2021 An Update On Eating Disorders
2021 An Update On Eating Disorders
2021 An Update On Eating Disorders
24
all psychiatric disorders (Franko 2013). Behavioural Jane Morris, MA, MB BChir
SUMMARY (Cantab), FRCPsych, is a consultant
and psychotherapeutic approaches are the mainstays
Eating disorders are heterogeneous disorders of treatment.
psychiatrist at the Royal Cornhill
characterised by a maladaptive drive to lose Hospital, Aberdeen, UK, and lead
This review summarises the current state of the clinician for the North of Scotland
weight and, for the most part, by extreme fear of
specialty, covering eating disorders characterised Managed Clinical Network in Eating
weight gain and overvaluation of thin body Disorders. Stephen Anderson, BSc
image. Calorie restriction, overexercise and pur- by preoccupation with weight, shape and calorie
(Hons), MB ChB, FRCPsych, is a con-
ging behaviours put some sufferers at high risk of balance. Disordered eating behaviour stemming sultant psychiatrist in eating disor-
physical morbidity and mortality. Mental preoccu- from autistic, affective or other underpinnings war- ders in the Eating Disorder Service,
pations interfere with social, professional and gen- rants a separate review. NHS Forth Valley, Stirling, UK, and
eral quality of life. Patients’ defensive secrecy and Chair of the Royal College of
Psychiatrists in Scotland’s Faculty of
compulsivity can make it hard to diagnose and
Contemporary models of eating disorders Eating Disorders.
treat such disorders despite the suffering they Correspondence Stephen Anderson.
involve. Integrated medical and psychiatric inter- Clinicians commonly hold an ‘illness model’ of Email: stephenanderson@nhs.net
vention can save life and safely improve nutrition. eating disorders, whereas lay people, journalists
Behavioural support – with family and carer and patients, particularly on social media, may First received 13 Jan 2020
involvement when appropriate – can counter the assume that eating disorders represent a lifestyle
Final revision 22 Mar 2020
Accepted 31 Mar 2020
dysregulation that leads to vicious cycles of
choice. Charland and colleagues proposed that anor-
restriction–binge–purge, helping patients develop
exia nervosa be considered a ‘passion’ – an overrid- Copyright and usage
new skills to regulate emotion without weight losing. © The Authors 2020
In the future, exciting developments in neuroima- ing affect-laden philosophical priority (Charland
ging, neurosurgery and pharmacology may lead to 2013). This notion is fruitful in suggesting that treat-
ways to make the brain more responsive to therapy. ment should ‘fight passion with passion’.
Insights into risk factors may also improve prevent- Others emphasise endemic ‘eating-disordered’
ive strategies in a climate of highly sophisticated symptoms in society, stressing the role of physio-
international electronic communication. logical dysregulation in perpetuating restriction–
binge–purge cycles. Proponents of family-based
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
treatment (FBT) (Lock 2015) observe that early
After reading this article you will be able to: refeeding alone treats many teenagers with anorexia
• identify and assess the different types of eating
nervosa. Such diverse opinion suggests heterogen-
disorder, and be aware of core clinical signs
eity despite many common features. Clinicians who
and symptoms
• confidently manage the physical and psycho- address only physical disruptions are unlikely to
logical consequences of eating disorders in engage their patients or provide alternative coping
accordance with current evidence-based strategies, whereas those who neglect physiological
guidelines maintaining factors may inadvertently perpetuate
• understand current controversies in the field chronicity.
and evolving research themes.
9
https://doi.org/10.1192/bja.2020.24 Published online by Cambridge University Press
Morris & Anderson
Restrictive Often extreme calorie restriction, As for anorexia nervosa, but less Sufferer is less able to practise
behaviours with many dietary ‘rules’, extreme than in the restrictive extreme food restriction
including adoption of restrictive form of anorexia nervosa
diets – extreme forms of
veganism or ‘clean eating’ are
common
Binges In the binge–purge subtype, binges The hallmark of bulimia nervosa is Binges are similar in quality to
occur. ‘Subjective binges’ the large-scale, out-of-control bulimia nervosa but usually
describe unintended eating that consumption of amounts of food less extreme in amount. The
is distressingly out of control definitely more than would be lack of control over such
though not objectively a large normally consumed in a single eating is experienced with
amount sitting, and often food of a type shame and distress
not usually served as a meal
(e.g. entire packets of biscuits,
tubs of ice cream)
Compensatory Binge–purge subtype of anorexia Binges are followed by such Such behaviours are less
behaviours nervosa involves purging by compensatory behaviours as prominent in binge eating
vomiting or laxatives. Restrictive self-induced vomiting, disorder
subtype does not always, but deliberate regurgitation or use
may, change to binge–purge of laxatives or diuretics.
subtype in time. Deliberate Deliberate overexercise to burn
overexercise to burn off calories off calories also occurs
is often a feature of restrictive
anorexia nervosa
Affect and feeling There is often pride in successful Extremely high levels of shame are Shame, depression and low self-
weight loss, with increasing common, usually focused on esteem are common
levels of shame, anxiety and low bodily shame
mood as the disorder persists.
Isolation and social avoidance
contribute to this
Body-checking and Many patients repeatedly check their Patients may engage in similar body- Patients, particularly those who
body image body weight and composition by checking behaviours to those in are overweight, are most
avoidance weighing, measuring, pinching anorexia nervosa, but many also likely to practise body image
their flesh, trying on garments to practise body image avoidance avoidance to avoid the
assess size, inspecting their and hide their bodies in public – distress and shame of
appearance in mirrors or ‘selfie’ being unable to wear exposure
photographs, and making swimwear, sportswear or other
comments about their weight tightly fitting clothes. They may
that are designed to elicit avoid being weighed out of
reassurance shame and distress
Communication Preoccupation with losing weight is As in anorexia nervosa, Body shame and low self-esteem
extreme and interferes with preoccupation with losing may lead sufferers to
other aspects of life. Web-based weight may be extreme, engage in unrewarding,
and social media activity is although social life and work are unduly deferential
focused on losing weight often maintained. Web-based relationships
and social media activity is
focused on losing weight
psychopathology of preoccupation with weight and prevalence of anorexia nervosa in the general popu-
shape. lation in Western countries is about 1% among
Psychiatric classifications are limited by reliance on women and 0.5% among men. Gender distribution
symptoms, whereas research is hampered by inaccurate is less skewed in children. Adolescents have higher
diagnostic groupings. Treatment evidence is inextric- rates of full recovery and lower mortality than
ably tied to existing categorisation. Clinicians should adults (mean mortality 2 v. 5%).
remember that a patient’s failure to precisely meet A recent Scandinavian register-based study (Reas
listed criteria does not automatically exclude an eating 2018) found that, for both genders aged 10–49
disorder. Moreover, patients’ diagnoses commonly years, incidence rates of anorexia nervosa were
migrate across categories during the course of illness. stable across the 7-year period to 2016, at 18.8–
20.4 per 100 000 for narrowly defined and 33.2–
Epidemiology 39.5 per 100 000 for broadly defined anorexia
Eating disorders typically begin in early to mid- nervosa. There was a significant annual increase in
adolescence, but can emerge at any age (Nicholls anorexia nervosa among 10- to 14-year-old girls.
2011; Steinhausen 2015; Micali 2017). Lifetime Overall rates of bulimia nervosa declined.
Register-based studies substantially underesti- In anorexia nervosa the observed rigid thinking,
mate true community prevalence, and it is reported poor central coherence and emotional avoidance
that half of those who meet diagnostic criteria in may improve, at least partially, with re-nutrition
the community do not access treatment. Not receiv- (refeeding), but may persist and may also be observed
ing treatment is even more likely in low- and middle- in unaffected relatives (Kanakam 2013; Lang 2014).
income countries, now seeing increased prevalence Different eating disorders show different abnor-
of formerly ‘Western’ disorders. malities of attentional bias. In bulimia nervosa and
binge eating disorder there is increased attentional
bias towards food-related cues, whereas individuals
Risk factors with anorexia nervosa have increased attentional
Genetics bias towards disliked aspects of body image
Early family studies, large twin-based studies and (Stojek 2018). This could guide specific interven-
smaller adoption studies demonstrate both a herit- tions for different disorders.
able component and significant influence of non-
shared environmental factors in eating disorders. Sociocultural factors
There is a strong familial component to anorexia A prospective study of healthy adolescent girls (Stice
nervosa, with estimates of heritability between 28 2017) found that impaired interpersonal functioning
and 74%. The genetic contribution is polygenic. and negative affect were transdiagnostic risk factors.
Large genome-wide association studies (GWAS) Pursuit of the thin ideal, body dissatisfaction,
highlight the need to consider psychiatric and meta- dieting and unhealthy weight-control behaviours
bolic mechanisms involved in anorexia nervosa increased risk for bingeing and purging disorders.
(Watson 2019). These studies, together with further Inherently lean girls, even if not pursuing the thin
research in the genetics of bulimia nervosa and ideal, were at risk for anorexia nervosa.
binge eating disorder, may help elucidate new avenues The increase in eating disorders in lower-income
of treatment. societies follows Western lifestyle aspirations, nutri-
Gene–environment interactions are complex. tional habits and internalisation of the thin ideal.
Recent work on gut microbiota has found reduced Sociocultural pressures appear more powerful in
gut microbial diversity in anorexia nervosa, signifi- triggering bulimia nervosa and binge eating disorder
cantly associated with depression, anxiety and than anorexia nervosa but may also trigger genetic-
eating disorder symptoms (Kleiman 2015). ally vulnerable individuals to try to lose weight.
Childhood deprivation and trauma are important
Structural and functional brain abnormalities risk factors for many mental disorders and appear to
be associated with increased risk of bulimia nervosa
Neuroimaging often disappoints in revealing struc-
and binge eating disorder, but not anorexia nervosa
tural and functional abnormalities (Frank 2018).
(Larsen 2017).
Studies in anorexia nervosa may reflect consequences
Anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa are more
of starvation rather than the psychiatric disorder. Re-
common among females than males (Hoek 2006)
scans at normal weight cannot assume that brain
and there are higher rates of disordered eating
nutrition is fully restored or that damage is reversible,
among sexual minorities, particularly transgender
although studies suggest that some brain tissue
people (Calzo 2017).
abnormalities recover with weight regain.
Social media use and competitiveness can maintain
Reward and satiety circuits in the orbitofrontal
and perhaps trigger eating disorders (Ferguson 2014;
cortex are important in both anorexia nervosa and
Mabe 2014). Treatment and prevention strategies
bulimia nervosa. Structural magnetic resonance
might benefit from identifying differences between
imaging has revealed that individuals with anorexia
helpful and harmful behaviour online and in social
nervosa had increased right insula grey matter
media.
compared with controls (Frank 2018). This area is
associated with self-recognition and interoceptive
awareness. Prospective studies may explore whether Prevention
these changes are biomarkers or sequelae. A large number of prevention programmes are under
Functional imaging, with symptom provocation, development and evaluation. The most promising
suggests abnormal responses in subcortical regions interventions use cognitive dissonance, cognitive–
associated with stimulus-driven responses, and in behavioural therapy (CBT) and media literacy.
prefrontal regions involved in evaluation and execu- Although prevention programmes generally improve
tive control (Kaye 2013). Abnormalities in reward participants’ knowledge, and sometimes reduce risk
circuit activation have also been found in anorexia factors, there is no evidence that they actually
nervosa (Monteleone 2018). reduce development of diagnosable eating disorders.
Ambivalence and the perception of coercion often secondary to the eating disorder – for instance, star-
fluctuate over the course of treatment. vation from any cause frequently causes depression.
Compulsory treatment may increase eating dis- Over 70% of people with anorexia nervosa report
order behaviours in an attempt to regain control. a lifetime mood disorder (Keski-Rahkonen 2016).
Clinicians may then impose yet more restriction, so Between 25 and 75% report a lifetime history of an
the vicious circle strengthens, unless this is anxiety disorder (Raney 2008), typically preceding
managed by working to engage the patient. Studies the anorexic illness. Bulimia nervosa is even more
have shown that compulsory treatment may robustly associated with affective and anxiety disor-
improve survival, even when detained patients had ders (Becker 2018). Around 80% of people with
poorer functioning before admission (Ward 2016). anorexia nervosa experience OCD symptoms at
Detention may retain people in treatment long some point. Prior OCD is associated with increased
enough to establish an effective therapeutic alliance risk of subsequent bulimia nervosa (Hofer 2018).
that will then be the basis for ongoing work towards Register-based studies confirm aggregation of
recovery. autism spectrum disorder in probands with anorexia
nervosa and their relatives (Koch 2015).
The prevalence of alcohol misuse in restrictive
Prognosis anorexia nervosa is similar to that in the general
The standardised mortality ratio for anorexia nervosa population. People with bulimic illnesses have a
is 5.9 – the highest mortality rate of all psychiatric dis- higher prevalence of substance misuse (Root
orders (Franko 2013). Most deaths result – shockingly 2010). Eating disorder sufferers use harmful sub-
– from starvation. Significant numbers are attributed stances to reduce appetite, trigger vomiting, burn
to suicide. With treatment, around 50% of people with off calories or permit overexercise despite pain.
anorexia nervosa recover fully (Murray 2019). Lower There is increased prevalence of other disorders of
body mass index (BMI) or higher age at admission, impulsivity and lack of control in people with
persistence of binge eating and purging behaviours, bulimia nervosa (Kim 2018; Sala 2018).
substance misuse and type 1 diabetes all predict
poor outcome. Motherhood is related to better
outcome, as is access to specialist eating disorder Insulin-dependent diabetes
services. Type 1 diabetes is a disease of insulin deficiency,
Recovery from bulimia nervosa is widely consid- resulting from destruction of pancreatic insulin-pro-
ered greater than from anorexia nervosa. At 9-year ducing cells. This causes hyperglycaemia, gluco-
follow-up, 68.2% of participants with bulimia suria, ketone production and weight loss. Diabetics
nervosa had recovered, compared with 31.4% of lose weight easily by omitting insulin rather than
those with anorexia nervosa; however, by 22-year by diet, overexercise and purging. Between 30 and
follow-up, 62.8% of participants with anorexia 40% of young people with diabetes omit or reduce
nervosa had recovered (the recovery rate for insulin with the intention of losing weight (Hasken
bulimia nervosa remained at 68.2%) (Eddy 2017). 2010). Longitudinal studies suggest an increase in
In contrast, despite optimistic long-term results eating disorders among young women with type 1
from centres of excellence (Franko 2018), other evi- diabetes (Larranaga 2011). The peak onset of type
dence suggests recovery rates from anorexia nervosa 1 diabetes is at age 10–14, unfortunately just as
decrease over time, particularly after 12 years puberty brings increased body image concerns.
(Papadopoulos 2009). The term ‘diabulimia’ (not recognised in official
There is disagreement about what constitutes diagnostic criteria) implies that causing calories to
‘recovery’ from eating disorders, with consequent be excreted in the form of glycosuria and high
variation in outcome figures. Qualitative meta-ana- blood glucose levels is analogous to purging. In
lysis finds that recovered individuals value self- type 1 diabetes conventional eating disorder beha-
acceptance, autonomy and interpersonal relation- viours are unlikely, so we recommend use of the
ships as much as reduced eating disorder symptoms Diabetes Eating Problem Survey – Revised
(de Vos 2017). (DEPS-R) screening tool (Markowitz 2010).
In addition to the serious but mostly reversible
Comorbidity complications of non-diabetic eating disorders, dia-
betic complications are cumulative and irreversible.
Psychiatric disorders They include retinopathy, kidney disease and per-
Behavioural symptoms of eating disorders often ipheral neuropathy. Insulin reduction increases
overlap with those of other psychiatric conditions, muscle breakdown, risk of dehydration, fatigue
although the meaning of such behaviours may be and risk of infection. The presence of an eating dis-
different. Some apparent comorbidity may be order significantly and greatly increases rates of
ketoacidosis, hospital admissions, morbidity and some women become pregnant without having
mortality and there is an association between periods, so contraception is still relevant.
poorer glycaemic control and self-reported eating Body changes during pregnancy have various
disorder symptoms. effects. Some women ‘suspend’ their eating disorder,
There is a potential for preventive approaches in attributing the need for nutrition to a cherished
diabetes clinics. Clinicians need awareness of baby, but others report increased body image con-
eating disorder patients’ acute sensitivity to weight cerns and fear that weight will get out of control
and body image, and psychological ‘denial’ of the (Rocco 2005).
risks of diabetic complications. Such patients avoid A mother’s eating disorder can significantly affect
giving insulin, avoid monitoring their blood fetal development, especially neural development.
glucose to prevent being confronted with ‘bad’ Women with anorexia nervosa are more likely to
results and avoid clinic appointments for fear of have smaller-than-average babies and increased
being ‘told off’. risk of postnatal depression. Women with active
bulimia nervosa have increased risk of miscarriage
(Micali 2017).
Personality disorders
Around 30% of patients with an eating disorder meet
criteria for at least one personality disorder (Solmi Severe and enduring anorexia nervosa
2018). Many meet criteria for more than one. Definitions of ‘severe and enduring anorexia
Some features are common to both disorders, and nervosa’ (SE-AN) vary. The very concept is conten-
it is possible that some are consequences of the tious. ‘SE-AN’ is evoked when the eating disorder
eating disorder or its treatment, rather than does not appear to respond to our best available
primary features of a personality disorder. treatments or responds only with extreme distress.
The presence of a comorbid personality disorder A rehabilitation model, shifting away from weight
causes difficulties in terms of diagnosis and manage- recovery to focus on quality of life, may be more
ment. There are likely to be additional problems in appropriate, reducing adverse effects, achieving
engaging such patients, and increased risk of some symptom control and setting attainable goals
suicide and other mortality. The eating disorder (Bamford 2015).
may be used to manage the symptoms of the person- Recent studies suggest that CBT-ED is effective
ality disorder, or the personality disorder may predis- for people with long-standing anorexia nervosa in
pose to eating disorder behaviours. Individualised community or in-patient treatment (Raykos 2018),
formulation helps both patient and clinicians to but clinicians as well as patients may experience
understand these functions. Alternative emotional hopelessness. If this is not managed in supervision,
coping behaviours can help patients to give up less ‘therapeutic nihilism’ can blight patients’ chances.
adaptive behaviours. Patients may be considered ‘treatment resistant’
Treatment access is complicated by service when not all appropriate treatment approaches
boundaries. NICE recommends that people with have been attempted. A detailed independent
eating disorders are managed by specialists second opinion can suggest other avenues to follow.
(National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
2017). People with personality disorders tend to
be managed by community mental health services Emerging treatments
and may be referred between services according to Current research activity is most active in exploring
dominant symptoms, receiving inadequate treat- ever more powerful, more focused or novel psycho-
ment in each when the disorders are intertwined. logical therapies such as cognitive remediation
Eating disorder treatment focused on reducing therapy and exposure-based therapy, and third-
purging may lead to an increase in trauma-related wave behavioural therapies such as radically open
symptoms if purging was a way to cope with flash- dialectical behaviour therapy. There is also research
backs. Difficulty managing relationships with differ- into improved delivery of treatments in a range of
ent clinicians is a notorious aspect of personality web-based or electronic formats, both to exploit
disorder presentation, so joint working is essential. media that may be most acceptable to patients and
also to provide equitable delivery of care from
small specialist services across remote or low-
Fertility, pregnancy and the puerperium income populations.
The effects of starvation on the hypothalamic– One bold, and often controversial, approach to
pituitary–gonadal axis often cause amenorrhoea. both the understanding and treatment of eating dis-
Women attending infertility clinics have a high orders is the practice of neurosurgery and deep brain
prevalence of lifetime eating disorder. Conversely stimulation.
Becker KR, Fischer S, Crosby RD, et al (2018) Dimensional analysis of Kleiman SC, Watson HJ, Bulik-Sullivan EC, et al (2015) The intestinal
emotion trajectories before and after disordered eating behaviors in a microbiota in acute anorexia nervosa and during renourishment: relation-
sample of women with bulimia nervosa. Psychiatry Research, 268: ship to depression, anxiety, and eating disorder psychopathology.
490–500. Psychosomatic Medicine, 77: 969–81.
Bohn K, Doll HA, Cooper Z, et al (2008) The measurement of impairment Koch SV, Larsen JT, Mouridsen SE, et al (2015) Autism spectrum disorder
due to eating disorder psychopathology. Behaviour Research and Therapy, in individuals with anorexia nervosa and in their first- and second-degree
46: 1105–10. relatives: Danish nationwide register-based cohort-study. British Journal
of Psychiatry, 206: 401–7.
Brockmeyer T, Friederich HC, Schmidt U (2018) Advances in the treatment
of anorexia nervosa: a review of established and emerging interventions. Lang K, Lopez C, Stahl D, et al (2014) Central coherence in eating disor-
Psychological Medicine, 48: 1228–56. ders: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. World Journal of
Biological Psychiatry, 15: 586–98.
Bulik CM, Baucom DH, Kirby JS, et al (2011) Uniting Couples (in the treat-
ment of) Anorexia Nervosa (UCAN). International Journal of Eating Larranaga A, Docet MF, Garcia-Mayor RV (2011) Disordered eating
Disorders, 44: 19–28. behaviors in type 1 diabetic patients. World Journal of Diabetes, 2:
189–95.
Calzo JP, Blashill AJ, Brown TA, et al (2017) Eating disorders and disor-
dered weight and shape control behaviors in sexual minority populations. Larsen JT, Munk-Olsen T, Bulik CM, et al (2017) Early childhood adversi-
Current Psychiatry Reports, 19(8): 49. ties and risk of eating disorders in women: a Danish register-based cohort
study. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 50: 1404–12.
Charland LC, Hope T, Stewart A, et al (2013) Anorexia nervosa as a pas-
sion. Philosophy, Psychiatry & Psychology, 20: 353–65. Lock J, Le Grange D (2015) Treatment Manual for Anorexia Nervosa: A
Family-Based Approach (2nd edn). Guilford Press.
Crockett P, Morris J, Winston AP (2017) Managing Transitions When the
Patient Has an Eating Disorder: Guidance for Good Practice (College Mabe AG, Forney KJ, Keel PK (2014) Do you ‘like’ my photo? Facebook use
Report CR208). Royal College of Psychiatrists. maintains eating disorder risk. International Journal of Eating Disorders,
47: 516–23.
de Vos JA, Lamarre A, Radstaak M, et al (2017) Identifying fundamental
criteria for eating disorder recovery: a systematic review and qualitative Markowitz JT, Butler DA, Volkening LK, et al (2010) Brief screening tool
meta-analysis. Journal of Eating Disorders, 5: 34. for disordered eating in diabetes: internal consistency and external valid-
ity in a contemporary sample of pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes.
Eddy KT, Tabri N, Thomas JJ, et al (2017) Recovery from anorexia nervosa
Diabetes Care, 33: 495–500.
and bulimia nervosa at 22-year follow-up. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry,
78: 184–9. Micali N, Martini MG, Thomas JJ, et al (2017) Lifetime and 12-month
prevalence of eating disorders amongst women in mid-life: a popula-
Fairburn CG, Beglin SJ (1994) Assessment of eating disorders: interview
tion-based study of diagnoses and risk factors. BMC Medicine, 15(1): 12.
or self-report questionnaire? International Journal of Eating Disorders, 16:
363–70. Monteleone AM, Castellini G, Volpe U, et al (2018) Neuroendocrinology
and brain imaging of reward in eating disorders: a possible key to the
Ferguson CJ, Munoz ME, Garza A, et al (2014) Concurrent and prospective
treatment of anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. Progress in Neuro-
analyses of peer, television and social media influences on body dissat-
Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry, 80: 132–42.
isfaction, eating disorder symptoms and life satisfaction in adolescent
girls. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43: 1–14. Murray SB, Quintana DS, Loeb KL, et al (2019) Treatment outcomes for
anorexia nervosa: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized
Frank GKW, Favaro A, Marsh R, et al (2018) Toward valid and reliable
controlled trials. Psychological Medicine, 49: 535–544.
brain imaging results in eating disorders. International Journal of
Eating Disorders, 51: 250–61. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2017) Eating Disorders:
Recognition and Treatment (NICE Guideline NG69). NICE.
Franko DL, Keshaviah A, Eddy KT, et al (2013) A longitudinal investigation
of mortality in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. American Journal of Nicholls DE, Lynn R, Viner RM (2011) Childhood eating disorders:
Psychiatry, 170: 917–25. British national surveillance study. British Journal of Psychiatry, 198:
295–301.
Franko DL, Tabri N, Keshaviah A, et al (2018) Predictors of long-term
recovery in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa: data from a 22-year Papadopoulos FC, Ekbom A, Brandt L, et al (2009) Excess mortality, causes
longitudinal study. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 96: 183–8. of death and prognostic factors in anorexia nervosa. British Journal of
Psychiatry, 194: 10–7.
Fukutomi A, Austin A, Mcclelland J, et al (2020) First episode rapid early
intervention for eating disorders: a two-year follow-up. Early Intervention Peat CM, Berkman ND, Lohr KN, et al (2017) Comparative effectiveness of
in Psychiatry, 14: 137–41. treatments for binge-eating disorder: systematic review and network
meta-analysis. European Eating Disorders Review, 25: 317–28.
Hasken J, Kresl L, Nydegger T, et al (2010) Diabulimia and the role of
school health personnel. Journal of School Health, 80: 465–9. Raney TJ, Thornton LM, Berrettini W, et al (2008) Influence of overanxious
disorder of childhood on the expression of anorexia nervosa. International
Hoek HW (2006) Incidence, prevalence and mortality of anorexia nervosa
Journal of Eating Disorders, 41: 326–32.
and other eating disorders. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 19: 389–94.
Raykos BC, Erceg-Hurn DM, Mcevoy PM, et al (2018) Severe and enduring
Hofer PD, Wahl K, Meyer AH, et al (2018) Obsessive-compulsive disorder
anorexia nervosa? Illness severity and duration are unrelated to outcomes
and the risk of subsequent mental disorders: a community study of ado-
from cognitive behaviour therapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical
lescents and young adults. Depression and Anxiety, 35: 339–45.
Psychology, 86: 702–9.
Kanakam N, Treasure J (2013) A review of cognitive neuropsychiatry in
Reas DL, Ro O (2018) Time trends in healthcare-detected incidence of anor-
the taxonomy of eating disorders: state, trait, or genetic? Cognitive
exia nervosa and bulimia nervosa in the Norwegian National Patient Register
Neuropsychiatry, 18: 83–114.
(2010–2016). International Journal of Eating Disorders, 51: 1144–52.
Kaye WH, Wierenga CE, Bailer UF, et al (2013) Nothing tastes as good as
Rocco PL, Orbitello B, Perini L, et al (2005) Effects of pregnancy on eating
skinny feels: the neurobiology of anorexia nervosa. Trends in
attitudes and disorders: a prospective study. Journal of Psychosomatic
Neurosciences, 36: 110–20.
Research, 59: 175–9.
Keski-Rahkonen A, Mustelin L (2016) Epidemiology of eating disorders in
Root TL, Pinheiro AP, Thornton L, et al (2010) Substance use disorders in
Europe: prevalence, incidence, comorbidity, course, consequences, and
women with anorexia nervosa. International Journal of Eating Disorders,
risk factors. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 29: 340–5.
43: 14–21.
Kim HS, Von Ranson KM, Hodgins DC, et al (2018) Demographic, psychi-
Royal College of Psychiatrists (2012) Junior MARSIPAN: Management of
atric, and personality correlates of adults seeking treatment for disordered
Really Sick Patients under 18 with Anorexia Nervosa (College Report
gambling with a comorbid binge/purge type eating disorder. European
CR168). Royal College of Psychiatrists.
Eating Disorders Review, 26: 508–18.
Royal Colleges of Psychiatrists, Royal Colleges of Physicians, Royal Stojek M, Shank LM, Vannucci A, et al (2018) A systematic review of atten-
Colleges of Pathologists (2014) MARSIPAN: Management of Really Sick tional biases in disorders involving binge eating. Appetite, 123: 367–89.
Patients with Anorexia Nervosa (2nd edn) (College Report CR189).
Vocks S, Tuschen-Caffier B, Pietrowsky R, et al (2010) Meta-analysis of the
Royal College of Psychiatrists.
effectiveness of psychological and pharmacological treatments for binge
Sala L, Martinotti G, Carenti ML, et al (2018) Attention-deficit/hyperactiv- eating disorder. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 43: 205–17.
ity disorder symptoms and psychological comorbidity in eating disorder
Wade TD, Treasure J, Schmidt U, et al (2017) Comparative efficacy of
patients. Eating and Weight Disorders, 23: 513–9.
pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for the acute
Schorr M, Thomas JJ, Eddy KT, et al (2017) Bone density, body com- treatment of adult outpatients with anorexia nervosa: study protocol for
position, and psychopathology of anorexia nervosa spectrum disorders the systematic review and network meta-analysis of individual data.
in DSM-IV vs DSM-5. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 50: Journal of Eating Disorders, 5: 24.
343–51.
Ward A, Ramsay R, Russell G, et al (2016) Follow-up mortality study of
Slade E, Keeney E, Mavranezouli I, et al (2018) Treatments for bulimia compulsorily treated patients with anorexia nervosa. International
nervosa: a network meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine, 48: 2629–36. Journal of Eating Disorders, 49(4): 435.
Solmi M, Collantoni E, Meneguzzo P, et al (2018) Network analysis of spe- Watson HJ, Yilmaz Z, Thornton LM, et al (2019) Genome-wide association
cific psychopathology and psychiatric symptoms in patients with eating study identifies eight risk loci and implicates metabo-psychiatric origins
disorders. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 51: 80–692. for anorexia nervosa. Nature Genetics, 51: 1207–14.
Steinhausen HC, Jensen CM (2015) Time trends in lifetime incidence Wierenga CE, Hill L, Knatz Peck S, et al (2018) The acceptability, feasibil-
rates of first-time diagnosed anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa across ity, and possible benefits of a neurobiologically-informed 5-day multifam-
16 years in a Danish nationwide psychiatric registry study. International ily treatment for adults with anorexia nervosa. International Journal of
Journal of Eating Disorders, 48: 845–50. Eating Disorders, 51: 863–89.
Stice E, Gau JM, Rohde P, et al (2017) Risk factors that predict future World Health Organization (2018) ICD-11 for Mortality and Morbidity
onset of each DSM-5 eating disorder: predictive specificity in high-risk Statistics. Release version 04/2019. WHO (https://icd.who.int/browse11/
adolescent females. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 126: 38–51. l-m/en [cited 5 Jan 2020]).
MCQs 3 Regarding assessment of patients with 5 Which of the following statements about
Select the single best option for each question stem probable eating disorders: comorbidities in eating disorders is not true?
a the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire a around 30% of patients with eating disorders
1 Lifetime prevalence of anorexia nervosa in (EDE-Q) is the gold-standard validated self-report meet criteria for at least one personality disorder
European women is estimated to be about: questionnaire for assessment of eating disorders b the most common cause of mortality in anorexia
a 0.05% is adults nervosa is starvation
b 1% b the MARSIPAN checklist assesses the psycho- c prior obsessive–compulsive disorder increases
c 5% social severity of an eating disorder the risk of subsequent bulimia nervosa
d 10% c the Clinical Impairment Assessment (CIA) ques- d in individuals with comorbid type 1 diabetes and
e 20%. tionnaire rates weight change in recovering eat- eating disorder, most diabetic complications are
ing disorders reversible
2 Current knowledge regarding the causation d doctors have a responsibility to consider patients’ e women attending infertility clinics have a high
of eating disorders suggests that: fitness to drive only if the patient is significantly prevalence of lifetime eating disorder.
a bulimia nervosa and binge eating disorder are underweight
inherited in a polygenic fashion, whereas anor- e all patients with anorexia nervosa require an
exia nervosa is now thought to show autosomal urgent DEXA scan of bone to screen for life-
recessive inheritance with partial penetrance threatening osteoporosis.
b a history of childhood sexual abuse is strongly
predictive of the development of anorexia ner- 4 There is evidence of at least moderate
vosa in the early teens effectiveness for:
c there is a strong familial component to binge a family-based treatments for individuals with
eating disorder, with estimates of heritability anorexia nervosa who are under the age of 18
between 28 and 74% b dialectical behaviour therapy for people with type
d scanning studies have shown that, compared 1 diabetes and an associated eating disorder
with controls, individuals with anorexia nervosa c psychodynamically informed multi-family groups
have increases in brain areas associated with for adults with binge eating disorder
self-recognition and interoceptive awareness d rebirthing therapies for teenagers with anorexia
e an ‘over-involved’ style of parenting, particularly nervosa
in the mother–daughter relationship, predisposes e single-session cognitive–behavioural therapy for
girls to develop eating disorders. bulimia nervosa in adults.