to particular modules or courses. In
most cases the Workbooks were made available online for students to download and (if required)
print off themselves. Links to the Workbooks were provided by lecturers and/or through support
centres.
In the support centres, hard copies were sometimes obtainable on request or at least there were
reference copies available. It is difficult to measure the rate of uptake in these circumstances.
However, having this range of materials available as part of a support service for students is seen as
valuable by students and staff alike.
It was noticeable that mature students and those with special needs (typically dyslexics) were
very appreciative of the Workbooks and did make extensive use of them, no matter which usage
mode was employed, citing being able to work at their own pace and being confident that they had
a complete set of notes as large positives.
3 Tutorial assistants
Many institutions use postgraduates for tutoring and the HELM Workbooks provide a sure foundation
for them. (It is well documented that staff often fail to keep their tutorial assistants adequately
informed of their lecture notes and chosen methods, and students seeking help often have woefully
inaccurate notes.)
HELM (2015): 9
Section 50.3: HELM Transferability Project (HELMet)
HELM Workbook
1. List of Workbooks
10 HELM (2015):
Workbook 50: Tutor’s Guide
®
• 33 Mathematics Workbooks (1 to 33) written specifically with the typical engineering student in
mind containing mathematical topics, worked examples, tasks, exercises and related engineering
examples.
• 1 Workbook (34) emphasising the mathematical modelling of motion, with worked examples,
tasks, exercises and related engineering examples.
• 12 Statistics Workbooks (35 to 46) written specifically with the typical engineering student in
mind containing statistical topics, worked examples with an emphasis on engineering contexts,
tasks and exercises.
• 1 Workbook (48) containing 20 Engineering Case Studies ranging over many engineering dis-
ciplines.
• 1 Student’s Guide (49) containing helpful advice, various indexes and extensive facts and
formulae sheets for mathematics and mechanics.
• 1 Tutor’s Guide (50) relating success stories and challenges and encapsulating good practice
derived from trialling in a variety of institutions with their individual contexts and cultures.
The Workbooks are subdivided into manageable Sections. As far as possible, each Section is designed
to be a self-contained piece of work that can be attempted by the student in a few hours. In general,
HELM (2015): 11
Section 50.4: HELM Workbook Structure and Notation
a whole Workbook represents about 2 to 3 weeks’ work. Each Section begins with statements of
prerequisites and desired learning outcomes.
The Tasks include space for students to attempt the questions; many Tasks guide the student through
problems in stages.
It is often feasible for the lecturer to select certain Sections from a Workbook and omit others,
reducing the reproduction costs if using hardcopy and better tailoring the materials to the needs of
a specific group.
3. Notation Used
Fonts
In general HELM uses italic serif font letters to represent functions, variables and constants. However,
as exceptions HELM Workbooks use the following non-italic sans-serif letters:
Mathematics
e for the exponential constant and for the exponential function (primarily use in introductory
Workbook 6, elsewhere e is often used)
i where i2 = −1
Statistics
Complex numbers
p
HELM uses i rather than j to represent (−1) so i2 = −1, although there are one or two exceptions
to this (in Workbook 48: Engineering Case Studies).
Vectors
HELM uses n̂ for the unit normal vector but does not put the ˆ on the basic unit vectors in the x, y
and z directions which have the standard symbols i, j, k.
Identities
Although HELM introduces and uses the identity symbol ‘≡’ extensively in Workbook 1: Basic
Algebra and in Workbook 4: Trigonometry it is not normally used elsewhere and the more normal
‘=’ is used except where emphasis seems advisable. (HELM is therefore not consistent.)
12 HELM (2015):
Workbook 50: Tutor’s Guide
®
Problems in engineering almost invariably involve physical quantities, for example distance, mass,
time, current, measured in a variety of units: metres, miles, amps, litres, etc. When using mathe-
matics to solve applied problems we often are a little slipshod in our approach to the way unknown
variables and associated units are introduced and used.
We may ask for the solution of the equation sin x = 0.5 where x, measured in radians, is in the
interval 0 ≤ x < 2π . But should we say
(a) “Solve the equation sin x = 0.5 where x, measured in degrees, is in the interval 0 ≤ x < 360”,
or
(b) “Solve the equation sin x◦ = 0.5 where x is in the interval 0 ≤ x < 360”, or
(c) “Solve the equation sin x = 0.5 where x is in the interval 0◦ ≤ x < 360◦ ”?
A train is travelling at 80 km h1 and is 2 km from the next station when it starts to brake so that it
comes to a halt at the station. What is the deceleration, assuming it to be uniform during the time
that the brakes were applied?
u2 − v 2 80 × 80 − 0 × 0 80 × 80
Hence = = = = 1600.
2s 2×2 2×2
The (uniform) deceleration is therefore 1600 km h−2 .
In this approach, a represents the magnitude of the deceleration and is a pure number.
HELM (2015): 13
Section 50.5: Issues and Notes for Tutors
A less ‘professional’ solution now follows.
We use the formula v 2 = u2 − 2as where u is the initial speed, v is the final speed and s is the
distance travelled.
u2 − v 2 80 × 80
Hence a = = = 1600 km h2 .
2s 2×2
In this second approach, a represents the deceleration itself and so has units. It seems simpler and
80 × 80
maybe more natural. However, we then get the inconsistency that the fraction , a number,
2×2
is equated to a deceleration a, which is nonsense.
In the HELM Workbooks we have not always given rigorous solutions or taken the greatest care over
the use of units, taking instead a pragmatic line and trying to keep solutions simple.
In truth, in the HELM Workbooks we have not been consistent in our approach, adopting whatever
seemed appropriate to the situation.
We hope that the lecturer will understand what is required for a rigorous solution and forgive us these
lapses. (Any reports of errors or suggestions for improvement of any HELM resources will always be
welcome.)
2. Confidence
We want engineering students to be confident in their mathematics. However, this needs to be
justified confidence. Some informative research by Armstrong and Croft (1999) included a diagnostic
test of mathematics for engineering undergraduates and a confidence test. The results across 28
different mathematical topics (ranging from arithmetic to integration) were illuminating: There was
not a single topic for which the proportion of students expressing a lack of confidence matched or
exceeded the proportion of students answering wrongly. In other words there was overconfidence
across all topics.
It can be concluded that in general any student seeking help needs it and so will many others who
may not admit to it! A student telling his tutor that he has no problems should not be assumed to
be correct - some gentle probing is always advisable.
Reference: Armstrong P.K. & Croft, A.C., (1999) Identifying the Learning Needs in Mathematics of
Entrants to Undergraduate Engineering Programmes in an English University, European Journal of
Engineering Education, Vol.24, No.1, 59-71.
14 HELM (2015):
Workbook 50: Tutor’s Guide
®
When tested with various formats, most students with learning difficulties such as dyslexia preferred a
sans serif font version and this has been adopted. However, a serif font is used for the mathematical
notation. It seems, from past experience that this is preferable since the sans serif mathematical
notation is unfamiliar and ambiguous giving, for example a straight x instead of curved, easily confused
with a times sign, and the digit one looking like the upper case letter “i” and lower case letter “l”
and also like the modulus sign.
Although there is an occasional use of italicised words, the preference is to use emboldening, which
is clearer.
The main suggestion which was not followed concerns text justification. The recommendation is to
use ‘ragged right’ text. Although fully justified text can cause problems for some students it was
decided that HELM’s use of very short paragraphs made that a less important consideration and full
justification improved the general appearance of the page and emphasised the blocks of text.
4. Student Difficulties
On the next two pages are reproduced two actual engineering students’ attempts at an algebra
problem and a calculus problem. They demonstrate a range of errors.
These examples can be used as a basis of discussion with tutorial assistants, new staff and others
as to how to diagnose and remedy problems experienced by students challenged by mathematical
problems.
HELM (2015): 15
Section 50.5: Issues and Notes for Tutors
1 3 3
1. 144 2 + 144 2 = 144 4
2. (a)
(x + 6)(x + 5) = (6 + x)(5 + x)
= 6(5 + x) + x(5 + x)
= 30 + 6x + 5x + x2
= x2 + 11x + 30
(b)
(x + 1)(x + 2)(x + 3) = (x2 + 2x + x + 2)x + 3
= (x2 + 3x + 2)x + 3
= x3 + 3x2 + 2x + 3x2 + 9x + 6
= x3 + 6x2 + 11x + 6
3. (a)
11x + 7 = 0
11x + 7 − 7 = −7
11x −7
=
11 11
−7
x =
x
(b)
x2 + 6x − 7 = 0
x2 + 6x − 7 + 7 = 7
6x 7
x2 + =
6 6
7
x2 + x =
6
7
x3 =
6
7
x =
18
(c)
x2 + x − 8 = 0
x2 + x − 8 + 8 = 8
x3 = 8
8
x =
3
16 HELM (2015):
Workbook 50: Tutor’s Guide
®
Problem
Given: 31
x+7 3
y= , x>
4x − 3 4
Student’s Solution
1
ln(x + 7) 3
ln y = 1
ln(4x − 3) 3
1
3
ln(x + 7)
ln y = 1
3
ln(4x − 3)
ln(4x − 3) ln(x + 7)
1 dy −
= x + 7 4x − 3
y dx (ln(4x − 3))2
ln(4x − 3) ln(x + 7)
dy
1
x+7 3 −
= × x+7 4x − 3
dx 4x − 3 (ln(4x − 3)2
ln 1 ln 8
dy
13
8 −
When x = 1 = × 8 1
dx 1 (ln 1)2
0−0
= 2×
0
dy
Therefore = 0 when x = 1
dx
HELM (2015): 17
Section 50.5: Issues and Notes for Tutors
Description of HELM
On the following three pages are reproduced from the Student’s Guide explanatory pages concerning
Workbook Layout.
18 HELM (2015):
Workbook 50: Tutor’s Guide
®
HELM (2015): 19
Section 50.6: Description of HELM Workbook layout
20 HELM (2015):
Workbook 50: Tutor’s Guide
®
HELM (2015): 21
Section 50.6: Description of HELM Workbook layout
List of Sections in
Workbooks 1 to 48 50.7
22 HELM (2015):
Workbook 50: Tutor’s Guide
®
HELM (2015): 23
Section 50.7: List of Sections in Workbooks 1 to 48
Workbook 12 - Applications of Differentiation (63 pages)
12.1 Tangents and Normals
12.2 Maxima and Minima
12.3 The Newton-Raphson Method
12.4 Curvature
12.5 Differentiation of Vectors
12.6 Case Study: Complex Impedance
24 HELM (2015):
Workbook 50: Tutor’s Guide
®
HELM (2015): 25
Section 50.7: List of Sections in Workbooks 1 to 48
Workbook 25 - Partial Differential Equations (42 pages)
25.1 Partial Differential Equations
25.2 Applications of PDEs
25.3 Solution using Separation of Variables
25.4 Solutions using Fourier Series
26 HELM (2015):
Workbook 50: Tutor’s Guide
®
HELM (2015): 27
Section 50.7: List of Sections in Workbooks 1 to 48
Workbook 40 - Sampling Distributions and Estimation (22 pages)
40.1 Sampling Distributions
40.2 Interval Estimation for the Variance
28 HELM (2015):
Workbook 50: Tutor’s Guide
®
Commentaries on
Workbooks 1 to 48 50.8
This Workbook is therefore placed first in the series to emphasise the importance of the mathemat-
ics it covers. The five areas that it deals with are: mathematical notation and symbols, indices,
simplification and factorisation (of expressions), algebraic fractions, and formulae and transposition.
Section 1.1 may seem elementary to the majority of students, but experience has shown that many
of them have lacunae in their knowledge and understanding, even at this level. Particular attention
needs to be paid to the understanding of, and correct use of, the modulus sign and the sigma notation.
In the interpretation of index notation, care is needed with negative powers on the denominator of
a fraction and the (obvious) fact that different powers of the same variable (e.g. a2 + a3 ) cannot
be combined together. Correct use of a pocket calculator when fractional powers are involved also
needs attention. In general it must be explained that using a pocket calculator successfully needs a
good grasp of the underlying algebra.
The importance of Section 1.3 cannot be overstated. It is disappointing to find that so many
undergraduates have difficulty in correct manipulation of algebraic expressions. To see in a student’s
attempted solution of a problem in reliability the ‘mathematics’ 1 − (1 − e−t ) ≡ e−t demonstrates
a lack of knowledge of the distributive law. Such errors are all too common and prevent the correct
solution of straightforward problems in engineering. There are no short cuts: the basics must be
thoroughly understood and students must be made aware of this. Factorisation should become
second nature and this, too, demands time and effort.
Handling algebraic fractions is made more difficult these days when school students are not given
a thorough grounding in the arithmetic of number fractions. It would be wise to give students
some revision in dealing with number fractions as a precursor, so that the ‘rules’ for manipulating
algebraic fractions make sense. Students who attempt to apply the rules without understanding
them sometimes come a cropper, and subsequent stages of the attempted solution of an engineering
problem are then incorrect.
The transposition of formulae is a skill whose lack is frequently commented on. To many academics
this skill is too often taken for granted, but many students have at best a shaky grasp of what they
HELM (2015): 29
Section 50.8: Commentaries on Workbooks 1 to 48
are attempting to do and of the ‘rules’ that they are using. Once again, it is practice, which is
required, and examples from their engineering studies should be used as much as possible so that
they see the relevance of what they are doing.
The last point applies quite generally. Although the use of ‘abstract’ examples has merit, every set
of examples should, where possible, include at least one framed in the context of the engineering
1 1 1
discipline relevant to each student. To make R the subject of the formula = + is surely
R R1 R2
more interesting to an electrical engineering undergraduate than being asked to make z the subject
1 1 1
of the formula = + .
z x y
This Workbook covers the areas: the concept of a function, the graph of a function, functions in
parametric form, classifying functions, linear functions, simple standard engineering functions, and
the circle.
For students not versed in the idea of a function the box diagram (input - rule - output) has proved
to be the most useful in discussing the topic, particularly with regard to the inverse of compound
functions. By treating a few very simple functions in this way, it is then time to introduce the concept
of a function as a mapping and the notation f (x). Then compound functions can be studied and
the box diagram approach helps to clarify the domain and range.
When presenting the representation of a function as a graph it is important to stress the word
‘representation’; too many students think that the graph is the function. Now is the time to present
a function as a box diagram, a rule and as represented by a graph in order to show the link between
the three approaches.
At this early stage it is possible to give examples of functions described in parametric form and
demonstrate how to calculate points on their graph. It is then the time to present an example
of a function which would be very difficult, or impossible, to present in the standard f (x) form.
Incidentally, it is a good idea to now consider functions whose input variable is not x, say t .
The inverse of a function, its domain and range can be discussed first by box diagram, then by
rule and then by graph, in that order. The use of the terms ‘one-to-one’ etc can now be safely
mentioned provided that the treatment is gentle. The distinction between functions whose inverse
is itself a function and those for which this is not true can be illustrated by examples such as
f (x) = x + 2, f (x) = 2x, f (x) = x3 and f (x) = x2 . Other examples can be presented via graphs.
With simple examples, and a liberal use of the graphical approach, the concepts of continuity, piece-
wise definition, periodicity, oddness and evenness can extend the portfolio of functions considered.
Illustrating these concepts, however crudely, by examples from engineering is particularly important
here, to prevent the presentation drifting into an apparently aimless academic exercise.
30 HELM (2015):
Workbook 50: Tutor’s Guide
®
When students met the topic of straight lines at school it was almost certainly not as the graphical
representation of a linear function. The advantage, for example, of calculating the exact distance
between two points as opposed to a graphical estimation should be stressed, by asking students
to discuss how they would find the distance between two points in three dimensions and why the
problem is different from the two-dimensional case.
A circle in standard form is an example of an implicit function, but that may be too deep to discuss
at this level. Rather it provides the opportunity to carry out some simple coordinate geometry where
the visual checks are easy to perform. The use of some of these results in the relevant engineering
discipline must be demonstrated.
Polynomial functions are well behaved and can act as a vehicle for looking at concepts of oddness
and evenness, decreasing, increasing and stationary. Simple rational functions, including f (x) = x−1
allow ideas of discontinuity and asymptotes to be introduced. The modulus function and the unit
step function allow students to widen their horizons on the meaning of ‘function’ and can be (and
must be) shown to have practical engineering applications.
The areas that this Workbook deals with are: the solution of linear equations, the ‘solution’ of
quadratic equations and polynomial equations in general, simultaneous equations, simple inequalities
and their solution, determination of partial fractions.
There are examples a-plenty of linear equations in engineering and the opportunity should be taken
to introduce the topic via one from the students’ discipline. Linking the solution to the graph of
a straight line crossing an axis is recommended. Are there any cases therefore where no solution
exists? Is the solution unique and why is it important to know this?
The solution of quadratic equations provides an opportunity to bring together several areas of math-
ematics. Looking at graphs of various quadratics suggests the possibility of two distinct solutions, a
unique solution or no solutions; algebra can verify the suggestion. The usefulness of factorisation in
determining the crossing points of the graph on the horizontal axis, and the location of the stationary
point of the function can be stressed, but if no factors exist students may find the method wasteful of
time; honesty is essential. Completing the square is clumsier in determining two crossing points but
readily yields information about the stationary point when there are no solutions of the associated
quadratic equation. The formula method then comes into its own as providing relevant information
in all cases; this is the time to introduce it, but do stress the relevant strengths of all the approaches.
The introduction to higher degree polynomial equations should be gentle and, in the main, concen-
trating on general principles. It is a good moment in the course to emphasise how the complexity of
the problem increases as the degree of the polynomial increases.
HELM (2015): 31
Section 50.8: Commentaries on Workbooks 1 to 48
The solution of simultaneous equations allows the opportunity to show the interaction between graph-
ical indication and algebraic determination. Start with the four graphical cases of single intersection
(at almost right-angles), parallel lines, coincident lines, and almost-coincident lines. Then show how
the graphs relate to the algebraic ‘solution’. A simple introduction to ill-conditioned equations can
be given here.
The relationship between a simple inequality and points on the real line helps students to visualise
the meaning of the inequality; its solution algebraically can be related to the picture. The case of a
quadratic inequality is only sensibly dealt with at this level by extensive use of a graphical argument.
The first point to emphasise with expressing a rational function as a sum of partial fractions is
the need to choose suitably-shaped partial fractions; the process of finding the coefficients in the
numerators can then, in principle, follow successfully. It is recommended that a single strategy is
employed: combine the proposed partial fractions into a single fraction with the same denominator as
the original fraction; substitute suitable values of the variable into the numerators to obtain, one by
one, the unknown coefficients; if this does not determine all of them resort to comparing coefficients
of powers of the variable. It is suggested that at least one example is given where one of the unknown
coefficients is zero to warn the students that this can happen with a general strategy and ask whether
they could have foreseen that zero value.
Workbook 4: Trigonometry
There are some colleagues who believe that the sine, cosine and tangent functions should be intro-
duced via right-angled triangles and then extended to their application to oscillatory motion. Others
believe that the application to oscillatory motion should precede their link to triangles. This Work-
book follows the first approach, but with suitable guidance students following the second approach
can also use it successfully.
This Workbook deals with the areas of right-angled triangles and their solution, trigonometric func-
tions of any angle, including their graphs, simple trigonometric identities, the solution of triangles
without a right angle, the application of trigonometry to the study of wave motion.
In this age of the pocket calculator many students are not familiar with the exact values of the
trigonometric ratios for angles such as 30◦ , 45◦ , 60◦ . Does it matter? The view taken here is that it
does. It is also important to note that the inverse trigonometric functions found by pressing calculator
buttons may not provide the answer required. It is worth emphasising that checking whether a triangle
is right-angled before solving it via sine and cosine rules can save much effort.
These days it might be argued that there is little value in knowing, or using, throwbacks such as the
CAST rule; on the contrary, we argue that such knowledge and usage leads to a greater ‘feel’ for the
trigonometric functions than mere blind button-pressing. The ability to sketch graphs of the basic
trigonometric functions adds to their safe application to problem solving.
How far one should delve into trigonometric identities is a matter for debate but surely everyone
should know the identity sin2 θ + cos2 θ ≡ 1 and its close relatives. An awareness of some of the
addition formulae allows the ‘double angle’ identities to be seen as plausible.
A strategy for the solution of triangles in general, using angle sum, sine rule and cosine rule should
32 HELM (2015):
Workbook 50: Tutor’s Guide
®
be presented. This is a good situation in which to explain the idea of adapting the strategy to
different input information. The fact that the information given does not allow a triangle to be
drawn illustrates the principle that ‘if you can draw the triangle then you can calculate the unknown
sides and angles’. The ambiguous case, presented pictorially first, gives emphasis to recognising that
for an angle < 180◦ , knowing its sine does not define it uniquely (except, of course, for 90◦ ).
This Workbook assumes no previous knowledge of the subject and begins with a discussion of the
trigonometry of the right-angled triangle. More general definitions are then given of the trigonometric
(or circular) functions and the main trigonometric identities are obtained.
The sine rule and cosine rule for triangles are introduced and a careful discussion given of which is
the appropriate rule to use in a given situation.
Detailed worked examples and a generous selection of problems (with answers) are provided at all
stages.
As an application a full section is devoted to properties of sinusoidal waves whilst other smaller
optional engineering examples utilising trigonometry (for example in the diffraction of sound, brake
cables, amplitude modulation and projectile motion) are interspersed at appropriate intervals.
This Workbook is intended to introduce this idea of the ‘Modelling Cycle’. The emphasis is on
‘choosing a function for a model’. Since Workbook 5 is early in the HELM series, it deals only with
models that involve linear, quadratic and trigonometric functions. (The last section in Workbook 6
includes modelling examples that use the logarithmic and exponential functions.) An attempt has
been made to use the ‘modelling’ format in all of the engineering examples in the HELM series.
Following a section on the use of linear functions as models we turn our attention to the use of
quadratic functions. An obvious example is that of projectile motion. Given the relative simplicity
of the quadratic function it is worth examining the assumptions made by using it to model such
situations; how accurate are the predictions from the model and does it provide an exact model,
or merely a very good approximation to reality? To avoid confusion in the case of two-dimensional
projectile motion, it is worth spending time with the example of a stone thrown vertically upwards
distinguishing between the graph of the vertical displacement against time and the actual motion of
the stone.
Then we model oscillatory motion by means of the sine and cosine functions, reinforcing the intro-
duction provided in Workbook 4. Finally, we take an example of the inverse square law model; this
HELM (2015): 33
Section 50.8: Commentaries on Workbooks 1 to 48
is such a widely-applied model that it needs an early mastery.
The definition of the ‘Modelling Cycle’ and the approach adopted are similar to those used in a series
of Open University courses (TM282 Modelling by Mathematics and MST121 Using Mathematics).
These courses cite some engineering examples but, since the intention was to avoid contexts that
required a lot of prior knowledge, several other contexts are used here. For example, the Open
University materials for TM282 use three contextual themes: Vehicle Safety, Town Planning and
Population Growth. Further illustrations of modelling are to be found in the texts for those courses.
More advanced modelling examples may be found in later HELM Workbooks (particularly 34, 47 and
48) and in the following references:
After some examples of functions from the family a2 , the exponential function is introduced by
defining e as the limit of a sequence. A study of the slope of the tangent to curves of the family can
be followed by stating that in the case of the exponential function that slope is equal to the value of
the function at the point of contact. This then allows a generalisation to the slope being proportional
to the value and hence to models of growth and decay, for example Newton’s law of cooling.
The hyperbolic functions can be introduced at this point without too much fuss. Given the contrast
between some of their properties and those of their trigonometric near-namesakes, it might be wise
to hint at their use in parametric coordinates on a hyperbola (hence the trailing h).
The use of the logarithmic function in solving model equations that employ the exponential function
reinforces the concept of an inverse function. The properties of logarithmic functions need treating
with care: the law loga (AB) = loga A + loga B is not true for A and B both negative, for example.
To an extent the material in Section 6.6 on the log-linear transformation duplicates that in earlier
sections of the Workbook. However this section provides an alternative approach and illustrates its
use in various modelling contexts. Indeed the emphasis in Section 6.6 is on the use of exponential
and logarithm functions for modelling.
Workbook 7: Matrices
The algebra of matrices can be a dry topic unless the student sees that matrices have a vital role to
play in the solution of engineering problems. Of course, one obvious application is in the solution of
34 HELM (2015):
Workbook 50: Tutor’s Guide
®
simultaneous linear equations, but there are others, for example in the description of communication
networks, and at least one such example should be introduced at the outset.
Of necessity, some groundwork must be carried out and this can be tedious; where possible, emphasise
the ‘natural’ definitions, for example addition of two matrices of the same shape; then ask how they
would add together say
1 2 3 2 3
and . In new territory nothing can be taken for granted.
3 1 2 1 2
Matrix multiplication is a strange process. The multiplication of two-by-two matrices can be illus-
trated as representing two successive rotations (use simple angles). The generalisation to three-by-
three matrices is a hard one, so it is important to emphasise the scalar product basis of deriving the
two-by-two entries e.g. for the product C = AB, c11 = a11 b11 + a12 b21 etc. And, of course, the
shock to the system of non-commutativity and results such as AB = 0 does not necessarily imply
that either A = 0 or B = 0 (or both) should be exploited. Again it is important to give simple
examples of where multiplication is not possible then give them back their confidence by giving them
simple guidelines on how to negotiate the minefield.
A simple introduction to the concept of the determinant of a square matrix and some simple properties
of determinants should be accompanied by an illustration of how tedious it can be to evaluate a
determinant with even four rows. Please emphasise that there is a different notation for determinants
than that for matrices and that they are not interchangeable.
The inverse of a two-by-two matrix is best introduced by the idea of reversing a rotation. The
fact that even some square matrices do not have an inverse must be justified. That we say “the
inverse matrix, when one exists,” is a useful vehicle to explain the vital importance of existence
and uniqueness theorems. Emphasise that division of two matrices is NOT an operation. Build
up confidence by finding inverses of two-by-two matrices before embarking on the three-by-three
examples; these might be postponed until simultaneous linear equations are introduced. (Workbook
9). The contrast between the Gauss elimination and the determinant method should be drawn.
Whilst students should be made aware of both methods they should be allowed to use the method
which they prefer.
Cramer’s rule provides a simple approach to understanding the nature of solution of two equations in
two unknowns and is easily extended to three equations in three unknowns. It should be noted how
much more arithmetic is involved and that extension to larger systems is really impracticable.
The use of the inverse matrix provides an alternative approach, which has useful links to the underlying
theory but is not much help in the cases where no unique solution exists.
In contrast, the method of Gauss elimination can, properly handled, lead to useful information when
HELM (2015): 35
Section 50.8: Commentaries on Workbooks 1 to 48
there is no unique solution, especially if there are an infinite number of solutions. These days, students
are not fluent in handling arithmetic fractions and care must be taken to avoid examples, which lead
to anything but the simplest fractions. The method provides a variety of routes to the solution and
this fact may cause students to be wary of using it. A warning could be usefully issued by showing
the exact solution to a system of ill-conditioned equation alongside a Gauss ‘solution’.
Workbook 9: Vectors
In this Workbook we provide a careful introductory account of vectors together with a few basic
applications in science and engineering. The approach is relatively conventional, starting with the
elementary ideas, approached graphically, of vector addition and subtraction and the multiplication of
a vector by a scalar. Applications involving the addition and resolution of forces and a discussion of
the forces on an aeroplane in steady flight are provided. (Some elementary knowledge of trigonometry
is required here and later in the Workbook.) An opportunity can be taken to discuss the contrast
between displacement of an object (vector) and the distance it travels (scalar).
We underline vectors, which better reflects how students and lecturers write them (rather than
emboldening them as is done in textbooks). Note that we write dr/dt (underlining r only) but dr
(underlining the expression dr).
Cartesian representation of vectors, firstly in two and then in three dimensions is covered including
position vectors. The basic unit vectors are denoted by i, j and k . It is important not to rush
through the two-dimensional case: once this is well understood the three-dimensional case can be
sold as a straightforward extension (and the reason for ‘the adding of an extra term’ allowing us to
move into three dimensions can be explained).
A careful coverage of the scalar (or dot) product of two vectors and its properties, together with
some applications in basic electrostatics, is followed by the corresponding vector (or cross) product.
Carefully explain why a × b = −b × a; it is a result to frighten the faint-hearted. In the latter
the determinant form for evaluation in Cartesian coordinates is used and simple applications to the
torque of a force are discussed. Triple products are covered only in exercises. Many students find
difficulty with problems in three-dimensional statics in their engineering modules and the use of the
vector product in tackling these problems can be a good selling-point here (case study or coursework,
perhaps).
The final section involves some geometrical aspects of vectors particularly direction cosines and
direction ratios and vector equations of lines and planes. The simplicity of approach using vectors
can be highlighted by contrasting it with the alternative approach.
36 HELM (2015):
Workbook 50: Tutor’s Guide
®
The Argand diagram provides a useful means of visualisation of complex numbers but care must be
taken to stress that a point on the diagram represents a complex number and is not the number
itself. The same point can be made when representing a complex number as a vector.
The Workbook initially covers the algebra of complex numbers in Cartesian form and glances briefly
at the solution of polynomial equations with real coefficients. Given the poor grasp of real number
algebra among many students, it is wise not too assume too much algebraic fluency, so take it slowly.
Assuming some knowledge of trigonometric identities allows the introduction of the polar form and its
advantage over the Cartesian form when carrying out multiplication and division (and taking powers).
A simple application to rotations about a point provides a gentle illustration.
Use of the exponential form leads to a discussion of the relations between trigonometric and hyperbolic
functions and identities and the Workbook concludes with De Moivre’s theorem for finding powers
and roots of complex numbers. It is worth remarking that the nth roots of a given complex number ◦
share the same modulus and therefore lie on a circle in the Argand diagram and are spaced 360 n
apart along the circumference.
Many of today’s students seem to have difficulty understanding the concept of rate of change and
this needs careful attention. The average rate of change of a function over a given interval should
be introduced and the increment in the independent variable denoted by h: the use of δx can come
dy
later - to make plausible the notation . Linking the instantaneous rate of change to the gradient
dx
of the tangent should be done at the same time.
It is important to define carefully the terms ‘differentiable’, derived function’ and ‘derivative’ and
to distinguish clearly between them. It is also straightforward to give examples where a function is
not differentiable at a point: the modulus function, ramp function and unit step function are good
examples.
Familiarisation with the table of basic derivatives (derived functions) should be encouraged and the
results interpreted on graphs of the appropriate functions. Do stress that angles in this context
MUST be measured in radians.
A graphical explanation of how the derivatives of f (kx), kf (x), f (x + k), f (x) + k are related to that
of f (x) has been found to help. Should it be necessary to explain why the derivative of a constant
function is zero? Probably it is.
The rule for differentiating a linear combination of two functions (and the special cases of sum,
difference and scalar multiple) is reasonably intuitive and need not be overstated. Confidence is the
HELM (2015): 37
Section 50.8: Commentaries on Workbooks 1 to 48
keyword here.
The second derivative could be presented in terms of displacement, velocity and acceleration - and a
d2 y
good time to explain that x is not the only notation for an independent variable. The notation 2
dx
etc. does seem clumsy and needs justification.
The remaining sections of the Workbook deal with the techniques of differentiating products and
quotients, the chain rule and parametric and implicit differentiation. The examples chosen must be
simple illustrations; don’t lose the wood of the technique in the trees of awkward differentiation. A
useful approach is to illustrate some applications of one technique before moving onto more advanced
techniques; in particular the last three techniques and especially the last two can be postponed until
earlier techniques have been mastered and time allowed for their absorption.
Most students have an imperfect understanding of the definitions of local maximum, local minimum
and point of inflection. Simple graphs can be used to illustrate these features.
Of the following three statements only the first two are known with any certainty by most students:
(3) If f 00 (a) = 0 , then f (x) has minimum or a maximum or a point of inflection when x = a.
Many students think (3) always leads to a point of inflection but the graph of f (x) = x4 clearly
shows this to be untrue when x = 0.
Another misconception is that a point of inflection requires f 0 (a) = 0 . This is not true as can easily
be seen, for example, on the sine curve. This raises another point - for any continuous function there
is always a point of inflection between every local minimum and local maximum. The graph below
highlights these features.
38 HELM (2015):
Workbook 50: Tutor’s Guide
®
Inflection Inflection
x
Minimum Minimum
Students all too readily turn to the calculus when needing to find maxima and minima. There are,
however, cases when alternative approaches are simpler, quicker or more informative:
Example 1
Example 2
Using the trigonometric identity sin(A + B) ≡ sin A cos B + cos A sin B and utilising the triangle in
the diagram we have
HELM (2015): 39
Section 50.8: Commentaries on Workbooks 1 to 48
√
13
3
√
2 3
f (x) = 13 √ sin x + √ cos x
13 13
√
= 13[cos α sin x + sin α cos x]
α
√
= 13 sin(x + α) 2
√ π
This clearly has a maximum value of 13 at x = − α (for example).
2
One point of caution should be stated. When applying differentiation to find for example the di-
mensions of a rectangle of fixed perimeter and maximum area students often get confused between
the graph of the function being maximised and the geometry of the problem. It is also useful to
remember that differentiation can find a local maximum and physical considerations can be brought
in to justify the term “absolute” maximum. Also, in some physical problems, with the knowledge of
the behaviour of the function at the physical extremes of the independent variable the nature of the
single stationary point can be decided without the need to differentiate a second time, or use the
first derivative test.
The Newton-Raphson method is straightforward to derive and relatively easy to apply. Mention should
be made of its proneness to failure under certain circumstances. The presentation of curvature should
be illustrated by simple examples so that the student can relate algebraic results to the graph of each
function. The differentiation of vectors in Cartesian component form follows an intuitive path and
this should not be clouded by too much rigour.
The
Z 2 extension to definite integrals by itself is not too abstruse but the notation in the statement
2
3x2 dx = x3 1 = 8 − 1 = 7 is quite deep and needs a gentle presentation.
1
Surely one of the great moments in learning mathematics is to realise that the area bounded by the
curve y = f (x) , the x-axis and the ordinates x = a and x = b can be found exactly by evaluating
40 HELM (2015):
Workbook 50: Tutor’s Guide
®
Z b
the definite integral f (x)dx. Make the most of that moment. Simple examples, please. The
a
area bounded by the sine curve over a quarter-period has a satisfyingly simple value.
Further techniques can be postponed until some further simple applications such as those in Workbook
14 have been looked at.
The techniques of integration by parts, by substitution and by partial fractions are best treated in
two stages; first use really simple examples in order to allow students to gain confidence in the basics
of each technique, preferably with illustrative examples from engineering to demonstrate that their
use is not just ‘pure mathematics’, then revisit with more advanced versions of the techniques.
As a final phase, integration of functions involving more complicated trigonometric expressions can
be tackled.
The importance of recognising a definite integral as the limit of a sum cannot be over-emphasised:
it allows the correct establishment of a definite integral whose value is that of the physical quantity
concerned. The remainder of the solution is the use of techniques of integration met in Workbook
13. The first examples of each application should lead to very simple integrands. The results should
always be examined to see whether they are sensible in the light of the problem.
The mean value of the sine function over a quarter-period, over a half-period and over a full period
can be compared and the need for a more meaningful measure of the ‘average’ of the sine function
suggested. Of course, the root-mean-square value is more tricky to evaluate and the double angle
formula should be provided as a tool to be picked up and used.
When finding volumes of solids of revolution the cylinder, cone and sphere are the obvious examples
and the placing of an axis of symmetry along the x-axis should be highlighted. Careful explanation
of the division of the solid into the union of a set of non-overlapping discs should be followed by
remarking how an approximating sum can be transformed into a definite integral yielding the exact
answer - one of the glories of the calculus.
Approach the problem of finding the length of arc by first using a line parallel to the x-axis, then a line
inclined to the x-axis and thus make plausible the length of a general arc. The resulting formula can
then be shown to yield the same results as in the first two cases. The formulae for this application
and that of surface area only yield simple integrations in a few cases and it is worthwhile pointing out
that other examples may require much more complicated methods of integration, or perhaps need to
employ numerical approximate methods.
The integration of vectors in Cartesian coordinate form is relatively straightforward and can be dealt
HELM (2015): 41
Section 50.8: Commentaries on Workbooks 1 to 48
with immediately after differentiating them - use velocity goes to displacement as a suitable vehicle
for discussion. When discussing the centre of mass of a plane uniform lamina the use of symmetry
is a vital ingredient; sensible positioning of the axes may simplify the resulting integrations, not least
finding the value of the area itself. Many students do not have a grasp of the idea of a moment and a
matchstick model is not too elementary a teaching aid. Finally, the calculation of moment of inertia
is not a great leap mathematically but does need a careful foundation of the physical concept. Many
students have only a rudimentary knowledge of mechanical principles and very little can be assumed.
In the first section the concept of sequences and their convergence or otherwise is introduced. Arith-
metic and geometrical sequences (progressions) are covered and formulae obtained for the sum of n
terms in each case.
We then move on to more general infinite series. The meaning of convergence is carefully explained
in terms of partial sums. The ratio test for the convergence of series of positive terms is explained
together with a brief mention of other convergence tests and the ratio test is also used to briefly
consider conditional or absolute convergence for more general series.
A brief section follows on the binomial series and the binomial theorem for positive integers. This is
followed by a section on the convergence of power series in which the idea of the radius of convergence
is carefully explained. Various properties of convergent power series are also discussed such as their
differentiation and integration.
The most useful aspect of convergent power series for applications (their ability to represent functions)
is the subject of the final section in which both Maclaurin series and, briefly, Taylor series are discussed.
In the second section polar co-ordinates are introduced and simple curves whose equations are given
in polars are described while the equations of the standard conics in polars are also explained.
Finally parametric descriptions of curves are covered including those for the standard conic sections.
The prerequisites for this Workbook are relatively modest, with some basic algebra including comple-
tion of the square and algebraic fractions and knowledge of trigonometric functions being required
42 HELM (2015):
Workbook 50: Tutor’s Guide
®
for the first two sections. Knowledge of hyperbolic functions and simple differentiation is required
for the final section but detailed discussion of parametric differentiation is covered in Workbook 12.
The Workbook contains a good number of fully worked examples and many exercises for all of which
answers are provided.
not every equation of that form represents a conic. (The equation x2 + 1 = 0 is an obvious counter-
example!)
Parabola: AC − B 2 = 0 [eccentricity e = 1]
Definition of conic
A conic is the locus of a point, which moves in a plane so that its distance from a fixed point called
the focus bears a constant ratio called the eccentricity to its distance from a fixed straight line in
the plane called the directrix.
If (p, q) are the coordinates of the focus, e is the eccentricity, and ax + by + c = 0 is the equation
of the directrix then the equation of the conic is
HELM (2015): 43
Section 50.8: Commentaries on Workbooks 1 to 48
A = a2 + b2 − a2 e2
B = −abe2
C = a2 + b2 − b2 e2
D = −p(a2 + b2 ) − ace2
E = −q(a2 + b2 ) − bce2
F = (a2 + b2 )(p2 + q 2 ) − c2 e2
The heart of the text is the section on partial differentiation (for which, naturally) a basic knowledge
of differentiation in the case of one independent variable is needed. The material is actually quite
straightforward and proceeds only to second partial derivatives including mixed derivatives.
The third section covers stationary points for functions of two variables with computer drawn diagrams
to illustrate the various possibilities. The location of stationary points using partial differentiation is
carefully discussed and the second derivative tests to determine the nature of these points clearly set
out but not proved.
The final section covers errors and percentage changes using partial differentiation. Many worked
examples including applications are provided at appropriate intervals.
It is difficult to give a watertight yet straightforward explanation of the tangent surface in 3-D
although the concept is readily understandable. We have therefore not attempted to be rigorous
here.
The first section introduces ODEs through a model and then discusses the basic concepts of order,
type and general solution together with the need for additional condition(s) to obtain a unique
solution.
44 HELM (2015):
Workbook 50: Tutor’s Guide
®
The section on first order ODEs covers separation of variables and the conversion of linear ODEs
into exact equations of the form
d
(y × f (x)) = g(x)
dx
As would be expected in an introductory treatment, second order ODEs are restricted to the linear
constant coefficient type but these of course have many applications. Both homogeneous and non-
homogeneous types are fully discussed. Knowledge of complex numbers is useful here for dealing
with forcing functions involving sinusoids. A number of engineering application examples from electric
circuit theory are fully worked out.
The final consolidating section of the Workbook returns to the applications aspect with, among other
topics, a reasonably full discussion of mechanical oscillations.
h(t) = f (t)u(t)
where u(t) is the unit step function. Simple properties of causal functions are studied as are delayed
functions of the form
f (t − a)u(t − a)
The definition of the Laplace Transform is used to transform various common functions including
delayed functions. Inversion of transforms is demonstrated using partial fractions (an outline knowl-
edge of which is assumed). Introduction of the shift theorems both in t and the Laplace variable s
allows a wider range of transforms and inversions to be dealt with.
The Laplace Transform of derivatives is covered and this leads on naturally to the solution of ordinary
differential equations and systems of these. Specific electrical and mechanical engineering examples
are demonstrated. A section on convolution integrals and the time convolution theorem is provided
and the concept of transfer or system function for linear systems follows naturally. The negative
HELM (2015): 45
Section 50.8: Commentaries on Workbooks 1 to 48
feedback system is investigated. These application topics enhance the value of the Workbook in a
specifically engineering context.
The Workbook begins with a basic discussion of sequences and simple difference equations before
moving on to a full discussion of the z-transform and derivations of the transforms of important
sequences. The transform is introduced ab initio with no previous knowledge of Laplace transforms
required.
The shift properties of the z-transform are fully discussed and applied to the solution of linear
constant coefficient difference equations. Inversion of z-transforms by partial fractions and by the
use of residues is covered although no detailed knowledge of Complex Variable Theory is needed.
A detailed application of the solution of difference equations to obtain currents in a ladder network
provides a good consolidating example.
A full section is devoted to the concept of transfer (or system) function of discrete systems and the
time convolution theorem is also discussed in some detail.
A final (optional) section briefly extends the theory to sampled functions and the relation between
the z and Laplace transforms is finally obtained.
CX = K
AX = λX
and calculation of the eigenvalues λ and the eigenvectors X is demonstrated both using the charac-
teristic equation and later by numerical methods.
A detailed section on applications considers diagonalisation of matrices with distinct eigenvalues and
this leads on to solving systems of differential equations (such as coupled spring systems) by the
‘decoupling’ method.
46 HELM (2015):
Workbook 50: Tutor’s Guide
®
Further applicable theory deals with the pleasant properties of symmetric matrices in this context
and an outline is given of the situations that can arise with general matrices possessing repeated
eigenvalues.
A student who has mastered the material of this Workbook is in a strong position to study specific
applications such as advanced dynamics and modern control.
An introductory section outlines the basic jargon of the topic (frequency, harmonics etc) and then,
after a discussion of the relevant orthogonality properties, we show how to obtain Fourier series for
functions of period 2π and then of more general period.
The particular form of the Fourier series for functions which are odd or are even is covered and
this leads on, after a brief discussion of convergence, to obtaining Fourier sine or cosine series for
functions defined over a limited interval.
The final section of the Workbook gives a detailed coverage of the complex exponential form of Fourier
series together with Parseval’s theorem and a brief discussion of electrical engineering applications.
Fourier transforms are covered separately in Workbook 24, and the use of Fourier series in connection
with partial differential equations is introduced in Workbook 25.
The Fourier transforms of common signals such as exponential and rectangular are derived from the
definition after which the main properties of the transform are obtained. The time and frequency
shift (or translation) properties, the frequency and time differentiation properties and the form of the
transform for even and for odd functions are among the topics discussed here.
Brief plausible discussions of the Fourier transforms of the unit impulse function (also known as the
Dirac delta function) and of the Heaviside unit step function are given in the final section.
A generous selection of worked examples and of exercises (with outline answers) is provided. There
HELM (2015): 47
Section 50.8: Commentaries on Workbooks 1 to 48
is little specific discussion of applications of Fourier transforms but a student who has mastered the
contents of the Workbook would be in a good position to use them in specific fields.
The main PDEs studied - the two-dimensional Laplace equation, the one-dimensional wave equation
and the one-dimensional diffusion (or heat conduction) equation - are fully discussed (although not
derived in detail) so that the student knows how the detailed mathematics to follow may be applied.
Various types of initial and boundary conditions are mentioned.
The separation of variables method of solution for PDEs is the core of the Workbook and this is
developed carefully, initially looking at problems where Fourier Series do not arise. Emphasis is given
to the fact that the method is a logical sequence of steps relevant to a wide range of problems. The
Workbook concludes with problems where Fourier Series are required, the latter being the subject of
Workbook 23 in this series.
Starting with some simple complex functions and their evaluation, the idea of the limit of a function
as the input variable tends to a special value is best tackled by choosing examples where the limit is
path-dependent, followed by one where it is not; in the latter case the fact that the limit does not
depend on the two or three paths chosen does not imply per se that the limit is path-independent,
and raises the question as to how to be sure that it is path-independent. The derivative of a complex
function should follow, with particular emphasis being placed on the idea of a singular point and on
the similarity between processes of differentiating a complex function and a real function at a regular
point.
The use of the Cauchy-Riemann equations to answer the question of analyticity of a function should
be a demonstration of the elegance of this area of mathematics, and leads nicely into the idea of
conjugate harmonic functions. The explanation of the role of these functions in an application of
Laplace’s equation should be taken. The usefulness of a mapping being conformal will have more
impact if related to an example from the appropriate engineering discipline without the need to
attempt the solution of that example. With what could be a relatively abstract area of mathematics,
the aim should be first to show relevance, in the hope of producing sufficient interest to go through
the necessary algebra.
48 HELM (2015):
Workbook 50: Tutor’s Guide
®
When introducing the standard functions of a complex variable, the similarities to and differences
from the real counterparts need careful treatment. The case of multiple solutions to the equation
ez = 1 contrasts nicely with the unique solution to the equation ex = 1.
Section 4 gives the reader a first glance at complex integration. The message is ‘keep the integrands
simple’. Again, it is useful to give an example where the integral is path-dependent and one where it
appears to be path-independent, and raise the question of how we could verify the path-independence
in any particular case. This area of mathematics is awash with elegant theorems and may appear
daunting to students not weaned on theorems at school; a gentle approach is recommended.
The beauty of the simplicity of Cauchy’s theorem and its wide applicability has the potential to excite
the imagination of even weak students, if sensitively presented. A gentle gradation of examples is
especially called for here. The extension to Cauchy’s Integral Formula should follow immediately to
link the two results at the earliest opportunity.
The classification of singularities of a complex function is a natural consequence of its Laurent series,
which in turn is a neat extension of its Taylor series. Experience shows that Taylor series can be
particularly daunting and the use of simple functions and a relatively low expectation of the depth of
coverage at a first run-through is advisable.
The residue theorem can be introduced by means of simple examples and forms a suitable point at
which to conclude the first venture into functions of a complex variable.
The aim throughout should be to enthuse the student by the elegance and simplicity of the topic and
not go too deeply into each sub-topic. Harder examples are best tackled when the imagination has
been fired and this is done by keeping the examples simple; far better not to tackle harder examples
at this stage than to turn the students off.
The comparison with “single” integration (i.e. volume under a surface plays an analagous role to
area under a curve) is quite deliberate as are the use of the terms “inner” and “outer” integrals
and the demonstration of double integration over a rectangular region (27.1) before going onto non-
rectangular regions (27.2). The majority of the examples given in a rectangular geometry are in terms
of variables x and y, reflecting the fact that most of the applications given involve integration over
an area or volume. However, at least one example (in 27.1) draws attention to the use of alternative
notation in terms of s and t.
Similarly, most examples in a circular geometry make use of r (or ρ ) and θ (or in spherical geometry,
r, θ and φ ). However, the attention drawn to s and t in 27.1 reinforces to the student that there
is nothing ”sacred” about the variable names used. Similarly, while the notation dA or dV is used
to represent an area element or a volume element, it should be appreciated that other notation
could be used. While 27.4 is concerned with the Jacobian and change of variables, it was felt the
transformation to plane polar coordinates was sufficiently universal to allow this special case in 27.2
HELM (2015): 49
Section 50.8: Commentaries on Workbooks 1 to 48
and let 27.4 show this case in context and look at other possible transformations.
Note that here in discussing Jacobians the notation of two vertical bars is used in close proximity for
two quite different concepts: modulus and determinant.
However, two sets of notation are used for the vector differential operator i.e. the use of the words
grad f , div F and curl F are sometimes used rather than the ∇ notation ( ∇f, ∇ · F and ∇ × F ).
It was felt important to introduce students to both notational forms as the word notation often puts
the mathematics in more of a physical or engineering context while the operator often simplifies
calculation.
Originally, 28.3 on vector derivatives in orthogonal curvilinear coordinates was intended to be more
general i.e. to mention cylindrical polar coordinates and spherical polar coordinates in the context of
being special cases and to look at a few more coordinate systems and how to calculate relevant vector
derivatives. However, pressure on space did not allow this and the Section was revised to include
only cylindrical and spherical polar coordinate systems. [For these other cases, refer to Handbook of
Mathematical Formulas and Integrals, Alan Jeffrey, Academic Press.]
In 28.3, unit vectors ρ̂, φ̂ and ẑ (cylindrical polar coordinates) and r̂, θ̂ and φ̂ (spherical polar coordi-
nates) are used. Of course, these are equivalent to ρ̂, φ̂ and i, j and k for Cartesian coordinates. In
fact, the vectors ẑ and k are the same vector but the notational form chosen fits the form of the other
vectors under consideration i.e. k for cartesian coordinates and ẑ for cylindrical polar coordinates.
A possible challenge when carrying out integrals over a sloping area is of expressing dS correctly in
terms of dx and dy (or dz and one of dx or dy). This point has been emphasized in the text and in
a couple of examples.
50 HELM (2015):
Workbook 50: Tutor’s Guide
®
The convention used was that the mathematical expressions were referred to as theorems e.g. Gauss’
theorem while the term law was reserved for the application to electromagnetism (see Engineering
Example).
Clearly, these topics (particularly Green’s theorem) could be mentioned in greater depth.
LU decomposition
In principle one could solve simultaneous equations by inverting the matrices involved, and there is
an explicit algorithm for finding inverses. However, while this is fine in theory, the algorithm involves
many determinants and as the determinant of an n × n matrix can have n! terms, this is not really
practical for even modest values of n. The L-U decomposition is much simpler, and you could if you
wished ask students to estimate the number of operations involved and compare it with inverting.
Matrix norms
The condition number gives an estimate of the accuracy of the solution process of a matrix equation,
in that, very roughly you might expect the errors in the solution to be the size of those on the right
hand side multiplied by the condition number. For square symmetric real matrices, the choice of
norm which gives the smallest condition number will make it the ratio of the eigenvalues of largest
and smallest modulus: this will make sense only to students who know something about eigenvalues.
Iterative methods
Jacobi and Gauss Seidel iteration: see Engineering Example 1 for a case where these take a long time
to converge.
HELM (2015): 51
Section 50.8: Commentaries on Workbooks 1 to 48
For students whose background is suitable one can mention approximation by other types of functions
(e.g. trigonometric polynomials), or functions, which share properties which the solution is known to
have. Least squares approximation of straight lines is another approach: a polynomial of degree 1 is
being made to fit the data as well as possible. One could use the best least squares approximation of
N points by polynomials of some chosen degree, to make the answer less susceptible to changes in
the data. Exploring the effects here with a real set of data relevant to the students might be useful.
Numerical integration
Consider the size of the errors for the composite trapezium (ask the students to estimate it). In
many cases this is small enough that nothing more sophisticated is needed, although there are more
accurate ways of doing numerical integration: they are also more complicated.
Nonlinear equations
The bisection methods, although slow, will always work. Newton-Raphson is much more efficient, if
the starting point is “close enough”, but requires the derivative to be calculated. It can be shown (and
Figure 11 almost does this) that Newton-Raphson will work provided the second derivative does not
change sign in the area considered. There are more complicated ways of guaranteeing convergence
if the derivative does change sign.
For students and teachers willing to investigate this, try Newton-Raphson for solving x3 − x = 0 ,
with various starting points. Which root does it converge to? This is quite sensitive near 0, where
the second derivative does change sign.
The sections on parabolic and hyperbolic PDEs, both of which usually arise in the form of initial-value
problems, illustrate the care needed to make the methods work on particular PDEs, and that the
same method will not necessarily work on other types of PDE.
52 HELM (2015):
Workbook 50: Tutor’s Guide
®
Elliptic PDEs
These normally arise in the form of boundary-value problems, and the Workbook gives methods for
Laplace’s and Poisson’s equations, and that it is known that these converge. The matrices involved
are all “sparse” in that they have a structure and most of the entries are zero. Finding ways of
exploiting the structure of the matrices can lead to improved numerical methods for their solution.
Again the techniques of Workbook 30 are important, and the students should be able to see that
further progress may need more attention to the methods of solving set of equations, or of matrix
iteration.
Engineering students often need help in coming to terms with these concepts and with the idea
that the “answer” to questions is often a statement, of one type or another, about the remaining
uncertainty in a situation rather than a fixed value for some physical quantity. Physical analogy
or “feel” does not always come so easily with such ideas. In students’ efforts to deal with this,
motivation is often of great importance and motivation is easier when the student sees the material
as relevant. This is one reason why we have attempted to provide examples and explanations, which
relate to engineering. It would, of course, be impractical to provide examples of every topic drawn
from every specialised branch of engineering but students should be able to be less narrow than this
and tutors may be able to provide additional, more specialised, examples by changing the “stories”
in some of ours. The second reason for trying to use relevant engineering examples and illustrations
HELM (2015): 53
Section 50.8: Commentaries on Workbooks 1 to 48
is to help students to attain that “feel” which will help them to grasp what is going on. This is
made easier if they can relate probability statements, for example, to frequencies of events of familiar
types. So, for example, it may be easier at first to think of 100 light bulbs, or whatever, of which
“on average” one in twenty, that is 5, might be expected to fail before a certain time, rather than
talk more abstractly of a probability of 0.05. Similarly, it might help to think of a product with two
components, A and B, where one in ten products “on average” has a defect in component A and
one in five products “on average” has a defect in component B, regardless of the state of component
A. Then, out of 100 products, we might expect on average ‘one in five of one in ten products’, that
is one in 50, to have defects in both components.
There is more than one school of thought in probability and statistics but presenting both of the major
approaches in introductory material such as this would risk causing confusion. Although the Bayesian
approach has made major advances in recent years, it is probably still true that the approach which
engineering graduates will be expected to have learned is the more traditional frequentist approach.
Therefore probability is presented in terms of limiting relative frequency and statistical inference is
presented in terms of the familiar ideas of estimators, confidence intervals and significance tests.
Thus properties can be explained in terms of long-run frequencies. This is not too difficult in the
context of a mass-production industry, for example, although care is still required in explaining exactly
what is meant by a confidence interval or the interpretation of a non-significant result in a test. In
branches of engineering concerned with one-off constructions, the application of relative-frequency
ideas requires more careful thought and abstraction although, even here, it is often the case that, for
example, large numbers of similar components are used.
Students should be encouraged at an early stage to distinguish between a population and a sample,
between the (usually unknown) value of a population parameter and its estimate and, of course,
between an estimator, that is a random function, and an estimate, that is a particular value. This
becomes particularly important from Workbook 40 onwards. Experience shows that students do not
always find this easy and often fall into the trap of believing that the data tell us that µ = 1.63 or
that the null hypothesis is (definitely) false.
This is, of course, an introductory service course in probability and statistics and it is neither possible
nor desirable to attempt to achieve either the breadth or depth that would be given in a course for
specialist statistics students. Inevitably there are topics which we do not cover but which may be
encountered by engineering students at some time. We feel that the important thing to be achieved
in a course such as this is a grasp of the basic ideas and concepts. Once these are understood,
coping with new distributions and procedures, perhaps with the aid of suitable computer software
and, where appropriate, specialist advice, can often be relatively straightforward.
In the modern world, statistical calculations are usually done with a computer and we expect that
students will learn how to do some calculations this way. However it is also useful from a learning
point of view to do some, relatively simple, calculations without the aid of a computer program.
When a computer is used, it is best to use special statistical software. There are many packages
available and many of these are easy to use for beginners, for example Minitab. Some excellent
software, e.g. R, is available free of charge on the Web though non-specialist students might not find
this quite as convenient to use. Having said this, many students will have access to a spreadsheet
program and may prefer to use this. Most of the calculations described in the HELM Workbooks are
possible without too much difficulty using popular spreadsheet software. Some engineering students
may well be using, other software such as Matlab in other parts of their courses. Matlab also provides
54 HELM (2015):
Workbook 50: Tutor’s Guide
®
statistical and graphics facilities and, if the students are using it anyway, it may be a sensible option.
Few engineering students should have difficulty with the mathematics in the statistics Workbooks
(especially if they have the benefit of the HELM mathematics Workbooks!). Experience suggests
that difficulty is more common with the underlying statistical and probabilistic concepts.
Some of the Figures and Examples are in terms of electrical items such as switches and relays wired
together in series and/or parallel. Even though the diagrams are straightforward, care should be
exercised to ensure that the student is familiar with and understands these diagrams. No knowledge
of circuit theory as such is assumed but it is possible that some students may not understand the
ideas involved in series and parallel circuit wiring, for example. It is hoped that this will not be a
problem for engineering students!
The second section of Workbook 36 is aptly titled “Exploring Data”. This is important. The
material enables the student to avoid the twin pitfalls of simply taking data either at their face value
or accepting them simply as a mass of meaningless figures. By using the techniques outlined in this
section of Workbook 36, the student should begin to develop the ability to “look into” a data set
and draw tentative conclusions prior to any attempt to analyse the data. This also has the benefit of
allowing the student to comment on the possible validity of any conclusions reached using statistical
analysis.
HELM (2015): 55
Section 50.8: Commentaries on Workbooks 1 to 48
the Poisson distribution. This latter distribution is looked at in two distinct ways, firstly as a viable
approximation to the binomial distribution, a role in which it can save the user a large amount of
tedious arithmetic normally without significantly reducing the accuracy of the answers obtained. The
second way in which the Poisson distribution is considered is as a distribution in its own right used
to describe the occurrence of events by the so-called Poisson process.
The Workbook concludes with a short section concerning the hypergeometric distribution. This has
applications in, for example, acceptance sampling where, because we are sampling without replace-
ment from a finite batch, the results of individual trials, e.g. of whether an item is defective, are
not independent. This is in contrast to the usual assumptions underlying the binomial distribution.
The distribution of the numbers of defective and acceptable items in a sample from a batch may
seem to be of little direct interest. However, when we turn the question round from “Given certain
numbers within the batch, what is the probability of observing x?” to the inferential question, “Given
observation x, what can we learn about the rest of the batch?” then the hypergeometric distribution
turns out to be very relevant. It will also reappear in Workbook 42 in the context of the test for no
association in contingency tables.
The Workbook then turns its attention to two distributions in very common use, the uniform distri-
bution and the exponential distribution. In introducing the exponential distribution, we also begin
the development of applications to reliability and lifetimes. The statistical analysis of the nature of
the expected lifetime of a product has huge relevance to the industrial applications of statistics and
for this reason the exponential distribution is worthy of close study. The concept of a distribution
function can be explained in terms of a lifetime distribution and this can then lead to the idea of a
probability density function. Analogy with physical mass density can also be helpful.
The second section of the Workbook builds on the foundations laid in Workbook 37 concerning
the binomial distribution. Here we look at how the normal distribution can by used to approximate
56 HELM (2015):
Workbook 50: Tutor’s Guide
®
the binomial distribution provided that the conditions are appropriate. This application can save an
enormous amount of arithmetic without loss of accuracy when applied properly.
Finally, this Workbook looks at practical situations whose description involves sums and differences of
random variables. Without a working knowledge of the behaviour of these quantities, unacceptable
restrictions have to be placed on the range of applications, which an engineer (or anyone else!) is
able to consider.
Concepts of inference can often be difficult for students to grasp at first since students are often
unused to dealing with uncertainty and questions where the answer is a statement about something
which we do not know for certain. For this reason it is important to be careful with the distinctions
between, for example, population parameters and sample statistics.
As the title of this Workbook implies, it is concerned with two crucially important aspects of statistics,
namely samples, their properties and their use in estimating population parameters. The student
should realise that it is often impractical or impossible to deal with a complete population. It is
usually the case that the parameters of a population - the mean and variance for example - have
to be estimated by using information which is available from a sample or samples taken from the
population. Properties of estimators: bias, consistency and efficiency, are introduced. It is important
at this stage to make sure that students understand the distinction between population and sample
and between estimator and estimate and the concept of a sampling distribution.
Constructing a confidence interval for the variance of a normal population involves the use of the Chi-
squared distribution. An introduction in sufficient detail is given to enable the student to gain a good
level of understanding of this distribution and its application to finding confidence intervals involving
estimates of the variance of a normal population. Given that a great many practical situations involve
statistical estimation it will be appreciated that this Workbook deserves the very close attention of
the student.
HELM (2015): 57
Section 50.8: Commentaries on Workbooks 1 to 48
Workbook 41: Hypothesis Testing
A solid understanding of the theory and techniques contained in this Workbook is essential to any
student wishing to apply statistics to real-world engineering problems. Many students find the material
challenging, one of the reasons being that work on hypothesis testing is often attempted on the basis
of half-understood and half-remembered theory and techniques which necessarily underpin the subject.
The student should already be familiar with the material in the HELM statistics series concerning
the following topics:
• sampling;
In this Workbook it is assumed that students have some understanding and a working familiarity with
all the above topics. Remember that no attempt is made in this Workbook to teach those topics
and that coverage of them will be found elsewhere in the HELM statistics series.
Since many students find some difficulty with this topic, it is strongly suggested that the worked
examples are given particular attention and that all of the student Tasks are fully worked. The
students should not allow themselves to fall into the trap of simply looking up the solution to a
problem if they cannot successfully complete it. Suggest that the students keep a record of their
attempts to solve problems in order that any lack of understanding may be identified and rectified.
Even published scientific literature often contains suggestions of misinterpretation of the results of
significance tests. It should be emphasised that a significance test measures (in a particular sense)
the evidence against a null hypothesis. A significant result means that we have “strong” evidence
against a null hypothesis but not usually certainty. A non-significant result simply means that we do
not have such strong evidence. This may be because the null hypothesis is true or it may be that we
have just not obtained enough data.
Essentially, the first section of the Workbook is concerned with making decisions as to whether or
not a given set of data follow a given distribution (say normal or Poisson) sufficiently closely to be
regarded as a sample taken from such a population. If an underlying distribution can be identified,
then clearly certain assumptions follow. For example, if a data set is normally distributed then we
know that in general we may calculate parameters such as the mean and variance by using certain
standard formulae. If a data set follows the Poisson distribution then we may assume that the
population mean and variance are numerically identical.
58 HELM (2015):
Workbook 50: Tutor’s Guide
®
The second section of the Workbook (“Contingency Tables”) is concerned with situations in which
members of samples drawn from a population can be classified by more than one method, for example
the failure of electronic components in a system installed in a machine and the positions in a machine
in which they are mounted. The Workbook discusses how such information may be presented and
follows this by a discussion involving hypothesis tests to decide (using the example outlined above)
whether or not there is sufficient evidence to conclude that failure of a component is related to
position in the machine.
Modern computer software makes the calculations for multiple regressions and many nonlinear re-
gressions readily available but an understanding of the basic ideas, gained through looking at simple
cases, is essential to interpret the results.
The main technique used to study linear regression is the method of least squares. In order that
this topic be fully understood, it is necessary to use some multi-variable calculus. The Workbook
deliberately ignores this and simply presents the equations resulting from the use of this technique.
Section 43.2 is concerned with the topic of correlation. Two common methods of measuring the
degree of a possible relationship between two random variables are considered, these are Pearson’s r
and Spearman’s R. The methods of calculation given will result in a numerical value being obtained.
The strength of evidence for the existence of a relationship may be measured by performing a
significance test. The importance of the normality assumption for the usual test of Pearson’s r
should be emphasised. In cases where this assumption cannot be made or where a relationship may
be monotonic but not linear Spearman’s R should be used. It is worth noting that significance tests
involving both measures of correlation involve the use of Student’s t-distribution and that it may be
worth revising this topic before a study of correlation is attempted.
The Workbook starts with one-way ANOVA and the introduction makes clear the advantages accruing
from a technique enabling us to simultaneously compare several means. On reading the introduction,
HELM (2015): 59
Section 50.8: Commentaries on Workbooks 1 to 48
it should be clear to the student that not only is the amount of work needed to compare several
means drastically reduced but also that use of ANOVA gives the required significance level whereas
use of a collection of pairwise tests would distort the significance level. When working through the
learning material, students should ensure that they clearly understand the difference between the
phrases “variance between sample” and “variance within samples”.
While one-way ANOVA considers the effect of only one factor on the values taken by a variable,
two-way ANOVA considers the simultaneous effect of two or more factors on a variable. Two distinct
cases are considered, firstly when possible interaction between the factors themselves is ignored
and secondly when such interaction is taken into account. The Workbook concludes with a short
introduction to experimental design. This section is included to encourage students to consider the
design of any engineering based experimental work that they may be required to undertake and to
appreciate that the application of statistical methods to engineering begins with the design of an
experiment and not with the analysis of the data arising from the experiment.
A common error is to suppose that there are such things as “parametric data” and “non-parametric
data”. It is not the data, which are “parametric” or “non-parametric”, of course, but the procedures,
which are applied, and the assumptions underlying them. It is hoped that this Workbook will convey
an understanding of the different assumptions which are made, just what it is that is being tested
and when it is appropriate to use a nonparametric test. The tests which are specifically addressed,
the sign test, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test (which is equivalent to
the Mann-Whitney U -test) are straightforward in themselves but the assumptions underlying them
and their interpretation are not always well grasped.
60 HELM (2015):
Workbook 50: Tutor’s Guide
®
series will be as reliable as the least reliable member, this turns out not to be the case - the set turns
out to be less reliable than its least reliable member!
The section concerning quality control starts with a very brief history of the subject and introduces
the student to some essential elementary control techniques including simple quality control charts,
R-charts and Pareto charts. Elementary trend detection is considered via the use of “standard”
checks, which the student may apply to, given data sets.
The material in this Workbook will have a clear relevance for many engineering students. Tutors
might like to consider using some of the material earlier in the sequence of Workbooks if this seems
appropriate to maintain interest and motivation.
[See the references at the end of this Section in the Workbook, which includes suggested Google
search keywords.]
Section 47.3 “Physics Case Studies” has eleven items. Many engineering problems are based upon
fundamental physics and require mathematical modelling for their solution. This Section contains
a compendium of case studies involving physics (or related topics) as an additional teaching and
learning resource beyond those included in the previous HELM Workbooks.
Each case study will involve several mathematical topics; the relevant HELM Workbooks are stated
at the beginning of each case study.
HELM (2015): 61
Section 50.8: Commentaries on Workbooks 1 to 48
Table 1: Physics topics, related Mathematical topics and Workbooks
Time allocation
To work through the whole Workbook will require at least twenty hours of independent study. However
it would be more normal (and preferable) to use it to ‘dip-in-and-out’, and to follow up additional
examples of modelling using particular techniques for an hour or two at a time.
Format
The eleven Physics Case Studies in Workbook 47 have a common format (with rare minor variations),
This is the same as that used for the Engineering Examples in Workbooks 1 to 34. The section
headings are:
Introduction
This consists of a paragraph or two of background information, setting the context and stating
essential engineering information, definitions and fundamental concepts.
62 HELM (2015):
Workbook 50: Tutor’s Guide
®
Problem in words
This consists of a statement of the problem in words including the purpose of the model.
Mathematical analysis
This part gives the solution to the problem or explains how it can be solved using techniques in the
indicated Workbooks.
Interpretation
This interprets the mathematical result in engineering terms and includes at least a statement of the
result in words. If appropriate, there are comments about whether results make sense, mathematical
points, indications of further extensions or applications and implications.
Table 2 below summarises the engineering contexts, the mathematical topics and the relevant HELM
mathematics Workbooks for these Case Studies. It should be possible to use this Workbook to
reinforce notions of modelling using a wide cross section of mathematical techniques. The more
elementary mathematical topics and relevant Workbooks are not usually mentioned - for example
basic functions (Workbook 2) pervades every case Study and so is omitted. However, where there is
significant algebraic manipulation (Workbook 1) or equation rearrangement (Workbook 3) this has
been reflected in the table.
The Case Studies have been grouped together by broad engineering topic and not by mathematical
topic or difficulty or length. (The shortest and most straightforward is 11.)
HELM (2015): 63
Section 50.8: Commentaries on Workbooks 1 to 48
Table 2: Engineering topics, related Mathematical topics and Workbooks
64 HELM (2015):
Workbook 50: Tutor’s Guide
®
Time allocation
To work through the whole Workbook will require at least fifty hours of independent study. However
it would be more normal (and preferable) to use it to ‘dip-in-and-out’, and to follow up additional
examples of modelling using particular techniques for an hour or two at a time.
Format
The twenty Engineering Case Studies in Workbook 48 have a common format (with rare minor
variations). This is the same as that used for the Engineering Examples in Workbooks 1 to 34. The
section headings are:
Introduction
This consists of a paragraph or two of background information, setting the context and stating
essential engineering information, definitions and fundamental concepts.
Problem in words
This consists of a statement of the problem in words including the purpose of the model.
Interpretation
This interprets the mathematical result in engineering terms and includes at least a statement of the
result in words. If appropriate, there are comments about whether results make sense, mathematical
points, indications of further extensions or applications and implications.
Where possible there are comments on the sensitivity of the analysis to input data and the necessary
numerical accuracy of the outputs.
HELM (2015): 65
Section 50.8: Commentaries on Workbooks 1 to 48
Index of Engineering
Contexts in
Workbooks 1 to 48 50.9
66 HELM (2015):
Workbook 50: Tutor’s Guide
®
HELM (2015): 67
Section 50.9: Index of Engineering Contexts in Workbooks 1 to 48
Current Wbk 11 21
Current associated with magnetic field Wbk 28 28
Current in line Wbk 29 26, 67
Current in loop Wbk 29 27
Currents in a ladder network Wbk 21 60
Currents in three loops Wbk 8 30
Currents in two loops Wbk 8 16
Cutting steel quality Wbk 45 9
Dam Wbk 27 3, 15, 36
Defective components Wbk 35 48
Defects (in components and products) Wbk 37 8, 19, 20, 23, 24,
40, 42, 54-58
Deflection of a beam Wbk 48 20
Deflection of a uniformly loaded beam Wbk 19 67
Deflection of a uniformly loaded beam Wbk 20 52
Demodulation Wbk 4 40
Detecting a train on a track Wbk 30 62
Diffraction Wbk 4 6
Diffusion equation Wbk 25 8, 14
Dimensional analysis Wbk 47 2-23
Diode Wbk 31 20
Divergence of a magnetic field Wbk 28 43
Drag Wbk 34 56
Drag Wbk 47 15, 23
Dynamometer Wbk 14 16
68 HELM (2015):
Workbook 50: Tutor’s Guide
®
Gain Wbk 10 26
Gauss’ law Wbk 29 63, 65
HELM (2015): 69
Section 50.9: Index of Engineering Contexts in Workbooks 1 to 48
Heat conduction equation Wbk 25 8, 14
Heat conduction equation Wbk 32 48
Heat conduction through a furnace wall Wbk 25 32
Heat flow in an insulated metal plate Wbk 1 85
Height of building Wbk 18 34
Helmholtz’s equation Wbk 25 18
High frequency line equation Wbk 25 16
Hooke’s law Wbk 43 21
Hooke’s law Wbk 47 6
Horizon distance Wbk 4 8
Hydraulic brakes Wbk 12 31
Hypertension and noise Wbk 43 8
Ideal gas equation Wbk 47 18
Ideal gas law Wbk 18 13, 18
Ideal gas law and Redlich-Kwong equation Wbk 18 18
Impedance Wbk 12 60-63
Instant coffee production Wbk 46 30, 32, 35
Insulating blocks Wbk 45 4, 14, 29
Interference field Wbk 47 51
Interference fringes Wbk 47 64
Interference fringes Wbk 4 31
Inverse square law decay of electromagnetic power Wbk 6 50
70 HELM (2015):
Workbook 50: Tutor’s Guide
®
Network Wbk 1 52
Network Wbk 7 4, 25-28
Newton’s law of cooling Wbk 32 3
Newton’s laws of motion Wbk 47 13
Newton’s second law Wbk 9 13
Newton’s second law Wbk 15 3
Newton’s second law Wbk 28 6
Newton’s second law Wbk 34 60
Noise Wbk 43 8
Noise barriers Wbk 4 6
Noise reduction by sound barriers Wbk 4 6
HELM (2015): 71
Section 50.9: Index of Engineering Contexts in Workbooks 1 to 48
Ohm’s law Wbk 3 25
Ohm’s law Wbk 29 47
Optical interference fringes due to glass plate Wbk 4 31
Orbit Wbk 17 22
Orifice plate flow meter Wbk 47 20
Output signal Wbk 20 64
72 HELM (2015):
Workbook 50: Tutor’s Guide
®
HELM (2015): 73
Section 50.9: Index of Engineering Contexts in Workbooks 1 to 48
Sound waves Wbk 4 6
Spot welds Wbk 43 18
Spring Wbk 43 21
Spring Wbk 47 6
Spring - damped Wbk 20 39
Springs Wbk 20 47
Steel alloy corrosion Wbk 44 21
Steel bar Wkb 13 19
Steel cables Wbk 41 25, 29, 37
Stiffness Wbk 13 18
Strain Wbk 8 10
Strain Wbk 13 19
Strain gauge resistance Wbk 39 18-20
Streamlines Wbk 26 14
Stress Wbk 8 10
Stress Wbk 13 19
Stresses and strains on a section of material Wbk 8 10
String Wbk 47 5, 7
Submarine equation Wbk 25 16
Surface tension Wbk 47 14, 17
Suspended cable Wbk 15 21
Suspended cable Wbk 48 40
Switches Wbk 41 10
System reliability Wbk 46 7-9
System response Wbk 20 71
74 HELM (2015):
Workbook 50: Tutor’s Guide
®
Torsion Wbk 13 19
Torsion Wbk 17 13
Torsion of mild-steel bar Wbk 13 19
Total energy Wbk 34 28
Traffic flow Wbk 37 11, 46
Train on a track Wbk 30 62
Transmission line equation Wbk 25 16
Transverse vibrations equation Wbk 25 18
Turbochargers Wbk 41 17
Turbulence Wbk 47 16
Two dimensional fluid flow Wbk 26 36
Tyre mileage Wbk 38 13
HELM (2015): 75
Section 50.9: Index of Engineering Contexts in Workbooks 1 to 48
NOTES