Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 49 views

    MT Recla Evaluation

    Uploaded by

    Karen May Urlanda
    This document contains an evaluation sheet for ranking Master Teachers. It lists basic requirements like recommendation letters, classroom programs, and performance ratings that must be met. It then lists criteria in two categories: 1) qualifications and 2) leadership potential and accomplishments. The criteria include things like introducing new teaching materials, serving as a subject coordinator, conducting educational research, and authoring publications. Candidates are ranked based on points earned across the various criteria categories. The top section is for inputting candidates' information and points earned. The bottom section is for the evaluation committee to sign off on the rankings.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    MT Recla Evaluation

    Uploaded by

    Karen May Urlanda
    49 views3 pages
    This document contains an evaluation sheet for ranking Master Teachers. It lists basic requirements like recommendation letters, classroom programs, and performance ratings that must be met. It then lists criteria in two categories: 1) qualifications and 2) leadership potential and accomplishments. The criteria include things like introducing new teaching materials, serving as a subject coordinator, conducting educational research, and authoring publications. Candidates are ranked based on points earned across the various criteria categories. The top section is for inputting candidates' information and points earned. The bottom section is for the evaluation committee to sign off on the rankings.

    Original Title

    MT-RECLA-EVALUATION

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document contains an evaluation sheet for ranking Master Teachers. It lists basic requirements like recommendation letters, classroom programs, and performance ratings that must be met. It then lists criteria in two categories: 1) qualifications and 2) leadership potential and accomplishments. The criteria include things like introducing new teaching materials, serving as a subject coordinator, conducting educational research, and authoring publications. Candidates are ranked based on points earned across the various criteria categories. The top section is for inputting candidates' information and points earned. The bottom section is for the evaluation committee to sign off on the rankings.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    49 views3 pages

    MT Recla Evaluation

    Uploaded by

    Karen May Urlanda
    This document contains an evaluation sheet for ranking Master Teachers. It lists basic requirements like recommendation letters, classroom programs, and performance ratings that must be met. It then lists criteria in two categories: 1) qualifications and 2) leadership potential and accomplishments. The criteria include things like introducing new teaching materials, serving as a subject coordinator, conducting educational research, and authoring publications. Candidates are ranked based on points earned across the various criteria categories. The top section is for inputting candidates' information and points earned. The bottom section is for the evaluation committee to sign off on the rankings.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 3

    Department of Education

    Region XII
    DIVISION OF SULTAN KUDARAT
    Tacurong City

    EVALUATION SHEET FOR MASTER TEACHER

    Name of Teacher Division School

    BASIC REQUIREMENTS: Please check if attended.

    __________ Superintendent's Recommendation


    __________ Latest Classroom program
    __________ Appointment/service record or other records showing educational qualification, status and length of service
    __________ Performance rating: Last two rating periods for Master Teacher I, and 1 rating period for Master Teacher II
    __________ District memorandum/letter of dissemination to the field, transcript of records and special order/certification
    on academic requirements for Master Teacher II

    CREDIT POINTS EARNED: 25-30-45-55-60 School DIVISION REGION

    __________ A. Demonstration Teaching


    B. Leadership Potential
    a. Curriculum material/Teaching Technique/
    simplified work/income generating project
    b. Subject coordinator/grade chairman/
    club adviser
    c. Special Committee chairman
    d. Educational research
    e. Purok coordinator/committee member
    f. In-service training/group chairman
    g. Trainor or coach/Coordinator scouting
    activities
    h. Authorship

    TOTAL

    A. SCHOOL/DISTRICT EVALUATION/SCREENING COMMITTEE

    Member Member Member

    School Principal
    B. DIVISION EVALUATION/SCREENING COMMITTEE

    LAZARO P. ORIEL ADORA S. VILLA ROMEL M. LOTILLA SHERYL L. OSANO NELLY S. BRAGADO
    AO-IV/ Secretary AO-IV/ Member SEPS-HRD/Member EPS/ Member EPS/ Member

    MARY GRACE B. LEYSA MOHALIDIN M. SUAEB, Ph.D. ISMAEL M. AMBALGAN


    P-IV/ Member Chief-SGOD/ Member Co-Chairman Schools Division Superintendent
    APPROVED: (CHAIRMAN)

    Schools Division Superintendent

    C. REGIONAL EVALUATION/SCREENING COMMITTEE

    JOVEL S. HUNAS
    Teacher Credential Evaluator REPS REPS
    Approved:

    Regional Director
    (Enclosure to Region Memorandum No. 28, s. 1979)
    EVALUATION SHEET FOR RANKING OF MASTER TEACHER
    Division:
    District:
    Position Ranked:

    CRITERIA NAME OF CANDIDATES


    1. Qualifications
    A.) C.S. Eligibility
    B.) Highest Educational Qualification
    C.) Performance Rating for last three years
    D.) Number of years in Teaching Experience (at least 3years)
    E.) Regular Teaching loads (Number of Minutes)
    II - Leadership, Potential and Accomplishments
    1. Introduced any of thefollowing which has been adopted or
    used by the district or Division (20pts)
    1.1 Cur. Or Inst. Materials
    1.2 Effective Teaching techniques or strategies
    1.3 Simplification of work resulting in cost reduction
    1.4 Worthwhile income generating project with students
    given recognition by the division
    __________
    2. Served as subject as coordinator or grade chairman for at
    least one year or as school paper adviser of school publication
    or any special organization and discharged such assigment or
    service or in addition to, and not considered part of the
    regular teaching load (12pts.)
    __________
    3. Served as Chairman of the special committee such as curriculum
    study committee to prepare instructional material and to
    prepare school teaching program, discharged the work efficiency
    atleast 1 year (12pts.)
    __________
    4. Initiated or healed an educational research activity duly approved
    by educational authorities, either for improvement of instruction,
    for community development or teacher welfare. (12pts.)
    For participation as member of activity (7pts.)
    5. Coordinator of community project or activity or of program of
    another agency or coordinator of a rural service improvement
    activity in a community such as feeding, nutrition, agro-industrial
    fairs, etc. for atleast 2 years (12 pts.). For participation as member
    of such activity (7 pts.)
    6. Initiated/organized/managed an in-service activity or other similar
    activities on the school level (12 pts.)
    Facilitator and discussant alone are not considered.
    7. Credited with meritorious achievements such as:
    7.1 Trainor or coach to contestant who receive prizes,
    commendations or any form of recognition:
    National Winner = 10 points
    Regional Winner = 5 points
    Provincial Winner = 3 points
    District Winner = 1 point
    7.2 Athletic coach of athletes or teams,
    who won prizes as follows:
    National Winner = 10 points
    Regional Winner = 5 points
    Provincial Winner = 3 points
    District Winner = 1 point
    7.3 Coordinator/manager of Boy or Girl Sccout
    activities:
    National Winner = 10 points
    Regional Winner = 5 points
    Provincial Winner = 3 points
    District Winner = 1 point
    8. Authorshop (Published) 10 points for a book and 1 point for
    each article provided they are on education:
    Sole Authorship = 10 points
    Co-authorship = 5 points
    Article = 1 point
    9. Demonstration Teacher (10 points)

    TOTAL POINTS
    RANK

    _______________________________________
    Chairman

    ____________________________________ ___________________________________
    Member Member

    ____________________________________
    Member

    You might also like